Características de la familia de origen como predictores de las motivaciones para tener hijos

En este estudio se analizan las experiencias de la infancia y la relación con la familia de origen como variables predictivas de la motivación para la parentalidad positiva (MPP). El estudio se llevó a cabo mediante análisis de Modelaje de Ecuaciones Estructurales Multigrupo como método, aplicándolo en una muestra peruana (n = 1494, 72.2% mujeres) y una brasileña (n = 1507; 84.0% mujeres). Los resultados evidencian que las variables cuidado de hermanos menores y adaptación familiar son predictores estadísticamente significativos de la MPP en ambos países, mientras que la variable número de hermanos no se presentó como predictor en ninguno de los casos. La autonomía familiar se mostró como un predictor solo en el caso de Brasil y el orden de... Ver más

Guardado en:

0123-9155

1909-9711

27

2024-02-05

167

180

Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2024

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id 849e974e2a4ce9f5be07a6936d7a166d
record_format ojs
institution UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADCATOLICADECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Acta Colombiana de Psicología
title Características de la familia de origen como predictores de las motivaciones para tener hijos
spellingShingle Características de la familia de origen como predictores de las motivaciones para tener hijos
Callegaro Borsa, Juliane
Vasquez, Giuliana
planificación familiar
salud reproductiva
experiencias infantiles
Motivación
relaciones familiares
Motivation
family relations
childhood experiences
family planning
reproductive health
title_short Características de la familia de origen como predictores de las motivaciones para tener hijos
title_full Características de la familia de origen como predictores de las motivaciones para tener hijos
title_fullStr Características de la familia de origen como predictores de las motivaciones para tener hijos
title_full_unstemmed Características de la familia de origen como predictores de las motivaciones para tener hijos
title_sort características de la familia de origen como predictores de las motivaciones para tener hijos
title_eng Family of Origin Characteristics as Predictors of Childbearing Motivations
description En este estudio se analizan las experiencias de la infancia y la relación con la familia de origen como variables predictivas de la motivación para la parentalidad positiva (MPP). El estudio se llevó a cabo mediante análisis de Modelaje de Ecuaciones Estructurales Multigrupo como método, aplicándolo en una muestra peruana (n = 1494, 72.2% mujeres) y una brasileña (n = 1507; 84.0% mujeres). Los resultados evidencian que las variables cuidado de hermanos menores y adaptación familiar son predictores estadísticamente significativos de la MPP en ambos países, mientras que la variable número de hermanos no se presentó como predictor en ninguno de los casos. La autonomía familiar se mostró como un predictor solo en el caso de Brasil y el orden de nacimiento solo en Perú. El análisis multigrupo muestra que la diferencia en los efectos de la adaptación familiar y la autonomía familiar en la MPP está moderada por el país de origen. En resumen, este estudio proporciona evidencia empírica de que variables familiares predicen la MPP y destaca el efecto moderador del país de origen en las muestras analizadas.
description_eng This study examines childhood experiences and the relationship with the family of origin as predictive variables for positive childbearing motivation (PCM). It was conducted through analyses using the method of Multigroup Structural Equation Modeling, which were conducted on a Peruvian sample (n = 1494, 72.2% females) and a Brazilian sample (n = 1507; 84.0% females). The results indicate that the variables caring of younger siblings and family adaptation are statistically significant predictors of PCM in both countries, while the variable number of siblings did not emerge as a predictor in either case. Family autonomy emerged as a predictor only in Brazil, and birth order only in Peru. Multigroup analysis shows that the difference in the effects of “family adaptation” and “family autonomy” on PCM is moderated by the country of origin. In summary, this study provides empirical evidence that family variables predictPCM and highlights the moderating effect of the country of origin in the analyzed samples.
author Callegaro Borsa, Juliane
Vasquez, Giuliana
author_facet Callegaro Borsa, Juliane
Vasquez, Giuliana
topicspa_str_mv planificación familiar
salud reproductiva
experiencias infantiles
Motivación
relaciones familiares
topic planificación familiar
salud reproductiva
experiencias infantiles
Motivación
relaciones familiares
Motivation
family relations
childhood experiences
family planning
reproductive health
topic_facet planificación familiar
salud reproductiva
experiencias infantiles
Motivación
relaciones familiares
Motivation
family relations
childhood experiences
family planning
reproductive health
citationvolume 27
citationissue 1
citationedition Núm. 1 , Año 2024 :Acta Colombiana de Psicología
publisher Universidad Católica de Colombia
ispartofjournal Acta Colombiana de Psicología
source https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4698
language Inglés
format Article
rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2024
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references_eng Ahmed, G. S., Saleh, L., Alareed, H. R., El-Shabrawy, E. M., & Elbahrawe, R. S. (2022). Effects of sociodemographic background on fertility motivation patterns in the Beni-Suef governorate, Upper Egypt. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 17(5), 853-860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.04.006 Alexander, K. A., Arrington Sanders, R., Grace, K. T., Thorpe, R. J., Doro, E., & Bowleg, L. (2021). “Having a child meant I had a real life”: Reproductive coercion and childbearing motivations among young Black men living in Baltimore. Journal of interpersonal violence, 36(17-18), NP9197-NP9225. https://doi. org/10.1177/0886260519853400 Ballesteros, J. C., & Sanmartín, A. (2017). Emancipación en tiempos de crisis. Revista de Estudios de Juventud, (116), Document 10, 143-154. https://www.injuve.es/observatorio/formacion-empleo-y-vivienda/revista-de-estudios-de-juventud-116-jovenes-y-vivienda Baptista, M. M. (2009). Estudos culturais: o quê e o como da investigação. Carnets. Revue électronique d’études psychologiques de l’APEF, Première Série (1 Special Number), 451-461. https://doi.org/10.4000/carnets.4382 Baptista, M. N. (2005). Desenvolvimento do Inventario de Percepção de Suporte Familiar (IPSF): estudos psicométricos preliminares. PsicoUSF, 10(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-82712005000100003 Baptista, M. N. (2007). Inventario de Percepção de Suporte Familiar (IPSF): estudo componencial em duas configurações. Psicologia ciência e profissão, 27(3), 496-509. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-98932007000300010 Baptista, M. N., & Campos, D. C. D. (2015). Metodologias de pesquisa em ciências. Análises quantitativa e qualitativa. In M. N. Baptista & D. C. D. Campos, Metodologias de Pesquisa em Ciências: análises Quantitativa e Qualitativa (pp. 299-299). LTC. Comunicação Edición. Barber, J. S., Miller, W., Kusunoki, Y., Hayford, S. R., & Guzzo, K. B. (2019). Intimate relationship dynamics and changing desire for pregnancy among young women. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 51(3), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12119 Borsa, J. C., Damásio, B. F., & Bandeira, D. R. (2012). Adaptação e validação de instrumentos psicológicos entre culturas: algumas considerações. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 22(53), 423-432. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103- 863X2012000300014 Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford publications. Buber‐Ennser, I., Setz, I., & Riederer, B. (2023). Not Even a Pandemic Makes Them Change Their Family Plans: The Impact of COVID‐19 on Fertility Intentions in Austria [Special Issue]. Population and Development Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12555 Chasiotis, A., Bender, M., & Hofer, J. (2014). Childhood context explains cultural variance in implicit parenting motivation: Results from two studies with six samples from Cameroon, Costa Rica, Germany, and PR China. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200203 Chasiotis, A., Hofer, J., & Campos, D. (2006). When does liking children lead to parenthood? Younger siblings, implicit prosocial power motivation, and explicit love for children predict parenthood across cultures. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 4(2), 95-123. https://doi.org/10.1556/jcep.4.2006.2.2 Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th Edition). Sage publications. Djiometio, J. N., Antoniou, T., Kristman, V., Schiff, R., Gamble, M., Kennedy, L., Yudin, M., & Loutfy, M. (2019). Understanding the fertility desires and intentions among HIV-positive men living in Ontario: survey instrument development and validation. Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC), 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325958219831018 Gerson, M. J. (1980). The lure of Motherhood. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5(2), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1980.tb00957.x Gerson, M. J. (1983). A scale of motivation for parenthood: The index of parenthood motivation. The Journal of Psychology, 113(2), 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1983.9923577 Gerson, M. J. (1984). Feminism and the wish for a child. Sex roles, 11(5-6), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF00287467 Gerson, M. J. (1986). The prospect of parenthood for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1986.tb00736.x Gonzaga, P. R., & Aras, L. M. (2015). Mulheres Latino-Americanas e a Luta por Direitos Reprodutivos: o panorama da conjuntura política e legal do aborto nos países da América Latina. Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Américas, 9(2). https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/repam/article/view/16040 Guo, Y., Wichaidit, W., Du, Y., Liu, J., & Chongsuvivatwong, V. (2022). Mediation of the association between stigma and HIV status and fertility intention by fertility desire among heterosexual couples living with HIV in Kunming, China. Plos one, 17(12), Article e0278244. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278244 International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (second edition). International Test Commission. https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf Jiménez, M. A. Aliaga, L. & Rodriguez, V. J. (2011). Una mirada desde América Latina y el Caribe al Objetivo de Desarrollo del Milenio de acceso universal a la salud reproductiva. United Nations Fund for Population Activities. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/7132-mirada-america-latina-caribe-al-objetivo-desarrollo-milenio-acceso-universal-la Liu, C., Rahman, M. N. A., Mao, Y., Wang, X., & Yu, X. (2023). Fertility Desire of Chinese Parents to Have More Children Under the Three-Child Policy. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS], 31, 455-481. https:// so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jpss/article/view/262464 Mattos, A. R., & Castro, L. R. D. (2016). Jovens e a liberdade: reflexões sobre autonomia, responsabilidade e independência. Psicologia y Sociedade, 28(1), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-03102015v28n1p065 Miller, W. B. (1992). Personality traits and developmental experiences as antecedents of childbearing motivation. Demography, 29(2), 265-285. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061731 Miller, W. B. (1994). Childbearing motivations, desires, and intentions: A theoretical framework. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 120(2), 223- 258. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1994-40830-001 Miller, W. B. (1995). Childbearing motivation and its measurement. Journal of Biosocial Science, 27(4), 473-487. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932000023087 Miller, W. B. (2011a). Comparing the TPB and the TDIB framework. Vienna yearbook of population research, 9, 19-29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41342799 Miller, W. B. (2011b). Differences between fertility desires and intentions: Implications for theory, research and policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 75-98. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41342806 Miller, W. B. (2015). Childbearing motivation: Some puzzles, some solutions, and some new questions [Conference Presentation]. 43rd Annual Psychosocial Workshop, April 28-29. San Diego, CA. Miller, W. B. (2021). Childbearing motivation and the TDIB framework: Research across the life course informs theory development [Preprint]. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33290.80326 Miller, W. B., & Pasta, D. J. (1993). Motivational and nonmotivational determinants of child-number desires. Population and Environment, 15(2), 113-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02209405 Miller, W. B., Barber, J. S., & Gatny, H. H. (2013). The effects of ambivalent fertility desires on pregnancy risk in young women in the USA. Population studies, 67(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2012.738823 Morosow, K., & Kolk, M. (2020). How does birth order and number of siblings affect fertility? A within-family comparison using Swedish register data. European Journal of Population, 36(2), 197-233. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10680-019-09525-0 Rezamahalleh, F. A., Khadivzadeh, T., & Nekah, M. A. (2020). Comparing the Childbearing Motivations of Fertile and Infertile Women in Mashhad, Iran. Journal of Midwifery & Reproductive Health, 8(4), 2429-2436. https:// doi.org/10.22038/jmrh.2019.28904.1312 Rich, S., Haintz, G. L., McKenzie, H., & Graham, M. (2021). Factors that Shape Women’s Reproductive Decision-Making: A Scoping Review. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 11(2), 9-31. https://www.ceeol.com/search/ article-detail?id=1013489 Varas, G. V., & Borsa, J. C. (2019). Revisión Sistemática del Estudio de las Motivaciones para la Parentalidad. Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia, 19(1), 261-283. https://doi.org/10.12957/e2019.43019 Varas, G. V., & Borsa, J. C. (2020a). Childbearing Motivation Questionnaire: Adaptação e evidencias iniciais de validade para seu uso no Brasil. Revista Psico, 51(4), Article e36089. https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistapsico/article/view/36089 Varas, G. V., & Borsa, J. C. (2020b). Motivaciones para tener y no tener hijos en Perú: variables de influencia en las decisiones reproductivas [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Varas, G. V., & Borsa, J. C. (2020c). Childbearing Motivation Questionnaire: Adaptación transcultural y evidencias de validez en Perú. Estudos de Psicologia [Manuscript in press]. https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/ estpsi/index Varas, G. V., & Borsa, J. C. (2020d). Childbearing Motivation Questionnaire (CBQ): Análise da invariância da medida entre brasileiros e peruanos [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Varas, G. V., & Borsa, J. C. (2021). Predictor Variables of Childbearing Motivations in Brazilian Women and Men. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 31(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3112 Wang, Jichuan, & Xiaoqian Wang. (2019). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus (2nd Edition). Wiley. World Bank (April 1, 2023a). Fertility rate, total (births per woman). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN World Bank (April 1, 2023b). Índices de Gini. https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053 Zarzalejos, J. & Fernández, L. E. (2018). América Latina en Cifras. Fundación para el Análisis y los Estudios Sociales. FAES Fundación para el Análisis y los Estudios Sociales. https://fundacionfaes.org/wp-content/ uploads/2021/08/20181121114417america-latina-en-cifras.pdf
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2024-02-05
date_accessioned 2024-02-05T00:00:00Z
date_available 2024-02-05T00:00:00Z
url https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4698
url_doi https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2024.27.1.9
issn 0123-9155
eissn 1909-9711
doi 10.14718/ACP.2024.27.1.9
citationstartpage 167
citationendpage 180
url2_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4698/4984
_version_ 1797466509071613952
spelling Características de la familia de origen como predictores de las motivaciones para tener hijos
planificación familiar
Acta Colombiana de Psicología
Artículo de revista
Núm. 1 , Año 2024 :Acta Colombiana de Psicología
1
27
salud reproductiva
Universidad Católica de Colombia
experiencias infantiles
En este estudio se analizan las experiencias de la infancia y la relación con la familia de origen como variables predictivas de la motivación para la parentalidad positiva (MPP). El estudio se llevó a cabo mediante análisis de Modelaje de Ecuaciones Estructurales Multigrupo como método, aplicándolo en una muestra peruana (n = 1494, 72.2% mujeres) y una brasileña (n = 1507; 84.0% mujeres). Los resultados evidencian que las variables cuidado de hermanos menores y adaptación familiar son predictores estadísticamente significativos de la MPP en ambos países, mientras que la variable número de hermanos no se presentó como predictor en ninguno de los casos. La autonomía familiar se mostró como un predictor solo en el caso de Brasil y el orden de nacimiento solo en Perú. El análisis multigrupo muestra que la diferencia en los efectos de la adaptación familiar y la autonomía familiar en la MPP está moderada por el país de origen. En resumen, este estudio proporciona evidencia empírica de que variables familiares predicen la MPP y destaca el efecto moderador del país de origen en las muestras analizadas.
Motivación
Callegaro Borsa, Juliane
Vasquez, Giuliana
relaciones familiares
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2024
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Ahmed, G. S., Saleh, L., Alareed, H. R., El-Shabrawy, E. M., & Elbahrawe, R. S. (2022). Effects of sociodemographic background on fertility motivation patterns in the Beni-Suef governorate, Upper Egypt. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 17(5), 853-860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.04.006 Alexander, K. A., Arrington Sanders, R., Grace, K. T., Thorpe, R. J., Doro, E., & Bowleg, L. (2021). “Having a child meant I had a real life”: Reproductive coercion and childbearing motivations among young Black men living in Baltimore. Journal of interpersonal violence, 36(17-18), NP9197-NP9225. https://doi. org/10.1177/0886260519853400 Ballesteros, J. C., & Sanmartín, A. (2017). Emancipación en tiempos de crisis. Revista de Estudios de Juventud, (116), Document 10, 143-154. https://www.injuve.es/observatorio/formacion-empleo-y-vivienda/revista-de-estudios-de-juventud-116-jovenes-y-vivienda Baptista, M. M. (2009). Estudos culturais: o quê e o como da investigação. Carnets. Revue électronique d’études psychologiques de l’APEF, Première Série (1 Special Number), 451-461. https://doi.org/10.4000/carnets.4382 Baptista, M. N. (2005). Desenvolvimento do Inventario de Percepção de Suporte Familiar (IPSF): estudos psicométricos preliminares. PsicoUSF, 10(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-82712005000100003 Baptista, M. N. (2007). Inventario de Percepção de Suporte Familiar (IPSF): estudo componencial em duas configurações. Psicologia ciência e profissão, 27(3), 496-509. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-98932007000300010 Baptista, M. N., & Campos, D. C. D. (2015). Metodologias de pesquisa em ciências. Análises quantitativa e qualitativa. In M. N. Baptista & D. C. D. Campos, Metodologias de Pesquisa em Ciências: análises Quantitativa e Qualitativa (pp. 299-299). LTC. Comunicação Edición. Barber, J. S., Miller, W., Kusunoki, Y., Hayford, S. R., & Guzzo, K. B. (2019). Intimate relationship dynamics and changing desire for pregnancy among young women. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 51(3), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12119 Borsa, J. C., Damásio, B. F., & Bandeira, D. R. (2012). Adaptação e validação de instrumentos psicológicos entre culturas: algumas considerações. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 22(53), 423-432. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103- 863X2012000300014 Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford publications. Buber‐Ennser, I., Setz, I., & Riederer, B. (2023). Not Even a Pandemic Makes Them Change Their Family Plans: The Impact of COVID‐19 on Fertility Intentions in Austria [Special Issue]. Population and Development Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12555 Chasiotis, A., Bender, M., & Hofer, J. (2014). Childhood context explains cultural variance in implicit parenting motivation: Results from two studies with six samples from Cameroon, Costa Rica, Germany, and PR China. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200203 Chasiotis, A., Hofer, J., & Campos, D. (2006). When does liking children lead to parenthood? Younger siblings, implicit prosocial power motivation, and explicit love for children predict parenthood across cultures. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 4(2), 95-123. https://doi.org/10.1556/jcep.4.2006.2.2 Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th Edition). Sage publications. Djiometio, J. N., Antoniou, T., Kristman, V., Schiff, R., Gamble, M., Kennedy, L., Yudin, M., & Loutfy, M. (2019). Understanding the fertility desires and intentions among HIV-positive men living in Ontario: survey instrument development and validation. Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC), 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325958219831018 Gerson, M. J. (1980). The lure of Motherhood. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5(2), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1980.tb00957.x Gerson, M. J. (1983). A scale of motivation for parenthood: The index of parenthood motivation. The Journal of Psychology, 113(2), 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1983.9923577 Gerson, M. J. (1984). Feminism and the wish for a child. Sex roles, 11(5-6), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF00287467 Gerson, M. J. (1986). The prospect of parenthood for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1986.tb00736.x Gonzaga, P. R., & Aras, L. M. (2015). Mulheres Latino-Americanas e a Luta por Direitos Reprodutivos: o panorama da conjuntura política e legal do aborto nos países da América Latina. Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Américas, 9(2). https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/repam/article/view/16040 Guo, Y., Wichaidit, W., Du, Y., Liu, J., & Chongsuvivatwong, V. (2022). Mediation of the association between stigma and HIV status and fertility intention by fertility desire among heterosexual couples living with HIV in Kunming, China. Plos one, 17(12), Article e0278244. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278244 International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (second edition). International Test Commission. https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf Jiménez, M. A. Aliaga, L. & Rodriguez, V. J. (2011). Una mirada desde América Latina y el Caribe al Objetivo de Desarrollo del Milenio de acceso universal a la salud reproductiva. United Nations Fund for Population Activities. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/7132-mirada-america-latina-caribe-al-objetivo-desarrollo-milenio-acceso-universal-la Liu, C., Rahman, M. N. A., Mao, Y., Wang, X., & Yu, X. (2023). Fertility Desire of Chinese Parents to Have More Children Under the Three-Child Policy. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS], 31, 455-481. https:// so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jpss/article/view/262464 Mattos, A. R., & Castro, L. R. D. (2016). Jovens e a liberdade: reflexões sobre autonomia, responsabilidade e independência. Psicologia y Sociedade, 28(1), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-03102015v28n1p065 Miller, W. B. (1992). Personality traits and developmental experiences as antecedents of childbearing motivation. Demography, 29(2), 265-285. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061731 Miller, W. B. (1994). Childbearing motivations, desires, and intentions: A theoretical framework. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 120(2), 223- 258. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1994-40830-001 Miller, W. B. (1995). Childbearing motivation and its measurement. Journal of Biosocial Science, 27(4), 473-487. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932000023087 Miller, W. B. (2011a). Comparing the TPB and the TDIB framework. Vienna yearbook of population research, 9, 19-29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41342799 Miller, W. B. (2011b). Differences between fertility desires and intentions: Implications for theory, research and policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 75-98. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41342806 Miller, W. B. (2015). Childbearing motivation: Some puzzles, some solutions, and some new questions [Conference Presentation]. 43rd Annual Psychosocial Workshop, April 28-29. San Diego, CA. Miller, W. B. (2021). Childbearing motivation and the TDIB framework: Research across the life course informs theory development [Preprint]. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33290.80326 Miller, W. B., & Pasta, D. J. (1993). Motivational and nonmotivational determinants of child-number desires. Population and Environment, 15(2), 113-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02209405 Miller, W. B., Barber, J. S., & Gatny, H. H. (2013). The effects of ambivalent fertility desires on pregnancy risk in young women in the USA. Population studies, 67(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2012.738823 Morosow, K., & Kolk, M. (2020). How does birth order and number of siblings affect fertility? A within-family comparison using Swedish register data. European Journal of Population, 36(2), 197-233. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10680-019-09525-0 Rezamahalleh, F. A., Khadivzadeh, T., & Nekah, M. A. (2020). Comparing the Childbearing Motivations of Fertile and Infertile Women in Mashhad, Iran. Journal of Midwifery & Reproductive Health, 8(4), 2429-2436. https:// doi.org/10.22038/jmrh.2019.28904.1312 Rich, S., Haintz, G. L., McKenzie, H., & Graham, M. (2021). Factors that Shape Women’s Reproductive Decision-Making: A Scoping Review. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 11(2), 9-31. https://www.ceeol.com/search/ article-detail?id=1013489 Varas, G. V., & Borsa, J. C. (2019). Revisión Sistemática del Estudio de las Motivaciones para la Parentalidad. Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia, 19(1), 261-283. https://doi.org/10.12957/e2019.43019 Varas, G. V., & Borsa, J. C. (2020a). Childbearing Motivation Questionnaire: Adaptação e evidencias iniciais de validade para seu uso no Brasil. Revista Psico, 51(4), Article e36089. https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistapsico/article/view/36089 Varas, G. V., & Borsa, J. C. (2020b). Motivaciones para tener y no tener hijos en Perú: variables de influencia en las decisiones reproductivas [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Varas, G. V., & Borsa, J. C. (2020c). Childbearing Motivation Questionnaire: Adaptación transcultural y evidencias de validez en Perú. Estudos de Psicologia [Manuscript in press]. https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/ estpsi/index Varas, G. V., & Borsa, J. C. (2020d). Childbearing Motivation Questionnaire (CBQ): Análise da invariância da medida entre brasileiros e peruanos [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Varas, G. V., & Borsa, J. C. (2021). Predictor Variables of Childbearing Motivations in Brazilian Women and Men. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 31(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3112 Wang, Jichuan, & Xiaoqian Wang. (2019). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus (2nd Edition). Wiley. World Bank (April 1, 2023a). Fertility rate, total (births per woman). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN World Bank (April 1, 2023b). Índices de Gini. https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053 Zarzalejos, J. & Fernández, L. E. (2018). América Latina en Cifras. Fundación para el Análisis y los Estudios Sociales. FAES Fundación para el Análisis y los Estudios Sociales. https://fundacionfaes.org/wp-content/ uploads/2021/08/20181121114417america-latina-en-cifras.pdf
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Inglés
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4698
Publication
Journal article
Motivation
family relations
Family of Origin Characteristics as Predictors of Childbearing Motivations
application/pdf
childhood experiences
family planning
reproductive health
This study examines childhood experiences and the relationship with the family of origin as predictive variables for positive childbearing motivation (PCM). It was conducted through analyses using the method of Multigroup Structural Equation Modeling, which were conducted on a Peruvian sample (n = 1494, 72.2% females) and a Brazilian sample (n = 1507; 84.0% females). The results indicate that the variables caring of younger siblings and family adaptation are statistically significant predictors of PCM in both countries, while the variable number of siblings did not emerge as a predictor in either case. Family autonomy emerged as a predictor only in Brazil, and birth order only in Peru. Multigroup analysis shows that the difference in the effects of “family adaptation” and “family autonomy” on PCM is moderated by the country of origin. In summary, this study provides empirical evidence that family variables predictPCM and highlights the moderating effect of the country of origin in the analyzed samples.
10.14718/ACP.2024.27.1.9
2024-02-05T00:00:00Z
https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2024.27.1.9
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4698/4984
2024-02-05
180
167
0123-9155
1909-9711
2024-02-05T00:00:00Z