Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review
Este artículo presenta un enfoque republicano del control judicial de constitucionalidad de las leyes que se basa en una interpretación deliberativa y participativa de este arreglo institucional. El documento se divide en cinco secciones, más una introducción. La Sección I presenta algunas consideraciones y aclaraciones sobre el concepto de control judicial y el tipo de teoría política republicana que subyace a los principales argumentos del trabajo. La Sección II reconstruye la crítica republicana al control judicial. La Sección III muestra que suscribir una perspectiva republicana no necesariamente lleva a respaldar esta crítica y presenta una defensa del control judicial que se apoya en una concepción republicana de la democracia deliber... Ver más
Guardado en:
0122-9893
2346-2051
2023-08-30
41
83
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Alejandro Cortés-Arbeláez - 2023
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
| id |
76362cc39c6dc5342293d78077971b3d |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review Hübner Mendes, Conrado. Constitutional Courts and Deliberative Democracy. Oxford Constitutional Theory. Oxford University Press, 2013. Mansbridge, Jane, James Bohman, Simone Chambers, Thomas Christiano, Archon Fung, John Parkinson, Dennis Thompson, and Mark Warren. “A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, edited by Jane Mansbridge and John Parkinson, 1–26. Cambridge University Press, 2012. Mansbridge, Jane. “Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, edited by Stephen Macedo, 211–42. Oxford University Press, 1999. Lustig, Doreen, and J. H. H. Weiler. “Judicial Review in the Contemporary World—Retrospective and Prospective.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16(2), 2018, 315–72. Linares, Sebastián. La (i) legitimidad democrática del control judicial de las leyes. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2008. Linares, Sebastián. “Democracia sin atajos: cognitivamente exigente pero participativamente austera.” Revista Derecho del Estado, 55, 2023, 57–85. Linares, Sebastián. Democracia Participativa Epistémica. Filosofía y Derecho. Marcial Pons, 2017. Landau, David, and Rosalind Dixon. “Abusive Judicial Review: Courts Against Democracy.” University of California Davis Law Review, FSU College of Law, Public Law, 53(1313), 2020, 1313–87. Lafont, Cristina. Democracy without Shortcuts. A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2020. Laborde, Cécile, and John Maynor. “The Republican Contribution to Contemporary Political Theory.” In Republicanism and Political Theory, edited by Cécile Laborde and John Maynor, 1–28. Oxford. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing, 2008. Honohan, Iseult. “Republicans, Rights, and Constitutions: Is Judicial Review Compatible with Republican Self-Government?” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009. Martí, José Luis. La República Deliberativa. Una Teoría de la Democracia. Madrid, Barcelona: Marcial Pons, 2006. Hilbink, Lisa. “Assessing the New Constitutionalism.” Comparative Politics, 40(2), 2008), 227–45. Hartmann-Cortés, Kevin, Juan Felipe Herrera, and Gabriel Hernando Angarita. “La ‘Privatización’ de la acción pública de inconstitucionalidad.” Revista Derecho del Estado, 50, 2021, 203–59. Harel, Aron. Why Law Matters. Oxford University Press, 2014. Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Massachusets: The MIT Press, 1996. Goodin, Robert. Innovating Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2008. Ginsburg, Tom, and Mila Versteeg. “Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 30(3), 2014. Ginsburg, Tom, and Tamir Moustafa. “Introduction: The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics.” In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Tom Ginsburg and Tamir Moustafa, 1–22. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Gargarella, Roberto. “Why Do We Care about Dialogue? ‘Notwithstanding Clause’, ‘Meaningful Engagement’ and Public Hearings: A Sympathetic but Critical Analysis.” In The Future of Economic and Social Rights, edited by Katharine G. Young. Globalization and Human Rights. Cambridge University Press, 2019. Ferreres, Víctor. Justicia Constitucional y Democracia. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 1997. Ferejohn, John, and Pasquale Pasquino. “Constitutional Courts as Deliberative Institutions: Toward an Institutional Theory of Constitutional Justice.” In Constitutional justice, east and west, edited by Wojciech Sadurski. Kluwer Law International, 2002. Martí, José Luis. “Is Constitutional Rigidity the Problem? Democratic Legitimacy and the Last Word.” Ratio Juris 27(4), 2014. Martí, José Luis. “The Role of New Technologies in Deliberative Democracy.” In Rule of Law vs Majoritarian Democracy, edited by Giuliano Amato, Benedetta Barbisan, and Cesare Pinelli. Bloomsbury, 2021. Eisgruber, Christopher. Constitutional Self-Government. Harvard University Press, 2001. Waldron, Jeremy. “Judges as Moral Reasoners.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 7(1), 2009, 2–24. Text http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/article Waldron, Jeremy. “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review.” The Yale Law Journal, 2006. Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford University Press, 1999. Waldron, Jeremy. “Judicial Review and Republican Government.” In That Eminent Tribunal. Judicial Supremacy and the Constitution, edited by Christopher Wolfe. New Forum Books, 2004. Waldron, Jeremy. “Five to Four: Why Do Bare Majorities Rule on Courts?” The Yale Law Journal 123, 2014, 1692–1730. Owen, David, and Graham Smith. “Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 23(2), 2015, 213–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12054. Vandamme, Pierre-Étienne, and Donald Bello Hutt. “Selecting Constitutional Judges Randomly.” Swiss Political Science Review, 21(1), 2021, 107–27. Valentini, Chiara. “Deliberative Constitutionalism and Judicial Review.” Revus [Online] 47 (2022). http://journals.openedition.org/revus/8030. Tomkins, Adam. “The Role of the Courts in the Political Constitution.” University of Toronto Law Journal, 60, 2010, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.60.1.1. Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge University Press, 2012. Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press, 1996. Pettit, Philip. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press, 1997. Pettit, Philip. “Keeping Republican Freedom Simple. On a Difference with Quentin Skinner.” Political Theory 30(3), 2002, 339–56. Pettit, Philip. “Depoliticizing Democracy.” Ratio Juris 17(1), 2004, 52–65. Pettit, Philip. “Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory.” Nomos 42, 2000, 105–44. Pettit, Philip. “Civic Republican Political Theory.” In A Political Philosophy in Public Life: Civic Republicanism in Zapatero’s Spain, by Philip Pettit and José Luis Martí. Princeton University Press, 2012. Eylon, Yuval, and Aron Harel. “The Right to Judicial Review.” Virginia Law Review 92, 2006, 991–1022. Estlund, David, and Hélène Landemore. “The Epistemic Value of Democratic Deliberation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by Andre Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren. Oxford University Press, 2018. Dryzek, John S. “Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building.” Comparative Political Studies, 42(11), 2009, 1379–1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332129. 57 Revista Derecho del Estado Departamento de Derecho Constitucional text/html application/pdf Artículo de revista Núm. 57 , Año 2023 : Septiembre-Diciembre legitimidad Español participación, democracia, republicanismo, Control judicial, Cortés-Arbeláez, Alejandro Este artículo presenta un enfoque republicano del control judicial de constitucionalidad de las leyes que se basa en una interpretación deliberativa y participativa de este arreglo institucional. El documento se divide en cinco secciones, más una introducción. La Sección I presenta algunas consideraciones y aclaraciones sobre el concepto de control judicial y el tipo de teoría política republicana que subyace a los principales argumentos del trabajo. La Sección II reconstruye la crítica republicana al control judicial. La Sección III muestra que suscribir una perspectiva republicana no necesariamente lleva a respaldar esta crítica y presenta una defensa del control judicial que se apoya en una concepción republicana de la democracia deliberativa que enfatiza el potencial de esta institución como un mecanismo que sirve para promover la participación política en igualdad de condiciones y que, por tanto, dota al control judicial de una legitimidad democrática participativa. La Sección IV argumenta que la legitimidad democrática participativa del control judicial debe ser vista como un fenómeno gradual cuya fuerza o debilidad relativa depende de las variaciones de las características específicas del contexto institucional donde opera el poder judicial. La Sección V presenta algunas conclusiones. https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/8955 text/xml http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Bächtiger, Andre, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren. “Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by Andre Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren, 1–32. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford University Press, 2018. Comparative Constitutions Project. “Replication Data for the Research Paper: Ginsburg, T., & Versteeg, M. Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?” University of Virginia School of Law Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series 2013-29.” Comparative Constitutions Project (blog), 2013. Chambers, Simone. “Citizens Without Robes: On the Deliberative Potential of Everyday Politics.” Journal of Deliberative Democracy 16(2), 2020, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.388. Bickel, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Second Edition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986. Besson, Samantha, and José Luis Martí. “Law and Republicanism: Mapping the Issues.” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009. Bello Hutt, Donald. “The Deliberative Constitutionalism Debate and a Republican Way Forward.” Jurisprudence. An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 12(1), 2020, 69–88. Bello Hutt, Donald. “Measuring Popular and Judicial Deliberation: A Critical Comparison.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16(4), 2018, 1121–47. Bello Hutt, Donald. “Deliberation and Courts: The Role of the Judiciary in a Deliberative System.” Theoria, 64 (3), 2017, 77–103. https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2017.6415204. Alejandro Cortés-Arbeláez - 2023 Bellamy, Richard. Political Constitutionalism. A Republican Defense of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2007. Bellamy, Richard. “The Republic of Reasons: Public Reasoning, Depolitization, and Non-Domination.” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009. Publication Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. Angel-Cabo, Natalia. “The Constitution and the City: Reflections on Judicial Experimentalism Through an Urban Lens.” In European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2020, edited by E. Hirsch Ballin, G. van der Schyff, M. Stremler, and M. De Visser, Vol. 2. European Yearbook of Constitutional Law. The Hague: Asser Press, 2021. Alsina, Victòria, and José Luis Martí. “The Birth of the Crowdlaw Movement: Tech-Based Citizen Participation, Legitimacy and the Quality of Lawmaking.” Analyse & Kritik 40 (2), 2018, 317–38. This paper presents a republican approach to judicial review that is based on a deliberative and participatory interpretation of this institutional arrangement. The paper is divided into five sections, plus an introduction. Section I presents some considerations and clarifications regarding the concept of judicial review and the type of republican political theory that underlies the main arguments. Section II reconstructs the republican critique of judicial review. Section III shows that subscribing to a republican perspective does not necessarily lead to the endorsement of this critique and presents a defense of judicial review that relies on a republican conception of deliberative democracy that stresses the potential of this institution as a mechanism that serves to promote political participation in equal terms and that, thus, imbues judicial review with a participatory democratic legitimacy. Section IV argues that the participatory democratic legitimacy of judicial review should be seen as a gradual phenomenon whose relative strength or weakness depends on the variations of specific characteristics of the institutional context where the judiciary operates. Section V presents some conclusions. Judicial review, republicanism, democracy, participation, legitimacy Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review Journal article 2346-2051 0122-9893 2023-08-30T11:54:52Z https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15332 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15333 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15334 41 83 10.18601/01229893.n57.03 2023-08-30T11:54:52Z https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n57.03 2023-08-30 |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Revista Derecho del Estado |
| title |
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review |
| spellingShingle |
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review Cortés-Arbeláez, Alejandro legitimidad participación, democracia, republicanismo, Control judicial, Judicial review, republicanism, democracy, participation, legitimacy |
| title_short |
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review |
| title_full |
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review |
| title_fullStr |
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review |
| title_sort |
judges without robes: a republican approach to participatory judicial review |
| title_eng |
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review |
| description |
Este artículo presenta un enfoque republicano del control judicial de constitucionalidad de las leyes que se basa en una interpretación deliberativa y participativa de este arreglo institucional. El documento se divide en cinco secciones, más una introducción. La Sección I presenta algunas consideraciones y aclaraciones sobre el concepto de control judicial y el tipo de teoría política republicana que subyace a los principales argumentos del trabajo. La Sección II reconstruye la crítica republicana al control judicial. La Sección III muestra que suscribir una perspectiva republicana no necesariamente lleva a respaldar esta crítica y presenta una defensa del control judicial que se apoya en una concepción republicana de la democracia deliberativa que enfatiza el potencial de esta institución como un mecanismo que sirve para promover la participación política en igualdad de condiciones y que, por tanto, dota al control judicial de una legitimidad democrática participativa. La Sección IV argumenta que la legitimidad democrática participativa del control judicial debe ser vista como un fenómeno gradual cuya fuerza o debilidad relativa depende de las variaciones de las características específicas del contexto institucional donde opera el poder judicial. La Sección V presenta algunas conclusiones.
|
| description_eng |
This paper presents a republican approach to judicial review that is based on a deliberative and participatory interpretation of this institutional arrangement. The paper is divided into five sections, plus an introduction. Section I presents some considerations and clarifications regarding the concept of judicial review and the type of republican political theory that underlies the main arguments. Section II reconstructs the republican critique of judicial review. Section III shows that subscribing to a republican perspective does not necessarily lead to the endorsement of this critique and presents a defense of judicial review that relies on a republican conception of deliberative democracy that stresses the potential of this institution as a mechanism that serves to promote political participation in equal terms and that, thus, imbues judicial review with a participatory democratic legitimacy. Section IV argues that the participatory democratic legitimacy of judicial review should be seen as a gradual phenomenon whose relative strength or weakness depends on the variations of specific characteristics of the institutional context where the judiciary operates. Section V presents some conclusions.
|
| author |
Cortés-Arbeláez, Alejandro |
| author_facet |
Cortés-Arbeláez, Alejandro |
| topicspa_str_mv |
legitimidad participación, democracia, republicanismo, Control judicial, |
| topic |
legitimidad participación, democracia, republicanismo, Control judicial, Judicial review, republicanism, democracy, participation, legitimacy |
| topic_facet |
legitimidad participación, democracia, republicanismo, Control judicial, Judicial review, republicanism, democracy, participation, legitimacy |
| citationissue |
57 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 57 , Año 2023 : Septiembre-Diciembre |
| publisher |
Departamento de Derecho Constitucional |
| ispartofjournal |
Revista Derecho del Estado |
| source |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/8955 |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Alejandro Cortés-Arbeláez - 2023 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. |
| references |
Hübner Mendes, Conrado. Constitutional Courts and Deliberative Democracy. Oxford Constitutional Theory. Oxford University Press, 2013. Mansbridge, Jane, James Bohman, Simone Chambers, Thomas Christiano, Archon Fung, John Parkinson, Dennis Thompson, and Mark Warren. “A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, edited by Jane Mansbridge and John Parkinson, 1–26. Cambridge University Press, 2012. Mansbridge, Jane. “Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, edited by Stephen Macedo, 211–42. Oxford University Press, 1999. Lustig, Doreen, and J. H. H. Weiler. “Judicial Review in the Contemporary World—Retrospective and Prospective.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16(2), 2018, 315–72. Linares, Sebastián. La (i) legitimidad democrática del control judicial de las leyes. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2008. Linares, Sebastián. “Democracia sin atajos: cognitivamente exigente pero participativamente austera.” Revista Derecho del Estado, 55, 2023, 57–85. Linares, Sebastián. Democracia Participativa Epistémica. Filosofía y Derecho. Marcial Pons, 2017. Landau, David, and Rosalind Dixon. “Abusive Judicial Review: Courts Against Democracy.” University of California Davis Law Review, FSU College of Law, Public Law, 53(1313), 2020, 1313–87. Lafont, Cristina. Democracy without Shortcuts. A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2020. Laborde, Cécile, and John Maynor. “The Republican Contribution to Contemporary Political Theory.” In Republicanism and Political Theory, edited by Cécile Laborde and John Maynor, 1–28. Oxford. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing, 2008. Honohan, Iseult. “Republicans, Rights, and Constitutions: Is Judicial Review Compatible with Republican Self-Government?” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009. Martí, José Luis. La República Deliberativa. Una Teoría de la Democracia. Madrid, Barcelona: Marcial Pons, 2006. Hilbink, Lisa. “Assessing the New Constitutionalism.” Comparative Politics, 40(2), 2008), 227–45. Hartmann-Cortés, Kevin, Juan Felipe Herrera, and Gabriel Hernando Angarita. “La ‘Privatización’ de la acción pública de inconstitucionalidad.” Revista Derecho del Estado, 50, 2021, 203–59. Harel, Aron. Why Law Matters. Oxford University Press, 2014. Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Massachusets: The MIT Press, 1996. Goodin, Robert. Innovating Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2008. Ginsburg, Tom, and Mila Versteeg. “Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 30(3), 2014. Ginsburg, Tom, and Tamir Moustafa. “Introduction: The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics.” In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Tom Ginsburg and Tamir Moustafa, 1–22. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Gargarella, Roberto. “Why Do We Care about Dialogue? ‘Notwithstanding Clause’, ‘Meaningful Engagement’ and Public Hearings: A Sympathetic but Critical Analysis.” In The Future of Economic and Social Rights, edited by Katharine G. Young. Globalization and Human Rights. Cambridge University Press, 2019. Ferreres, Víctor. Justicia Constitucional y Democracia. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 1997. Ferejohn, John, and Pasquale Pasquino. “Constitutional Courts as Deliberative Institutions: Toward an Institutional Theory of Constitutional Justice.” In Constitutional justice, east and west, edited by Wojciech Sadurski. Kluwer Law International, 2002. Martí, José Luis. “Is Constitutional Rigidity the Problem? Democratic Legitimacy and the Last Word.” Ratio Juris 27(4), 2014. Martí, José Luis. “The Role of New Technologies in Deliberative Democracy.” In Rule of Law vs Majoritarian Democracy, edited by Giuliano Amato, Benedetta Barbisan, and Cesare Pinelli. Bloomsbury, 2021. Eisgruber, Christopher. Constitutional Self-Government. Harvard University Press, 2001. Waldron, Jeremy. “Judges as Moral Reasoners.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 7(1), 2009, 2–24. Waldron, Jeremy. “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review.” The Yale Law Journal, 2006. Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford University Press, 1999. Waldron, Jeremy. “Judicial Review and Republican Government.” In That Eminent Tribunal. Judicial Supremacy and the Constitution, edited by Christopher Wolfe. New Forum Books, 2004. Waldron, Jeremy. “Five to Four: Why Do Bare Majorities Rule on Courts?” The Yale Law Journal 123, 2014, 1692–1730. Owen, David, and Graham Smith. “Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 23(2), 2015, 213–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12054. Vandamme, Pierre-Étienne, and Donald Bello Hutt. “Selecting Constitutional Judges Randomly.” Swiss Political Science Review, 21(1), 2021, 107–27. Valentini, Chiara. “Deliberative Constitutionalism and Judicial Review.” Revus [Online] 47 (2022). http://journals.openedition.org/revus/8030. Tomkins, Adam. “The Role of the Courts in the Political Constitution.” University of Toronto Law Journal, 60, 2010, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.60.1.1. Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge University Press, 2012. Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press, 1996. Pettit, Philip. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press, 1997. Pettit, Philip. “Keeping Republican Freedom Simple. On a Difference with Quentin Skinner.” Political Theory 30(3), 2002, 339–56. Pettit, Philip. “Depoliticizing Democracy.” Ratio Juris 17(1), 2004, 52–65. Pettit, Philip. “Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory.” Nomos 42, 2000, 105–44. Pettit, Philip. “Civic Republican Political Theory.” In A Political Philosophy in Public Life: Civic Republicanism in Zapatero’s Spain, by Philip Pettit and José Luis Martí. Princeton University Press, 2012. Eylon, Yuval, and Aron Harel. “The Right to Judicial Review.” Virginia Law Review 92, 2006, 991–1022. Estlund, David, and Hélène Landemore. “The Epistemic Value of Democratic Deliberation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by Andre Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren. Oxford University Press, 2018. Dryzek, John S. “Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building.” Comparative Political Studies, 42(11), 2009, 1379–1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332129. Bächtiger, Andre, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren. “Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by Andre Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren, 1–32. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford University Press, 2018. Comparative Constitutions Project. “Replication Data for the Research Paper: Ginsburg, T., & Versteeg, M. Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?” University of Virginia School of Law Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series 2013-29.” Comparative Constitutions Project (blog), 2013. Chambers, Simone. “Citizens Without Robes: On the Deliberative Potential of Everyday Politics.” Journal of Deliberative Democracy 16(2), 2020, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.388. Bickel, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Second Edition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986. Besson, Samantha, and José Luis Martí. “Law and Republicanism: Mapping the Issues.” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009. Bello Hutt, Donald. “The Deliberative Constitutionalism Debate and a Republican Way Forward.” Jurisprudence. An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 12(1), 2020, 69–88. Bello Hutt, Donald. “Measuring Popular and Judicial Deliberation: A Critical Comparison.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16(4), 2018, 1121–47. Bello Hutt, Donald. “Deliberation and Courts: The Role of the Judiciary in a Deliberative System.” Theoria, 64 (3), 2017, 77–103. https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2017.6415204. Bellamy, Richard. Political Constitutionalism. A Republican Defense of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2007. Bellamy, Richard. “The Republic of Reasons: Public Reasoning, Depolitization, and Non-Domination.” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009. Angel-Cabo, Natalia. “The Constitution and the City: Reflections on Judicial Experimentalism Through an Urban Lens.” In European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2020, edited by E. Hirsch Ballin, G. van der Schyff, M. Stremler, and M. De Visser, Vol. 2. European Yearbook of Constitutional Law. The Hague: Asser Press, 2021. Alsina, Victòria, and José Luis Martí. “The Birth of the Crowdlaw Movement: Tech-Based Citizen Participation, Legitimacy and the Quality of Lawmaking.” Analyse & Kritik 40 (2), 2018, 317–38. |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2023-08-30 |
| date_accessioned |
2023-08-30T11:54:52Z |
| date_available |
2023-08-30T11:54:52Z |
| url |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/8955 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n57.03 |
| issn |
0122-9893 |
| eissn |
2346-2051 |
| doi |
10.18601/01229893.n57.03 |
| citationstartpage |
41 |
| citationendpage |
83 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15332 |
| url3_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15333 |
| url4_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15334 |
| _version_ |
1797158318475575296 |