Una revisión de “Liberalismo político” de Rawls
La obra Liberalismo político de John Rawls ha sido objeto de una amplia y profunda literatura filosófica, la mayoría de una excelente calidad. En este escenario es difícil decir algo nuevo sobre los tópicos más relevantes de su trabajo y salir airosa de los debates por ella suscitados. Por tanto, he decidido concentrar mi atención en algunos tópicos donde existe la posibilidad de una aproximación alternativa que pueda generar lecturas remozadas del texto de Rawls: la distinción entre doctrinas comprehensivas “razonables” e “irrazonables”; los fundamentos psicológicos del liberalismo político; y la posibilidad de que el liberalismo político pueda extenderse más allá del pequeño grupo de sociedades occidentales que Rawls identificó como su ce... Ver más
Guardado en:
0122-9893
2346-2051
2014-07-23
5
33
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
| id |
bdc24db7eb0fceb5b2135f99ab0bc919 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
Una revisión de “Liberalismo político” de Rawls Okin, Susan Moller. 1994. "Political Liberalism, Justice, and Gender". En Ethics 105: 23-43. Revista Derecho del Estado https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/3812 Español https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Audi, Robert. 1989. "The Separation of Church and State and the Obligations of Citizenship". En Philosophy and Public Affairs 18: 259-296. Branch, Taylor. 1997. Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years, 1963-65. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster. Eberle, Christopher. J. 2002. Religious Conviction in Liberal Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Freeman, Samuel. 2003. "Congruence and the Good of Justice". En The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. S. Freeman, ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Gutmann, Amy y Dennis Thompson, eds. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. London: Harvard University Press. Larmore, Charles. 2003. "Public Reason". En The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. S. Freeman, ed., 368-393. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2000. Women and Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2003. "Rawls and Feminism". En The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. S. Freeman, ed., 488-520. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2004. Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2011. "Perfectionist Liberalism and Political Liberalism". En Philosophy and Public Affairs. 39: 3-45. Okin, Susan Moller. 2004. "Justice and Gender: An Unfinished Debate". En Fordham Law Review 72: 1537-1567. text/html http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Text http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF info:eu-repo/semantics/article Quinn, Philipp. 1997. "Political Liberalisms and their Exclusions of the Religious". En Religion and Contemporary Liberalism. P. Weithman, ed., 138-161. Notre Dame, IL: University of Notre Dame Press. Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1997. "Why We Should Reject What Liberalism Tells Us about Speaking and Acting in Public for Religious Reasons". En Religion and Contemporary Liberalism. P. Weithman, ed., 162-181. Notre Dame, IL: University of Notre Dame Press. Weithman, Paul. 2002. Religion and the Obligation of Citizenship. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Weithman, Paul. 1999. "Citizenship and Public Reason". En Natural Law and Public Reason. R. P. George y C. Wolfe, eds., 125-170. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. Rawls, John. 1999. "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited". En John Rawls, The Law of Peoples, 129-180. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press. (1a ed. 1997.) Rawls, John. 1996. Political Liberalism. Ed. Ampliada. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (1a ed. 1993.) Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Departamento de Derecho Constitucional Publication application/pdf psicología del liberalismo La obra Liberalismo político de John Rawls ha sido objeto de una amplia y profunda literatura filosófica, la mayoría de una excelente calidad. En este escenario es difícil decir algo nuevo sobre los tópicos más relevantes de su trabajo y salir airosa de los debates por ella suscitados. Por tanto, he decidido concentrar mi atención en algunos tópicos donde existe la posibilidad de una aproximación alternativa que pueda generar lecturas remozadas del texto de Rawls: la distinción entre doctrinas comprehensivas “razonables” e “irrazonables”; los fundamentos psicológicos del liberalismo político; y la posibilidad de que el liberalismo político pueda extenderse más allá del pequeño grupo de sociedades occidentales que Rawls identificó como su centro de atención, según se desprende de sus referencias históricas. También he incluido un excurso sobre el polémico tema de la razón pública y la civilidad que difícilmente puede ser evitado dada su relevancia en el contexto de recepción del libro. El presente escrito debe leerse no como una descripción comprehensiva del trabajo de Rawls, sino como el intento personal por atrapar, de forma imperfecta e incompleta, la esencia de estos temas, tan caros para la filosofía y tan urgentes para la humanidad. Nussbaum, Martha Liberalismo político respeto reciprocidad consenso superpuesto doctrinas comprehensivas deber de civilidad razón pública trasfondo cultural concepción política sentimientos morales. 32 Núm. 32 , Año 2014 : Enero-Junio Artículo de revista Since Rawls’s Political Liberalism is by now the subject of a wide and deep philosophical literature, much of it excellent in quality, it would be foolhardy to attempt to say something about each of the major issues of the work, or to sort through debates that can easily be located elsewhere. I have therefore decided to focus on a small number of issues where there is at least some chance that a fresh approach may yield some new understanding of the text: Rawls’s distinction between “reasonable” and “unreasonable” comprehensive doctrines; the psychological underpinnings of political liberalism; and the possibility that political liberalism might be extended beyond the small group of modern Western societies that Rawls’s historical remarks suggest as its primary focus. I also include a discussion of the much-debated issue of civility and public reason, which could hardly be avoided given its prominence in the book’s reception. This paper should therefore be read not as a comprehensive account of the work but as one person’s attempt to grapple, very incompletely and imperfectly, with a book that is as great as any philosophy has seen on this topic of great human urgency. Rawls’s “Political Liberalism”. A reassessment Political liberalism respect reciprocity political conception overlapping consensus comprehensive doctrines duty of civility public reason background culture psychology of liberalism moral sentiments. Journal article https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/3812/4005 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/3812/4050 2346-2051 2014-07-23T00:00:00Z https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/3812 2014-07-23 5 33 2014-07-23T00:00:00Z 0122-9893 |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Revista Derecho del Estado |
| title |
Una revisión de “Liberalismo político” de Rawls |
| spellingShingle |
Una revisión de “Liberalismo político” de Rawls Nussbaum, Martha psicología del liberalismo Liberalismo político respeto reciprocidad consenso superpuesto doctrinas comprehensivas deber de civilidad razón pública trasfondo cultural concepción política sentimientos morales. Political liberalism respect reciprocity political conception overlapping consensus comprehensive doctrines duty of civility public reason background culture psychology of liberalism moral sentiments. |
| title_short |
Una revisión de “Liberalismo político” de Rawls |
| title_full |
Una revisión de “Liberalismo político” de Rawls |
| title_fullStr |
Una revisión de “Liberalismo político” de Rawls |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Una revisión de “Liberalismo político” de Rawls |
| title_sort |
una revisión de “liberalismo político” de rawls |
| title_eng |
Rawls’s “Political Liberalism”. A reassessment |
| description |
La obra Liberalismo político de John Rawls ha sido objeto de una amplia y profunda literatura filosófica, la mayoría de una excelente calidad. En este escenario es difícil decir algo nuevo sobre los tópicos más relevantes de su trabajo y salir airosa de los debates por ella suscitados. Por tanto, he decidido concentrar mi atención en algunos tópicos donde existe la posibilidad de una aproximación alternativa que pueda generar lecturas remozadas del texto de Rawls: la distinción entre doctrinas comprehensivas “razonables” e “irrazonables”; los fundamentos psicológicos del liberalismo político; y la posibilidad de que el liberalismo político pueda extenderse más allá del pequeño grupo de sociedades occidentales que Rawls identificó como su centro de atención, según se desprende de sus referencias históricas. También he incluido un excurso sobre el polémico tema de la razón pública y la civilidad que difícilmente puede ser evitado dada su relevancia en el contexto de recepción del libro. El presente escrito debe leerse no como una descripción comprehensiva del trabajo de Rawls, sino como el intento personal por atrapar, de forma imperfecta e incompleta, la esencia de estos temas, tan caros para la filosofía y tan urgentes para la humanidad.
|
| description_eng |
Since Rawls’s Political Liberalism is by now the subject of a wide and deep philosophical literature, much of it excellent in quality, it would be foolhardy to attempt to say something about each of the major issues of the work, or to sort through debates that can easily be located elsewhere. I have therefore decided to focus on a small number of issues where there is at least some chance that a fresh approach may yield some new understanding of the text: Rawls’s distinction between “reasonable” and “unreasonable” comprehensive doctrines; the psychological underpinnings of political liberalism; and the possibility that political liberalism might be extended beyond the small group of modern Western societies that Rawls’s historical remarks suggest as its primary focus. I also include a discussion of the much-debated issue of civility and public reason, which could hardly be avoided given its prominence in the book’s reception. This paper should therefore be read not as a comprehensive account of the work but as one person’s attempt to grapple, very incompletely and imperfectly, with a book that is as great as any philosophy has seen on this topic of great human urgency.
|
| author |
Nussbaum, Martha |
| author_facet |
Nussbaum, Martha |
| topicspa_str_mv |
psicología del liberalismo Liberalismo político respeto reciprocidad consenso superpuesto doctrinas comprehensivas deber de civilidad razón pública trasfondo cultural concepción política sentimientos morales. |
| topic |
psicología del liberalismo Liberalismo político respeto reciprocidad consenso superpuesto doctrinas comprehensivas deber de civilidad razón pública trasfondo cultural concepción política sentimientos morales. Political liberalism respect reciprocity political conception overlapping consensus comprehensive doctrines duty of civility public reason background culture psychology of liberalism moral sentiments. |
| topic_facet |
psicología del liberalismo Liberalismo político respeto reciprocidad consenso superpuesto doctrinas comprehensivas deber de civilidad razón pública trasfondo cultural concepción política sentimientos morales. Political liberalism respect reciprocity political conception overlapping consensus comprehensive doctrines duty of civility public reason background culture psychology of liberalism moral sentiments. |
| citationissue |
32 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 32 , Año 2014 : Enero-Junio |
| publisher |
Departamento de Derecho Constitucional |
| ispartofjournal |
Revista Derecho del Estado |
| source |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/3812 |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| references |
Okin, Susan Moller. 1994. "Political Liberalism, Justice, and Gender". En Ethics 105: 23-43. Audi, Robert. 1989. "The Separation of Church and State and the Obligations of Citizenship". En Philosophy and Public Affairs 18: 259-296. Branch, Taylor. 1997. Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years, 1963-65. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster. Eberle, Christopher. J. 2002. Religious Conviction in Liberal Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Freeman, Samuel. 2003. "Congruence and the Good of Justice". En The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. S. Freeman, ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Gutmann, Amy y Dennis Thompson, eds. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. London: Harvard University Press. Larmore, Charles. 2003. "Public Reason". En The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. S. Freeman, ed., 368-393. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2000. Women and Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2003. "Rawls and Feminism". En The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. S. Freeman, ed., 488-520. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2004. Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2011. "Perfectionist Liberalism and Political Liberalism". En Philosophy and Public Affairs. 39: 3-45. Okin, Susan Moller. 2004. "Justice and Gender: An Unfinished Debate". En Fordham Law Review 72: 1537-1567. Quinn, Philipp. 1997. "Political Liberalisms and their Exclusions of the Religious". En Religion and Contemporary Liberalism. P. Weithman, ed., 138-161. Notre Dame, IL: University of Notre Dame Press. Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1997. "Why We Should Reject What Liberalism Tells Us about Speaking and Acting in Public for Religious Reasons". En Religion and Contemporary Liberalism. P. Weithman, ed., 162-181. Notre Dame, IL: University of Notre Dame Press. Weithman, Paul. 2002. Religion and the Obligation of Citizenship. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Weithman, Paul. 1999. "Citizenship and Public Reason". En Natural Law and Public Reason. R. P. George y C. Wolfe, eds., 125-170. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. Rawls, John. 1999. "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited". En John Rawls, The Law of Peoples, 129-180. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press. (1a ed. 1997.) Rawls, John. 1996. Political Liberalism. Ed. Ampliada. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (1a ed. 1993.) Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2014-07-23 |
| date_accessioned |
2014-07-23T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2014-07-23T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/3812 |
| url_doi |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/3812 |
| issn |
0122-9893 |
| eissn |
2346-2051 |
| citationstartpage |
5 |
| citationendpage |
33 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/3812/4005 |
| url3_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/3812/4050 |
| _version_ |
1797158055299776512 |