Evaluación de la lectura: una escala de fluidez basada en textos

Evaluación de la lectura: una escala de fluidez basada en textos

La participación de los estudiantes en debates con sus familiares y amigos sobre asuntos que tienen que ver con la política o la sociedad, la eficacia política interna y las expectativas sociopolíticas de participación son indicadores de compromiso cívico adolescente. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la influencia de la participación comunicativa sociopolítica de los adolescentes de España en las expectativas de participación sociopolítica, de forma directa y a través de la eficacia política interna según el género. Esta investigación basada en el proyecto “Barómetro OPINA” fue un estudio transversal y participaron en él 4711 adolescentes con edades comprendidas entre los 13 y los 18 años. Los instrumentos utilizados fueron tres esc... Ver más

Guardado en:

Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología

2027-1786

2500-6517

Jaichenco, Virginia Irene

Ferroni, Marina

Fumagalli, Julieta Carolina

CORPORACIÓN UNIVERSITARIA IBEROAMERICANA

10.33881/2027-1786.rip.15302

15

2023-05-02

15

26

Colombia

Lectura- comprensión de textos- fluidez lectora- precisión – velocidad- prosodia

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología - 2022

id ff39aab6b818c50967a24750507b5d43
record_format ojs
spelling Evaluación de la lectura: una escala de fluidez basada en textos
Muñoz, M. B., Silva, D. S., & Rodríguez, C. R. (2019). Inteligencia fluida, memoria de trabajo, fluidez lectora y comprensión de lectura en escolares chilenos. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 17(48). https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v17i48.2251
Rasinski, T.; Padak, N.; McKeon, C.; Wilfong, L.; Friedauer, J. & Heim, P. (2005). Is Reading Fluency a Key for Successful High School Reading? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49. 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.49.1.3.
Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing Reading Fluency. Pacific Resources for Education and Learning (PREL), 28. www.prel.org/programs/rel/rel.asp.%0Ahttps://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED483166
Rasinski, T. V. (1991). Training Teachers to Attend to Their Students’ Oral Reading Fluency. Theory Into Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849109543502
Rasinski, T., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading fluency: More than automaticity? more than a concern for the primary grades? Literacy Research and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070802468715
Rasinski, T., & Smith, M. (2018). The Mega Book for Fluency. New York, NY: Scholastic. Rasinski, T. (2014). Fluency matters. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(1), 3-12 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1053609
Ramírez-Benítez, Y.; Bernal-Ruiz, F.; Morales, R. M. (2019). Decodificación fonológica y fluidez lectora: un estudio longitudinal. Phonological decoding and fluency reader: A longitudinal study. Revista Chilena de Neuropsicologia. 14. 8-13. https://doi.org/10.5839/rcnp.2019.14.02.02.
Protopapas, A. & Parrila, R. & Simos, P. (2014). In Search of Matthew Effects in Reading. Journal of learning disabilities. 49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414559974.
Pinnell, G. S., Pikulski, J. J., Wixson, K. K., Campbell, J. R., Gough, P. B., & Beatty, A. S. (Eds. ). (1995). Listening to children read aloud: Oral fluency.
Pinilla Roa, S. L., Moreno Pérez, E. Y. ., & Rodríguez Sierra, A. V. . (2022). Las pruebas de fluidez lectora como estrategia para mejorar la comprensión de lectura en estudiantes de grado cuarto de la Institución Educativa el Bosque. Revista Perspectivas, 7(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.22463/25909215.3388
Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between Decoding and Reading Comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 510–519. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20205516
Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word Knowledge in a Theory of Reading Comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
Patel, R. & McNab, C. (2011). Displaying prosodic text to enhance expressive oral reading. Speech Communication. 53. 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2010.11.007. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
National Reading Panel, 2000: “Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction”, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [https://www.nichd.nih. gov/publications/pubs/nrp/findings, fecha de consulta:11/8/2022]. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat.1425 (2002).
Moura, O., Pereira, M., Moreno, J., & Simões, M. R. (2020). Investigating the double-deficit hypothesis of developmental dyslexia in an orthography of intermediate depth. Annals of Dyslexia, 70(1), 43—61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00190-1
Samuels, S. J. (1997). INTRODUCTION TO AUTOMATICITY: THEORY AND PRACTICE. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13(2), 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057356970130201
Morris, D.; Pennell, A.; Perney, J. & Trathen, W. (2018). Using Subjective and Objective Measures to Predict Reading Fluency at the End of First Grade. Reading Psychology. 39. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.1418466.
Moll, K., Ramus, F., Bartling, J., Bruder, J., Kunze, S., Neuhoff, N., Streiftau, S., Lyytinen, H., Leppänen, P. H. T., Lohvansuu, K., Tóth, D., Honbolygó, F., Csépe, V., Bogliotti, C., Iannuzzi, S., Démonet, J. F., Longeras, E., Valdois, S., George, F., … Landerl, K. (2014). Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 29, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.003
Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2008). A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Reading Prosody as a Dimension of Oral Reading Fluency in Early Elementary School Children. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.43.4.2
Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2006). Prosody of syntactically complex sentences in the oral reading of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 839–843. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.839
Martins, M. A., & Capellini, S. A. (2021). Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures. Psicologia, Reflexao e Critica : Revista Semestral Do Departamento de Psicologia Da UFRGS, 34(1), 10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00174-z
Logan, G. D. (1997). Automaticity and reading: perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057356970130203
Lane, H. B., Hudson, R. F., Leite, W. L., Kosanovich, M. L., Strout, M. T., Fenty, N. S., & Wright, T. L. (2009). Teacher knowledge about reading fluency and indicators of students’ fluency growth in reading first schools. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 25(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560802491232
Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of Word Reading Fluency and Spelling in a Consistent Orthography: An 8-Year Follow-Up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.150
Landerl, K., Freudenthaler, H. H., Heene, M., De Jong, P. F., Desrochers, A., Manolitsis, G., Parrila, R., & Georgiou, G. K. (2019). Phonological Awareness and Rapid Automatized Naming as Longitudinal Predictors of Reading in Five Alphabetic Orthographies with Varying Degrees of Consistency. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(3), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1510936
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
Kuhn, M. & Stahl, S. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21. Journal of Educational Psychology. 95. 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.3.
Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E. B., Levy, B. A., Rasinski, T. V., Burke, M. D., Crowder, W., Hagan-burke, S., Zou, Y., Burke, M. D., Crowder, W., Hagan-burke, S., Construct, I., Valencia, S. W., Smith, A. T., Reece, A. M., Li, M., Wixson, K. K., & Newman, H. (2010). Rave-O.pdf. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.45.2.4
Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of Three Components of Reading Fluency to Reading Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310
Rupley, W. H., Nichols, W. D., Rasinski, T. V., & Paige, D. (2020). Fluency: Deep roots in reading instruction. Education Sciences, 10(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060155
Samuels, S. J. (2006). Toward a Model of Reading Fluency. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp. 24–46). International Reading Association.
Jacobsen, G. M., de Mello, C. M., Kochhann, R., & Fonseca, R. P. (2017). Executive Functions in School-age Children: Influence of Age, Gender, School Type and Parental Education. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(4), 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3338
Wolters, A., Kim, Y. G., & Szura, J. W. (2022). Is reading prosody related to reading comprehension? A meta-analysis. Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, 26(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1850733
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Zutell, J. & Rasinski, R. (1991) Training teachers to attend to their students’ oral reading fluency, Theory Into Practice, 30:3, 211-217, https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849109543502
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2006). Becoming literate in different languages: Similar problems, different solutions. Developmental Science, 9(5), 429–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00509.x
Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., Saine, N., Lyytinen, H., Vaessen, A., & Blomert, L. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: a cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 4, 551–559. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363406
Young, C., Rasinski, T, & Landreth, S.2 (2021). Principles of effective reading fluency instruction. In Parsons, S., & Vaughn, M. (Eds.) Principles of effective literacy instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Young, C., Rasinski, T., Paige, D. D., & Rupley, W. H. (2020). Defining fluency: Finding the missing pieces for reading fluency. June.
Whalley, K. M. (2017). The Role of prosodic skills in reading comprehension. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/107458/
Samuels, S. J. (2007). The DIBELS tests: Is speed of barking at print what we mean by reading fluency? Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 563-566. https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=379669
Veenendaal, N. J., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). Bidirectional Relations Between Text Reading Prosody and Reading Comprehension in the Upper Primary School Grades: A Longitudinal Perspective. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(3), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1128939
Veenendaal, N. J., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2014). The role of speech prosody and text reading prosody in children’s reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12036
Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Alexander, A. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 333-355). Parkton, Md.: York Press. Valencia, S. W., Smith, A. T., Reece, A. M., Li, M., Wixson, K. K., & Newman, H. (2010). Oral reading fluency assessment: Issues of construct, criterion, and consequential validity. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(3), 270–291. dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.3.1
Suárez-Coalla, P., Álvarez-Cañizo, M., Martínez, C., García, N., & Cuetos, F. (2016). Reading prosody in Spanish dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-016-0123-5
Silva-Maceda, Gabriela, & Romero-Contreras, Silvia. (2017). Leer rápido no siempre es igual a comprender: Examinando la relación entre velocidad y comprensión. Revista Costarricense de Psicología, 36(2), 123-144. https://dx.doi.org/10.22544/rcps.v36i02.03
Seymour, P., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies [Electronic version]. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859 Seymour, P. H. K. (2005). European Orthographies. The Science of Reading : A Handbook, 296–315.
Serrano, F., & Defior, S. (2008). Dyslexia speed problems in a transparent orthography. Annals of Dyslexia, 58(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-008-0013-6
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E. B., Wisenbaker, J. M., Kuhn, M. R., Strauss, G. P., & Morris, R. D. (2006). Becoming a fluent and automatic reader in the early elementary school years. Reading research quarterly, 41(4), 496-522. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.4.4
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Kuhn, M. R. (2015). Reading fluency. Handbook of Individual Differences in Reading: Reader, Text, and Context, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203075562
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Hamilton, A. M., Kuhn, M. R., Wisenbaker, J. M., & Stahl, S. A. (2004). Becoming a Fluent Reader: Reading Skill and Prosodic Features in the Oral Reading of Young Readers. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.119
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Benjamin, R. G. (2017). Lexical prosody as an aspect of oral reading fluency. Reading and Writing, 30(1), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9667-3
Sautú, R. (1991). Teoría y medición del estatus ocupacional: escalas ocupacionales objetivas y de prestigio. Buenos Aires, AR: Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Samuels, S. J., & Flor, R. F. (1997). The importance of automaticity for developing expertise in reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057356970130202
Jiménez González, J. E., & Valle, I. H. (2000). Word identification and reading disorders in the Spanish language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300108
Hudson, R. F., Pullen, P. C., Lane, H. B., & Torgesen, J. K. (2009). The complex nature of reading fluency: A multidimensional view. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 25(1), 4–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560802491208
Publication
Revista iberoamericana de psicología
Aravena, S., Tijms, J., Katzir, T., Shaul, S., Breznitz, Z., Wolf, M., Rasinski, T. V, Paige, D. D., Rains, C., Stewart, F., Julovich, B., Prenkert, D., Rupley, W. H., Nichols, W. D., Jones, M. W., Branigan, H. P., Louise Kelly, M., Fernandes, S., Querido, L., … Nurmi, J. E. (2017). The Effects of Reading Fluency Interventions on the Reading Fluency and Reading Comprehension Performance of Elementary Students With Learning Disabilities: A Synthesis of the Research from 2001 to 2014. Annals of Dyslexia, 23(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000905237066
Arancibia Gutiérrez, B., León, H., Castro Yáñez, G. G., Bizama Muñoz, M., & Sáez Carrillo, K. . (2022). Comprensión de lectura, reconocimiento de palabras y fluidez lectora en escolares de sexto año básico. Onomázein, (55), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.55.05
Álvarez-Cañizo, M., Suárez-Coalla, P., & Cuetos, F. (2018). Reading prosody development in Spanish children. Reading and Writing, 31(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9768-7
Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Pullen, P. C. (2005). Reading Fluency Assessment and Instruction: What, Why, and How? The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 702–714. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.58.8.1
Álvarez-Cañizo, M., Martínez-García, C., Cuetos, F., & Suárez-Coalla, P. (2020). Development of reading prosody in school-age Spanish children: a longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Reading. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12286
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología - 2022
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Español
https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/rip.15302
Bogotá: Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana
Barboza-Palomino, M., & Ventura-León, J. L. (2017). Aplicación de un programa para mejorar la velocidad y comprensión de lectura en estudiantes universitarios. Investigaciones Sobre Lectura, 8, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.37132/isl.v0i8.216
application/pdf
Artículo de revista
Núm. 3 , Año 2022 : Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología
3
15
Lectura- comprensión de textos- fluidez lectora- precisión – velocidad- prosodia
Jaichenco, Virginia Irene
Ferroni, Marina
Fumagalli, Julieta Carolina
La participación de los estudiantes en debates con sus familiares y amigos sobre asuntos que tienen que ver con la política o la sociedad, la eficacia política interna y las expectativas sociopolíticas de participación son indicadores de compromiso cívico adolescente. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la influencia de la participación comunicativa sociopolítica de los adolescentes de España en las expectativas de participación sociopolítica, de forma directa y a través de la eficacia política interna según el género. Esta investigación basada en el proyecto “Barómetro OPINA” fue un estudio transversal y participaron en él 4711 adolescentes con edades comprendidas entre los 13 y los 18 años. Los instrumentos utilizados fueron tres escalas que medían los indicadores de compromiso cívico propuestos. Se realizaron comparaciones de media, un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales y un análisis de invarianza según el género. Los resultados obtenidos mostraron diferencias significativas en las puntuaciones de expectativas de participación sociopolítica y eficacia política interna. El modelo mostró buenos indicadores de ajuste sin efectos de mediación e invarianza según el género. El estudio concluye que debates sociopolíticos con familiares y amigos o ver noticias explica las creencias que tienen los jóvenes sobre cómo influir en la política y cómo intervenir en un futuro en situaciones que beneficien a su comunidad.
Arcand, M.-S., Dion, E., Lemire-Théberge, L., Guay, M.-H., Barrette, A., Gagnon, V., Caron, P.-O., & Fuchs, D. (2014). Segmenting Texts Into Meaningful Word Groups: Beginning Readers’ Prosody and Comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(3), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.864658
Álvarez-Cañizo, M., Suárez-Coalla, P., & Cuetos, F. (2015). The role of reading fluency in children’s text comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(NOV), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01810
Benjamin, R. G., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2010). Text Complexity and Oral Reading Prosody in Young Readers. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.45.4.2
Diuk, B.; Barreyro, J.P.; Ferroni, M.; Mena, M.; Serrano, F.(2019) Reading Difficulties in Low-SES Children: A Study of Cognitive Profiles; Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd; Journal of Cognition and Development; 20; 1; 1-2019; 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2018.1545656
Hofmann, M. J., Stenneken, P., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Sublexical frequency measures for orthographic and phonological units in German. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 620–629. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193034
Hernandez Sampieri, R., Fernandez Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2008). Metodología de la investigación (4 ed.). México, DF: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636–644.
Groen, M. A., Veenendaal, N. J., & Verhoeven, L. (2019). The role of prosody in reading comprehension: evidence from poor comprehenders. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12133
Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame’enui, E. J. (2019). The Importance and Decision-Making Utility of a Continuum of Fluency-Based Indicators of Foundational Reading Skills for Third-Grade High-Stakes Outcomes. The Role of Fluency in Reading Competence, Assessment, and Instruction, July 2013, 257–288. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410608246-4
González-Trujillo, M. C., Calet, N., Defior, S., & Gutiérrez-Palma, N. (2014). Escala de fluidez lectora en español: midiendo los componentes de la fluidez. Estudios de Psicologia, 35(1), 104–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2014.893651
Fumagalli, J., Sanchez, M.E.; Barreyro, J.P. Jacubovich, S.; Jaichenco, V. (2018). Evaluación de la fluidez lectora en niños con dislexia. Revista Argentina de Neuropsicología, 34, 12-30.
Fumagalli, J., Barreyro, J. P., & Jaichenco, V. (2020). SUBJETIVAS Y OBJETIVAS Reading fluency assessment : Objective and subjective measures. 14(1426), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.7714/CNPS/14.1.209
Fumagalli, J., Barreyro, J. P., & Jaichenco, V. (2014). Consciencia silábica y consciencia fonémica ¿Cuál es el mejor predictor del rendimiento lector? In Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento (Vol. 6, Issue 3, pp. 17–30).
Fumagalli, J., Barreyro, J.P & Jaichenco, V. (2017). Niveles de fluidez lectora y comprensión de textos. Revista Latinoamericana de Lectura y Escritura, 4(8), 163–186.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral Reading Fluency as an Indicator of Reading Competence: A Theoretical, Empirical, and Historical Analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3
Benjamin, R. G., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E. B., Groff, C., Kuhn, M. R., & Steiner, L. (2013). A spectrographically grounded scale for evaluating reading expressiveness. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2), 105–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.43
Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
Cuetos, F., Arribas, D., & Ramos, J. L. (2016). Manual Prolec - Se - R. TEA Ediciones S.A., 1–111.
Bizama, M.; Silva, D. & Rodríguez, C. (2019). Inteligencia fluida, memoria de trabajo, fluidez lectora y comprensión de lectura en escolares chilenos. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology. 17. 10.25115/ejrep.v17i48.2251.
Denton, C.; Barth, A.; Fletcher, J.; Wexler, J.; Vaughn, S.; Cirino, P.; Romain, M. & Francis, D. (2011). The Relations Among Oral and Silent Reading Fluency and Comprehension in Middle School: Implications for Identification and Instruction of Students With Reading Difficulties. Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading. 15. 109-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888431003623546.
Defior, S. Fonseca, L.; Gottheil, B.; Aldrey, A.; Pujals, M.; Rosa, G.; Jiménez Fernández, G.; Serrano Chica, F. (2007). LEE . Test de Lectura y Escritura en Español. Psicologia y Psicopedagogía, 17, 1–7.
Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., Stanovich, K. E., & Share, D. L. (2002). Orthographic learning during reading: Examining the role of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82(3), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(02)00008-5
Bolaños, D., Cole, R. A., Ward, W. H., Tindal, G. A., Hasbrouck, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2013). Human and automated assessment of oral reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1142–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031479
Breznitz, Z. (2005). Fluency in Reading: Synchronization of Processes (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617019
Cohen, J. (2011). Building Fluency through the Repeated Reading Method. English Teaching Forum, 49(3), 20–27. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1018480000?accountid=14548
Cuetos, F., Blanca, R., Elvira, R., & David, A. (2014). PROLEC-R. Batería de Evalución de los Procesos Lectores. Batería de Evalución de Los Procesos Lectores.
Cohen, M. J., Morgan, A. M., Vaughn, M., Riccio, C. A., & Hall, J. (1999). Verbal fluency in children developmental issues and differential validity in distinguishing children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and two subtypes of dyslexia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14(5), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(98)00038-9
Reading assessment: narrative text-based fluency scale
Students' participation in debates with family and friends on socio-political issues, internal political efficacy, and socio-political expectations of participation are indicators of adolescent civic engagement. The objective of this study was to analyze the influence of the socio-political communicative participation of adolescents in Spain on the expectations of socio-political participation, directly and through internal political efficacy according to gender. This research is based on the "OPINA Barometer" project, which was a cross-sectional study and involved 4711 adolescents aged between 13 and 18 years. The instruments used were three scales that measured the proposed indicators of civic engagement. Mean comparisons, a model of structural equations and an analysis of invariance according to gender were performed. The results obtained showed significant differences in the scores of expectations of socio-political participation and internal political efficacy. The model showed good adjustment indicators without effects of mediation and invariance according to gender. The study concludes that socio-political debates with family and friends or watching news explains the beliefs young people have about how to influence politics and how to intervene in the future in situations that benefit their community.
Journal article
Reading- Reading comprehension – Reading fluency - accuracy – Reading rate- prosody
10.33881/2027-1786.rip.15302
https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/download/rip.15302/rip.15302
26
https://doi.org/10.33881/2027-1786.rip.15302
2023-05-02T00:00:00Z
2023-05-02T00:00:00Z
2023-05-02
2027-1786
2500-6517
15
institution CORPORACIÓN UNIVERSITARIA IBEROAMERICANA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/CORPORACIONUNIVERSITARIAIBEROAMERICANA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología
title Evaluación de la lectura: una escala de fluidez basada en textos
spellingShingle Evaluación de la lectura: una escala de fluidez basada en textos
Jaichenco, Virginia Irene
Ferroni, Marina
Fumagalli, Julieta Carolina
Lectura- comprensión de textos- fluidez lectora- precisión – velocidad- prosodia
Reading- Reading comprehension – Reading fluency - accuracy – Reading rate- prosody
title_short Evaluación de la lectura: una escala de fluidez basada en textos
title_full Evaluación de la lectura: una escala de fluidez basada en textos
title_fullStr Evaluación de la lectura: una escala de fluidez basada en textos
title_full_unstemmed Evaluación de la lectura: una escala de fluidez basada en textos
title_sort evaluación de la lectura: una escala de fluidez basada en textos
title_eng Reading assessment: narrative text-based fluency scale
description La participación de los estudiantes en debates con sus familiares y amigos sobre asuntos que tienen que ver con la política o la sociedad, la eficacia política interna y las expectativas sociopolíticas de participación son indicadores de compromiso cívico adolescente. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la influencia de la participación comunicativa sociopolítica de los adolescentes de España en las expectativas de participación sociopolítica, de forma directa y a través de la eficacia política interna según el género. Esta investigación basada en el proyecto “Barómetro OPINA” fue un estudio transversal y participaron en él 4711 adolescentes con edades comprendidas entre los 13 y los 18 años. Los instrumentos utilizados fueron tres escalas que medían los indicadores de compromiso cívico propuestos. Se realizaron comparaciones de media, un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales y un análisis de invarianza según el género. Los resultados obtenidos mostraron diferencias significativas en las puntuaciones de expectativas de participación sociopolítica y eficacia política interna. El modelo mostró buenos indicadores de ajuste sin efectos de mediación e invarianza según el género. El estudio concluye que debates sociopolíticos con familiares y amigos o ver noticias explica las creencias que tienen los jóvenes sobre cómo influir en la política y cómo intervenir en un futuro en situaciones que beneficien a su comunidad.
description_eng Students' participation in debates with family and friends on socio-political issues, internal political efficacy, and socio-political expectations of participation are indicators of adolescent civic engagement. The objective of this study was to analyze the influence of the socio-political communicative participation of adolescents in Spain on the expectations of socio-political participation, directly and through internal political efficacy according to gender. This research is based on the "OPINA Barometer" project, which was a cross-sectional study and involved 4711 adolescents aged between 13 and 18 years. The instruments used were three scales that measured the proposed indicators of civic engagement. Mean comparisons, a model of structural equations and an analysis of invariance according to gender were performed. The results obtained showed significant differences in the scores of expectations of socio-political participation and internal political efficacy. The model showed good adjustment indicators without effects of mediation and invariance according to gender. The study concludes that socio-political debates with family and friends or watching news explains the beliefs young people have about how to influence politics and how to intervene in the future in situations that benefit their community.
author Jaichenco, Virginia Irene
Ferroni, Marina
Fumagalli, Julieta Carolina
author_facet Jaichenco, Virginia Irene
Ferroni, Marina
Fumagalli, Julieta Carolina
topicspa_str_mv Lectura- comprensión de textos- fluidez lectora- precisión – velocidad- prosodia
topic Lectura- comprensión de textos- fluidez lectora- precisión – velocidad- prosodia
Reading- Reading comprehension – Reading fluency - accuracy – Reading rate- prosody
topic_facet Lectura- comprensión de textos- fluidez lectora- precisión – velocidad- prosodia
Reading- Reading comprehension – Reading fluency - accuracy – Reading rate- prosody
citationvolume 15
citationissue 3
citationedition Núm. 3 , Año 2022 : Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología
publisher Bogotá: Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana
ispartofjournal Revista iberoamericana de psicología
source https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/rip.15302
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología - 2022
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
references Muñoz, M. B., Silva, D. S., & Rodríguez, C. R. (2019). Inteligencia fluida, memoria de trabajo, fluidez lectora y comprensión de lectura en escolares chilenos. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 17(48). https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v17i48.2251
Rasinski, T.; Padak, N.; McKeon, C.; Wilfong, L.; Friedauer, J. & Heim, P. (2005). Is Reading Fluency a Key for Successful High School Reading? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49. 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.49.1.3.
Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing Reading Fluency. Pacific Resources for Education and Learning (PREL), 28. www.prel.org/programs/rel/rel.asp.%0Ahttps://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED483166
Rasinski, T. V. (1991). Training Teachers to Attend to Their Students’ Oral Reading Fluency. Theory Into Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849109543502
Rasinski, T., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading fluency: More than automaticity? more than a concern for the primary grades? Literacy Research and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070802468715
Rasinski, T., & Smith, M. (2018). The Mega Book for Fluency. New York, NY: Scholastic. Rasinski, T. (2014). Fluency matters. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(1), 3-12 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1053609
Ramírez-Benítez, Y.; Bernal-Ruiz, F.; Morales, R. M. (2019). Decodificación fonológica y fluidez lectora: un estudio longitudinal. Phonological decoding and fluency reader: A longitudinal study. Revista Chilena de Neuropsicologia. 14. 8-13. https://doi.org/10.5839/rcnp.2019.14.02.02.
Protopapas, A. & Parrila, R. & Simos, P. (2014). In Search of Matthew Effects in Reading. Journal of learning disabilities. 49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414559974.
Pinnell, G. S., Pikulski, J. J., Wixson, K. K., Campbell, J. R., Gough, P. B., & Beatty, A. S. (Eds. ). (1995). Listening to children read aloud: Oral fluency.
Pinilla Roa, S. L., Moreno Pérez, E. Y. ., & Rodríguez Sierra, A. V. . (2022). Las pruebas de fluidez lectora como estrategia para mejorar la comprensión de lectura en estudiantes de grado cuarto de la Institución Educativa el Bosque. Revista Perspectivas, 7(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.22463/25909215.3388
Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between Decoding and Reading Comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 510–519. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20205516
Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word Knowledge in a Theory of Reading Comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
Patel, R. & McNab, C. (2011). Displaying prosodic text to enhance expressive oral reading. Speech Communication. 53. 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2010.11.007. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
National Reading Panel, 2000: “Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction”, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [https://www.nichd.nih. gov/publications/pubs/nrp/findings, fecha de consulta:11/8/2022]. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat.1425 (2002).
Moura, O., Pereira, M., Moreno, J., & Simões, M. R. (2020). Investigating the double-deficit hypothesis of developmental dyslexia in an orthography of intermediate depth. Annals of Dyslexia, 70(1), 43—61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00190-1
Samuels, S. J. (1997). INTRODUCTION TO AUTOMATICITY: THEORY AND PRACTICE. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13(2), 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057356970130201
Morris, D.; Pennell, A.; Perney, J. & Trathen, W. (2018). Using Subjective and Objective Measures to Predict Reading Fluency at the End of First Grade. Reading Psychology. 39. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.1418466.
Moll, K., Ramus, F., Bartling, J., Bruder, J., Kunze, S., Neuhoff, N., Streiftau, S., Lyytinen, H., Leppänen, P. H. T., Lohvansuu, K., Tóth, D., Honbolygó, F., Csépe, V., Bogliotti, C., Iannuzzi, S., Démonet, J. F., Longeras, E., Valdois, S., George, F., … Landerl, K. (2014). Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 29, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.003
Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2008). A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Reading Prosody as a Dimension of Oral Reading Fluency in Early Elementary School Children. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.43.4.2
Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2006). Prosody of syntactically complex sentences in the oral reading of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 839–843. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.839
Martins, M. A., & Capellini, S. A. (2021). Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures. Psicologia, Reflexao e Critica : Revista Semestral Do Departamento de Psicologia Da UFRGS, 34(1), 10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00174-z
Logan, G. D. (1997). Automaticity and reading: perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057356970130203
Lane, H. B., Hudson, R. F., Leite, W. L., Kosanovich, M. L., Strout, M. T., Fenty, N. S., & Wright, T. L. (2009). Teacher knowledge about reading fluency and indicators of students’ fluency growth in reading first schools. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 25(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560802491232
Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of Word Reading Fluency and Spelling in a Consistent Orthography: An 8-Year Follow-Up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.150
Landerl, K., Freudenthaler, H. H., Heene, M., De Jong, P. F., Desrochers, A., Manolitsis, G., Parrila, R., & Georgiou, G. K. (2019). Phonological Awareness and Rapid Automatized Naming as Longitudinal Predictors of Reading in Five Alphabetic Orthographies with Varying Degrees of Consistency. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(3), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1510936
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
Kuhn, M. & Stahl, S. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21. Journal of Educational Psychology. 95. 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.3.
Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E. B., Levy, B. A., Rasinski, T. V., Burke, M. D., Crowder, W., Hagan-burke, S., Zou, Y., Burke, M. D., Crowder, W., Hagan-burke, S., Construct, I., Valencia, S. W., Smith, A. T., Reece, A. M., Li, M., Wixson, K. K., & Newman, H. (2010). Rave-O.pdf. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.45.2.4
Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of Three Components of Reading Fluency to Reading Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310
Rupley, W. H., Nichols, W. D., Rasinski, T. V., & Paige, D. (2020). Fluency: Deep roots in reading instruction. Education Sciences, 10(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060155
Samuels, S. J. (2006). Toward a Model of Reading Fluency. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp. 24–46). International Reading Association.
Jacobsen, G. M., de Mello, C. M., Kochhann, R., & Fonseca, R. P. (2017). Executive Functions in School-age Children: Influence of Age, Gender, School Type and Parental Education. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(4), 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3338
Wolters, A., Kim, Y. G., & Szura, J. W. (2022). Is reading prosody related to reading comprehension? A meta-analysis. Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, 26(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1850733
Zutell, J. & Rasinski, R. (1991) Training teachers to attend to their students’ oral reading fluency, Theory Into Practice, 30:3, 211-217, https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849109543502
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2006). Becoming literate in different languages: Similar problems, different solutions. Developmental Science, 9(5), 429–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00509.x
Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., Saine, N., Lyytinen, H., Vaessen, A., & Blomert, L. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: a cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 4, 551–559. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363406
Young, C., Rasinski, T, & Landreth, S.2 (2021). Principles of effective reading fluency instruction. In Parsons, S., & Vaughn, M. (Eds.) Principles of effective literacy instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Young, C., Rasinski, T., Paige, D. D., & Rupley, W. H. (2020). Defining fluency: Finding the missing pieces for reading fluency. June.
Whalley, K. M. (2017). The Role of prosodic skills in reading comprehension. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/107458/
Samuels, S. J. (2007). The DIBELS tests: Is speed of barking at print what we mean by reading fluency? Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 563-566. https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=379669
Veenendaal, N. J., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). Bidirectional Relations Between Text Reading Prosody and Reading Comprehension in the Upper Primary School Grades: A Longitudinal Perspective. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(3), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1128939
Veenendaal, N. J., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2014). The role of speech prosody and text reading prosody in children’s reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12036
Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Alexander, A. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 333-355). Parkton, Md.: York Press. Valencia, S. W., Smith, A. T., Reece, A. M., Li, M., Wixson, K. K., & Newman, H. (2010). Oral reading fluency assessment: Issues of construct, criterion, and consequential validity. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(3), 270–291. dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.3.1
Suárez-Coalla, P., Álvarez-Cañizo, M., Martínez, C., García, N., & Cuetos, F. (2016). Reading prosody in Spanish dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-016-0123-5
Silva-Maceda, Gabriela, & Romero-Contreras, Silvia. (2017). Leer rápido no siempre es igual a comprender: Examinando la relación entre velocidad y comprensión. Revista Costarricense de Psicología, 36(2), 123-144. https://dx.doi.org/10.22544/rcps.v36i02.03
Seymour, P., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies [Electronic version]. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859 Seymour, P. H. K. (2005). European Orthographies. The Science of Reading : A Handbook, 296–315.
Serrano, F., & Defior, S. (2008). Dyslexia speed problems in a transparent orthography. Annals of Dyslexia, 58(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-008-0013-6
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E. B., Wisenbaker, J. M., Kuhn, M. R., Strauss, G. P., & Morris, R. D. (2006). Becoming a fluent and automatic reader in the early elementary school years. Reading research quarterly, 41(4), 496-522. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.4.4
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Kuhn, M. R. (2015). Reading fluency. Handbook of Individual Differences in Reading: Reader, Text, and Context, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203075562
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Hamilton, A. M., Kuhn, M. R., Wisenbaker, J. M., & Stahl, S. A. (2004). Becoming a Fluent Reader: Reading Skill and Prosodic Features in the Oral Reading of Young Readers. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.119
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Benjamin, R. G. (2017). Lexical prosody as an aspect of oral reading fluency. Reading and Writing, 30(1), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9667-3
Sautú, R. (1991). Teoría y medición del estatus ocupacional: escalas ocupacionales objetivas y de prestigio. Buenos Aires, AR: Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Samuels, S. J., & Flor, R. F. (1997). The importance of automaticity for developing expertise in reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057356970130202
Jiménez González, J. E., & Valle, I. H. (2000). Word identification and reading disorders in the Spanish language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300108
Hudson, R. F., Pullen, P. C., Lane, H. B., & Torgesen, J. K. (2009). The complex nature of reading fluency: A multidimensional view. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 25(1), 4–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560802491208
Aravena, S., Tijms, J., Katzir, T., Shaul, S., Breznitz, Z., Wolf, M., Rasinski, T. V, Paige, D. D., Rains, C., Stewart, F., Julovich, B., Prenkert, D., Rupley, W. H., Nichols, W. D., Jones, M. W., Branigan, H. P., Louise Kelly, M., Fernandes, S., Querido, L., … Nurmi, J. E. (2017). The Effects of Reading Fluency Interventions on the Reading Fluency and Reading Comprehension Performance of Elementary Students With Learning Disabilities: A Synthesis of the Research from 2001 to 2014. Annals of Dyslexia, 23(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000905237066
Arancibia Gutiérrez, B., León, H., Castro Yáñez, G. G., Bizama Muñoz, M., & Sáez Carrillo, K. . (2022). Comprensión de lectura, reconocimiento de palabras y fluidez lectora en escolares de sexto año básico. Onomázein, (55), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.55.05
Álvarez-Cañizo, M., Suárez-Coalla, P., & Cuetos, F. (2018). Reading prosody development in Spanish children. Reading and Writing, 31(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9768-7
Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Pullen, P. C. (2005). Reading Fluency Assessment and Instruction: What, Why, and How? The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 702–714. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.58.8.1
Álvarez-Cañizo, M., Martínez-García, C., Cuetos, F., & Suárez-Coalla, P. (2020). Development of reading prosody in school-age Spanish children: a longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Reading. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12286
Barboza-Palomino, M., & Ventura-León, J. L. (2017). Aplicación de un programa para mejorar la velocidad y comprensión de lectura en estudiantes universitarios. Investigaciones Sobre Lectura, 8, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.37132/isl.v0i8.216
Arcand, M.-S., Dion, E., Lemire-Théberge, L., Guay, M.-H., Barrette, A., Gagnon, V., Caron, P.-O., & Fuchs, D. (2014). Segmenting Texts Into Meaningful Word Groups: Beginning Readers’ Prosody and Comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(3), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.864658
Álvarez-Cañizo, M., Suárez-Coalla, P., & Cuetos, F. (2015). The role of reading fluency in children’s text comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(NOV), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01810
Benjamin, R. G., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2010). Text Complexity and Oral Reading Prosody in Young Readers. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.45.4.2
Diuk, B.; Barreyro, J.P.; Ferroni, M.; Mena, M.; Serrano, F.(2019) Reading Difficulties in Low-SES Children: A Study of Cognitive Profiles; Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd; Journal of Cognition and Development; 20; 1; 1-2019; 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2018.1545656
Hofmann, M. J., Stenneken, P., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Sublexical frequency measures for orthographic and phonological units in German. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 620–629. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193034
Hernandez Sampieri, R., Fernandez Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2008). Metodología de la investigación (4 ed.). México, DF: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636–644.
Groen, M. A., Veenendaal, N. J., & Verhoeven, L. (2019). The role of prosody in reading comprehension: evidence from poor comprehenders. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12133
Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame’enui, E. J. (2019). The Importance and Decision-Making Utility of a Continuum of Fluency-Based Indicators of Foundational Reading Skills for Third-Grade High-Stakes Outcomes. The Role of Fluency in Reading Competence, Assessment, and Instruction, July 2013, 257–288. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410608246-4
González-Trujillo, M. C., Calet, N., Defior, S., & Gutiérrez-Palma, N. (2014). Escala de fluidez lectora en español: midiendo los componentes de la fluidez. Estudios de Psicologia, 35(1), 104–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2014.893651
Fumagalli, J., Sanchez, M.E.; Barreyro, J.P. Jacubovich, S.; Jaichenco, V. (2018). Evaluación de la fluidez lectora en niños con dislexia. Revista Argentina de Neuropsicología, 34, 12-30.
Fumagalli, J., Barreyro, J. P., & Jaichenco, V. (2020). SUBJETIVAS Y OBJETIVAS Reading fluency assessment : Objective and subjective measures. 14(1426), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.7714/CNPS/14.1.209
Fumagalli, J., Barreyro, J. P., & Jaichenco, V. (2014). Consciencia silábica y consciencia fonémica ¿Cuál es el mejor predictor del rendimiento lector? In Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento (Vol. 6, Issue 3, pp. 17–30).
Fumagalli, J., Barreyro, J.P & Jaichenco, V. (2017). Niveles de fluidez lectora y comprensión de textos. Revista Latinoamericana de Lectura y Escritura, 4(8), 163–186.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral Reading Fluency as an Indicator of Reading Competence: A Theoretical, Empirical, and Historical Analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3
Benjamin, R. G., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E. B., Groff, C., Kuhn, M. R., & Steiner, L. (2013). A spectrographically grounded scale for evaluating reading expressiveness. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2), 105–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.43
Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
Cuetos, F., Arribas, D., & Ramos, J. L. (2016). Manual Prolec - Se - R. TEA Ediciones S.A., 1–111.
Bizama, M.; Silva, D. & Rodríguez, C. (2019). Inteligencia fluida, memoria de trabajo, fluidez lectora y comprensión de lectura en escolares chilenos. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology. 17. 10.25115/ejrep.v17i48.2251.
Denton, C.; Barth, A.; Fletcher, J.; Wexler, J.; Vaughn, S.; Cirino, P.; Romain, M. & Francis, D. (2011). The Relations Among Oral and Silent Reading Fluency and Comprehension in Middle School: Implications for Identification and Instruction of Students With Reading Difficulties. Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading. 15. 109-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888431003623546.
Defior, S. Fonseca, L.; Gottheil, B.; Aldrey, A.; Pujals, M.; Rosa, G.; Jiménez Fernández, G.; Serrano Chica, F. (2007). LEE . Test de Lectura y Escritura en Español. Psicologia y Psicopedagogía, 17, 1–7.
Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., Stanovich, K. E., & Share, D. L. (2002). Orthographic learning during reading: Examining the role of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82(3), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(02)00008-5
Bolaños, D., Cole, R. A., Ward, W. H., Tindal, G. A., Hasbrouck, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2013). Human and automated assessment of oral reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1142–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031479
Breznitz, Z. (2005). Fluency in Reading: Synchronization of Processes (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617019
Cohen, J. (2011). Building Fluency through the Repeated Reading Method. English Teaching Forum, 49(3), 20–27. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1018480000?accountid=14548
Cuetos, F., Blanca, R., Elvira, R., & David, A. (2014). PROLEC-R. Batería de Evalución de los Procesos Lectores. Batería de Evalución de Los Procesos Lectores.
Cohen, M. J., Morgan, A. M., Vaughn, M., Riccio, C. A., & Hall, J. (1999). Verbal fluency in children developmental issues and differential validity in distinguishing children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and two subtypes of dyslexia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14(5), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(98)00038-9
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2023-05-02
date_accessioned 2023-05-02T00:00:00Z
date_available 2023-05-02T00:00:00Z
url https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/rip.15302
url_doi https://doi.org/10.33881/2027-1786.rip.15302
issn 2027-1786
eissn 2500-6517
doi 10.33881/2027-1786.rip.15302
citationstartpage 15
citationendpage 26
url2_str_mv https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/download/rip.15302/rip.15302
_version_ 1797158950190186496

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares