El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas

El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas

Las empresas familiares desempeñan un rol fundamental en la economía, ya que constituyen una amplia mayoría de empresas en los distintos países y sectores y realizan un importante aporte al empleo, la producción y la generación de valor. Sin embargo, ocupan un espacio reducido en la literatura económica y empresarial, que generalmente estudia el comportamiento de las empresas sin considerar esta característica. Esto es incluso más marcado en el caso de la literatura sobre innovación, aun cuando las empresas familiares realizan también un aporte relevante a la economía a través de innovaciones productivas, organizativas y comerciales. Este artículo pretende cubrir este vacío en el caso argentino, analizando la conducta innovadora de estas fi... Ver más

Guardado en:

Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial

1657-1959

2346-2116

Milesi, Darío

Quintá Goy, Carolina

UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA

10.18601/16571959.n33.08

2022-06-15

205

240

Colombia

innovación

empresas familiares;

derechos de propiedad intelectual;

apropiación;

familiness;

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Carolina Quintá Goy, Darío Milesi - 2022

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

id 5353ae0f18dc2f26ea379f4ae73d9718
record_format ojs
spelling El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas
Habbershon, Timothy G. y Williams, Mary L. “A Resource-Based Framework for Assessing the Strategic Advantages of Family Firms”. Family Business Review, vol. 12, n.° 1, 1999, pp. 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00001.x.
Meroño-Cerdán, Ángel L.; López-Nicolás, Carolina y Molina-Castillo, Francisco. J. “Risk aversion, innovation, and performance in family firms”. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 27, n.° 2, 2018, pp. 189-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2017.1325569.
Manzaneque, Montserrat; Diéguez-Soto, Julio y Garrido-Moreno, Aurora. “Technological innovation inputs, outputs, and family management: evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms”. Innovation: Organization y Management, vol. 20, n.° 4, 2018, pp. 299-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2018.1444491.
Loschky, Alexander. Reviewing the Nomenclature for High-Technology Trade. The Sectoral Approach. OCDE, Statistics Directorate, STD/SES/WPTGS (9), París, 2010. Disponible en: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC57117/reviewing%20the%20nomenclature%20for%20hightechnology%20-%202010%20edition.pdf.
López Fernández, María C.; Serrano Bedia, Ana M.; Gómez López, Raquel y García Piqueres, Gema. “El efecto del familiness en la performance innovadora de las empresas familiares: un análisis exploratorio”. Revista de Empresa Familiar, vol. 2, n.° 2, 2012, pp. 7-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v2i2.4026.
Litz, Reginald A. “The family business: Toward definitional clarity”. Family Business Review, vol. 8, n.° 2, 1995, pp. 71-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00071.x.
Levin, Richard C.; Klervorick, Alvin K.; Nelson, Richard y Winter, Sidney. “Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development”. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 18, n.° 3, 1987, pp. 783-831.
Lansberg, Ivan S.; Perrow, Edith L. y Rogolsky, Sharon. “Family business as an emerging field”. Family Business Review, vol. 1, n.° 1, 1988, pp. 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00001.x.
König, Andreas; Kammerlander, Nadine y Enders, Albrecht. “The family innovator’s dilemma: how family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms”. Academy of Management Review, vol. 3, n.° 38, 2013, pp. 418-441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0162.
Kellermanns, Franz W. y Eddleston, Kimberly A. “A family perspective on when conflict benefits family firm’s performance”. Journal of Business Research, vol. 60, n.° 10, 2007, pp. 1048-1057. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.018.
Habbershon, Timothy G.; Williams, Mary L. y MacMillan, Ian. “A Unified Systems Perspective of Family Firm Performance”. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 18, n.° 4, 2003, pp. 451-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00053-3.
Gómez-Mejía, Luis R.; Haynes, Katalin T.; Nuñez-Nickel, Manuel; Jacobson, Kathyrn J. L. y Moyano-Fuentes, José. “Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-Controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills”. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 1, n.° 52, 2007, pp. 106-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106.
Milesi, Darío; Petelski, Natalia y Verre, Vladimiro. “Apropiación privada de los resultados de innovación”. En: G. Yoguel, V. Robert y F. Barletta (comps.). Tópicos de la teoría evolucionista neoshumpeteriana de la innovación y el cambio tecnológico, vol. 1, pp. 357-376, Argentina: UNGS, 2014.
Gersick, Kelin; Davis, John A., Mccollom Hampton, Marion y Lansberg, Ivan. Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business. Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
Gallo, Miguel A. y Sveen, Jannicke. “Internationalizing the family business: Facilitating and restraining factors”. Family Business Review, vol. 2, n.° 4, 1991, pp. 181-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00181.x.
Gallo, Miguel A. “The role of family business and its distinctive characteristic behaviour in industrial activity”. Family Business Review, vol. 8, n.° 2, 1995, pp. 83-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00083.x.
Frank, Hermann; Kessler, Alexander; Bachner, Christine; Fuetsch, Elena y Suess-Reyes, Julia. “Principles for innovation management in family firms: An analysis of long-term successful good practices with a practitioner validation of the principles”. Journal of Family Business Management, vol. 9, n.° 3, 2019, pp. 319-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-09-2018-0049.
Frank, Hermann; Kessler, Alexander; Rusch, Thomas; Suess–Reyes, Julia y Weismeier–Sammer, Daniela. “Capturing the Familiness of Family Businesses: Development of the Family Influence Familiness Scale (FIFS)”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 41, n.° 5, 2017, pp. 709-742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12229.
Frank, Hermann; Lueger, Manfred; Nosé, Lavinia y Suchy, Daniela. “The concept of ‘Familiness’: Literature review and systems theory-based reflections”. Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 1, n.° 3, 2010, pp. 119-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.08.001.
Filser, Matthias; De Massis, Alfredo D.; Gast, Johanna; Kraus, Sascha y Niemand, Thomas. “Tracing the Roots of Innovativeness in Family SMEs: The Effect of Family Functionality and Socioemotional Wealth”. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 35, n.° 4, 2018, pp. 609-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12433.
Fahed-Sreih, Josiane y Djoundourian, Salpie. “Determinants of longevity and success in Lebanese family businesses: An exploratory study”. Family Business Review, vol. 19, n.° 3, 2006, pp. 225-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00071.x.
Fagerberg, Jan; Martin, Ben R. y Andersen, Esben S. (eds.). Innovation Studies: Evolution and Future Challenges. Croydon, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013. Disponible en: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4103729/mod_resource/content/1/Fagerberg-MaertinAndersen-Innovation%20Studies%202013.pdf.
Dyer, W. Gibb. “The family: The missing variable in organizational research”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 4, n.° 27, 2003, pp. 401-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00018.
Dosi, Giovanni; Marengo, Luigi y Pasquali, Corrado. “How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation”. Research Policy, vol. 35, n.° 8, 2006, pp. 1110-1121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.003.
Milesi, Darío; Petelski, Natalia y Verre, Vladimiro. “Innovation and appropriation mechanisms: Evidence from Argentine microdata”. Technovation, vol. 33, n.° 1-2, 2013, pp. 78-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.12.001.
Minichilli, Alessandro; Corbetta, Guido y MacMillan, Ian. “Top Management Teams in Family-Controlled Companies: ‘Familiness’, ‘Faultlines’, and Their Impact on Financial Performance”. Journal of Management Studies, Special Issue: The Family and Enterprise: Unpacking the Connections, vol. 47, n.° 2, 2010, pp. 205–222. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00888.x.
De Massis, Alfredo; Di Minin, Alberto y Frattini, Federico. “Family-Driven Innovation: Resolving the Paradox in Family Firms”. California Management Review, vol. 58, n.° 1, 2015, pp. 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.58.1.5.
Ward, John L. Keeping the Family Business Healthy: How to Plan for Continuing Growth, Profitability, and Family Leadership. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1987 (2011, impreso).
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Zahra, Shaker A. “Entrepreneurial Risk Taking in Family Firms: The Wellspring of the Regenerative Capability”. Family Business Review, vol. 31, n.° 2, 2018, pp. 216-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518776871.
Zahra, Shaker A. “Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms”. Family Business Review, vol. 18, n.° 1, 2005, pp. 23-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00028.x.
Ward, John y Dolan, Christina. “Defining and describing family business ownership configurations”. Family Business Review, vol. 11, n.° 4, 1998, pp. 305-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1998.00305.x.
Vélez-Montes, Diego; Holguín-Lagos, Harry; De La Hoz-Pinzón, Gerardo A.; Durán-Bobadilla, Yazmín y Gutiérrez-Ayala, Irma. Dinámica de la empresa familiar pyme: estudio exploratorio en Colombia. Bogotá: Fundación para el Desarrollo Sostenible, 2008.
Neubauer, Fred y Lank, Alden G. La empresa familiar: cómo dirigirla para que perdure. Bilbao: Deusto, 1999.
Teece, David J. “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy”. Research Policy, vol. 15, n.° 6, 1986, pp. 285-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2.
Stern, Milton H. Inside the Family Held Business: A practical guide for ntrepreneurs and Their Advisors. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1986.
Staniewski, Marcin y Awruk, Katarzyna. “Systems Approach to Entrepreneurial Success: The Theoretical Discussion on the Significance of Family Factors for Effective Entrepreneurship”. En: Ana Tur Porcar y Domingo Ribeiro Soriano (eds.). Inside the Mind of the Entrepreneur. Cognition, Personality Traits, Intention, and Gender Behavior, pp. 163-174. Springer, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62455-6_12.
Sirmon, David G. y Hitt, Michael A. “Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management and Wealth Creation in Family Firms”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 27, n.° 4, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00013.
Siebels, Jan‐Folke y Knyphausen-Aufseβ, Dodo zu. 2012. “A Review of Theory in Family Business Research: The Implications for Corporate Governance”. International Journal of Management Reviews, n.° 14, 2012, pp. 280-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00317.x.
Shanker, Melissa C. y Astrachan, Joseph H. “Myths and realities: family businesses’ contribution to the US economy, a framework for assessing family business statistics”. Family Business Review, vol. 2, n.° 9, 1996, pp. 107-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00107.x.
Rosenblatt, Paul C.; De Mik, Leni; Anderson, Roxanne M. y Johnson, Patricia A. The family in business: Understanding and dealing with the challenge’s entrepreneurial families face. San Francisco, EE. UU.: Jossey Bass Business & Management Series, 1985.
Rondi, Emanuela; De Massis, Alfredo y Kotlar, Josip. “Unlocking innovation potential: A typology of family business innovation postures and the critical role of the family system”. Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 4, n.° 4, 2019. DOI: 10. 10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.12.001.
Press, Eduardo. Empresas de familia: del conflicto a la eficiencia. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Granica, 2011.
Poza, Ernesto J. Empresas familiares, 3a ed. Boston, Estados Unidos: Cengage Learning Editores S.A. de C.V., 2011.
Peña-López, José A. y Sánchez-Santos, José M. (2011). El capital social como recurso de la empresa familiar: la familiness. La Coruña, España: Netbiblo, 2011.
De Massis, Alfredo; Sharma, Pramodita; Chua, James H. y Chrisman, Jess J. Family Business Studies: An Annotated Bibliography. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012. DOI: 10.4337/9781781002988.
Davis, Peter. “Realizing the potential of the family business”. Organizational Dynamics, vol. 12, n.° 1, 1983, pp. 47-56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(83)90026-8.
Daspit, Joshua J.; Long, Rebecca G. y Pearson, Allison W. “How familiness affects innovation outcomes via absorptive capacity: A dynamic capability perspective of the family firm”. Journal of Family Business Strategy. Elsevier, vol. 10, n.° 2, 2018, pp. 133-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.11.003.
Núm. 33 , Año 2022 : Enero-Junio
Español
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/7885
Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial
Centro de Estudios de la Propiedad Intelectual
text/html
application/pdf
Artículo de revista
33
Carolina Quintá Goy, Darío Milesi - 2022
innovación
empresas familiares;
derechos de propiedad intelectual;
apropiación;
familiness;
Milesi, Darío
Quintá Goy, Carolina
Las empresas familiares desempeñan un rol fundamental en la economía, ya que constituyen una amplia mayoría de empresas en los distintos países y sectores y realizan un importante aporte al empleo, la producción y la generación de valor. Sin embargo, ocupan un espacio reducido en la literatura económica y empresarial, que generalmente estudia el comportamiento de las empresas sin considerar esta característica. Esto es incluso más marcado en el caso de la literatura sobre innovación, aun cuando las empresas familiares realizan también un aporte relevante a la economía a través de innovaciones productivas, organizativas y comerciales. Este artículo pretende cubrir este vacío en el caso argentino, analizando la conducta innovadora de estas firmas y, fundamentalmente, sus estrategias de apropiación. Para ello se basa en evidencia empírica derivada de la más reciente encuesta de innovación argentina (ENDEI II) que cuenta con datos sobre 3.944 empresas, de las cuales 2.945 son familiares. Para analizar el vínculo entre el carácter familiar de las empresas, sus actividades de innovación y sus estrategias de apropiación se recurre al concepto de familiness, que alude a aquellos elementos idiosincráticos que surgen de la interacción entre los miembros de la familia y su participación en la empresa, y le confieren a la misma su carácter distintivo. Los resultados del estudio muestran que la familiness no se presenta con la misma intensidad (débil o fuerte) en todas las empresas familiares, y que tanto la actividad innovadora como la forma en que las empresas familiares se apropian de los resultados de innovación difieren de acuerdo con su grado de familiness.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Publication
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Barry, Bernard. “The development of organization structure in the family firm”. Family Business Review, vol. 2, n.° 3, 1989, pp. 293-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.00293.x.
Cruz, Cristina y Nordqvist, Mattias. “Entrepreneurial orientation in family businesses: A generational perspective”. Small Business Economics, n.° 38, 2012, pp. 33-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9265-8.
Chua, James H.; Chrisman, Jess J. y Sharma, Pramodita. “Defining the Family Business by Behavior”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 23, n.° 4, 1999, pp. 19-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402.
Chrisman, James J.; Chua, Jess H. y Sharma, Pramodita. “Current trends and future directions in Family business management studies: Toward a theory of the family firm”. Coleman White Paper Series, vol. 4, 2003.
Chrisman, James J.; Chua, Jess H. y Steier, Lloyd P. “An introduction to theories of family business”. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 18, n.° 4, 2003, pp. 441-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00052-1.
Chrisman, James J.; Chua, Jess H. y Litz, Reginald. “A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: An extension and integration”. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 4, n.° 18, 2003, pp. 467-472. DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00055-7.
Casrud, Alan L. “Meanderings of a resurrected psychologist or lessons learned in creating a program”. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, vol. 1, n.° 19, 1994, pp. 39-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401900103.
Cano-Rubio, Myriam; Fuentes-Lombardo, Guadalupe; Hernández-Ortiz, María J. y Vallejo-Martos, Manuel C. “Composition of familiness: Perspectives of social capital and open systems”. European Journal of Family Business, vol. 6, n.° 2, 2016, pp. 75-85. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2016.12.002.
Cabrera-Suárez, Katiuska; De Saá-Pérez, Petra y García-Almeida, Desiderio. “The succession process from a resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm”. Family Business Review, n.° 14, 2001, pp. 37-46. DOI:10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00037.x.
Bruton, Garry; Ahlstrom, David y Wan, Johnny C. C. “Turnaround in East Asian firms: evidence from ethnic Overseas Chinese communities”. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24, n.° 6, 2003, pp. 519-540. DOI: 10.1002/smj.312.
Bork, David. La empresa familiar frente a sus retos. Madrid: Grupo Planeta, 2013.
Barnes, Louis B. y Hershon, Simon A. “Transferring power in family business”. Family Business Review, vol. 2, n.° 2, 1989, pp. 187-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.00187.x.
Bannò, Marisole. “Propensity to patent by family firms”. Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 7, n.° 4, 2016, pp. 1-11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.07.002.
Aiello, Francesco; Cardamone, Paola; Mannarino, Lidia y Pupo, Valeria. Does external R&D matter for family firm innovation? Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Working Paper Series n.° 202002, University of Calabria, Department of Economics, Statistics and Finance “Giovanni Anania” – DESF, 2020.
Barros, Ismael: Hernán-Gómez, Juan y Martín-Cruz, Natalia. “Familiness and socioemotional wealth in Spanish family firms: An empirical examination”. European Journal of Family Business, n.° 7, 2017, pp. 14-24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2017.06.004.
Arzubiaga, Unai; Maseda, Amaia e Iturralde, Txomin. “Exploratory and exploitative innovation in family businesses: the moderating role of the family firm image and family involvement in top management”. Review of Managerial Science, n.° 13, 2019, pp. 1-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0239-y.
Aronoff, Craig. E. y Ward, John. L. Family business governance: Maximizing family and business potential. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. A Family Business Publication, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230116016.
Family Business;
Family businesses fulfill a fundamental role in the economy as they constitute a vast majority of companies in different countries and sectors and make an important contribution to employment, production and generating value. Nevertheless, they occupy a small space in the business and corporate literature, which generally studies the behavior of companies without considering this feature. This is even more so in the literature on innovation, although family businesses also make a relevant contribution to the economy through productive, organizational, and commercial innovations. This article intends to fill this gap in the Argentine case, analyzing the innovative behavior of these firms and, fundamentally, their appropriability strategies. To do so, empirical evidence is used from the most recent Argentine innovation survey (ENDEI II) which has data on 3.944 companies, of which 2.954 are family businesses. To analyse the link between the family nature of the businesses, their innovation activities and their appropriability strategies, the concept of familiness is resorted to, which alludes to those idiosyncratic elements that arise from the interaction of the family members and their participation in the business, imbuing it with its distinctive character. The results of the study show that familiness does not appear with the same intensity (weak or strong) in all family businesses, and that both innovative activity and the way in which family businesses appropriate innovation results, differ according to their degree of familiness.
Journal article
The role of familiness in the innovation and appropriation strategies of Argentine family businesses
Familiness;
Innovation
Appropriation;
Intellectual Property Rights;
240
https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n33.08
10.18601/16571959.n33.08
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/7885/12514
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/7885/12513
2022-06-15
2346-2116
205
2022-06-15T11:59:03Z
2022-06-15T11:59:03Z
1657-1959
institution UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial
title El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas
spellingShingle El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas
Milesi, Darío
Quintá Goy, Carolina
innovación
empresas familiares;
derechos de propiedad intelectual;
apropiación;
familiness;
Family Business;
Familiness;
Innovation
Appropriation;
Intellectual Property Rights;
title_short El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas
title_full El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas
title_fullStr El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas
title_full_unstemmed El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas
title_sort el rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas
title_eng The role of familiness in the innovation and appropriation strategies of Argentine family businesses
description Las empresas familiares desempeñan un rol fundamental en la economía, ya que constituyen una amplia mayoría de empresas en los distintos países y sectores y realizan un importante aporte al empleo, la producción y la generación de valor. Sin embargo, ocupan un espacio reducido en la literatura económica y empresarial, que generalmente estudia el comportamiento de las empresas sin considerar esta característica. Esto es incluso más marcado en el caso de la literatura sobre innovación, aun cuando las empresas familiares realizan también un aporte relevante a la economía a través de innovaciones productivas, organizativas y comerciales. Este artículo pretende cubrir este vacío en el caso argentino, analizando la conducta innovadora de estas firmas y, fundamentalmente, sus estrategias de apropiación. Para ello se basa en evidencia empírica derivada de la más reciente encuesta de innovación argentina (ENDEI II) que cuenta con datos sobre 3.944 empresas, de las cuales 2.945 son familiares. Para analizar el vínculo entre el carácter familiar de las empresas, sus actividades de innovación y sus estrategias de apropiación se recurre al concepto de familiness, que alude a aquellos elementos idiosincráticos que surgen de la interacción entre los miembros de la familia y su participación en la empresa, y le confieren a la misma su carácter distintivo. Los resultados del estudio muestran que la familiness no se presenta con la misma intensidad (débil o fuerte) en todas las empresas familiares, y que tanto la actividad innovadora como la forma en que las empresas familiares se apropian de los resultados de innovación difieren de acuerdo con su grado de familiness.
description_eng Family businesses fulfill a fundamental role in the economy as they constitute a vast majority of companies in different countries and sectors and make an important contribution to employment, production and generating value. Nevertheless, they occupy a small space in the business and corporate literature, which generally studies the behavior of companies without considering this feature. This is even more so in the literature on innovation, although family businesses also make a relevant contribution to the economy through productive, organizational, and commercial innovations. This article intends to fill this gap in the Argentine case, analyzing the innovative behavior of these firms and, fundamentally, their appropriability strategies. To do so, empirical evidence is used from the most recent Argentine innovation survey (ENDEI II) which has data on 3.944 companies, of which 2.954 are family businesses. To analyse the link between the family nature of the businesses, their innovation activities and their appropriability strategies, the concept of familiness is resorted to, which alludes to those idiosyncratic elements that arise from the interaction of the family members and their participation in the business, imbuing it with its distinctive character. The results of the study show that familiness does not appear with the same intensity (weak or strong) in all family businesses, and that both innovative activity and the way in which family businesses appropriate innovation results, differ according to their degree of familiness.
author Milesi, Darío
Quintá Goy, Carolina
author_facet Milesi, Darío
Quintá Goy, Carolina
topicspa_str_mv innovación
empresas familiares;
derechos de propiedad intelectual;
apropiación;
familiness;
topic innovación
empresas familiares;
derechos de propiedad intelectual;
apropiación;
familiness;
Family Business;
Familiness;
Innovation
Appropriation;
Intellectual Property Rights;
topic_facet innovación
empresas familiares;
derechos de propiedad intelectual;
apropiación;
familiness;
Family Business;
Familiness;
Innovation
Appropriation;
Intellectual Property Rights;
citationissue 33
citationedition Núm. 33 , Año 2022 : Enero-Junio
publisher Centro de Estudios de la Propiedad Intelectual
ispartofjournal Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial
source https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/7885
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Carolina Quintá Goy, Darío Milesi - 2022
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
references Habbershon, Timothy G. y Williams, Mary L. “A Resource-Based Framework for Assessing the Strategic Advantages of Family Firms”. Family Business Review, vol. 12, n.° 1, 1999, pp. 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00001.x.
Meroño-Cerdán, Ángel L.; López-Nicolás, Carolina y Molina-Castillo, Francisco. J. “Risk aversion, innovation, and performance in family firms”. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 27, n.° 2, 2018, pp. 189-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2017.1325569.
Manzaneque, Montserrat; Diéguez-Soto, Julio y Garrido-Moreno, Aurora. “Technological innovation inputs, outputs, and family management: evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms”. Innovation: Organization y Management, vol. 20, n.° 4, 2018, pp. 299-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2018.1444491.
Loschky, Alexander. Reviewing the Nomenclature for High-Technology Trade. The Sectoral Approach. OCDE, Statistics Directorate, STD/SES/WPTGS (9), París, 2010. Disponible en: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC57117/reviewing%20the%20nomenclature%20for%20hightechnology%20-%202010%20edition.pdf.
López Fernández, María C.; Serrano Bedia, Ana M.; Gómez López, Raquel y García Piqueres, Gema. “El efecto del familiness en la performance innovadora de las empresas familiares: un análisis exploratorio”. Revista de Empresa Familiar, vol. 2, n.° 2, 2012, pp. 7-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v2i2.4026.
Litz, Reginald A. “The family business: Toward definitional clarity”. Family Business Review, vol. 8, n.° 2, 1995, pp. 71-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00071.x.
Levin, Richard C.; Klervorick, Alvin K.; Nelson, Richard y Winter, Sidney. “Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development”. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 18, n.° 3, 1987, pp. 783-831.
Lansberg, Ivan S.; Perrow, Edith L. y Rogolsky, Sharon. “Family business as an emerging field”. Family Business Review, vol. 1, n.° 1, 1988, pp. 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00001.x.
König, Andreas; Kammerlander, Nadine y Enders, Albrecht. “The family innovator’s dilemma: how family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms”. Academy of Management Review, vol. 3, n.° 38, 2013, pp. 418-441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0162.
Kellermanns, Franz W. y Eddleston, Kimberly A. “A family perspective on when conflict benefits family firm’s performance”. Journal of Business Research, vol. 60, n.° 10, 2007, pp. 1048-1057. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.018.
Habbershon, Timothy G.; Williams, Mary L. y MacMillan, Ian. “A Unified Systems Perspective of Family Firm Performance”. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 18, n.° 4, 2003, pp. 451-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00053-3.
Gómez-Mejía, Luis R.; Haynes, Katalin T.; Nuñez-Nickel, Manuel; Jacobson, Kathyrn J. L. y Moyano-Fuentes, José. “Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-Controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills”. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 1, n.° 52, 2007, pp. 106-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106.
Milesi, Darío; Petelski, Natalia y Verre, Vladimiro. “Apropiación privada de los resultados de innovación”. En: G. Yoguel, V. Robert y F. Barletta (comps.). Tópicos de la teoría evolucionista neoshumpeteriana de la innovación y el cambio tecnológico, vol. 1, pp. 357-376, Argentina: UNGS, 2014.
Gersick, Kelin; Davis, John A., Mccollom Hampton, Marion y Lansberg, Ivan. Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business. Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
Gallo, Miguel A. y Sveen, Jannicke. “Internationalizing the family business: Facilitating and restraining factors”. Family Business Review, vol. 2, n.° 4, 1991, pp. 181-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00181.x.
Gallo, Miguel A. “The role of family business and its distinctive characteristic behaviour in industrial activity”. Family Business Review, vol. 8, n.° 2, 1995, pp. 83-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00083.x.
Frank, Hermann; Kessler, Alexander; Bachner, Christine; Fuetsch, Elena y Suess-Reyes, Julia. “Principles for innovation management in family firms: An analysis of long-term successful good practices with a practitioner validation of the principles”. Journal of Family Business Management, vol. 9, n.° 3, 2019, pp. 319-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-09-2018-0049.
Frank, Hermann; Kessler, Alexander; Rusch, Thomas; Suess–Reyes, Julia y Weismeier–Sammer, Daniela. “Capturing the Familiness of Family Businesses: Development of the Family Influence Familiness Scale (FIFS)”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 41, n.° 5, 2017, pp. 709-742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12229.
Frank, Hermann; Lueger, Manfred; Nosé, Lavinia y Suchy, Daniela. “The concept of ‘Familiness’: Literature review and systems theory-based reflections”. Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 1, n.° 3, 2010, pp. 119-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.08.001.
Filser, Matthias; De Massis, Alfredo D.; Gast, Johanna; Kraus, Sascha y Niemand, Thomas. “Tracing the Roots of Innovativeness in Family SMEs: The Effect of Family Functionality and Socioemotional Wealth”. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 35, n.° 4, 2018, pp. 609-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12433.
Fahed-Sreih, Josiane y Djoundourian, Salpie. “Determinants of longevity and success in Lebanese family businesses: An exploratory study”. Family Business Review, vol. 19, n.° 3, 2006, pp. 225-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00071.x.
Fagerberg, Jan; Martin, Ben R. y Andersen, Esben S. (eds.). Innovation Studies: Evolution and Future Challenges. Croydon, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013. Disponible en: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4103729/mod_resource/content/1/Fagerberg-MaertinAndersen-Innovation%20Studies%202013.pdf.
Dyer, W. Gibb. “The family: The missing variable in organizational research”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 4, n.° 27, 2003, pp. 401-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00018.
Dosi, Giovanni; Marengo, Luigi y Pasquali, Corrado. “How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation”. Research Policy, vol. 35, n.° 8, 2006, pp. 1110-1121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.003.
Milesi, Darío; Petelski, Natalia y Verre, Vladimiro. “Innovation and appropriation mechanisms: Evidence from Argentine microdata”. Technovation, vol. 33, n.° 1-2, 2013, pp. 78-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.12.001.
Minichilli, Alessandro; Corbetta, Guido y MacMillan, Ian. “Top Management Teams in Family-Controlled Companies: ‘Familiness’, ‘Faultlines’, and Their Impact on Financial Performance”. Journal of Management Studies, Special Issue: The Family and Enterprise: Unpacking the Connections, vol. 47, n.° 2, 2010, pp. 205–222. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00888.x.
De Massis, Alfredo; Di Minin, Alberto y Frattini, Federico. “Family-Driven Innovation: Resolving the Paradox in Family Firms”. California Management Review, vol. 58, n.° 1, 2015, pp. 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.58.1.5.
Ward, John L. Keeping the Family Business Healthy: How to Plan for Continuing Growth, Profitability, and Family Leadership. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1987 (2011, impreso).
Zahra, Shaker A. “Entrepreneurial Risk Taking in Family Firms: The Wellspring of the Regenerative Capability”. Family Business Review, vol. 31, n.° 2, 2018, pp. 216-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518776871.
Zahra, Shaker A. “Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms”. Family Business Review, vol. 18, n.° 1, 2005, pp. 23-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00028.x.
Ward, John y Dolan, Christina. “Defining and describing family business ownership configurations”. Family Business Review, vol. 11, n.° 4, 1998, pp. 305-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1998.00305.x.
Vélez-Montes, Diego; Holguín-Lagos, Harry; De La Hoz-Pinzón, Gerardo A.; Durán-Bobadilla, Yazmín y Gutiérrez-Ayala, Irma. Dinámica de la empresa familiar pyme: estudio exploratorio en Colombia. Bogotá: Fundación para el Desarrollo Sostenible, 2008.
Neubauer, Fred y Lank, Alden G. La empresa familiar: cómo dirigirla para que perdure. Bilbao: Deusto, 1999.
Teece, David J. “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy”. Research Policy, vol. 15, n.° 6, 1986, pp. 285-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2.
Stern, Milton H. Inside the Family Held Business: A practical guide for ntrepreneurs and Their Advisors. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1986.
Staniewski, Marcin y Awruk, Katarzyna. “Systems Approach to Entrepreneurial Success: The Theoretical Discussion on the Significance of Family Factors for Effective Entrepreneurship”. En: Ana Tur Porcar y Domingo Ribeiro Soriano (eds.). Inside the Mind of the Entrepreneur. Cognition, Personality Traits, Intention, and Gender Behavior, pp. 163-174. Springer, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62455-6_12.
Sirmon, David G. y Hitt, Michael A. “Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management and Wealth Creation in Family Firms”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 27, n.° 4, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00013.
Siebels, Jan‐Folke y Knyphausen-Aufseβ, Dodo zu. 2012. “A Review of Theory in Family Business Research: The Implications for Corporate Governance”. International Journal of Management Reviews, n.° 14, 2012, pp. 280-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00317.x.
Shanker, Melissa C. y Astrachan, Joseph H. “Myths and realities: family businesses’ contribution to the US economy, a framework for assessing family business statistics”. Family Business Review, vol. 2, n.° 9, 1996, pp. 107-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00107.x.
Rosenblatt, Paul C.; De Mik, Leni; Anderson, Roxanne M. y Johnson, Patricia A. The family in business: Understanding and dealing with the challenge’s entrepreneurial families face. San Francisco, EE. UU.: Jossey Bass Business & Management Series, 1985.
Rondi, Emanuela; De Massis, Alfredo y Kotlar, Josip. “Unlocking innovation potential: A typology of family business innovation postures and the critical role of the family system”. Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 4, n.° 4, 2019. DOI: 10. 10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.12.001.
Press, Eduardo. Empresas de familia: del conflicto a la eficiencia. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Granica, 2011.
Poza, Ernesto J. Empresas familiares, 3a ed. Boston, Estados Unidos: Cengage Learning Editores S.A. de C.V., 2011.
Peña-López, José A. y Sánchez-Santos, José M. (2011). El capital social como recurso de la empresa familiar: la familiness. La Coruña, España: Netbiblo, 2011.
De Massis, Alfredo; Sharma, Pramodita; Chua, James H. y Chrisman, Jess J. Family Business Studies: An Annotated Bibliography. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012. DOI: 10.4337/9781781002988.
Davis, Peter. “Realizing the potential of the family business”. Organizational Dynamics, vol. 12, n.° 1, 1983, pp. 47-56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(83)90026-8.
Daspit, Joshua J.; Long, Rebecca G. y Pearson, Allison W. “How familiness affects innovation outcomes via absorptive capacity: A dynamic capability perspective of the family firm”. Journal of Family Business Strategy. Elsevier, vol. 10, n.° 2, 2018, pp. 133-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.11.003.
Barry, Bernard. “The development of organization structure in the family firm”. Family Business Review, vol. 2, n.° 3, 1989, pp. 293-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.00293.x.
Cruz, Cristina y Nordqvist, Mattias. “Entrepreneurial orientation in family businesses: A generational perspective”. Small Business Economics, n.° 38, 2012, pp. 33-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9265-8.
Chua, James H.; Chrisman, Jess J. y Sharma, Pramodita. “Defining the Family Business by Behavior”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 23, n.° 4, 1999, pp. 19-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402.
Chrisman, James J.; Chua, Jess H. y Sharma, Pramodita. “Current trends and future directions in Family business management studies: Toward a theory of the family firm”. Coleman White Paper Series, vol. 4, 2003.
Chrisman, James J.; Chua, Jess H. y Steier, Lloyd P. “An introduction to theories of family business”. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 18, n.° 4, 2003, pp. 441-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00052-1.
Chrisman, James J.; Chua, Jess H. y Litz, Reginald. “A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: An extension and integration”. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 4, n.° 18, 2003, pp. 467-472. DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00055-7.
Casrud, Alan L. “Meanderings of a resurrected psychologist or lessons learned in creating a program”. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, vol. 1, n.° 19, 1994, pp. 39-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401900103.
Cano-Rubio, Myriam; Fuentes-Lombardo, Guadalupe; Hernández-Ortiz, María J. y Vallejo-Martos, Manuel C. “Composition of familiness: Perspectives of social capital and open systems”. European Journal of Family Business, vol. 6, n.° 2, 2016, pp. 75-85. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2016.12.002.
Cabrera-Suárez, Katiuska; De Saá-Pérez, Petra y García-Almeida, Desiderio. “The succession process from a resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm”. Family Business Review, n.° 14, 2001, pp. 37-46. DOI:10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00037.x.
Bruton, Garry; Ahlstrom, David y Wan, Johnny C. C. “Turnaround in East Asian firms: evidence from ethnic Overseas Chinese communities”. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24, n.° 6, 2003, pp. 519-540. DOI: 10.1002/smj.312.
Bork, David. La empresa familiar frente a sus retos. Madrid: Grupo Planeta, 2013.
Barnes, Louis B. y Hershon, Simon A. “Transferring power in family business”. Family Business Review, vol. 2, n.° 2, 1989, pp. 187-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.00187.x.
Bannò, Marisole. “Propensity to patent by family firms”. Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 7, n.° 4, 2016, pp. 1-11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.07.002.
Aiello, Francesco; Cardamone, Paola; Mannarino, Lidia y Pupo, Valeria. Does external R&D matter for family firm innovation? Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Working Paper Series n.° 202002, University of Calabria, Department of Economics, Statistics and Finance “Giovanni Anania” – DESF, 2020.
Barros, Ismael: Hernán-Gómez, Juan y Martín-Cruz, Natalia. “Familiness and socioemotional wealth in Spanish family firms: An empirical examination”. European Journal of Family Business, n.° 7, 2017, pp. 14-24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2017.06.004.
Arzubiaga, Unai; Maseda, Amaia e Iturralde, Txomin. “Exploratory and exploitative innovation in family businesses: the moderating role of the family firm image and family involvement in top management”. Review of Managerial Science, n.° 13, 2019, pp. 1-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0239-y.
Aronoff, Craig. E. y Ward, John. L. Family business governance: Maximizing family and business potential. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. A Family Business Publication, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230116016.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2022-06-15
date_accessioned 2022-06-15T11:59:03Z
date_available 2022-06-15T11:59:03Z
url https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/7885
url_doi https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n33.08
issn 1657-1959
eissn 2346-2116
doi 10.18601/16571959.n33.08
citationstartpage 205
citationendpage 240
url3_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/7885/12514
url2_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/7885/12513
_version_ 1797157788516876288

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares