La evidencia empírica sobre las determinantes de la descentralización fiscal

Este artículo analiza las principales determinantes de descentralización fiscal en una muestra de 84 países. Los resultados empíricos demuestran que el tamaño geográfico de un país es la variable que con mayor consistencia afecta el nivel de descentralización fiscal. Países con mayor equidad en la distribución del ingreso, con niveles de educación altos, más democráticos, más urbanizados y abiertos al comercio internacional tienden a ser más descentralizados, aunque los resultados demuestran que existen variaciones  en el patrón de comportamiento a nivel regional y de ingreso. La implicación de política más importante es que aquellos países interesados en descentralizar funciones gubernamentales deberían considerar actuar sobre... Ver más

Guardado en:

2248-6046

2011-7663

12

2020-01-01

271

302

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id 51d05b8eb965fcb08c0f90fdd8e9589d
record_format ojs
spelling La evidencia empírica sobre las determinantes de la descentralización fiscal
Autonomía regional
Revista Finanzas y Política Económica
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Artículo de revista
1
Desentralización fiscal
12
Federalismo
Bojanic, Antonio Nicolás
Este artículo analiza las principales determinantes de descentralización fiscal en una muestra de 84 países. Los resultados empíricos demuestran que el tamaño geográfico de un país es la variable que con mayor consistencia afecta el nivel de descentralización fiscal. Países con mayor equidad en la distribución del ingreso, con niveles de educación altos, más democráticos, más urbanizados y abiertos al comercio internacional tienden a ser más descentralizados, aunque los resultados demuestran que existen variaciones  en el patrón de comportamiento a nivel regional y de ingreso. La implicación de política más importante es que aquellos países interesados en descentralizar funciones gubernamentales deberían considerar actuar sobre aquellas variables que han demostrado tener una influencia positiva sobre este proceso.
Letelier, L.S. (2005). Explaining fiscal decentralization. Public Finance Review, 33(2), 155-183.
Jílek, M. (2015). Factors of tax decentralization in OECD-Europe countries. European Financial and Accounting Journal, 10(2), 33-49.
Treisman, D. (2006). Explaining fiscal decentralisation: Geography, colonial history, economic development and political institutions. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 44:3, pp. 289-325.
Jametti, M., & Joanis, M. (2010). Determinants of fiscal decentralization: Political economy aspects. Document de treball de l’IEB 2010/7. Institut d’Economia de Barcelona. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46469104_Determinants_of_fiscal_decentralization_political_economy_aspects
Musgrave, R. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Musgrave, R. (1969). Theories of fiscal federalism. Public Finance, 24(4), 521-536.
Oates, W.E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,
Oates, W.E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120-1149.
Oates, W.E. (2007). On the theory and practice of fiscal Decentralization. CREI Working Paper no 1/2007. Retrieved from http://host.uniroma3.it/centri/crei/pubblicazioni/workingpapers2007/CREI_01_2007.pdf
Panizza, U. (1999). On the determinants of fiscal centralization: Theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 74, 97-139.
Grazzi, M. & Jaramillo, F. (2015). Is Latin America on the path to achieving sustainable fiscal decentralization? In Faguet, J.P., & Pöschl, C. (Eds.). Is decentralization good for development? Perspectives from academics and policy makers (pp. 109-128). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rodden, J. (2004). Comparative federalism and decentralization: On meaning and measurement. Comparative Politics, 36(4), 481-500.
Tiebout, C.M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424.
Samuelson, P.A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387-389.
Smoke, P. (2015). Rethinking decentralization: Assessing challenges to a popular public sector reform. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 97-112.
Stegarescu, D. (2009). The effects of economic and political integration on fiscal decentralization: Evidence from OECD countries. Canadian Journal of Economics, 42(2), 694-718.
Fedelino, A. & Smoke, P. (2013). Bridging public financial management and fiscal decentralization reforms in developing countries. In Cangiano, M.M., Curristine, M.T.R., &. Lazare, M.M. (Eds.). Public financial management and its emerging architecture (pp. 363-388). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Gadenne, L., & Singhal, M. (2014). Decentralization in developing economies. Annual Review of Economics, 6, 581-604.
Cai, H., & Treisman, D. (2006). Did government decentralization cause China’s economic miracle? World Politics, 5(4), 505-535.
Faguet, J.P., & Pöschl, C. (2015). Is decentralization good for development? Perspectives from academics and policy makers. In Faguet, J.P. & Pöschl, C. (eds.). Is decentralization good for development? Perspectives from academics and policy makers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/2656
This paper analyzes the main determinants of fiscal decentralization in a sample of eighty-four countries. Theempirical findings show that the most consistent variable affecting fiscal decentralization is the size of a country: as land size increases, the level of fiscal decentralization increases as well. Countries with higher income equality, an educated population, more democratic, more urbanized and open to trade are also more likely to be more decentralized, though the findings demonstrate that there are regional and income variations. The most important policy implication is that governments interested in deepening the devolutionof fiscal responsibilities to sub-national levels may consider acting to affect those variables that have been shown to exert a positive influence on this process.
Fiscal decentralization
Federalism
Regional autonomy
Journal article
application/pdf
text/html
Faguet, J.P. (2014). Decentralization and governance. World Development, 53, 2-13.
Publication
Inglés
Arzaghi, M., & Henderson, V. (2005). Why countries are fiscally decentralizing. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1157-1189.
Channa, A., & Faguet, J.P. (2016). Decentralization of health and education in developing countries: A Quality-adjusted review of the empirical literature. World Bank Research Observer, 31(2), 199-241.
Canavire-Bacarreza, G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Yedgenov, B. (2017). Reexamining the determinants of fiscal decentralization: What is the role of geography? Journal of Economic Geography, 17(6), 1209-1249.
The empirical evidence on the determinants of fiscal decentralization
Bodman, P., & Hodge, A. (2010). What drives fiscal decentralisation? Further assessing the role of income. Fiscal Studies, 31(3), 373-404.
Alesina, A., & Spolaore, E. (2003). The size of nations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2656/3422
https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2656/3517
https://doi.org/10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v12.n1.2020.2656
2020-01-01
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
302
2248-6046
271
10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v12.n1.2020.2656
2011-7663
institution UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADCATOLICADECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista Finanzas y Política Económica
title La evidencia empírica sobre las determinantes de la descentralización fiscal
spellingShingle La evidencia empírica sobre las determinantes de la descentralización fiscal
Bojanic, Antonio Nicolás
Autonomía regional
Desentralización fiscal
Federalismo
Fiscal decentralization
Federalism
Regional autonomy
title_short La evidencia empírica sobre las determinantes de la descentralización fiscal
title_full La evidencia empírica sobre las determinantes de la descentralización fiscal
title_fullStr La evidencia empírica sobre las determinantes de la descentralización fiscal
title_full_unstemmed La evidencia empírica sobre las determinantes de la descentralización fiscal
title_sort la evidencia empírica sobre las determinantes de la descentralización fiscal
title_eng The empirical evidence on the determinants of fiscal decentralization
description Este artículo analiza las principales determinantes de descentralización fiscal en una muestra de 84 países. Los resultados empíricos demuestran que el tamaño geográfico de un país es la variable que con mayor consistencia afecta el nivel de descentralización fiscal. Países con mayor equidad en la distribución del ingreso, con niveles de educación altos, más democráticos, más urbanizados y abiertos al comercio internacional tienden a ser más descentralizados, aunque los resultados demuestran que existen variaciones  en el patrón de comportamiento a nivel regional y de ingreso. La implicación de política más importante es que aquellos países interesados en descentralizar funciones gubernamentales deberían considerar actuar sobre aquellas variables que han demostrado tener una influencia positiva sobre este proceso.
description_eng This paper analyzes the main determinants of fiscal decentralization in a sample of eighty-four countries. Theempirical findings show that the most consistent variable affecting fiscal decentralization is the size of a country: as land size increases, the level of fiscal decentralization increases as well. Countries with higher income equality, an educated population, more democratic, more urbanized and open to trade are also more likely to be more decentralized, though the findings demonstrate that there are regional and income variations. The most important policy implication is that governments interested in deepening the devolutionof fiscal responsibilities to sub-national levels may consider acting to affect those variables that have been shown to exert a positive influence on this process.
author Bojanic, Antonio Nicolás
author_facet Bojanic, Antonio Nicolás
topicspa_str_mv Autonomía regional
Desentralización fiscal
Federalismo
topic Autonomía regional
Desentralización fiscal
Federalismo
Fiscal decentralization
Federalism
Regional autonomy
topic_facet Autonomía regional
Desentralización fiscal
Federalismo
Fiscal decentralization
Federalism
Regional autonomy
citationvolume 12
citationissue 1
publisher Universidad Católica de Colombia
ispartofjournal Revista Finanzas y Política Económica
source https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/2656
language Inglés
format Article
rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
references_eng Letelier, L.S. (2005). Explaining fiscal decentralization. Public Finance Review, 33(2), 155-183.
Jílek, M. (2015). Factors of tax decentralization in OECD-Europe countries. European Financial and Accounting Journal, 10(2), 33-49.
Treisman, D. (2006). Explaining fiscal decentralisation: Geography, colonial history, economic development and political institutions. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 44:3, pp. 289-325.
Jametti, M., & Joanis, M. (2010). Determinants of fiscal decentralization: Political economy aspects. Document de treball de l’IEB 2010/7. Institut d’Economia de Barcelona. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46469104_Determinants_of_fiscal_decentralization_political_economy_aspects
Musgrave, R. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Musgrave, R. (1969). Theories of fiscal federalism. Public Finance, 24(4), 521-536.
Oates, W.E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,
Oates, W.E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120-1149.
Oates, W.E. (2007). On the theory and practice of fiscal Decentralization. CREI Working Paper no 1/2007. Retrieved from http://host.uniroma3.it/centri/crei/pubblicazioni/workingpapers2007/CREI_01_2007.pdf
Panizza, U. (1999). On the determinants of fiscal centralization: Theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 74, 97-139.
Grazzi, M. & Jaramillo, F. (2015). Is Latin America on the path to achieving sustainable fiscal decentralization? In Faguet, J.P., & Pöschl, C. (Eds.). Is decentralization good for development? Perspectives from academics and policy makers (pp. 109-128). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rodden, J. (2004). Comparative federalism and decentralization: On meaning and measurement. Comparative Politics, 36(4), 481-500.
Tiebout, C.M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424.
Samuelson, P.A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387-389.
Smoke, P. (2015). Rethinking decentralization: Assessing challenges to a popular public sector reform. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 97-112.
Stegarescu, D. (2009). The effects of economic and political integration on fiscal decentralization: Evidence from OECD countries. Canadian Journal of Economics, 42(2), 694-718.
Fedelino, A. & Smoke, P. (2013). Bridging public financial management and fiscal decentralization reforms in developing countries. In Cangiano, M.M., Curristine, M.T.R., &. Lazare, M.M. (Eds.). Public financial management and its emerging architecture (pp. 363-388). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Gadenne, L., & Singhal, M. (2014). Decentralization in developing economies. Annual Review of Economics, 6, 581-604.
Cai, H., & Treisman, D. (2006). Did government decentralization cause China’s economic miracle? World Politics, 5(4), 505-535.
Faguet, J.P., & Pöschl, C. (2015). Is decentralization good for development? Perspectives from academics and policy makers. In Faguet, J.P. & Pöschl, C. (eds.). Is decentralization good for development? Perspectives from academics and policy makers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Faguet, J.P. (2014). Decentralization and governance. World Development, 53, 2-13.
Arzaghi, M., & Henderson, V. (2005). Why countries are fiscally decentralizing. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1157-1189.
Channa, A., & Faguet, J.P. (2016). Decentralization of health and education in developing countries: A Quality-adjusted review of the empirical literature. World Bank Research Observer, 31(2), 199-241.
Canavire-Bacarreza, G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Yedgenov, B. (2017). Reexamining the determinants of fiscal decentralization: What is the role of geography? Journal of Economic Geography, 17(6), 1209-1249.
Bodman, P., & Hodge, A. (2010). What drives fiscal decentralisation? Further assessing the role of income. Fiscal Studies, 31(3), 373-404.
Alesina, A., & Spolaore, E. (2003). The size of nations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2020-01-01
date_accessioned 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/2656
url_doi https://doi.org/10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v12.n1.2020.2656
issn 2248-6046
eissn 2011-7663
doi 10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v12.n1.2020.2656
citationstartpage 271
citationendpage 302
url2_str_mv https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2656/3422
url3_str_mv https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2656/3517
_version_ 1797158462645338112