Estructura Factorial del Inventario de Violencia en las Relaciones de Noviazgo para Adolescentes Mexicanos (VADRI-MX)

El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la estructura factorial y fiabilidad de la escala de Violence in Adolescent’s Dating Relationship Inventory (VADRI) y obtener una versión más corta para facilitar su aplicación en el contexto mexicano. Participaron 1,055 estudiantes mexicanos con edades comprendidas entre 14 y 22 (M = 17.66, SD = 1.95). El 48.1% eran mujeres. La estructura factorial de tres componentes resultante del análisis de componentes principales fue confirmada en el análisis factorial confirmatorio. El VADRI-MX, que consta de 19 ítems-dobles (perpetración y victimización), se compone de tres factores sobre violencia en el noviazgo: “directa y severa”, “psicológica sutil/controladora” y “psicológica visible/verbal”. La escala c... Ver más

Guardado en:

2011-2084

2011-7922

12

2019-09-05

29

36

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

International Journal of Psychological Research - 2019

id 86546f020525a7a2e2e370ac8ebf5828
record_format ojs
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection International Journal of Psychological Research
title Estructura Factorial del Inventario de Violencia en las Relaciones de Noviazgo para Adolescentes Mexicanos (VADRI-MX)
spellingShingle Estructura Factorial del Inventario de Violencia en las Relaciones de Noviazgo para Adolescentes Mexicanos (VADRI-MX)
Aizpitarte Gorrotxategi, Alazne
Rojas-Solís, José Luis
violencia en el noviazgo
VADRI
estructura factorial
adolescencia
evaluación
dating violence
assessment
adolescence
factorial structure
VADRI
title_short Estructura Factorial del Inventario de Violencia en las Relaciones de Noviazgo para Adolescentes Mexicanos (VADRI-MX)
title_full Estructura Factorial del Inventario de Violencia en las Relaciones de Noviazgo para Adolescentes Mexicanos (VADRI-MX)
title_fullStr Estructura Factorial del Inventario de Violencia en las Relaciones de Noviazgo para Adolescentes Mexicanos (VADRI-MX)
title_full_unstemmed Estructura Factorial del Inventario de Violencia en las Relaciones de Noviazgo para Adolescentes Mexicanos (VADRI-MX)
title_sort estructura factorial del inventario de violencia en las relaciones de noviazgo para adolescentes mexicanos (vadri-mx)
description El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la estructura factorial y fiabilidad de la escala de Violence in Adolescent’s Dating Relationship Inventory (VADRI) y obtener una versión más corta para facilitar su aplicación en el contexto mexicano. Participaron 1,055 estudiantes mexicanos con edades comprendidas entre 14 y 22 (M = 17.66, SD = 1.95). El 48.1% eran mujeres. La estructura factorial de tres componentes resultante del análisis de componentes principales fue confirmada en el análisis factorial confirmatorio. El VADRI-MX, que consta de 19 ítems-dobles (perpetración y victimización), se compone de tres factores sobre violencia en el noviazgo: “directa y severa”, “psicológica sutil/controladora” y “psicológica visible/verbal”. La escala consta de una alta consistencia interna. Las correlaciones entre las tres dimensiones fueron moderadas. El VADRI-MX ha mostrado ser una herramienta de evaluación útil, válida y fiable para evaluar la violencia en el noviazgo en la adolescencia. Se discuten las implicaciones para la prevención, intervención e investigación.
description_eng This study aimed to analyze the factorial structure and reliability of the Violence in Adolescent’s Dating Relationship Inventory (VADRI) and to get a shorter form to facilitate its application in the Mexican context. Participants were 1,055 Mexican’ students which ages ranged between 14 and 22 years (M = 17.66, SD = 1.95). The 48.1% were females. A principal component analyses resulted in a three-factor structure which that was confirmed in the confirmatory factor analyses. The VADRI-MX assesses with 19-double items (perpetration and victimization) the three dimensions of the dating violence underlying construct: “Direct and severe”, “Subtle psychological/controlling”, and “Overt psychological/verbal.” Internal consistency was high. Correlations among the three dimensions were moderate. We can conclude that the VADRI-MX is a useful, valid, and reliable assessment tool for assessing dating violence in the adolescence period. Implications for prevention, intervention, and research are discussed.
author Aizpitarte Gorrotxategi, Alazne
Rojas-Solís, José Luis
author_facet Aizpitarte Gorrotxategi, Alazne
Rojas-Solís, José Luis
topicspa_str_mv violencia en el noviazgo
VADRI
estructura factorial
adolescencia
evaluación
topic violencia en el noviazgo
VADRI
estructura factorial
adolescencia
evaluación
dating violence
assessment
adolescence
factorial structure
VADRI
topic_facet violencia en el noviazgo
VADRI
estructura factorial
adolescencia
evaluación
dating violence
assessment
adolescence
factorial structure
VADRI
citationvolume 12
citationissue 2
citationedition Núm. 2 , Año 2019 : Volume 12(2)
publisher Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
ispartofjournal International Journal of Psychological Research
source https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/4222
language Inglés
format Article
rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
International Journal of Psychological Research - 2019
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
references_eng Aizpitarte, A., Alonso-Arbiol, I., Van de Vijver, F. J., Perdomo, M. C., Galvez-Sobral, J. A., & Garcia-Lopez, E. (2017). Development of a dating violence assessment tool for late adolescence across three countries: The violence in Adolescents’ Dating Relationships Inventory (VADRI). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(17), 2626-2646. Arbuckle, J. L. (2014). SPSS 23.0 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS. Ayala, M. D. L. C., Molleda, C. B., Rodríguez-Franco, L., Galaz, M. F., Ramiro-Sánchez, T., & Díaz, F. J. R. (2014). Unperceived dating violence among Mexican students. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14(1), 39-47. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. Cabrera-Nguyen, P. (2010). Author guidelines for reporting scale development and validation results in the Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1(2), 99–103. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014). Understanding teen dating violence: Fact sheet. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/teen-dating-violence-factsheet-a.pdf Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016). Violence Prevention. Teen dating violence. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/teen_dating_violence.html Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. David-Ferdon, C., & Hertz, M. F. (2007). Electronic media, violence, and adolescents: An emerging public health problem. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S1-S5. Foshee, V. A., Linder, G. F., Bauman, K. E., Langwick, S. A., Arriaga, X. B., Heath, J. L., ... & Bangdiwala, S. (1996). The Safe Dates Project: Theoretical basis, evaluation design, and selected baseline findings. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12(5), 39-47. Hoerger, M., & Currell, C. (2012). Ethical issues in internet research. In S. Knapp, M. Gottlieb, M. Handelsman, y L. VandeCreek (Eds.), APA handbook of ethics in psychology, Vol. 2: Practice, teaching, and research (pp. 385-400). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. Knox, L., Lomonaco, C., & Alpert, E. (2009). Adolescent relationship violence. In C. Mitchell & D. Anglin (Eds.), Intimate partner violence: A health-based perspective (pp. 511-530). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Lohman, B. J., Neppl, T. K., Senia, J. M., & Schofield, T. J. (2013). Understanding adolescent and family influences on intimate partner psychological violence during emerging adulthood and adulthood. Journal of youth and adolescence, 42(4), 500-517. Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2000). The weighted oblimin rotation. Psychometrika, 65(3), 301-318. López-Cepero, J., Rodríguez-Franco, L., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2015). Evaluación de la violencia de pareja. Una revisión de instrumentos de evaluación conductual [Measuring intimate partner abuse: A review of behavioral assessment tools]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 40, 37-50. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J., & Hong, S. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(4), 611-637. Marshall, L. L. (1999). Effects of men's subtle and overt psychological abuse on low-income women. Violence and Victims, 14(1), 69-88. Moreno-Manso, J. M., Blázquez-Alonso, M., García-Baamonde, M. E., Guerrero-Barona, E., & Pozueco-Romero, J. M. (2014). Gender as an explanatory factor of psychological abuse in dating couples. Journal of Social Service Research, 40(1), 1-14. Muñoz-Rivas, M. J., Andreu, J. M., Graña, J. L., O’Leary, K. D., & Gonzalez, P. (2007). Validación de la versión modificada de la Conflicts Tactics Scale (M-CTS) en población juvenil española [Validation of the modified version of the Conflict Tactics Scale (M-CTS) in a Spanish youth population]. Psicothema, 19(4), 692-697. Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998-2010). Mplus User’s Guide. Sixth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Neukrug, E., & Fawcett, R. (2014). Essentials of testing and assessment: A practical guide for counselors, social workers, and psychologists. Belmons, CA: Thomsons Brooks/Cole. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. O’Leary, K. D., & Slep, A. M. S. (2003). A dyadic longitudinal model of adolescent dating aggression. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32(3), 314-327. Rodríguez-Franco, L., López-Cepero Borrego, J., Rodríguez, F. J., Bringas, C., Antuña, A., & Pineda, C. E. (2010). Validation of the Dating Violence Questionnaire, DVQ (Cuestionario de Violencia entre Novios, CUVINO) among Spanish-Speaking Youth: Analysis of Results in Spain, Mexico and Argentina. Annual Clinical and Health Psychology, 6, 43-50. Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J., Herrero-Olaizola, J. B., Rodríguez-Franco, L., Bringas-Molleda, C., Paíno-Quesada, S. y Pérez-Sánchez, B. (2017). Validation of Dating Violence Questionnarie-R (DVQ-R). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 17(1), 77-84. Sociedad Mexicana de Psicología (2010). Código ético del Psicólogo [Ethical code of the Psychologist]. México, D.F.: Trillas. Smith, J., Mulford, C., Latzman, N. E., Tharp, A. T., Niolon, P. H., & Blachman-Demner, D. (2015). Taking stock of behavioral measures of adolescent dating violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24(6), 674-692. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41(1), 75-88. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283-316. Ureña, J., Romera, E. M., Casas, J. A., Viejo, C., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2015). Psichometrics properties of Psychological Dating Violence Questionnaire: A study with young couples. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(1), 52-60. Wolfe, D. A., Scott, K., Reitzel-Jaffe, D., Wekerle, C., Grasley, C., & Straatman, A. (2001). Development and validation of the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 277-293. Yanez-Peñúñuri, L. Y., Hidalgo-Rasmussen, C. A., & Chávez-Flores, Y. V. (2019). Revisión sistemática de instrumentos de violencia en el noviazgo en Iberoamérica y evaluación de sus propiedades de medida [Systematic review of dating violence questionnaires in Ibero-America and evaluation of their measurement properties]. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 24(6), 2249-2262.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2019-09-05
date_accessioned 2019-09-05T22:27:21Z
date_available 2019-09-05T22:27:21Z
url https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/4222
url_doi https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4222
issn 2011-2084
eissn 2011-7922
doi 10.21500/20112084.4222
citationstartpage 29
citationendpage 36
url4_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/4222/3665
url2_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/4222/3427
_version_ 1797648628825718784
spelling Estructura Factorial del Inventario de Violencia en las Relaciones de Noviazgo para Adolescentes Mexicanos (VADRI-MX)
violencia en el noviazgo
Artículo de revista
VADRI
estructura factorial
adolescencia
Estructura Factorial del Inventario de Violencia en las Relaciones de Noviazgo para Adolescentes Mexicanos (VADRI-MX)
evaluación
El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la estructura factorial y fiabilidad de la escala de Violence in Adolescent’s Dating Relationship Inventory (VADRI) y obtener una versión más corta para facilitar su aplicación en el contexto mexicano. Participaron 1,055 estudiantes mexicanos con edades comprendidas entre 14 y 22 (M = 17.66, SD = 1.95). El 48.1% eran mujeres. La estructura factorial de tres componentes resultante del análisis de componentes principales fue confirmada en el análisis factorial confirmatorio. El VADRI-MX, que consta de 19 ítems-dobles (perpetración y victimización), se compone de tres factores sobre violencia en el noviazgo: “directa y severa”, “psicológica sutil/controladora” y “psicológica visible/verbal”. La escala consta de una alta consistencia interna. Las correlaciones entre las tres dimensiones fueron moderadas. El VADRI-MX ha mostrado ser una herramienta de evaluación útil, válida y fiable para evaluar la violencia en el noviazgo en la adolescencia. Se discuten las implicaciones para la prevención, intervención e investigación.
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Aizpitarte, A., Alonso-Arbiol, I., Van de Vijver, F. J., Perdomo, M. C., Galvez-Sobral, J. A., & Garcia-Lopez, E. (2017). Development of a dating violence assessment tool for late adolescence across three countries: The violence in Adolescents’ Dating Relationships Inventory (VADRI). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(17), 2626-2646. Arbuckle, J. L. (2014). SPSS 23.0 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS. Ayala, M. D. L. C., Molleda, C. B., Rodríguez-Franco, L., Galaz, M. F., Ramiro-Sánchez, T., & Díaz, F. J. R. (2014). Unperceived dating violence among Mexican students. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14(1), 39-47. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. Cabrera-Nguyen, P. (2010). Author guidelines for reporting scale development and validation results in the Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1(2), 99–103. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014). Understanding teen dating violence: Fact sheet. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/teen-dating-violence-factsheet-a.pdf Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016). Violence Prevention. Teen dating violence. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/teen_dating_violence.html Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. David-Ferdon, C., & Hertz, M. F. (2007). Electronic media, violence, and adolescents: An emerging public health problem. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S1-S5. Foshee, V. A., Linder, G. F., Bauman, K. E., Langwick, S. A., Arriaga, X. B., Heath, J. L., ... & Bangdiwala, S. (1996). The Safe Dates Project: Theoretical basis, evaluation design, and selected baseline findings. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12(5), 39-47. Hoerger, M., & Currell, C. (2012). Ethical issues in internet research. In S. Knapp, M. Gottlieb, M. Handelsman, y L. VandeCreek (Eds.), APA handbook of ethics in psychology, Vol. 2: Practice, teaching, and research (pp. 385-400). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. Knox, L., Lomonaco, C., & Alpert, E. (2009). Adolescent relationship violence. In C. Mitchell & D. Anglin (Eds.), Intimate partner violence: A health-based perspective (pp. 511-530). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Lohman, B. J., Neppl, T. K., Senia, J. M., & Schofield, T. J. (2013). Understanding adolescent and family influences on intimate partner psychological violence during emerging adulthood and adulthood. Journal of youth and adolescence, 42(4), 500-517. Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2000). The weighted oblimin rotation. Psychometrika, 65(3), 301-318. López-Cepero, J., Rodríguez-Franco, L., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2015). Evaluación de la violencia de pareja. Una revisión de instrumentos de evaluación conductual [Measuring intimate partner abuse: A review of behavioral assessment tools]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 40, 37-50. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J., & Hong, S. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(4), 611-637. Marshall, L. L. (1999). Effects of men's subtle and overt psychological abuse on low-income women. Violence and Victims, 14(1), 69-88. Moreno-Manso, J. M., Blázquez-Alonso, M., García-Baamonde, M. E., Guerrero-Barona, E., & Pozueco-Romero, J. M. (2014). Gender as an explanatory factor of psychological abuse in dating couples. Journal of Social Service Research, 40(1), 1-14. Muñoz-Rivas, M. J., Andreu, J. M., Graña, J. L., O’Leary, K. D., & Gonzalez, P. (2007). Validación de la versión modificada de la Conflicts Tactics Scale (M-CTS) en población juvenil española [Validation of the modified version of the Conflict Tactics Scale (M-CTS) in a Spanish youth population]. Psicothema, 19(4), 692-697. Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998-2010). Mplus User’s Guide. Sixth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Neukrug, E., & Fawcett, R. (2014). Essentials of testing and assessment: A practical guide for counselors, social workers, and psychologists. Belmons, CA: Thomsons Brooks/Cole. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. O’Leary, K. D., & Slep, A. M. S. (2003). A dyadic longitudinal model of adolescent dating aggression. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32(3), 314-327. Rodríguez-Franco, L., López-Cepero Borrego, J., Rodríguez, F. J., Bringas, C., Antuña, A., & Pineda, C. E. (2010). Validation of the Dating Violence Questionnaire, DVQ (Cuestionario de Violencia entre Novios, CUVINO) among Spanish-Speaking Youth: Analysis of Results in Spain, Mexico and Argentina. Annual Clinical and Health Psychology, 6, 43-50. Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J., Herrero-Olaizola, J. B., Rodríguez-Franco, L., Bringas-Molleda, C., Paíno-Quesada, S. y Pérez-Sánchez, B. (2017). Validation of Dating Violence Questionnarie-R (DVQ-R). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 17(1), 77-84. Sociedad Mexicana de Psicología (2010). Código ético del Psicólogo [Ethical code of the Psychologist]. México, D.F.: Trillas. Smith, J., Mulford, C., Latzman, N. E., Tharp, A. T., Niolon, P. H., & Blachman-Demner, D. (2015). Taking stock of behavioral measures of adolescent dating violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24(6), 674-692. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41(1), 75-88. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283-316. Ureña, J., Romera, E. M., Casas, J. A., Viejo, C., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2015). Psichometrics properties of Psychological Dating Violence Questionnaire: A study with young couples. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(1), 52-60. Wolfe, D. A., Scott, K., Reitzel-Jaffe, D., Wekerle, C., Grasley, C., & Straatman, A. (2001). Development and validation of the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 277-293. Yanez-Peñúñuri, L. Y., Hidalgo-Rasmussen, C. A., & Chávez-Flores, Y. V. (2019). Revisión sistemática de instrumentos de violencia en el noviazgo en Iberoamérica y evaluación de sus propiedades de medida [Systematic review of dating violence questionnaires in Ibero-America and evaluation of their measurement properties]. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 24(6), 2249-2262.
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
International Journal of Psychological Research - 2019
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Inglés
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/4222
International Journal of Psychological Research
Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
text/xml
application/pdf
Publication
This study aimed to analyze the factorial structure and reliability of the Violence in Adolescent’s Dating Relationship Inventory (VADRI) and to get a shorter form to facilitate its application in the Mexican context. Participants were 1,055 Mexican’ students which ages ranged between 14 and 22 years (M = 17.66, SD = 1.95). The 48.1% were females. A principal component analyses resulted in a three-factor structure which that was confirmed in the confirmatory factor analyses. The VADRI-MX assesses with 19-double items (perpetration and victimization) the three dimensions of the dating violence underlying construct: “Direct and severe”, “Subtle psychological/controlling”, and “Overt psychological/verbal.” Internal consistency was high. Correlations among the three dimensions were moderate. We can conclude that the VADRI-MX is a useful, valid, and reliable assessment tool for assessing dating violence in the adolescence period. Implications for prevention, intervention, and research are discussed.
Aizpitarte Gorrotxategi, Alazne
Rojas-Solís, José Luis
Journal article
dating violence
assessment
Núm. 2 , Año 2019 : Volume 12(2)
2
12
adolescence
factorial structure
VADRI
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/4222/3665
2019-09-05
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/4222/3427
2019-09-05T22:27:21Z
29
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4222
10.21500/20112084.4222
2011-7922
2011-2084
2019-09-05T22:27:21Z
36