La superioridad de los economistas

La superioridad de los economistas

Este artículo examina la posición dominante de la economía en la red de ciencias sociales en Estados Unidos. Primero documenta su insularidad relativa usando datos bibliométricos y luego analiza el rígido control desde arriba que le da su estructura jerárquica característica. Los economistas también se distinguen de otros científicos sociales por su mejor situación material, su visión del mundo más individualista y su confianza en la disciplina para resolver los problemas de mundo. Estas características constituyen lo que aquí se llama la superioridad de los economistas, cuya supremacía objetiva está ligada íntimamente a la sensación subjetiva de tener autoridad y derecho a ella. Esa superioridad alienta su intervención práctica y su gran i... Ver más

Guardado en:

Revista de Economía Institucional

0124-5996

2346-2450

Algan, Yann

Ollion, Etienne

Fourcade, Marion

UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA

10.18601/01245996.v17n33.02

17

2015-12-11

13

43

Colombia

razonamiento cuantitativo

científicos sociales

ciencias sociales

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

id 539d43e4657542dad5789d236d2d2551
record_format ojs
spelling La superioridad de los economistas
Jung, J. y F. Dobbin. “Finance and institutional investors”, K. K. Cetina y A. Preda, eds., The Oxford handbook of the sociology of finance,Nueva York, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 52-74.
Marwell, G. y R. E. Ames. “Economists free ride, does anyone else? Experiments on the provision of public goods”, Journal of Public Economics 15, 3, 1981, pp. 295-310.
MacKenzie, D. An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 2006.
Lévi-Strauss, C. The elementary structures of kinship [1949], Boston,Mass., Beacon Press, 1969.
Lebaron, F. La croyance économique. Les économistes entre science et politique, París, Seuil, 2000.
Leamer, E. “Tantalus on the road to Asymptopia”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, 2, 2010, pp. 31-46.
Lamont, M. How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment, Cambridge y Londres, Harvard University Press, 2009. Lazear, E. P. “Economic imperialism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 1, 2000, pp. 99-146.
Ladd, E. C. y S. M. Lipset. The divided academy: Professors and politics,Nueva York, W. W. Norton, 1976.
Laband, D. N. y M. J. Piette. “Favoritism versus search for good papers: Empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors”, Journal of Political Economy 102, 1, 1994, pp. 194-203.
Krugman, P. “How did economists get it so wrong?”, New York Times Magazine, 2 de septiembre de 2009.
Keynes, J. M. Essays in persuasion [1931], Nueva York, W. W. Norton,1962.
Kelly, M. A. y S. Bruestle. “Trends of subjects published in economic journals, 1969-2007”, Economic Inquiry 49, 3, 2011, pp. 658-673.
Jelveh, Z.; B. Kogut y S. Naidu. “Political language in economics”,Columbia Business School research paper 14-57, 2014. Jovanovic, F. “The construction of the canonical history of financial economics”, History of Political Economy 40, 2, 2008, pp. 213-242.
Mirowski, P. More heat than light. Economics as social physics, physics as nature’s economics, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, 1989. Mitchell, T. “Fixing the economy”, Cultural Studies 12, 1, 1998, pp.82-101.
Jacobs, J. A. In defense of disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and specialization in the research university, Chicago y Londres, University of Chicago Press, 2013.
Isaac, J. “Theorist at work: Talcott Parsons and the Carnegie Project on Theory, 1949-1951”, Journal of the History of Ideas 71, 2, 2010, pp. 287-311.
Hirshman, D. y E. P. Berman. “Do economists make policies? On the political effects of economics”, Socio-Economic Review 12, 4, 2014, pp. 779-811.
Heilbron, J.; J. Verhael y S. Quak. “The origins and early diffusion of ‘shareholder value’ in the United States”, Theory and Society 43, 1, 2014, pp. 1-22.40
Haskell, T. L. The emergence of professional social science: The American Social Science Association and the Nineteenth-Century crisis of authority, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.
Hansen, W. L. “The education and training of economics doctorates: Major findings of the Executive Secretary of the American Economic Association’s Commission on Graduate Education in Economics”, Journal of Economic Literature 29, 3, 1991, pp. 1054-1087.
Han, S.-K. “Tribal regimes in academia: A comparative analysis of market structure across disciplines”, Social Networks 25, 2003, 3, pp. 251-280.
Hamermesh, D. S. “Six decades of top economics publishing: Who and how?”, Journal of Economic Literature 51, 1, 2013, pp. 162-172.
Gross, N. y S. Simmons. “The social and political views of American professors”, working paper, 2007, [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.147.6141&rep=rep1&type=pdf].
Gross, N. Why are professors liberal and why so conservatives care?,Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 2013.
Godechot, O. “How did the neoclassical paradigm conquer a multidisciplinary research institution?”, Revue de la régulation 10, 2011,[http://regulation.revues.org/9429].
Medoff, M. H. “Editorial favoritism in economics?”, Southern Economic Journal 70, 2, 2003, pp. 425-434.
Montecinos, V. y J. Markoff, eds. Economists in the Americas, Cheltenham y Northampton, Edward Elgar, 2009.
Freeman, R. B. “It’s better being an economist (But don’t tell anyone)”,Journal of Economic Perspectives 13, 3, 1999, pp. 139-145.
Whitley, R. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences,Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1984.
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Zingales, L. “Preventing economists’ capture”, D. Carpenter y D. A. Moss, eds., Preventing regulatory capture: Special interest influence and how to limit it, cap. 6, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Young, C. “The emergence of sociology from political economy in the United States: 1890 to 1940”, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 45, 2, 2009, pp. 91-116.
Wu, S. “Recent publishing trends at the AER, JPE and QJE”, Applied Economics Letters 14, 1, 2007, pp. 59-63.
Whaples, R. “The policy views of American Economic Association members: The results of a new survey”, Economic Journal Watch 6, 3,2009, pp. 337-348.
Nik-K., E. y R. van Horn. “Inland empire: Economics’ imperialism as an imperative of Chicago neoliberalism”, Journal of Economic Methodology 19, 3, 2012, pp. 259-282.
Weyl, G. “Finance and the common good”, Conclusión de Après le déluge: Finance and the common good after the crisis, E. Glaeser, T. Santos y G. Weyl, eds., Chicago y Londres, University of Chicago Press, de próxima publicación.
Thaler, R. H. y C. R. Sunstein. Nudge. Improving decisions about health,wealth and happiness, Nueva York, Penguin Books, 2008.
Stigler, G. y G. Becker. “De gustibus non est disputandum”, American Economic Review 67, 2, 1977, pp. 76-90.
Steinmetz, G., ed. The politics of method in the human sciences: Positivism and its epistemological others, Durham y Londres, Duke University Press, 2005.
Sims, C. A. “But economics is not an experimental science”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, 2, 2010, pp. 59-68.
Sapienza, P. y L. Zingales. “Economic experts versus average Americans”,American Economic Review 103, 3, 2013, pp. 636-642.
Ross, D. The origins of American social science, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing,Viena, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014, [http:// www.R-project.org/].
Prasad, M. The politics of free markets: The rise of neoliberal economic policies in Britain, France, Germany, and the United States, Chicago y Londres, University of Chicago Press, 2006.
Piketty, T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 2014.
Pieters, R. y H. Baumgartner. “Who talks to whom? Intra and interdisciplinary communications of economic journals”, Journal of Economic Literature 40, 2, 2002, pp. 483-509.
Ollion, E. y A. Abbott. “Quarante ans de sociologie française aux États-Unis. Note sur la réception des sociologues français OutreAtlantique (1960-2009)”, D. Demaziere, D. Lorrain y C. Paradeise,eds., Transmissions. Une communauté en héritage, París, PUF, de próxima publicación.
Frey, B. S. y S. Meier. “Selfish and indoctrinated economists?”, European Journal of Law and Economics 19, 2, 2005, pp. 165-171.
Frank, R. H.; T. Gilovich y D. T. Regan. “Does studying economics inhibit cooperation?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 7, 2, 1993, pp. 159-171.
Frank, D. J. y J. Gabler. Reconstructing the University: Worldwide shifts in academia in the 20th Century, Stanford, Stanford University Press,2006.
17
Español
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/4304
Revista de Economía Institucional
Universidad Externado de Colombia
text/html
application/pdf
Artículo de revista
Núm. 33 , Año 2015 : Julio-Diciembre
33
I2
Abbott, A. Chaos of disciplines, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2001.
A2
A1
razonamiento cuantitativo
científicos sociales
ciencias sociales
Algan, Yann
Ollion, Etienne
Fourcade, Marion
Este artículo examina la posición dominante de la economía en la red de ciencias sociales en Estados Unidos. Primero documenta su insularidad relativa usando datos bibliométricos y luego analiza el rígido control desde arriba que le da su estructura jerárquica característica. Los economistas también se distinguen de otros científicos sociales por su mejor situación material, su visión del mundo más individualista y su confianza en la disciplina para resolver los problemas de mundo. Estas características constituyen lo que aquí se llama la superioridad de los economistas, cuya supremacía objetiva está ligada íntimamente a la sensación subjetiva de tener autoridad y derecho a ella. Esa superioridad alienta su intervención práctica y su gran influencia en la economía, pero también los expone a conflictos de interés, a la crítica política e incluso al ridículo.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Publication
Abbott, A. 2005. “The idea of outcome in U.S. sociology”, G. Steinmetz,ed., The politics of methods in the human sciences: Positivism and its epistemological others, Durham, NC, Duke University Press, pp.393-426.
Callon, M. “Introduction: The embeddedness of economic markets in economics”, The laws of the markets, Oxford, Blackwell, 1998, pp. 1-57.
Fourcade, M. y R. Khurana. “From social control to financial economics:The linked ecologies of economics and business in Twentieth Century America”, Theory and Society 42, 2, 2013, pp. 121-159.
Fourcade, M. 2009. Economists and societies: Discipline and profession in the United States, Great Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s, Princeton y Oxford, Princeton University Press.
Fourcade, M. “The construction of a global profession: The transnationalization of economics”, American Journal of Sociology 112, 1,2006, pp. 145-194.
Fligstein, N. y T. Shin. “Shareholder value and the transformation of the U.S. economy, 1984-2000”, Sociological Forum 22, 4, 2007, pp.399-424.
Fehr, E. y K. Hoff. “Introduction. Tastes, castes and culture: The influence of society on preferences”, Economic Journal 121, 556, 2011,pp. F396-F412.
Ellison, G. “Is peer review in decline?”, Economic Inquiry 49, 3, 2011,pp. 635-657.
Ellison, G. “How does the market use citation data? The Hirsch Index in economics”, NBER working paper 16419, 2010.
Coupe, T. “Revealed performances. Worldwide rankings of economists and economics departments 1969-2000”, Universidad Libre de Bruselas, 2004 [http://web.archive.org/web/20070717035652/http://homepages.ulb.ac.be/~tcoupe/ranking.html].
Cole, S. “The hierarchy of the sciences?”, American Journal of Sociology 89, 1, 1983, pp. 111-139.
Colander, D. “The making of an economist redux”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 19, 1, 2005, pp. 175-198.
Clemens, E. S.; W. W. Powell et al. “Careers in print: Books, journals,and scholarly reputations”, American Journal of Sociology 101, 2,1995, pp. 433-494.
Card, D. y S. DellaVigna. “Nine facts about top journals in economics”,Journal of Economic Literature 51, 1, 2013, pp. 144-1461.
Bowles, S. “Endogenous preferences: The cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions”, Journal of Economic Literature 36, 1, 1998, pp. 75-111.
Baron, J. N. y M. T. Hannan. “The impact of economics on contemporary sociology”, Journal of Economic Literature 32, 3, 1994, pp.1111-1146.
Bourdieu, P. y L. J. Wacquant. An invitation to reflexive sociology,Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Bourdieu, P. Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste, Cambridge,Harvard University Press, 1984. Bourdieu, P. Homo Academicus, Stanford, Stanford University Press,1988.
Blyth, M. Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,2002.
Blau, F. D. “Report of the Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession”, American Economic Review 96, 2, 2006,pp. 519-526.
Angrist, J. D. y J.-S. Pischke. “The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, 2, 2010, pp. 3-30.
Banerjee, A. V. y E. Duflo. Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty, Gurgaon, Random House, 2013.
Journal article
In this essay, we investigate the dominant position of economics within the network of the social sciences in the United States. We begin by documenting the relative insularity of economics, using bibliometric data. Next we analyze the tight management of the field from the top down, which gives economics its characteristic hierarchical structure. Economists also distinguish themselves from other social scientists through their much better material situation (many teach in business schools, have external consulting activities), their more individualist worldviews, and in the confidence they have in their discipline’s ability to fix the world’s problems. Taken together, these traits constitute what we call the superiority of economists, where economists’ objective supremacy is intimately linked with their subjective sense of authority and entitlement. While this superiority has certainly fueled economists’ practical involvement and their considerable influence over the economy, it has also exposed them more to conflicts of interests, political critique, even derision.
The Superiority of Economists
2015-12-11T00:00:00Z
13
https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v17n33.02
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/4304/4888
2346-2450
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/4304/5298
2015-12-11T00:00:00Z
0124-5996
2015-12-11
43
10.18601/01245996.v17n33.02
institution UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista de Economía Institucional
title La superioridad de los economistas
spellingShingle La superioridad de los economistas
Algan, Yann
Ollion, Etienne
Fourcade, Marion
razonamiento cuantitativo
científicos sociales
ciencias sociales
title_short La superioridad de los economistas
title_full La superioridad de los economistas
title_fullStr La superioridad de los economistas
title_full_unstemmed La superioridad de los economistas
title_sort la superioridad de los economistas
title_eng The Superiority of Economists
description Este artículo examina la posición dominante de la economía en la red de ciencias sociales en Estados Unidos. Primero documenta su insularidad relativa usando datos bibliométricos y luego analiza el rígido control desde arriba que le da su estructura jerárquica característica. Los economistas también se distinguen de otros científicos sociales por su mejor situación material, su visión del mundo más individualista y su confianza en la disciplina para resolver los problemas de mundo. Estas características constituyen lo que aquí se llama la superioridad de los economistas, cuya supremacía objetiva está ligada íntimamente a la sensación subjetiva de tener autoridad y derecho a ella. Esa superioridad alienta su intervención práctica y su gran influencia en la economía, pero también los expone a conflictos de interés, a la crítica política e incluso al ridículo.
description_eng In this essay, we investigate the dominant position of economics within the network of the social sciences in the United States. We begin by documenting the relative insularity of economics, using bibliometric data. Next we analyze the tight management of the field from the top down, which gives economics its characteristic hierarchical structure. Economists also distinguish themselves from other social scientists through their much better material situation (many teach in business schools, have external consulting activities), their more individualist worldviews, and in the confidence they have in their discipline’s ability to fix the world’s problems. Taken together, these traits constitute what we call the superiority of economists, where economists’ objective supremacy is intimately linked with their subjective sense of authority and entitlement. While this superiority has certainly fueled economists’ practical involvement and their considerable influence over the economy, it has also exposed them more to conflicts of interests, political critique, even derision.
author Algan, Yann
Ollion, Etienne
Fourcade, Marion
author_facet Algan, Yann
Ollion, Etienne
Fourcade, Marion
topicspa_str_mv razonamiento cuantitativo
científicos sociales
ciencias sociales
topic razonamiento cuantitativo
científicos sociales
ciencias sociales
topic_facet razonamiento cuantitativo
científicos sociales
ciencias sociales
citationvolume 17
citationissue 33
citationedition Núm. 33 , Año 2015 : Julio-Diciembre
publisher Universidad Externado de Colombia
ispartofjournal Revista de Economía Institucional
source https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/4304
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
references Jung, J. y F. Dobbin. “Finance and institutional investors”, K. K. Cetina y A. Preda, eds., The Oxford handbook of the sociology of finance,Nueva York, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 52-74.
Marwell, G. y R. E. Ames. “Economists free ride, does anyone else? Experiments on the provision of public goods”, Journal of Public Economics 15, 3, 1981, pp. 295-310.
MacKenzie, D. An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 2006.
Lévi-Strauss, C. The elementary structures of kinship [1949], Boston,Mass., Beacon Press, 1969.
Lebaron, F. La croyance économique. Les économistes entre science et politique, París, Seuil, 2000.
Leamer, E. “Tantalus on the road to Asymptopia”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, 2, 2010, pp. 31-46.
Lamont, M. How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment, Cambridge y Londres, Harvard University Press, 2009. Lazear, E. P. “Economic imperialism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 1, 2000, pp. 99-146.
Ladd, E. C. y S. M. Lipset. The divided academy: Professors and politics,Nueva York, W. W. Norton, 1976.
Laband, D. N. y M. J. Piette. “Favoritism versus search for good papers: Empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors”, Journal of Political Economy 102, 1, 1994, pp. 194-203.
Krugman, P. “How did economists get it so wrong?”, New York Times Magazine, 2 de septiembre de 2009.
Keynes, J. M. Essays in persuasion [1931], Nueva York, W. W. Norton,1962.
Kelly, M. A. y S. Bruestle. “Trends of subjects published in economic journals, 1969-2007”, Economic Inquiry 49, 3, 2011, pp. 658-673.
Jelveh, Z.; B. Kogut y S. Naidu. “Political language in economics”,Columbia Business School research paper 14-57, 2014. Jovanovic, F. “The construction of the canonical history of financial economics”, History of Political Economy 40, 2, 2008, pp. 213-242.
Mirowski, P. More heat than light. Economics as social physics, physics as nature’s economics, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, 1989. Mitchell, T. “Fixing the economy”, Cultural Studies 12, 1, 1998, pp.82-101.
Jacobs, J. A. In defense of disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and specialization in the research university, Chicago y Londres, University of Chicago Press, 2013.
Isaac, J. “Theorist at work: Talcott Parsons and the Carnegie Project on Theory, 1949-1951”, Journal of the History of Ideas 71, 2, 2010, pp. 287-311.
Hirshman, D. y E. P. Berman. “Do economists make policies? On the political effects of economics”, Socio-Economic Review 12, 4, 2014, pp. 779-811.
Heilbron, J.; J. Verhael y S. Quak. “The origins and early diffusion of ‘shareholder value’ in the United States”, Theory and Society 43, 1, 2014, pp. 1-22.40
Haskell, T. L. The emergence of professional social science: The American Social Science Association and the Nineteenth-Century crisis of authority, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.
Hansen, W. L. “The education and training of economics doctorates: Major findings of the Executive Secretary of the American Economic Association’s Commission on Graduate Education in Economics”, Journal of Economic Literature 29, 3, 1991, pp. 1054-1087.
Han, S.-K. “Tribal regimes in academia: A comparative analysis of market structure across disciplines”, Social Networks 25, 2003, 3, pp. 251-280.
Hamermesh, D. S. “Six decades of top economics publishing: Who and how?”, Journal of Economic Literature 51, 1, 2013, pp. 162-172.
Gross, N. y S. Simmons. “The social and political views of American professors”, working paper, 2007, [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.147.6141&rep=rep1&type=pdf].
Gross, N. Why are professors liberal and why so conservatives care?,Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 2013.
Godechot, O. “How did the neoclassical paradigm conquer a multidisciplinary research institution?”, Revue de la régulation 10, 2011,[http://regulation.revues.org/9429].
Medoff, M. H. “Editorial favoritism in economics?”, Southern Economic Journal 70, 2, 2003, pp. 425-434.
Montecinos, V. y J. Markoff, eds. Economists in the Americas, Cheltenham y Northampton, Edward Elgar, 2009.
Freeman, R. B. “It’s better being an economist (But don’t tell anyone)”,Journal of Economic Perspectives 13, 3, 1999, pp. 139-145.
Whitley, R. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences,Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1984.
Zingales, L. “Preventing economists’ capture”, D. Carpenter y D. A. Moss, eds., Preventing regulatory capture: Special interest influence and how to limit it, cap. 6, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Young, C. “The emergence of sociology from political economy in the United States: 1890 to 1940”, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 45, 2, 2009, pp. 91-116.
Wu, S. “Recent publishing trends at the AER, JPE and QJE”, Applied Economics Letters 14, 1, 2007, pp. 59-63.
Whaples, R. “The policy views of American Economic Association members: The results of a new survey”, Economic Journal Watch 6, 3,2009, pp. 337-348.
Nik-K., E. y R. van Horn. “Inland empire: Economics’ imperialism as an imperative of Chicago neoliberalism”, Journal of Economic Methodology 19, 3, 2012, pp. 259-282.
Weyl, G. “Finance and the common good”, Conclusión de Après le déluge: Finance and the common good after the crisis, E. Glaeser, T. Santos y G. Weyl, eds., Chicago y Londres, University of Chicago Press, de próxima publicación.
Thaler, R. H. y C. R. Sunstein. Nudge. Improving decisions about health,wealth and happiness, Nueva York, Penguin Books, 2008.
Stigler, G. y G. Becker. “De gustibus non est disputandum”, American Economic Review 67, 2, 1977, pp. 76-90.
Steinmetz, G., ed. The politics of method in the human sciences: Positivism and its epistemological others, Durham y Londres, Duke University Press, 2005.
Sims, C. A. “But economics is not an experimental science”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, 2, 2010, pp. 59-68.
Sapienza, P. y L. Zingales. “Economic experts versus average Americans”,American Economic Review 103, 3, 2013, pp. 636-642.
Ross, D. The origins of American social science, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing,Viena, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014, [http:// www.R-project.org/].
Prasad, M. The politics of free markets: The rise of neoliberal economic policies in Britain, France, Germany, and the United States, Chicago y Londres, University of Chicago Press, 2006.
Piketty, T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 2014.
Pieters, R. y H. Baumgartner. “Who talks to whom? Intra and interdisciplinary communications of economic journals”, Journal of Economic Literature 40, 2, 2002, pp. 483-509.
Ollion, E. y A. Abbott. “Quarante ans de sociologie française aux États-Unis. Note sur la réception des sociologues français OutreAtlantique (1960-2009)”, D. Demaziere, D. Lorrain y C. Paradeise,eds., Transmissions. Une communauté en héritage, París, PUF, de próxima publicación.
Frey, B. S. y S. Meier. “Selfish and indoctrinated economists?”, European Journal of Law and Economics 19, 2, 2005, pp. 165-171.
Frank, R. H.; T. Gilovich y D. T. Regan. “Does studying economics inhibit cooperation?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 7, 2, 1993, pp. 159-171.
Frank, D. J. y J. Gabler. Reconstructing the University: Worldwide shifts in academia in the 20th Century, Stanford, Stanford University Press,2006.
Abbott, A. Chaos of disciplines, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2001.
Abbott, A. 2005. “The idea of outcome in U.S. sociology”, G. Steinmetz,ed., The politics of methods in the human sciences: Positivism and its epistemological others, Durham, NC, Duke University Press, pp.393-426.
Callon, M. “Introduction: The embeddedness of economic markets in economics”, The laws of the markets, Oxford, Blackwell, 1998, pp. 1-57.
Fourcade, M. y R. Khurana. “From social control to financial economics:The linked ecologies of economics and business in Twentieth Century America”, Theory and Society 42, 2, 2013, pp. 121-159.
Fourcade, M. 2009. Economists and societies: Discipline and profession in the United States, Great Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s, Princeton y Oxford, Princeton University Press.
Fourcade, M. “The construction of a global profession: The transnationalization of economics”, American Journal of Sociology 112, 1,2006, pp. 145-194.
Fligstein, N. y T. Shin. “Shareholder value and the transformation of the U.S. economy, 1984-2000”, Sociological Forum 22, 4, 2007, pp.399-424.
Fehr, E. y K. Hoff. “Introduction. Tastes, castes and culture: The influence of society on preferences”, Economic Journal 121, 556, 2011,pp. F396-F412.
Ellison, G. “Is peer review in decline?”, Economic Inquiry 49, 3, 2011,pp. 635-657.
Ellison, G. “How does the market use citation data? The Hirsch Index in economics”, NBER working paper 16419, 2010.
Coupe, T. “Revealed performances. Worldwide rankings of economists and economics departments 1969-2000”, Universidad Libre de Bruselas, 2004 [http://web.archive.org/web/20070717035652/http://homepages.ulb.ac.be/~tcoupe/ranking.html].
Cole, S. “The hierarchy of the sciences?”, American Journal of Sociology 89, 1, 1983, pp. 111-139.
Colander, D. “The making of an economist redux”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 19, 1, 2005, pp. 175-198.
Clemens, E. S.; W. W. Powell et al. “Careers in print: Books, journals,and scholarly reputations”, American Journal of Sociology 101, 2,1995, pp. 433-494.
Card, D. y S. DellaVigna. “Nine facts about top journals in economics”,Journal of Economic Literature 51, 1, 2013, pp. 144-1461.
Bowles, S. “Endogenous preferences: The cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions”, Journal of Economic Literature 36, 1, 1998, pp. 75-111.
Baron, J. N. y M. T. Hannan. “The impact of economics on contemporary sociology”, Journal of Economic Literature 32, 3, 1994, pp.1111-1146.
Bourdieu, P. y L. J. Wacquant. An invitation to reflexive sociology,Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Bourdieu, P. Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste, Cambridge,Harvard University Press, 1984. Bourdieu, P. Homo Academicus, Stanford, Stanford University Press,1988.
Blyth, M. Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,2002.
Blau, F. D. “Report of the Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession”, American Economic Review 96, 2, 2006,pp. 519-526.
Angrist, J. D. y J.-S. Pischke. “The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, 2, 2010, pp. 3-30.
Banerjee, A. V. y E. Duflo. Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty, Gurgaon, Random House, 2013.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2015-12-11
date_accessioned 2015-12-11T00:00:00Z
date_available 2015-12-11T00:00:00Z
url https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/4304
url_doi https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v17n33.02
issn 0124-5996
eissn 2346-2450
doi 10.18601/01245996.v17n33.02
citationstartpage 13
citationendpage 43
url2_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/4304/4888
url3_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/4304/5298
_version_ 1797158292651245568

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares