Diferencias de género en estudios experimentales de distribución de recursos con participación de niños

Diferencias de género en estudios experimentales de distribución de recursos con participación de niños

El artículo se encarga de mostrar que los trabajos experimentales que tienen por objeto examinar principios de justicia distributiva en niños pueden ser leídos desde su relación con la variable demográfica género. Al efectuar esta lectura crítica desde una revisión temática se hace posible observar que los estudios, en términos generales, muestran hallazgos en tres direcciones: inexistencia de diferencias de género; diferencias no significativas y diferencias significativas. Estos resultados, sin embargo, se hallan directamente relacionados tanto con las edades de los participantes como con especificidades metodológicas de la experimentación. Con el objeto de dar cuenta de estos aspectos, el texto se ha dividido en tres partes: estudios de... Ver más

Guardado en:

El Ágora USB

1657-8031

2665-3354

Angarita Cáceres, Rafael Gonzalo

UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA

10.21500/16578031.4738

22

2022-08-31

486

508

Colombia

Principios de justicia distributiva, Niños, Diferencias de género, Estudios de primera y tercera persona, Comparaciones culturales

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

El Ágora USB - 2022

id 63793932b1e34408e518f493489686a6
record_format ojs
spelling Diferencias de género en estudios experimentales de distribución de recursos con participación de niños
House, B. R., Silk, J. B., Henrich, J., Barrett, H. C., Scelza, B. A., Boyette, A. H., Hewlettd, B., McElreath, R., Laurence, S. (2013a). Ontogeny of prosocial behavior across diverse societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(36), 14586–14591.doi:10.1073/pnas.1221217110.
Liénard, P., Baumard, N., Mascaro, O., Kiura, P., & Chevallier, C. (2013). Early Understanding of Merit in Turkana Children. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 13(1-2), 57–66. doi:10.1163/15685373-12342084.
Li, Y., Li, H., Decety, J., & Lee, K. (2013). Experiencing a natural disaster alters children’s altruistic giving. Psychological Science, 24 (9), 1686–1695. doi:10.1177/09567976 13479975.
Killen, M., Lee-Kim, J., McGlothlin, H., & Stangor, C. (2002). How children and adolescents evaluate gender and racial exclusion. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67(4, Serial No. 271). Knutsson, M., Martinsson, P., Persson, E., & Wollbrant, C. (2019). Gender differences in altruism: Evidence from a natural field experiment on matched donations. Economics Letters, 176, 47–50. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2018.12.029.
Kienbaum, J., & Wilkening, F. (2009). Children’s and adolescents’ intuitive judgements about distributive justice: Integrating need, effort, and luck. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6(4), 481–498.doi:10.1080/17405620701497299.
Kidd, C., Palmeri, H., & Aslin, R. N. (2013). Rational snacking: Young children’s decision-making on the marshmallow task is moderated by beliefs about environmental reliability. Cognition, 126(1), 109–114. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.004.
Jennings, A. B. (2019). I’ll share with her, but not with you: A mixed methods approach to investigating children’s naïve theories about resource allocation decisions. International Review of Economics Education, 100162. doi:10.1016/j.iree.2019.100162.
House, B., Henrich, J., Sarnecka, B., & Silk, J. B. (2013b). The development of contingent reciprocity in children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 86–93. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.10.001.
House, B. R., Henrich, J., Brosnan, S. F., & Silk, J. B. (2012). The ontogeny of human prosociality: behavioral experiments with children aged 3 to 8. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(4), 291–308. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.10.007.
Holst, C. (2019). Global Gender Justice: Distributive Justice or Participatory Parity? SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3355607.
McAuliffe, K., Blake, P. R., Kim, G., Wrangham, R. W., & Warneken, F. (2013). Social Influences on Inequity Aversion in Children. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e80966. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080966. McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A. V., Daly, M., & Neal, A. (2006). Children’s distributive Justice judgments: Aversive racism in Euro-American children? Child Development, 77, 1063 – 1080. doi: 10.1111 / j.1467-8624.2006.00919.x McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A. V., Watkins, C., & Vinchur, A. J. (1994). The effect of relationship on children’s distributive justice reasoning. Child Development, 65, 1694 – 1700. doi:10.2307/1131288.
Hill, K., & Gurven, M. (2004). Economic experiments to examine fairness and cooperation among the Ache Indians of Paraguay. In J. Henrich, R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, H. Gintis, & E. Fehr (Eds.), Foundations in human sociality: Experiments and ethnography in 15 small-scale societies (pp. 382 – 412). Oxford7 Oxford University Press.
Henrich, J., Ensminger, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J., Gurven, M., Gwako, E., Henrich, N., Lesorogol, C., Marlowe, F., Tracer, D. and Ziker, J. (2010). Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science 327, 1480-1484.
Harbaugh, W., & Krause, K. (2000). Children’s altruism in public good and dictator experiments. Economic Inquiry, 38(1), 95–109. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2000.tb00006.x.
Gruen, R. L., Esfand, S. M., & Kibbe, M. M. (2019). Altruistic self-regulation in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104700. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104700.
Gheaus, A. (2016). “Gender and Distributive Justice”, en: Olsaretti, S. (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, Harvard, University Press.
Fehr, E., Glätzle-Rützler, D. & Sutter, M. (2013). The development of egalitarianism, altruism, spite and parochialism in childhood and adolescence. Eur. Econ. Rev. 64, 369–383.
Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454(7208), 1079–1083. doi:10.1038/nature07155.
Engelmann, J. M., & Tomasello, M. (2019). Children’s Sense of Fairness as Equal Respect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.001.
Elenbaas, L., & Killen, M. (2016). How do young children expect others to address resource inequalities between groups? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150, 72–86. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.05.002
Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45(4), 513–520. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.45.4.513. Martinsson, P., Nordblom, K., Rützler, D., & Sutter, M. (2011). Social preferences during childhood and the role of gender and age — An experiment in Austria and Sweden. Economics Letters, 110(3), 248–251. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2010.11.028.
McGlothlin, H., Killen, M., & Edmonds, C. (2005). European-American children’s intergroup attitudes about peer relationships. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,23, 227 – 249.
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1998). Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator experiments. Economic Journal, 108, 726 – 735.
Stewart, S. M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2000). Influences on Children’s Sharing in a Multicultural Setting. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(3), 333–348. doi:10.1177/0022022100031003003.
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Underwood, B. & Moore, B. (1982). ‘‘The Generality of Altruism in Children,’’ in: The Development of Prosocial Behavior. Eisenberg, N. (Ed). New York: Academic Press, 1982, 25-52.
Thompson C, Barresi J., y Moore C. (1997). The development of future-oriented prudence and altruism in preschoolers. Cogn Dev 12(2):199–212.
Selten, R. and Ockenfels, A. (1998). An Experimental Solidarity Game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34(4): 517–39. Smith, C., & Warneken, F. (2016). Children’s reasoning about distributive and retributive justice across development. Developmental Psychology, 52(4), 613–628. doi:10.1037/a0040069.
Meuwese, R., Crone, E. A., de Rooij, M., & Güroğlu, B. (2014). Development of Equity Preferences in Boys and Girls Across Adolescence. Child Development, 86(1), 145–158. doi:10.1111/cdev.12290.
Rochat, P., Dias, M. D. G., Guo Liping, Broesch, T., Passos-Ferreira, C., Winning, A., & Berg, B. (2009). Fairness in Distributive Justice by 3- and 5-Year-Olds Across Seven Cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(3), 416–442.doi:10.1177/0022022109332844. Samek, A., Cowell, J. M., Cappelen, A. W., Cheng, Y., Contreras-Ibáñez, C., Gomez-Sicard, N., … Decety, J. (2020). The development of social comparisons and sharing behavior across 12 countries. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 192, 104778. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104778.
Rochat, P. (2005). Humans evolved to become Homo Negotiatus . . . the rest followed. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 714-715.
Robbins, E., Starr, S., & Rochat, P. (2015). Fairness and Distributive Justice by 3- to 5-Year-Old Tibetan Children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(3), 333–340. doi:10.1177/0022022115620487.
Pilgrim, C., & Rueda-Riedle, A. (2002). The importance of social context in cross-cultural comparisons: First graders in Columbia and the United States. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(3), 283-295.
Paulus, M., & Moore, C. (2014). The development of recipient-dependent sharing behavior and expectations about other people’s sharing in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 50, 914–921. doi:10.1037/a0034169
Noh, J. Y., D’Esterre, A., & Killen, M. (2019). Effort or outcome? Children’s meritorious decisions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 178, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.005.
Noh, J. Y. (2019). Children’s Developing Understanding of Merit in a Distributive Justice Context. Journal of Child and family studies. Doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01606-2.
Mischel, W. (1974). “Processes in delay of gratification”. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 7 (pp. 249-292). New York: Academic Press. Mischel, W., & Metzner, R. (1962). Preference for delayed reward as a function of age, intelligence, and length of delay interval. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64(6), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045046.
Michalska, K.J., Kinzler, K.D., & Decety, J. (2013). Age-related sex differences in explicit measures of empathy do not predict brain responses. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 22–32.
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2001). Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry, 39, 171 – 188.
Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and Helping Behavior. A Meta-Analytic Review of the Social Psychological Literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 283-308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283.
Dufwenberg, M., and Muren, A. (2006). Gender Composition in Teams. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 61(1): 50–54.
application/pdf
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
El Ágora USB - 2022
Español
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Agora/article/view/4738
El Ágora USB
Universidad San Buenaventura
Artículo de revista
Amrhein, V., & Greenland, S. (2017). Remove, rather than redefine, statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 4–4. doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0224-0.
Núm. 1 , Año 2022 : Enero - Junio
1
22
Principios de justicia distributiva, Niños, Diferencias de género, Estudios de primera y tercera persona, Comparaciones culturales
Angarita Cáceres, Rafael Gonzalo
El artículo se encarga de mostrar que los trabajos experimentales que tienen por objeto examinar principios de justicia distributiva en niños pueden ser leídos desde su relación con la variable demográfica género. Al efectuar esta lectura crítica desde una revisión temática se hace posible observar que los estudios, en términos generales, muestran hallazgos en tres direcciones: inexistencia de diferencias de género; diferencias no significativas y diferencias significativas. Estos resultados, sin embargo, se hallan directamente relacionados tanto con las edades de los participantes como con especificidades metodológicas de la experimentación. Con el objeto de dar cuenta de estos aspectos, el texto se ha dividido en tres partes: estudios de primera persona, trabajos de tercera persona y comparaciones culturales.
Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., Sorensen, E. O., & Tungodden, B. (2010). Fairness and the Development of Inequality Acceptance. Science, 328(5982), 1176–1178. doi:10.1126/science.1187300.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., & McShane, B. (2019). Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature, 567(7748), 305–307. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9.
Charness, G. & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests.Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 817–869.
Dickinson, D. and Tiefenthaler, J. (2002). What Is Fair? Experimental Evidence. Southern Economic Journal, 69(2): 414–28.
Decety, J., Michalska, K.J., & Kinzler, K.D. (2012). The contribution of emotion and cognition to moral sensitivity: a neurodevelopmental study. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 209–220.
Debove, S., Baumard, N., & André, J.-B. (2017). On the evolutionary origins of equity. PLOS ONE, 12(3), e0173636. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173636.
Cowell, J.M., & Decety, J. (2015). The neuroscience of implicit moral evaluation and its relation to generosity in early childhood. Current Biology, 25, 1–5.
Cowell, J. M., Lee, K., Malcolm-Smith, S., Selcuk, B., Zhou, X., & Decety, J. (2016). The development of generosity and moral cognition across five cultures. Developmental Science, 20(4), e12403. doi:10.1111/desc.12403.
Christensen, J. F., Flexas, A., Calabrese, M., Gut, N. K., & Gomila, A. (2014). Moral judgment reloaded: a moral dilemma validation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5: 607.doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00607.
Choi, J. K. & Bowles, S. (2007) The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science 318, 636–640.
Andreoni, J. & Miller, J. (1998). Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Study of Rationality and Altruism. Social Systems Research Institute Working Paper 9902, University of Wisconsin. Andreoni, J. & Vesterlund, L. (2001). Which Is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1): 293–312.
Chernyak, N., Sandham, B., Harris, P. L., & Cordes, S. (2016). Numerical cognition explains age-related changes in third-party fairness. Developmental Psychology, 52(10), 1555-1562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000196.
Chevallier, C., Xu, J., Adachi, K., van der Henst, J-B., Baumard. N. (2015). Preschoolers’ Understanding of Merit in Two Asian Societies. PLOS ONE 10(5): e0114717. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114717.
Publication
Benjamin, D.J., Berger, J.O., Johannesson, M. et al. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nat Hum Behav 2, 6–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z.
Baumard, N., Mascaro, O., & Chevallier, C. (2012). Preschoolers are able to take merit into account when distributing goods. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 492-498.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026598.
Callaghan, T., & Corbit, J. (2018). Early prosocial development across cultures. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 102–106. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.039.
Caleo, S. (2018). When distributive justice and gender stereotypes coincide: Reactions to equity and equality violations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(5), 257–268. doi:10.1111/jasp.12510.
Journal article
Gender differences in experimental studies of resource allowed with the participation of children
Principles of distributive justice, children, gender differences, first-party and third-party studies, cultural comparisons
The article pretends to demonstrate that experimental works that has as a main object to examine the principles of distributive justice in children can be read from their relation with the gender demographic variable. When this critical reading is done from a thematic review it is possible to observe that those studies, in general terms, show findings in three directions: the absence of gender differentiation, non-significant differences and significant differences. These results, however, are directly linked to the participants’ age and to specificities of the experiment methodologies. To give an account of these aspects, the text has been divided in three parts: first-party studies, third-party studies and cultural comparisons.
2022-08-31
2022-08-31T19:28:21Z
2022-08-31T19:28:21Z
https://doi.org/10.21500/16578031.4738
2665-3354
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Agora/article/download/4738/4728
10.21500/16578031.4738
486
508
1657-8031
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection El Ágora USB
title Diferencias de género en estudios experimentales de distribución de recursos con participación de niños
spellingShingle Diferencias de género en estudios experimentales de distribución de recursos con participación de niños
Angarita Cáceres, Rafael Gonzalo
Principios de justicia distributiva, Niños, Diferencias de género, Estudios de primera y tercera persona, Comparaciones culturales
Principles of distributive justice, children, gender differences, first-party and third-party studies, cultural comparisons
title_short Diferencias de género en estudios experimentales de distribución de recursos con participación de niños
title_full Diferencias de género en estudios experimentales de distribución de recursos con participación de niños
title_fullStr Diferencias de género en estudios experimentales de distribución de recursos con participación de niños
title_full_unstemmed Diferencias de género en estudios experimentales de distribución de recursos con participación de niños
title_sort diferencias de género en estudios experimentales de distribución de recursos con participación de niños
title_eng Gender differences in experimental studies of resource allowed with the participation of children
description El artículo se encarga de mostrar que los trabajos experimentales que tienen por objeto examinar principios de justicia distributiva en niños pueden ser leídos desde su relación con la variable demográfica género. Al efectuar esta lectura crítica desde una revisión temática se hace posible observar que los estudios, en términos generales, muestran hallazgos en tres direcciones: inexistencia de diferencias de género; diferencias no significativas y diferencias significativas. Estos resultados, sin embargo, se hallan directamente relacionados tanto con las edades de los participantes como con especificidades metodológicas de la experimentación. Con el objeto de dar cuenta de estos aspectos, el texto se ha dividido en tres partes: estudios de primera persona, trabajos de tercera persona y comparaciones culturales.
description_eng The article pretends to demonstrate that experimental works that has as a main object to examine the principles of distributive justice in children can be read from their relation with the gender demographic variable. When this critical reading is done from a thematic review it is possible to observe that those studies, in general terms, show findings in three directions: the absence of gender differentiation, non-significant differences and significant differences. These results, however, are directly linked to the participants’ age and to specificities of the experiment methodologies. To give an account of these aspects, the text has been divided in three parts: first-party studies, third-party studies and cultural comparisons.
author Angarita Cáceres, Rafael Gonzalo
author_facet Angarita Cáceres, Rafael Gonzalo
topicspa_str_mv Principios de justicia distributiva, Niños, Diferencias de género, Estudios de primera y tercera persona, Comparaciones culturales
topic Principios de justicia distributiva, Niños, Diferencias de género, Estudios de primera y tercera persona, Comparaciones culturales
Principles of distributive justice, children, gender differences, first-party and third-party studies, cultural comparisons
topic_facet Principios de justicia distributiva, Niños, Diferencias de género, Estudios de primera y tercera persona, Comparaciones culturales
Principles of distributive justice, children, gender differences, first-party and third-party studies, cultural comparisons
citationvolume 22
citationissue 1
citationedition Núm. 1 , Año 2022 : Enero - Junio
publisher Universidad San Buenaventura
ispartofjournal El Ágora USB
source https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Agora/article/view/4738
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
El Ágora USB - 2022
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
references House, B. R., Silk, J. B., Henrich, J., Barrett, H. C., Scelza, B. A., Boyette, A. H., Hewlettd, B., McElreath, R., Laurence, S. (2013a). Ontogeny of prosocial behavior across diverse societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(36), 14586–14591.doi:10.1073/pnas.1221217110.
Liénard, P., Baumard, N., Mascaro, O., Kiura, P., & Chevallier, C. (2013). Early Understanding of Merit in Turkana Children. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 13(1-2), 57–66. doi:10.1163/15685373-12342084.
Li, Y., Li, H., Decety, J., & Lee, K. (2013). Experiencing a natural disaster alters children’s altruistic giving. Psychological Science, 24 (9), 1686–1695. doi:10.1177/09567976 13479975.
Killen, M., Lee-Kim, J., McGlothlin, H., & Stangor, C. (2002). How children and adolescents evaluate gender and racial exclusion. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67(4, Serial No. 271). Knutsson, M., Martinsson, P., Persson, E., & Wollbrant, C. (2019). Gender differences in altruism: Evidence from a natural field experiment on matched donations. Economics Letters, 176, 47–50. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2018.12.029.
Kienbaum, J., & Wilkening, F. (2009). Children’s and adolescents’ intuitive judgements about distributive justice: Integrating need, effort, and luck. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6(4), 481–498.doi:10.1080/17405620701497299.
Kidd, C., Palmeri, H., & Aslin, R. N. (2013). Rational snacking: Young children’s decision-making on the marshmallow task is moderated by beliefs about environmental reliability. Cognition, 126(1), 109–114. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.004.
Jennings, A. B. (2019). I’ll share with her, but not with you: A mixed methods approach to investigating children’s naïve theories about resource allocation decisions. International Review of Economics Education, 100162. doi:10.1016/j.iree.2019.100162.
House, B., Henrich, J., Sarnecka, B., & Silk, J. B. (2013b). The development of contingent reciprocity in children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 86–93. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.10.001.
House, B. R., Henrich, J., Brosnan, S. F., & Silk, J. B. (2012). The ontogeny of human prosociality: behavioral experiments with children aged 3 to 8. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(4), 291–308. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.10.007.
Holst, C. (2019). Global Gender Justice: Distributive Justice or Participatory Parity? SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3355607.
McAuliffe, K., Blake, P. R., Kim, G., Wrangham, R. W., & Warneken, F. (2013). Social Influences on Inequity Aversion in Children. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e80966. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080966. McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A. V., Daly, M., & Neal, A. (2006). Children’s distributive Justice judgments: Aversive racism in Euro-American children? Child Development, 77, 1063 – 1080. doi: 10.1111 / j.1467-8624.2006.00919.x McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A. V., Watkins, C., & Vinchur, A. J. (1994). The effect of relationship on children’s distributive justice reasoning. Child Development, 65, 1694 – 1700. doi:10.2307/1131288.
Hill, K., & Gurven, M. (2004). Economic experiments to examine fairness and cooperation among the Ache Indians of Paraguay. In J. Henrich, R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, H. Gintis, & E. Fehr (Eds.), Foundations in human sociality: Experiments and ethnography in 15 small-scale societies (pp. 382 – 412). Oxford7 Oxford University Press.
Henrich, J., Ensminger, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J., Gurven, M., Gwako, E., Henrich, N., Lesorogol, C., Marlowe, F., Tracer, D. and Ziker, J. (2010). Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science 327, 1480-1484.
Harbaugh, W., & Krause, K. (2000). Children’s altruism in public good and dictator experiments. Economic Inquiry, 38(1), 95–109. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2000.tb00006.x.
Gruen, R. L., Esfand, S. M., & Kibbe, M. M. (2019). Altruistic self-regulation in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104700. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104700.
Gheaus, A. (2016). “Gender and Distributive Justice”, en: Olsaretti, S. (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, Harvard, University Press.
Fehr, E., Glätzle-Rützler, D. & Sutter, M. (2013). The development of egalitarianism, altruism, spite and parochialism in childhood and adolescence. Eur. Econ. Rev. 64, 369–383.
Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454(7208), 1079–1083. doi:10.1038/nature07155.
Engelmann, J. M., & Tomasello, M. (2019). Children’s Sense of Fairness as Equal Respect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.001.
Elenbaas, L., & Killen, M. (2016). How do young children expect others to address resource inequalities between groups? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150, 72–86. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.05.002
Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45(4), 513–520. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.45.4.513. Martinsson, P., Nordblom, K., Rützler, D., & Sutter, M. (2011). Social preferences during childhood and the role of gender and age — An experiment in Austria and Sweden. Economics Letters, 110(3), 248–251. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2010.11.028.
McGlothlin, H., Killen, M., & Edmonds, C. (2005). European-American children’s intergroup attitudes about peer relationships. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,23, 227 – 249.
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1998). Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator experiments. Economic Journal, 108, 726 – 735.
Stewart, S. M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2000). Influences on Children’s Sharing in a Multicultural Setting. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(3), 333–348. doi:10.1177/0022022100031003003.
Underwood, B. & Moore, B. (1982). ‘‘The Generality of Altruism in Children,’’ in: The Development of Prosocial Behavior. Eisenberg, N. (Ed). New York: Academic Press, 1982, 25-52.
Thompson C, Barresi J., y Moore C. (1997). The development of future-oriented prudence and altruism in preschoolers. Cogn Dev 12(2):199–212.
Selten, R. and Ockenfels, A. (1998). An Experimental Solidarity Game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34(4): 517–39. Smith, C., & Warneken, F. (2016). Children’s reasoning about distributive and retributive justice across development. Developmental Psychology, 52(4), 613–628. doi:10.1037/a0040069.
Meuwese, R., Crone, E. A., de Rooij, M., & Güroğlu, B. (2014). Development of Equity Preferences in Boys and Girls Across Adolescence. Child Development, 86(1), 145–158. doi:10.1111/cdev.12290.
Rochat, P., Dias, M. D. G., Guo Liping, Broesch, T., Passos-Ferreira, C., Winning, A., & Berg, B. (2009). Fairness in Distributive Justice by 3- and 5-Year-Olds Across Seven Cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(3), 416–442.doi:10.1177/0022022109332844. Samek, A., Cowell, J. M., Cappelen, A. W., Cheng, Y., Contreras-Ibáñez, C., Gomez-Sicard, N., … Decety, J. (2020). The development of social comparisons and sharing behavior across 12 countries. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 192, 104778. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104778.
Rochat, P. (2005). Humans evolved to become Homo Negotiatus . . . the rest followed. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 714-715.
Robbins, E., Starr, S., & Rochat, P. (2015). Fairness and Distributive Justice by 3- to 5-Year-Old Tibetan Children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(3), 333–340. doi:10.1177/0022022115620487.
Pilgrim, C., & Rueda-Riedle, A. (2002). The importance of social context in cross-cultural comparisons: First graders in Columbia and the United States. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(3), 283-295.
Paulus, M., & Moore, C. (2014). The development of recipient-dependent sharing behavior and expectations about other people’s sharing in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 50, 914–921. doi:10.1037/a0034169
Noh, J. Y., D’Esterre, A., & Killen, M. (2019). Effort or outcome? Children’s meritorious decisions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 178, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.005.
Noh, J. Y. (2019). Children’s Developing Understanding of Merit in a Distributive Justice Context. Journal of Child and family studies. Doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01606-2.
Mischel, W. (1974). “Processes in delay of gratification”. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 7 (pp. 249-292). New York: Academic Press. Mischel, W., & Metzner, R. (1962). Preference for delayed reward as a function of age, intelligence, and length of delay interval. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64(6), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045046.
Michalska, K.J., Kinzler, K.D., & Decety, J. (2013). Age-related sex differences in explicit measures of empathy do not predict brain responses. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 22–32.
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2001). Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry, 39, 171 – 188.
Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and Helping Behavior. A Meta-Analytic Review of the Social Psychological Literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 283-308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283.
Dufwenberg, M., and Muren, A. (2006). Gender Composition in Teams. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 61(1): 50–54.
Amrhein, V., & Greenland, S. (2017). Remove, rather than redefine, statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 4–4. doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0224-0.
Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., Sorensen, E. O., & Tungodden, B. (2010). Fairness and the Development of Inequality Acceptance. Science, 328(5982), 1176–1178. doi:10.1126/science.1187300.
Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., & McShane, B. (2019). Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature, 567(7748), 305–307. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9.
Charness, G. & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests.Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 817–869.
Dickinson, D. and Tiefenthaler, J. (2002). What Is Fair? Experimental Evidence. Southern Economic Journal, 69(2): 414–28.
Decety, J., Michalska, K.J., & Kinzler, K.D. (2012). The contribution of emotion and cognition to moral sensitivity: a neurodevelopmental study. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 209–220.
Debove, S., Baumard, N., & André, J.-B. (2017). On the evolutionary origins of equity. PLOS ONE, 12(3), e0173636. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173636.
Cowell, J.M., & Decety, J. (2015). The neuroscience of implicit moral evaluation and its relation to generosity in early childhood. Current Biology, 25, 1–5.
Cowell, J. M., Lee, K., Malcolm-Smith, S., Selcuk, B., Zhou, X., & Decety, J. (2016). The development of generosity and moral cognition across five cultures. Developmental Science, 20(4), e12403. doi:10.1111/desc.12403.
Christensen, J. F., Flexas, A., Calabrese, M., Gut, N. K., & Gomila, A. (2014). Moral judgment reloaded: a moral dilemma validation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5: 607.doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00607.
Choi, J. K. & Bowles, S. (2007) The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science 318, 636–640.
Andreoni, J. & Miller, J. (1998). Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Study of Rationality and Altruism. Social Systems Research Institute Working Paper 9902, University of Wisconsin. Andreoni, J. & Vesterlund, L. (2001). Which Is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1): 293–312.
Chernyak, N., Sandham, B., Harris, P. L., & Cordes, S. (2016). Numerical cognition explains age-related changes in third-party fairness. Developmental Psychology, 52(10), 1555-1562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000196.
Chevallier, C., Xu, J., Adachi, K., van der Henst, J-B., Baumard. N. (2015). Preschoolers’ Understanding of Merit in Two Asian Societies. PLOS ONE 10(5): e0114717. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114717.
Benjamin, D.J., Berger, J.O., Johannesson, M. et al. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nat Hum Behav 2, 6–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z.
Baumard, N., Mascaro, O., & Chevallier, C. (2012). Preschoolers are able to take merit into account when distributing goods. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 492-498.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026598.
Callaghan, T., & Corbit, J. (2018). Early prosocial development across cultures. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 102–106. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.039.
Caleo, S. (2018). When distributive justice and gender stereotypes coincide: Reactions to equity and equality violations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(5), 257–268. doi:10.1111/jasp.12510.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2022-08-31
date_accessioned 2022-08-31T19:28:21Z
date_available 2022-08-31T19:28:21Z
url https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Agora/article/view/4738
url_doi https://doi.org/10.21500/16578031.4738
issn 1657-8031
eissn 2665-3354
doi 10.21500/16578031.4738
citationstartpage 486
citationendpage 508
url2_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Agora/article/download/4738/4728
_version_ 1797160126832967680

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares