Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político*
El presente artículo expone dos contribuciones teóricas del institucionalismohistórico a la ciencia política que, a diferencia de losestudios más representativos que ha orientado esta corriente de pensamiento en la disciplina, se centran en el ámbito del análisis político antes que en la reconstrucción de macrodinámicas de cambio institucional.La primera de ellas corresponde al esclarecimiento conceptualde la capacidad que tienen los instrumentos de acción pública para estructurar el contenido sustancial de la política, la incidencia que tienen en la representación de los problemas públicos, y el rol que ejercen sobre la formación y/o transmisión de preferencias. La segunda se refiere a las implicaciones de la dimensión temporal de las polí... Ver más
Guardado en:
2011-5733
8
2015-11-30
155
178
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Criterios - 2016
| id |
926a21eddd434f01792546eff05cbb15 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Criterios |
| title |
Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político* |
| spellingShingle |
Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político* Martínez Coral, Patricia |
| title_short |
Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político* |
| title_full |
Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político* |
| title_fullStr |
Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político* |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político* |
| title_sort |
los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político* |
| title_eng |
Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político* |
| description |
El presente artículo expone dos contribuciones teóricas del institucionalismohistórico a la ciencia política que, a diferencia de losestudios más representativos que ha orientado esta corriente de pensamiento en la disciplina, se centran en el ámbito del análisis político antes que en la reconstrucción de macrodinámicas de cambio institucional.La primera de ellas corresponde al esclarecimiento conceptualde la capacidad que tienen los instrumentos de acción pública para estructurar el contenido sustancial de la política, la incidencia que tienen en la representación de los problemas públicos, y el rol que ejercen sobre la formación y/o transmisión de preferencias. La segunda se refiere a las implicaciones de la dimensión temporal de las políticas, con base en la cual es posible controvertir gran parte de las aproximaciones convencionales de la disciplina en torno a los procesos de aprendizaje.
|
| author |
Martínez Coral, Patricia |
| author_facet |
Martínez Coral, Patricia |
| citationvolume |
8 |
| citationissue |
2 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 2 , Año 2015 : (Julio-Diciembre) |
| publisher |
Universidad San Buenaventura |
| ispartofjournal |
Criterios |
| source |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/criterios/article/view/2207 |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Criterios - 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| references |
Argyris, C. & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. MA: Addison-Wesley. Arthur, B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Arthur, B. (1992). On learning and adaptation in the economy. Queen´s Economics Department, Working Paper N.o 854. Bachrach, P. & Baratz, M. (1962). Two Faces of Power. The American Political Science Review, 56 (4): 947-952. Barrados, M; & Mayne, J. (2003). Can Public Sector Organizations Learn? OECD Journal on Budgeting, 3(3): 87-104. Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R. C., & Vedung, E. O. (2007). Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation. New Jersey: Transaction. Bennett, C. & Howlett, M. (1992). The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25: 275-294. Berends, H; Boersma, K. & Weggeman, M. (2003). The Structuration of Organizational Leaning. Human Relations, 56(9): 1035–56. Blindenbacher, R. (2010). The Black Box of Governmental Learning: the Learning Spiral—a Concept to Organize Learning in Governments. Washington: The World Bank. Bowles, S. (1998). Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and other Economic Institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXVI: 75-111. Capano, G. (2009). Understanding Policy Change as an Epistemological and Theoretical Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11 (1): 7-31. Capoccia, G. & Kelemen, D. (2007). The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics, 59 (3): 341-369. Chapman, J. (2004). System Failure. Why Governments Must Learn to Think Differently. London: Demos. Collier, R & Collier, D. (2002) Shaping the political arena. Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–37. David, P. (2000). Path Dependence, Its Critics and the Quest for ‘Historical Economics’. Working Paper. Department of Economics Stanford University. Grin, J & Loeber, A. (2007). Theories of Policy Learning: Agency, Structure, and Change. In: Handbook of Public Policy Analysis, Theory, Politics, and Methods. Fischer, F; Miller, G & Sidney, M. Eds. London: CRC Press. Pp. 201-2015. Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the State: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. In: Comparative Politics, 25 (3): 275-296. Hall, P. & Taylor, R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Discussion Paper No 96, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung. Hay, C. & Wincott, D. (1998). Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies, 46 (5): 951-957. Hood, C. (2007): Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government after Two Decades. In: Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20 (1): 127–144. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons?. Public Administration, 69: 3-19. Ikenberry, J. (1994). History´s heavy hand. Institutions and the politics of the state. Paper Prepared for a Conference on “New perspectives on institutions” University of Maryland, 1st October 1994. Available: http://scholar.princeton.edu/gji3/files/HistorysHeavyHand.pdf Immergut, E. (1998). The theoretical core of the New Institutionalism. Politics and society, 26 (1): 5-34. Katznelson, I. & Weingast, B. Ed. (2005). Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection Between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Kerr, P. (2002). Saved from Extinction: Evolutionary Theorising, Politics and the State. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4 (2): 330–358. Kim, D. (1993). The Link between Individual and Organizational Learning, Management Review, 15: 37-50. Lascoumes, P. & Le Galès, P. (2007). Understanding Public Policy through Its InstrumentsFrom the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation, Governance, 20 (1). Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. Levinthal, D. & March, J. (1993). The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (Special Issue: Organizations, Decision Making and Strategy): 95-112. Lindblom, Ch. (1959). The Science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review, 19 (2): 79-88. Linder, S. & Peters, G. (1989). Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9 (01): 35-58. Mahoney, J. (2001). Path-Dependent Explanations of Regime Change: Central America in Comparative Perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36 (1): 111–141. Page, S. (2008). Uncertainty, Difficulty, and Complexity. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 20: 115-149. Page, S. (2005). An Essay on The Existence and Causes of Path Dependence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Palier, B. (2007). Tracking the Evolution of a Single Instrument Can Reveal Profound Changes: The Case of Funded Pensions in France. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20 (1): 85–107. Perc, M. (2014). The Matthew effect in empirical data. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11 (98). http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0378 Peters, G. (2000). Institutional Theory: Problems and Prospects. Political Science Series, 69. Vienna: Institute for advanced studies. Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design: explaining institutional origins and change. Governance: An international journal of policy and administration, 13 (4): 475-499. Pierson, P. (1993). When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change, World Politics, 45 (4): 595-628. Pierson, P. & Skocpol, T. (2008). El institucionalismo histórico en la ciencia política contemporánea. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 17 (1): 7-38. Sabatier, P. & Weible, C. (2007). Theories of the Policy Process, Cambridge: Westview Press. Sabatier, P. Ed. pp. 189-222. Salamon, L. (2000). The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action: An Introduction. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 28 (5): 1611-1674. Schulz, M. (2001). Organizational Learning. En: Joel A. C. Baum (ed) Companion to Organizations. Washington: Blackwell. Steinmo, S. (2008). What is Historical Institutionalism?. In: Approaches in the Social Sciences, Donatella Della Porta and Michael Keating (Eds.). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Streeck, W. & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tilly, C. (1995). To Explain Political Processes. American Journal of Sociology, 100 (6): 1594-1610. Walker, W., Rahman, A., Adnan, S & Cave, J. (2001). Adaptive policies, policy analysis and policymaking. European Journal of Operational Research, 128 (20), 282 – 289. Young, P. (1996). The Economics of Convention. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10 (2): 105-122. Zittoun, P. (2011). From Instrument to Policy: Observing the Meaning Process to Make a Decision. Political Science Review, 48 (5): 106-124. |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2015-11-30 |
| date_accessioned |
2015-11-30T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2015-11-30T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/criterios/article/view/2207 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.21500/20115733.2207 |
| issn |
2011-5733 |
| doi |
10.21500/20115733.2207 |
| citationstartpage |
155 |
| citationendpage |
178 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/criterios/article/download/2207/1931 |
| _version_ |
1797160138971283456 |
| spelling |
Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político* https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/criterios/article/view/2207 Text http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/article Argyris, C. & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. MA: Addison-Wesley. Arthur, B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Arthur, B. (1992). On learning and adaptation in the economy. Queen´s Economics Department, Working Paper N.o 854. Bachrach, P. & Baratz, M. (1962). Two Faces of Power. The American Political Science Review, 56 (4): 947-952. Barrados, M; & Mayne, J. (2003). Can Public Sector Organizations Learn? OECD Journal on Budgeting, 3(3): 87-104. Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R. C., & Vedung, E. O. (2007). Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation. New Jersey: Transaction. Bennett, C. & Howlett, M. (1992). The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25: 275-294. Berends, H; Boersma, K. & Weggeman, M. (2003). The Structuration of Organizational Leaning. Human Relations, 56(9): 1035–56. Blindenbacher, R. (2010). The Black Box of Governmental Learning: the Learning Spiral—a Concept to Organize Learning in Governments. Washington: The World Bank. Bowles, S. (1998). Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and other Economic Institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXVI: 75-111. Capano, G. (2009). Understanding Policy Change as an Epistemological and Theoretical Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11 (1): 7-31. Capoccia, G. & Kelemen, D. (2007). The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics, 59 (3): 341-369. Chapman, J. (2004). System Failure. Why Governments Must Learn to Think Differently. London: Demos. Collier, R & Collier, D. (2002) Shaping the political arena. Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–37. David, P. (2000). Path Dependence, Its Critics and the Quest for ‘Historical Economics’. Working Paper. Department of Economics Stanford University. Grin, J & Loeber, A. (2007). Theories of Policy Learning: Agency, Structure, and Change. In: Handbook of Public Policy Analysis, Theory, Politics, and Methods. Fischer, F; Miller, G & Sidney, M. Eds. London: CRC Press. Pp. 201-2015. Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the State: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. In: Comparative Politics, 25 (3): 275-296. Hall, P. & Taylor, R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Discussion Paper No 96, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung. Hay, C. & Wincott, D. (1998). Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies, 46 (5): 951-957. Hood, C. (2007): Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government after Two Decades. In: Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20 (1): 127–144. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons?. Public Administration, 69: 3-19. Ikenberry, J. (1994). History´s heavy hand. Institutions and the politics of the state. Paper Prepared for a Conference on “New perspectives on institutions” University of Maryland, 1st October 1994. Available: http://scholar.princeton.edu/gji3/files/HistorysHeavyHand.pdf Immergut, E. (1998). The theoretical core of the New Institutionalism. Politics and society, 26 (1): 5-34. Katznelson, I. & Weingast, B. Ed. (2005). Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection Between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Kerr, P. (2002). Saved from Extinction: Evolutionary Theorising, Politics and the State. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4 (2): 330–358. Kim, D. (1993). The Link between Individual and Organizational Learning, Management Review, 15: 37-50. Lascoumes, P. & Le Galès, P. (2007). Understanding Public Policy through Its InstrumentsFrom the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation, Governance, 20 (1). Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. Levinthal, D. & March, J. (1993). The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (Special Issue: Organizations, Decision Making and Strategy): 95-112. Lindblom, Ch. (1959). The Science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review, 19 (2): 79-88. Linder, S. & Peters, G. (1989). Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9 (01): 35-58. Mahoney, J. (2001). Path-Dependent Explanations of Regime Change: Central America in Comparative Perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36 (1): 111–141. Page, S. (2008). Uncertainty, Difficulty, and Complexity. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 20: 115-149. Page, S. (2005). An Essay on The Existence and Causes of Path Dependence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Palier, B. (2007). Tracking the Evolution of a Single Instrument Can Reveal Profound Changes: The Case of Funded Pensions in France. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20 (1): 85–107. Perc, M. (2014). The Matthew effect in empirical data. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11 (98). http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0378 Peters, G. (2000). Institutional Theory: Problems and Prospects. Political Science Series, 69. Vienna: Institute for advanced studies. Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design: explaining institutional origins and change. Governance: An international journal of policy and administration, 13 (4): 475-499. Pierson, P. (1993). When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change, World Politics, 45 (4): 595-628. Pierson, P. & Skocpol, T. (2008). El institucionalismo histórico en la ciencia política contemporánea. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 17 (1): 7-38. Sabatier, P. & Weible, C. (2007). Theories of the Policy Process, Cambridge: Westview Press. Sabatier, P. Ed. pp. 189-222. Salamon, L. (2000). The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action: An Introduction. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 28 (5): 1611-1674. Schulz, M. (2001). Organizational Learning. En: Joel A. C. Baum (ed) Companion to Organizations. Washington: Blackwell. Steinmo, S. (2008). What is Historical Institutionalism?. In: Approaches in the Social Sciences, Donatella Della Porta and Michael Keating (Eds.). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Streeck, W. & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tilly, C. (1995). To Explain Political Processes. American Journal of Sociology, 100 (6): 1594-1610. Walker, W., Rahman, A., Adnan, S & Cave, J. (2001). Adaptive policies, policy analysis and policymaking. European Journal of Operational Research, 128 (20), 282 – 289. Young, P. (1996). The Economics of Convention. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10 (2): 105-122. Zittoun, P. (2011). From Instrument to Policy: Observing the Meaning Process to Make a Decision. Political Science Review, 48 (5): 106-124. Criterios - 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Español Publication Criterios Universidad San Buenaventura El presente artículo expone dos contribuciones teóricas del institucionalismohistórico a la ciencia política que, a diferencia de losestudios más representativos que ha orientado esta corriente de pensamiento en la disciplina, se centran en el ámbito del análisis político antes que en la reconstrucción de macrodinámicas de cambio institucional.La primera de ellas corresponde al esclarecimiento conceptualde la capacidad que tienen los instrumentos de acción pública para estructurar el contenido sustancial de la política, la incidencia que tienen en la representación de los problemas públicos, y el rol que ejercen sobre la formación y/o transmisión de preferencias. La segunda se refiere a las implicaciones de la dimensión temporal de las políticas, con base en la cual es posible controvertir gran parte de las aproximaciones convencionales de la disciplina en torno a los procesos de aprendizaje. application/pdf Martínez Coral, Patricia 8 2 Núm. 2 , Año 2015 : (Julio-Diciembre) Artículo de revista Journal article Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político* 2015-11-30T00:00:00Z https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/criterios/article/download/2207/1931 2011-5733 178 155 2015-11-30T00:00:00Z 2015-11-30 https://doi.org/10.21500/20115733.2207 10.21500/20115733.2207 |