Propiedades de las representaciones en diseño : una exploración interdisciplinaria de su rol funcional.

Propiedades de las representaciones en diseño : una exploración interdisciplinaria de su rol funcional.

Un repertorio interdisciplinario de las propiedades de las representaciones externas en diseño, tales como los sketches, es propuesto para explorar el rol funcional de dichas representaciones. Las propiedades y las funciones de las representaciones son múltiples. Sin embargo, invariablemente se estudian desde enfoques cognitivos o de diseño computacional, por lo que ciertos fenómenos, importantes para diferentes disciplinas del diseño, quedan por fuera. Consecuentemente, una revisión interdisciplinaria, documental, descriptiva y explicativa de la literatura se usa para aportar elementos de respuesta alrededor de tres preguntas: ¿qué son las representaciones, en ciencias duras y en diseño? ¿Cuáles son sus propiedades? ¿Y sus funciones? Así,... Ver más

Guardado en:

Kepes

1794-7111

2462-8115

Patiño Mazo, Ever

Maya, Jorge

UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS

10.17151/kepes.2020.17.21.2

17

2020-01-01

17

60

Colombia

sketch

representación externa

representación

diseño y cognición

diseño e interdisciplinaridad

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Jorge Maya - 0

id 544d5c27a6b23fd4807375a7d401a7e2
record_format ojs
spelling Propiedades de las representaciones en diseño : una exploración interdisciplinaria de su rol funcional.
Olofsson, E., and Sjolen, K. (2005). Design Sketching, KEEOS Design-Books.
Schifferstein, H.N., and Hekkert, P. (eds.) (2008). Product Experience. Elsevier.
Schenk, P. (2007). Developing a taxonomy on drawing for design. En: Poggenpohl, s. (ed.) Proceedings IASDR’07 Conference, Hong-Kong, 12-15 Nov., 2007
Runco, M.A., and Pritzker, S.R. (1999). Encyclopedia of Creativity. (2 Vols.). Academic Press.
Runco, M.A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier.
Roozenburg, N.F., and Eekels, J. (1995). Product design: fundamentals and methods (Vol. 2). Wiley, Chichester.
Reymen, I., and Hammer, D. (2000). Design method supporting regular reflection on design situations. En: Horvath, I., Medland, A.J., and Vergeest, J.S.M. (eds.). Proceedings Third Symposium TMCE, Delft, pp.18-21.
Reisberg, D., and Logie, R. (1993) The ins and outs of working memory: Overcoming the limits on learning from imagery, en: Roskos-Ewoldsen, Intons-Peterson M., Anderson, R. (eds). Imagery, Creativity and Discovery: a cognitive approach, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 39-76
Ramachandran, V.S. (2011). The Tell-Tale Brain. W.W. Norton-Company.
Petiot, J.F. and Yannou, B. (2004). Measuring consumer perceptions for a better comprehension, specification and assessment of product semantics. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 33 (6), 507-525. doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2003.12.004
Perini, L. (2004). Convention, resemblance and isomorphism: understanding scientific visual representations, chapter 3, en: Malcolm, G. (2004).
Pellegrino J.W., Rosinski, R.R., Chiesi, H.L., and Siegel, A. (1977). Picture–word differences in decision latency: an analysis of single and dual memorymodels. Memory and Cognition, 5, 383-396. doi.org/10.3758/BF03197377
Pei, E., Campbell, I., and Evans, M.A. (2009). Building a Common Ground-The Use of Design Representation Cards for Enhancing Collaboration between Industrial Designers and Engineering Designers. En: Durling, D., Rust, C., Chen, L.-L., Ashton, P., & Friedman, K. (eds.). Proceedings Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference 2008, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK, 16-19 July 2008.
Pahl, G., Beitz, P., and Grote, K.H. (2007). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer. Pei, E. (2013). Building a common language of design representations for industrial designers and engineering designers. PhD Thesis, Loughborough University.
Otto, K.N., and Wood, K.L. (2000). Product Design. Pearson.
Novick, L.R. (2005). Problem solving, Psychology of. En: Nadel (2005).
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How practitioners think in action. London: Temple-Smith. Schön, D., and Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing, Design Studies, 13(2), 135-153. doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(92)90268-F
Ngo, D.C.L., and Byrne, J.G. (1998). Aesthetic measures for screen design. En: Calderon, P.B. & Thomas, B. (eds.) Proceedings 1998 Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference, Adelaide (pp. 64-71).
Nadel, L. (Ed.). (2005). Encyclopedia of cognitive science. Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.1002/0470018860 Nefs, H.T. (2008). On the visual appearance of Objects. En: Schifferstein & Hekkert (2008).
Mogford, R.H., Guttman, J., Morrow, S., and Kopardekar, P. (1995). The Complexity Construct in Air Traffic Control: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Technical Report, CTA.
Menezes, A., and Lawson, B. (2006). How designers perceive sketches. Design Studies, 27(5), 571-585. doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.02.001
Massironi, M. (2001). The psychology of graphic images: Seeing, drawing, communicating. Psychology Press.
Markman, A.B. (2005). Representation Formats in Psychology. En: Nadel (2005). doi.org/10.1002/0470018860.s00608
Marin, M. and Leder, H. (2013). Examining Complexity across Domains: Relating Subjective and Objective Measures of Affective Environmental Scenes, Paintings and Music. PloS one, 8(8), e72412. Public Library of Science.
Malhotra, N.K. (1996). Marketing Research, An applied Orientation. PrenticeHall.
Malcolm, G. (2004). Multidisciplinary approaches to visual representations and interpretations (Vol. 2). Elsevier.
Lloyd, P., and Snelders, D. (2003). What was Philippe Starck thinking of? Design Studies, 24(3), 237-253. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00054-6Get
Levinson, J. (2005). Philosophical Aesthetics: An overview. En: Levinson, J. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Leborg, C. (2006). Visual Grammar. Princeton Architectural Press.
Kulkarni, S., Summers, J.D., Vargas-Hernandez, N., and Shah, J.J. (2000). Collaborative Sketching (CoSketch) — An Idea Generation Technique for Engineering Design. Journal of Creative Behavior. 35 (3), 168-198. doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01045.x
Itti, L., Koch, C. and Niebur, E. (1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 20(11), 1254-1259. DOI: 10.1109/34.730558
Schneider, W., and Shiffrin, R.M. (1977). “Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention”. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1-66. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1.
Seifert, C.M. (2001). Situated cognition and Learning, en: Wilson y Keil (2001).
Hekkert, P. and Leder, H. (2008). Product Aesthetics. En: Schifferstein, H.N. & Hekkert, P. (eds.) (2008). Product experience (pp. 259-285). Elsevier, San Diego, CA.
Visser, W. (2010). Design as construction of representations. Art + Design, Psychology, (2), 29-43.
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Zhao, H., Chen, J., Han, Y. and Cao, X. (2014). Image aesthetics enhancement using composition-based saliency detection. Multimedia Systems, 1-10. Springer. doi.org/10.1007/s00530-014-0373-1
Xing, J. and Manning, C.A. (2005). Complexity and Automation Displays of Air Traffic Control: Literature review and analysis. Technical Report, Office of Aerospace Medicine Washington, DC.
Wong, W. (1993). Principles of form and design. John Wiley & Sons.
Wilson, R.A., and Keil, F.C. (Eds.) (2001). The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. The MIT Press.
Wallschlaeger, C., Busic-Snyder, C. and Morgan, M. (1992). Basic visual concepts and principles for artists, architects, and designers. McGraw-Hill.
Von Foerster, H. (1996). Visión y conocimiento: disfunciones de segundo orden. En: Prigogine y Fried-Schnitman. Nuevos paradigmas, cultura y subjetividad. Paidós.
Von Eckardt, B. (1999). Mental representation. En: Wilson, R.A. and Kiel, F.C. (Eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Sciences (pp. 527–529).
Visser, W. (2007). Conception individuelle et collective. Approche de l’ergonomie cognitive. arXiv Preprint arXiv:0711.1290.
Self, J., Lee, S., and Bang, H. (2015). Perceptions of complexity in design representation: Implications for an understanding of design practice. The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice, 9 (4), 33-46.
Ulrich, K.T., and Eppinger, S.D. (1995). Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, NY.
Tversky, B. (2011). Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3 (3), 499- 535. doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01113.x
Tjalve, E. (1979). A short course in industrial design. Newnes-Butterworths, London.
Tinio, P.L., and Smith, J.K. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts. Cambridge University Press.
Suwa, M., Gero, J., and Purcell, T. (2000). Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: important vehicles for a design process.Design Studies, 21 (6), 539-567. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00034-4
Suh, N.P. (1995). Axiomatic design of mechanical systems. Journal of Mechanical Design, 117 (B)2-10. doi:10.1115/1.2836467
Sternnber, R.J., and Ben-Zeev, T. (2001). Complex Cognition. Oxford University Press.
Söderman, M. (2002). Comparing Desktop Virtual Reality with handmade sketches and real products: Exploring key aspects for end-users' understanding of proposed products. Journal of Design Research (2) 1. doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2002.009817
Snodgrass, J.G. (2005). Representations, Abstract and Concrete, en: Nadel (2005).
Smith, S.M., Ward, T.B., and Finke, R.A. (1995). The creative cognition approach. MIT Press.
Smith, C.S. (1982). A Search for Structure. Selected Essays in Science, Art and History. MIT Press.
Singer, J.L. (1999) Imagination, en: Runco y Pritzker, (1999). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier.
Shah, J.J., Smith, S.M., and Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design studies, 24 (2),111-134. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00034-0
Shah, J.J., Kulkarni, S.V., and Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2000). Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: effectiveness metrics and design of experiments. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122 (4), 377-384.doi:10.1115/1.1315592
Hutchinson, J.W., and Alba, J.W. (1991). Ignoring irrelevant information: Situational determinants of consumer learning. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 325-345. doi.org/10.1086/209263
Hekkert, P. (2015). Aesthetic responses to design: a battle of impulses. En: Tinio, Smith (2015).
Publication
Artículo de revista
Berghman, M. and Hekkert, P. (2017). Towards a unified model of aesthetic pleasure in design. New Ideas in Psychology, 47, 136-144. doi. org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.03.004
Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. University of California Press.
Akner-Koler, C. (2007). Form & formlessness: questioning aesthetic abstractions through art projects, cross-disciplinary studies and product design education. Axl Books.
Jorge Maya - 0
Grignon, M. (2000). Deux brouillons: Le croquis et la maquette. En: Genesis (14): Architecture, edited by P-M de-Biasi, Legault. Montreal: Centre Canadien d’Architecture/Jean-Michel Place, pp 153-162.
Español
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/2334
Kepes
Universidad de Caldas
application/pdf
Núm. 21 , Año 2020 : Enero - Junio
Brereton, M. (2004). Distributed Cognition in Engineering Design: Negotiating between Abstract and Material Representations. En: Goldschmidt y Porter (2004). Design Representation. London: Springer.
21
17
sketch
representación externa
representación
diseño y cognición
diseño e interdisciplinaridad
Patiño Mazo, Ever
Maya, Jorge
Un repertorio interdisciplinario de las propiedades de las representaciones externas en diseño, tales como los sketches, es propuesto para explorar el rol funcional de dichas representaciones. Las propiedades y las funciones de las representaciones son múltiples. Sin embargo, invariablemente se estudian desde enfoques cognitivos o de diseño computacional, por lo que ciertos fenómenos, importantes para diferentes disciplinas del diseño, quedan por fuera. Consecuentemente, una revisión interdisciplinaria, documental, descriptiva y explicativa de la literatura se usa para aportar elementos de respuesta alrededor de tres preguntas: ¿qué son las representaciones, en ciencias duras y en diseño? ¿Cuáles son sus propiedades? ¿Y sus funciones? Así, primero, establecemos entonces elementos básicos sobre las representaciones en diseño; segundo, construimos un repertorio de las propiedades con un enfoque interdisciplinar, dando cuenta de consideraciones teórico-empíricas y elaborando las definiciones aportadas a través de múltiples argumentos basados en diferentes ciencias o disciplinas y en la práctica del diseño. Tercero, proponemos un esquema exploratorio y correlacional sobre la relación de dichas propiedades con las funciones. Por último, ofrecemos conclusiones, planteando vías de investigación futuras. Sugerimos cómo teorías procedentes de campos distintos, pueden combinarse, para desarrollar una teoría más comprensiva. El repertorio de propiedades puede ser útil para quien desee modelar el proceso de diseño y sus representaciones o para quien investigue sobre los métodos de representación.
Boujut, J.F. and Blanco, E. (2003). Intermediary objects as a means to foster cooperation in engineering design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 12 (2), 205-219. Springer. doi.org/10.1023/A:1023980212097
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Chen, K., and Owen, C.L. (1997). Form language and style description. Design studies, 18 (3), 249-274. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00002-1
Frankenberger, E., Badke-Schaub, P. and Birkhofer, H. (2012). Designers: the key to successful product development. Springer.
Gibson, J.J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Oxford. Gigerenzer, G. and Todd, P.M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.
Gero, J. (1994). Towards a model of exploration in computer-aided design. Formal design methods for CAD, pp. 315-336.
Garner, S. and McDonagh-Philp, D. (2001). Problem interpretation and resolution via visual stimuli: the use of ‘mood boards’ in design education. J. Art Des. Educ. 20 (1), 57-64. doi.org/10.1111/1468-5949.00250
Garner, S. (2001) ‘Is sketching still relevant in virtual design studios?’, en: Proceedings Design Computing on the Net (DCNet 2000), 15-19 Jan, Sydney University. Recuperado de http://www.arch.usyd.edu.au/kcdc/conferences/DCNet00/index.html
Ching, F.D., and Juroszek, S.P. (2010). Design drawing. John Wiley & Sons. Corremans, J. (2008). Basic Skills in the Study of Form-Generating Different Styling Proposals based on Variations in Surface Orientation. En: Clarke, A., Evatt, M., Hogarth, P., Lloveras, J. and Pons, L. (eds.) Proceedings of E&PDE 10th, 2008, Barcelona, Spain.
Goguen, J.A. and Harrel, D.F. (2004). Information visualisation and semiotic morphisms, en: Malcolm (2004).
Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4 (2), 123-143. doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534381
Goldschmidt, G. (1999). “Design”, p. 525-526, en: Runco, M.A., Pritzker, S.R. (eds.) (1999).
Galle, P. (1999). Design as intentional action: a conceptual analysis. Design Studies, 20(1), 57-81. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00021-0
Fridenzon-Harison, E. (2016). From Inspiration to Sketches (Fits) Methodology for Students of Product Design. En: Bohemia, E., Buck, L., Eriksen, K., Kovacevic, A., Ovesen, N., and Tollestrup, C. (eds.) Proceedings 18th E&PDE 2016; Aalborg, Denmark, 8th-9th September/2016.
Goldschmidt, G. (2004). Design Representation: Private process, public image. En: Goldschmidt, G. y Porter, W. (2004). Design Representation. London: Springer.
Goldschmidt, G. (2014). Modeling the role of sketching in design idea generation. En: Chakrabarti, A. y Blessing, L.T.M. (eds.). An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design, pp. 433-450, Springer.
Eissen, K. and Steur, R. (2014). Sketching Product Design Presentation. BISPublishers. Fonts.com. (2018) Anatomy of a Character. Recuperado de https://www.fonts.com/content/learning/fontology/level-1/type-anatomy/anatomy.
Goldschmidt, G. and Porter, W. (2004). Design Representation. London: Springer.
Goldschmidt, G. and Smolkov, M. (2006). Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies, 27 (5), 549-569. doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.01.002.
Eisentraut, R. and Günther, J. (1997). Individual styles of problem solving and their relation to representations in the design process. Design Studies, 18 (4), 369-383. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00007-0
Edmonds, B.M. (1999). Syntactic measures of complexity. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester.
Eastman, C. (2001). New directions in design cognition: studies of representation and recall. Elsevier.
Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of Art. Hackett, Indianapolis.
Dondis, D.A. (1974). A Primer of visual literacy. MIT Press.
Desmet, P.M. and Hekkert, P. (2007). Framework of product experience. International Journal of Design, 1 (1), 57-66.
Crawford, C.M. and Di Benedetto, C.A. (2003). New products management (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
external representation
An interdisciplinary repertoire of the properties of external representations in design such as sketches, is proposed to explore the functional role of such representations. The properties and functions of the representations are multiple. However, they are invariably studied from cognitive approaches or computational design reason why certain phenomena, important for different disciplines of design, are left out. Consequently, an interdisciplinary, descriptive and explanatory review of the literature is used to provide elements of response around the following three questions: what are representations in hard sciences and in design? What are their properties? And, what are their functions? Thus, basic elements about representations in design are established in the first place and, secondly, a repertoire of properties with an interdisciplinary approach, giving account of theoretical-empirical considerations and elaborating the definitions provided through multiple arguments based on different sciences and/or disciplines and in the practice of design, is built. In the third place, an explorative and correlational scheme on the relationship of these properties with the functions is proposed. And, finally, conclusions suggesting future research paths are offered. The way in which theories from different fields can be combined to develop a more comprehensive theory is suggested. The repertoire of properties can be useful for those who want to model the design process and its representations or for those researching the representation methods.
design
design cognition
Journal article
interdisciplinarity
mental representation
sketch
Properties of design representations : an interdisciplinary exploration of their functional role.
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/2334/2236
2020-01-01
1794-7111
2462-8115
10.17151/kepes.2020.17.21.2
https://doi.org/10.17151/kepes.2020.17.21.2
17
60
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Kepes
title Propiedades de las representaciones en diseño : una exploración interdisciplinaria de su rol funcional.
spellingShingle Propiedades de las representaciones en diseño : una exploración interdisciplinaria de su rol funcional.
Patiño Mazo, Ever
Maya, Jorge
sketch
representación externa
representación
diseño y cognición
diseño e interdisciplinaridad
external representation
design
design cognition
interdisciplinarity
mental representation
sketch
title_short Propiedades de las representaciones en diseño : una exploración interdisciplinaria de su rol funcional.
title_full Propiedades de las representaciones en diseño : una exploración interdisciplinaria de su rol funcional.
title_fullStr Propiedades de las representaciones en diseño : una exploración interdisciplinaria de su rol funcional.
title_full_unstemmed Propiedades de las representaciones en diseño : una exploración interdisciplinaria de su rol funcional.
title_sort propiedades de las representaciones en diseño : una exploración interdisciplinaria de su rol funcional.
title_eng Properties of design representations : an interdisciplinary exploration of their functional role.
description Un repertorio interdisciplinario de las propiedades de las representaciones externas en diseño, tales como los sketches, es propuesto para explorar el rol funcional de dichas representaciones. Las propiedades y las funciones de las representaciones son múltiples. Sin embargo, invariablemente se estudian desde enfoques cognitivos o de diseño computacional, por lo que ciertos fenómenos, importantes para diferentes disciplinas del diseño, quedan por fuera. Consecuentemente, una revisión interdisciplinaria, documental, descriptiva y explicativa de la literatura se usa para aportar elementos de respuesta alrededor de tres preguntas: ¿qué son las representaciones, en ciencias duras y en diseño? ¿Cuáles son sus propiedades? ¿Y sus funciones? Así, primero, establecemos entonces elementos básicos sobre las representaciones en diseño; segundo, construimos un repertorio de las propiedades con un enfoque interdisciplinar, dando cuenta de consideraciones teórico-empíricas y elaborando las definiciones aportadas a través de múltiples argumentos basados en diferentes ciencias o disciplinas y en la práctica del diseño. Tercero, proponemos un esquema exploratorio y correlacional sobre la relación de dichas propiedades con las funciones. Por último, ofrecemos conclusiones, planteando vías de investigación futuras. Sugerimos cómo teorías procedentes de campos distintos, pueden combinarse, para desarrollar una teoría más comprensiva. El repertorio de propiedades puede ser útil para quien desee modelar el proceso de diseño y sus representaciones o para quien investigue sobre los métodos de representación.
description_eng An interdisciplinary repertoire of the properties of external representations in design such as sketches, is proposed to explore the functional role of such representations. The properties and functions of the representations are multiple. However, they are invariably studied from cognitive approaches or computational design reason why certain phenomena, important for different disciplines of design, are left out. Consequently, an interdisciplinary, descriptive and explanatory review of the literature is used to provide elements of response around the following three questions: what are representations in hard sciences and in design? What are their properties? And, what are their functions? Thus, basic elements about representations in design are established in the first place and, secondly, a repertoire of properties with an interdisciplinary approach, giving account of theoretical-empirical considerations and elaborating the definitions provided through multiple arguments based on different sciences and/or disciplines and in the practice of design, is built. In the third place, an explorative and correlational scheme on the relationship of these properties with the functions is proposed. And, finally, conclusions suggesting future research paths are offered. The way in which theories from different fields can be combined to develop a more comprehensive theory is suggested. The repertoire of properties can be useful for those who want to model the design process and its representations or for those researching the representation methods.
author Patiño Mazo, Ever
Maya, Jorge
author_facet Patiño Mazo, Ever
Maya, Jorge
topicspa_str_mv sketch
representación externa
representación
diseño y cognición
diseño e interdisciplinaridad
topic sketch
representación externa
representación
diseño y cognición
diseño e interdisciplinaridad
external representation
design
design cognition
interdisciplinarity
mental representation
sketch
topic_facet sketch
representación externa
representación
diseño y cognición
diseño e interdisciplinaridad
external representation
design
design cognition
interdisciplinarity
mental representation
sketch
citationvolume 17
citationissue 21
citationedition Núm. 21 , Año 2020 : Enero - Junio
publisher Universidad de Caldas
ispartofjournal Kepes
source https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/2334
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Jorge Maya - 0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
references Olofsson, E., and Sjolen, K. (2005). Design Sketching, KEEOS Design-Books.
Schifferstein, H.N., and Hekkert, P. (eds.) (2008). Product Experience. Elsevier.
Schenk, P. (2007). Developing a taxonomy on drawing for design. En: Poggenpohl, s. (ed.) Proceedings IASDR’07 Conference, Hong-Kong, 12-15 Nov., 2007
Runco, M.A., and Pritzker, S.R. (1999). Encyclopedia of Creativity. (2 Vols.). Academic Press.
Runco, M.A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier.
Roozenburg, N.F., and Eekels, J. (1995). Product design: fundamentals and methods (Vol. 2). Wiley, Chichester.
Reymen, I., and Hammer, D. (2000). Design method supporting regular reflection on design situations. En: Horvath, I., Medland, A.J., and Vergeest, J.S.M. (eds.). Proceedings Third Symposium TMCE, Delft, pp.18-21.
Reisberg, D., and Logie, R. (1993) The ins and outs of working memory: Overcoming the limits on learning from imagery, en: Roskos-Ewoldsen, Intons-Peterson M., Anderson, R. (eds). Imagery, Creativity and Discovery: a cognitive approach, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 39-76
Ramachandran, V.S. (2011). The Tell-Tale Brain. W.W. Norton-Company.
Petiot, J.F. and Yannou, B. (2004). Measuring consumer perceptions for a better comprehension, specification and assessment of product semantics. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 33 (6), 507-525. doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2003.12.004
Perini, L. (2004). Convention, resemblance and isomorphism: understanding scientific visual representations, chapter 3, en: Malcolm, G. (2004).
Pellegrino J.W., Rosinski, R.R., Chiesi, H.L., and Siegel, A. (1977). Picture–word differences in decision latency: an analysis of single and dual memorymodels. Memory and Cognition, 5, 383-396. doi.org/10.3758/BF03197377
Pei, E., Campbell, I., and Evans, M.A. (2009). Building a Common Ground-The Use of Design Representation Cards for Enhancing Collaboration between Industrial Designers and Engineering Designers. En: Durling, D., Rust, C., Chen, L.-L., Ashton, P., & Friedman, K. (eds.). Proceedings Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference 2008, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK, 16-19 July 2008.
Pahl, G., Beitz, P., and Grote, K.H. (2007). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer. Pei, E. (2013). Building a common language of design representations for industrial designers and engineering designers. PhD Thesis, Loughborough University.
Otto, K.N., and Wood, K.L. (2000). Product Design. Pearson.
Novick, L.R. (2005). Problem solving, Psychology of. En: Nadel (2005).
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How practitioners think in action. London: Temple-Smith. Schön, D., and Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing, Design Studies, 13(2), 135-153. doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(92)90268-F
Ngo, D.C.L., and Byrne, J.G. (1998). Aesthetic measures for screen design. En: Calderon, P.B. & Thomas, B. (eds.) Proceedings 1998 Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference, Adelaide (pp. 64-71).
Nadel, L. (Ed.). (2005). Encyclopedia of cognitive science. Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.1002/0470018860 Nefs, H.T. (2008). On the visual appearance of Objects. En: Schifferstein & Hekkert (2008).
Mogford, R.H., Guttman, J., Morrow, S., and Kopardekar, P. (1995). The Complexity Construct in Air Traffic Control: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Technical Report, CTA.
Menezes, A., and Lawson, B. (2006). How designers perceive sketches. Design Studies, 27(5), 571-585. doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.02.001
Massironi, M. (2001). The psychology of graphic images: Seeing, drawing, communicating. Psychology Press.
Markman, A.B. (2005). Representation Formats in Psychology. En: Nadel (2005). doi.org/10.1002/0470018860.s00608
Marin, M. and Leder, H. (2013). Examining Complexity across Domains: Relating Subjective and Objective Measures of Affective Environmental Scenes, Paintings and Music. PloS one, 8(8), e72412. Public Library of Science.
Malhotra, N.K. (1996). Marketing Research, An applied Orientation. PrenticeHall.
Malcolm, G. (2004). Multidisciplinary approaches to visual representations and interpretations (Vol. 2). Elsevier.
Lloyd, P., and Snelders, D. (2003). What was Philippe Starck thinking of? Design Studies, 24(3), 237-253. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00054-6Get
Levinson, J. (2005). Philosophical Aesthetics: An overview. En: Levinson, J. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Leborg, C. (2006). Visual Grammar. Princeton Architectural Press.
Kulkarni, S., Summers, J.D., Vargas-Hernandez, N., and Shah, J.J. (2000). Collaborative Sketching (CoSketch) — An Idea Generation Technique for Engineering Design. Journal of Creative Behavior. 35 (3), 168-198. doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01045.x
Itti, L., Koch, C. and Niebur, E. (1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 20(11), 1254-1259. DOI: 10.1109/34.730558
Schneider, W., and Shiffrin, R.M. (1977). “Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention”. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1-66. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1.
Seifert, C.M. (2001). Situated cognition and Learning, en: Wilson y Keil (2001).
Hekkert, P. and Leder, H. (2008). Product Aesthetics. En: Schifferstein, H.N. & Hekkert, P. (eds.) (2008). Product experience (pp. 259-285). Elsevier, San Diego, CA.
Visser, W. (2010). Design as construction of representations. Art + Design, Psychology, (2), 29-43.
Zhao, H., Chen, J., Han, Y. and Cao, X. (2014). Image aesthetics enhancement using composition-based saliency detection. Multimedia Systems, 1-10. Springer. doi.org/10.1007/s00530-014-0373-1
Xing, J. and Manning, C.A. (2005). Complexity and Automation Displays of Air Traffic Control: Literature review and analysis. Technical Report, Office of Aerospace Medicine Washington, DC.
Wong, W. (1993). Principles of form and design. John Wiley & Sons.
Wilson, R.A., and Keil, F.C. (Eds.) (2001). The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. The MIT Press.
Wallschlaeger, C., Busic-Snyder, C. and Morgan, M. (1992). Basic visual concepts and principles for artists, architects, and designers. McGraw-Hill.
Von Foerster, H. (1996). Visión y conocimiento: disfunciones de segundo orden. En: Prigogine y Fried-Schnitman. Nuevos paradigmas, cultura y subjetividad. Paidós.
Von Eckardt, B. (1999). Mental representation. En: Wilson, R.A. and Kiel, F.C. (Eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Sciences (pp. 527–529).
Visser, W. (2007). Conception individuelle et collective. Approche de l’ergonomie cognitive. arXiv Preprint arXiv:0711.1290.
Self, J., Lee, S., and Bang, H. (2015). Perceptions of complexity in design representation: Implications for an understanding of design practice. The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice, 9 (4), 33-46.
Ulrich, K.T., and Eppinger, S.D. (1995). Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, NY.
Tversky, B. (2011). Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3 (3), 499- 535. doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01113.x
Tjalve, E. (1979). A short course in industrial design. Newnes-Butterworths, London.
Tinio, P.L., and Smith, J.K. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts. Cambridge University Press.
Suwa, M., Gero, J., and Purcell, T. (2000). Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: important vehicles for a design process.Design Studies, 21 (6), 539-567. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00034-4
Suh, N.P. (1995). Axiomatic design of mechanical systems. Journal of Mechanical Design, 117 (B)2-10. doi:10.1115/1.2836467
Sternnber, R.J., and Ben-Zeev, T. (2001). Complex Cognition. Oxford University Press.
Söderman, M. (2002). Comparing Desktop Virtual Reality with handmade sketches and real products: Exploring key aspects for end-users' understanding of proposed products. Journal of Design Research (2) 1. doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2002.009817
Snodgrass, J.G. (2005). Representations, Abstract and Concrete, en: Nadel (2005).
Smith, S.M., Ward, T.B., and Finke, R.A. (1995). The creative cognition approach. MIT Press.
Smith, C.S. (1982). A Search for Structure. Selected Essays in Science, Art and History. MIT Press.
Singer, J.L. (1999) Imagination, en: Runco y Pritzker, (1999). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier.
Shah, J.J., Smith, S.M., and Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design studies, 24 (2),111-134. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00034-0
Shah, J.J., Kulkarni, S.V., and Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2000). Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: effectiveness metrics and design of experiments. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122 (4), 377-384.doi:10.1115/1.1315592
Hutchinson, J.W., and Alba, J.W. (1991). Ignoring irrelevant information: Situational determinants of consumer learning. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 325-345. doi.org/10.1086/209263
Hekkert, P. (2015). Aesthetic responses to design: a battle of impulses. En: Tinio, Smith (2015).
Berghman, M. and Hekkert, P. (2017). Towards a unified model of aesthetic pleasure in design. New Ideas in Psychology, 47, 136-144. doi. org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.03.004
Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. University of California Press.
Akner-Koler, C. (2007). Form & formlessness: questioning aesthetic abstractions through art projects, cross-disciplinary studies and product design education. Axl Books.
Grignon, M. (2000). Deux brouillons: Le croquis et la maquette. En: Genesis (14): Architecture, edited by P-M de-Biasi, Legault. Montreal: Centre Canadien d’Architecture/Jean-Michel Place, pp 153-162.
Brereton, M. (2004). Distributed Cognition in Engineering Design: Negotiating between Abstract and Material Representations. En: Goldschmidt y Porter (2004). Design Representation. London: Springer.
Boujut, J.F. and Blanco, E. (2003). Intermediary objects as a means to foster cooperation in engineering design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 12 (2), 205-219. Springer. doi.org/10.1023/A:1023980212097
Chen, K., and Owen, C.L. (1997). Form language and style description. Design studies, 18 (3), 249-274. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00002-1
Frankenberger, E., Badke-Schaub, P. and Birkhofer, H. (2012). Designers: the key to successful product development. Springer.
Gibson, J.J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Oxford. Gigerenzer, G. and Todd, P.M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.
Gero, J. (1994). Towards a model of exploration in computer-aided design. Formal design methods for CAD, pp. 315-336.
Garner, S. and McDonagh-Philp, D. (2001). Problem interpretation and resolution via visual stimuli: the use of ‘mood boards’ in design education. J. Art Des. Educ. 20 (1), 57-64. doi.org/10.1111/1468-5949.00250
Garner, S. (2001) ‘Is sketching still relevant in virtual design studios?’, en: Proceedings Design Computing on the Net (DCNet 2000), 15-19 Jan, Sydney University. Recuperado de http://www.arch.usyd.edu.au/kcdc/conferences/DCNet00/index.html
Ching, F.D., and Juroszek, S.P. (2010). Design drawing. John Wiley & Sons. Corremans, J. (2008). Basic Skills in the Study of Form-Generating Different Styling Proposals based on Variations in Surface Orientation. En: Clarke, A., Evatt, M., Hogarth, P., Lloveras, J. and Pons, L. (eds.) Proceedings of E&PDE 10th, 2008, Barcelona, Spain.
Goguen, J.A. and Harrel, D.F. (2004). Information visualisation and semiotic morphisms, en: Malcolm (2004).
Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4 (2), 123-143. doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534381
Goldschmidt, G. (1999). “Design”, p. 525-526, en: Runco, M.A., Pritzker, S.R. (eds.) (1999).
Galle, P. (1999). Design as intentional action: a conceptual analysis. Design Studies, 20(1), 57-81. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00021-0
Fridenzon-Harison, E. (2016). From Inspiration to Sketches (Fits) Methodology for Students of Product Design. En: Bohemia, E., Buck, L., Eriksen, K., Kovacevic, A., Ovesen, N., and Tollestrup, C. (eds.) Proceedings 18th E&PDE 2016; Aalborg, Denmark, 8th-9th September/2016.
Goldschmidt, G. (2004). Design Representation: Private process, public image. En: Goldschmidt, G. y Porter, W. (2004). Design Representation. London: Springer.
Goldschmidt, G. (2014). Modeling the role of sketching in design idea generation. En: Chakrabarti, A. y Blessing, L.T.M. (eds.). An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design, pp. 433-450, Springer.
Eissen, K. and Steur, R. (2014). Sketching Product Design Presentation. BISPublishers. Fonts.com. (2018) Anatomy of a Character. Recuperado de https://www.fonts.com/content/learning/fontology/level-1/type-anatomy/anatomy.
Goldschmidt, G. and Porter, W. (2004). Design Representation. London: Springer.
Goldschmidt, G. and Smolkov, M. (2006). Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies, 27 (5), 549-569. doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.01.002.
Eisentraut, R. and Günther, J. (1997). Individual styles of problem solving and their relation to representations in the design process. Design Studies, 18 (4), 369-383. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00007-0
Edmonds, B.M. (1999). Syntactic measures of complexity. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester.
Eastman, C. (2001). New directions in design cognition: studies of representation and recall. Elsevier.
Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of Art. Hackett, Indianapolis.
Dondis, D.A. (1974). A Primer of visual literacy. MIT Press.
Desmet, P.M. and Hekkert, P. (2007). Framework of product experience. International Journal of Design, 1 (1), 57-66.
Crawford, C.M. and Di Benedetto, C.A. (2003). New products management (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2020-01-01
date_accessioned 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/2334
url_doi https://doi.org/10.17151/kepes.2020.17.21.2
issn 1794-7111
eissn 2462-8115
doi 10.17151/kepes.2020.17.21.2
citationstartpage 17
citationendpage 60
url2_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/2334/2236
_version_ 1797648111680618496

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares