Deliberative, Republican, and Egalitarian Institutional Alternatives for Popular Constitutionalism

Deliberative, Republican, and Egalitarian Institutional Alternatives for Popular Constitutionalism

Este artículo examina y propone alternativas institucionales para el constitucionalismo popular. La propuesta es una combinación progresiva de instituciones que buscan dotar a la ciudadanía con el poder final para determinar qué significa una constitución, contribuyendo a asegurar su libertad republicana, implementando mecanismos de deliberación, al tiempo que es respetuoso de una forma particular de comprender la igualdad política. El artículo comienza con una descripción del constitucionalismo popular y de los principios que considero que deberían fundamentar la teoría. Luego, procede a examinar críticamente diversas propuestas institucionales presentes en la literatura. Después de mostrar las áreas en las que dichas propuestas se quedan... Ver más

Guardado en:

Revista Derecho del Estado

0122-9893

2346-2051

Bello Hutt, Donald

UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA

10.18601/01229893.n48.07

2020-12-07

183

214

Colombia

equidad política

deliberación;

diseño institucional;

republicanismo;

Constitucionalismo popular;

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

Donald Bello Hutt - 2020

id e03c3b8c7b14da5745848f2d1003fb7a
record_format ojs
spelling Deliberative, Republican, and Egalitarian Institutional Alternatives for Popular Constitutionalism
Oliver-Lalana, Daniel. ¿Le importa a alguien que los legisladores razonen? Sobre el análisis y el control del debate parlamentario de las leyes. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa 57 (2), 2016: 5-37.
Mansbridge, Jane et al. The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1), 2010: 64-100.
Marcilla, Gema. Balancing as a Guide to Legislative Reasoning. Legisprudence 4 (1), 2010: 93-104.
Marmor, Andrei. The Language of Law. oup, Oxford, 2014.
Martí, José Luis. La república deliberativa. Marcial Pons, Madrid, 2006.
McCormick, John. Machiavellian Democracy. cup, Cambridge, 2011.
Miller, David. Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice. Political Studies 40 (1), 1992: 54-67.
Oliver-Lalana, Daniel. Foreword: Towards a Theory of Legislative Argument. Legisprudence 4 (1), 2010: 3-12.
Manin, Bernard. The Principles of Representative Government. cup, Cambridge, 1997.
Ovejero Lucas, Félix. La libertad inhóspita. Modelos humanos y democracia liberal. Paidós, Barcelona, 2002.
Parkinson, John. Deliberating in the Real World. oup, Oxford, 2006.
Pettit, Philip. On the People’s Terms: A reply to five critiques. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (crispp) 18 (6), 2015: 687-696.
Pettit, Philip. On the People’s Terms. A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. cup, Cambridge, 2012.
Pettit, Philip. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1997.
Pintore, Anna. Democrazia e diritti. Sette studi analitici. Edizioni ets, Pisa, 2010.
Mansbridge, Jane et al. A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In John Parkinson & Jane Mansbridge (eds.). Deliberative systems: deliberative democracy at the large scale. Theories of Institutional Design, cup, Cambridge, 2012, 1-26.
Manin, Bernard. On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation. Political Theory 15 (3), 1987: 338-368.
Post, Robert & Reva Siegel. Democratic Constitutionalism. In Jack Balkin & Reva Siegel (eds.). The Constitution in 2020. oup, Oxford, 2009, 25-34.
Hogg , Peter W. & Allison A. Bushell. El Diálogo de la Carta Entre Tribunales y las Legislaturas. Revista Argentina de Teoría Juridica 14 (2), (2013).
Gutmann, Amy & Dennis Thompson. Democracy and Disagreement. The Belknap Press of HUP, Cambridge, Massachusetts & London ,1996.
Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. The mit Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996.
Habermas, Jürgen. Justification and Application. Remarks on Discourse Ethics. The mit Press, Massachussets & London, 1993.
Hanssen, Andrew F. The Political Economy of Judicial Selection: Theory and Evidence. Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy 9 (3), 1999: 413-424.
Hendriks, Carolyn M. Consensus Conferences and Planning Cells. Lay Citizen Deliberations. In John Gastil & Peter Levine (eds.). The Deliberative Democracy Handbook. Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 2005: 80-110
Hiebert L., Janet. Parliamentary Bills of Rights: An Alternative Model?. The Modern Law Review 69 (1), 2006: 7-28.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Hacket Publishing, Indianapolis & Cambridge, 1996.
Madison, James. Who Are the Best Keepers of the People’s Liberties?. In Ralph Ketcham (ed.), Selected Writings of James Madison. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis/Cambridge, 2006, 227-229.
Kant, Immanuel. Toward Perpetual Peace. In Pauline Kleingeld ed.). Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History. yup, New Haven & London 2006, 67-109.
Knowles, Helen J. & Julianne A. Toia. Defining ‘Popular Constitutionalism: The Kramer versus Kramer Problem. Southern University Law Review 42 (1), 2014: 31-59.
Kramer, Larry. “The Interest of the Man”: James Madison, Popular Constitutionalism, and the Theory of Deliberative Democracy.” Valparaiso Law Review 41 (2), 2007: 697-754.
Kramer, Larry. The People Themselves. Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. OUP, Oxford, 2004a.
Larmore, Charles. A Critique of Philip Pettit’s Republicanism. Philosophical Issues, 2001: 229-243.
Lorenzetti, Ricardo. Las Audiencias Públicas y la Corte Suprema. Revista Argentina de Teoría Política 14 (2), 2013.
Lovett, Frank. “Republicanism.” Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 10 11 2014, http://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-in/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=republicanism.
Pitkin, Hanna. The Concept of Representation. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1967.
Pozen, David. Judicial Elections as Popular Constitutionalism. Columbia Law Review 110, 2010 2047-2134.
Gargarella, Roberto. La justicia frente al gobierno. Sobre el carácter contramayoritario del poder judicial. Ariel, Barcelona, 1996.
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Waldron, Jeremy. Political Political Theory. hup, Cambridge, Massachusetts: 2016.
Waldron, Jeremy. Representative Lawmaking. Boston University Law Review 89 (2009): 335-355.
Waldron, Jeremy. The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review. The Yale Law Journal, 115 (2006): 1346-1406.
Waldron, Jeremy. The Dignity of Legislation. cup, Cambridge, 1999.
Wintgens, Luc J. Legisprudence as a New Theory of Legislation. Ratio Juris 19 (1), 2006: 1-25.
Zietlow, Rebecca E. Popular Originalism? The Tea Party Movement and Constitutional Theory. Florida Law Review 64 (2), 2012: 483-512.
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. pup, Princeton, 1999.
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Urbinati, Nadia. Representation as Advocacy. Political Theory 28 (6), 2000: 758-786.
Tushnet, Mark. Non-Judicial Review. Harvard Journal on Legislation 40 (2003): 453- 92.
Rehg , William. Translator’s Introduction. In Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, The mit Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996, ix-xliii
Schmidt, Christopher. The Tea Party and the Constitution. 2011. The Tea Party and the Constitution. Available at: http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/fac_schol/546
Rodríguez Garavito, César. El Activismo Dialógico y el Impacto de los Fallos Sobre Derechos Sociales. Revista Argentina de Teoría Jurídica 14 (2), 2013: 211-244.
Ryan, Matthew & Graham Smith. “Defining Mini-publics”. In Kimmo Grönlund, André Bächtiger & Maija Setälä (eds.). Deliberative mini-publics. Involving citizens in the democratic process, ecpr Press, Colchester, 2014, 9-26
Sanders, Lynn. Poll Envy: An Assessment of Deliberative Polling. The Good Society 9, (1), 1999: 9-14.
Schäfer, Andreas. Deliberation in representative institutions: an analytical framework for a systemic approach. Australian Journal of Political Science, 2017: 1-17.
Schk ade, David, Cass R. Sunstein & Reid Hastie. When Deliberation Produces Extremism. Critical Review 2010: 227-252.
Schlink, Bernhard. Proportionality in Constitutional Law: Why everywhere but here. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 22 (2012): 291-302.
Schwartzberg, Melissa. Should Progressive Constitutionalism Embrace Popular Constitutionalism?, Ohio State Law Journal 72 (6), 2011, 1295-1316.
Tschentscher, Axel, André Bächtiger, Jürg Steiner & Marco Steenbergen. Deliberation in Parliaments. Research Objectives and Prelminary Results of the Bern Center for Interdisciplinary Deliberation Studies (bids). Legisprudence 4 (1), 2010: 13-34.
Sebastián, Linares. Justicia dialógica interinstitucional: de lege ferenda y de lege lata. Revista Argentina de Teoría Jurídica 14 (2), 2013.
Sieckmann, Jan. Legislative Argumentation and Democratic Legitimation. Legisprudence 4 (1), 2010: 69-91.
Skinner, Quentin. A Third Concept of Liberty. Proceedings of the British Academy, 2002: 237-268.
Skinner, Quentin. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. cup, Cambridge, 2008.
Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. cup, Cambridge, 1998.
Sunstein, Cass. The Law of Group Polarization. The Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2), 2002: 175-195.
Sydney, Algernon. Discourses Concerning Government. Edited by Thomas G. West, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, 1698.
Gosh, Eric. Deliberative Democracy and the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: Considering Constitutional Juries. ojls 30 (2), 2010: 327-359.
Goodin, Robert E. & John S. Dryzek. Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics. Politics & Society 34 2, 2006: 219-244.
Gargarella, Roberto. El nuevo constitutionalismo dialógico, frente al sistema de pesos y contrapesos. Revista Argentina de Teoría Jurídica 14 (2), 2013: 356-362.
Departamento de Derecho Constitucional
Bächtiger, André, Maija Setäla & Gröndlund. Towards a New Era of Deliberative Mini-Publics. In Grönlund, Kimmo, André Bächtiger & Setälä, Maija (eds.). Deliberative Mini-Publics. Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, ecpr Press, Colchester, 2014: 225-245.
Atria, Fernando. Revisión judicial: el síndrome de la víctima insatisfecha. Estudios Públicos, 2000: 347-402.
Alterio, Ana Micaela & Niembro, Roberto. Constitucionalismo popular en Latinoamérica, México DF: Porrúa, 2013.
Alexy, Robert. On Balancing and Subsumption. A Structural Comparison. Ratio Juris 16: 4, 2003b: 433-449.
Alexy, Robert. Constitutional Rights, Balancing and Rationality. Ratio Juris, 16: 2, 2003a: 131-140.
Ackerman, Bruce y James S. Fishk in. Deliberation Day, yup, New Haven & London, 2004.
Gardbaum, Stephen. The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism. Theory and Practice. cup, Cambridge, 2013.
Donald Bello Hutt - 2020
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Español
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/6960
Revista Derecho del Estado
text/html
Beatty, David M. The Ultimate Rule of Law. OUP, Oxford, 2005.
application/xml
application/pdf
Artículo de revista
Núm. 48 , Año 2021 : Enero-Abril
48
equidad política
deliberación;
diseño institucional;
republicanismo;
Constitucionalismo popular;
Bello Hutt, Donald
Este artículo examina y propone alternativas institucionales para el constitucionalismo popular. La propuesta es una combinación progresiva de instituciones que buscan dotar a la ciudadanía con el poder final para determinar qué significa una constitución, contribuyendo a asegurar su libertad republicana, implementando mecanismos de deliberación, al tiempo que es respetuoso de una forma particular de comprender la igualdad política. El artículo comienza con una descripción del constitucionalismo popular y de los principios que considero que deberían fundamentar la teoría. Luego, procede a examinar críticamente diversas propuestas institucionales presentes en la literatura. Después de mostrar las áreas en las que dichas propuestas se quedan cortas en el esfuerzo de encarnar los principios aquí defendidos, el artículo aboga por la implementación de cuatro mecanismos que, según sostendré, sí se acercan más a dichos objetivos.
Barak, Aharon. Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations, cup, Cambridge, 2012.
Publication
Beaumont, Elizabeth. The Civic Constitution: Civic Visions and Struggles in the Path Toward Constitutional Democracy, OUP, Oxford, 2014.
Gardbaum, Stephen. Reassessing the new Commonwealth model of constitutionalism. Icon 8, 2010: 167-206.
Fishk in, James S. The Voice of the People. Public Opinion and Democracy. YUP, New Haven, 1997.
Fishk in, James S. & Robert C. Luskin. The Quest for Deliberative Democracy. In Michael Saward (ed.). Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Representation and Association Routledge, London, 2000, 17-28.
Bellamy, Richard. Political Constitutionalism. A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy, cup, Cambridge, 2007.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., Fay Lomax Cook & R. Lawrence Jakobs . Public Deliberations, Discursive Participation and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Annual Review of Political Science 7 (1), 2004: 315-344.
Dahl, Robert. Democracy and its Critics. yup, New Haven & London, 1989.
Couso, Javier A. The Politics of Judicial Review in Chile in the Era of Domestic Transition, 1990-2002. In Siri Gloppen, Roberto Gargarella & Elin Skaar (eds.). Democratization and the Judiciary. The Accoountability Function of Courts in New Democracies, Frank Cass, New York, 2005, 70-91.
Cohen, Joshua. Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In James Bohman & William Rehg (eds.). Deliberative Democracy, The mit Press, Cambridge, Massachusets & London.1998, 67-92.
Chambers, Simone. Deliberative Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 6, 2003: 307-326.
Fishk in, James & Cynthia Farrar. Deliberative Polling. From Experiment to Community Resource. In John Gastil & Peter Levine (eds.). The Deliberative Democracy Handbook.
Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century, Jossey - Bass, San Francisco, 2005, 68-79.
Chambers, Simone. Deliberation and Mass Democracy. In John Parkinson & Jane Mansbridge (eds.), Deliberative Systems. Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, cup, Cambridge, 2012: 53-71.
Friedman, Barry. Mediated Popular Constitutionalism. Michigan Law Review 101 (8), 2003: 2596-2636.
Donnelly, Tom. Making Popular Constitutionalism Work. Wisconsin Law Review 2012: 159-194.
Calvert, Aubin & Mark E. Warren. Deliberative Democracy and Framing Effects: Why Frames are a Problem and How Deiberative MIni-Publics MIight Overcome Them. In Grönlund, Kimmo, André Bächtiger & Setälä, Maija (eds.). Deliberative Mini-Publics. Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, ecpr Press, Colchester, 2014: 203-223.
Button, Mark & David Michael Ryfe. What can we Learn from the Practice of Deliberative Democracy?. In John Gastil & Petter Levine (eds.). The Deliberative Democracy Handbook. Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco: 2005: 20-33.
Boswell, John, Carolyn M. Hendriks & Selen A. Ercan. Message received? Examining transmission in Deliberative Systems. Critical Policy Studies 10 (3), 2016: 263-283.
Fung, Archon. Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences. The Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (3), 203: 338-367.
Bonneau, Chris W. & Gann Hall, Melinda. In Defense of Judicial Elections. Routledge, New York, 2009.
Bohman, James. Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (4) (1998): 400-425.
Bohman, James. Representation in the deliberative system. In John Parkinson and Jane Mansbridge (eds.), Deliberative Systems. Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, cup, Cambridge, 2012: 72-94.
Bohman, James. Public Deliberation. Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. The mit Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, 1996.
Bohman, James. Epistemic Value and Deliberative Democracy. The Good Society 18 (2) (2009): 28-34.
Bello, Donald E. Republicanism, Deliberative Democracy, and Equality of Access and Deliberation, Theoria (Wiley) 84 (1), 2018: 83-111.
Bello, Donald E. Deliberation and Courts: The Role of the Judiciary in a Deliberative System, Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 152 (64), 2017b: 77-103
Bello, Donald E. Against Judicial Supremacy in Constitutional Interpretation 31 (2017a): 7-28.
Elster, Jon. Introduction. In Jon Elster, (ed.) Deliberative Democracy. CUP, Cambridge, 1998, 1-18.
republicanisms;
Journal article
deliberation;
institutional design;
Popular constitutionalism;
This article examines and proposes institutional instantiations for popular constitutionalism. The proposal is a progressive combination of institutions aiming at giving the citizenry the opportunity to determine what a constitution means, contributing to securing their liberty in a republican sense, implementing mechanisms of deliberation, and being respectful to a particular understanding of political equality. It first describes popular constitutionalism and the principles I believe should ground it. It then moves on to scrutinize sundry institutional alternatives available in the literature. After showing the areas where those proposals fall short of instantiating the principles here championed, the article argues for the implementation of four mechanisms that, I argue, do incarnate those principles.
Deliberative, Republican, and Egalitarian Institutional Alternatives for Popular Constitutionalism
political equality.
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/6960/9864
2020-12-07
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/6960/9795
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/6960/9525
2020-12-07T14:09:25Z
2020-12-07T14:09:25Z
0122-9893
2346-2051
10.18601/01229893.n48.07
https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n48.07
183
214
institution UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista Derecho del Estado
title Deliberative, Republican, and Egalitarian Institutional Alternatives for Popular Constitutionalism
spellingShingle Deliberative, Republican, and Egalitarian Institutional Alternatives for Popular Constitutionalism
Bello Hutt, Donald
equidad política
deliberación;
diseño institucional;
republicanismo;
Constitucionalismo popular;
republicanisms;
deliberation;
institutional design;
Popular constitutionalism;
political equality.
title_short Deliberative, Republican, and Egalitarian Institutional Alternatives for Popular Constitutionalism
title_full Deliberative, Republican, and Egalitarian Institutional Alternatives for Popular Constitutionalism
title_fullStr Deliberative, Republican, and Egalitarian Institutional Alternatives for Popular Constitutionalism
title_full_unstemmed Deliberative, Republican, and Egalitarian Institutional Alternatives for Popular Constitutionalism
title_sort deliberative, republican, and egalitarian institutional alternatives for popular constitutionalism
title_eng Deliberative, Republican, and Egalitarian Institutional Alternatives for Popular Constitutionalism
description Este artículo examina y propone alternativas institucionales para el constitucionalismo popular. La propuesta es una combinación progresiva de instituciones que buscan dotar a la ciudadanía con el poder final para determinar qué significa una constitución, contribuyendo a asegurar su libertad republicana, implementando mecanismos de deliberación, al tiempo que es respetuoso de una forma particular de comprender la igualdad política. El artículo comienza con una descripción del constitucionalismo popular y de los principios que considero que deberían fundamentar la teoría. Luego, procede a examinar críticamente diversas propuestas institucionales presentes en la literatura. Después de mostrar las áreas en las que dichas propuestas se quedan cortas en el esfuerzo de encarnar los principios aquí defendidos, el artículo aboga por la implementación de cuatro mecanismos que, según sostendré, sí se acercan más a dichos objetivos.
description_eng This article examines and proposes institutional instantiations for popular constitutionalism. The proposal is a progressive combination of institutions aiming at giving the citizenry the opportunity to determine what a constitution means, contributing to securing their liberty in a republican sense, implementing mechanisms of deliberation, and being respectful to a particular understanding of political equality. It first describes popular constitutionalism and the principles I believe should ground it. It then moves on to scrutinize sundry institutional alternatives available in the literature. After showing the areas where those proposals fall short of instantiating the principles here championed, the article argues for the implementation of four mechanisms that, I argue, do incarnate those principles.
author Bello Hutt, Donald
author_facet Bello Hutt, Donald
topicspa_str_mv equidad política
deliberación;
diseño institucional;
republicanismo;
Constitucionalismo popular;
topic equidad política
deliberación;
diseño institucional;
republicanismo;
Constitucionalismo popular;
republicanisms;
deliberation;
institutional design;
Popular constitutionalism;
political equality.
topic_facet equidad política
deliberación;
diseño institucional;
republicanismo;
Constitucionalismo popular;
republicanisms;
deliberation;
institutional design;
Popular constitutionalism;
political equality.
citationissue 48
citationedition Núm. 48 , Año 2021 : Enero-Abril
publisher Departamento de Derecho Constitucional
ispartofjournal Revista Derecho del Estado
source https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/6960
language Español
format Article
rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Donald Bello Hutt - 2020
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
references Oliver-Lalana, Daniel. ¿Le importa a alguien que los legisladores razonen? Sobre el análisis y el control del debate parlamentario de las leyes. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa 57 (2), 2016: 5-37.
Mansbridge, Jane et al. The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1), 2010: 64-100.
Marcilla, Gema. Balancing as a Guide to Legislative Reasoning. Legisprudence 4 (1), 2010: 93-104.
Marmor, Andrei. The Language of Law. oup, Oxford, 2014.
Martí, José Luis. La república deliberativa. Marcial Pons, Madrid, 2006.
McCormick, John. Machiavellian Democracy. cup, Cambridge, 2011.
Miller, David. Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice. Political Studies 40 (1), 1992: 54-67.
Oliver-Lalana, Daniel. Foreword: Towards a Theory of Legislative Argument. Legisprudence 4 (1), 2010: 3-12.
Manin, Bernard. The Principles of Representative Government. cup, Cambridge, 1997.
Ovejero Lucas, Félix. La libertad inhóspita. Modelos humanos y democracia liberal. Paidós, Barcelona, 2002.
Parkinson, John. Deliberating in the Real World. oup, Oxford, 2006.
Pettit, Philip. On the People’s Terms: A reply to five critiques. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (crispp) 18 (6), 2015: 687-696.
Pettit, Philip. On the People’s Terms. A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. cup, Cambridge, 2012.
Pettit, Philip. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1997.
Pintore, Anna. Democrazia e diritti. Sette studi analitici. Edizioni ets, Pisa, 2010.
Mansbridge, Jane et al. A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In John Parkinson & Jane Mansbridge (eds.). Deliberative systems: deliberative democracy at the large scale. Theories of Institutional Design, cup, Cambridge, 2012, 1-26.
Manin, Bernard. On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation. Political Theory 15 (3), 1987: 338-368.
Post, Robert & Reva Siegel. Democratic Constitutionalism. In Jack Balkin & Reva Siegel (eds.). The Constitution in 2020. oup, Oxford, 2009, 25-34.
Hogg , Peter W. & Allison A. Bushell. El Diálogo de la Carta Entre Tribunales y las Legislaturas. Revista Argentina de Teoría Juridica 14 (2), (2013).
Gutmann, Amy & Dennis Thompson. Democracy and Disagreement. The Belknap Press of HUP, Cambridge, Massachusetts & London ,1996.
Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. The mit Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996.
Habermas, Jürgen. Justification and Application. Remarks on Discourse Ethics. The mit Press, Massachussets & London, 1993.
Hanssen, Andrew F. The Political Economy of Judicial Selection: Theory and Evidence. Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy 9 (3), 1999: 413-424.
Hendriks, Carolyn M. Consensus Conferences and Planning Cells. Lay Citizen Deliberations. In John Gastil & Peter Levine (eds.). The Deliberative Democracy Handbook. Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 2005: 80-110
Hiebert L., Janet. Parliamentary Bills of Rights: An Alternative Model?. The Modern Law Review 69 (1), 2006: 7-28.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Hacket Publishing, Indianapolis & Cambridge, 1996.
Madison, James. Who Are the Best Keepers of the People’s Liberties?. In Ralph Ketcham (ed.), Selected Writings of James Madison. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis/Cambridge, 2006, 227-229.
Kant, Immanuel. Toward Perpetual Peace. In Pauline Kleingeld ed.). Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History. yup, New Haven & London 2006, 67-109.
Knowles, Helen J. & Julianne A. Toia. Defining ‘Popular Constitutionalism: The Kramer versus Kramer Problem. Southern University Law Review 42 (1), 2014: 31-59.
Kramer, Larry. “The Interest of the Man”: James Madison, Popular Constitutionalism, and the Theory of Deliberative Democracy.” Valparaiso Law Review 41 (2), 2007: 697-754.
Kramer, Larry. The People Themselves. Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. OUP, Oxford, 2004a.
Larmore, Charles. A Critique of Philip Pettit’s Republicanism. Philosophical Issues, 2001: 229-243.
Lorenzetti, Ricardo. Las Audiencias Públicas y la Corte Suprema. Revista Argentina de Teoría Política 14 (2), 2013.
Lovett, Frank. “Republicanism.” Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 10 11 2014, http://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-in/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=republicanism.
Pitkin, Hanna. The Concept of Representation. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1967.
Pozen, David. Judicial Elections as Popular Constitutionalism. Columbia Law Review 110, 2010 2047-2134.
Gargarella, Roberto. La justicia frente al gobierno. Sobre el carácter contramayoritario del poder judicial. Ariel, Barcelona, 1996.
Waldron, Jeremy. Political Political Theory. hup, Cambridge, Massachusetts: 2016.
Waldron, Jeremy. Representative Lawmaking. Boston University Law Review 89 (2009): 335-355.
Waldron, Jeremy. The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review. The Yale Law Journal, 115 (2006): 1346-1406.
Waldron, Jeremy. The Dignity of Legislation. cup, Cambridge, 1999.
Wintgens, Luc J. Legisprudence as a New Theory of Legislation. Ratio Juris 19 (1), 2006: 1-25.
Zietlow, Rebecca E. Popular Originalism? The Tea Party Movement and Constitutional Theory. Florida Law Review 64 (2), 2012: 483-512.
Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. pup, Princeton, 1999.
Urbinati, Nadia. Representation as Advocacy. Political Theory 28 (6), 2000: 758-786.
Tushnet, Mark. Non-Judicial Review. Harvard Journal on Legislation 40 (2003): 453- 92.
Rehg , William. Translator’s Introduction. In Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, The mit Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996, ix-xliii
Schmidt, Christopher. The Tea Party and the Constitution. 2011. The Tea Party and the Constitution. Available at: http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/fac_schol/546
Rodríguez Garavito, César. El Activismo Dialógico y el Impacto de los Fallos Sobre Derechos Sociales. Revista Argentina de Teoría Jurídica 14 (2), 2013: 211-244.
Ryan, Matthew & Graham Smith. “Defining Mini-publics”. In Kimmo Grönlund, André Bächtiger & Maija Setälä (eds.). Deliberative mini-publics. Involving citizens in the democratic process, ecpr Press, Colchester, 2014, 9-26
Sanders, Lynn. Poll Envy: An Assessment of Deliberative Polling. The Good Society 9, (1), 1999: 9-14.
Schäfer, Andreas. Deliberation in representative institutions: an analytical framework for a systemic approach. Australian Journal of Political Science, 2017: 1-17.
Schk ade, David, Cass R. Sunstein & Reid Hastie. When Deliberation Produces Extremism. Critical Review 2010: 227-252.
Schlink, Bernhard. Proportionality in Constitutional Law: Why everywhere but here. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 22 (2012): 291-302.
Schwartzberg, Melissa. Should Progressive Constitutionalism Embrace Popular Constitutionalism?, Ohio State Law Journal 72 (6), 2011, 1295-1316.
Tschentscher, Axel, André Bächtiger, Jürg Steiner & Marco Steenbergen. Deliberation in Parliaments. Research Objectives and Prelminary Results of the Bern Center for Interdisciplinary Deliberation Studies (bids). Legisprudence 4 (1), 2010: 13-34.
Sebastián, Linares. Justicia dialógica interinstitucional: de lege ferenda y de lege lata. Revista Argentina de Teoría Jurídica 14 (2), 2013.
Sieckmann, Jan. Legislative Argumentation and Democratic Legitimation. Legisprudence 4 (1), 2010: 69-91.
Skinner, Quentin. A Third Concept of Liberty. Proceedings of the British Academy, 2002: 237-268.
Skinner, Quentin. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. cup, Cambridge, 2008.
Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. cup, Cambridge, 1998.
Sunstein, Cass. The Law of Group Polarization. The Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2), 2002: 175-195.
Sydney, Algernon. Discourses Concerning Government. Edited by Thomas G. West, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, 1698.
Gosh, Eric. Deliberative Democracy and the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: Considering Constitutional Juries. ojls 30 (2), 2010: 327-359.
Goodin, Robert E. & John S. Dryzek. Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics. Politics & Society 34 2, 2006: 219-244.
Gargarella, Roberto. El nuevo constitutionalismo dialógico, frente al sistema de pesos y contrapesos. Revista Argentina de Teoría Jurídica 14 (2), 2013: 356-362.
Bächtiger, André, Maija Setäla & Gröndlund. Towards a New Era of Deliberative Mini-Publics. In Grönlund, Kimmo, André Bächtiger & Setälä, Maija (eds.). Deliberative Mini-Publics. Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, ecpr Press, Colchester, 2014: 225-245.
Atria, Fernando. Revisión judicial: el síndrome de la víctima insatisfecha. Estudios Públicos, 2000: 347-402.
Alterio, Ana Micaela & Niembro, Roberto. Constitucionalismo popular en Latinoamérica, México DF: Porrúa, 2013.
Alexy, Robert. On Balancing and Subsumption. A Structural Comparison. Ratio Juris 16: 4, 2003b: 433-449.
Alexy, Robert. Constitutional Rights, Balancing and Rationality. Ratio Juris, 16: 2, 2003a: 131-140.
Ackerman, Bruce y James S. Fishk in. Deliberation Day, yup, New Haven & London, 2004.
Gardbaum, Stephen. The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism. Theory and Practice. cup, Cambridge, 2013.
Beatty, David M. The Ultimate Rule of Law. OUP, Oxford, 2005.
Barak, Aharon. Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations, cup, Cambridge, 2012.
Beaumont, Elizabeth. The Civic Constitution: Civic Visions and Struggles in the Path Toward Constitutional Democracy, OUP, Oxford, 2014.
Gardbaum, Stephen. Reassessing the new Commonwealth model of constitutionalism. Icon 8, 2010: 167-206.
Fishk in, James S. The Voice of the People. Public Opinion and Democracy. YUP, New Haven, 1997.
Fishk in, James S. & Robert C. Luskin. The Quest for Deliberative Democracy. In Michael Saward (ed.). Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Representation and Association Routledge, London, 2000, 17-28.
Bellamy, Richard. Political Constitutionalism. A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy, cup, Cambridge, 2007.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., Fay Lomax Cook & R. Lawrence Jakobs . Public Deliberations, Discursive Participation and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Annual Review of Political Science 7 (1), 2004: 315-344.
Dahl, Robert. Democracy and its Critics. yup, New Haven & London, 1989.
Couso, Javier A. The Politics of Judicial Review in Chile in the Era of Domestic Transition, 1990-2002. In Siri Gloppen, Roberto Gargarella & Elin Skaar (eds.). Democratization and the Judiciary. The Accoountability Function of Courts in New Democracies, Frank Cass, New York, 2005, 70-91.
Cohen, Joshua. Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In James Bohman & William Rehg (eds.). Deliberative Democracy, The mit Press, Cambridge, Massachusets & London.1998, 67-92.
Chambers, Simone. Deliberative Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 6, 2003: 307-326.
Fishk in, James & Cynthia Farrar. Deliberative Polling. From Experiment to Community Resource. In John Gastil & Peter Levine (eds.). The Deliberative Democracy Handbook.
Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century, Jossey - Bass, San Francisco, 2005, 68-79.
Chambers, Simone. Deliberation and Mass Democracy. In John Parkinson & Jane Mansbridge (eds.), Deliberative Systems. Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, cup, Cambridge, 2012: 53-71.
Friedman, Barry. Mediated Popular Constitutionalism. Michigan Law Review 101 (8), 2003: 2596-2636.
Donnelly, Tom. Making Popular Constitutionalism Work. Wisconsin Law Review 2012: 159-194.
Calvert, Aubin & Mark E. Warren. Deliberative Democracy and Framing Effects: Why Frames are a Problem and How Deiberative MIni-Publics MIight Overcome Them. In Grönlund, Kimmo, André Bächtiger & Setälä, Maija (eds.). Deliberative Mini-Publics. Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, ecpr Press, Colchester, 2014: 203-223.
Button, Mark & David Michael Ryfe. What can we Learn from the Practice of Deliberative Democracy?. In John Gastil & Petter Levine (eds.). The Deliberative Democracy Handbook. Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco: 2005: 20-33.
Boswell, John, Carolyn M. Hendriks & Selen A. Ercan. Message received? Examining transmission in Deliberative Systems. Critical Policy Studies 10 (3), 2016: 263-283.
Fung, Archon. Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences. The Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (3), 203: 338-367.
Bonneau, Chris W. & Gann Hall, Melinda. In Defense of Judicial Elections. Routledge, New York, 2009.
Bohman, James. Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (4) (1998): 400-425.
Bohman, James. Representation in the deliberative system. In John Parkinson and Jane Mansbridge (eds.), Deliberative Systems. Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, cup, Cambridge, 2012: 72-94.
Bohman, James. Public Deliberation. Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. The mit Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, 1996.
Bohman, James. Epistemic Value and Deliberative Democracy. The Good Society 18 (2) (2009): 28-34.
Bello, Donald E. Republicanism, Deliberative Democracy, and Equality of Access and Deliberation, Theoria (Wiley) 84 (1), 2018: 83-111.
Bello, Donald E. Deliberation and Courts: The Role of the Judiciary in a Deliberative System, Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 152 (64), 2017b: 77-103
Bello, Donald E. Against Judicial Supremacy in Constitutional Interpretation 31 (2017a): 7-28.
Elster, Jon. Introduction. In Jon Elster, (ed.) Deliberative Democracy. CUP, Cambridge, 1998, 1-18.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2020-12-07
date_accessioned 2020-12-07T14:09:25Z
date_available 2020-12-07T14:09:25Z
url https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/6960
url_doi https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n48.07
issn 0122-9893
eissn 2346-2051
doi 10.18601/01229893.n48.07
citationstartpage 183
citationendpage 214
url3_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/6960/9864
url4_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/6960/9795
url2_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/6960/9525
_version_ 1797158182021234688

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares