Los daños de reconocimiento secundario en el contexto de conflictos sociopolíticos: tres factores para su exclusión del discurso jurídico de justicia Transicional
Este trabajo busca explicar la razón por la cual desde la academia feminista se ha dicho que eldiscurso jurídico de justicia transicional no ha reconocido la totalidad de los daños experimentadospor las mujeres en el contexto de los conflictos sociopolíticos. Para ello, se analizarán tres factoresresponsables desde el derecho internacional y la construcción occidental del cuerpo femeninocomo uno dualista y esencialista. A partir de esta argumentación se establecerá que los daños noreconocidos usualmente por ese decurso jurídico son “daños de reconocimiento secundario”, puesno forman parte de las figuras jurídicas típicas y los discursos que anteceden a la experiencia misma.  
1692-6013
2500-8692
14
2020-07-01
85
101
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Ana Milena Coral-Diaz - 2020
id |
e59f5df068a7362b8da02a7e610f33fe |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
Los daños de reconocimiento secundario en el contexto de conflictos sociopolíticos: tres factores para su exclusión del discurso jurídico de justicia Transicional Daños de reconocimiento primario Novum Jus Universidad Catolica de Colombia Artículo de revista 2 14 Danos pelo reconhecimento primário Feminismo Direito internacional Justiça de transição Daños de reconocimiento secundario Núm. 2 , Año 2020 :Julio - diciembre Feminismo Este trabajo busca explicar la razón por la cual desde la academia feminista se ha dicho que eldiscurso jurídico de justicia transicional no ha reconocido la totalidad de los daños experimentadospor las mujeres en el contexto de los conflictos sociopolíticos. Para ello, se analizarán tres factoresresponsables desde el derecho internacional y la construcción occidental del cuerpo femeninocomo uno dualista y esencialista. A partir de esta argumentación se establecerá que los daños noreconocidos usualmente por ese decurso jurídico son “daños de reconocimiento secundario”, puesno forman parte de las figuras jurídicas típicas y los discursos que anteceden a la experiencia misma.   Justicia transicional Coral-Diaz, Ana Milena Derecho internacional Charlesworth, Hilary, and Christine Chinkin. "An Alien’s Review Of Women And Armed Conflict." In Imagining Law: Essays in Conversation with Judith Gardam, edited by Stephens Dale and Babie Paul, 171-94. South Australia: University of Adelaide Press, www.jstor.org/stable/10.20851/j.ctt1sq5x0z.12.2016. Accessed February 2, 2019. Charlesworth, Hilary, and Christine Chinkin. "An Alien’s Review Of Women And Armed Conflict." In Imagining Law: Essays in Conversation with Judith Gardam, edited by Stephens Dale and Babie Paul, 171-94. South Australia: University of Adelaide Press, 2016. Accessed February 2, 2019. www.jstor.org/stable/10.20851/j.ctt1sq5x0z.12. Doris Buss "Performing Legal Order: Some Feminist Thoughts on International Criminal Law. International Criminal Law Review 11 (2011): 409-23. European Court Of Human Rights. “Composition of the Court” https://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=court/judges&c= ( accessed December 20, 2019) Fionnuoala Ni Aolain, “Rethinking the Concept of Harm and Legal Categorizations of Sexual Violence During War”. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 1, (2009) 305. Fionnuoala Ni Aolain, F. y Catherine “Turner Gender, Truth and Transition”. UCLA Women's Law Journal, Vol. 16, (2009) pp. 229-279 Gardam, Judith, and Hilary Charlesworth. "Protection of Women in Armed Conflict." Human Rights Quarterly 22, no. 1 (2000): 148-66. Accessed February 3, 2020. www.jstor.org/stable/4489270 Henry, Nicola. "Theorizing Wartime Rape: Deconstructing Gender, Sexuality, and Violence." Gender and Society 30, no. 1 (2016): 44-56. www.jstor.org/stable/24756163 .Accessed February 3, 2020. International Court of Justice. “Current members” https://www.icj-cij.org/en/current-members ( accessed December 20, 2019) International Criminal Court. “Current Judges” https://www.icc-cpi.int/about/judicial-divisions/biographies/Pages/current-judges.aspx (Accessed December 20, 2019) Judith Gardam & Michelle Jarvis, Women and Armed Conflict: The International Response to the Beijing Platformfor Action, 32 COLUM. HUM. RTs. L. REv. 1, 56 (2000)p, 363 cited in Karima Bennoune, Do We Need New International Law to Protect Women in Armed Conflict, 38 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 363 (2007) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol38/iss2/6 Judith Gardam & Michelle Jarvis, Women, Armed Conflict and International Law, (The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2001) Karima Bennoune, Do We Need New International Law to Protect Women in Armed Conflict, 38 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 363 (2007) Karima Bennoune, Do We Need New International Law to Protect Women in Armed Conflict, 38 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 363 (2007) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol38/iss2/6 Marie Joe Frug, “A postmodern legal manifesto (An unfinished draft)”. Harvard Law Review 105 (1992) 1045-1075. Mary Joe Frug Women and the law. (Westbury, N.Y: Foundation Press, 1992) Michele Foucault El orden del discurso. (Buenos Aires: Tusquets Editores, 1992) Michelle Stanworth, Reproductive technologies: Gender, motherhood and medicine. (Cambridge: Polit, 1987) Text Michele Foucault. La voluntad del saber (Madrid Siglo XXI, 2009) Priya Pillai, “Women in International Law: A Vanishing Act?” http://opiniojuris.org/2018/12/03/women-in-international-law-a-vanishing-act/ accessed (December 20, 2019) info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 Catherine MacKinnon “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward a Feminist Jurisprudence”. Signs, 8(4), (1983) 635-658 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART Catherine O'Rourke, Gender Politics in Transitional Justice. (Routledge London, 2013) Publication Carol Smart Feminism and the power of law. (London: Routledge, 1989) text/html This work seeks to explain why feminist theory has said transitional justice legal discourse has notrecognized the totality of harms women experience in the context of socio-political conflicts. To doso, it analyzes three factors responsible for international law and the Western construction of thefemale body as dualist and essentialist. Based on this analysis, it establishes that harms not usuallyrecognized by this legal discourse are considered “harms of secondary recognition,” since they donot form part of the typical legal figures that precede the experience itself. Transitional justice International law Feminism Secondary recognition harms Primary recognition harms Journal article Ana Milena Coral-Diaz. Cuerpo Femenino en Transición, Estudio de Casos (Bogotá Universidad del Rosario, 2016) application/pdf https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/3178 Harms of secondary recognition in the Context of sociopolitical conflicts: Three factors for their exclusion from Transitional justice legal discourse Inglés https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Ana Milena Coral-Diaz - 2020 1692-6013 2500-8692 2020-07-01 https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/3178/3434 https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/3178/3521 2020-07-01T00:00:00Z 2020-07-01T00:00:00Z 10.14718/NovumJus.2020.14.2.4 85 101 https://doi.org/10.14718/NovumJus.2020.14.2.4 |
institution |
UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA |
thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADCATOLICADECOLOMBIA/logo.png |
country_str |
Colombia |
collection |
Novum Jus |
title |
Los daños de reconocimiento secundario en el contexto de conflictos sociopolíticos: tres factores para su exclusión del discurso jurídico de justicia Transicional |
spellingShingle |
Los daños de reconocimiento secundario en el contexto de conflictos sociopolíticos: tres factores para su exclusión del discurso jurídico de justicia Transicional Coral-Diaz, Ana Milena Daños de reconocimiento primario Danos pelo reconhecimento primário Feminismo Direito internacional Justiça de transição Daños de reconocimiento secundario Feminismo Justicia transicional Derecho internacional Transitional justice International law Feminism Secondary recognition harms Primary recognition harms |
title_short |
Los daños de reconocimiento secundario en el contexto de conflictos sociopolíticos: tres factores para su exclusión del discurso jurídico de justicia Transicional |
title_full |
Los daños de reconocimiento secundario en el contexto de conflictos sociopolíticos: tres factores para su exclusión del discurso jurídico de justicia Transicional |
title_fullStr |
Los daños de reconocimiento secundario en el contexto de conflictos sociopolíticos: tres factores para su exclusión del discurso jurídico de justicia Transicional |
title_full_unstemmed |
Los daños de reconocimiento secundario en el contexto de conflictos sociopolíticos: tres factores para su exclusión del discurso jurídico de justicia Transicional |
title_sort |
los daños de reconocimiento secundario en el contexto de conflictos sociopolíticos: tres factores para su exclusión del discurso jurídico de justicia transicional |
title_eng |
Harms of secondary recognition in the Context of sociopolitical conflicts: Three factors for their exclusion from Transitional justice legal discourse |
description |
Este trabajo busca explicar la razón por la cual desde la academia feminista se ha dicho que eldiscurso jurídico de justicia transicional no ha reconocido la totalidad de los daños experimentadospor las mujeres en el contexto de los conflictos sociopolíticos. Para ello, se analizarán tres factoresresponsables desde el derecho internacional y la construcción occidental del cuerpo femeninocomo uno dualista y esencialista. A partir de esta argumentación se establecerá que los daños noreconocidos usualmente por ese decurso jurídico son “daños de reconocimiento secundario”, puesno forman parte de las figuras jurídicas típicas y los discursos que anteceden a la experiencia misma.
 
|
description_eng |
This work seeks to explain why feminist theory has said transitional justice legal discourse has notrecognized the totality of harms women experience in the context of socio-political conflicts. To doso, it analyzes three factors responsible for international law and the Western construction of thefemale body as dualist and essentialist. Based on this analysis, it establishes that harms not usuallyrecognized by this legal discourse are considered “harms of secondary recognition,” since they donot form part of the typical legal figures that precede the experience itself.
|
author |
Coral-Diaz, Ana Milena |
author_facet |
Coral-Diaz, Ana Milena |
topicspa_str_mv |
Daños de reconocimiento primario Danos pelo reconhecimento primário Feminismo Direito internacional Justiça de transição Daños de reconocimiento secundario Feminismo Justicia transicional Derecho internacional |
topic |
Daños de reconocimiento primario Danos pelo reconhecimento primário Feminismo Direito internacional Justiça de transição Daños de reconocimiento secundario Feminismo Justicia transicional Derecho internacional Transitional justice International law Feminism Secondary recognition harms Primary recognition harms |
topic_facet |
Daños de reconocimiento primario Danos pelo reconhecimento primário Feminismo Direito internacional Justiça de transição Daños de reconocimiento secundario Feminismo Justicia transicional Derecho internacional Transitional justice International law Feminism Secondary recognition harms Primary recognition harms |
citationvolume |
14 |
citationissue |
2 |
citationedition |
Núm. 2 , Año 2020 :Julio - diciembre |
publisher |
Universidad Catolica de Colombia |
ispartofjournal |
Novum Jus |
source |
https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/3178 |
language |
Inglés |
format |
Article |
rights |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Ana Milena Coral-Diaz - 2020 |
references_eng |
Charlesworth, Hilary, and Christine Chinkin. "An Alien’s Review Of Women And Armed Conflict." In Imagining Law: Essays in Conversation with Judith Gardam, edited by Stephens Dale and Babie Paul, 171-94. South Australia: University of Adelaide Press, www.jstor.org/stable/10.20851/j.ctt1sq5x0z.12.2016. Accessed February 2, 2019. Charlesworth, Hilary, and Christine Chinkin. "An Alien’s Review Of Women And Armed Conflict." In Imagining Law: Essays in Conversation with Judith Gardam, edited by Stephens Dale and Babie Paul, 171-94. South Australia: University of Adelaide Press, 2016. Accessed February 2, 2019. www.jstor.org/stable/10.20851/j.ctt1sq5x0z.12. Doris Buss "Performing Legal Order: Some Feminist Thoughts on International Criminal Law. International Criminal Law Review 11 (2011): 409-23. European Court Of Human Rights. “Composition of the Court” https://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=court/judges&c= ( accessed December 20, 2019) Fionnuoala Ni Aolain, “Rethinking the Concept of Harm and Legal Categorizations of Sexual Violence During War”. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 1, (2009) 305. Fionnuoala Ni Aolain, F. y Catherine “Turner Gender, Truth and Transition”. UCLA Women's Law Journal, Vol. 16, (2009) pp. 229-279 Gardam, Judith, and Hilary Charlesworth. "Protection of Women in Armed Conflict." Human Rights Quarterly 22, no. 1 (2000): 148-66. Accessed February 3, 2020. www.jstor.org/stable/4489270 Henry, Nicola. "Theorizing Wartime Rape: Deconstructing Gender, Sexuality, and Violence." Gender and Society 30, no. 1 (2016): 44-56. www.jstor.org/stable/24756163 .Accessed February 3, 2020. International Court of Justice. “Current members” https://www.icj-cij.org/en/current-members ( accessed December 20, 2019) International Criminal Court. “Current Judges” https://www.icc-cpi.int/about/judicial-divisions/biographies/Pages/current-judges.aspx (Accessed December 20, 2019) Judith Gardam & Michelle Jarvis, Women and Armed Conflict: The International Response to the Beijing Platformfor Action, 32 COLUM. HUM. RTs. L. REv. 1, 56 (2000)p, 363 cited in Karima Bennoune, Do We Need New International Law to Protect Women in Armed Conflict, 38 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 363 (2007) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol38/iss2/6 Judith Gardam & Michelle Jarvis, Women, Armed Conflict and International Law, (The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2001) Karima Bennoune, Do We Need New International Law to Protect Women in Armed Conflict, 38 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 363 (2007) Karima Bennoune, Do We Need New International Law to Protect Women in Armed Conflict, 38 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 363 (2007) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol38/iss2/6 Marie Joe Frug, “A postmodern legal manifesto (An unfinished draft)”. Harvard Law Review 105 (1992) 1045-1075. Mary Joe Frug Women and the law. (Westbury, N.Y: Foundation Press, 1992) Michele Foucault El orden del discurso. (Buenos Aires: Tusquets Editores, 1992) Michelle Stanworth, Reproductive technologies: Gender, motherhood and medicine. (Cambridge: Polit, 1987) Michele Foucault. La voluntad del saber (Madrid Siglo XXI, 2009) Priya Pillai, “Women in International Law: A Vanishing Act?” http://opiniojuris.org/2018/12/03/women-in-international-law-a-vanishing-act/ accessed (December 20, 2019) Catherine MacKinnon “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward a Feminist Jurisprudence”. Signs, 8(4), (1983) 635-658 Catherine O'Rourke, Gender Politics in Transitional Justice. (Routledge London, 2013) Carol Smart Feminism and the power of law. (London: Routledge, 1989) Ana Milena Coral-Diaz. Cuerpo Femenino en Transición, Estudio de Casos (Bogotá Universidad del Rosario, 2016) |
type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
type_content |
Text |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
date_accessioned |
2020-07-01T00:00:00Z |
date_available |
2020-07-01T00:00:00Z |
url |
https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/3178 |
url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.14718/NovumJus.2020.14.2.4 |
issn |
1692-6013 |
eissn |
2500-8692 |
doi |
10.14718/NovumJus.2020.14.2.4 |
citationstartpage |
85 |
citationendpage |
101 |
url2_str_mv |
https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/3178/3434 |
url3_str_mv |
https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/3178/3521 |
_version_ |
1797738549790900224 |