Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS)
Objetivo. El objetivo de este estudio fue establecer valores normativos para la escala Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) en población comunitaria española (sin problemas de voz), utilizando una muestra de un área extensa del sureste de España. Metodología. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 115 personas (60 mujeres y 55 hombres) con edades comprendidas entre los 16 y 87 años. Los participantes eran familiares que acompañaron a los pacientes a las sesiones clínicas de ORL y de Logopedia de un hospital de referencia de la Región de Murcia, así como personal del hospital. Todos declararon no padecer ningún trastorno de la voz. Resultados. Los valores normativos obtenidos en este estudio para el VoiSS fueron 14.61 (SD=8.18) para la puntuación total, 7.5... Ver más
Guardado en:
2665-2056
5
2023-11-30
37
49
Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2023
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
| id |
bea1e7412ecfb9ce626d5262e80dd7b5 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
FUNDACION UNIVERSITARIA MARIA CANO |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/FUNDACIONUNIVERSITARIAMARIACANO/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud |
| title |
Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) |
| spellingShingle |
Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) Gómez-Cobos, Lidia Monteagudo-Santamaría, María Cabello Luque, Francisco Velandrino-Nicolás, Antonio calidad de la voz estadísticas poblacionales autoinforme cuestionario escala ronquera psicometría trastornos de la voz VoiSS voice disorders self report voice VoiSS voice hoarseness scale questionnaire population statistics voice quality psychometrics |
| title_short |
Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) |
| title_full |
Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) |
| title_fullStr |
Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) |
| title_sort |
valores normativos para la versión española de la voice symptom scale (voiss) |
| description |
Objetivo. El objetivo de este estudio fue establecer valores normativos para la escala Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) en población comunitaria española (sin problemas de voz), utilizando una muestra de un área extensa del sureste de España.
Metodología. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 115 personas (60 mujeres y 55 hombres) con edades comprendidas entre los 16 y 87 años. Los participantes eran familiares que acompañaron a los pacientes a las sesiones clínicas de ORL y de Logopedia de un hospital de referencia de la Región de Murcia, así como personal del hospital. Todos declararon no padecer ningún trastorno de la voz.
Resultados. Los valores normativos obtenidos en este estudio para el VoiSS fueron 14.61 (SD=8.18) para la puntuación total, 7.57 (SD = 5.42) para la subescala Limitación, 1.04 (SD = 1.65) para la subescala Emocional y 5.99 (SD = 3.61) para la subescala Física. Los valores percentílicos se obtuvieron también para la escala VoiSS y para sus tres subescalas.
Conclusiones. Este estudio presenta valores normativos para la escala VoiSS que no han sido todavía obtenidos en España. Estos valores pueden utilizarse como referencia para detectar posibles trastornos de voz.
|
| description_eng |
Objective. The aim of this study was to establish normative values for the Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) in the Spanish community population (without voice problems), using a sample from a large area of southeastern Spain.
Method. The sample consisted of 115 adults from ages 16 to 87, 60 of whom were women and 55 were men. Participants included the family members of patients who attended the Otorhinolaryngology (ENT) and Speech Therapy Clinic at a referral hospital in the region of Murcia, Spain, and some of the clinic’s staff. All the participants reported never having suffered from any voice disorder before.
Results. The normative values obtained in this study for the VoiSS were 14.61 (SD=8.18) for the total score, 7.57 (SD = 5.42) for the Impairment subscale, 1.04 (SD = 1.65) for the Emotional subscale, and 5.99 (SD = 3.61) for the Physical subscale. The percentile values were also obtained for the VoiSS scale and for its three subscales.
Conclusions. This study presents normative values for the VoiSS scale that have not previously been obtained in Spain. These values can be used as a reference to detect possible voice disorders.
|
| author |
Gómez-Cobos, Lidia Monteagudo-Santamaría, María Cabello Luque, Francisco Velandrino-Nicolás, Antonio |
| author_facet |
Gómez-Cobos, Lidia Monteagudo-Santamaría, María Cabello Luque, Francisco Velandrino-Nicolás, Antonio |
| topicspa_str_mv |
calidad de la voz estadísticas poblacionales autoinforme cuestionario escala ronquera psicometría trastornos de la voz VoiSS |
| topic |
calidad de la voz estadísticas poblacionales autoinforme cuestionario escala ronquera psicometría trastornos de la voz VoiSS voice disorders self report voice VoiSS voice hoarseness scale questionnaire population statistics voice quality psychometrics |
| topic_facet |
calidad de la voz estadísticas poblacionales autoinforme cuestionario escala ronquera psicometría trastornos de la voz VoiSS voice disorders self report voice VoiSS voice hoarseness scale questionnaire population statistics voice quality psychometrics |
| citationvolume |
5 |
| citationissue |
2 |
| publisher |
Fundación Universitaria María Cano |
| ispartofjournal |
Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud |
| source |
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/228 |
| language |
Inglés |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2023 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| references_eng |
Hogikyan ND, Rosen CA. A Review of Outcome Measurements for Voice Disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2002 May;126(5):562–72. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2002.124850 2. World Health Organization. WHOQOL measuring quality of life [Internet]. New York: WHO; 2012. Available from: https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol 3. Lohr K. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(3):193-205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015291021312 4. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, Scott JA, Rock EP, Dawisha S, et al. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health. 2007;10(suppl 2):S125-37.. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00275.x 5. Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, Cornut G, Crevier-Buchman L, Friedrich G, et al. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2001 Feb;258(2):77–82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004050000299 6. Branski RC, Cukier-Blaj S, Pusic A, Cano SJ, Klassen A, Mener D, et al. Measuring quality of life in dysphonic patients: A systematic review of content development in patient-reported outcomes measures. J Voice. 2010;24(2):193-8. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.05.006 7. Francis DO, Daniero JJ, Hovis KL, Sathe N, Jacobson B, Penson DF, et al. Voice-related patient-reported outcome measures: A systematic review of instrument development and validation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(1):62-88. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0022 8. Deary IJ, Wilson JA, Carding PN, McKenzie, K. VoiSS: a patient-derived voice symptom scale. J Psychosom Res. 2003;54(5):483-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00469-5 9. Webb AL, Carding PN, Deary IJ, MacKenzie K, Steen IN, Wilson JA. Optimising outcome assessment of voice interventions, I: Reliability and validity of three self-reported scales. J Laryng Otol. 2007;121(8):763-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215107007177 10. Steen IN, Mackenzie K, Carding PN, Webb A, Deary IJ, Wilson JA. Optimising outcome assessment of voice interventions, II: Sensitivity to change of self-reported and observer-rated measures. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;122(1):46-51. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215107007839 11. Behlau M, Madazio G, Moreti F, Oliveira G, Alves Dos Santos LdM, Paulinelli BR, et al. Efficiency and cutoff values of self-Assessment instruments on the impact of a voice problem. J Voice. 2016;30(4): 506.e9-506.e18. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.05.022 12. Wilson JA, Webb A, Carding PN, Steen IN, MacKenzie K, Deary IJ. The Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) and the Vocal Handicap Index (VHI): a comparison of structure and content. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci [Internet]. 2004 Apr; 2004 Apr 26;29(2):169-74. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-7772.2004.00775.x 13. Carding PN, Steen I, Webb A, Mackenzie K, Deary IJ, Wilson JA. The reliability and sensitivity to change of acoustic measures of voice quality. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 Sep 15;29(5):538-44. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00846.x 14. Wilson JA, Webb AL, Carding PN, Steen N, MacKenzie K, Deary IJ. The Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) and the Vocal Handicap Index (VHI): a comparison of structure and content. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004;29(2):169-74. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-7772.2004.00775.x 15. Mozzanica F, Robotti C, Ginocchio D, Bulgheroni C, Lorusso R, Behlau M et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian Version of the Voice Symptom Scale (I-VoiSS). J Voice. 2017;31(6):773e1-e10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.02.001 16. Moreti F, Zambon F, Oliveira G, Behlau M. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and cutoff values of the Brazilian version of the Voice Symptom Scale—VoiSS. J Voice. 2014;28(4):458-68. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.11.009 17. Son H, Lee C, Kim K, Kim S, Jeong H, Kim J. The Korean version of the Voice Symptom Scale for patients with thyroid operation, and its use in a validation and reliability study. J Voice. 2018;32(3):367-73. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.06.003 18. Velandrino A, Cabello F, Parra M, Nicolás MJ, Losana E. Cultural adaptation and pilot study of the Spanish version of the Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS). Rev Log Fon Aud. 2018;38(4):141-84. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2018.07.003 19. Ruston FC, Moreti F, Vivero M, Malebran C, Behlau M. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Chilean version of the Voice Symptom Scale - VoiSS. Codas. 2016;28(5):625-33. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015249 20. Contreras F, Moreti F, Vivero M, Malebran C, Behlau M. Cross-Cultural adaptation, validation, and cutoff values of the Chilean version of the Voice Symptom Scale: VoiSS. J Voice. 2021;35(3):498.e31-498.e38. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.09.020 21. Correa S, Ribeiro VV, Behlau M. Chilean's Self-Perception of Their Self-Regulatory Behaviors and Vocal Symptoms. J Voice. 2022;36(2):292.e23-292.e28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.04.036 22. Arffa RE, Krishna P, Gartner-Schmidt J, Rose CA. Normative values for the Voice Handicap Index-10. J Voice. 2012;26(4):462-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.04.006 23. Sobol M, Sielska-Badurek, EM, Osuch-Wójcikiewicz E. Normative values for singing voice handicap index - systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;86(4):497-501. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.12.004 24. Jamovi [computer program on the internet]. Version 2.3. 2023. Available from: https://www.jamovi.org 25. Botella Ausina J, Sánchez Meca J. Meta-análisis en ciencias sociales y de la salud. Madrid: Síntesis; 2015. 266 p. Available from:: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=746252 26. Abad FJ, Olea J, Ponsoda V, García C. Medición en ciencas sociales y de la salud. Madrid: Síntesis; 2011. 566 p. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=552272 27. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. 2015. 28. Fayers PM, Machin, D. Quality of Life. The assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. London: John Wiley & Sons; 2016. 648 p. 29. Newborg J, Stock J, Wnek L. Inventario de Desarollo Batelle. Manual de aplicación. Madrid: Tea Ediciones; 2011. 168 p. 30. Dunn LM, Dunn, Leota M, Arribas D. PPVT-III Peabody. Test de vocabulario en imágenes: Manual. Madrid: TEA; 2010. 102 p. 31. Hartnick CJ, Volk M, Cunningham, M. Establishing normative voice-related quality of life scores within the pediatric otolaryngology population. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(10):1090-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.129.10.1090 32. Blumin J., Keppel KL, Braun NM, Kerschner JE, Merati AL. The impact of gender and age on voice related quality of life in children: Normative data. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72(2):229-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.10.015 |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2023-11-30 |
| date_accessioned |
2023-11-30T16:21:14Z |
| date_available |
2023-11-30T16:21:14Z |
| url |
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/228 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.228 |
| eissn |
2665-2056 |
| doi |
10.46634/riics.228 |
| citationstartpage |
37 |
| citationendpage |
49 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/228/845 |
| url4_str_mv |
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/228/844 |
| url3_str_mv |
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/228/843 |
| _version_ |
1797159938458386432 |
| spelling |
Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) calidad de la voz Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) Artículo de revista estadísticas poblacionales autoinforme cuestionario escala ronquera psicometría trastornos de la voz voz VoiSS Objetivo. El objetivo de este estudio fue establecer valores normativos para la escala Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) en población comunitaria española (sin problemas de voz), utilizando una muestra de un área extensa del sureste de España. Metodología. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 115 personas (60 mujeres y 55 hombres) con edades comprendidas entre los 16 y 87 años. Los participantes eran familiares que acompañaron a los pacientes a las sesiones clínicas de ORL y de Logopedia de un hospital de referencia de la Región de Murcia, así como personal del hospital. Todos declararon no padecer ningún trastorno de la voz. Resultados. Los valores normativos obtenidos en este estudio para el VoiSS fueron 14.61 (SD=8.18) para la puntuación total, 7.57 (SD = 5.42) para la subescala Limitación, 1.04 (SD = 1.65) para la subescala Emocional y 5.99 (SD = 3.61) para la subescala Física. Los valores percentílicos se obtuvieron también para la escala VoiSS y para sus tres subescalas. Conclusiones. Este estudio presenta valores normativos para la escala VoiSS que no han sido todavía obtenidos en España. Estos valores pueden utilizarse como referencia para detectar posibles trastornos de voz. application/pdf Text Fundación Universitaria María Cano Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/228 Inglés https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2023 Hogikyan ND, Rosen CA. A Review of Outcome Measurements for Voice Disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2002 May;126(5):562–72. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2002.124850 2. World Health Organization. WHOQOL measuring quality of life [Internet]. New York: WHO; 2012. Available from: https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol 3. Lohr K. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(3):193-205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015291021312 4. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, Scott JA, Rock EP, Dawisha S, et al. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health. 2007;10(suppl 2):S125-37.. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00275.x 5. Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, Cornut G, Crevier-Buchman L, Friedrich G, et al. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2001 Feb;258(2):77–82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004050000299 6. Branski RC, Cukier-Blaj S, Pusic A, Cano SJ, Klassen A, Mener D, et al. Measuring quality of life in dysphonic patients: A systematic review of content development in patient-reported outcomes measures. J Voice. 2010;24(2):193-8. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.05.006 7. Francis DO, Daniero JJ, Hovis KL, Sathe N, Jacobson B, Penson DF, et al. Voice-related patient-reported outcome measures: A systematic review of instrument development and validation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(1):62-88. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0022 8. Deary IJ, Wilson JA, Carding PN, McKenzie, K. VoiSS: a patient-derived voice symptom scale. J Psychosom Res. 2003;54(5):483-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00469-5 9. Webb AL, Carding PN, Deary IJ, MacKenzie K, Steen IN, Wilson JA. Optimising outcome assessment of voice interventions, I: Reliability and validity of three self-reported scales. J Laryng Otol. 2007;121(8):763-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215107007177 10. Steen IN, Mackenzie K, Carding PN, Webb A, Deary IJ, Wilson JA. Optimising outcome assessment of voice interventions, II: Sensitivity to change of self-reported and observer-rated measures. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;122(1):46-51. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215107007839 11. Behlau M, Madazio G, Moreti F, Oliveira G, Alves Dos Santos LdM, Paulinelli BR, et al. Efficiency and cutoff values of self-Assessment instruments on the impact of a voice problem. J Voice. 2016;30(4): 506.e9-506.e18. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.05.022 12. Wilson JA, Webb A, Carding PN, Steen IN, MacKenzie K, Deary IJ. The Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) and the Vocal Handicap Index (VHI): a comparison of structure and content. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci [Internet]. 2004 Apr; 2004 Apr 26;29(2):169-74. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-7772.2004.00775.x 13. Carding PN, Steen I, Webb A, Mackenzie K, Deary IJ, Wilson JA. The reliability and sensitivity to change of acoustic measures of voice quality. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 Sep 15;29(5):538-44. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00846.x 14. Wilson JA, Webb AL, Carding PN, Steen N, MacKenzie K, Deary IJ. The Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) and the Vocal Handicap Index (VHI): a comparison of structure and content. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004;29(2):169-74. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-7772.2004.00775.x 15. Mozzanica F, Robotti C, Ginocchio D, Bulgheroni C, Lorusso R, Behlau M et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian Version of the Voice Symptom Scale (I-VoiSS). J Voice. 2017;31(6):773e1-e10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.02.001 16. Moreti F, Zambon F, Oliveira G, Behlau M. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and cutoff values of the Brazilian version of the Voice Symptom Scale—VoiSS. J Voice. 2014;28(4):458-68. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.11.009 17. Son H, Lee C, Kim K, Kim S, Jeong H, Kim J. The Korean version of the Voice Symptom Scale for patients with thyroid operation, and its use in a validation and reliability study. J Voice. 2018;32(3):367-73. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.06.003 18. Velandrino A, Cabello F, Parra M, Nicolás MJ, Losana E. Cultural adaptation and pilot study of the Spanish version of the Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS). Rev Log Fon Aud. 2018;38(4):141-84. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2018.07.003 19. Ruston FC, Moreti F, Vivero M, Malebran C, Behlau M. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Chilean version of the Voice Symptom Scale - VoiSS. Codas. 2016;28(5):625-33. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015249 20. Contreras F, Moreti F, Vivero M, Malebran C, Behlau M. Cross-Cultural adaptation, validation, and cutoff values of the Chilean version of the Voice Symptom Scale: VoiSS. J Voice. 2021;35(3):498.e31-498.e38. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.09.020 21. Correa S, Ribeiro VV, Behlau M. Chilean's Self-Perception of Their Self-Regulatory Behaviors and Vocal Symptoms. J Voice. 2022;36(2):292.e23-292.e28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.04.036 22. Arffa RE, Krishna P, Gartner-Schmidt J, Rose CA. Normative values for the Voice Handicap Index-10. J Voice. 2012;26(4):462-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.04.006 23. Sobol M, Sielska-Badurek, EM, Osuch-Wójcikiewicz E. Normative values for singing voice handicap index - systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;86(4):497-501. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.12.004 24. Jamovi [computer program on the internet]. Version 2.3. 2023. Available from: https://www.jamovi.org 25. Botella Ausina J, Sánchez Meca J. Meta-análisis en ciencias sociales y de la salud. Madrid: Síntesis; 2015. 266 p. Available from:: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=746252 26. Abad FJ, Olea J, Ponsoda V, García C. Medición en ciencas sociales y de la salud. Madrid: Síntesis; 2011. 566 p. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=552272 27. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. 2015. 28. Fayers PM, Machin, D. Quality of Life. The assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. London: John Wiley & Sons; 2016. 648 p. 29. Newborg J, Stock J, Wnek L. Inventario de Desarollo Batelle. Manual de aplicación. Madrid: Tea Ediciones; 2011. 168 p. 30. Dunn LM, Dunn, Leota M, Arribas D. PPVT-III Peabody. Test de vocabulario en imágenes: Manual. Madrid: TEA; 2010. 102 p. 31. Hartnick CJ, Volk M, Cunningham, M. Establishing normative voice-related quality of life scores within the pediatric otolaryngology population. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(10):1090-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.129.10.1090 32. Blumin J., Keppel KL, Braun NM, Kerschner JE, Merati AL. The impact of gender and age on voice related quality of life in children: Normative data. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72(2):229-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.10.015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART text/html http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion text/xml Publication voice disorders self report voice VoiSS voice hoarseness Gómez-Cobos, Lidia Monteagudo-Santamaría, María scale questionnaire population statistics voice quality Cabello Luque, Francisco Velandrino-Nicolás, Antonio psychometrics Objective. The aim of this study was to establish normative values for the Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) in the Spanish community population (without voice problems), using a sample from a large area of southeastern Spain. Method. The sample consisted of 115 adults from ages 16 to 87, 60 of whom were women and 55 were men. Participants included the family members of patients who attended the Otorhinolaryngology (ENT) and Speech Therapy Clinic at a referral hospital in the region of Murcia, Spain, and some of the clinic’s staff. All the participants reported never having suffered from any voice disorder before. Results. The normative values obtained in this study for the VoiSS were 14.61 (SD=8.18) for the total score, 7.57 (SD = 5.42) for the Impairment subscale, 1.04 (SD = 1.65) for the Emotional subscale, and 5.99 (SD = 3.61) for the Physical subscale. The percentile values were also obtained for the VoiSS scale and for its three subscales. Conclusions. This study presents normative values for the VoiSS scale that have not previously been obtained in Spain. These values can be used as a reference to detect possible voice disorders. 5 2 Journal article 2023-11-30 49 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/228/845 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/228/844 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/228/843 2023-11-30T16:21:14Z 37 https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.228 10.46634/riics.228 2665-2056 2023-11-30T16:21:14Z |