Impacts of indirect liability regulation of intermediaries of copyright-infringing content on the internet

Impacts of indirect liability regulation of intermediaries of copyright-infringing content on the internet

Los Intermediarios de Servicios de Internet juegan un papel esencial en la discusión entre la libertad de expresión, la innovación4 y el crecimiento económico en el entorno digital5. En el ámbito de la política de Propiedad Intelectual, la regulación sobre la responsabilidad indirecta que asumen los intermediarios se enfrenta al desafío lograr preservar el interés de los titulares de los derechos de autor, pero también promover la accesibilidad a los recursos digitales. En este análisis, dos aspectos merecen especial atención. El riesgo al que se enfrentan los intermediarios como consecuencia de la fragmentación legal y las medidas legales que pueden limitar libertades en el entorno digital.

Guardado en:

Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial

1657-1959

2346-2116

Pineda Cely, Ana María

UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA

10.18601/16571959.n33.07

2022-06-15

169

203

Colombia

barreras digitales;

responsabilidad indirecta

comercio digital;

responsabilidad de puerto seguro;

información digital;

infracciones de derechos de autor;

intermediarios de servicios de internet;

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Ana María Pineda Cely - 2022

id e175c7100def7a90ca13edf4533a9b90
record_format ojs
spelling Impacts of indirect liability regulation of intermediaries of copyright-infringing content on the internet
Martinet, Beatrice and Oertli, Reinhard J. “Liability of E-Commerce Platforms for Copyright and Trademark Infringement: A World Tour”. Landslide, vol. 7, n.° 5, 2014, p. 41.
Reed, Kristina M. “From the Great Firewall of China to the Berlin Firewall: The Cost of Content Regulation on Internet Commerce Comment”. Transnational Lawyer, vol. 13, n.° 2, 2000, pp. 451-476.
Perel, Maayan and Elkin-Koren, Niva. “Accountability in Algorithmic Copyright Enforcement”. Stanford Technology Law Review, vol. 19, n.° 3, 2016, pp. 473-533.
O’Rourke, Claire. “Stepping in for the FCC: Extending the Video Privacy Protection Act to Internet Service Providers Comments”. George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, vol. 29, n.° 2, 2018, pp. 221-244.
Meltzer, Joshua P. “The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement: Developing Trade Policy for Digital Trade”. S.S.R.N. Electronic Journal, 2020.
Meltzer, Joshua P. Maximizing the Opportunities of the Internet for International Trade. E15 Expert Group on the Digital Economy – Policy Options Paper. E15Initiative. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and World Economic Forum, 2016.
Mercurio, Bryan. “Internet Service Provider Liability for Copyright Infringements of Subscribers: American and Australian Developments”. MurUEJL 51, vol. 9, n.° 4, 2002. In: http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MurUEJL/2002/51.html.
Meltzer, Joshua P. “Governing Digital Trade”. World Trade Review, vol. 18, n.° S1, 2019, pp. S23-S48.
Meltzer, Joshua P. “Digital Australia: An Economic and Trade Agenda”. Brookings, May 22, 2018.
Meade, Elizabeth. “The new NAFTA and what it means for tech companies’ liability for users’ conduct online”. The University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal, vol. 4, n.° 1, 2019, pp. 1-18.
May, Christopher. “Commodifying the Information Age: Intellectual Property Rights, the State and the Internet”. SCRIPTed: A Journal of Law, Technology and Society, vol. 1, n.° 3, 2004, pp. 408-419.
Madiega, Tambiama. Reform of the EU liability regime for online intermediaries. Background on the forthcoming digital services act. Brussels: EPRS, European Parliamentary Research Service, In-Depth Analysis, 2020.
Rentzhog, Magnus and Jonströmer, Henrik. No Transfer, No Trade. Kommerskollegium, 2014.
Lucchi, Nicola. “Internet Content Governance and Human Rights”. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, vol. 16, n.° 4, 2013, pp. 809-856.
Liu, Jiarui. “Why Is Betamax an Anachronism in the Digital Age – Erosion of the Sony Doctrine and Indirect Copyright Liability of Internet Technologies Internet”. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment Law & Practice, vol. 7, n.° 2, 2004, pp. 343-366.
Lillà Montagnani, Maria and Yordanova Trapova, Alina. “Safe Harbours in Deep Waters: A New Emerging Liability Regime for Internet Intermediaries in the Digital Single Market”. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, vol. 26, n.° 4, 2018, pp. 294-310.
Lexology. “‘Free WiFi for Free People’ - Germany restricts the liability of providers of public WiFi networks”, Octobre 31, 2017 [on line]. In: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=f3ee9ec6-a670-4b4e-b995-6342fcbc8e18
Land, Molly. “Toward an International Law of the Internet”. Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 54, n.° 2, 2013, pp. 393-458.
Hua, Jerry Jie. “Establishing Certainty of Internet Service Provider Liability and Safe Harbor Regulation”. National Taiwan University Law Review, vol. 9, n.° 1, 2014, pp. 1-47.
Hedrick, Samantha Fink. “I Think, Therefore I Create: Claiming Copyright in the Outputs of Algorithms”. New York University Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law (JIPEL), vol. 8, n.° 2, 2019, pp. 324-ss.
Hanson, RT; Reeson, A. & Staples, M. Distributed Ledgers. Scenarios for the Australian economy over the coming decades. Camberra: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, 2017.
Goodman, Matthew p. “From TPP to CPTPP”. In: CSIS. Center for Strategic & International Studies, March 8, 2018. In: https://www.csis.org/analysis/tpp-cptpp.
Gao, Henry S. “Regulation of Digital Trade in U.S. Free Trade Agreements: From Trade Regulation to Digital Regulation”. Legal Issues of Economic Integration, vol. 45, n.° 1, 2018, pp. 47-70.
Reidenberg, Joel. “The Rule of Intellectual Property Law in the Internet Economy Copyright in Context: Institute for Intellectual Property & Informational Law Symposium - Fourth Annual Baker Botts Lecture”. Houston Law Review, vol. 44, n.° 4-Symposium, 2007, pp. 1073-1095.
Sag, Matthew. “Internet Safe Harbors and the Transformation of Copyright Law”. Notre Dame Law Review, vol. 93, n.° 2, 2017, pp. 499-564.
Fefer, Rachel F. “Data Flows, Online Privacy, and Trade Policy”. Congressional Research Service Report, March 26, 2020.
WTO. Intellectual Property. “Overview: TRIPS Agreement”. In: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/intel2_e.htm.
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
WTO. Understanding the WTO. “Members and Observers”. In: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm.
WTO. Understanding the WTO. “Intellectual Property: Protection and Enforcement”. In: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm7_e.htm.
WIPO. “WCT Notification No. 2. WIPO Copyright Treaty. Signatories”. In: https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/notifications/wct/treaty_wct_2.html.
Saini, Saloni. “Liability of Internet Service Provider for Third Party Infringement of Trademark and Copyright” Latest Laws, Jan 29, 2020 [on line]. In: https://www.latestlaws.com/articles/liability-of-internet-service-provider-for-thirdparty-infringement-of-trademark-and-copyright-by-saloni-saini/
Congressional Research Service. Internet Regimes and WTO E-Commerce Negotiations (No R46198, 2020).
Commission on Telecommunications and Information Technologies. “Policy Statement Trade-Related Aspects of Electronic Commerce and Telecommunications”. International Chamber of Commerce, June 6, 2001.
Canada, Global Affairs. “About the CPTPP”. In: GAC, November 19, 2015. In: https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accordscommerciaux/agr-acc/cptpp-ptpgp/backgrounder-document_information.aspx?lang=eng.
Australian Government, Department of Foreing Affairs and Trade. “CPTPP Suspensions Explained”, Jan, 2019. In: https://www.dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/in-force/cptpp/outcomes-documents/Pages/cptpp-suspensions-explained.
World Bank. World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. The World Bank, 2016.
Weiskopf, David N. “The Risks of Copyright Infringement on the Internet: A Practitioner’s Guide”. University of San Francisco Law Review, vol. 33, n.° 1, 1998, pp. 1-58.
Toth, Andrea Katalin. “Algorithmic Copyright Enforcement and AI: Issues and Potential Solutions, through the Lens of Text and Data Mining”. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 13, n.° 2, 2019, pp. 361-387.
Thurow, Lester C. “Needed: A New System of Intellectual Property Rights”. Harvard Business Review Magazine, September/October, 1997
Thompson, Marcelo. “Beyond Gatekeeping: The Normative Responsibility of Internet Intermediaries”. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, vol. 18, n.° 4, 2015, pp. 783-848.
Shalika, Chamani. “Online Copyright Infringement and the Liability of Internet Service Providers”. SSRN Electronic Journal, October 4, 2019.
Savola, Pekka. “Proportionality of Website Blocking: Internet Connectivity Providers as Copyright Enforcers”. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, vol. 5, n.° 2, 2014, pp. 116-138.
Fitzgerald, Anne & Elidaes, Dimitrios G. Nutshell: Intellectual Property, 4th ed. Lawbook Co, 2015.
Flanagan, Anne & Maniatis, Spyros. Intellectual property on the Internet. University of London, 2008.
European Parliamentary Research Service. Comparative Law Library Unit. Copyright Law in the EU, June, 2018, p. 3.
barreras digitales;
Centro de Estudios de la Propiedad Intelectual
text/html
Artículo de revista
Núm. 33 , Año 2022 : Enero-Junio
33
responsabilidad indirecta
comercio digital;
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/7884
responsabilidad de puerto seguro;
información digital;
infracciones de derechos de autor;
intermediarios de servicios de internet;
Pineda Cely, Ana María
Los Intermediarios de Servicios de Internet juegan un papel esencial en la discusión entre la libertad de expresión, la innovación4 y el crecimiento económico en el entorno digital5. En el ámbito de la política de Propiedad Intelectual, la regulación sobre la responsabilidad indirecta que asumen los intermediarios se enfrenta al desafío lograr preservar el interés de los titulares de los derechos de autor, pero también promover la accesibilidad a los recursos digitales. En este análisis, dos aspectos merecen especial atención. El riesgo al que se enfrentan los intermediarios como consecuencia de la fragmentación legal y las medidas legales que pueden limitar libertades en el entorno digital.
Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial
application/pdf
Español
Akhtar, Shayerah Ilias; Wong, Liana & Fergusson, Ian F. “Intellectual Property Rights and International Trade”. Congressional Research Service Report, May 12, 2020.
De Miguel Asensio, Pedro A. “Internet Intermediaries and the Law Applicable to Intellectual Property Infringements”. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, vol. 3, n.° 3, 2012, pp. 350-360.
De Cock Buning, Madeleine. “Autonomous Intelligent Systems as Creative Agents under the E.U. Framework for Intellectual Property Special Issue on the Man and the Machine”. European Journal of Risk Regulation (EJRR), vol. 7, n.° 2, 2016, pp. 310-322.
Cheung, Anne & Weber, Rolf H. “Internet Governance and the Responsibility of Internet Service Providers”. Wisconsin International Law Journal, vol. 26, n.° 2, 2008, pp. 403-477.
Chatterjee, Mala and Fromer, Jeanne C. “Minds, Machines, and the Law: The Case of Volition in Copyright Law”. Columbia Law Review, vol. 119, 2019, pp. 1887-1916.
Chander, Anupam and Le, Uyen P. “Breaking the Web: Data Localization vs. The Global Internet” S.S.R.N. Electronic Journal, 2014.
Chander, Anupam. “How Law Made Silicon Valley”. Emory Law Journal, vol. 63, n.° 3, 2014, pp. 639-694.
CIGI & Royal Institute of International Affairs. Global Commission on Internet Governance. Mapping the Digital Frontiers of Trade and Intellectual Property. Research Volume Three. Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) and the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2017.
Birnhack, Michael D. “Copyright Law and Free Speech after Eldred v. Ashcroft”. Southern California Law Review, vol. 76, n.° 6, 2002, pp.1275-1330.
Australia. Department of Industry, Science and Resources. Shaping Australia’s future: innovation - framework paper / [Dept. of ] Industry, Science and Resources. Canberra: Dept. of Industry, Science and Resources, 1999 (see http://industry.gov.au/library/content_library/shaping.pdf ).
Birnhack, Michael D. “Global Copyright, Local Speech”. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, vol. 24, n.° 2, 2006, pp. 491-547.
Publication
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Ana María Pineda Cely - 2022
Digital Barriers;
The Internet Services Intermediaries play an essential role in discussing the freedom of speech, innovation1 and economic growth in the digital environment2. In the arena of the intellectual property policy, the emerging regulation on the indirect liability held by them3 has faced the challenge of adequate its system not only for preserving the interest of the copyright owners but also for promoting the accessibility to the digital recourses. In this analysis, two aspects deserve special attention: The increasing legal risk faced by the intermediaries due to the legal fragmentation and the legal measures that may limit freedom in the digital environment.
Internet Services Intermediaries;
Copyright Infringement;
Digital Information;
Safe Harbour Liability;
Digital Trade;
Indirect Liability
Journal article
Impacts of indirect liability regulation of intermediaries of copyright-infringing content on the internet
2346-2116
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/7884/12517
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/7884/12518
1657-1959
169
https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n33.07
2022-06-15
2022-06-15T11:59:03Z
203
10.18601/16571959.n33.07
2022-06-15T11:59:03Z
institution UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial
title Impacts of indirect liability regulation of intermediaries of copyright-infringing content on the internet
spellingShingle Impacts of indirect liability regulation of intermediaries of copyright-infringing content on the internet
Pineda Cely, Ana María
barreras digitales;
responsabilidad indirecta
comercio digital;
responsabilidad de puerto seguro;
información digital;
infracciones de derechos de autor;
intermediarios de servicios de internet;
Digital Barriers;
Internet Services Intermediaries;
Copyright Infringement;
Digital Information;
Safe Harbour Liability;
Digital Trade;
Indirect Liability
title_short Impacts of indirect liability regulation of intermediaries of copyright-infringing content on the internet
title_full Impacts of indirect liability regulation of intermediaries of copyright-infringing content on the internet
title_fullStr Impacts of indirect liability regulation of intermediaries of copyright-infringing content on the internet
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of indirect liability regulation of intermediaries of copyright-infringing content on the internet
title_sort impacts of indirect liability regulation of intermediaries of copyright-infringing content on the internet
title_eng Impacts of indirect liability regulation of intermediaries of copyright-infringing content on the internet
description Los Intermediarios de Servicios de Internet juegan un papel esencial en la discusión entre la libertad de expresión, la innovación4 y el crecimiento económico en el entorno digital5. En el ámbito de la política de Propiedad Intelectual, la regulación sobre la responsabilidad indirecta que asumen los intermediarios se enfrenta al desafío lograr preservar el interés de los titulares de los derechos de autor, pero también promover la accesibilidad a los recursos digitales. En este análisis, dos aspectos merecen especial atención. El riesgo al que se enfrentan los intermediarios como consecuencia de la fragmentación legal y las medidas legales que pueden limitar libertades en el entorno digital.
description_eng The Internet Services Intermediaries play an essential role in discussing the freedom of speech, innovation1 and economic growth in the digital environment2. In the arena of the intellectual property policy, the emerging regulation on the indirect liability held by them3 has faced the challenge of adequate its system not only for preserving the interest of the copyright owners but also for promoting the accessibility to the digital recourses. In this analysis, two aspects deserve special attention: The increasing legal risk faced by the intermediaries due to the legal fragmentation and the legal measures that may limit freedom in the digital environment.
author Pineda Cely, Ana María
author_facet Pineda Cely, Ana María
topicspa_str_mv barreras digitales;
responsabilidad indirecta
comercio digital;
responsabilidad de puerto seguro;
información digital;
infracciones de derechos de autor;
intermediarios de servicios de internet;
topic barreras digitales;
responsabilidad indirecta
comercio digital;
responsabilidad de puerto seguro;
información digital;
infracciones de derechos de autor;
intermediarios de servicios de internet;
Digital Barriers;
Internet Services Intermediaries;
Copyright Infringement;
Digital Information;
Safe Harbour Liability;
Digital Trade;
Indirect Liability
topic_facet barreras digitales;
responsabilidad indirecta
comercio digital;
responsabilidad de puerto seguro;
información digital;
infracciones de derechos de autor;
intermediarios de servicios de internet;
Digital Barriers;
Internet Services Intermediaries;
Copyright Infringement;
Digital Information;
Safe Harbour Liability;
Digital Trade;
Indirect Liability
citationissue 33
citationedition Núm. 33 , Año 2022 : Enero-Junio
publisher Centro de Estudios de la Propiedad Intelectual
ispartofjournal Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial
source https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/7884
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Ana María Pineda Cely - 2022
references Martinet, Beatrice and Oertli, Reinhard J. “Liability of E-Commerce Platforms for Copyright and Trademark Infringement: A World Tour”. Landslide, vol. 7, n.° 5, 2014, p. 41.
Reed, Kristina M. “From the Great Firewall of China to the Berlin Firewall: The Cost of Content Regulation on Internet Commerce Comment”. Transnational Lawyer, vol. 13, n.° 2, 2000, pp. 451-476.
Perel, Maayan and Elkin-Koren, Niva. “Accountability in Algorithmic Copyright Enforcement”. Stanford Technology Law Review, vol. 19, n.° 3, 2016, pp. 473-533.
O’Rourke, Claire. “Stepping in for the FCC: Extending the Video Privacy Protection Act to Internet Service Providers Comments”. George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, vol. 29, n.° 2, 2018, pp. 221-244.
Meltzer, Joshua P. “The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement: Developing Trade Policy for Digital Trade”. S.S.R.N. Electronic Journal, 2020.
Meltzer, Joshua P. Maximizing the Opportunities of the Internet for International Trade. E15 Expert Group on the Digital Economy – Policy Options Paper. E15Initiative. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and World Economic Forum, 2016.
Mercurio, Bryan. “Internet Service Provider Liability for Copyright Infringements of Subscribers: American and Australian Developments”. MurUEJL 51, vol. 9, n.° 4, 2002. In: http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MurUEJL/2002/51.html.
Meltzer, Joshua P. “Governing Digital Trade”. World Trade Review, vol. 18, n.° S1, 2019, pp. S23-S48.
Meltzer, Joshua P. “Digital Australia: An Economic and Trade Agenda”. Brookings, May 22, 2018.
Meade, Elizabeth. “The new NAFTA and what it means for tech companies’ liability for users’ conduct online”. The University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal, vol. 4, n.° 1, 2019, pp. 1-18.
May, Christopher. “Commodifying the Information Age: Intellectual Property Rights, the State and the Internet”. SCRIPTed: A Journal of Law, Technology and Society, vol. 1, n.° 3, 2004, pp. 408-419.
Madiega, Tambiama. Reform of the EU liability regime for online intermediaries. Background on the forthcoming digital services act. Brussels: EPRS, European Parliamentary Research Service, In-Depth Analysis, 2020.
Rentzhog, Magnus and Jonströmer, Henrik. No Transfer, No Trade. Kommerskollegium, 2014.
Lucchi, Nicola. “Internet Content Governance and Human Rights”. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, vol. 16, n.° 4, 2013, pp. 809-856.
Liu, Jiarui. “Why Is Betamax an Anachronism in the Digital Age – Erosion of the Sony Doctrine and Indirect Copyright Liability of Internet Technologies Internet”. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment Law & Practice, vol. 7, n.° 2, 2004, pp. 343-366.
Lillà Montagnani, Maria and Yordanova Trapova, Alina. “Safe Harbours in Deep Waters: A New Emerging Liability Regime for Internet Intermediaries in the Digital Single Market”. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, vol. 26, n.° 4, 2018, pp. 294-310.
Lexology. “‘Free WiFi for Free People’ - Germany restricts the liability of providers of public WiFi networks”, Octobre 31, 2017 [on line]. In: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=f3ee9ec6-a670-4b4e-b995-6342fcbc8e18
Land, Molly. “Toward an International Law of the Internet”. Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 54, n.° 2, 2013, pp. 393-458.
Hua, Jerry Jie. “Establishing Certainty of Internet Service Provider Liability and Safe Harbor Regulation”. National Taiwan University Law Review, vol. 9, n.° 1, 2014, pp. 1-47.
Hedrick, Samantha Fink. “I Think, Therefore I Create: Claiming Copyright in the Outputs of Algorithms”. New York University Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law (JIPEL), vol. 8, n.° 2, 2019, pp. 324-ss.
Hanson, RT; Reeson, A. & Staples, M. Distributed Ledgers. Scenarios for the Australian economy over the coming decades. Camberra: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, 2017.
Goodman, Matthew p. “From TPP to CPTPP”. In: CSIS. Center for Strategic & International Studies, March 8, 2018. In: https://www.csis.org/analysis/tpp-cptpp.
Gao, Henry S. “Regulation of Digital Trade in U.S. Free Trade Agreements: From Trade Regulation to Digital Regulation”. Legal Issues of Economic Integration, vol. 45, n.° 1, 2018, pp. 47-70.
Reidenberg, Joel. “The Rule of Intellectual Property Law in the Internet Economy Copyright in Context: Institute for Intellectual Property & Informational Law Symposium - Fourth Annual Baker Botts Lecture”. Houston Law Review, vol. 44, n.° 4-Symposium, 2007, pp. 1073-1095.
Sag, Matthew. “Internet Safe Harbors and the Transformation of Copyright Law”. Notre Dame Law Review, vol. 93, n.° 2, 2017, pp. 499-564.
Fefer, Rachel F. “Data Flows, Online Privacy, and Trade Policy”. Congressional Research Service Report, March 26, 2020.
WTO. Intellectual Property. “Overview: TRIPS Agreement”. In: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/intel2_e.htm.
WTO. Understanding the WTO. “Members and Observers”. In: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm.
WTO. Understanding the WTO. “Intellectual Property: Protection and Enforcement”. In: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm7_e.htm.
WIPO. “WCT Notification No. 2. WIPO Copyright Treaty. Signatories”. In: https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/notifications/wct/treaty_wct_2.html.
Saini, Saloni. “Liability of Internet Service Provider for Third Party Infringement of Trademark and Copyright” Latest Laws, Jan 29, 2020 [on line]. In: https://www.latestlaws.com/articles/liability-of-internet-service-provider-for-thirdparty-infringement-of-trademark-and-copyright-by-saloni-saini/
Congressional Research Service. Internet Regimes and WTO E-Commerce Negotiations (No R46198, 2020).
Commission on Telecommunications and Information Technologies. “Policy Statement Trade-Related Aspects of Electronic Commerce and Telecommunications”. International Chamber of Commerce, June 6, 2001.
Canada, Global Affairs. “About the CPTPP”. In: GAC, November 19, 2015. In: https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accordscommerciaux/agr-acc/cptpp-ptpgp/backgrounder-document_information.aspx?lang=eng.
Australian Government, Department of Foreing Affairs and Trade. “CPTPP Suspensions Explained”, Jan, 2019. In: https://www.dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/in-force/cptpp/outcomes-documents/Pages/cptpp-suspensions-explained.
World Bank. World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. The World Bank, 2016.
Weiskopf, David N. “The Risks of Copyright Infringement on the Internet: A Practitioner’s Guide”. University of San Francisco Law Review, vol. 33, n.° 1, 1998, pp. 1-58.
Toth, Andrea Katalin. “Algorithmic Copyright Enforcement and AI: Issues and Potential Solutions, through the Lens of Text and Data Mining”. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 13, n.° 2, 2019, pp. 361-387.
Thurow, Lester C. “Needed: A New System of Intellectual Property Rights”. Harvard Business Review Magazine, September/October, 1997
Thompson, Marcelo. “Beyond Gatekeeping: The Normative Responsibility of Internet Intermediaries”. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, vol. 18, n.° 4, 2015, pp. 783-848.
Shalika, Chamani. “Online Copyright Infringement and the Liability of Internet Service Providers”. SSRN Electronic Journal, October 4, 2019.
Savola, Pekka. “Proportionality of Website Blocking: Internet Connectivity Providers as Copyright Enforcers”. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, vol. 5, n.° 2, 2014, pp. 116-138.
Fitzgerald, Anne & Elidaes, Dimitrios G. Nutshell: Intellectual Property, 4th ed. Lawbook Co, 2015.
Flanagan, Anne & Maniatis, Spyros. Intellectual property on the Internet. University of London, 2008.
European Parliamentary Research Service. Comparative Law Library Unit. Copyright Law in the EU, June, 2018, p. 3.
Akhtar, Shayerah Ilias; Wong, Liana & Fergusson, Ian F. “Intellectual Property Rights and International Trade”. Congressional Research Service Report, May 12, 2020.
De Miguel Asensio, Pedro A. “Internet Intermediaries and the Law Applicable to Intellectual Property Infringements”. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, vol. 3, n.° 3, 2012, pp. 350-360.
De Cock Buning, Madeleine. “Autonomous Intelligent Systems as Creative Agents under the E.U. Framework for Intellectual Property Special Issue on the Man and the Machine”. European Journal of Risk Regulation (EJRR), vol. 7, n.° 2, 2016, pp. 310-322.
Cheung, Anne & Weber, Rolf H. “Internet Governance and the Responsibility of Internet Service Providers”. Wisconsin International Law Journal, vol. 26, n.° 2, 2008, pp. 403-477.
Chatterjee, Mala and Fromer, Jeanne C. “Minds, Machines, and the Law: The Case of Volition in Copyright Law”. Columbia Law Review, vol. 119, 2019, pp. 1887-1916.
Chander, Anupam and Le, Uyen P. “Breaking the Web: Data Localization vs. The Global Internet” S.S.R.N. Electronic Journal, 2014.
Chander, Anupam. “How Law Made Silicon Valley”. Emory Law Journal, vol. 63, n.° 3, 2014, pp. 639-694.
CIGI & Royal Institute of International Affairs. Global Commission on Internet Governance. Mapping the Digital Frontiers of Trade and Intellectual Property. Research Volume Three. Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) and the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2017.
Birnhack, Michael D. “Copyright Law and Free Speech after Eldred v. Ashcroft”. Southern California Law Review, vol. 76, n.° 6, 2002, pp.1275-1330.
Australia. Department of Industry, Science and Resources. Shaping Australia’s future: innovation - framework paper / [Dept. of ] Industry, Science and Resources. Canberra: Dept. of Industry, Science and Resources, 1999 (see http://industry.gov.au/library/content_library/shaping.pdf ).
Birnhack, Michael D. “Global Copyright, Local Speech”. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, vol. 24, n.° 2, 2006, pp. 491-547.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2022-06-15
date_accessioned 2022-06-15T11:59:03Z
date_available 2022-06-15T11:59:03Z
url https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/7884
url_doi https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n33.07
issn 1657-1959
eissn 2346-2116
doi 10.18601/16571959.n33.07
citationstartpage 169
citationendpage 203
url2_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/7884/12517
url3_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/7884/12518
_version_ 1797157787640266752

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares