La ortodoxia económica desalienta el estudio del comportamiento colectivo

El pensamiento económico se centró en el comportamiento individual como base de toda actividad económica. Algunos economistas heterodoxos muestran la importancia del comportamiento del grupo y la influencia de las organizaciones en la actividad económica, pero el paradigma neoclásico es la corriente dominante. Este artículo presenta una “sociología de la economía” para explicar por qué la cultura imperante impide ver y estudiar el comportamiento de grupo. Recurriendo a la obra de Pierre Bourdieu, examina el habitus, el sistema de creencias y la violencia simbólica contra quienes los cuestionan. Y resalta el apoyo de los intereses comerciales y financieros a esta cultura dominante.

Guardado en:

0124-5996

2346-2450

17

2015-07-01

13

37

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

id aa632834f5b88a589207bacc357ece28
record_format ojs
spelling La ortodoxia económica desalienta el estudio del comportamiento colectivo
Langlois, R. "Orders and organizations: Toward an Austrian theory of social institutions", B. Caldwell y S. Bohm, eds., Austrian economics: Tensions and new directions, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.
Ostrom, E. "A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems", Science 325, 5939, 2009, pp. 419-422.
Ostrom, E. Understanding institutional diversity, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2005.
North, D. C. Understanding the process of economic change, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2005.
Muth, J. F. "Rational expectations and the theory of price movements", Econometrica 29, 1961, pp. 315-335.
Medin, D. y M. Bazerman. "Broadening behavioral decision research: Multiple levels of cognitive processing", Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 6, 4, 1999, pp. 533-47.
Marshall, A. Principles of economics [1920], 8th ed., Londres, MacMillan, 1959.
Lucas, R. E. "Expectations and the neutrality of money", Journal of Economic Theory 4, 1, 1972, pp. 103-124.
Leboeuf, R. A. "Alternating selves and conflicting choices: Identity salience and preference inconsistency", Dissertation Abstracts International 63(2-B), 2002, p. 1088.
Langlois, R. "Coherence and flexibility: Social institutions in a world of radical uncertainty", I. Kirzer, ed., Subjectivism, intelligibility, and economic understanding: Essays in honor of the eightieth birthday of Ludwig Lachmann, Nueva York, New York University Press, 1986, pp. 171-191.
Samuelson, P. Economics, Nueva York, McGraw-Hill, 1948.
Kuhn, T. The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1962.
Keynes, J. M. The general theory of employment, interest, and money [1936], Nueva York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1964.
Jensen, M. y W. Meckling. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure", Journal of Financial Economics 3, 4, 1976, pp. 305-360.
Himmelweit, S. "The discovery of 'unpaid work': The social consequences of the expansion of work", Feminist Economics 1, 2, 1995, pp. 1-19.
Hicks, J. R. "Mr. Keynes and the classics", Econometrica 5, 2, 1937, pp. 147-159.
Harvey, D. A brief history of Neoliberalism, Nueva York, Oxford University Press, 2005.
Friedman, M. "The case for flexible exchange rates", M. Friedman,ed., Essays on positive economics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1953, pp. 157-203.
Frederick, S. "Cognitive reflection and decision-making", Journal of Economic Perspectives 19, 4, 2005, pp. 25-42.
Folbre, N. "Measuring care: Gender, empowerment, and the care economy", Journal of Human Development 7, 2, 2006, pp. 183-199.
Palley, T. Plenty of nothing: The downsizing of the American dream and the case for structural Keynesianism, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1998.
Seabright, P. The company of strangers: A natural history of economic life, 2nd ed., Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2010.
Debreu, G. Theory of value, New Haven, CN, Yale University Press, 1959.
Williamson, O. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and anti-trust implications, Nueva York, Free Press, 1975.
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Williamson, O. "The theory of the firm as governance structure: From choice to contract", Journal of Economic Perspectives 16, 3, 2002, pp. 171-195.
Weehuizen, R. "Interdisciplinary and problem-based learning in economics education: The case of infonomics", J. Groenewegen, ed., Teaching pluralism in economics, Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, 2007, pp. 155-188.
Simon, H. "A behavioral model of rational choice", Quarterly Journal of Economics 69, 1955, pp. 99-118.
Weber, M. Economy and society, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1978.
Waring, M. If women counted: A new feminist economics, San Francisco, Harper & Row, 1988.
Walras, L. Eléments d'économie politique pure, ou théorie de la richesse sociale, 1874.
Wacquant, L. Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity, Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 2009.
Wacquant, L. "Toward a reflexive sociology: A workshop with Pierre Bourdieu", Sociological Theory 7, 1, 1989, pp. 26-63.
Unesco. "Universal declaration of cultural diversity", 2002, [http://www.unesco.org].
Tarshis, L. The elements of economics, Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1947.
Smith, A. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations [1776], Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1976.
Simon, H. "Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science", American Economic Review 49, 1959, pp. 253-283.
Folbre, N. "Children as public goods", American Economic Review 84,2, 1994, pp. 86-90.
Fama, E. "Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work", Journal of Finance 25, 3, 1970, pp. 383-417.
Colander, D. y H. Landreth. The coming of Keynesianism to America, Brookfield, Vermont, Edward Elgar, 1996.
32
Revista de Economía Institucional
Universidad Externado de Colombia
text/html
application/pdf
Artículo de revista
Núm. 32 , Año 2015 : Enero-Junio
17
Español
sociología
pluralismo
ortodoxia
economía neoclásica
cultura
van den Berg, Hendrik
El pensamiento económico se centró en el comportamiento individual como base de toda actividad económica. Algunos economistas heterodoxos muestran la importancia del comportamiento del grupo y la influencia de las organizaciones en la actividad económica, pero el paradigma neoclásico es la corriente dominante. Este artículo presenta una “sociología de la economía” para explicar por qué la cultura imperante impide ver y estudiar el comportamiento de grupo. Recurriendo a la obra de Pierre Bourdieu, examina el habitus, el sistema de creencias y la violencia simbólica contra quienes los cuestionan. Y resalta el apoyo de los intereses comerciales y financieros a esta cultura dominante.
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/4072
Publication
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Bourdieu, P. Homo academicus, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1988.
Coase, R. "The problem of social costs", Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1, 1960, pp. 1-44.
Churchland, P.S. "Self-representation in nervous systems", Science 296, 5566, 2002, pp. 308-310.
Bourdieu, P. y L. Wacquant. An invitation to reflexive sociology, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Bourdieu, P. The social structures of the economy, Cambridge, U.K., Polity Press, 2005b.
Bourdieu, P. Science of science and reflexivity, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2005a.
Bourdieu, P. Masculine domination, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2001.
Bourdieu, P. In other words: Essays toward a reflexive sociology, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1990.
Bourdieu, P. "Social space and symbolic power", Sociological Theory 7, 1, 1989b, pp. 14-25.
Bourdieu, P. La noblesse d'Etat: grands corps et grands écoles, París, Editions de Minuit, 1989a.
Bourdieu, P. "The forms of capital", J. G. Richardson, ed., Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, Nueva York, Greenwood Press, 1986.
Benerfa, L. "Accounting for women's work: The progress of two decades", World Development 20, 11, 1992, pp. 1547-1460.
Arrow, K. y G. Debreu. "Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy", Econometrica 22, 1954, pp. 265-290.
Bourdieu, P. "Symbolic power", D. Gleeson, ed., Identity and structure, Driffield, Nafferton Books, 1977b.
Bourdieu, P. Outline of a theory of practice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1977a.
Journal article
Economic thought evolved over the past two centuries to focus on individual behavior as the basis for all economic activity. Some heterodox economists have pointed to the importance of group behavior and the influence of organizations on economic activity, but the neoclassical paradigm, with the rational isolated individual as its main actor, prevails in mainstream economics. This paper presents a “sociology of economics” to explain why the prevailing paradigm of economics does not allow seeing and studying group behavior. Drawing on the work of Pierre Bourdieu, the paper details the habitus, the system of beliefs and the symbolic violence against those who question them. Also, it highlights the support of commercial and financial interests to the dominant culture.
Economic orthodoxy discourages the study of collective behavior
https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v17n32.01
10.18601/01245996.v17n32.01
37
2015-07-01T00:00:00Z
0124-5996
2015-07-01T00:00:00Z
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/4072/4782
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/4072/4441
2015-07-01
13
2346-2450
institution UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista de Economía Institucional
title La ortodoxia económica desalienta el estudio del comportamiento colectivo
spellingShingle La ortodoxia económica desalienta el estudio del comportamiento colectivo
van den Berg, Hendrik
sociología
pluralismo
ortodoxia
economía neoclásica
cultura
title_short La ortodoxia económica desalienta el estudio del comportamiento colectivo
title_full La ortodoxia económica desalienta el estudio del comportamiento colectivo
title_fullStr La ortodoxia económica desalienta el estudio del comportamiento colectivo
title_full_unstemmed La ortodoxia económica desalienta el estudio del comportamiento colectivo
title_sort la ortodoxia económica desalienta el estudio del comportamiento colectivo
title_eng Economic orthodoxy discourages the study of collective behavior
description El pensamiento económico se centró en el comportamiento individual como base de toda actividad económica. Algunos economistas heterodoxos muestran la importancia del comportamiento del grupo y la influencia de las organizaciones en la actividad económica, pero el paradigma neoclásico es la corriente dominante. Este artículo presenta una “sociología de la economía” para explicar por qué la cultura imperante impide ver y estudiar el comportamiento de grupo. Recurriendo a la obra de Pierre Bourdieu, examina el habitus, el sistema de creencias y la violencia simbólica contra quienes los cuestionan. Y resalta el apoyo de los intereses comerciales y financieros a esta cultura dominante.
description_eng Economic thought evolved over the past two centuries to focus on individual behavior as the basis for all economic activity. Some heterodox economists have pointed to the importance of group behavior and the influence of organizations on economic activity, but the neoclassical paradigm, with the rational isolated individual as its main actor, prevails in mainstream economics. This paper presents a “sociology of economics” to explain why the prevailing paradigm of economics does not allow seeing and studying group behavior. Drawing on the work of Pierre Bourdieu, the paper details the habitus, the system of beliefs and the symbolic violence against those who question them. Also, it highlights the support of commercial and financial interests to the dominant culture.
author van den Berg, Hendrik
author_facet van den Berg, Hendrik
topicspa_str_mv sociología
pluralismo
ortodoxia
economía neoclásica
cultura
topic sociología
pluralismo
ortodoxia
economía neoclásica
cultura
topic_facet sociología
pluralismo
ortodoxia
economía neoclásica
cultura
citationvolume 17
citationissue 32
citationedition Núm. 32 , Año 2015 : Enero-Junio
publisher Universidad Externado de Colombia
ispartofjournal Revista de Economía Institucional
source https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/4072
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
references Langlois, R. "Orders and organizations: Toward an Austrian theory of social institutions", B. Caldwell y S. Bohm, eds., Austrian economics: Tensions and new directions, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.
Ostrom, E. "A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems", Science 325, 5939, 2009, pp. 419-422.
Ostrom, E. Understanding institutional diversity, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2005.
North, D. C. Understanding the process of economic change, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2005.
Muth, J. F. "Rational expectations and the theory of price movements", Econometrica 29, 1961, pp. 315-335.
Medin, D. y M. Bazerman. "Broadening behavioral decision research: Multiple levels of cognitive processing", Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 6, 4, 1999, pp. 533-47.
Marshall, A. Principles of economics [1920], 8th ed., Londres, MacMillan, 1959.
Lucas, R. E. "Expectations and the neutrality of money", Journal of Economic Theory 4, 1, 1972, pp. 103-124.
Leboeuf, R. A. "Alternating selves and conflicting choices: Identity salience and preference inconsistency", Dissertation Abstracts International 63(2-B), 2002, p. 1088.
Langlois, R. "Coherence and flexibility: Social institutions in a world of radical uncertainty", I. Kirzer, ed., Subjectivism, intelligibility, and economic understanding: Essays in honor of the eightieth birthday of Ludwig Lachmann, Nueva York, New York University Press, 1986, pp. 171-191.
Samuelson, P. Economics, Nueva York, McGraw-Hill, 1948.
Kuhn, T. The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1962.
Keynes, J. M. The general theory of employment, interest, and money [1936], Nueva York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1964.
Jensen, M. y W. Meckling. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure", Journal of Financial Economics 3, 4, 1976, pp. 305-360.
Himmelweit, S. "The discovery of 'unpaid work': The social consequences of the expansion of work", Feminist Economics 1, 2, 1995, pp. 1-19.
Hicks, J. R. "Mr. Keynes and the classics", Econometrica 5, 2, 1937, pp. 147-159.
Harvey, D. A brief history of Neoliberalism, Nueva York, Oxford University Press, 2005.
Friedman, M. "The case for flexible exchange rates", M. Friedman,ed., Essays on positive economics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1953, pp. 157-203.
Frederick, S. "Cognitive reflection and decision-making", Journal of Economic Perspectives 19, 4, 2005, pp. 25-42.
Folbre, N. "Measuring care: Gender, empowerment, and the care economy", Journal of Human Development 7, 2, 2006, pp. 183-199.
Palley, T. Plenty of nothing: The downsizing of the American dream and the case for structural Keynesianism, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1998.
Seabright, P. The company of strangers: A natural history of economic life, 2nd ed., Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2010.
Debreu, G. Theory of value, New Haven, CN, Yale University Press, 1959.
Williamson, O. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and anti-trust implications, Nueva York, Free Press, 1975.
Williamson, O. "The theory of the firm as governance structure: From choice to contract", Journal of Economic Perspectives 16, 3, 2002, pp. 171-195.
Weehuizen, R. "Interdisciplinary and problem-based learning in economics education: The case of infonomics", J. Groenewegen, ed., Teaching pluralism in economics, Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, 2007, pp. 155-188.
Simon, H. "A behavioral model of rational choice", Quarterly Journal of Economics 69, 1955, pp. 99-118.
Weber, M. Economy and society, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1978.
Waring, M. If women counted: A new feminist economics, San Francisco, Harper & Row, 1988.
Walras, L. Eléments d'économie politique pure, ou théorie de la richesse sociale, 1874.
Wacquant, L. Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity, Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 2009.
Wacquant, L. "Toward a reflexive sociology: A workshop with Pierre Bourdieu", Sociological Theory 7, 1, 1989, pp. 26-63.
Unesco. "Universal declaration of cultural diversity", 2002, [http://www.unesco.org].
Tarshis, L. The elements of economics, Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1947.
Smith, A. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations [1776], Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1976.
Simon, H. "Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science", American Economic Review 49, 1959, pp. 253-283.
Folbre, N. "Children as public goods", American Economic Review 84,2, 1994, pp. 86-90.
Fama, E. "Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work", Journal of Finance 25, 3, 1970, pp. 383-417.
Colander, D. y H. Landreth. The coming of Keynesianism to America, Brookfield, Vermont, Edward Elgar, 1996.
Bourdieu, P. Homo academicus, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1988.
Coase, R. "The problem of social costs", Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1, 1960, pp. 1-44.
Churchland, P.S. "Self-representation in nervous systems", Science 296, 5566, 2002, pp. 308-310.
Bourdieu, P. y L. Wacquant. An invitation to reflexive sociology, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Bourdieu, P. The social structures of the economy, Cambridge, U.K., Polity Press, 2005b.
Bourdieu, P. Science of science and reflexivity, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2005a.
Bourdieu, P. Masculine domination, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2001.
Bourdieu, P. In other words: Essays toward a reflexive sociology, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1990.
Bourdieu, P. "Social space and symbolic power", Sociological Theory 7, 1, 1989b, pp. 14-25.
Bourdieu, P. La noblesse d'Etat: grands corps et grands écoles, París, Editions de Minuit, 1989a.
Bourdieu, P. "The forms of capital", J. G. Richardson, ed., Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, Nueva York, Greenwood Press, 1986.
Benerfa, L. "Accounting for women's work: The progress of two decades", World Development 20, 11, 1992, pp. 1547-1460.
Arrow, K. y G. Debreu. "Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy", Econometrica 22, 1954, pp. 265-290.
Bourdieu, P. "Symbolic power", D. Gleeson, ed., Identity and structure, Driffield, Nafferton Books, 1977b.
Bourdieu, P. Outline of a theory of practice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1977a.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2015-07-01
date_accessioned 2015-07-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2015-07-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/4072
url_doi https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v17n32.01
issn 0124-5996
eissn 2346-2450
doi 10.18601/01245996.v17n32.01
citationstartpage 13
citationendpage 37
url3_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/4072/4782
url2_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/4072/4441
_version_ 1797158264377442304