Reformas (in)constitucionales basadas en acuerdos de paz

Reformas (in)constitucionales basadas en acuerdos de paz

Los acuerdos de paz que buscan poner fin a conflictos armados internos suelen estar precedidos de modificaciones constitucionales radicales. Más de 100 acuerdos de paz concluidos desde 1989 contienen disposiciones relacionadas con la reforma constitucional. Cuando tales reformas constitucionales están concebidas dentro del marco de una Constitución existente, a diferencia de lo que ocurre en el caso de la creación de una nueva Constitución, los acuerdos alcanzados con tanto esfuerzo entre las partes firmantes están expuestos al “desafío de inconstitucionalidad”. Aunque existe abundante literatura sobre la elaboración de una nueva Constitución durante las transiciones del conflicto a la paz, la implementación de un acuerdo de paz dentro de u... Ver más

Guardado en:

Revista Derecho del Estado

0122-9893

2346-2051

Olcay, Tarik

Ozcelik, Asli

UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA

10.18601/01229893.n53.01

2022-08-24

5

53

Colombia

ponderación de la paz,

legalismo

supraconstitucionalidad,

control judicial,

derecho internacional,

justicia transicional,

cambios constitucionales basados en acuerdos de paz,

desafío de inconstitucionalidad de la paz,

Constitución,

reforma constitucional,

conflictos armados,

cambio constitucional,

Acuerdos de paz,

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

Asli Ozcelik, Tarik Olcay - 2022

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

id d18d8ff049b4dcf66e931368a8bc38c3
record_format ojs
spelling Reformas (in)constitucionales basadas en acuerdos de paz
Kenya National Dialogue and Reconciliation: Longer Term Issues and Solutions – Constitutional Review. Mar. 4, 2008. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/kenyaconstitutionalreview2008
Garlicki, L. y Garlicka, Z. External Review of Constitutional Amendments? International Law as a Norm of Reference. En Isr. L. Rev. 44, 343, 2009, 357-367.
General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bosnia and Herzegovina – Croatia – Yugoslavia. Nov. 21, 1995. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/bosniadaytonagreement95
Halmai, G. Transitional Justice, Transitional Constitutionalism and Constitutional Culture. En Jacobsohn, G. y Schor, M. (eds.), Comparative Constitutional Theory, 2018.
Hay, E. International(ized) Constitutions and Peacebuilding. En Leiden J. Int’l L. 27, 141, 145, 2014.
Heffes, E. y Kotlik, M. Special Agreements as a Means of Enhancing Compliance with IHL in Non-International Armed Conflicts: An Inquiry into the Governing Legal Regime. En Int’l Rev. Red Cross. 96, 1195, 2014.
Jackson, V. What’s in a Name? Reflections on Timing, Naming and Constitution- Making. En Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 49, 1249, 2008.
Kelsen, H. Who Ought to be the Guardian of the Constitution? Kelsen’s Reply to Schmitt. En Vinx, L. (ed.), The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law. 2015, 174-221.
Klein, C. y Sajó, A. Constitution-Making: Process and Substance. En Rosenfeld, M. y Sajó, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, 2013.
Framework Agreement (Ohrid Agreement), Republic of Macedonia – Ethnic Albanian Representatives. Aug. 13, 2001. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/fyromohridagreement2001
Kumm, M. Constituent Power, Cosmopolitan Constitutionalism, and Post-Positivist Law. En Int’l J. Const. L. 14, 697, 2016.
Lagarde, M. Clearing the Pathways to Peace: Law, Policy, and the Mindanao Conflict. En Ateneo L.J. 59, 1141, 1200, 2015.
Landau, D. Constitution-Making Gone Wrong. En Ala. L. Rev. 64, 923, 2013.
Ley n.º 2017-31/an-rm del 2 de junio de 2017, “portant révision de la Constitution du 25 février 1992”.
Loizides, N. Negotiated Settlements and Peace Referendums. En Eur. J. Pol. Res. 53, 240, 2014.
Loughlin, M. The Concept of Constituent Power. En Eur. J. Pol. Theory. 13, 218, 2014.
Ludsin, H. Peacemaking and Constitution-Drafting: A Dysfunctional Marriage. En U. Pa. J. Int’l L. 33, 239, 242, 2011.
Framework for a Comprehensive Political Settlement of the Cambodia Conflict. Oct. 23, 1991. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/cambodiaparisagreement91
Final Agreement for the Settlement of the Differences as Described in the United Nations Security Council Resolution 817 (1993) and 845 (1993), The Termination of the Interim Accord of 1995, and the Establishment of a Strategic Partnership between the Parties, Greece – fyrom, art. 4(d), June 12, 2018. Disponible en: https://www.un.org/pga/73/wp-content/uploads/sites/53/2019/02/14-February-Letter-dated-14-February-2019.pdf
Miller R v. Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, 2017, U.K.S.C. 5.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Burundi. Decision rccb 303, May 4, 2015. Disponible en: https://www.ihrda.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Judgment-of-Burundi-Constitutional-Court-englishtranslation.pdf
Choudhry, S. Civil War, Ceasefire, Constitution: Some Preliminary Notes. En Cardozo L. Rev. 33, 1907, 1917, 2012.
Ciencia Jr., A. N. From Judicialization to Politicization of the Judiciary: The Philippine Case. En Dressel, B. (ed.), The Judicialization of Politics in Asia. 2012.
Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro, Government of the Philippines (gph) – Moro Islamic Liberation Front (milf). Mar. 27, 2014. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/philippines-comprehensiveagreement2014
Comprehensive Peace Agreement between the Government of Nepal and the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist). Nov. 21, 2006. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/nepal-comprehensiveagreement2006
Constitución de la República de Filipinas, 1987.
Constitución de la República de Rwanda, 2003.
Constitución de Malí, 1992.
Corte Constitucional (Colombia). Sentencia C-225 de 1995. Disponible en: http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1995/C-225-95.htm
Eberhard, H., Lachmayer, K. y Thallinger, G. Approaching Transitional Constitutionalism. En Eberhard, H., Lachmayer. K. y Gerhard Thallinger. G. (eds.), Transitional Constitutionalism, 2007.
Corte Constitucional (Colombia). Sentencia C-332 de 2017. Disponible en: http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2017/C-332-17.htm
Corte Constitucional (Colombia). Sentencia C-630 de 2017. Disponible en: http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2017/C-630-17.htm
Corte Constitucional (Malí). Arrêt No. 2017-04/ccm/Réf. du 4 juillet 2017. Disponible en: http://www.courconstitutionnelle.ml/wpcontent/uploads/2019/02/Recueil_Volume-6_2014-2017-1.pdf
Daly, T. The Judiciary and Constitutional Transitions. Workshop Report, 14-15 November 2014. La Haya: International Idea. Disponible en: https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/the-judiciary-andconstitutional-transitions.pdf.
Dann, P. y Al-Ali, Z. The Internationalized Pouvoir Constituant – Constitution-Making under External Influence in Iraq, Sudan and East Timor. En Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online. 10, 423, 2006.
Diawara, S. M. Mali: Peace Process, Constitutional Reform, and an Uncertain Political Future. En ConstitutionNet. July 20, 2017. Disponible en: http://constitutionnet.org/news/mali-peace-process-constitutional-reformand
Easterday, J. S. Peace Agreements as a Framework for Jus Post Bellum. En Stahn, C., Easterday, J. S. e Iverson, J. (eds.), Jus Post Bellum, 2014.
Memorandum of Agreement on the Ancestral Domain Aspect of the grp-milf Tripoli Agreement on Peace of 2001, Governance. Aug. 5, 2008. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/philippines-memorandum-ancestraldomains2008
¡Nada de cambios en la Constitución de Ucrania en estado de guerra! En hyvlya. 13 de agosto de 2015. Disponible en: https://hvylya.net/analytics/politics/ni-zminam-dokonstitutsiyi-ukrayini-v-umovah-voyennogo-stanu.html
Cepeda Espinosa, M. J. y Landau, D. Colombian Constitutional Law: Leading Cases. 2017.
Yap, P. The Conundrum of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments. En Glob. Const. 4, 114, 135, 2015.
Thornhill, C. Rights and Constituent Power in the Global Constitution. En Int’l J. L. Context. 10, 357, 2014.
Tupaz, A. E. C. F. The Mindanao Question: Constitutional Dialogue in Southern Philippines. En Ateneo L.J. 54, 1, 55-58, 2009.
Turner, C. Transitional Constitutionalism and the Case of the Arab Spring. En Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 64, 267, 271-274, 2015.
uncertain-political-future
United Nations and University of Cambridge, Language of Peace. Disponible en: https://www.languageofpeace.org
Vierucci, L. The Colombian Peace Agreement of 24 November 2016 and International Law: Some Preliminary Remarks, Peace Processes and Human Dignity. 2016. Disponible en: https://www.peaceprocesses.it/images/pdf/luisa_vierucci_-_agreement_colombia-farc.pdf
Villamizar Chaparro, M. Rushing Peace: The Fast-Track in Colombia. En The Journal of Int’l Policy Solutions. Nov. 15, 2017. Disponible en: https://www.jipsblog.com/single-post/2017/11/15/Rushing-Peace-The-Fast-Track-in-Colombia
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Suteu, S. Eternity Clauses in Post-Conflict and Post-Authoritarian Constitution-Making: Promise and Limits. En Glob. Const. 6, 63, 85, 2017.
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Teitel, R. Transitional Justice. 2001.
Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2009-vi Eur. Ct. H.R. 273.
Neuman, G. Human Rights and Constitutional Rights: Harmony and Dissonance. En Stan. L. Rev. 55, 1863, 2003, 1875-1876.
Protocol on the Results of Consultations of the Trilateral Contact Group (Minsk Agreement), Sept. 5, 2014. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/UA-ceasefire-2014
Northern Ireland Peace Agreement. Apr. 10, 1998. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/uk-ireland-good-friday98
Ozcelik, A. Entrenching Peace in Law: Do Peace Agreements Possess International Legal Status? En Melb. J. Int’l L. 21, 2020, en proceso de edición.
Package of Measures for the Implementation of the Minsk Agreements, Ukraine-Russia. Feb. 12, 2015. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/ukraine-minsk-implementation15
Peace Agreement between the Government of Sierra Leone and the Revolutionary United Front (ruf). July 7, 1999. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/sierraleone-lomeagreement99
Peace Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Rwanda and the Rwandese Patriotic Front. Aug. 4, 1993. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/rwandapeaceagreementrpf93.
Philippine Constitution Association (philconsa) v. Philippine Government (gph), Petition, G.R. No. 24324, Dec. 11, 2018.
Prosecutor v. Morris Kallon and Brima Buzzy Kamara, Decision on Challenge to Jurisdiction: Lomé Accord Amnesty, scsl-2004-15-AR72(E) and scsl-2004-16-AR72(E), Appeals Chamber, Mar. 13, Sierra Leone, 2014.
Provincia del Norte de Cotabato contra Panel de Paz sobre el Patrimonio Ancestral del Gobierno de la República de Filipinas (grp), 568 S.C.R.A. 402, 2008.
Secretaría General de las Naciones Unidas. Nota de Orientación de la Secretaría General sobre la Asistencia de las Naciones Unidas en procesos de elaboración de constituciones. 2009. Disponible en: https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/Guidance_Note_United_Nations_Assistance_to_Constitutionmaking_Processes_final.pdf
Ramírez Cleves, G. A. The Colombian Constitutional Court Rules that the Peace Agreement Is Mandatory for Three Presidential Terms. En Int’l J. Const. L. Blog. 27 de octubre de 2017. Disponible en: http://www.iconnectblog.com/2017/10/thecolombian-constitutional-court-rules-that-thepeace-agreement-is-mandatory-forthree-presidential-terms/
Ríos Figueroa, J. Constitutional Courts as Mediators: Armed Conflict, Civil-Military Relations, and the Rule of Law in Latin America, 2016.
Robinson v. Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, 2002, U.K.H.L. 32.
Roznai, Y. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers. 2017.
Sapiano, J. Courting Peace: Judicial Review and Peace Jurisprudence. En Glob. Const. 6, 131, 2017.
Saunders, C. Constitutional Review in Peace Processes Securing Local Ownership. En Accord. 25, 2014.
Saunders, C. International Involvement in Constitution Making. University of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper, 20. July 4, 2019. Disponible en: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3414698
Schnably, S. Emerging International Law Constraints on Constitutional Structure and Revision: A Preliminary Appraisal. En U. Miami L. Rev. 62, 417, 2008.
Chittagong Hill Tracts Accord, Bangladesh-Parbatya Chattagram Jana Sanghati Samity. Dec. 2, 1997. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/node/1449.
Chang, W. Back into the Political? Rethinking Judicial, Legal, and Transnational Constitutionalism. En Int’l J. Const. L. 17, 453, 458-459, 2019.
Carrizosa, M. Peace-ing Colombia Together. Public Seminar, Nov. 21, 2016. Disponible en: http://www.publicseminar.org/2016/11/peace-ing-colombia-together/
ponderación de la paz,
Español
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/8156
Revista Derecho del Estado
Departamento de Derecho Constitucional
text/xml
text/html
Artículo de revista
Núm. 53 , Año 2022 : Septiembre-Diciembre
53
legalismo
supraconstitucionalidad,
control judicial,
Asli Ozcelik, Tarik Olcay - 2022
derecho internacional,
justicia transicional,
cambios constitucionales basados en acuerdos de paz,
desafío de inconstitucionalidad de la paz,
Constitución,
reforma constitucional,
conflictos armados,
cambio constitucional,
Acuerdos de paz,
Olcay, Tarik
Ozcelik, Asli
Los acuerdos de paz que buscan poner fin a conflictos armados internos suelen estar precedidos de modificaciones constitucionales radicales. Más de 100 acuerdos de paz concluidos desde 1989 contienen disposiciones relacionadas con la reforma constitucional. Cuando tales reformas constitucionales están concebidas dentro del marco de una Constitución existente, a diferencia de lo que ocurre en el caso de la creación de una nueva Constitución, los acuerdos alcanzados con tanto esfuerzo entre las partes firmantes están expuestos al “desafío de inconstitucionalidad”. Aunque existe abundante literatura sobre la elaboración de una nueva Constitución durante las transiciones del conflicto a la paz, la implementación de un acuerdo de paz dentro de un marco constitucional existente y el “desafío de inconstitucionalidad” de las reformas para la paz no han sido examinados en su totalidad hasta la fecha. En este artículo identificamos primero las modalidades en las cuales el “desafío de inconstitucionalidad” se dirige a un cambio constitucional originado en acuerdos de paz. El análisis lo realizamos a través de un estudio comparado y con especial referencia a los procesos de paz en Colombia (con las FARC-EP) y en Filipinas (conflicto Mindanao). Luego, examinamos las promesas y las limitaciones de tres estrategias jurídicas para abordar el desafío de inconstitucionalidad, a saber: (i) acudir al derecho internacional en el examen de inconstitucionalidad, (ii) adoptar el transicionalismo en el control judicial y (iii) atribuir un estatus jurídico supraconstitucional o internacional a los acuerdos de paz. Concluimos que mientras cada estrategia tiene algún mérito, su efectividad puede verse limitada cuando carecen de viabilidad jurídica o política. La resultante insolubilidad del desafío de inconstitucionalidad, particularmente en jurisdicciones donde existe un fuerte compromiso con el legalismo, justifica un replanteamiento del vínculo entre la construcción de la paz y la reforma constitucional, y señala la importancia de tomar en serio los marcos constitucionales existentes en los países en transición.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
application/pdf
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Bernas, J. Constitutional Structure and Powers of Government. Notes and Cases: Part I. 2005.
Arusha Peace and Reconciliation Agreement for Burundi. Aug. 28, 2000. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/node/1207
Asociación Constitucional de Filipinas (philconsa) v. Gobierno de Filipinas (gph), G.R. No. 218406, 29 de noviembre, 2016.
Bell, C. Peace Agreements: Their Nature and Legal Status. En Am. J. Int’l L. 100, 373, 2006, 391-394.
Bell, C. y Zulueta-Fülscher, K. Sequencing Peace Agreements and Constitutions in the Political Settlement Process. Policy Paper, 32. La Haya: International Idea, 2016. Disponible en: https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/sequencing-peaceagreements-and-constitutionspoliticalsettlement process.
Bell, C., O’Rourke, C. y Matzner, S. A Chronology of Colombian Peace Processes and Peace Agreements. Political Settlements Research Programme, 2015. Disponible en: http://www.politicalsettlements.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/01/2015_BP_1_Bell_ORourke_Matzner_PA-XColumbian-Chronology-2.pdf
Benvenisti, E. Judicial Misgivings Regarding the Application of International Law: An Analysis of Attitudes of National Courts. En Eur. J. Int’l L. 4, 159, 1993.
Betancur Restrepo, L. The Legal Status of the Colombian Peace Agreement. En ajil Unbound. 110, 188, 188, 2016.
Albert, R. Temporal Limitations in Constitutional Amendment, 21 rev. const. stud. 37, 41-42, 2016.
Bjorge, E. Can Unincorporated Treaty Obligations Be Part of English Law? En Pub. L. 2017, 571-591.
Bougainville Peace Agreement (Papua New Guinea). Aug. 30, 2001. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/png-bougainville-agreement2001
Brahimi, L. State Building in Crisis and Post-Conflict Countries. En 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government: Building Trust in Government, 2007. Disponible en: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan026305.pdf
Cajas-Sarria, M. Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments in Colombia: A Political and Historical Perspective, 1955-2016. En The Theory and Practice of Legislation. 5, 245, 2017.
Candelaria, S. M. y Singzon, M. E. I. S. Testing Constitutional Waters II: Political and Social Legitimacy of Judicial Decisions. En Ateneo L.J. 55, 1, 2010, 38-46.
Candelaria, S. M. y Lee, S. M. A.The Proposed Bangsamoro Basic Law and the Primacy of the Sovereign Power of the State. En Ateneo L.J. 62, 183, 2018.
Candelaria, S. M. y Nonato, R. An Overview of the International Legal Concept of Peace Agreements as Applied to Current Philippine Peace Processes. En Ateneo L.J. 53, 263, 277, 2008.
Arato, A. Constitution Making under Occupation: The Politics of Imposed Revolution in Iraq. Nueva York: Columbia University Press, 2009.
Bernal Pulido, C. Transitional Justice within the Framework of a Permanent Constitution: The Case Study of The Legal Framework for Peace in Colombia. En Cambridge J. Int’l & Comp. L. 3, 1136, 1139, 2014.
Albert, R. Nakashidze, M. y Olcay, T. The Formalist Resistance to Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments. En Hastings L.J. 70, 639, 2019.
Agreement on Provisional Arrangements in Afghanistan Pending the Re-establishment of Permanent Government Institutions (Bonn Agreement), Nov. 14, 2001. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/afghanistanbonnagreement2001.
Accord pour la Paix et la Reconciliation au Mali – Issu du Processus d’Alger, sec. 1, ch. 1, art. 3, June 20, 2015. Disponible en: https://www.peaceagreements.org/masterdocument/1365
Acto Legislativo 1 de 2016, Diario Oficial n.º 49.927 de 7 de julio de 2016 (Colom.).
Acto Legislativo 1 de 2017, Diario Oficial n.º 50.196 de 7 de abril de 2017 (Colom.).
Acuerdo Final para la Terminación del Conflicto Armado y la Construcción de una Paz Estable y Duradera, Colombia – farc-ep, 24 de noviembre de 2016. Disponible en: http://especiales.presidencia.gov.co/Documents/20170620-dejacionarmas/acuerdos/acuerdofinal-ingles.pdf
Publication
Agreement on the Implementation Mechanism for the Transition Process in Yemen in Accordance with the Initiative of the Gulf Cooperation Council, National Coalition- National Council, pt. I, 4, Dec. 5, 2011. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/yemen-transition-mechanism2011
judicial review,
Peace agreements aiming to end intra-state armed conflicts have often provided for radical constitutional change, with more than 100 peace agreements concluded since 1989 containing provisions on constitutional reform. When such constitutional change is envisaged to take place within the framework of an existing constitution, as opposed to the making of a new constitution, hard-achieved deals between peace-making parties are exposed to ‘the unconstitutionality challenge’. Although there is ample literature on the making of a new constitution during transitions from conflict to peace, implementing a peace agreement within an existing constitutional framework and ‘the unconstitutionality challenge’ to peace reforms have not been fully examined to date. In this Article, we first identify the modalities in which ‘the unconstitutionality challenge’ is directed at constitutional change rooted in peace agreements. We do so through a comparative survey and by reference to peace processes in Colombia (with the farc-ep) and the Philippines (regarding the Mindanao conflict). We then examine the promise and limitations of three legal strategies in addressing the unconstitutionality challenge: (i) recourse to international law in assessing unconstitutionality, (ii) transitionalism in judicial review, and (iii) attributing supraconstitutional or international legal status to peace agreements. We conclude that while each strategy has some merit, their effectiveness may be limited where they lack legal feasibility or political purchase. The resulting intractability of the unconstitutionality challenge, particularly in jurisdictions where there is a strong commitment to legalism, warrants a rethinking of the link between peace-making and constitutional reform and the importance of taking existing constitutional frameworks in transitional countries seriously.
Peace agreements,
constitutional change,
constitutional reform,
armed conflicts,
new constitution,
the unconstitutionality challenge to peace,
transitional justice,
constitutional change rooted in peace agreements,
Journal article
weighing of peace,
(Un)constitutional Change Rooted in Peace Agreements
international law,
legalism
supraconstitutional,
10.18601/01229893.n53.01
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8156/13468
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8156/13469
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8156/13470
5
2346-2051
0122-9893
2022-08-24
https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n53.01
2022-08-24T12:41:29Z
53
2022-08-24T12:41:29Z
institution UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista Derecho del Estado
title Reformas (in)constitucionales basadas en acuerdos de paz
spellingShingle Reformas (in)constitucionales basadas en acuerdos de paz
Olcay, Tarik
Ozcelik, Asli
ponderación de la paz,
legalismo
supraconstitucionalidad,
control judicial,
derecho internacional,
justicia transicional,
cambios constitucionales basados en acuerdos de paz,
desafío de inconstitucionalidad de la paz,
Constitución,
reforma constitucional,
conflictos armados,
cambio constitucional,
Acuerdos de paz,
judicial review,
Peace agreements,
constitutional change,
constitutional reform,
armed conflicts,
new constitution,
the unconstitutionality challenge to peace,
transitional justice,
constitutional change rooted in peace agreements,
weighing of peace,
international law,
legalism
supraconstitutional,
title_short Reformas (in)constitucionales basadas en acuerdos de paz
title_full Reformas (in)constitucionales basadas en acuerdos de paz
title_fullStr Reformas (in)constitucionales basadas en acuerdos de paz
title_full_unstemmed Reformas (in)constitucionales basadas en acuerdos de paz
title_sort reformas (in)constitucionales basadas en acuerdos de paz
title_eng (Un)constitutional Change Rooted in Peace Agreements
description Los acuerdos de paz que buscan poner fin a conflictos armados internos suelen estar precedidos de modificaciones constitucionales radicales. Más de 100 acuerdos de paz concluidos desde 1989 contienen disposiciones relacionadas con la reforma constitucional. Cuando tales reformas constitucionales están concebidas dentro del marco de una Constitución existente, a diferencia de lo que ocurre en el caso de la creación de una nueva Constitución, los acuerdos alcanzados con tanto esfuerzo entre las partes firmantes están expuestos al “desafío de inconstitucionalidad”. Aunque existe abundante literatura sobre la elaboración de una nueva Constitución durante las transiciones del conflicto a la paz, la implementación de un acuerdo de paz dentro de un marco constitucional existente y el “desafío de inconstitucionalidad” de las reformas para la paz no han sido examinados en su totalidad hasta la fecha. En este artículo identificamos primero las modalidades en las cuales el “desafío de inconstitucionalidad” se dirige a un cambio constitucional originado en acuerdos de paz. El análisis lo realizamos a través de un estudio comparado y con especial referencia a los procesos de paz en Colombia (con las FARC-EP) y en Filipinas (conflicto Mindanao). Luego, examinamos las promesas y las limitaciones de tres estrategias jurídicas para abordar el desafío de inconstitucionalidad, a saber: (i) acudir al derecho internacional en el examen de inconstitucionalidad, (ii) adoptar el transicionalismo en el control judicial y (iii) atribuir un estatus jurídico supraconstitucional o internacional a los acuerdos de paz. Concluimos que mientras cada estrategia tiene algún mérito, su efectividad puede verse limitada cuando carecen de viabilidad jurídica o política. La resultante insolubilidad del desafío de inconstitucionalidad, particularmente en jurisdicciones donde existe un fuerte compromiso con el legalismo, justifica un replanteamiento del vínculo entre la construcción de la paz y la reforma constitucional, y señala la importancia de tomar en serio los marcos constitucionales existentes en los países en transición.
description_eng Peace agreements aiming to end intra-state armed conflicts have often provided for radical constitutional change, with more than 100 peace agreements concluded since 1989 containing provisions on constitutional reform. When such constitutional change is envisaged to take place within the framework of an existing constitution, as opposed to the making of a new constitution, hard-achieved deals between peace-making parties are exposed to ‘the unconstitutionality challenge’. Although there is ample literature on the making of a new constitution during transitions from conflict to peace, implementing a peace agreement within an existing constitutional framework and ‘the unconstitutionality challenge’ to peace reforms have not been fully examined to date. In this Article, we first identify the modalities in which ‘the unconstitutionality challenge’ is directed at constitutional change rooted in peace agreements. We do so through a comparative survey and by reference to peace processes in Colombia (with the farc-ep) and the Philippines (regarding the Mindanao conflict). We then examine the promise and limitations of three legal strategies in addressing the unconstitutionality challenge: (i) recourse to international law in assessing unconstitutionality, (ii) transitionalism in judicial review, and (iii) attributing supraconstitutional or international legal status to peace agreements. We conclude that while each strategy has some merit, their effectiveness may be limited where they lack legal feasibility or political purchase. The resulting intractability of the unconstitutionality challenge, particularly in jurisdictions where there is a strong commitment to legalism, warrants a rethinking of the link between peace-making and constitutional reform and the importance of taking existing constitutional frameworks in transitional countries seriously.
author Olcay, Tarik
Ozcelik, Asli
author_facet Olcay, Tarik
Ozcelik, Asli
topicspa_str_mv ponderación de la paz,
legalismo
supraconstitucionalidad,
control judicial,
derecho internacional,
justicia transicional,
cambios constitucionales basados en acuerdos de paz,
desafío de inconstitucionalidad de la paz,
Constitución,
reforma constitucional,
conflictos armados,
cambio constitucional,
Acuerdos de paz,
topic ponderación de la paz,
legalismo
supraconstitucionalidad,
control judicial,
derecho internacional,
justicia transicional,
cambios constitucionales basados en acuerdos de paz,
desafío de inconstitucionalidad de la paz,
Constitución,
reforma constitucional,
conflictos armados,
cambio constitucional,
Acuerdos de paz,
judicial review,
Peace agreements,
constitutional change,
constitutional reform,
armed conflicts,
new constitution,
the unconstitutionality challenge to peace,
transitional justice,
constitutional change rooted in peace agreements,
weighing of peace,
international law,
legalism
supraconstitutional,
topic_facet ponderación de la paz,
legalismo
supraconstitucionalidad,
control judicial,
derecho internacional,
justicia transicional,
cambios constitucionales basados en acuerdos de paz,
desafío de inconstitucionalidad de la paz,
Constitución,
reforma constitucional,
conflictos armados,
cambio constitucional,
Acuerdos de paz,
judicial review,
Peace agreements,
constitutional change,
constitutional reform,
armed conflicts,
new constitution,
the unconstitutionality challenge to peace,
transitional justice,
constitutional change rooted in peace agreements,
weighing of peace,
international law,
legalism
supraconstitutional,
citationissue 53
citationedition Núm. 53 , Año 2022 : Septiembre-Diciembre
publisher Departamento de Derecho Constitucional
ispartofjournal Revista Derecho del Estado
source https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/8156
language Español
format Article
rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Asli Ozcelik, Tarik Olcay - 2022
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
references Kenya National Dialogue and Reconciliation: Longer Term Issues and Solutions – Constitutional Review. Mar. 4, 2008. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/kenyaconstitutionalreview2008
Garlicki, L. y Garlicka, Z. External Review of Constitutional Amendments? International Law as a Norm of Reference. En Isr. L. Rev. 44, 343, 2009, 357-367.
General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bosnia and Herzegovina – Croatia – Yugoslavia. Nov. 21, 1995. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/bosniadaytonagreement95
Halmai, G. Transitional Justice, Transitional Constitutionalism and Constitutional Culture. En Jacobsohn, G. y Schor, M. (eds.), Comparative Constitutional Theory, 2018.
Hay, E. International(ized) Constitutions and Peacebuilding. En Leiden J. Int’l L. 27, 141, 145, 2014.
Heffes, E. y Kotlik, M. Special Agreements as a Means of Enhancing Compliance with IHL in Non-International Armed Conflicts: An Inquiry into the Governing Legal Regime. En Int’l Rev. Red Cross. 96, 1195, 2014.
Jackson, V. What’s in a Name? Reflections on Timing, Naming and Constitution- Making. En Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 49, 1249, 2008.
Kelsen, H. Who Ought to be the Guardian of the Constitution? Kelsen’s Reply to Schmitt. En Vinx, L. (ed.), The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law. 2015, 174-221.
Klein, C. y Sajó, A. Constitution-Making: Process and Substance. En Rosenfeld, M. y Sajó, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, 2013.
Framework Agreement (Ohrid Agreement), Republic of Macedonia – Ethnic Albanian Representatives. Aug. 13, 2001. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/fyromohridagreement2001
Kumm, M. Constituent Power, Cosmopolitan Constitutionalism, and Post-Positivist Law. En Int’l J. Const. L. 14, 697, 2016.
Lagarde, M. Clearing the Pathways to Peace: Law, Policy, and the Mindanao Conflict. En Ateneo L.J. 59, 1141, 1200, 2015.
Landau, D. Constitution-Making Gone Wrong. En Ala. L. Rev. 64, 923, 2013.
Ley n.º 2017-31/an-rm del 2 de junio de 2017, “portant révision de la Constitution du 25 février 1992”.
Loizides, N. Negotiated Settlements and Peace Referendums. En Eur. J. Pol. Res. 53, 240, 2014.
Loughlin, M. The Concept of Constituent Power. En Eur. J. Pol. Theory. 13, 218, 2014.
Ludsin, H. Peacemaking and Constitution-Drafting: A Dysfunctional Marriage. En U. Pa. J. Int’l L. 33, 239, 242, 2011.
Framework for a Comprehensive Political Settlement of the Cambodia Conflict. Oct. 23, 1991. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/cambodiaparisagreement91
Final Agreement for the Settlement of the Differences as Described in the United Nations Security Council Resolution 817 (1993) and 845 (1993), The Termination of the Interim Accord of 1995, and the Establishment of a Strategic Partnership between the Parties, Greece – fyrom, art. 4(d), June 12, 2018. Disponible en: https://www.un.org/pga/73/wp-content/uploads/sites/53/2019/02/14-February-Letter-dated-14-February-2019.pdf
Miller R v. Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, 2017, U.K.S.C. 5.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Burundi. Decision rccb 303, May 4, 2015. Disponible en: https://www.ihrda.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Judgment-of-Burundi-Constitutional-Court-englishtranslation.pdf
Choudhry, S. Civil War, Ceasefire, Constitution: Some Preliminary Notes. En Cardozo L. Rev. 33, 1907, 1917, 2012.
Ciencia Jr., A. N. From Judicialization to Politicization of the Judiciary: The Philippine Case. En Dressel, B. (ed.), The Judicialization of Politics in Asia. 2012.
Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro, Government of the Philippines (gph) – Moro Islamic Liberation Front (milf). Mar. 27, 2014. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/philippines-comprehensiveagreement2014
Comprehensive Peace Agreement between the Government of Nepal and the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist). Nov. 21, 2006. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/nepal-comprehensiveagreement2006
Constitución de la República de Filipinas, 1987.
Constitución de la República de Rwanda, 2003.
Constitución de Malí, 1992.
Corte Constitucional (Colombia). Sentencia C-225 de 1995. Disponible en: http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1995/C-225-95.htm
Eberhard, H., Lachmayer, K. y Thallinger, G. Approaching Transitional Constitutionalism. En Eberhard, H., Lachmayer. K. y Gerhard Thallinger. G. (eds.), Transitional Constitutionalism, 2007.
Corte Constitucional (Colombia). Sentencia C-332 de 2017. Disponible en: http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2017/C-332-17.htm
Corte Constitucional (Colombia). Sentencia C-630 de 2017. Disponible en: http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2017/C-630-17.htm
Corte Constitucional (Malí). Arrêt No. 2017-04/ccm/Réf. du 4 juillet 2017. Disponible en: http://www.courconstitutionnelle.ml/wpcontent/uploads/2019/02/Recueil_Volume-6_2014-2017-1.pdf
Daly, T. The Judiciary and Constitutional Transitions. Workshop Report, 14-15 November 2014. La Haya: International Idea. Disponible en: https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/the-judiciary-andconstitutional-transitions.pdf.
Dann, P. y Al-Ali, Z. The Internationalized Pouvoir Constituant – Constitution-Making under External Influence in Iraq, Sudan and East Timor. En Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online. 10, 423, 2006.
Diawara, S. M. Mali: Peace Process, Constitutional Reform, and an Uncertain Political Future. En ConstitutionNet. July 20, 2017. Disponible en: http://constitutionnet.org/news/mali-peace-process-constitutional-reformand
Easterday, J. S. Peace Agreements as a Framework for Jus Post Bellum. En Stahn, C., Easterday, J. S. e Iverson, J. (eds.), Jus Post Bellum, 2014.
Memorandum of Agreement on the Ancestral Domain Aspect of the grp-milf Tripoli Agreement on Peace of 2001, Governance. Aug. 5, 2008. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/philippines-memorandum-ancestraldomains2008
¡Nada de cambios en la Constitución de Ucrania en estado de guerra! En hyvlya. 13 de agosto de 2015. Disponible en: https://hvylya.net/analytics/politics/ni-zminam-dokonstitutsiyi-ukrayini-v-umovah-voyennogo-stanu.html
Cepeda Espinosa, M. J. y Landau, D. Colombian Constitutional Law: Leading Cases. 2017.
Yap, P. The Conundrum of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments. En Glob. Const. 4, 114, 135, 2015.
Thornhill, C. Rights and Constituent Power in the Global Constitution. En Int’l J. L. Context. 10, 357, 2014.
Tupaz, A. E. C. F. The Mindanao Question: Constitutional Dialogue in Southern Philippines. En Ateneo L.J. 54, 1, 55-58, 2009.
Turner, C. Transitional Constitutionalism and the Case of the Arab Spring. En Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 64, 267, 271-274, 2015.
uncertain-political-future
United Nations and University of Cambridge, Language of Peace. Disponible en: https://www.languageofpeace.org
Vierucci, L. The Colombian Peace Agreement of 24 November 2016 and International Law: Some Preliminary Remarks, Peace Processes and Human Dignity. 2016. Disponible en: https://www.peaceprocesses.it/images/pdf/luisa_vierucci_-_agreement_colombia-farc.pdf
Villamizar Chaparro, M. Rushing Peace: The Fast-Track in Colombia. En The Journal of Int’l Policy Solutions. Nov. 15, 2017. Disponible en: https://www.jipsblog.com/single-post/2017/11/15/Rushing-Peace-The-Fast-Track-in-Colombia
Suteu, S. Eternity Clauses in Post-Conflict and Post-Authoritarian Constitution-Making: Promise and Limits. En Glob. Const. 6, 63, 85, 2017.
Teitel, R. Transitional Justice. 2001.
Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2009-vi Eur. Ct. H.R. 273.
Neuman, G. Human Rights and Constitutional Rights: Harmony and Dissonance. En Stan. L. Rev. 55, 1863, 2003, 1875-1876.
Protocol on the Results of Consultations of the Trilateral Contact Group (Minsk Agreement), Sept. 5, 2014. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/UA-ceasefire-2014
Northern Ireland Peace Agreement. Apr. 10, 1998. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/uk-ireland-good-friday98
Ozcelik, A. Entrenching Peace in Law: Do Peace Agreements Possess International Legal Status? En Melb. J. Int’l L. 21, 2020, en proceso de edición.
Package of Measures for the Implementation of the Minsk Agreements, Ukraine-Russia. Feb. 12, 2015. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/ukraine-minsk-implementation15
Peace Agreement between the Government of Sierra Leone and the Revolutionary United Front (ruf). July 7, 1999. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/sierraleone-lomeagreement99
Peace Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Rwanda and the Rwandese Patriotic Front. Aug. 4, 1993. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/rwandapeaceagreementrpf93.
Philippine Constitution Association (philconsa) v. Philippine Government (gph), Petition, G.R. No. 24324, Dec. 11, 2018.
Prosecutor v. Morris Kallon and Brima Buzzy Kamara, Decision on Challenge to Jurisdiction: Lomé Accord Amnesty, scsl-2004-15-AR72(E) and scsl-2004-16-AR72(E), Appeals Chamber, Mar. 13, Sierra Leone, 2014.
Provincia del Norte de Cotabato contra Panel de Paz sobre el Patrimonio Ancestral del Gobierno de la República de Filipinas (grp), 568 S.C.R.A. 402, 2008.
Secretaría General de las Naciones Unidas. Nota de Orientación de la Secretaría General sobre la Asistencia de las Naciones Unidas en procesos de elaboración de constituciones. 2009. Disponible en: https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/Guidance_Note_United_Nations_Assistance_to_Constitutionmaking_Processes_final.pdf
Ramírez Cleves, G. A. The Colombian Constitutional Court Rules that the Peace Agreement Is Mandatory for Three Presidential Terms. En Int’l J. Const. L. Blog. 27 de octubre de 2017. Disponible en: http://www.iconnectblog.com/2017/10/thecolombian-constitutional-court-rules-that-thepeace-agreement-is-mandatory-forthree-presidential-terms/
Ríos Figueroa, J. Constitutional Courts as Mediators: Armed Conflict, Civil-Military Relations, and the Rule of Law in Latin America, 2016.
Robinson v. Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, 2002, U.K.H.L. 32.
Roznai, Y. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers. 2017.
Sapiano, J. Courting Peace: Judicial Review and Peace Jurisprudence. En Glob. Const. 6, 131, 2017.
Saunders, C. Constitutional Review in Peace Processes Securing Local Ownership. En Accord. 25, 2014.
Saunders, C. International Involvement in Constitution Making. University of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper, 20. July 4, 2019. Disponible en: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3414698
Schnably, S. Emerging International Law Constraints on Constitutional Structure and Revision: A Preliminary Appraisal. En U. Miami L. Rev. 62, 417, 2008.
Chittagong Hill Tracts Accord, Bangladesh-Parbatya Chattagram Jana Sanghati Samity. Dec. 2, 1997. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/node/1449.
Chang, W. Back into the Political? Rethinking Judicial, Legal, and Transnational Constitutionalism. En Int’l J. Const. L. 17, 453, 458-459, 2019.
Carrizosa, M. Peace-ing Colombia Together. Public Seminar, Nov. 21, 2016. Disponible en: http://www.publicseminar.org/2016/11/peace-ing-colombia-together/
Bernas, J. Constitutional Structure and Powers of Government. Notes and Cases: Part I. 2005.
Arusha Peace and Reconciliation Agreement for Burundi. Aug. 28, 2000. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/node/1207
Asociación Constitucional de Filipinas (philconsa) v. Gobierno de Filipinas (gph), G.R. No. 218406, 29 de noviembre, 2016.
Bell, C. Peace Agreements: Their Nature and Legal Status. En Am. J. Int’l L. 100, 373, 2006, 391-394.
Bell, C. y Zulueta-Fülscher, K. Sequencing Peace Agreements and Constitutions in the Political Settlement Process. Policy Paper, 32. La Haya: International Idea, 2016. Disponible en: https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/sequencing-peaceagreements-and-constitutionspoliticalsettlement process.
Bell, C., O’Rourke, C. y Matzner, S. A Chronology of Colombian Peace Processes and Peace Agreements. Political Settlements Research Programme, 2015. Disponible en: http://www.politicalsettlements.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/01/2015_BP_1_Bell_ORourke_Matzner_PA-XColumbian-Chronology-2.pdf
Benvenisti, E. Judicial Misgivings Regarding the Application of International Law: An Analysis of Attitudes of National Courts. En Eur. J. Int’l L. 4, 159, 1993.
Betancur Restrepo, L. The Legal Status of the Colombian Peace Agreement. En ajil Unbound. 110, 188, 188, 2016.
Albert, R. Temporal Limitations in Constitutional Amendment, 21 rev. const. stud. 37, 41-42, 2016.
Bjorge, E. Can Unincorporated Treaty Obligations Be Part of English Law? En Pub. L. 2017, 571-591.
Bougainville Peace Agreement (Papua New Guinea). Aug. 30, 2001. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/png-bougainville-agreement2001
Brahimi, L. State Building in Crisis and Post-Conflict Countries. En 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government: Building Trust in Government, 2007. Disponible en: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan026305.pdf
Cajas-Sarria, M. Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments in Colombia: A Political and Historical Perspective, 1955-2016. En The Theory and Practice of Legislation. 5, 245, 2017.
Candelaria, S. M. y Singzon, M. E. I. S. Testing Constitutional Waters II: Political and Social Legitimacy of Judicial Decisions. En Ateneo L.J. 55, 1, 2010, 38-46.
Candelaria, S. M. y Lee, S. M. A.The Proposed Bangsamoro Basic Law and the Primacy of the Sovereign Power of the State. En Ateneo L.J. 62, 183, 2018.
Candelaria, S. M. y Nonato, R. An Overview of the International Legal Concept of Peace Agreements as Applied to Current Philippine Peace Processes. En Ateneo L.J. 53, 263, 277, 2008.
Arato, A. Constitution Making under Occupation: The Politics of Imposed Revolution in Iraq. Nueva York: Columbia University Press, 2009.
Bernal Pulido, C. Transitional Justice within the Framework of a Permanent Constitution: The Case Study of The Legal Framework for Peace in Colombia. En Cambridge J. Int’l & Comp. L. 3, 1136, 1139, 2014.
Albert, R. Nakashidze, M. y Olcay, T. The Formalist Resistance to Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments. En Hastings L.J. 70, 639, 2019.
Agreement on Provisional Arrangements in Afghanistan Pending the Re-establishment of Permanent Government Institutions (Bonn Agreement), Nov. 14, 2001. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/afghanistanbonnagreement2001.
Accord pour la Paix et la Reconciliation au Mali – Issu du Processus d’Alger, sec. 1, ch. 1, art. 3, June 20, 2015. Disponible en: https://www.peaceagreements.org/masterdocument/1365
Acto Legislativo 1 de 2016, Diario Oficial n.º 49.927 de 7 de julio de 2016 (Colom.).
Acto Legislativo 1 de 2017, Diario Oficial n.º 50.196 de 7 de abril de 2017 (Colom.).
Acuerdo Final para la Terminación del Conflicto Armado y la Construcción de una Paz Estable y Duradera, Colombia – farc-ep, 24 de noviembre de 2016. Disponible en: http://especiales.presidencia.gov.co/Documents/20170620-dejacionarmas/acuerdos/acuerdofinal-ingles.pdf
Agreement on the Implementation Mechanism for the Transition Process in Yemen in Accordance with the Initiative of the Gulf Cooperation Council, National Coalition- National Council, pt. I, 4, Dec. 5, 2011. Disponible en: https://peacemaker.un.org/yemen-transition-mechanism2011
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2022-08-24
date_accessioned 2022-08-24T12:41:29Z
date_available 2022-08-24T12:41:29Z
url https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/8156
url_doi https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n53.01
issn 0122-9893
eissn 2346-2051
doi 10.18601/01229893.n53.01
citationstartpage 5
citationendpage 53
url2_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8156/13468
url3_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8156/13469
url4_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8156/13470
_version_ 1797158276466475008

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares