La revolución filosófica de Kuhn

En este artículo postulamos que el trabajo de Kuhn es una revolución filosófica para la filosofía de la ciencia. La búsqueda de revoluciones filosóficas es una extensión de las ideas de Kuhn acerca de las revoluciones científicas. Las revoluciones filosóficas se distinguen de las revoluciones científicas en algunos aspectos que discutimos en este trabajo. Defendemos que la revolución kuhniana consiste en la naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia que se desprende de sus trabajos y discutimos la analogía biológica que Kuhn empleó como un ejemplo ilustrativo.

Guardado en:

0124-6127

2462-9596

17

2015-01-01

47

66

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Discusiones Filosóficas - 2016

id 7d2e446314df64bf77dfeaf53df16ecf
record_format ojs
spelling La revolución filosófica de Kuhn
___. The road since structure: philosophical essays, 1970-1993, with an autobiographical interview. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. Impreso.
Reichenbach, Hans. Experience and Prediction: An analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938. Impreso.
Radzicki, Michael. “Reflections on ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 49-53. Impreso.
___. “The Nature of the Darwinian Revolution”. Science. 176 (4038), 1972: 981-989. Impreso.
Mayr, Ernst. “Do Thomas Kuhn’s scientific revolution take place”. What Makes Biology Unique? Considerations on the Autonomy of a Scientific Discipline. USA: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 159-170. Impreso.
Mauskopf, Seymour H. “Thomas S. Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution”. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences. 42(5), 2012: 551-556. Impreso.
Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti. “Revolution as Evolution. The concept of evolution in Kuhn’s philosophy”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012: 134-152. Impreso.
Kuhn, Thomas S. La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2013. Impreso.
Reydon, Thomas; Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. “Discussion: Kuhn’s Evolutionary Analogy in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and The Road Since Structure”. Philosophy of Science. 77(3), 2010: 468-476. Impreso.
Jogalekar, Ashutosh. “Chemistry and Biology: Kuhnian or Galisonian?” The curious wave function. Scientific American Blog Network. 2012. Consultado: Sep 18, 2015. Online. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/the-curious-wavefunction/chemistry-galisonian-rather-than-kuhnian/Jones, Keith. “Is Kuhn a sociologist?”. The British Journal of Philosophy of Science. 37, 1986: 443-452. Impreso
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. “Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution”. Foundations of Chemistry. 10(2), 2008: 101-115. Impreso.
___. “A comparison of two models of scientific progress”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 46, 2014: 94-99. Impreso.
De Langhe, Rogier. “The Kuhnian Paradigm”. Topoi - An International Review of Philosophy. 32, 2013: 65- 73. Impreso.
Chang, Hasok. “Incommensurability: Revisiting the Chemical Revolution”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012: 153-177. Impreso.
Chae, Huiseung; Yook, Soon-Hyung; Kim, Yup. “Phase Transitions in Paradigm Shift Models”. PLoS ONE. 8, 2013: e70928. Impreso.
Bornholdt, S.; Jensen, M.H.; Sneppen, K. “Emergence and Decline of Scientific Paradigms”. Physical Review Letters. 106, 2011:058701. Impreso.
Renzi, Barbara. “Kuhn’s Evolutionary Epistemology and Its Being Undermined by Inadequate Biological Concepts”. Philosophy of Science. 76 (2), 2009:143-159. Impreso.
Ruse, Michael. “Was there a Darwinian Revolution? Yes, no, and maybe!” Endeavour. 38(3-4), 2014: 159-168. Impreso.
___. “La filosofía de la historia de la ciencia de Thomas Kuhn”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Jul. 13(21), 2012(a): 167-185. Impreso.
___. “Assessing the influence of Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions”. Metascience. 21, 2012: 1-10. Impreso.
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
___. Kuhn’s evolutionary social epistemology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Impreso.
___. “The Darwinian revolution: Rethinking its meaning and significance”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106, 2009: 10040-10047. Impreso.
Wray, K. Brad. “Is Science Really a Young Man’s Game?” Social Studies of Science. 33(1), 2003: 137-149. Impreso.
Wittenberg, Jason; Sterman, John D. “Path Dependence, Competition, and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific Revolution”. Organization Science. May. 10(3), 1999: 322-341. Impreso.
Wittenberg, Jason. “On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 21-33. Impreso.
Sterman, John D.; Wittenberg, Jason. “Competition and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific Revolutions”. Proceedings of the International System Dynamics Conference. Cancun: Monterey Institute of Technology, 1993. Impreso.
___. “Response to ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 35-42. Impreso.
Sterman, John D. “The growth of knowledge: Testing a theory of scientific revolutions with a formal model”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 28(2), 1985: 93-122. Impreso.
Sánchez Vázquez, Adolfo. “Las revoluciones filosóficas: de Kant a Marx”. Filosofía y circunstancias. Rubí (Barcelona): Anthropos; México: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UNAM, 1997. Impreso.
___. “Kuhn, Naturalism and the Social Study of Science”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012(b). Impreso.
___. “Naturalizing Kuhn”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Jun. 2005: 99-117. Impreso.
Publication
Discusiones Filosóficas
17
28
Núm. 28 , Año 2016 : Enero - Junio
Artículo de revista
Bird, Alexander. “The Kuhn’s wrong turning”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 33, 2002: 443-463. Impreso.
paradigma filosófico kuhniano
revolución kuhniana
naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia
application/pdf
Universidad de Caldas
Revolución filosófica
Cocho, Germinal
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2952
Miramontes, Pedro
G. Laguna, Humberto
Español
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Discusiones Filosóficas - 2016
En este artículo postulamos que el trabajo de Kuhn es una revolución filosófica para la filosofía de la ciencia. La búsqueda de revoluciones filosóficas es una extensión de las ideas de Kuhn acerca de las revoluciones científicas. Las revoluciones filosóficas se distinguen de las revoluciones científicas en algunos aspectos que discutimos en este trabajo. Defendemos que la revolución kuhniana consiste en la naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia que se desprende de sus trabajos y discutimos la analogía biológica que Kuhn empleó como un ejemplo ilustrativo.
Alsina, José. “Modelos de cambio científico a partir de la selección natural: análisis y propuestas”. LLULL, Revista de la Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias y de las Técnicas. 29, 2006: 221-257. Impreso.
Barlas, Yaman. “Comments on ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 43-47. Impreso.
aturalization of the philosophy of science
In this paper we propose that Kuhn's work constitutes a philosophical revolution in the Philosophy of Science. The search for philosophical revolutions is an extension of Kuhn's ideas about scientific revolutions severed from the scientific field. Revolutions in Philosophy are different from those in Science due to some relevant aspects which we briefly discuss in this work. We argue that the Kuhnian philosophical revolution consists in the naturalization of the Philosophy of Science which we find in his writings, finally we discuss Kuhn's biological analogy as an illustrative instance.
Philosophical revolution
Kuhn’s philosophical revolution
Kuhnian revolution
Kuhnian philosophical paradigm
Journal article
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/2952/2730
2015-01-01
0124-6127
2462-9596
10.17151/difil.2016.17.28.4
https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2016.17.28.4
47
66
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Discusiones Filosóficas
title La revolución filosófica de Kuhn
spellingShingle La revolución filosófica de Kuhn
Cocho, Germinal
Miramontes, Pedro
G. Laguna, Humberto
paradigma filosófico kuhniano
revolución kuhniana
naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia
Revolución filosófica
aturalization of the philosophy of science
Philosophical revolution
Kuhnian revolution
Kuhnian philosophical paradigm
title_short La revolución filosófica de Kuhn
title_full La revolución filosófica de Kuhn
title_fullStr La revolución filosófica de Kuhn
title_full_unstemmed La revolución filosófica de Kuhn
title_sort la revolución filosófica de kuhn
title_eng Kuhn’s philosophical revolution
description En este artículo postulamos que el trabajo de Kuhn es una revolución filosófica para la filosofía de la ciencia. La búsqueda de revoluciones filosóficas es una extensión de las ideas de Kuhn acerca de las revoluciones científicas. Las revoluciones filosóficas se distinguen de las revoluciones científicas en algunos aspectos que discutimos en este trabajo. Defendemos que la revolución kuhniana consiste en la naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia que se desprende de sus trabajos y discutimos la analogía biológica que Kuhn empleó como un ejemplo ilustrativo.
description_eng In this paper we propose that Kuhn's work constitutes a philosophical revolution in the Philosophy of Science. The search for philosophical revolutions is an extension of Kuhn's ideas about scientific revolutions severed from the scientific field. Revolutions in Philosophy are different from those in Science due to some relevant aspects which we briefly discuss in this work. We argue that the Kuhnian philosophical revolution consists in the naturalization of the Philosophy of Science which we find in his writings, finally we discuss Kuhn's biological analogy as an illustrative instance.
author Cocho, Germinal
Miramontes, Pedro
G. Laguna, Humberto
author_facet Cocho, Germinal
Miramontes, Pedro
G. Laguna, Humberto
topicspa_str_mv paradigma filosófico kuhniano
revolución kuhniana
naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia
Revolución filosófica
topic paradigma filosófico kuhniano
revolución kuhniana
naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia
Revolución filosófica
aturalization of the philosophy of science
Philosophical revolution
Kuhnian revolution
Kuhnian philosophical paradigm
topic_facet paradigma filosófico kuhniano
revolución kuhniana
naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia
Revolución filosófica
aturalization of the philosophy of science
Philosophical revolution
Kuhnian revolution
Kuhnian philosophical paradigm
citationvolume 17
citationissue 28
citationedition Núm. 28 , Año 2016 : Enero - Junio
publisher Universidad de Caldas
ispartofjournal Discusiones Filosóficas
source https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2952
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Discusiones Filosóficas - 2016
references ___. The road since structure: philosophical essays, 1970-1993, with an autobiographical interview. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. Impreso.
Reichenbach, Hans. Experience and Prediction: An analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938. Impreso.
Radzicki, Michael. “Reflections on ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 49-53. Impreso.
___. “The Nature of the Darwinian Revolution”. Science. 176 (4038), 1972: 981-989. Impreso.
Mayr, Ernst. “Do Thomas Kuhn’s scientific revolution take place”. What Makes Biology Unique? Considerations on the Autonomy of a Scientific Discipline. USA: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 159-170. Impreso.
Mauskopf, Seymour H. “Thomas S. Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution”. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences. 42(5), 2012: 551-556. Impreso.
Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti. “Revolution as Evolution. The concept of evolution in Kuhn’s philosophy”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012: 134-152. Impreso.
Kuhn, Thomas S. La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2013. Impreso.
Reydon, Thomas; Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. “Discussion: Kuhn’s Evolutionary Analogy in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and The Road Since Structure”. Philosophy of Science. 77(3), 2010: 468-476. Impreso.
Jogalekar, Ashutosh. “Chemistry and Biology: Kuhnian or Galisonian?” The curious wave function. Scientific American Blog Network. 2012. Consultado: Sep 18, 2015. Online. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/the-curious-wavefunction/chemistry-galisonian-rather-than-kuhnian/Jones, Keith. “Is Kuhn a sociologist?”. The British Journal of Philosophy of Science. 37, 1986: 443-452. Impreso
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. “Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution”. Foundations of Chemistry. 10(2), 2008: 101-115. Impreso.
___. “A comparison of two models of scientific progress”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 46, 2014: 94-99. Impreso.
De Langhe, Rogier. “The Kuhnian Paradigm”. Topoi - An International Review of Philosophy. 32, 2013: 65- 73. Impreso.
Chang, Hasok. “Incommensurability: Revisiting the Chemical Revolution”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012: 153-177. Impreso.
Chae, Huiseung; Yook, Soon-Hyung; Kim, Yup. “Phase Transitions in Paradigm Shift Models”. PLoS ONE. 8, 2013: e70928. Impreso.
Bornholdt, S.; Jensen, M.H.; Sneppen, K. “Emergence and Decline of Scientific Paradigms”. Physical Review Letters. 106, 2011:058701. Impreso.
Renzi, Barbara. “Kuhn’s Evolutionary Epistemology and Its Being Undermined by Inadequate Biological Concepts”. Philosophy of Science. 76 (2), 2009:143-159. Impreso.
Ruse, Michael. “Was there a Darwinian Revolution? Yes, no, and maybe!” Endeavour. 38(3-4), 2014: 159-168. Impreso.
___. “La filosofía de la historia de la ciencia de Thomas Kuhn”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Jul. 13(21), 2012(a): 167-185. Impreso.
___. “Assessing the influence of Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions”. Metascience. 21, 2012: 1-10. Impreso.
___. Kuhn’s evolutionary social epistemology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Impreso.
___. “The Darwinian revolution: Rethinking its meaning and significance”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106, 2009: 10040-10047. Impreso.
Wray, K. Brad. “Is Science Really a Young Man’s Game?” Social Studies of Science. 33(1), 2003: 137-149. Impreso.
Wittenberg, Jason; Sterman, John D. “Path Dependence, Competition, and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific Revolution”. Organization Science. May. 10(3), 1999: 322-341. Impreso.
Wittenberg, Jason. “On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 21-33. Impreso.
Sterman, John D.; Wittenberg, Jason. “Competition and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific Revolutions”. Proceedings of the International System Dynamics Conference. Cancun: Monterey Institute of Technology, 1993. Impreso.
___. “Response to ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 35-42. Impreso.
Sterman, John D. “The growth of knowledge: Testing a theory of scientific revolutions with a formal model”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 28(2), 1985: 93-122. Impreso.
Sánchez Vázquez, Adolfo. “Las revoluciones filosóficas: de Kant a Marx”. Filosofía y circunstancias. Rubí (Barcelona): Anthropos; México: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UNAM, 1997. Impreso.
___. “Kuhn, Naturalism and the Social Study of Science”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012(b). Impreso.
___. “Naturalizing Kuhn”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Jun. 2005: 99-117. Impreso.
Bird, Alexander. “The Kuhn’s wrong turning”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 33, 2002: 443-463. Impreso.
Alsina, José. “Modelos de cambio científico a partir de la selección natural: análisis y propuestas”. LLULL, Revista de la Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias y de las Técnicas. 29, 2006: 221-257. Impreso.
Barlas, Yaman. “Comments on ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 43-47. Impreso.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2015-01-01
date_accessioned 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2952
url_doi https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2016.17.28.4
issn 0124-6127
eissn 2462-9596
doi 10.17151/difil.2016.17.28.4
citationstartpage 47
citationendpage 66
url2_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/2952/2730
_version_ 1797158109409443840