La revolución filosófica de Kuhn
En este artículo postulamos que el trabajo de Kuhn es una revolución filosófica para la filosofía de la ciencia. La búsqueda de revoluciones filosóficas es una extensión de las ideas de Kuhn acerca de las revoluciones científicas. Las revoluciones filosóficas se distinguen de las revoluciones científicas en algunos aspectos que discutimos en este trabajo. Defendemos que la revolución kuhniana consiste en la naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia que se desprende de sus trabajos y discutimos la analogía biológica que Kuhn empleó como un ejemplo ilustrativo.
Guardado en:
0124-6127
2462-9596
17
2015-01-01
47
66
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Discusiones Filosóficas - 2016
id |
7d2e446314df64bf77dfeaf53df16ecf |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
La revolución filosófica de Kuhn ___. The road since structure: philosophical essays, 1970-1993, with an autobiographical interview. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. Impreso. Reichenbach, Hans. Experience and Prediction: An analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938. Impreso. Radzicki, Michael. “Reflections on ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 49-53. Impreso. ___. “The Nature of the Darwinian Revolution”. Science. 176 (4038), 1972: 981-989. Impreso. Mayr, Ernst. “Do Thomas Kuhn’s scientific revolution take place”. What Makes Biology Unique? Considerations on the Autonomy of a Scientific Discipline. USA: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 159-170. Impreso. Mauskopf, Seymour H. “Thomas S. Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution”. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences. 42(5), 2012: 551-556. Impreso. Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti. “Revolution as Evolution. The concept of evolution in Kuhn’s philosophy”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012: 134-152. Impreso. Kuhn, Thomas S. La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2013. Impreso. Reydon, Thomas; Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. “Discussion: Kuhn’s Evolutionary Analogy in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and The Road Since Structure”. Philosophy of Science. 77(3), 2010: 468-476. Impreso. Jogalekar, Ashutosh. “Chemistry and Biology: Kuhnian or Galisonian?” The curious wave function. Scientific American Blog Network. 2012. Consultado: Sep 18, 2015. Online. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/the-curious-wavefunction/chemistry-galisonian-rather-than-kuhnian/Jones, Keith. “Is Kuhn a sociologist?”. The British Journal of Philosophy of Science. 37, 1986: 443-452. Impreso Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. “Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution”. Foundations of Chemistry. 10(2), 2008: 101-115. Impreso. ___. “A comparison of two models of scientific progress”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 46, 2014: 94-99. Impreso. De Langhe, Rogier. “The Kuhnian Paradigm”. Topoi - An International Review of Philosophy. 32, 2013: 65- 73. Impreso. Chang, Hasok. “Incommensurability: Revisiting the Chemical Revolution”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012: 153-177. Impreso. Chae, Huiseung; Yook, Soon-Hyung; Kim, Yup. “Phase Transitions in Paradigm Shift Models”. PLoS ONE. 8, 2013: e70928. Impreso. Bornholdt, S.; Jensen, M.H.; Sneppen, K. “Emergence and Decline of Scientific Paradigms”. Physical Review Letters. 106, 2011:058701. Impreso. Renzi, Barbara. “Kuhn’s Evolutionary Epistemology and Its Being Undermined by Inadequate Biological Concepts”. Philosophy of Science. 76 (2), 2009:143-159. Impreso. Ruse, Michael. “Was there a Darwinian Revolution? Yes, no, and maybe!” Endeavour. 38(3-4), 2014: 159-168. Impreso. ___. “La filosofía de la historia de la ciencia de Thomas Kuhn”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Jul. 13(21), 2012(a): 167-185. Impreso. ___. “Assessing the influence of Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions”. Metascience. 21, 2012: 1-10. Impreso. Text http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/article ___. Kuhn’s evolutionary social epistemology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Impreso. ___. “The Darwinian revolution: Rethinking its meaning and significance”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106, 2009: 10040-10047. Impreso. Wray, K. Brad. “Is Science Really a Young Man’s Game?” Social Studies of Science. 33(1), 2003: 137-149. Impreso. Wittenberg, Jason; Sterman, John D. “Path Dependence, Competition, and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific Revolution”. Organization Science. May. 10(3), 1999: 322-341. Impreso. Wittenberg, Jason. “On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 21-33. Impreso. Sterman, John D.; Wittenberg, Jason. “Competition and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific Revolutions”. Proceedings of the International System Dynamics Conference. Cancun: Monterey Institute of Technology, 1993. Impreso. ___. “Response to ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 35-42. Impreso. Sterman, John D. “The growth of knowledge: Testing a theory of scientific revolutions with a formal model”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 28(2), 1985: 93-122. Impreso. Sánchez Vázquez, Adolfo. “Las revoluciones filosóficas: de Kant a Marx”. Filosofía y circunstancias. Rubí (Barcelona): Anthropos; México: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UNAM, 1997. Impreso. ___. “Kuhn, Naturalism and the Social Study of Science”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012(b). Impreso. ___. “Naturalizing Kuhn”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Jun. 2005: 99-117. Impreso. Publication Discusiones Filosóficas 17 28 Núm. 28 , Año 2016 : Enero - Junio Artículo de revista Bird, Alexander. “The Kuhn’s wrong turning”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 33, 2002: 443-463. Impreso. paradigma filosófico kuhniano revolución kuhniana naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia application/pdf Universidad de Caldas Revolución filosófica Cocho, Germinal https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2952 Miramontes, Pedro G. Laguna, Humberto Español https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Discusiones Filosóficas - 2016 En este artículo postulamos que el trabajo de Kuhn es una revolución filosófica para la filosofía de la ciencia. La búsqueda de revoluciones filosóficas es una extensión de las ideas de Kuhn acerca de las revoluciones científicas. Las revoluciones filosóficas se distinguen de las revoluciones científicas en algunos aspectos que discutimos en este trabajo. Defendemos que la revolución kuhniana consiste en la naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia que se desprende de sus trabajos y discutimos la analogía biológica que Kuhn empleó como un ejemplo ilustrativo. Alsina, José. “Modelos de cambio científico a partir de la selección natural: análisis y propuestas”. LLULL, Revista de la Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias y de las Técnicas. 29, 2006: 221-257. Impreso. Barlas, Yaman. “Comments on ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 43-47. Impreso. aturalization of the philosophy of science In this paper we propose that Kuhn's work constitutes a philosophical revolution in the Philosophy of Science. The search for philosophical revolutions is an extension of Kuhn's ideas about scientific revolutions severed from the scientific field. Revolutions in Philosophy are different from those in Science due to some relevant aspects which we briefly discuss in this work. We argue that the Kuhnian philosophical revolution consists in the naturalization of the Philosophy of Science which we find in his writings, finally we discuss Kuhn's biological analogy as an illustrative instance. Philosophical revolution Kuhn’s philosophical revolution Kuhnian revolution Kuhnian philosophical paradigm Journal article 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/2952/2730 2015-01-01 0124-6127 2462-9596 10.17151/difil.2016.17.28.4 https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2016.17.28.4 47 66 |
institution |
UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS |
thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png |
country_str |
Colombia |
collection |
Discusiones Filosóficas |
title |
La revolución filosófica de Kuhn |
spellingShingle |
La revolución filosófica de Kuhn Cocho, Germinal Miramontes, Pedro G. Laguna, Humberto paradigma filosófico kuhniano revolución kuhniana naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia Revolución filosófica aturalization of the philosophy of science Philosophical revolution Kuhnian revolution Kuhnian philosophical paradigm |
title_short |
La revolución filosófica de Kuhn |
title_full |
La revolución filosófica de Kuhn |
title_fullStr |
La revolución filosófica de Kuhn |
title_full_unstemmed |
La revolución filosófica de Kuhn |
title_sort |
la revolución filosófica de kuhn |
title_eng |
Kuhn’s philosophical revolution |
description |
En este artículo postulamos que el trabajo de Kuhn es una revolución filosófica para la filosofía de la ciencia. La búsqueda de revoluciones filosóficas es una extensión de las ideas de Kuhn acerca de las revoluciones científicas. Las revoluciones filosóficas se distinguen de las revoluciones científicas en algunos aspectos que discutimos en este trabajo. Defendemos que la revolución kuhniana consiste en la naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia que se desprende de sus trabajos y discutimos la analogía biológica que Kuhn empleó como un ejemplo ilustrativo.
|
description_eng |
In this paper we propose that Kuhn's work constitutes a philosophical revolution in the Philosophy of Science. The search for philosophical revolutions is an extension of Kuhn's ideas about scientific revolutions severed from the scientific field. Revolutions in Philosophy are different from those in Science due to some relevant aspects which we briefly discuss in this work. We argue that the Kuhnian philosophical revolution consists in the naturalization of the Philosophy of Science which we find in his writings, finally we discuss Kuhn's biological analogy as an illustrative instance.
|
author |
Cocho, Germinal Miramontes, Pedro G. Laguna, Humberto |
author_facet |
Cocho, Germinal Miramontes, Pedro G. Laguna, Humberto |
topicspa_str_mv |
paradigma filosófico kuhniano revolución kuhniana naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia Revolución filosófica |
topic |
paradigma filosófico kuhniano revolución kuhniana naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia Revolución filosófica aturalization of the philosophy of science Philosophical revolution Kuhnian revolution Kuhnian philosophical paradigm |
topic_facet |
paradigma filosófico kuhniano revolución kuhniana naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia Revolución filosófica aturalization of the philosophy of science Philosophical revolution Kuhnian revolution Kuhnian philosophical paradigm |
citationvolume |
17 |
citationissue |
28 |
citationedition |
Núm. 28 , Año 2016 : Enero - Junio |
publisher |
Universidad de Caldas |
ispartofjournal |
Discusiones Filosóficas |
source |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2952 |
language |
Español |
format |
Article |
rights |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Discusiones Filosóficas - 2016 |
references |
___. The road since structure: philosophical essays, 1970-1993, with an autobiographical interview. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. Impreso. Reichenbach, Hans. Experience and Prediction: An analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938. Impreso. Radzicki, Michael. “Reflections on ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 49-53. Impreso. ___. “The Nature of the Darwinian Revolution”. Science. 176 (4038), 1972: 981-989. Impreso. Mayr, Ernst. “Do Thomas Kuhn’s scientific revolution take place”. What Makes Biology Unique? Considerations on the Autonomy of a Scientific Discipline. USA: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 159-170. Impreso. Mauskopf, Seymour H. “Thomas S. Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution”. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences. 42(5), 2012: 551-556. Impreso. Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti. “Revolution as Evolution. The concept of evolution in Kuhn’s philosophy”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012: 134-152. Impreso. Kuhn, Thomas S. La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2013. Impreso. Reydon, Thomas; Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. “Discussion: Kuhn’s Evolutionary Analogy in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and The Road Since Structure”. Philosophy of Science. 77(3), 2010: 468-476. Impreso. Jogalekar, Ashutosh. “Chemistry and Biology: Kuhnian or Galisonian?” The curious wave function. Scientific American Blog Network. 2012. Consultado: Sep 18, 2015. Online. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/the-curious-wavefunction/chemistry-galisonian-rather-than-kuhnian/Jones, Keith. “Is Kuhn a sociologist?”. The British Journal of Philosophy of Science. 37, 1986: 443-452. Impreso Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. “Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution”. Foundations of Chemistry. 10(2), 2008: 101-115. Impreso. ___. “A comparison of two models of scientific progress”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 46, 2014: 94-99. Impreso. De Langhe, Rogier. “The Kuhnian Paradigm”. Topoi - An International Review of Philosophy. 32, 2013: 65- 73. Impreso. Chang, Hasok. “Incommensurability: Revisiting the Chemical Revolution”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012: 153-177. Impreso. Chae, Huiseung; Yook, Soon-Hyung; Kim, Yup. “Phase Transitions in Paradigm Shift Models”. PLoS ONE. 8, 2013: e70928. Impreso. Bornholdt, S.; Jensen, M.H.; Sneppen, K. “Emergence and Decline of Scientific Paradigms”. Physical Review Letters. 106, 2011:058701. Impreso. Renzi, Barbara. “Kuhn’s Evolutionary Epistemology and Its Being Undermined by Inadequate Biological Concepts”. Philosophy of Science. 76 (2), 2009:143-159. Impreso. Ruse, Michael. “Was there a Darwinian Revolution? Yes, no, and maybe!” Endeavour. 38(3-4), 2014: 159-168. Impreso. ___. “La filosofía de la historia de la ciencia de Thomas Kuhn”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Jul. 13(21), 2012(a): 167-185. Impreso. ___. “Assessing the influence of Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions”. Metascience. 21, 2012: 1-10. Impreso. ___. Kuhn’s evolutionary social epistemology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Impreso. ___. “The Darwinian revolution: Rethinking its meaning and significance”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106, 2009: 10040-10047. Impreso. Wray, K. Brad. “Is Science Really a Young Man’s Game?” Social Studies of Science. 33(1), 2003: 137-149. Impreso. Wittenberg, Jason; Sterman, John D. “Path Dependence, Competition, and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific Revolution”. Organization Science. May. 10(3), 1999: 322-341. Impreso. Wittenberg, Jason. “On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 21-33. Impreso. Sterman, John D.; Wittenberg, Jason. “Competition and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific Revolutions”. Proceedings of the International System Dynamics Conference. Cancun: Monterey Institute of Technology, 1993. Impreso. ___. “Response to ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 35-42. Impreso. Sterman, John D. “The growth of knowledge: Testing a theory of scientific revolutions with a formal model”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 28(2), 1985: 93-122. Impreso. Sánchez Vázquez, Adolfo. “Las revoluciones filosóficas: de Kant a Marx”. Filosofía y circunstancias. Rubí (Barcelona): Anthropos; México: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UNAM, 1997. Impreso. ___. “Kuhn, Naturalism and the Social Study of Science”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012(b). Impreso. ___. “Naturalizing Kuhn”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Jun. 2005: 99-117. Impreso. Bird, Alexander. “The Kuhn’s wrong turning”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 33, 2002: 443-463. Impreso. Alsina, José. “Modelos de cambio científico a partir de la selección natural: análisis y propuestas”. LLULL, Revista de la Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias y de las Técnicas. 29, 2006: 221-257. Impreso. Barlas, Yaman. “Comments on ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 43-47. Impreso. |
type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
type_content |
Text |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
date_accessioned |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
date_available |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
url |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2952 |
url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2016.17.28.4 |
issn |
0124-6127 |
eissn |
2462-9596 |
doi |
10.17151/difil.2016.17.28.4 |
citationstartpage |
47 |
citationendpage |
66 |
url2_str_mv |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/2952/2730 |
_version_ |
1797158109409443840 |