Correlation between handgrip strength and hand-forearm anthropometry

Correlation between handgrip strength and hand-forearm anthropometry

The Pearson correlation coeffi cient (r) between the grip strength and hand-forearm anthropometry was found to determine either existing or not a linear relation among them. Collecting data of the variables was obtained from ten young adults in both, right and left hand-forearm, it was taken into account some qualitative variables: to be right-handed, the gender with five (5) men and five (5) women, and it was established as a condition that the individual was healthy and did not have a previous career as an athlete. A direct linear relationship with hand anthropometry and the grip strength is concluded, even though as expected, there was a strong difference between the force exerted by a male and a female individual, being the first strong... Ver más

Guardado en:

Respuestas

0122-820X

2422-5053

Villegas Bermúdez, Diego Fernando

Castro Bermúdez, Juan Dayal

Fuentes Manrique, Omar Andrés

UNIVERSIDAD FRANCISCO DE PAULA SANTANDER

10.22463/0122820X.1679

23

2018-07-01

6

11

Colombia

Anthropometry, Forearm, Grip strength, Hanf, Pearson

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id 86f345be4d7f917033fbd0a1d1ed8bab
record_format ojs
spelling Correlation between handgrip strength and hand-forearm anthropometry
Anthropometry, Forearm, Grip strength, Hanf, Pearson
Respuestas
Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander
Artículo de revista
23
2
Villegas Bermúdez, Diego Fernando
Castro Bermúdez, Juan Dayal
Fuentes Manrique, Omar Andrés
The Pearson correlation coeffi cient (r) between the grip strength and hand-forearm anthropometry was found to determine either existing or not a linear relation among them. Collecting data of the variables was obtained from ten young adults in both, right and left hand-forearm, it was taken into account some qualitative variables: to be right-handed, the gender with five (5) men and five (5) women, and it was established as a condition that the individual was healthy and did not have a previous career as an athlete. A direct linear relationship with hand anthropometry and the grip strength is concluded, even though as expected, there was a strong difference between the force exerted by a male and a female individual, being the first stronger. Respect to the forearm, an inverse relation was found between the maximum circumference of the forearm and the grip strength. Finally, the strongest relationships found were in the width and length of the palm, as well as in the circumference of the wrist. Results were validated comparing the results of this research against the results of specialized literature. Some considerations may be considered for future research. Grip strength can promote the risk of accidents and ergonomists should consider this factor appropriately for their design.  
P. Bruce and A. Bruce, Practical statistics for data scientists: 50 essential concepts Beijing: OReilly, 2017.
T. G. Lohmann, A. F. Roche, and R. Martorell, Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Human Kinetics Books, Champaign, III., 1988.
P. Karl and G. Francis, “VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. 58, no. 347–352, pp. 240–242, 1895.
J.W. Garrett, “The Adult Human Hand: Some Anthropometric and Biomechanical Considerations,” Human Factors, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 117–131, 1971.
S. Giampaoli et al., “Hand-grip strength predicts incident disability in non-disabled older men.,” Age Ageing, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 283–288, May 1999.
Panero and M. Zelnik, Human Dimension and Interior Space. New York: Random House US, 2014.
Coordinación de promoción y prevención, “Protocolo De Evaluación De Medidas Antropométricas,”, Colombiana de Salud, 2014.
Instituto Nacional de Salud, “Medidas antropométricas, registro y estandarización,” 1998.
V. Mathiowetz, K. Weber, G. Volland and N. Kashman, “Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations”, The Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 222–226, 1984.
Universidad de los Andes, “Protocolo para la toma y registro de medidas antropométricas” Nieer, 2009.
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
D.A. Kallman, C.C. Plato and J.D. Tobin, “The Role of Muscle Loss in the Age-Related Decline of Grip Strength: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Perspectives”, Journal of Gerontology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 82–88, 1990.
V. Mathiowetz, C. Rennells and L. Donahoe, “Effect of elbow position on grip and key pinch strength”, The Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 694–697, 1985.
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
H.C. Roberts et al., “A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: Towards a standardised approach,” Age Ageing, vol. 40, no. 4, pp.423–429, 2011.
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
A.W. Castellanos-Morantes y L.E. Méndez-Serrano, “Estudio de la Relación entre la Antropometría de la Mano y la Distribución de Fuerzas en el Agarre Máximo en Individuos no Atletas”, trabajo de fin de grado, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, 2017.
S. Daniels-Gilbert and H.T.E. Hertzberg, “Applied Anthropometry of the Hand”, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 209-216, 1952.
J. Sallinen, S. Stenholm, T. Rantanen, M. Heliövaara, P. Sainio and S. Koskinen, “Hand grip strength cut points to screen older persons at risk for mobility limitation,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 1721–1726, 2010.
Inglés
El coeficiente de correlación de Pearson (r) entre la fuerza de agarre y la antropometría del antebrazo manual supone una relación existente o no lineal entre ellos. La recopilación de datos de las variables se obtuvo de diez adultos jóvenes, tanto en el antebrazo derecho como en el izquierdo, se tuvieron en cuenta algunas variables cualitativas: ser diestro, el género con cinco (5) hombres y cinco (5) mujeres, y se establecieron como condiciones que el individuo estaba sano y no tenía una carrera previa como atleta. Se concluye una relación lineal directa con la antropometría de la mano y la fuerza de agarre, aunque como se esperaba, existía una gran diferencia entre la fuerza ejercida por un individuo masculino y femenino, siendo la primera más fuerte. Respecto al antebrazo, se encontró una relación inversa entre la circunferencia máxima del antebrazo y la fuerza de agarre. Finalmente, las relaciones más fuertes encontradas fueron en el ancho y largo de la palma, así como en la circunferencia de la muñeca. Los resultados se validaron comparando los resultados de esta investigación con los resultados de literaturas especializadas. Algunas consideraciones pueden ser consideradas para futuras investigaciones. La fuerza de agarre puede promover el riesgo de accidentes y los ergónomos deben considerar este factor de manera adecuada para su diseño.
Anthropometry, Forearm, Grip strength, Hanf, Pearson
Journal article
application/pdf
text/html
C.W. Nicolay and A.L. Walker, “Grip strength and endurance: Influences of anthropometric variation, hand dominance, and gender,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 605–618, 2005.
https://revistas.ufps.edu.co/index.php/respuestas/article/view/1679
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
J. Rodríguez, F. Maradei y J. Martínez, “Improvement of a cutting flowers tool by using ergonomic design”, Revista UIS Ingenierías, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 161–166, 2019.
D. Leyk et al., “Hand-Grip Strength of Young Men, Women and Highly Trained Female Athletes”, European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 415– 21, 2007.
T. Kanchan and K. Krishan, “Anthropometry of hand in sex determination of dismembered remains - A review of literature,” Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, vol.18, no. 1, pp. 14–17, 2011.
Correlation between handgrip strength and hand-forearm anthropometry
R.M. White. “Comparative Anthropometry of the Hand”, Army Natick Research and Development Laboratories, 1981.
Publication
https://revistas.ufps.edu.co/index.php/respuestas/article/download/1679/2312
https://revistas.ufps.edu.co/index.php/respuestas/article/download/1679/1879
0122-820X
6
2422-5053
2018-07-01
2018-07-01T00:00:00Z
2018-07-01T00:00:00Z
11
10.22463/0122820X.1679
https://doi.org/10.22463/0122820X.1679
institution UNIVERSIDAD FRANCISCO DE PAULA SANTANDER
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADFRANCISCODEPAULASANTANDER/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Respuestas
title Correlation between handgrip strength and hand-forearm anthropometry
spellingShingle Correlation between handgrip strength and hand-forearm anthropometry
Villegas Bermúdez, Diego Fernando
Castro Bermúdez, Juan Dayal
Fuentes Manrique, Omar Andrés
Anthropometry, Forearm, Grip strength, Hanf, Pearson
Anthropometry, Forearm, Grip strength, Hanf, Pearson
title_short Correlation between handgrip strength and hand-forearm anthropometry
title_full Correlation between handgrip strength and hand-forearm anthropometry
title_fullStr Correlation between handgrip strength and hand-forearm anthropometry
title_full_unstemmed Correlation between handgrip strength and hand-forearm anthropometry
title_sort correlation between handgrip strength and hand-forearm anthropometry
title_eng Correlation between handgrip strength and hand-forearm anthropometry
description The Pearson correlation coeffi cient (r) between the grip strength and hand-forearm anthropometry was found to determine either existing or not a linear relation among them. Collecting data of the variables was obtained from ten young adults in both, right and left hand-forearm, it was taken into account some qualitative variables: to be right-handed, the gender with five (5) men and five (5) women, and it was established as a condition that the individual was healthy and did not have a previous career as an athlete. A direct linear relationship with hand anthropometry and the grip strength is concluded, even though as expected, there was a strong difference between the force exerted by a male and a female individual, being the first stronger. Respect to the forearm, an inverse relation was found between the maximum circumference of the forearm and the grip strength. Finally, the strongest relationships found were in the width and length of the palm, as well as in the circumference of the wrist. Results were validated comparing the results of this research against the results of specialized literature. Some considerations may be considered for future research. Grip strength can promote the risk of accidents and ergonomists should consider this factor appropriately for their design.  
description_eng El coeficiente de correlación de Pearson (r) entre la fuerza de agarre y la antropometría del antebrazo manual supone una relación existente o no lineal entre ellos. La recopilación de datos de las variables se obtuvo de diez adultos jóvenes, tanto en el antebrazo derecho como en el izquierdo, se tuvieron en cuenta algunas variables cualitativas: ser diestro, el género con cinco (5) hombres y cinco (5) mujeres, y se establecieron como condiciones que el individuo estaba sano y no tenía una carrera previa como atleta. Se concluye una relación lineal directa con la antropometría de la mano y la fuerza de agarre, aunque como se esperaba, existía una gran diferencia entre la fuerza ejercida por un individuo masculino y femenino, siendo la primera más fuerte. Respecto al antebrazo, se encontró una relación inversa entre la circunferencia máxima del antebrazo y la fuerza de agarre. Finalmente, las relaciones más fuertes encontradas fueron en el ancho y largo de la palma, así como en la circunferencia de la muñeca. Los resultados se validaron comparando los resultados de esta investigación con los resultados de literaturas especializadas. Algunas consideraciones pueden ser consideradas para futuras investigaciones. La fuerza de agarre puede promover el riesgo de accidentes y los ergónomos deben considerar este factor de manera adecuada para su diseño.
author Villegas Bermúdez, Diego Fernando
Castro Bermúdez, Juan Dayal
Fuentes Manrique, Omar Andrés
author_facet Villegas Bermúdez, Diego Fernando
Castro Bermúdez, Juan Dayal
Fuentes Manrique, Omar Andrés
topicspa_str_mv Anthropometry, Forearm, Grip strength, Hanf, Pearson
topic Anthropometry, Forearm, Grip strength, Hanf, Pearson
Anthropometry, Forearm, Grip strength, Hanf, Pearson
topic_facet Anthropometry, Forearm, Grip strength, Hanf, Pearson
Anthropometry, Forearm, Grip strength, Hanf, Pearson
citationvolume 23
citationissue 2
publisher Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander
ispartofjournal Respuestas
source https://revistas.ufps.edu.co/index.php/respuestas/article/view/1679
language Inglés
format Article
rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
references_eng P. Bruce and A. Bruce, Practical statistics for data scientists: 50 essential concepts Beijing: OReilly, 2017.
T. G. Lohmann, A. F. Roche, and R. Martorell, Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Human Kinetics Books, Champaign, III., 1988.
P. Karl and G. Francis, “VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. 58, no. 347–352, pp. 240–242, 1895.
J.W. Garrett, “The Adult Human Hand: Some Anthropometric and Biomechanical Considerations,” Human Factors, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 117–131, 1971.
S. Giampaoli et al., “Hand-grip strength predicts incident disability in non-disabled older men.,” Age Ageing, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 283–288, May 1999.
Panero and M. Zelnik, Human Dimension and Interior Space. New York: Random House US, 2014.
Coordinación de promoción y prevención, “Protocolo De Evaluación De Medidas Antropométricas,”, Colombiana de Salud, 2014.
Instituto Nacional de Salud, “Medidas antropométricas, registro y estandarización,” 1998.
V. Mathiowetz, K. Weber, G. Volland and N. Kashman, “Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations”, The Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 222–226, 1984.
Universidad de los Andes, “Protocolo para la toma y registro de medidas antropométricas” Nieer, 2009.
D.A. Kallman, C.C. Plato and J.D. Tobin, “The Role of Muscle Loss in the Age-Related Decline of Grip Strength: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Perspectives”, Journal of Gerontology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 82–88, 1990.
V. Mathiowetz, C. Rennells and L. Donahoe, “Effect of elbow position on grip and key pinch strength”, The Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 694–697, 1985.
H.C. Roberts et al., “A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: Towards a standardised approach,” Age Ageing, vol. 40, no. 4, pp.423–429, 2011.
A.W. Castellanos-Morantes y L.E. Méndez-Serrano, “Estudio de la Relación entre la Antropometría de la Mano y la Distribución de Fuerzas en el Agarre Máximo en Individuos no Atletas”, trabajo de fin de grado, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, 2017.
S. Daniels-Gilbert and H.T.E. Hertzberg, “Applied Anthropometry of the Hand”, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 209-216, 1952.
J. Sallinen, S. Stenholm, T. Rantanen, M. Heliövaara, P. Sainio and S. Koskinen, “Hand grip strength cut points to screen older persons at risk for mobility limitation,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 1721–1726, 2010.
C.W. Nicolay and A.L. Walker, “Grip strength and endurance: Influences of anthropometric variation, hand dominance, and gender,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 605–618, 2005.
J. Rodríguez, F. Maradei y J. Martínez, “Improvement of a cutting flowers tool by using ergonomic design”, Revista UIS Ingenierías, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 161–166, 2019.
D. Leyk et al., “Hand-Grip Strength of Young Men, Women and Highly Trained Female Athletes”, European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 415– 21, 2007.
T. Kanchan and K. Krishan, “Anthropometry of hand in sex determination of dismembered remains - A review of literature,” Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, vol.18, no. 1, pp. 14–17, 2011.
R.M. White. “Comparative Anthropometry of the Hand”, Army Natick Research and Development Laboratories, 1981.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2018-07-01
date_accessioned 2018-07-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2018-07-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revistas.ufps.edu.co/index.php/respuestas/article/view/1679
url_doi https://doi.org/10.22463/0122820X.1679
issn 0122-820X
eissn 2422-5053
doi 10.22463/0122820X.1679
citationstartpage 6
citationendpage 11
url2_str_mv https://revistas.ufps.edu.co/index.php/respuestas/article/download/1679/2312
url3_str_mv https://revistas.ufps.edu.co/index.php/respuestas/article/download/1679/1879
_version_ 1797194855848345600

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares