Mujeres en la sala de juntas y desempeño empresarial: una visión de las empresas de Indonesia

El propósito de esta investigación es determinar el impacto de las mujeres consejeras que pertenecen a la junta directiva en el desempeño de la empresa. Este estudio empleó una técnica de muestreo intencional con una muestra de investigación compuesta por 264 empresas no financieras que cotizan en la Bolsa de Valores de Indonesia entre 2013 y 2019. Como sustitutos de la variable independiente de mujeres en las salas de juntas, este estudio examina la presencia de directoras, una variable ficticia para directoras ejecutivas, la proporción de directoras y la capacidad empresarial de las directoras. El rendimiento de los activos (ROA), el rendimiento del capital (ROE) y la Q de Tobin son indicadores para medir el desempeño corporativo. La técn... Ver más

Guardado en:

2248-6046

2011-7663

16

2024-01-31

47

63

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Gatot Nazir Ahmad - 2023

id a8bdf7df3efd1ecbe48fbfcdbeb1786f
record_format ojs
spelling Mujeres en la sala de juntas y desempeño empresarial: una visión de las empresas de Indonesia
Sala de juntas
Revista Finanzas y Política Económica
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Artículo de revista
1
regresión robusta
diversidad de género
directora
experiencia empresarial
16
Siregar , Edo
Sebayang, Dianta A.
Iranto , Dicky
Ahmad, Gatot Nazir
El propósito de esta investigación es determinar el impacto de las mujeres consejeras que pertenecen a la junta directiva en el desempeño de la empresa. Este estudio empleó una técnica de muestreo intencional con una muestra de investigación compuesta por 264 empresas no financieras que cotizan en la Bolsa de Valores de Indonesia entre 2013 y 2019. Como sustitutos de la variable independiente de mujeres en las salas de juntas, este estudio examina la presencia de directoras, una variable ficticia para directoras ejecutivas, la proporción de directoras y la capacidad empresarial de las directoras. El rendimiento de los activos (ROA), el rendimiento del capital (ROE) y la Q de Tobin son indicadores para medir el desempeño corporativo. La técnica de análisis de este estudio es el análisis de regresión robusta. Según los resultados, las mujeres miembros de las juntas directivas tuvieron la mayor influencia en el desempeño de la empresa. En general, la variable ficticia de la directora ejecutiva sirve como indicador de la solidez del desempeño de la empresa.
Kim, D., & Starks, L. T. (2016). Gender diversity on corporate boards: Do women contribute unique skills? American Economic Reviews, 106(5), 267-271. http://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161032
Magrelli, V., Rondi, E., De Massis, A., & Kotlar, J. (2020). Generational brokerage: An intersubjective perspective on managing temporal orientations in family firm succession. Strategic Organization, 20(1), 164-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020976972
Reino, A., Roigas, K., & Müürsepp, M. (2020). Connections between organizational culture and financial performance in Estonian service and production companies. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(3), 375-393. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-01-2019-0017
Porcena, Y.-R., Parboteeah, K. P., & Mero, N. P. (2021). Diversity and firm performance: Role of corporate ethics. Management Decision, 59(11), 2620-2644. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2019-0142
Pandey, N., Andres, C., & Kumar, S. (2023). Mapping the corporate governance scholarship: Current state and future directions. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(1), 127-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12444
Mohsen Al-Absy, M.S. (2023). Impactful women directors and earnings management. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2148873
Mishra, A., & Müller, C. L. (2022). Robust regression with compositional covariates. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 165, 107315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2021.107315
Martínez-Alonso, R., Martínez-Romero, M. J., & Rojo-Ramírez A. A. (2020). Refining the influence of family involvement in management on firm performance: The mediating role of technological innovation efficiency. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 25(4), 337-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420957330
Issa, A., & Zaid, M. A. A. (2023). Firm's biodiversity initiatives disclosure and board gender diversity: A multi-country analysis of corporations operating in Europe. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32((7), 4991-5007. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3404
Lee, H. W., Choi, J. N., & Kim, S. (2018). Does gender diversity help teams constructively manage status conflict? An evolutionary perspective of status conflict, team psychological safety, and team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144, 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.09.005
Love, I., Nikolaev, B. & Dhakal, C. (2023). The well-being of women entrepreneurs: the role of gender inequality and gender roles. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00769-z
Lee, S., Jeon, S., & Lee, B. (2019). Security controls for employees’ satisfaction: Perspective of controls framework. SAGE Open, 9(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019853908
Kong, G., Kong, T.D., Qin, N., & Yu, L. (2022). Ethnic diversity, trust, and corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of marketization and language. Journal of Business Ethics, 187, 449-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05236-5
Lassoued, N., & Khanchel, I. (2023). Voluntary CSR disclosure and CEO narcissism: The moderating role of CEO duality and board gender diversity. Review of Managerial Science, 17, 1075-1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00555-3
Knyazeva, A., Knyazeva, D., & Masulis, R.W. (2013). The supply of corporate directors and board independence. Review of Financial Studies, 26(6), 1561-1605. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hht020
Safiullah, Md., Akhter, T., Saona, P., Azad, Md.A.K. (2022). Gender diversity on corporate boards, firm performance, and risk-taking: New evidence from Spain. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 35, 100721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100721
Issa, A., Zaid, M. A. A., & Hanaysha, J. R. (2022). Exploring the relationship between female director's profile and sustainability performance: Evidence from the Middle East. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(6), 1980-2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3503
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818789
Kauff, M., Asbrock, F., & Schmid, K. (2020). Pro-diversity beliefs and intergroup relations. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(2), 269-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1853377
Roque, A., Moreira, J. M., Dias Figueiredo, J., Albuquerque, R., & Gonçalves, H. (2020). Ethics beyond leadership: can ethics survive bad leadership? Journal of Global Responsibility, 11(3), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-06-2019-0065
Wang, S., & Lv, J. (2023). CEO-TMT faultline and corporate green innovation: The contextual role of Confucian culture. Managerial and Decision Economics, 44(8), 4422-4438. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3959
Sanchez-Marin, G., Lozano-Reina, G., Baixauli-Soler, J. S., & Lucas-Perez, M.E. (2017). Say on pay effectiveness, corporate governance mechanisms, and CEO compensation alignment. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 20(4), 226-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2017.07.001
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Zirgulis, A., Huettinger, & M. Misiunas, D. (2021). No woman, no aggressive tax planning? A study on CEO gender and effective tax rates in the Lithuanian retail sector. Review of Behavioral Finance, 14(3), 394 - 409. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-09-2020-0232
Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., & Maestripieri, D. (2009). Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(36), 15268-15273. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907352106
Yan, X., Wang, X., & Sheng Liu. (2023). A U-shaped relationship between real financialization and financial risk: Evidence from a single threshold model. Finance Research Letters, 56, 104017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104017
Xie, L., Zhou, J., Zong, Q., & Lu, Q. (2020). Gender diversity in R&D teams and innovation efficiency: Role of the innovation context. Research Policy, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103885
Islam, R., French, E., & Ali, M. (2022). Evaluating board diversity and its importance in the environmental and social performance of organizations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1134-1145. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2259
Valenti, A., & Horner, S. (2020). The human capital of boards of directors and innovation: An empirical examination of the pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(06). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919620500565
Tran, H., & Turkiela, J. (2020). The powers that be: Concentration of authority within the board of directors and variability in firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 60, 101537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101537
Teodosio, J., Vieira, E., & Madaleno, M. (2021). Gender diversity and corporate risk-taking: A literature review. Managerial Finance, 47(7) 1038-1073. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-11-2019-0555
Song, H. J., Yoon, Y. N., & Kang, K. H. (2020). The relationship between board diversity and firm performance in the lodging industry: The moderating role of internationalization. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86, 102461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102461
Solomon, S. J., Bendickson, J. S., Marvel, M. R., McDowell, W. C., & Mahto, R. (2021). Agency theory and entrepreneurship: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Business Research, 122, 466-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.003
Issa, A., & Bensalem, N. (2023). Are gender-diverse boards eco-innovative? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(2), 742-754. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2385
Gordini, N., & Rancati, E. (2017). Gender diversity in the Italian boardroom and firm financial performance. Management Research Review, 40(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2016-0039
Hoang, T., Suh, J., & Sabharwal, M. (2022). Beyond a numbers game? Impact of diversity and inclusion on the perception of organizational justice. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 537-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13463
Abebe, M. A., Li, P., Acharya, K., & Daspit, J. J. (2020). The founder chief executive officer: A review of current insights and directions for future research. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28(6), 406-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12348
The purpose of this research is to determine the impact of female board members on firm performance. This study employed a purposive sampling technique with a research sample comprised of 264 non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange between 2013 and 2019. As proxies for the independent variable of females in the boardroom, this study examines female directors' presence, a dummy variable for female CEOs, the proportion of female directors, and female directors' business ability. The return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and Tobin's Q are all proxies for gauging corporate performance. This study's analysis technique is robust regression analysis. Female board members had the greatest influence on firm performance, according to the findings. Overall, the female CEO dummy serves as a proxy for the strength of the company's performance.
Boardroom
business expertise
female director
gender diversity
robust regression
Journal article
text/html
application/pdf
https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4955
Inglés
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Hatane, S. E., Supangat, S., Tarigan, J., & Jie, F. (2019). Does internal corporate governance mechanism control firm risk? Evidence from Indonesia’s three high-risk sectors. Corporate Governance, 19(6), 1362-1376. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2019-0071
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Gatot Nazir Ahmad - 2023
Abdullah, H. O., & AL-Abrrow, H. (2023). Predicting positive and negative behaviors at the workplace: Insights from multi-faceted perceptions and attitudes. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 42(4), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22179
Cordeiro, J. J., Profumo, G., & Tutore, I. (2020). Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of family and dual‐class majority ownership structures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1127-1144. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2421
Gyapong, E., Ahmed, A., Ntim, C. G. & Nadeem M. (2019). Board gender diversity and dividend policy in australian listed firms: The effect of ownership concentration. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(2), 603-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09672-2
Greiner, M., Kim, J., & Thor, J.C. (2023). Narcissistic CEOs and their corporate political activity. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113930
Greene, D., Intintoli, V. J., & Kahle, K. M. (2020). Do board gender quotas affect firm value? Evidence from California senate bill no. 826. Journal of Corporate Finance, 60, 101526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101526
Gould, J. A., Kulik, C. T., & Sardeshmukh, S. R. (2018). Trickle-down effect: the impact of female board members on executive gender diversity. Human Resources Management, 57(4), 931-945. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21907
Female in The Boardroom and Firm Performance: An Insight of Indonesia’s Firms
Eide, A. E., Saether, E. A., & Aspelund, A. (2020). An investigation of leaders’ motivation, intellectual leadership, and sustainability strategy in relation to Norwegian manufacturers’ performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120053, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120053
Doan, T., & Iskandar-Datta, M. (2020). Are female top executives more risk-averse or more ethical? Evidence from corporate cash holdings policy. Journal of Empirical Finance, 55, 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.11.005
Ali Gull, A., Hussain, N., Akbar Khan, S., Nadeem, M. & Mansour Zalata, A. (2023). Walking the talk? A corporate governance perspective on corporate social responsibility decoupling. British Journal of Management, 34(4), 2186-2211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12695
Cornelissen, J. P., Akemu, O., Jonkman, J. G. F., & Werner, M. D. (2021). Building character: The formation of a hybrid organizational identity in a social enterprise. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1294-1330. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12640
Publication
Bhat, K. U., Chen, Y., Jebran, K., & Memon, Z. A. (2019). Board diversity and corporate risk: Evidence from China. Corporate Governance, 20(2), 280-293. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2019-0001
Cambrea, D. R., Paolone, F., & Cucari, N. (2023). Advisory or monitoring role in ESG scenario: Which women directors are more influential in the Italian context? Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4299-4314. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3366
Alkebsee, R. H., Habib, A., Huang, H. J., & Tian, G. (2022). The gender-diverse audit committee and audit report lag: Evidence from China. International Journal of Auditing, 26(2), 314-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12278
Baranchuk, N., & Dybvig, P. (2009). Consensus in diverse corporate boards. Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 715-747. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn052
Bezemer, P.-J., Pugliese, A., Nicholson, G., & Zattoni, A. (2023). Toward a synthesis of the board-strategy relationship: A literature review and future research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(1), 178-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12481
63
47
2011-7663
https://doi.org/10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v16.n1.2024.3
2248-6046
2024-01-31T00:00:00Z
https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4955/4973
https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4955/5040
2024-01-31
10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v16.n1.2024.3
2024-01-31T00:00:00Z
institution UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADCATOLICADECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista Finanzas y Política Económica
title Mujeres en la sala de juntas y desempeño empresarial: una visión de las empresas de Indonesia
spellingShingle Mujeres en la sala de juntas y desempeño empresarial: una visión de las empresas de Indonesia
Siregar , Edo
Sebayang, Dianta A.
Iranto , Dicky
Ahmad, Gatot Nazir
Sala de juntas
regresión robusta
diversidad de género
directora
experiencia empresarial
Boardroom
business expertise
female director
gender diversity
robust regression
title_short Mujeres en la sala de juntas y desempeño empresarial: una visión de las empresas de Indonesia
title_full Mujeres en la sala de juntas y desempeño empresarial: una visión de las empresas de Indonesia
title_fullStr Mujeres en la sala de juntas y desempeño empresarial: una visión de las empresas de Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Mujeres en la sala de juntas y desempeño empresarial: una visión de las empresas de Indonesia
title_sort mujeres en la sala de juntas y desempeño empresarial: una visión de las empresas de indonesia
title_eng Female in The Boardroom and Firm Performance: An Insight of Indonesia’s Firms
description El propósito de esta investigación es determinar el impacto de las mujeres consejeras que pertenecen a la junta directiva en el desempeño de la empresa. Este estudio empleó una técnica de muestreo intencional con una muestra de investigación compuesta por 264 empresas no financieras que cotizan en la Bolsa de Valores de Indonesia entre 2013 y 2019. Como sustitutos de la variable independiente de mujeres en las salas de juntas, este estudio examina la presencia de directoras, una variable ficticia para directoras ejecutivas, la proporción de directoras y la capacidad empresarial de las directoras. El rendimiento de los activos (ROA), el rendimiento del capital (ROE) y la Q de Tobin son indicadores para medir el desempeño corporativo. La técnica de análisis de este estudio es el análisis de regresión robusta. Según los resultados, las mujeres miembros de las juntas directivas tuvieron la mayor influencia en el desempeño de la empresa. En general, la variable ficticia de la directora ejecutiva sirve como indicador de la solidez del desempeño de la empresa.
description_eng The purpose of this research is to determine the impact of female board members on firm performance. This study employed a purposive sampling technique with a research sample comprised of 264 non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange between 2013 and 2019. As proxies for the independent variable of females in the boardroom, this study examines female directors' presence, a dummy variable for female CEOs, the proportion of female directors, and female directors' business ability. The return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and Tobin's Q are all proxies for gauging corporate performance. This study's analysis technique is robust regression analysis. Female board members had the greatest influence on firm performance, according to the findings. Overall, the female CEO dummy serves as a proxy for the strength of the company's performance.
author Siregar , Edo
Sebayang, Dianta A.
Iranto , Dicky
Ahmad, Gatot Nazir
author_facet Siregar , Edo
Sebayang, Dianta A.
Iranto , Dicky
Ahmad, Gatot Nazir
topicspa_str_mv Sala de juntas
regresión robusta
diversidad de género
directora
experiencia empresarial
topic Sala de juntas
regresión robusta
diversidad de género
directora
experiencia empresarial
Boardroom
business expertise
female director
gender diversity
robust regression
topic_facet Sala de juntas
regresión robusta
diversidad de género
directora
experiencia empresarial
Boardroom
business expertise
female director
gender diversity
robust regression
citationvolume 16
citationissue 1
publisher Universidad Católica de Colombia
ispartofjournal Revista Finanzas y Política Económica
source https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4955
language Inglés
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Gatot Nazir Ahmad - 2023
references_eng Kim, D., & Starks, L. T. (2016). Gender diversity on corporate boards: Do women contribute unique skills? American Economic Reviews, 106(5), 267-271. http://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161032
Magrelli, V., Rondi, E., De Massis, A., & Kotlar, J. (2020). Generational brokerage: An intersubjective perspective on managing temporal orientations in family firm succession. Strategic Organization, 20(1), 164-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020976972
Reino, A., Roigas, K., & Müürsepp, M. (2020). Connections between organizational culture and financial performance in Estonian service and production companies. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(3), 375-393. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-01-2019-0017
Porcena, Y.-R., Parboteeah, K. P., & Mero, N. P. (2021). Diversity and firm performance: Role of corporate ethics. Management Decision, 59(11), 2620-2644. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2019-0142
Pandey, N., Andres, C., & Kumar, S. (2023). Mapping the corporate governance scholarship: Current state and future directions. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(1), 127-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12444
Mohsen Al-Absy, M.S. (2023). Impactful women directors and earnings management. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2148873
Mishra, A., & Müller, C. L. (2022). Robust regression with compositional covariates. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 165, 107315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2021.107315
Martínez-Alonso, R., Martínez-Romero, M. J., & Rojo-Ramírez A. A. (2020). Refining the influence of family involvement in management on firm performance: The mediating role of technological innovation efficiency. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 25(4), 337-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420957330
Issa, A., & Zaid, M. A. A. (2023). Firm's biodiversity initiatives disclosure and board gender diversity: A multi-country analysis of corporations operating in Europe. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32((7), 4991-5007. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3404
Lee, H. W., Choi, J. N., & Kim, S. (2018). Does gender diversity help teams constructively manage status conflict? An evolutionary perspective of status conflict, team psychological safety, and team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144, 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.09.005
Love, I., Nikolaev, B. & Dhakal, C. (2023). The well-being of women entrepreneurs: the role of gender inequality and gender roles. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00769-z
Lee, S., Jeon, S., & Lee, B. (2019). Security controls for employees’ satisfaction: Perspective of controls framework. SAGE Open, 9(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019853908
Kong, G., Kong, T.D., Qin, N., & Yu, L. (2022). Ethnic diversity, trust, and corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of marketization and language. Journal of Business Ethics, 187, 449-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05236-5
Lassoued, N., & Khanchel, I. (2023). Voluntary CSR disclosure and CEO narcissism: The moderating role of CEO duality and board gender diversity. Review of Managerial Science, 17, 1075-1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00555-3
Knyazeva, A., Knyazeva, D., & Masulis, R.W. (2013). The supply of corporate directors and board independence. Review of Financial Studies, 26(6), 1561-1605. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hht020
Safiullah, Md., Akhter, T., Saona, P., Azad, Md.A.K. (2022). Gender diversity on corporate boards, firm performance, and risk-taking: New evidence from Spain. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 35, 100721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100721
Issa, A., Zaid, M. A. A., & Hanaysha, J. R. (2022). Exploring the relationship between female director's profile and sustainability performance: Evidence from the Middle East. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(6), 1980-2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3503
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818789
Kauff, M., Asbrock, F., & Schmid, K. (2020). Pro-diversity beliefs and intergroup relations. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(2), 269-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1853377
Roque, A., Moreira, J. M., Dias Figueiredo, J., Albuquerque, R., & Gonçalves, H. (2020). Ethics beyond leadership: can ethics survive bad leadership? Journal of Global Responsibility, 11(3), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-06-2019-0065
Wang, S., & Lv, J. (2023). CEO-TMT faultline and corporate green innovation: The contextual role of Confucian culture. Managerial and Decision Economics, 44(8), 4422-4438. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3959
Sanchez-Marin, G., Lozano-Reina, G., Baixauli-Soler, J. S., & Lucas-Perez, M.E. (2017). Say on pay effectiveness, corporate governance mechanisms, and CEO compensation alignment. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 20(4), 226-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2017.07.001
Zirgulis, A., Huettinger, & M. Misiunas, D. (2021). No woman, no aggressive tax planning? A study on CEO gender and effective tax rates in the Lithuanian retail sector. Review of Behavioral Finance, 14(3), 394 - 409. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-09-2020-0232
Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., & Maestripieri, D. (2009). Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(36), 15268-15273. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907352106
Yan, X., Wang, X., & Sheng Liu. (2023). A U-shaped relationship between real financialization and financial risk: Evidence from a single threshold model. Finance Research Letters, 56, 104017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104017
Xie, L., Zhou, J., Zong, Q., & Lu, Q. (2020). Gender diversity in R&D teams and innovation efficiency: Role of the innovation context. Research Policy, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103885
Islam, R., French, E., & Ali, M. (2022). Evaluating board diversity and its importance in the environmental and social performance of organizations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1134-1145. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2259
Valenti, A., & Horner, S. (2020). The human capital of boards of directors and innovation: An empirical examination of the pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(06). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919620500565
Tran, H., & Turkiela, J. (2020). The powers that be: Concentration of authority within the board of directors and variability in firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 60, 101537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101537
Teodosio, J., Vieira, E., & Madaleno, M. (2021). Gender diversity and corporate risk-taking: A literature review. Managerial Finance, 47(7) 1038-1073. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-11-2019-0555
Song, H. J., Yoon, Y. N., & Kang, K. H. (2020). The relationship between board diversity and firm performance in the lodging industry: The moderating role of internationalization. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86, 102461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102461
Solomon, S. J., Bendickson, J. S., Marvel, M. R., McDowell, W. C., & Mahto, R. (2021). Agency theory and entrepreneurship: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Business Research, 122, 466-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.003
Issa, A., & Bensalem, N. (2023). Are gender-diverse boards eco-innovative? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(2), 742-754. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2385
Gordini, N., & Rancati, E. (2017). Gender diversity in the Italian boardroom and firm financial performance. Management Research Review, 40(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2016-0039
Hoang, T., Suh, J., & Sabharwal, M. (2022). Beyond a numbers game? Impact of diversity and inclusion on the perception of organizational justice. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 537-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13463
Abebe, M. A., Li, P., Acharya, K., & Daspit, J. J. (2020). The founder chief executive officer: A review of current insights and directions for future research. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28(6), 406-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12348
Hatane, S. E., Supangat, S., Tarigan, J., & Jie, F. (2019). Does internal corporate governance mechanism control firm risk? Evidence from Indonesia’s three high-risk sectors. Corporate Governance, 19(6), 1362-1376. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2019-0071
Abdullah, H. O., & AL-Abrrow, H. (2023). Predicting positive and negative behaviors at the workplace: Insights from multi-faceted perceptions and attitudes. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 42(4), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22179
Cordeiro, J. J., Profumo, G., & Tutore, I. (2020). Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of family and dual‐class majority ownership structures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1127-1144. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2421
Gyapong, E., Ahmed, A., Ntim, C. G. & Nadeem M. (2019). Board gender diversity and dividend policy in australian listed firms: The effect of ownership concentration. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(2), 603-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09672-2
Greiner, M., Kim, J., & Thor, J.C. (2023). Narcissistic CEOs and their corporate political activity. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113930
Greene, D., Intintoli, V. J., & Kahle, K. M. (2020). Do board gender quotas affect firm value? Evidence from California senate bill no. 826. Journal of Corporate Finance, 60, 101526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101526
Gould, J. A., Kulik, C. T., & Sardeshmukh, S. R. (2018). Trickle-down effect: the impact of female board members on executive gender diversity. Human Resources Management, 57(4), 931-945. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21907
Eide, A. E., Saether, E. A., & Aspelund, A. (2020). An investigation of leaders’ motivation, intellectual leadership, and sustainability strategy in relation to Norwegian manufacturers’ performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120053, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120053
Doan, T., & Iskandar-Datta, M. (2020). Are female top executives more risk-averse or more ethical? Evidence from corporate cash holdings policy. Journal of Empirical Finance, 55, 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.11.005
Ali Gull, A., Hussain, N., Akbar Khan, S., Nadeem, M. & Mansour Zalata, A. (2023). Walking the talk? A corporate governance perspective on corporate social responsibility decoupling. British Journal of Management, 34(4), 2186-2211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12695
Cornelissen, J. P., Akemu, O., Jonkman, J. G. F., & Werner, M. D. (2021). Building character: The formation of a hybrid organizational identity in a social enterprise. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1294-1330. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12640
Bhat, K. U., Chen, Y., Jebran, K., & Memon, Z. A. (2019). Board diversity and corporate risk: Evidence from China. Corporate Governance, 20(2), 280-293. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2019-0001
Cambrea, D. R., Paolone, F., & Cucari, N. (2023). Advisory or monitoring role in ESG scenario: Which women directors are more influential in the Italian context? Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4299-4314. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3366
Alkebsee, R. H., Habib, A., Huang, H. J., & Tian, G. (2022). The gender-diverse audit committee and audit report lag: Evidence from China. International Journal of Auditing, 26(2), 314-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12278
Baranchuk, N., & Dybvig, P. (2009). Consensus in diverse corporate boards. Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 715-747. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn052
Bezemer, P.-J., Pugliese, A., Nicholson, G., & Zattoni, A. (2023). Toward a synthesis of the board-strategy relationship: A literature review and future research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(1), 178-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12481
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2024-01-31
date_accessioned 2024-01-31T00:00:00Z
date_available 2024-01-31T00:00:00Z
url https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4955
url_doi https://doi.org/10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v16.n1.2024.3
issn 2248-6046
eissn 2011-7663
doi 10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v16.n1.2024.3
citationstartpage 47
citationendpage 63
url2_str_mv https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4955/4973
url3_str_mv https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4955/5040
_version_ 1798825470787059712