Filosofía rusa sobre el problema de la guerra y la paz y el diálogo intercultural
Este artículo analiza la contribución de la filosofía rusa a la tradición humanística de promover las relaciones dialógicas y la paz. Destaca el significado pacífico de la ética de la no violencia de León Tolstói, el concepto de omniunidad de Vladímir Soloviov y la filosofía dialógica de Mijaíl Bajtín. El diálogo se concibe no solo como comunicación, sino como una metafísica de la personalidad y el significado y como relaciones dialógicas a nivel intersubjetivo, social e intercultural. Estas ideas se desarrollaron en la filosofía intercultural contemporánea tanto en Rusia como en América Latina. El artículo, además, analiza los obstáculos que dificultan las relaciones dialógicas y pacíficas, agravados por la geopolítica hegemónica. El auge... Ver más
Guardado en:
2256-3202
22
2024-02-06
3
22
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Edward Demenchonok - 2024
| id |
fd6bbb49dd26c8a8b17944a0016ae45b |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Revista Guillermo de Ockham |
| title |
Filosofía rusa sobre el problema de la guerra y la paz y el diálogo intercultural |
| spellingShingle |
Filosofía rusa sobre el problema de la guerra y la paz y el diálogo intercultural Demenchonok, Edward filosofía Paz mundial Diálogo intercultural Relevante interculturalidad Bajtin Soloviov Tolstoi guerra hegemonía multipolaridad diálogo Intercultural dialogue hegemony Solovyov multipolarity dialogue Bakhtin interculturality Relevant philosophy Tolstoy Peace World peace |
| title_short |
Filosofía rusa sobre el problema de la guerra y la paz y el diálogo intercultural |
| title_full |
Filosofía rusa sobre el problema de la guerra y la paz y el diálogo intercultural |
| title_fullStr |
Filosofía rusa sobre el problema de la guerra y la paz y el diálogo intercultural |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Filosofía rusa sobre el problema de la guerra y la paz y el diálogo intercultural |
| title_sort |
filosofía rusa sobre el problema de la guerra y la paz y el diálogo intercultural |
| description |
Este artículo analiza la contribución de la filosofía rusa a la tradición humanística de promover las relaciones dialógicas y la paz. Destaca el significado pacífico de la ética de la no violencia de León Tolstói, el concepto de omniunidad de Vladímir Soloviov y la filosofía dialógica de Mijaíl Bajtín. El diálogo se concibe no solo como comunicación, sino como una metafísica de la personalidad y el significado y como relaciones dialógicas a nivel intersubjetivo, social e intercultural. Estas ideas se desarrollaron en la filosofía intercultural contemporánea tanto en Rusia como en América Latina. El artículo, además, analiza los obstáculos que dificultan las relaciones dialógicas y pacíficas, agravados por la geopolítica hegemónica. El auge de la conciencia global y de los movimientos antibelicistas condujo al final de la Guerra Fría en 1990 y creó oportunidades para una transformación positiva de las sociedades y del sistema internacional. Pero estas posibilidades fueron torpedeadas por la “revolución” neoconservadora y la política estadounidense de hegemonía global en un mundo unipolar, desencadenando una nueva Guerra Fría y la carrera armamentística, que amenazan el futuro de la humanidad. Esta política dio lugar a la guerra híbrida por delegación de la OTAN en Ucrania, que pretendía infligir una “derrota estratégica” a Rusia. Pero los países que no quieren ser dominados están luchando por un mundo alternativo, multipolar, de Estados soberanos independientes, basado en relaciones de diálogo entre iguales y en la colaboración para resolver los problemas sociales y globales y la paz. Esta alternativa toma forma en los BRICS, la Organización de Cooperación de Shanghái y otras asociaciones basadas en la igualdad soberana, el equilibrio de intereses y el consenso. El artículo destaca así el papel de la filosofía intercultural en la promoción de la diversidad cultural y las relaciones dialógicas y en la elaboración de una visión de un orden mundial libre, justo y pacífico en el futuro.
|
| description_eng |
This article analyzes the contribution of Russian philosophy to the humanistic tradition of promoting dialogical relations and peace. It highlights the peaceful significance of Leo Tolstoy’s ethics of nonviolence, Vladimir Solovyov’s concept of omniunity, and Mikhail Bakhtin’s dialogical philosophy. Dialogue is conceived not only as communication but also as a metaphysics of personality and meaning and as dialogical relationships at the intersubjective, social, and intercultural levels. These ideas were developed in contemporary intercultural philosophy both in Russia and Latin America. The article also analyzes the obstacles to dialogical and peaceful relations, aggravated by hegemonic geopolitics. The rise of global consciousness and anti-war movements led to the end of the Cold War in 1990 and created opportunities for a positive transformation of societies and the international system. But these opportunities were torpedoed by the neoconservative “revolution” and the U.S. policy of global hegemony in a unipolar world, triggering a new Cold War and the arms race, which threaten the future of humanity. This policy resulted in NATO’s hybrid proxy war in Ukraine, which sought to inflict a “strategic defeat” on Russia. But countries that do not want to be dominated are striving for an alternative, multipolar world of independent sovereign states, based on relations of dialogue between equals and collaboration to solve social and global problems and peace. This alternative takes shape in BRICS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and other associations, based on sovereign equality, a balance of interests, and consensus. The article thus highlights the role of intercultural philosophy in promoting cultural diversity and dialogical relations and in developing a vision of a free, just, and peaceful world order in the future.
|
| author |
Demenchonok, Edward |
| author_facet |
Demenchonok, Edward |
| topicspa_str_mv |
filosofía Paz mundial Diálogo intercultural Relevante interculturalidad Bajtin Soloviov Tolstoi guerra hegemonía multipolaridad diálogo |
| topic |
filosofía Paz mundial Diálogo intercultural Relevante interculturalidad Bajtin Soloviov Tolstoi guerra hegemonía multipolaridad diálogo Intercultural dialogue hegemony Solovyov multipolarity dialogue Bakhtin interculturality Relevant philosophy Tolstoy Peace World peace |
| topic_facet |
filosofía Paz mundial Diálogo intercultural Relevante interculturalidad Bajtin Soloviov Tolstoi guerra hegemonía multipolaridad diálogo Intercultural dialogue hegemony Solovyov multipolarity dialogue Bakhtin interculturality Relevant philosophy Tolstoy Peace World peace |
| citationvolume |
22 |
| citationissue |
1 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 1 , Año 2024 : El mundo contemporáneo como desafío para una filosofía o un pensar intercultural |
| publisher |
Universidad de San Buenaventura Cali |
| ispartofjournal |
Revista Guillermo de Ockham |
| source |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/view/6723 |
| language |
Inglés |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Edward Demenchonok - 2024 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| references_eng |
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. McGee, Trans.). University of Texas Press. Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act (V. Liapunov, Trans.). University of Texas Press. Brown, A. L. (2022, December 7). Angela Merkel reveals intention of Minsk agreements. Prensa Latina. https://www.prensa-latina.cu/2022/12/07/revela-angela-merkel-intencion-de-los- acuerdos-de-minsk Cohen, S. F. (2022). War with Russia?: From Putin and Ukraine to Trump and Russiagate. Hot Books. Demenchonok, E. (1983). Problemy mira i sotsial’nogo progressa v tekhnocraticheskoy ideologii [Problems of peace and social progress in tekhnocratik ideology]. In Problemy mira i sotsial’nogo progressa v sovremennoy filosofii [Problems of peace and social progress in contemporary philosophy] (pp. 209–226). Politizdat. Demenchonok, E. (1988). La “filosofía de la liberación” latinoamericana [The Latin American philosophy of liberation]. Ciencias Sociales, 1(71), 123–140. Fornet Betancourt, R. (1996). Introducción [Introduction]. In R. Fornet Betancourt (Ed.), Kultu- ren der Philosophie. Dokumentation des I. Internationalen Kongresses für interkulturelle Philosophie [Cultures of philosophy. Documentation of the I. International Congress for Intercultural Philosophy] (pp. 10–13). Verlag der Augustinus-Buchhandlung. Fornet Betancourt, R. (Ed.). (1999). Quo vadis, Philosophie? Antworten der Philosophen. Wissens- chaftsverlag Mainz in Aachen. Fornet Betancourt, R. (2016). Toward a philosophy of intercultural dialogue in a conflicted world. In E. Demenchonok (Ed.), Intercultural dialogue: In search of harmony in diversity (2nd ed., pp. 43–56). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Guseynov, A. A. (2012). Filosofiya – mysl’ i postupok [Philosophy—thought and action]. Hu- manitarian University. Horujy, S. S. (2000). O starom i novom [About the old and the new]. Aletheya. Khurshudyan, I., Sonne, P., & DeYoung, K. (2023, March 13). Ukraine short of skilled troops and munitions as losses, pessimism grow. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost. com/world/2023/03/13/ukraine-casualties-pessimism-ammunition-shortage/ Koroshiya, I. (2023, November 25). Interview with David Arakhamia, head of the Ukrainian delega- tion at the peace talks [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0G_j-7gLnWU Lavrov nazval neprimenimym printsip territorial’noy tselostnosti k kiyevskomu pravitel’stvu [La- vrov called the principle of territorial integrity inapplicable to the Kyiv government]. (2022, March 1). Interfax. https://www.interfax.ru/world/825440 Lektorsky, V. A. (2023). Philosophical reflections on humans, identity, and intercultural dialogue. In F. Dallmayr (Ed.), Dialogue and the new cosmopolitanism: Conversations with Edward De- menchonok (pp. 159–184). Lexington Books. McBride, W. L. (2010). Philosophy as global dialogue and the rejection of gratuitous military violence. In E. Demenchonok (Ed.), Philosophy after Hiroshima (pp. 419–430). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2023, August). Great power rivalries: The case for realism. Le Monde Diplomatique. https://mondediplo.com/2023/08/02great-powers Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2022, April 7). Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s comment on the new draft agreement presented by the Ukrainian side, Moscow, April 7, 2022. https://www.mid.ru/en/maps/ua/1808356/ Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2023, September 23). Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s statement at the General Debate at the 78th session of the UN General Assembly, New York, September 23, 2023. https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/1905973/ New King James Version (1982). Bible Gateway. ttps://www.biblegateway.com/versions/New-King-James-Version-NKJV-Bible/#booklist Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs (1955, July 9). Statement: The Russell-Einstein manifesto. https://pugwash.org/1955/07/09/statement-manifesto/ Romanyuk, R. (2022, May 5). Ot “kapitulyatsii” Zelenskogo do kapitulyatsii Putina. Kak idut peregovory s Rossiyey [From Zelensky’s “capitulation” to Putin’s capitulation. How are negotiations with Russia going?]. Ukrainskaya Pravda. https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/ articles/2022/05/5/7344096/ Schröder, G. (2023, October 20). Gerhard Schröder im Interview: So scheiterten die Friedensverhandlungen zwischen Ukraine und Russland [Gerhard Schröder in an interview: This is how the peace negotiations between Ukraine and Russia failed] Berliner Zeitung. https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/politik-gesellschaft/gerhard-schroeder-im-exklusiv-interviewwas-merkel-2015-gemacht-hat-war-politisch-falsch-li.2151196 Smirnov, A. V. (2019). Vse-chelovecheskoye vs Obshchechelovecheskoye. YaSK Publishing House. Smirnov, A. V. (2023). Being and process: How to “edify” “Arab reason” (and any reason at all). In F. Dallmayr (Ed.), Dialogue and the new cosmopolitanism: Conversations with Edward Demenchonok (pp. 243–255). Lexington Books. Solovyov, V. S. (1989). Works, 2 vols. (Vol. 1). Pravda. Solovyov, V. S. (1990). War, progress, and the end of history: Three conversations, including a short story of the anti-Christ (A. Bakshy, Trans.). Lindisfarne Press. Solovyov, V. S. (2010). The justification of the good: An essay on moral philosophy (R. A. Duddington, Trans.). Kessinger Publishing. Stepanyants, M. (2020). Mezhkul’turnaya filosofiya: istoki, metodologiya, problematika, perspektivy [Intercultural philosophy: Origins, methodology, problems, perspectives]. Eastern Literature. Stepanyants, M. (2023). Striving for intercultural philosophy: The contribution of Russian philosophers. In F. Dallmayr (Ed.), Dialogue and the new cosmopolitanism: Conversations with Edward Demenchonok (pp. 69–94). Lexington Books. Tolstoy, L. N. (1957). Complete works (Vol. 23). State Publishing House. Tolstoy, L. N. (2001). War and peace (A. Maude & L. Maude, Trans.). The Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/2600/pg2600-images.html#link2HCH0353 Tolstoy, L. N. (2006). The kingdom of God is within you (C. Garnett, Trans.). Dower Publications. UN General Assembly. (1970, October 24). Declaration on principles of international law concerning friendly relations and cooperation among states in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/202170?ln=en Valdai Club. (2023, October 5). Vladimir Putin meets with members of the Valdai Discussion Club. Transcript of the plenary session of the 20th Annual Meeting. https://valdaiclub.com/events/posts/articles/vladimir-putin-meets-with-members-of-the-valdai-club-transcript-2023/ Zykova, A. B. & Burgete, R. (Eds.). (1988). Iz istorii filosofii Latinskoi Ameriki XX veka [On the history of philosophy of Latin America of the XX century]. Nauka. |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2024-02-06 |
| date_accessioned |
2024-02-06T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2024-02-06T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/view/6723 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.6723 |
| eissn |
2256-3202 |
| doi |
10.21500/22563202.6723 |
| citationstartpage |
3 |
| citationendpage |
22 |
| url4_str_mv |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/download/6723/5343 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/download/6723/5342 |
| _version_ |
1797557700622548992 |
| spelling |
Filosofía rusa sobre el problema de la guerra y la paz y el diálogo intercultural filosofía Artículo de revista Filosofía rusa sobre el problema de la guerra y la paz y el diálogo intercultural Paz mundial Diálogo intercultural Relevante interculturalidad Bajtin Soloviov Tolstoi guerra hegemonía multipolaridad diálogo paz Este artículo analiza la contribución de la filosofía rusa a la tradición humanística de promover las relaciones dialógicas y la paz. Destaca el significado pacífico de la ética de la no violencia de León Tolstói, el concepto de omniunidad de Vladímir Soloviov y la filosofía dialógica de Mijaíl Bajtín. El diálogo se concibe no solo como comunicación, sino como una metafísica de la personalidad y el significado y como relaciones dialógicas a nivel intersubjetivo, social e intercultural. Estas ideas se desarrollaron en la filosofía intercultural contemporánea tanto en Rusia como en América Latina. El artículo, además, analiza los obstáculos que dificultan las relaciones dialógicas y pacíficas, agravados por la geopolítica hegemónica. El auge de la conciencia global y de los movimientos antibelicistas condujo al final de la Guerra Fría en 1990 y creó oportunidades para una transformación positiva de las sociedades y del sistema internacional. Pero estas posibilidades fueron torpedeadas por la “revolución” neoconservadora y la política estadounidense de hegemonía global en un mundo unipolar, desencadenando una nueva Guerra Fría y la carrera armamentística, que amenazan el futuro de la humanidad. Esta política dio lugar a la guerra híbrida por delegación de la OTAN en Ucrania, que pretendía infligir una “derrota estratégica” a Rusia. Pero los países que no quieren ser dominados están luchando por un mundo alternativo, multipolar, de Estados soberanos independientes, basado en relaciones de diálogo entre iguales y en la colaboración para resolver los problemas sociales y globales y la paz. Esta alternativa toma forma en los BRICS, la Organización de Cooperación de Shanghái y otras asociaciones basadas en la igualdad soberana, el equilibrio de intereses y el consenso. El artículo destaca así el papel de la filosofía intercultural en la promoción de la diversidad cultural y las relaciones dialógicas y en la elaboración de una visión de un orden mundial libre, justo y pacífico en el futuro. Inglés info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Text Universidad de San Buenaventura Cali Revista Guillermo de Ockham http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/view/6723 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/article Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. McGee, Trans.). University of Texas Press. Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act (V. Liapunov, Trans.). University of Texas Press. Brown, A. L. (2022, December 7). Angela Merkel reveals intention of Minsk agreements. Prensa Latina. https://www.prensa-latina.cu/2022/12/07/revela-angela-merkel-intencion-de-los- acuerdos-de-minsk Cohen, S. F. (2022). War with Russia?: From Putin and Ukraine to Trump and Russiagate. Hot Books. Demenchonok, E. (1983). Problemy mira i sotsial’nogo progressa v tekhnocraticheskoy ideologii [Problems of peace and social progress in tekhnocratik ideology]. In Problemy mira i sotsial’nogo progressa v sovremennoy filosofii [Problems of peace and social progress in contemporary philosophy] (pp. 209–226). Politizdat. Demenchonok, E. (1988). La “filosofía de la liberación” latinoamericana [The Latin American philosophy of liberation]. Ciencias Sociales, 1(71), 123–140. Fornet Betancourt, R. (1996). Introducción [Introduction]. In R. Fornet Betancourt (Ed.), Kultu- ren der Philosophie. Dokumentation des I. Internationalen Kongresses für interkulturelle Philosophie [Cultures of philosophy. Documentation of the I. International Congress for Intercultural Philosophy] (pp. 10–13). Verlag der Augustinus-Buchhandlung. Fornet Betancourt, R. (Ed.). (1999). Quo vadis, Philosophie? Antworten der Philosophen. Wissens- chaftsverlag Mainz in Aachen. Fornet Betancourt, R. (2016). Toward a philosophy of intercultural dialogue in a conflicted world. In E. Demenchonok (Ed.), Intercultural dialogue: In search of harmony in diversity (2nd ed., pp. 43–56). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Guseynov, A. A. (2012). Filosofiya – mysl’ i postupok [Philosophy—thought and action]. Hu- manitarian University. Horujy, S. S. (2000). O starom i novom [About the old and the new]. Aletheya. Khurshudyan, I., Sonne, P., & DeYoung, K. (2023, March 13). Ukraine short of skilled troops and munitions as losses, pessimism grow. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost. com/world/2023/03/13/ukraine-casualties-pessimism-ammunition-shortage/ Koroshiya, I. (2023, November 25). Interview with David Arakhamia, head of the Ukrainian delega- tion at the peace talks [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0G_j-7gLnWU Lavrov nazval neprimenimym printsip territorial’noy tselostnosti k kiyevskomu pravitel’stvu [La- vrov called the principle of territorial integrity inapplicable to the Kyiv government]. (2022, March 1). Interfax. https://www.interfax.ru/world/825440 Lektorsky, V. A. (2023). Philosophical reflections on humans, identity, and intercultural dialogue. In F. Dallmayr (Ed.), Dialogue and the new cosmopolitanism: Conversations with Edward De- menchonok (pp. 159–184). Lexington Books. McBride, W. L. (2010). Philosophy as global dialogue and the rejection of gratuitous military violence. In E. Demenchonok (Ed.), Philosophy after Hiroshima (pp. 419–430). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2023, August). Great power rivalries: The case for realism. Le Monde Diplomatique. https://mondediplo.com/2023/08/02great-powers Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2022, April 7). Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s comment on the new draft agreement presented by the Ukrainian side, Moscow, April 7, 2022. https://www.mid.ru/en/maps/ua/1808356/ Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2023, September 23). Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s statement at the General Debate at the 78th session of the UN General Assembly, New York, September 23, 2023. https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/1905973/ New King James Version (1982). Bible Gateway. ttps://www.biblegateway.com/versions/New-King-James-Version-NKJV-Bible/#booklist Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs (1955, July 9). Statement: The Russell-Einstein manifesto. https://pugwash.org/1955/07/09/statement-manifesto/ Romanyuk, R. (2022, May 5). Ot “kapitulyatsii” Zelenskogo do kapitulyatsii Putina. Kak idut peregovory s Rossiyey [From Zelensky’s “capitulation” to Putin’s capitulation. How are negotiations with Russia going?]. Ukrainskaya Pravda. https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/ articles/2022/05/5/7344096/ Schröder, G. (2023, October 20). Gerhard Schröder im Interview: So scheiterten die Friedensverhandlungen zwischen Ukraine und Russland [Gerhard Schröder in an interview: This is how the peace negotiations between Ukraine and Russia failed] Berliner Zeitung. https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/politik-gesellschaft/gerhard-schroeder-im-exklusiv-interviewwas-merkel-2015-gemacht-hat-war-politisch-falsch-li.2151196 Smirnov, A. V. (2019). Vse-chelovecheskoye vs Obshchechelovecheskoye. YaSK Publishing House. Smirnov, A. V. (2023). Being and process: How to “edify” “Arab reason” (and any reason at all). In F. Dallmayr (Ed.), Dialogue and the new cosmopolitanism: Conversations with Edward Demenchonok (pp. 243–255). Lexington Books. Solovyov, V. S. (1989). Works, 2 vols. (Vol. 1). Pravda. Solovyov, V. S. (1990). War, progress, and the end of history: Three conversations, including a short story of the anti-Christ (A. Bakshy, Trans.). Lindisfarne Press. Solovyov, V. S. (2010). The justification of the good: An essay on moral philosophy (R. A. Duddington, Trans.). Kessinger Publishing. Stepanyants, M. (2020). Mezhkul’turnaya filosofiya: istoki, metodologiya, problematika, perspektivy [Intercultural philosophy: Origins, methodology, problems, perspectives]. Eastern Literature. Stepanyants, M. (2023). Striving for intercultural philosophy: The contribution of Russian philosophers. In F. Dallmayr (Ed.), Dialogue and the new cosmopolitanism: Conversations with Edward Demenchonok (pp. 69–94). Lexington Books. Tolstoy, L. N. (1957). Complete works (Vol. 23). State Publishing House. Tolstoy, L. N. (2001). War and peace (A. Maude & L. Maude, Trans.). The Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/2600/pg2600-images.html#link2HCH0353 Tolstoy, L. N. (2006). The kingdom of God is within you (C. Garnett, Trans.). Dower Publications. UN General Assembly. (1970, October 24). Declaration on principles of international law concerning friendly relations and cooperation among states in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/202170?ln=en Valdai Club. (2023, October 5). Vladimir Putin meets with members of the Valdai Discussion Club. Transcript of the plenary session of the 20th Annual Meeting. https://valdaiclub.com/events/posts/articles/vladimir-putin-meets-with-members-of-the-valdai-club-transcript-2023/ Zykova, A. B. & Burgete, R. (Eds.). (1988). Iz istorii filosofii Latinskoi Ameriki XX veka [On the history of philosophy of Latin America of the XX century]. Nauka. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Edward Demenchonok - 2024 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 application/pdf text/xml Núm. 1 , Año 2024 : El mundo contemporáneo como desafío para una filosofía o un pensar intercultural Publication Intercultural dialogue hegemony Solovyov multipolarity dialogue Bakhtin interculturality Relevant philosophy Tolstoy Peace World peace Demenchonok, Edward 22 1 Journal article This article analyzes the contribution of Russian philosophy to the humanistic tradition of promoting dialogical relations and peace. It highlights the peaceful significance of Leo Tolstoy’s ethics of nonviolence, Vladimir Solovyov’s concept of omniunity, and Mikhail Bakhtin’s dialogical philosophy. Dialogue is conceived not only as communication but also as a metaphysics of personality and meaning and as dialogical relationships at the intersubjective, social, and intercultural levels. These ideas were developed in contemporary intercultural philosophy both in Russia and Latin America. The article also analyzes the obstacles to dialogical and peaceful relations, aggravated by hegemonic geopolitics. The rise of global consciousness and anti-war movements led to the end of the Cold War in 1990 and created opportunities for a positive transformation of societies and the international system. But these opportunities were torpedoed by the neoconservative “revolution” and the U.S. policy of global hegemony in a unipolar world, triggering a new Cold War and the arms race, which threaten the future of humanity. This policy resulted in NATO’s hybrid proxy war in Ukraine, which sought to inflict a “strategic defeat” on Russia. But countries that do not want to be dominated are striving for an alternative, multipolar world of independent sovereign states, based on relations of dialogue between equals and collaboration to solve social and global problems and peace. This alternative takes shape in BRICS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and other associations, based on sovereign equality, a balance of interests, and consensus. The article thus highlights the role of intercultural philosophy in promoting cultural diversity and dialogical relations and in developing a vision of a free, just, and peaceful world order in the future. war 2024-02-06T00:00:00Z https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/download/6723/5343 https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/download/6723/5342 22 2024-02-06 https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.6723 10.21500/22563202.6723 2256-3202 2024-02-06T00:00:00Z 3 |