Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo
A partir de las nociones de libertad de proceso y de oportunidad de Amartya Sen, este artículo expone las condiciones necesarias para que el funcionamiento de los mercados tenga resultados compatibles con el concepto de la soberanía del consumidor formulado por Hutt. Estas condiciones están vinculadas al desarrollo de capacidades básicas de los consumidores, la promoción de mercados con opciones plurales y el acceso a mecanismos de justicia de consumo. Examina, además, el papel del Estado en el cumplimiento de esas condiciones en países en desarrollo.
Guardado en:
0124-5996
2346-2450
20
2018-04-04
71
95
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
| id |
a278a4c896e3e7b06e2565db05dcf1a0 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo Islam, S. y Clarke, M. (2001). The relationship between well-being, utility and capacities: A new approach to social welfare measurement based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Melbourne: Victoria University, [http://ged.u-bordeaux4.fr/SAMATTHEW.pdf]. Prabhat, J., Musgrove, Ph., Chaloupka, F. et al. (2000). The economic rationale for intervention in the tobacco market. En P. Jha y F. Chaloupka (eds.), Tobacco control in developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Posner, R. (1974). The social cost of monopoly. NBER working paper 55. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Persky, J. (1993). Retrospective: Consumer sovereignty. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(1), 183-191. OECD et al. (2009). Financial literacy in developing countries: Promoting access to finance by empowering consumers, [https://www.globalbrigades.org/media/Financial_Literacy.pdf]. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarquía, Estado y utopía. Madrid: Fondo de Cultura Económica. Nelson, Ph. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 82(4), 729-754. Nelson, Ph. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311-329. Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396. Kenrick, D., Griskevicius V., Neuberg S. et al. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 292-314. Hutt, W. (1943). Plan for reconstruction. Londres: Kegan Paul & Co. Rawls, J. (1993). El liberalismo político. Nueva York: Columbia University Press. Hutt, W. (1940b). The concept of consumers’ sovereignty. The Economic Journal, 50(197), 66-77. Hutt, W. (1940a). The economist and the public. A study of competition and opinion. Londres: Transaction Publishers. Hayek, F. (1960). The Constitution of liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Hayek, F. (1944). The road to serfdom. Nueva York: Routledge Press. Gunning, P. (2009). Rothbard on consumer sovereignly and his implicit rejection of Mises’s economics. Smithfield: Bryant University, [http://www.sdaeonline.org/wp-content/uploads/doc/Gunning_Rothbard_on_Mises.pdf]. Godfrey, N. (2008). Why is competition important for growth and poverty reduction? Conference Document, OECD Global Forum on International Investment, [http://www.oecd.org/investment/globalforum/40315399.pdf]. Frey, B., Benz, M. y Stuzer, A. (2004). Introducing procedural utility: Not only what, but also what matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160, 377-401. Filho, S. (2015). Monopolies and underdevelopment: From colonial past to global reality. Series New Horizons in Competition Law and Economics. Londres: Edward Elgar Publishing. Feres, J. C. y Mancero, J. (2001). El método de las necesidades básicas insatisfechas y su aplicación en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: Cepal. Engel, E. (1995). Consumer protection policy and rational behavior. Revista de Análisis Económico, 10(2), 183-202. Rawls, J. (1971). Una teoría de la justicia. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Roemer, J. y Tranoy, A. (2013). Equality of oportunity. En A. Atkinson y F. Bourguignon (eds.), Handbook of income distribution, vol 2. Amsterdam: North Holland Cotter, Th. (2010). The essential facilities doctrine. Antitrust law and economics, vol. 4. K. Hylton (ed.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (pp. 157-182). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Williamson, O. (1968). Economies as an antitrust defense: The welfare trade-offs. American Economic Review, 58(1), 18-36. Text http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/article Yamey, B. (1988). Professor Hutt on monopoly policy (1934-1943). Mangerial and Decision Economics, 9(5), 27-31. Wandel, J. (2012). Competition and antitrust policy: An Austrian economics perspective. En G. Leismuller y E. J. Schimpf (eds.), Economics of competition. Nueva York: Nova Science Publishers. Rothenberg, J. (1962). Consumers’ sovereignty and the hospitality of freedom of choice. The American Economic Review, 52(2), 269-283. Waldfogel, J. (2005). Does consumer irrationality trump consumer sovereignty? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(4), 691-696. Wahba, M. y Bridwell, L. (1976). Maslow reconsidered: A review of research on the need hierarchy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15, 212-240. Witzke von, H., Kirschke, D., Lotze-C., H. et al. (2005). The economics of consumer protection in developing countries’ food economy: The case of diarrhea prevention and treatment in Rwanda. Agrarwirtschaft, 54, 314-319. Von Mises, L. (1949). Human action. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, [https://mises.org/sites/default/files/Human%20Action_3.pdf]. Thomas, M. y Buckmaster, L. (2010). Paternalism in social policy when is it justifiable? Research paper 8, Social Policy Section, Parliament of Australia. Smith, A. y Todd, Z. (2014). Behavior, paternalism, and policy, evaluating consumer financial protection. Journal of Law and Liberty, Working paper, 14-06, March. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry about the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, [http://www.ibiblio.org/ml/libri/s/SmithA_WealthNations_p.pdf]. Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2),151-166. Sen, A. (1993). Markets and freedoms: Achievements and limitations of the market mechanism in promoting individual freedoms. Oxford Economic Papers, 45(4), 519-541. Saving, J. (2006). Consumer sovereignty in the modern global era. Journal of Private Enterprise, 22(1): 107-119. Darby M. y Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 67. Cseres, J. (2005). Competition policy and consumer protection. Ámsterdam: Kluwer. Cook, Ph. y Moore, M. (2002). The economics of alcohol abuse and alcohol-control policies. Health Affairs, 21(2), 120-133. soberania do consumidor 38 20 L49 livre concorrência regulação liberdade de escolha proteção do consumidor L49 Artículo de revista D18 libre competencia regulación libertad de elección protección al consumidor soberanía del consumidor Ruiz Díaz, Gonzalo A partir de las nociones de libertad de proceso y de oportunidad de Amartya Sen, este artículo expone las condiciones necesarias para que el funcionamiento de los mercados tenga resultados compatibles con el concepto de la soberanía del consumidor formulado por Hutt. Estas condiciones están vinculadas al desarrollo de capacidades básicas de los consumidores, la promoción de mercados con opciones plurales y el acceso a mecanismos de justicia de consumo. Examina, además, el papel del Estado en el cumplimiento de esas condiciones en países en desarrollo. Núm. 38 , Año 2018 : Enero-Junio D18 Publication Universidad Externado de Colombia Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500. Español https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/5273 Revista de Economía Institucional https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ text/html application/pdf application/xml L49 Based on Amartya Sen’s notions of freedom of process and opportunity, this article explain the necessary conditions for the operation of markets to have results compatible with the concept of consumer sovereignty formulated by Hutt. These conditions are linked to the development of the basic capacities of consumers, the promotion of markets with plural options and the access to consumer justice mechanisms. It also examines the role of the State in meeting these conditions in developing countries. consumer sovereignty consumer protection freedom of choice regulation free competition D18 Consumer sovereignty and freedom of choice in developing countries Journal article 71 2018-04-04T00:00:00Z https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5273/6395 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5273/6765 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5273/6951 2018-04-04 https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v20n38.04 10.18601/01245996.v20n38.04 2346-2450 0124-5996 95 2018-04-04T00:00:00Z |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Revista de Economía Institucional |
| title |
Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo |
| spellingShingle |
Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo Ruiz Díaz, Gonzalo soberania do consumidor livre concorrência regulação liberdade de escolha proteção do consumidor libre competencia regulación libertad de elección protección al consumidor soberanía del consumidor consumer sovereignty consumer protection freedom of choice regulation free competition |
| title_short |
Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo |
| title_full |
Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo |
| title_fullStr |
Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo |
| title_sort |
soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo |
| title_eng |
Consumer sovereignty and freedom of choice in developing countries |
| description |
A partir de las nociones de libertad de proceso y de oportunidad de Amartya Sen, este artículo expone las condiciones necesarias para que el funcionamiento de los mercados tenga resultados compatibles con el concepto de la soberanía del consumidor formulado por Hutt. Estas condiciones están vinculadas al desarrollo de capacidades básicas de los consumidores, la promoción de mercados con opciones plurales y el acceso a mecanismos de justicia de consumo. Examina, además, el papel del Estado en el cumplimiento de esas condiciones en países en desarrollo.
|
| description_eng |
Based on Amartya Sen’s notions of freedom of process and opportunity, this article explain the necessary conditions for the operation of markets to have results compatible with the concept of consumer sovereignty formulated by Hutt. These conditions are linked to the development of the basic capacities of consumers, the promotion of markets with plural options and the access to consumer justice mechanisms. It also examines the role of the State in meeting these conditions in developing countries.
|
| author |
Ruiz Díaz, Gonzalo |
| author_facet |
Ruiz Díaz, Gonzalo |
| topicspa_str_mv |
soberania do consumidor livre concorrência regulação liberdade de escolha proteção do consumidor libre competencia regulación libertad de elección protección al consumidor soberanía del consumidor |
| topic |
soberania do consumidor livre concorrência regulação liberdade de escolha proteção do consumidor libre competencia regulación libertad de elección protección al consumidor soberanía del consumidor consumer sovereignty consumer protection freedom of choice regulation free competition |
| topic_facet |
soberania do consumidor livre concorrência regulação liberdade de escolha proteção do consumidor libre competencia regulación libertad de elección protección al consumidor soberanía del consumidor consumer sovereignty consumer protection freedom of choice regulation free competition |
| citationvolume |
20 |
| citationissue |
38 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 38 , Año 2018 : Enero-Junio |
| publisher |
Universidad Externado de Colombia |
| ispartofjournal |
Revista de Economía Institucional |
| source |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/5273 |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| references |
Islam, S. y Clarke, M. (2001). The relationship between well-being, utility and capacities: A new approach to social welfare measurement based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Melbourne: Victoria University, [http://ged.u-bordeaux4.fr/SAMATTHEW.pdf]. Prabhat, J., Musgrove, Ph., Chaloupka, F. et al. (2000). The economic rationale for intervention in the tobacco market. En P. Jha y F. Chaloupka (eds.), Tobacco control in developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Posner, R. (1974). The social cost of monopoly. NBER working paper 55. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Persky, J. (1993). Retrospective: Consumer sovereignty. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(1), 183-191. OECD et al. (2009). Financial literacy in developing countries: Promoting access to finance by empowering consumers, [https://www.globalbrigades.org/media/Financial_Literacy.pdf]. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarquía, Estado y utopía. Madrid: Fondo de Cultura Económica. Nelson, Ph. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 82(4), 729-754. Nelson, Ph. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311-329. Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396. Kenrick, D., Griskevicius V., Neuberg S. et al. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 292-314. Hutt, W. (1943). Plan for reconstruction. Londres: Kegan Paul & Co. Rawls, J. (1993). El liberalismo político. Nueva York: Columbia University Press. Hutt, W. (1940b). The concept of consumers’ sovereignty. The Economic Journal, 50(197), 66-77. Hutt, W. (1940a). The economist and the public. A study of competition and opinion. Londres: Transaction Publishers. Hayek, F. (1960). The Constitution of liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Hayek, F. (1944). The road to serfdom. Nueva York: Routledge Press. Gunning, P. (2009). Rothbard on consumer sovereignly and his implicit rejection of Mises’s economics. Smithfield: Bryant University, [http://www.sdaeonline.org/wp-content/uploads/doc/Gunning_Rothbard_on_Mises.pdf]. Godfrey, N. (2008). Why is competition important for growth and poverty reduction? Conference Document, OECD Global Forum on International Investment, [http://www.oecd.org/investment/globalforum/40315399.pdf]. Frey, B., Benz, M. y Stuzer, A. (2004). Introducing procedural utility: Not only what, but also what matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160, 377-401. Filho, S. (2015). Monopolies and underdevelopment: From colonial past to global reality. Series New Horizons in Competition Law and Economics. Londres: Edward Elgar Publishing. Feres, J. C. y Mancero, J. (2001). El método de las necesidades básicas insatisfechas y su aplicación en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: Cepal. Engel, E. (1995). Consumer protection policy and rational behavior. Revista de Análisis Económico, 10(2), 183-202. Rawls, J. (1971). Una teoría de la justicia. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Roemer, J. y Tranoy, A. (2013). Equality of oportunity. En A. Atkinson y F. Bourguignon (eds.), Handbook of income distribution, vol 2. Amsterdam: North Holland Cotter, Th. (2010). The essential facilities doctrine. Antitrust law and economics, vol. 4. K. Hylton (ed.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (pp. 157-182). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Williamson, O. (1968). Economies as an antitrust defense: The welfare trade-offs. American Economic Review, 58(1), 18-36. Yamey, B. (1988). Professor Hutt on monopoly policy (1934-1943). Mangerial and Decision Economics, 9(5), 27-31. Wandel, J. (2012). Competition and antitrust policy: An Austrian economics perspective. En G. Leismuller y E. J. Schimpf (eds.), Economics of competition. Nueva York: Nova Science Publishers. Rothenberg, J. (1962). Consumers’ sovereignty and the hospitality of freedom of choice. The American Economic Review, 52(2), 269-283. Waldfogel, J. (2005). Does consumer irrationality trump consumer sovereignty? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(4), 691-696. Wahba, M. y Bridwell, L. (1976). Maslow reconsidered: A review of research on the need hierarchy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15, 212-240. Witzke von, H., Kirschke, D., Lotze-C., H. et al. (2005). The economics of consumer protection in developing countries’ food economy: The case of diarrhea prevention and treatment in Rwanda. Agrarwirtschaft, 54, 314-319. Von Mises, L. (1949). Human action. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, [https://mises.org/sites/default/files/Human%20Action_3.pdf]. Thomas, M. y Buckmaster, L. (2010). Paternalism in social policy when is it justifiable? Research paper 8, Social Policy Section, Parliament of Australia. Smith, A. y Todd, Z. (2014). Behavior, paternalism, and policy, evaluating consumer financial protection. Journal of Law and Liberty, Working paper, 14-06, March. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry about the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, [http://www.ibiblio.org/ml/libri/s/SmithA_WealthNations_p.pdf]. Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2),151-166. Sen, A. (1993). Markets and freedoms: Achievements and limitations of the market mechanism in promoting individual freedoms. Oxford Economic Papers, 45(4), 519-541. Saving, J. (2006). Consumer sovereignty in the modern global era. Journal of Private Enterprise, 22(1): 107-119. Darby M. y Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 67. Cseres, J. (2005). Competition policy and consumer protection. Ámsterdam: Kluwer. Cook, Ph. y Moore, M. (2002). The economics of alcohol abuse and alcohol-control policies. Health Affairs, 21(2), 120-133. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500. |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2018-04-04 |
| date_accessioned |
2018-04-04T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2018-04-04T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/5273 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v20n38.04 |
| issn |
0124-5996 |
| eissn |
2346-2450 |
| doi |
10.18601/01245996.v20n38.04 |
| citationstartpage |
71 |
| citationendpage |
95 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5273/6395 |
| url4_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5273/6765 |
| url3_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5273/6951 |
| _version_ |
1797158366894620672 |