¿Puede prescindir Dios de la Ceroidad? Deleuze, Peirce y un experimento mental con colores
El propósito de este artículo es explorar la idea de que, aun cuando la Ceroidad fue acuñada por Deleuze y no por Peirce, no hay ningún problema en considerarla como el antecedente formal de la Primeridad. La argumentación mostrará que, sin la Ceroidad, Dios no habría podido transformar la nada en el conjunto vacío y, por tanto, no habría podido crear los elementos de la Primeridad. Esto puede ilustrarse con un experimento mental, en el que se hace evidente que, sin el conjunto vacío, no habrían surgido los continuos de la luminosidad y la coloreidad. Es decir, sin la Ceroidad del conjunto vacío, todo intento de crear los colores habría quedado absorbido en el caos de la nada.
Guardado en:
2256-3202
19
2021-05-31
79
93
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
c6319f0a2188613fe46a9ea508c72ea9 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Revista Guillermo de Ockham |
| title |
¿Puede prescindir Dios de la Ceroidad? Deleuze, Peirce y un experimento mental con colores |
| spellingShingle |
¿Puede prescindir Dios de la Ceroidad? Deleuze, Peirce y un experimento mental con colores Camargo Flórez, Martín Alonso metafísica nada conjunto vacío continuo color semiótica estructura del conocimiento semántica semantics empty set nothing metaphysics continuum structure of knowledge semiotics color |
| title_short |
¿Puede prescindir Dios de la Ceroidad? Deleuze, Peirce y un experimento mental con colores |
| title_full |
¿Puede prescindir Dios de la Ceroidad? Deleuze, Peirce y un experimento mental con colores |
| title_fullStr |
¿Puede prescindir Dios de la Ceroidad? Deleuze, Peirce y un experimento mental con colores |
| title_full_unstemmed |
¿Puede prescindir Dios de la Ceroidad? Deleuze, Peirce y un experimento mental con colores |
| title_sort |
¿puede prescindir dios de la ceroidad? deleuze, peirce y un experimento mental con colores |
| description |
El propósito de este artículo es explorar la idea de que, aun cuando la Ceroidad fue acuñada por Deleuze y no por Peirce, no hay ningún problema en considerarla como el antecedente formal de la Primeridad. La argumentación mostrará que, sin la Ceroidad, Dios no habría podido transformar la nada en el conjunto vacío y, por tanto, no habría podido crear los elementos de la Primeridad. Esto puede ilustrarse con un experimento mental, en el que se hace evidente que, sin el conjunto vacío, no habrían surgido los continuos de la luminosidad y la coloreidad. Es decir, sin la Ceroidad del conjunto vacío, todo intento de crear los colores habría quedado absorbido en el caos de la nada.
|
| description_eng |
The purpose of this article is to explore the idea that, although Zeroness was coined by Deleuze and not by Peirce, there is no problem in considering it as the formal antecedent of Firstness. The argumentation will show that, without Zeroness, God could not have transformed nothingness into the empty set and, therefore, could not have created the elements of Firstness. This can be illustrated by a thought experiment in which it becomes evident that without the empty set, the continua of luminosity and color could not have arisen. In other words, without the Zeroness of the empty set, any attempt to create the colors would have been absorbed in the chaos of nothing.
|
| author |
Camargo Flórez, Martín Alonso |
| author_facet |
Camargo Flórez, Martín Alonso |
| topicspa_str_mv |
metafísica nada conjunto vacío continuo color semiótica estructura del conocimiento semántica |
| topic |
metafísica nada conjunto vacío continuo color semiótica estructura del conocimiento semántica semantics empty set nothing metaphysics continuum structure of knowledge semiotics color |
| topic_facet |
metafísica nada conjunto vacío continuo color semiótica estructura del conocimiento semántica semantics empty set nothing metaphysics continuum structure of knowledge semiotics color |
| citationvolume |
19 |
| citationissue |
1 |
| publisher |
Universidad de San Buenaventura Cali |
| ispartofjournal |
Revista Guillermo de Ockham |
| source |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/view/4845 |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| references |
CP (1994). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds.) Vol. 1-6 (1931-1935), A.W. Burks (ed.) Vols. 7-8. (1958-1966) Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Past Masters Collection: Intelex Corporation. EP2 (1998). The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings. Volume 2 (1893-1913). N. Houser et al. (Eds). Indiana University Press. OFR1 (2012) Obra filosófica reunida. Tomo I (1867 – 1893). (D. McNabb trad.). Fondo de Cultura Económica. OFR2 (2012). Obra filosófica reunida. Tomo II (1893 – 1913). (D. McNabb trad.). Fondo de Cultura Económica. PM (2010). Philosophy of Mathematics. Selected Writings. M. E. Moore (Ed.). Indiana University Press. TCD (2014). The Commens Dictionary: Peirce’s Terms in His Own Words. New. M. Bergman & S. Paavola (Eds.). http://www.commens.org/dictionary W4 (1989). Writings of Charles S. Peirce. A Chronological Edition. Volume 4 (1879-1884). Christian J. W. Kloesel et al. (Eds.) Indiana University Press. W6 (2000). Writings of Charles S. Peirce. A Chronological Edition. Volume 6 (1886-1890). N. Houser et al. (eds.) Indiana University Press. Bowden, S. Bignall, S. y Patton, P. (2014). Deleuzian Encounters with Pragmatism. En Sean Bowden, Simone Bignall y Paul Patton (eds.) Deleuze and Pragmatism. (Primera edición, pp. 1-17). De Gruyter Mouton. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315764870 Brier, S. (2014). Pure Zero, en T. Thellefsen and B. Sørensen (Eds.) Charles Sanders Peirce in His Own Words. 100 Years of Semiotics, Communication and Cognition. (Primera edición, pp. 207-212). De Gruyter Mouton. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614516415.207 Buczynska-Garewicz, H. (1979). “The degenerate sign”. Semiosis 13. Internationale Zeitschrift für Semiotik und Ästhetik, 4(1), 5-16. URL: https://zkm.de/media/file/de/1979-semiosis-13_05-16_buczynska-garewicz.pdf Deamer, D. (2014). Deleuze, Japanese Cinema, and the Atom Bomb. The Spectre of Impossibility. Bloomsbury Publishing Inc. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501300158 Deamer, D. (2016). Deleuze’s Cinema Books: Three Introductions to the Taxonomy of Images. Edinburgh University Press. Deledalle, G. (1996). Leer a Peirce hoy. Gedisa. Deleuze, G. (1983). Cinéma 1. L’image-mouvement. Les Éditions de Minuit. Deleuze, G. (1985). Cinéma 2. L’image-temps. Les Éditions de Minuit. Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations: 1972-1990. M. Joughin (Trad.). Columbia University Press. Eco. U. (1976). “Peirce’s Notion of Interpretant”. MLN, 91 (6), 1457-1472. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2907146 Eco, U. (2014). From the Tree to the Labyrinth: Historical Studies on the Sign and Interpretation. Harvard University Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674728165 Fernandes. D. (2019). Critique of Zeroness: Understanding Deleuze’s (Mis)understanding of Peirce. Cognitio-Estudos: Revista Eletrônica de Filosofia, 16 (1), 55-66. Doi: https://doi.org/10.23925/1809-8428.2019v16i1p55-66 Forster, P. (2011). Peirce and the Threat of Nominalism. Cambridge University Press. Girel, M. (2014). Peirce’s Reception in France. Just a Beginning. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy. 4(1), 1-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.485 Gorlée, D.L. (2014). Peirce’s Logotheca. En T. Thellefsen y B. Sørensen (Eds.) Charles Sanders Peirce in His Own Words. 100 Years of Semiotics, Communication and Cognition. (Primera edición, pp. 405-409). De Gruyter Mouton. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614516415.405 Ji, S. (2017). Neo-semiotics: Introducing Zeroness into Peircean Semiotics may bridge the Knowable and the Unknowable. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 131, 387-401. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.09.012 Ji, S. (2018). The Cell Language Theory: Connecting Mind and Matter. World Scientific Publising Europe Ltd. Doi https://doi.org/10.1142/p758 Liszka, J.J. (1996). A General Introduction to the Semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Indiana University Press. Manteghi Fasayi, G. y Akrami, M. (2012). Gilles Deleuze: Beyond Peirce’s Semiotics. The Quarterly Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 6 (11), 15-37. URL: https://journals.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_73.html?lang=en Merrell, F. (2010). Entangling Forms within Semiosic Processes. De Gruyter Mouton. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245585 Merrell, F. (2014). “Bridging Ancient and Contemporary Knowing”. En T. Thellefsen and B. Sørensen (Eds.) Charles Sanders Peirce in His Own Words. 100 Years of Semiotics, Communication and Cognition. (Primera edición, pp. 235-238). De Gruyter Mouton. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614516415.235 Myrvold, W. C. (1995). Peirce on Cantor’s Paradox and the Continuum. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 31 (3), 508-541. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40320556 O’Neill, E.R. (1998). Apprehending Deleuze Apprehending Cinema. Film-Philosophy, 2 (1), 1-27. Doi: https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/pdfplus/10.3366/film.1998.0002 Potter, V. G. y Shields, P.B. (1977). Peirce’s Definitions of Continuity. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 13 (1), 20-34. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319797 Quilter, J.G. (2010). Ontology and Providence in Creation: Taking Ex Nihilo Seriously (review). Ars Disputandi. 10 (1) 52-58. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15665399.2010.10820015 Rodowick, D.N. (1997). Gilles Deleuze’s Time Machine. Duke University Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822396871 Rossi, M. (2019). The Republic of Color. Science, Perception, and the Making of Modern America. The University of Chicago Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226651866.001.0001 Saunders, B. (2009). Peirce on Colour (with Reference to Wittgenstein). En J. Wang, K. Puhl, and V. A. Munz (Eds.) A Selection of Papers from the International Wittgenstein Symposia in Kirchberg am Wechse. URL: http://wittgensteinrepository.org/agora-alws/article/view/2814/3352 Sonesson, G. (2013). The Natural History of Branching: Approaches to the Phenomenology of Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness. Signs and Society, 1 (2), 297-325. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/673251 Spinks, C.W. (1991). Peirce and Triadomania. A Walk in the Semiotic Wilderness. Mouton de Gruyter. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110854114 Stivale, C.J. (2003). Deleuze on Cinema (review). Criticism, 45(4), 529-532. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2004.0027 Vericat, J.F. (1994). Color as Abstraction. En G. Debrock y M. Hulswit (Eds.) Living Doubt: Essays concerning the Epistemology of Charles Sanders Peirce. (1994, pp. 289-302). Kluwer Academic. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8252-0_26 |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2021-05-31 |
| date_accessioned |
2021-05-31T21:25:13Z |
| date_available |
2021-05-31T21:25:13Z |
| url |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/view/4845 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.4845 |
| eissn |
2256-3202 |
| doi |
10.21500/22563202.4845 |
| citationstartpage |
79 |
| citationendpage |
93 |
| url4_str_mv |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/download/4845/4092 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/download/4845/4091 |
| _version_ |
1797160225201979392 |
| spelling |
¿Puede prescindir Dios de la Ceroidad? Deleuze, Peirce y un experimento mental con colores info:eu-repo/semantics/article application/pdf text/xml https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/view/4845 Español http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. CP (1994). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds.) Vol. 1-6 (1931-1935), A.W. Burks (ed.) Vols. 7-8. (1958-1966) Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Past Masters Collection: Intelex Corporation. EP2 (1998). The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings. Volume 2 (1893-1913). N. Houser et al. (Eds). Indiana University Press. OFR1 (2012) Obra filosófica reunida. Tomo I (1867 – 1893). (D. McNabb trad.). Fondo de Cultura Económica. OFR2 (2012). Obra filosófica reunida. Tomo II (1893 – 1913). (D. McNabb trad.). Fondo de Cultura Económica. PM (2010). Philosophy of Mathematics. Selected Writings. M. E. Moore (Ed.). Indiana University Press. TCD (2014). The Commens Dictionary: Peirce’s Terms in His Own Words. New. M. Bergman & S. Paavola (Eds.). http://www.commens.org/dictionary W4 (1989). Writings of Charles S. Peirce. A Chronological Edition. Volume 4 (1879-1884). Christian J. W. Kloesel et al. (Eds.) Indiana University Press. W6 (2000). Writings of Charles S. Peirce. A Chronological Edition. Volume 6 (1886-1890). N. Houser et al. (eds.) Indiana University Press. Bowden, S. Bignall, S. y Patton, P. (2014). Deleuzian Encounters with Pragmatism. En Sean Bowden, Simone Bignall y Paul Patton (eds.) Deleuze and Pragmatism. (Primera edición, pp. 1-17). De Gruyter Mouton. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315764870 Brier, S. (2014). Pure Zero, en T. Thellefsen and B. Sørensen (Eds.) Charles Sanders Peirce in His Own Words. 100 Years of Semiotics, Communication and Cognition. (Primera edición, pp. 207-212). De Gruyter Mouton. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614516415.207 Buczynska-Garewicz, H. (1979). “The degenerate sign”. Semiosis 13. Internationale Zeitschrift für Semiotik und Ästhetik, 4(1), 5-16. URL: https://zkm.de/media/file/de/1979-semiosis-13_05-16_buczynska-garewicz.pdf Deamer, D. (2014). Deleuze, Japanese Cinema, and the Atom Bomb. The Spectre of Impossibility. Bloomsbury Publishing Inc. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501300158 Deamer, D. (2016). Deleuze’s Cinema Books: Three Introductions to the Taxonomy of Images. Edinburgh University Press. Deledalle, G. (1996). Leer a Peirce hoy. Gedisa. Deleuze, G. (1983). Cinéma 1. L’image-mouvement. Les Éditions de Minuit. Deleuze, G. (1985). Cinéma 2. L’image-temps. Les Éditions de Minuit. Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations: 1972-1990. M. Joughin (Trad.). Columbia University Press. Eco. U. (1976). “Peirce’s Notion of Interpretant”. MLN, 91 (6), 1457-1472. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2907146 Eco, U. (2014). From the Tree to the Labyrinth: Historical Studies on the Sign and Interpretation. Harvard University Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674728165 Fernandes. D. (2019). Critique of Zeroness: Understanding Deleuze’s (Mis)understanding of Peirce. Cognitio-Estudos: Revista Eletrônica de Filosofia, 16 (1), 55-66. Doi: https://doi.org/10.23925/1809-8428.2019v16i1p55-66 Forster, P. (2011). Peirce and the Threat of Nominalism. Cambridge University Press. Girel, M. (2014). Peirce’s Reception in France. Just a Beginning. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy. 4(1), 1-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.485 Gorlée, D.L. (2014). Peirce’s Logotheca. En T. Thellefsen y B. Sørensen (Eds.) Charles Sanders Peirce in His Own Words. 100 Years of Semiotics, Communication and Cognition. (Primera edición, pp. 405-409). De Gruyter Mouton. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614516415.405 Ji, S. (2017). Neo-semiotics: Introducing Zeroness into Peircean Semiotics may bridge the Knowable and the Unknowable. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 131, 387-401. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.09.012 Ji, S. (2018). The Cell Language Theory: Connecting Mind and Matter. World Scientific Publising Europe Ltd. Doi https://doi.org/10.1142/p758 Liszka, J.J. (1996). A General Introduction to the Semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Indiana University Press. Manteghi Fasayi, G. y Akrami, M. (2012). Gilles Deleuze: Beyond Peirce’s Semiotics. The Quarterly Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 6 (11), 15-37. URL: https://journals.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_73.html?lang=en Merrell, F. (2010). Entangling Forms within Semiosic Processes. De Gruyter Mouton. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245585 Merrell, F. (2014). “Bridging Ancient and Contemporary Knowing”. En T. Thellefsen and B. Sørensen (Eds.) Charles Sanders Peirce in His Own Words. 100 Years of Semiotics, Communication and Cognition. (Primera edición, pp. 235-238). De Gruyter Mouton. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614516415.235 Myrvold, W. C. (1995). Peirce on Cantor’s Paradox and the Continuum. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 31 (3), 508-541. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40320556 O’Neill, E.R. (1998). Apprehending Deleuze Apprehending Cinema. Film-Philosophy, 2 (1), 1-27. Doi: https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/pdfplus/10.3366/film.1998.0002 Potter, V. G. y Shields, P.B. (1977). Peirce’s Definitions of Continuity. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 13 (1), 20-34. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319797 Quilter, J.G. (2010). Ontology and Providence in Creation: Taking Ex Nihilo Seriously (review). Ars Disputandi. 10 (1) 52-58. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15665399.2010.10820015 Rodowick, D.N. (1997). Gilles Deleuze’s Time Machine. Duke University Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822396871 Rossi, M. (2019). The Republic of Color. Science, Perception, and the Making of Modern America. The University of Chicago Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226651866.001.0001 Saunders, B. (2009). Peirce on Colour (with Reference to Wittgenstein). En J. Wang, K. Puhl, and V. A. Munz (Eds.) A Selection of Papers from the International Wittgenstein Symposia in Kirchberg am Wechse. URL: http://wittgensteinrepository.org/agora-alws/article/view/2814/3352 Sonesson, G. (2013). The Natural History of Branching: Approaches to the Phenomenology of Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness. Signs and Society, 1 (2), 297-325. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/673251 Spinks, C.W. (1991). Peirce and Triadomania. A Walk in the Semiotic Wilderness. Mouton de Gruyter. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110854114 Stivale, C.J. (2003). Deleuze on Cinema (review). Criticism, 45(4), 529-532. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2004.0027 Vericat, J.F. (1994). Color as Abstraction. En G. Debrock y M. Hulswit (Eds.) Living Doubt: Essays concerning the Epistemology of Charles Sanders Peirce. (1994, pp. 289-302). Kluwer Academic. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8252-0_26 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Artículo de revista http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text ¿Puede prescindir Dios de la Ceroidad? Deleuze, Peirce y un experimento mental con colores Publication El propósito de este artículo es explorar la idea de que, aun cuando la Ceroidad fue acuñada por Deleuze y no por Peirce, no hay ningún problema en considerarla como el antecedente formal de la Primeridad. La argumentación mostrará que, sin la Ceroidad, Dios no habría podido transformar la nada en el conjunto vacío y, por tanto, no habría podido crear los elementos de la Primeridad. Esto puede ilustrarse con un experimento mental, en el que se hace evidente que, sin el conjunto vacío, no habrían surgido los continuos de la luminosidad y la coloreidad. Es decir, sin la Ceroidad del conjunto vacío, todo intento de crear los colores habría quedado absorbido en el caos de la nada. metafísica nada conjunto vacío continuo color semiótica estructura del conocimiento semántica semantics empty set The purpose of this article is to explore the idea that, although Zeroness was coined by Deleuze and not by Peirce, there is no problem in considering it as the formal antecedent of Firstness. The argumentation will show that, without Zeroness, God could not have transformed nothingness into the empty set and, therefore, could not have created the elements of Firstness. This can be illustrated by a thought experiment in which it becomes evident that without the empty set, the continua of luminosity and color could not have arisen. In other words, without the Zeroness of the empty set, any attempt to create the colors would have been absorbed in the chaos of nothing. Camargo Flórez, Martín Alonso 19 nothing Universidad de San Buenaventura Cali metaphysics continuum 1 structure of knowledge Journal article Revista Guillermo de Ockham semiotics color 2021-05-31T21:25:13Z 2021-05-31T21:25:13Z https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.4845 10.21500/22563202.4845 https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/download/4845/4092 https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/download/4845/4091 93 79 2256-3202 2021-05-31 |