Latin American Thinking in International Relations Reloaded

Latin American Thinking in International Relations Reloaded

In the midst of uncertainty –generated by the narratives of the decline of the United States– academics are looking for answers and cerebral stimulus in the heart of the academic Terra Incognita that is the “Global South”. Building on this interpretation, I formulate a simple question: Does a Latin American school of thought exist in International Relations? In order to respond to this question I will propose a model that will allow for an assessment of the existence of a Latin American school of thought in International Relations. Additionally, this model will enable me to distance myself from the air du temps; that is, to celebrate the existence of a school of thought before even being certain that it actually exists. For sure, the assess... Ver más

Guardado en:

Oasis

1657-7558

2346-2132

Frasson-Quenoz, Florent

UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA

10.18601/16577558.n23.04

2016-06-15

53

75

Colombia

autonomy

global south

knowledge aggregation

research enterprise

Latin american thinking in international relations

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

id e706f060695eeb91bd266aa765fe67bf
record_format ojs
spelling Latin American Thinking in International Relations Reloaded
Mansfield E. D. & Milner H. L. (1999). The new wave of regionalism. International Organization, 53 (3), 589-627.
Popper, K. (1969). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Nueva York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New-York: International Publishers.
Pastrana, E. & Vera, D. (2012). Los desafíos de Colombia frente a la proyección de Brasil como potencia regional y jugador global. In Jost, S. (ed.). Colombia: ¿una potencia en desarrollo? Escenarios y desafíos para su política exterior (pp. 613-641). Bogotá: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
Ovando Santana, C. & Aranda Bustamente, G. (2013). La autonomía en la política exterior latinoamericana: evolución y debates actuales. Pap. Polít., 18 (2). 719-742.
Onuf, N. G. (1989). World of our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. London: Routledge.
Nel, P. & Stephen, M. (2009). The foreign economic policies of regional powers in developing world. In Flemes, D. (ed.). Regional Leadership in Global system: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers (pp. 71-90). Burlington, vt: Ashgate.
Morgan, P. M. (1997). Regional Security Complexes and Regional Orders. In Lake, D. A. & Morgan, P. M. (eds.). Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World (pp. 20-44). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.
Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Mercadante, A. (2013). Brasil de Lula a Dilma (2003-2013). Buenos Aires: Capital Intelectual.
Mansfield E. D. & Milner H. L. (1997). The Political economy of Regionalism. New-York: Columbia University Press.
Puig, J. C. (1984). América Latina: políticas exteriores comparadas. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.
Lorenzini, M. E. & Pereyra Doval, M. G. (2013). Revizando los aportes de las teorías del sur: nexos entre teoría y praxis en Argentina y Brasil. Relaciones Internacionales, 22, 9-26.
Lechini, G. (2009). La cooperación Sur-Sur y la búsqueda de autonomía en América Latina: ¿Mito o realidad? Relaciones Internacionales, 12, 55-81.
Lapid, Y. (1989). The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era. International Studies Quarterly, 33 (3), 235-254.
Lakatos, I. (1971). History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions. In Buck, R.C. & Cohen, R.S. (eds.). Philosophy of Science Association 1970: In Memory of Rudolf Carnap (pp. 91-136). Dordrecht: D. Reide.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Keohane, R. O. (1988). International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32 (4), 379-396.
Joas, H. & Knöbl, W. (2009) Social Theory: Twenty Introductory Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jervis, R. (1994). Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics. Social Research, 61 (4), 853-876.
James, P. (2002). International Relations and Scientific Progress: Structural Realism Reconsidered. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Jaguaribe, H. et al. (1972). La dominación de América Latina. Buenos Aires: Amorrotu Editores.
Puig, J. C. (1980). Doctrinas internacionales y Autonomía Latinoamericana. Caracas: Instituto de Altos Estudios de América Latina, Universidad Simón Bolívar.
Rapoport, M. & Míguez, M. C. (2015). Desafíos y ejes para una inserción internacional autónoma de Argentina y América del Sur en el escenario mundial. In Briceño Ruiz, J. & Simonoff, A. (eds.). Integración y cooperación regional en América Latina: Une relectura a partir de la teoría de la autonomía (pp. 143-162). Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblios.
Graduate Institute Geneva (2015). Alumni News. Recuperado de http://graduateinstitute.ch/home/alumni/news.html/_/news/alumni/2015/firstarab-scholar-to-win-global.
Vitalis, R. (2015). White world Order, Black Power Politics: The Birth of American International Relations – The United States in the World. Nueva York: Cornell University Press.
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Weber, C. (2014). The gentrification of International Theory. Retriever from http://www.isanet.org/Publications/isq/posts/id/313/The-Gentrification-of-International-Theory
Vigevani, T. & Cepaluni, G. (2007). A política externa de Lula da Silva: a estratégia da autonomía pela diversificação. Contexto Internacional, 29 (2), 273-335.
Russell, R. & Tokatlían, J. G. (2001). De la autonomía antagónica a la autonomía relacional: una mirada teórica desde el cono sur. PostData, 7, 71-92.
Tomassini, L. (1989). Teoría y Práctica de la Política Internacional. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Católica.
Tickner, J. A. (1988). Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation. Millennium-Journal of International Studies. 17 (3), 429-440.
Tickner, A. B. & Blaney, D. L. (2012). No place for theory? Security Studies in Latin America. In Tickner, A. B. y Blaney, D. L. (eds.). Thinking International Relations Differently (pp. 92-114). Londres: Routledge.
Tickner, A. (2008). Latin American ir and the Primacy of lo práctico. International Studies Review, 10, 735-748
Tickner, A. & Wæver, O. (eds.) (2009). International Relations Scholarship Around the World (Worlding beyond the West). London: Routledge.
Tickner, A. & Blaney, D. (eds.) (2012). Thinking International Relations Differently. London: Routledge.
Soligen, E. (2008). The genesis, Design and effects of regional institutions: lessons from East Asia and the Middle East. International Studies Review, 52 (3), 261-294.
Sihls, E. (1974). “Ideology and Utopia” by Karl Mannheim. Daedalus, 103 (1), 83-89.
Sebeok, T. A. & Umiker-Sebeok, J. (1980). “You Know My Method”. A Juxtaposition of Charles S. Pierce and Sherlock Holmes. Blumington: Gaslight.
Russell, R. & Tokatlían, JG. (2002). De la autonomía antagónica a la autonomía relacional: una mirada teórica desde el cono sur. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 21, 159-194
Jackson, P. T. (2014). The “Third Debate” 25 Years Later. Recuperado de http://www.isanet.org/Publications/isq/posts/id/297/The-Third-Debate-25-Years-Later
Hamati-Ataya, I. (2011). The “Problem of Values” and International Relations Scholarship: From Applied Reflexivity to Reflexivism. International Studies Review, 13 (2), 259-287.
Frasson-Quenoz, F. (2014). África: ¿una comunidad alienada? In Frasson-Quenoz, F. (ed.). Seguridad Internacional y Ordenamientos regionales: del Complejo Regional a la Comunidad de Seguridad (Europa, África, América del Sur y América del Norte) (pp. 93-127). Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Artículo de revista
Fonseca, G. Jr. (1998). A legitimidade e outras questões internacionais. São Paulo: Paz e Terra
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/view/4525
Oasis
Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales
application/xml
text/html
application/pdf
Núm. 23 , Año 2016 : Enero-Junio
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
23
autonomy
global south
knowledge aggregation
research enterprise
Latin american thinking in international relations
Frasson-Quenoz, Florent
In the midst of uncertainty –generated by the narratives of the decline of the United States– academics are looking for answers and cerebral stimulus in the heart of the academic Terra Incognita that is the “Global South”. Building on this interpretation, I formulate a simple question: Does a Latin American school of thought exist in International Relations? In order to respond to this question I will propose a model that will allow for an assessment of the existence of a Latin American school of thought in International Relations. Additionally, this model will enable me to distance myself from the air du temps; that is, to celebrate the existence of a school of thought before even being certain that it actually exists. For sure, the assessment done here will only stand as a first attempt, and is in no way exhaustive. Nonetheless, it will allow me, firstly, to demonstrate that the eagerness to promote any kind of academic proposal to the status of “school” is detrimental to the central goal of generating knowledge and, second, to stimulate others to think about the subject along the same lines.
Español
Publication
Acharya, A. (2004). How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization, 58 (2), 239-275.
Bukharin, N. (1977 [1915]). L’économie mondiale et l’impérialisme: esquisse économique. Paris: Anthropos Buzan, B. & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Cordero Ulate, A. (2008). El paradigma inconcluso: Kuhn y la sociología en América Latina. Guatemala: FLACSO.
Cervo, A. L. (2013). Conceptos en Relaciones Internacionales. Relaciones Internacionales, 22, 149-166.
Der Derian, J. (2007). Foulcault et les Autres: rencontres critiques dans le domaine des relations internationales. Revue international des sciences sociales, 1 (191).
Devlen, B., James, P. & Özdamar, Ö. (2005). The English School, International Relations, and Progress. International Studies Review, 7, 171-197
Dias Duarte, L. F. (2005). La nature nationale : entre l’universalisme scientifique et la particularité symbolique des nations. Civilisations, 52 (2), 21-44. Recuperado de http://civilisations.revues.org/752
Cervo, A. L. (2008). Conceitos em Relações Internacionais. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 51 (2), 8-25.
Cardoso, F. E. & Faletto, E. (1978 [1969]). Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina: ensayo de interpretación sociológica. México: Siglo xxi Editores.
Bethell, L. (2009). O Brasil e a ideia de “América Latina” em perspectiva histórica. Estudos Históricos, 22 (44), 289-321.
Bernal-Meza, R. (2010). Latin American Concepts and Theories and Their Impacts on Foreign Policies. In Sombra Saraiva, F. (ed.). Concepts, Histories and Theories of International Relations for the 21th Century (pp. 131-177). Brasilia: Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais.
Dieter, H. (2009). Changing patterns of regional governance: from security to political economy? Pacific Review, 22 (1), 73-90
Dunne, T. Hansen, L. & Wight, C. (2013). The End of International Relations Theory. European Journal of International Relations, 19, 405-425.
Bello, I. y Peñas Esteban, F. J. (2013). La teoría de Relaciones Internacionales en y desde el Sur. Relaciones Internacionales, 22, 5-7.
Badie, B. (2004). L’impuissance de la puissance : Essai sur les nouvelles relations internationales. Paris: Fayard.
Escudé, C. (1992). Realismo Periférico. Buenos Aires: Editorial Planeta
Badie B. (2011). La diplomatie de connivence. Les derives oligarchiques du système international. Paris: Editions La Découverte
Acharya, A. (2011). Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule- Making in the Third World, International Studies Quarterly, 55, 95-123.
Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 10 (2), 126-155.
Journal article
Latin American Thinking in International Relations Reloaded
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/4525/9071
2016-06-15T00:00:00Z
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/4525/5453
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/4525/5200
2016-06-15T00:00:00Z
75
2016-06-15
1657-7558
2346-2132
https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n23.04
53
10.18601/16577558.n23.04
institution UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Oasis
title Latin American Thinking in International Relations Reloaded
spellingShingle Latin American Thinking in International Relations Reloaded
Frasson-Quenoz, Florent
autonomy
global south
knowledge aggregation
research enterprise
Latin american thinking in international relations
title_short Latin American Thinking in International Relations Reloaded
title_full Latin American Thinking in International Relations Reloaded
title_fullStr Latin American Thinking in International Relations Reloaded
title_full_unstemmed Latin American Thinking in International Relations Reloaded
title_sort latin american thinking in international relations reloaded
title_eng Latin American Thinking in International Relations Reloaded
description In the midst of uncertainty –generated by the narratives of the decline of the United States– academics are looking for answers and cerebral stimulus in the heart of the academic Terra Incognita that is the “Global South”. Building on this interpretation, I formulate a simple question: Does a Latin American school of thought exist in International Relations? In order to respond to this question I will propose a model that will allow for an assessment of the existence of a Latin American school of thought in International Relations. Additionally, this model will enable me to distance myself from the air du temps; that is, to celebrate the existence of a school of thought before even being certain that it actually exists. For sure, the assessment done here will only stand as a first attempt, and is in no way exhaustive. Nonetheless, it will allow me, firstly, to demonstrate that the eagerness to promote any kind of academic proposal to the status of “school” is detrimental to the central goal of generating knowledge and, second, to stimulate others to think about the subject along the same lines.
author Frasson-Quenoz, Florent
author_facet Frasson-Quenoz, Florent
topicspa_str_mv autonomy
global south
knowledge aggregation
research enterprise
Latin american thinking in international relations
topic autonomy
global south
knowledge aggregation
research enterprise
Latin american thinking in international relations
topic_facet autonomy
global south
knowledge aggregation
research enterprise
Latin american thinking in international relations
citationissue 23
citationedition Núm. 23 , Año 2016 : Enero-Junio
publisher Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales
ispartofjournal Oasis
source https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/view/4525
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
references Mansfield E. D. & Milner H. L. (1999). The new wave of regionalism. International Organization, 53 (3), 589-627.
Popper, K. (1969). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Nueva York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New-York: International Publishers.
Pastrana, E. & Vera, D. (2012). Los desafíos de Colombia frente a la proyección de Brasil como potencia regional y jugador global. In Jost, S. (ed.). Colombia: ¿una potencia en desarrollo? Escenarios y desafíos para su política exterior (pp. 613-641). Bogotá: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
Ovando Santana, C. & Aranda Bustamente, G. (2013). La autonomía en la política exterior latinoamericana: evolución y debates actuales. Pap. Polít., 18 (2). 719-742.
Onuf, N. G. (1989). World of our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. London: Routledge.
Nel, P. & Stephen, M. (2009). The foreign economic policies of regional powers in developing world. In Flemes, D. (ed.). Regional Leadership in Global system: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers (pp. 71-90). Burlington, vt: Ashgate.
Morgan, P. M. (1997). Regional Security Complexes and Regional Orders. In Lake, D. A. & Morgan, P. M. (eds.). Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World (pp. 20-44). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.
Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Mercadante, A. (2013). Brasil de Lula a Dilma (2003-2013). Buenos Aires: Capital Intelectual.
Mansfield E. D. & Milner H. L. (1997). The Political economy of Regionalism. New-York: Columbia University Press.
Puig, J. C. (1984). América Latina: políticas exteriores comparadas. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.
Lorenzini, M. E. & Pereyra Doval, M. G. (2013). Revizando los aportes de las teorías del sur: nexos entre teoría y praxis en Argentina y Brasil. Relaciones Internacionales, 22, 9-26.
Lechini, G. (2009). La cooperación Sur-Sur y la búsqueda de autonomía en América Latina: ¿Mito o realidad? Relaciones Internacionales, 12, 55-81.
Lapid, Y. (1989). The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era. International Studies Quarterly, 33 (3), 235-254.
Lakatos, I. (1971). History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions. In Buck, R.C. & Cohen, R.S. (eds.). Philosophy of Science Association 1970: In Memory of Rudolf Carnap (pp. 91-136). Dordrecht: D. Reide.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Keohane, R. O. (1988). International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32 (4), 379-396.
Joas, H. & Knöbl, W. (2009) Social Theory: Twenty Introductory Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jervis, R. (1994). Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics. Social Research, 61 (4), 853-876.
James, P. (2002). International Relations and Scientific Progress: Structural Realism Reconsidered. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Jaguaribe, H. et al. (1972). La dominación de América Latina. Buenos Aires: Amorrotu Editores.
Puig, J. C. (1980). Doctrinas internacionales y Autonomía Latinoamericana. Caracas: Instituto de Altos Estudios de América Latina, Universidad Simón Bolívar.
Rapoport, M. & Míguez, M. C. (2015). Desafíos y ejes para una inserción internacional autónoma de Argentina y América del Sur en el escenario mundial. In Briceño Ruiz, J. & Simonoff, A. (eds.). Integración y cooperación regional en América Latina: Une relectura a partir de la teoría de la autonomía (pp. 143-162). Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblios.
Graduate Institute Geneva (2015). Alumni News. Recuperado de http://graduateinstitute.ch/home/alumni/news.html/_/news/alumni/2015/firstarab-scholar-to-win-global.
Vitalis, R. (2015). White world Order, Black Power Politics: The Birth of American International Relations – The United States in the World. Nueva York: Cornell University Press.
Weber, C. (2014). The gentrification of International Theory. Retriever from http://www.isanet.org/Publications/isq/posts/id/313/The-Gentrification-of-International-Theory
Vigevani, T. & Cepaluni, G. (2007). A política externa de Lula da Silva: a estratégia da autonomía pela diversificação. Contexto Internacional, 29 (2), 273-335.
Russell, R. & Tokatlían, J. G. (2001). De la autonomía antagónica a la autonomía relacional: una mirada teórica desde el cono sur. PostData, 7, 71-92.
Tomassini, L. (1989). Teoría y Práctica de la Política Internacional. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Católica.
Tickner, J. A. (1988). Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation. Millennium-Journal of International Studies. 17 (3), 429-440.
Tickner, A. B. & Blaney, D. L. (2012). No place for theory? Security Studies in Latin America. In Tickner, A. B. y Blaney, D. L. (eds.). Thinking International Relations Differently (pp. 92-114). Londres: Routledge.
Tickner, A. (2008). Latin American ir and the Primacy of lo práctico. International Studies Review, 10, 735-748
Tickner, A. & Wæver, O. (eds.) (2009). International Relations Scholarship Around the World (Worlding beyond the West). London: Routledge.
Tickner, A. & Blaney, D. (eds.) (2012). Thinking International Relations Differently. London: Routledge.
Soligen, E. (2008). The genesis, Design and effects of regional institutions: lessons from East Asia and the Middle East. International Studies Review, 52 (3), 261-294.
Sihls, E. (1974). “Ideology and Utopia” by Karl Mannheim. Daedalus, 103 (1), 83-89.
Sebeok, T. A. & Umiker-Sebeok, J. (1980). “You Know My Method”. A Juxtaposition of Charles S. Pierce and Sherlock Holmes. Blumington: Gaslight.
Russell, R. & Tokatlían, JG. (2002). De la autonomía antagónica a la autonomía relacional: una mirada teórica desde el cono sur. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 21, 159-194
Jackson, P. T. (2014). The “Third Debate” 25 Years Later. Recuperado de http://www.isanet.org/Publications/isq/posts/id/297/The-Third-Debate-25-Years-Later
Hamati-Ataya, I. (2011). The “Problem of Values” and International Relations Scholarship: From Applied Reflexivity to Reflexivism. International Studies Review, 13 (2), 259-287.
Frasson-Quenoz, F. (2014). África: ¿una comunidad alienada? In Frasson-Quenoz, F. (ed.). Seguridad Internacional y Ordenamientos regionales: del Complejo Regional a la Comunidad de Seguridad (Europa, África, América del Sur y América del Norte) (pp. 93-127). Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Fonseca, G. Jr. (1998). A legitimidade e outras questões internacionais. São Paulo: Paz e Terra
Acharya, A. (2004). How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization, 58 (2), 239-275.
Bukharin, N. (1977 [1915]). L’économie mondiale et l’impérialisme: esquisse économique. Paris: Anthropos Buzan, B. & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Cordero Ulate, A. (2008). El paradigma inconcluso: Kuhn y la sociología en América Latina. Guatemala: FLACSO.
Cervo, A. L. (2013). Conceptos en Relaciones Internacionales. Relaciones Internacionales, 22, 149-166.
Der Derian, J. (2007). Foulcault et les Autres: rencontres critiques dans le domaine des relations internationales. Revue international des sciences sociales, 1 (191).
Devlen, B., James, P. & Özdamar, Ö. (2005). The English School, International Relations, and Progress. International Studies Review, 7, 171-197
Dias Duarte, L. F. (2005). La nature nationale : entre l’universalisme scientifique et la particularité symbolique des nations. Civilisations, 52 (2), 21-44. Recuperado de http://civilisations.revues.org/752
Cervo, A. L. (2008). Conceitos em Relações Internacionais. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 51 (2), 8-25.
Cardoso, F. E. & Faletto, E. (1978 [1969]). Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina: ensayo de interpretación sociológica. México: Siglo xxi Editores.
Bethell, L. (2009). O Brasil e a ideia de “América Latina” em perspectiva histórica. Estudos Históricos, 22 (44), 289-321.
Bernal-Meza, R. (2010). Latin American Concepts and Theories and Their Impacts on Foreign Policies. In Sombra Saraiva, F. (ed.). Concepts, Histories and Theories of International Relations for the 21th Century (pp. 131-177). Brasilia: Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais.
Dieter, H. (2009). Changing patterns of regional governance: from security to political economy? Pacific Review, 22 (1), 73-90
Dunne, T. Hansen, L. & Wight, C. (2013). The End of International Relations Theory. European Journal of International Relations, 19, 405-425.
Bello, I. y Peñas Esteban, F. J. (2013). La teoría de Relaciones Internacionales en y desde el Sur. Relaciones Internacionales, 22, 5-7.
Badie, B. (2004). L’impuissance de la puissance : Essai sur les nouvelles relations internationales. Paris: Fayard.
Escudé, C. (1992). Realismo Periférico. Buenos Aires: Editorial Planeta
Badie B. (2011). La diplomatie de connivence. Les derives oligarchiques du système international. Paris: Editions La Découverte
Acharya, A. (2011). Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule- Making in the Third World, International Studies Quarterly, 55, 95-123.
Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 10 (2), 126-155.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2016-06-15
date_accessioned 2016-06-15T00:00:00Z
date_available 2016-06-15T00:00:00Z
url https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/view/4525
url_doi https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n23.04
issn 1657-7558
eissn 2346-2132
doi 10.18601/16577558.n23.04
citationstartpage 53
citationendpage 75
url4_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/4525/9071
url3_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/4525/5453
url2_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/4525/5200
_version_ 1797157928183005184

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares