Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis

Guardado en:

2011-2084

2011-7922

10

2017-08-03

25

33

International Journal of Psychological Research - 2017

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id 79ca65a493d0e7e93d990a1d0b1ee103
record_format ojs
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection International Journal of Psychological Research
title Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis
spellingShingle Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis
Rojas-Gualdrón, Diego Fernando
Economics
Global health
Happiness
Health Inequalities
Validation studies
title_short Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis
title_full Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis
title_fullStr Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis
title_full_unstemmed Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis
title_sort inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. a rasch based consequential validity analysis
description_eng Happiness has been proposed as an alternative goal in welfare analyses. Several indices have been proposed for its measurement but studies about their metric properties and validity are insufficient. In this paper, the Happy Planet Index is analyzed in terms of its consequential validity as a global health inequality indicator from the invariant measurement perspective of the Rasch model. Model fit is analyzed with emphasis on differential item functioning when comparing between world regions, and its consequential validity by comparing conclusions about the magnitude and inequalities in countries’ happiness. Main findings show enough evidences for structural and construct validity, but not for the supposed underlying score distribution; not either for its generalizability because of sever differential functioning. Conclusions about the magnitude of geographical inequalities and happiest countries substantially differed between the original index and the Rasch measure. 
author Rojas-Gualdrón, Diego Fernando
author_facet Rojas-Gualdrón, Diego Fernando
topic Economics
Global health
Happiness
Health Inequalities
Validation studies
topic_facet Economics
Global health
Happiness
Health Inequalities
Validation studies
citationvolume 10
citationissue 2
publisher Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
ispartofjournal International Journal of Psychological Research
source https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/2995
language Inglés
format Article
rights International Journal of Psychological Research - 2017
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references_eng Oxa, A., Arancibia, C., & Campero, S. (2014). Economía de la Felicidad: evidencia empírica para Latinoamérica. Revista Perspectivas, (34), 159-180. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Erlbaum. Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L. E., Jolley, L., & van Belle, G. (2006). Differential item functioning analysis with ordinal logistic regression techniques. DIFdetect and difwithpar. Medical Care, 44(11 Suppl 3), S115-S123. Cummins, R. (2016). Happiness is the Right Metric to Measure Good Societal Functioning. Society, 53(3), 273-277. Darma, M. (2013). On the economics of happiness: the influence of income and non-income factors on happiness. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, (1), 39. Engelhard, G. (2013). Invariant measurement: using Rasch models in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. New York: Routledge. Environmental Systems Research Institute. (n. d.). ESRI Web page. Retrieved from: http://www.esri.com/ Gallup. (n. d.). Gallup World Poll Website. Retrieved from: http://www.gallup.com/services/170945/world-poll.aspx Gandelman, N., & Porzecanski, R. (2013). Happiness Inequality: How Much Is Reasonable? Social Indicators Research, 110(1), 257-269. Global Footprint Network. (n. d.). Global Footprint Network Website. Retrieved from: http://www.footprintnetwork.org/es/ Houweling, T. A., Kunst, A. E., Huisman, M., & Mackenbach, J. P. (2007). Using relative and absolute measures for monitoring health inequalities: experiences from cross-national analyses on maternal and child health. International Journal for Equity in Health, 6, 15. Johns, H., & Ormerod, P. (2007). Happiness, economics and public policy. London: Institute of Economic Affairs. Retrieved from: http://www.iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/upldbook416pdf.pdf Kalmijn, W. M., & Arends, L. R. (2010). Measures of Inequality: Application to Happiness in Nations. Social Indicators Research, 99(1), 147-162. Kalmijn, W., & Veenhoven, R. (2005). Measuring Inequality of Happiness in Nations: In Search for Proper Statistics. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(4), 357-396. Kalmijn, W., & Veenhoven, R. (2014). Index of Inequality-Adjusted Happiness (IAH) Improved: A Research Note. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1259-1265. King, N. B., Harper, S., & Young, M. E. (2012). Use of relative and absolute effect measures in reporting health inequalities: structured review. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 345, e5774. Larsen, K., & Merlo, J. (2005). Appropriate assessment of neighborhood effects on individual health: integrating random and fixed effects in multilevel logistic regression. American Journal of Epidemiology, 161(1), 81-88. Merlo, J., Chaix, B., Yang, M., Lynch, J., & Rastam, L. (2005). A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: linking the statistical concept of clustering to the idea of contextual phenomenon. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(6), 443-449. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749. Stewart, F. (2014). Against Happiness: A Critical Appraisal of the Use of Measures of Happiness for Evaluating Progress in Development. Journal of Human Development & Capabilities, 15(4), 293-307. The New Economics Foundation. (n. d.-a). Happy Planet Index. Retrieved from: http://www.happyplanetindex.org/data/ The New Economics Foundation. (n. d.-b). The happy planet index: 2012 report. Retrieved from: http://www.happyplanetindex.org/assets/happy-planet-index-report.pdf The Sustainable Development Solutions Network. (2016). World Happiness Report, 2016 volume I. Retrieved from: https://templatearchive.com/world-happiness-report/ UNDP (Ed.). (2011). Sustainability and equity: a better future for all. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/271/hdr_2011_en_complete.pdf Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach. Routledge. Wolfe, E. W., & Smith, E. V., Jr. (2007). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: part II--validation activities. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8(2), 204-234.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2017-08-03
date_accessioned 2017-08-03T00:00:00Z
date_available 2017-08-03T00:00:00Z
url https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/2995
url_doi https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.2995
issn 2011-2084
eissn 2011-7922
doi 10.21500/20112084.2995
citationstartpage 25
citationendpage 33
url2_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2995/3100
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2995/3099
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2995/3098
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2995/3097
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2995/3096
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2995/2677
_version_ 1797160070113394688
spelling Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis
Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis
Artículo de revista
International Journal of Psychological Research - 2017
Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
International Journal of Psychological Research
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/2995
Inglés
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Oxa, A., Arancibia, C., & Campero, S. (2014). Economía de la Felicidad: evidencia empírica para Latinoamérica. Revista Perspectivas, (34), 159-180. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Erlbaum. Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L. E., Jolley, L., & van Belle, G. (2006). Differential item functioning analysis with ordinal logistic regression techniques. DIFdetect and difwithpar. Medical Care, 44(11 Suppl 3), S115-S123. Cummins, R. (2016). Happiness is the Right Metric to Measure Good Societal Functioning. Society, 53(3), 273-277. Darma, M. (2013). On the economics of happiness: the influence of income and non-income factors on happiness. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, (1), 39. Engelhard, G. (2013). Invariant measurement: using Rasch models in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. New York: Routledge. Environmental Systems Research Institute. (n. d.). ESRI Web page. Retrieved from: http://www.esri.com/ Gallup. (n. d.). Gallup World Poll Website. Retrieved from: http://www.gallup.com/services/170945/world-poll.aspx Gandelman, N., & Porzecanski, R. (2013). Happiness Inequality: How Much Is Reasonable? Social Indicators Research, 110(1), 257-269. Global Footprint Network. (n. d.). Global Footprint Network Website. Retrieved from: http://www.footprintnetwork.org/es/ Houweling, T. A., Kunst, A. E., Huisman, M., & Mackenbach, J. P. (2007). Using relative and absolute measures for monitoring health inequalities: experiences from cross-national analyses on maternal and child health. International Journal for Equity in Health, 6, 15. Johns, H., & Ormerod, P. (2007). Happiness, economics and public policy. London: Institute of Economic Affairs. Retrieved from: http://www.iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/upldbook416pdf.pdf Kalmijn, W. M., & Arends, L. R. (2010). Measures of Inequality: Application to Happiness in Nations. Social Indicators Research, 99(1), 147-162. Kalmijn, W., & Veenhoven, R. (2005). Measuring Inequality of Happiness in Nations: In Search for Proper Statistics. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(4), 357-396. Kalmijn, W., & Veenhoven, R. (2014). Index of Inequality-Adjusted Happiness (IAH) Improved: A Research Note. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1259-1265. King, N. B., Harper, S., & Young, M. E. (2012). Use of relative and absolute effect measures in reporting health inequalities: structured review. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 345, e5774. Larsen, K., & Merlo, J. (2005). Appropriate assessment of neighborhood effects on individual health: integrating random and fixed effects in multilevel logistic regression. American Journal of Epidemiology, 161(1), 81-88. Merlo, J., Chaix, B., Yang, M., Lynch, J., & Rastam, L. (2005). A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: linking the statistical concept of clustering to the idea of contextual phenomenon. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(6), 443-449. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749. Stewart, F. (2014). Against Happiness: A Critical Appraisal of the Use of Measures of Happiness for Evaluating Progress in Development. Journal of Human Development & Capabilities, 15(4), 293-307. The New Economics Foundation. (n. d.-a). Happy Planet Index. Retrieved from: http://www.happyplanetindex.org/data/ The New Economics Foundation. (n. d.-b). The happy planet index: 2012 report. Retrieved from: http://www.happyplanetindex.org/assets/happy-planet-index-report.pdf The Sustainable Development Solutions Network. (2016). World Happiness Report, 2016 volume I. Retrieved from: https://templatearchive.com/world-happiness-report/ UNDP (Ed.). (2011). Sustainability and equity: a better future for all. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/271/hdr_2011_en_complete.pdf Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach. Routledge. Wolfe, E. W., & Smith, E. V., Jr. (2007). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: part II--validation activities. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8(2), 204-234.
application/pdf
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
image/tiff
Publication
application/pdf
2
Happiness has been proposed as an alternative goal in welfare analyses. Several indices have been proposed for its measurement but studies about their metric properties and validity are insufficient. In this paper, the Happy Planet Index is analyzed in terms of its consequential validity as a global health inequality indicator from the invariant measurement perspective of the Rasch model. Model fit is analyzed with emphasis on differential item functioning when comparing between world regions, and its consequential validity by comparing conclusions about the magnitude and inequalities in countries’ happiness. Main findings show enough evidences for structural and construct validity, but not for the supposed underlying score distribution; not either for its generalizability because of sever differential functioning. Conclusions about the magnitude of geographical inequalities and happiest countries substantially differed between the original index and the Rasch measure. 
Rojas-Gualdrón, Diego Fernando
Economics
Global health
Happiness
Health Inequalities
Validation studies
application/pdf
10
Journal article
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2995/3101
2017-08-03
2011-7922
2017-08-03T00:00:00Z
10.21500/20112084.2995
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2995/3100
2017-08-03T00:00:00Z
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2995/3099
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2995/3098
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2995/3097
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2995/3096
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2995/2677
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.2995
33
25
2011-2084