Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad.

Se toman como punto de partida las "contracorrientes" que visionaba Gui Bonsiepe en 1978, sobre la práctica del design. Se revisa el perfeccionamiento de esas ideas a partir de la evolución del concepto de sostenibilidad, su enfoque social y su relación con la innovación y el design. En correspondencia con los planteamientos de Bonsiepe, se identifican cambios en el papel del design para atender nuevas necesidades sociales; como ejemplos se presentan intervenciones de design participativo e innovación social, que generan alternativas de desarrollo local en la ciudad contemporánea. Nuevas realidades hacen más importantes... Ver más

Guardado en:

1657-0308

2357-626X

19

2017-10-17

68

77

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Pedro Arturo Martínez-Osorio - 2017

id 5128ce019d847338d63c12bca017e1fd
record_format ojs
spelling Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad.
Marttila, S. y Botero, A. (2016). Bees, drones and other Things in public space: strategizing in the city. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.03
Patarakin, Y. y Shilova, O. (2015). Concept of learning design for collaborative network activity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 1083-1090.
Pacheco, J. C., Barrero, G. E. y Gómez Vásquez, G. (2013). An eco-technological approach to handcraft production: Two cases in the colombian caribbean region. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 10 (spe70), 115-129. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0122-14502013000100006&lng=en&tlng=en
Navastara, A. M., Pradinie, K. y Martha, K. E. (2016). Ambiguous public space towards social sustainability in madurese urban Kampong. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.108
Napawan, N. C. y Snyder, B. (2016). # FOGWASTE: Participatory urbanism towards place-understanding. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 67. Recuperado de http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/sdrj/article/view/sdrj.2016.92.02
Mulgan G., Tucker, A. R. y Sanders, B. (2007). Social Innovation. What is it, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. London: The Basingstoke Press, The Young Foundation. Recuperado de http://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Social-Innovation-what-it-is-why-it-matters-how-it-can-be-accelerated-March-2007.pdf
Moura M., Pereira de Andrade, A. B., Jardim Tarozzo, M. y Muniz Ambiel, I. Design contemporâneo e o resgate da memória: projeto interdisciplinar, 12° Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design, Blucher Design Proceedings,2, 2869-2881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/despro-ped2016-0246
Monteiro, B. G. y Wagner, R. (2008)Design e inovação social. Estudos em Design, 16 (2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5151/9788580392647-01
McKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: Towards some definitions. Working Paper Series, 27. Magill, South Australia: Hawke Research Institute. University of South Australia. Recuperado de http://w3.unisa.edu.au/hawkeinstitute/publications/downloads/wp27.pdf
Mcdonough, W. y Braungart, M. (2013). Cradle to cradle: criar e reciclar ilimitadamente. São Paulo: Gustavo Gili.
Matei, C. S. (2014). Globalization - An Anthropological Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 542 -546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbs-pro.2014.08.207
Manzini, E. y Vezzoli, C. (2002). O desenvolvimento de produtos sustentáveis. Os requisitos ambientais dos produtos industriais. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.
Papanek, V. (1995). Arquitectura e Design -Ecologia e ética. Lisboa: Edições 70 (reimpresión 2007).
Manzini, E. (2014). Design in a changing, connected world. Strategic Design Research Journal, 7 (2), 95-99. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2014.72.06
Manzini, E. (2009). New design knowledge. Design Studies, 30 (1), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.001
Lydon, M., Bartman, D., Woudstra, R. y Khawazard, A. (2012). Tactical urbanism 1. Shortterm action, long-term change. Street Plans Collective. Recuperado de https://issuu.com/streetplanscollaborative/docs/tactical_urbanism_vol.1.
Kelkar, N. P y Spinelli, G. (2016). Building social capital through creative placemaking. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9(2), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.01
Ibarra Muñoz, D. (2014). Desarrollo mundial evanescente. Economía UNAM, 11 (32), 3-20. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-952X2014000200001&lng=es&tlng
Huybrechts, L., Dreessen, K., Schepers, S. y Calderon, P. (2016). Democratic dialogues that make cities 'work'. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2),100-111 https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.05
Howaldt, J., Domanski, D. y Kaletka, C. (2016). Social innovation: Towards a new innovation paradigm. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17 (6), 20-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p20-44.
Hillgren, P. A. y Seravalli, A. (2016). Counterhegemonic practices; dynamic interplay between agonism, commoning and strategic design. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.04
Harazin, P. y Kósi, K. (2013). Social challenges: Social innovation through social responsibility. Periodica Polytechnica. Social and Management Sciences 21 (1), 27-38. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.3311/PPso.2154
Guimarães, L. B. M. (2009). Design e sustentabilidade: Brasil: produção e consumo, design sociotécnico. Porto Alegre: FEENG/UFRGS. Recuperado de https://estudo-semdesign.emnuvens.com.br/design/article/view/369
Phills J., Deiglmeier, K. y Miller, D. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Social Innovation Review (pp. 33-43). Stanford: Stanford University.
Pinho, M. (2013). Domingos Tótora. Rio de Janeiro: Papel & Tinta.
Abd Elrahman, Ahmed. (2016). Tactical urbanism "a pop-up local change for cairo's built environment". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216. https://doi.org/ Doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.032
Vilar, K. y Cartes, I. (2016). Urban design and social capital in slums. Case study: Moravia's neighborhood, Medellin, 2004-2014. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.008
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
WWF Brasil (2016). O planeta precisa de 1,5 anos para regenerar os recursos renováveis que consumimos em um ano. Recuperado de: http://www.wwf.org.br/natureza_brasi-leira/especiais/pegada_ecologica/pegada_ecologicaglobal/
Walker, S. (2014). Terra de resíduos: sustentabilidade e design com dignidade. Maria Cecília Loschiavo dos Santos. Design Resíduo & Dignidade (pp. 15-27). São Paulo: Olhares.
van Reusel, H. (2016). Wandering as a design strategy for infrastructuring. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 112-127. 2.https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.06
Pollice, F. (2016). Urban planning and architectural design for sustainable development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 6-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.068
Yair, K., Press, M., Tomes, A. (2001). Crafting competitive advantage: Crafts knowledge as a strategic resource. Design Studies, 22 (4), 377-394.
Unesco (2005). Designers meet artisans. A practical guide. New Delhi: Artesanías de Colombia, Unesco. Recuperado de: http://www.unesco.org/images/0014/001471/147132EO.pdf
Tung, F. W. (2012). Weaving with rush: Exploring Craft-design collaborations in revitalizing a local craft. International Journal of Design, 6 (3). Recuperado de http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/1077
Tyl, B., Lizarralde, I., Allais, R. (2015). Local value creation and eco-design: A new paradigm. Procedia CIRP, 30, 155-160. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.024
Selloni, D. y Manzini, E. (2016). Policy constellations as ecosystems of design actions: Exploring three cases of social innovation policies in Italy. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 128. https://doi.org/Doi:10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.07
Sarmah, B., Islam, J. U. y Rahman, Z. (2015). Sustainability, social responsibility and value co-creation: A case study based approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.227
Sanders, E. B. N. y Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4 (1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
Salonia, P. (2016). Tourism, migration, heritage, culture, inclusion: Recovering the memory of ourselves for the sustainable cities and the society of the XXI century. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 668-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.382
Sadat Sahragard Monfared, N., Hashemnejad, H. y Abbas Yazdanfar, S. (2015). Design principles in sustainable local community with security and socialization approach (Case study: Chizar). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201, 62-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.119.
Romeiro Filho, E. (2015). Brazilian design for sustainability: In search of a local approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 467-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.065
Felicetti, M. (2016). Cultural innovation and local development: Matera as a cultural district. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 614-618. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.366
Fuad-Luke, A. (2010). Ecodesign: The Sourcebook (3 ed., Fully Revised). San Francisco: Chronicle Books LLC.
El-Husseiny, M. A. y Kesseiba, K. (2012). Challenges of social sustainability in neo-liberal Cairo: Re-questioning the role of public space. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 790-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.267
Design participativo
text/html
Ekomadyo, A. y Yuliar, S. (2015). Social reassembling as design strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, 152-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.075
Artículo de revista
Núm. 2 , Año 2017 :Julio - diciembre
2
19
Sustentabilidade
Inovação social
Design
application/epub+zip
Sostenibilidad
Innovación social
Design participativo
Design
Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos
Roeha-Carneiro, Rodrigo
Barana, Mareia
Martínez-Osorio, Pedro Arturo
Se toman como punto de partida las "contracorrientes" que visionaba Gui Bonsiepe en 1978, sobre la práctica del design. Se revisa el perfeccionamiento de esas ideas a partir de la evolución del concepto de sostenibilidad, su enfoque social y su relación con la innovación y el design. En correspondencia con los planteamientos de Bonsiepe, se identifican cambios en el papel del design para atender nuevas necesidades sociales; como ejemplos se presentan intervenciones de design participativo e innovación social, que generan alternativas de desarrollo local en la ciudad contemporánea. Nuevas realidades hacen más importantes las capacidades de construcción de productos intangibles. La acción política del design es cada vez más urgente; los designers están llamados a cumplir un papel protagónico en la construcción crítica de la nueva ciudadanía. Un nuevo campo de acción, el design social.
application/pdf
Publication
application/xml
Español
Chen, D., Cheng, L., Hummels, C. y Koskinen, I. (2016). Social design: An introduction. International Journal of Design, 10, 1. Recuperado de: http://ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/2622
Campbell, W. (2014). Designs: An archaeology of "craft" as god term. Computers and Composition, 33, 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2014.07.002
Bonsiepe, G. (1978). Teoría y práctica del diseño industrial. Elementos para una manualística crítica. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
Bologna (2014). Bologna regulation on public collaboration for urban commons. Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna. LabGov - LABoratory for the GOVernance of commons. Recuperado de http://www.labgov.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/Bologna-Regulation-on-collaboration-between-citizens-and-the-city-for-the-cure-and-regeneration-of-urban-commons1.pdf.
Barbero, S. y Cozzo, B. (2009). Ecodesign. Kõnigswinter: H. F. Ullmann.
application/x-rar
Pedro Arturo Martínez-Osorio - 2017
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Alexandre, C. B., Gómez, E. A., Valente, A. C. (2015). Interdisciplinary relationship between Designer and Craftsman based on Integrated Craft Manufacturing Systems. Procedia Engineering, 132, 1089-1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.600
https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/1406
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Revista de Arquitectura (Bogotá)
Journal article
Social innovation
This paper takes as its point of departure the "counter-currents" envisioned by Gui Bonsiepe in 1978 regarding the practice of design. The development of these ideas is reviewed based on the evolution of the concept of sustainability, as well as its social approach and relationship with innovation and design. In line with Bonsiepe's ideas, the paper identifies changes in the role of design in order to meet new social needs; as examples, it presents interventions based on participatory design and social innovation, which generate alternatives for local development in the contemporary city. Due to new realities, the ability to construct intangible products is ever more important. The political action of design is more and more urgent; designers are called to play a leading role in the critical construction of new citizenship identities. A new field of action: social design.
Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad.
Design
Sustainability
Participatory design
2017-10-17
2017-10-17T00:00:00Z
2017-10-17T00:00:00Z
https://doi.org/10.14718/RevArq.2017.19.2.1406
https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/2784
https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/1950
10.14718/RevArq.2017.19.2.1406
https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/pdf-PedMar
https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/1674
1657-0308
77
68
2357-626X
https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/1895
institution UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADCATOLICADECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista de Arquitectura (Bogotá)
title Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad.
spellingShingle Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad.
Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos
Roeha-Carneiro, Rodrigo
Barana, Mareia
Martínez-Osorio, Pedro Arturo
Design participativo
Sustentabilidade
Inovação social
Design
Sostenibilidad
Innovación social
Design participativo
Design
Social innovation
Design
Sustainability
Participatory design
title_short Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad.
title_full Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad.
title_fullStr Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad.
title_full_unstemmed Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad.
title_sort innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad.
title_eng Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad.
description Se toman como punto de partida las "contracorrientes" que visionaba Gui Bonsiepe en 1978, sobre la práctica del design. Se revisa el perfeccionamiento de esas ideas a partir de la evolución del concepto de sostenibilidad, su enfoque social y su relación con la innovación y el design. En correspondencia con los planteamientos de Bonsiepe, se identifican cambios en el papel del design para atender nuevas necesidades sociales; como ejemplos se presentan intervenciones de design participativo e innovación social, que generan alternativas de desarrollo local en la ciudad contemporánea. Nuevas realidades hacen más importantes las capacidades de construcción de productos intangibles. La acción política del design es cada vez más urgente; los designers están llamados a cumplir un papel protagónico en la construcción crítica de la nueva ciudadanía. Un nuevo campo de acción, el design social.
description_eng This paper takes as its point of departure the "counter-currents" envisioned by Gui Bonsiepe in 1978 regarding the practice of design. The development of these ideas is reviewed based on the evolution of the concept of sustainability, as well as its social approach and relationship with innovation and design. In line with Bonsiepe's ideas, the paper identifies changes in the role of design in order to meet new social needs; as examples, it presents interventions based on participatory design and social innovation, which generate alternatives for local development in the contemporary city. Due to new realities, the ability to construct intangible products is ever more important. The political action of design is more and more urgent; designers are called to play a leading role in the critical construction of new citizenship identities. A new field of action: social design.
author Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos
Roeha-Carneiro, Rodrigo
Barana, Mareia
Martínez-Osorio, Pedro Arturo
author_facet Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos
Roeha-Carneiro, Rodrigo
Barana, Mareia
Martínez-Osorio, Pedro Arturo
topicspa_str_mv Design participativo
Sustentabilidade
Inovação social
Design
Sostenibilidad
Innovación social
Design participativo
Design
topic Design participativo
Sustentabilidade
Inovação social
Design
Sostenibilidad
Innovación social
Design participativo
Design
Social innovation
Design
Sustainability
Participatory design
topic_facet Design participativo
Sustentabilidade
Inovação social
Design
Sostenibilidad
Innovación social
Design participativo
Design
Social innovation
Design
Sustainability
Participatory design
citationvolume 19
citationissue 2
citationedition Núm. 2 , Año 2017 :Julio - diciembre
publisher Universidad Católica de Colombia
ispartofjournal Revista de Arquitectura (Bogotá)
source https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/1406
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Pedro Arturo Martínez-Osorio - 2017
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
references Marttila, S. y Botero, A. (2016). Bees, drones and other Things in public space: strategizing in the city. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.03
Patarakin, Y. y Shilova, O. (2015). Concept of learning design for collaborative network activity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 1083-1090.
Pacheco, J. C., Barrero, G. E. y Gómez Vásquez, G. (2013). An eco-technological approach to handcraft production: Two cases in the colombian caribbean region. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 10 (spe70), 115-129. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0122-14502013000100006&lng=en&tlng=en
Navastara, A. M., Pradinie, K. y Martha, K. E. (2016). Ambiguous public space towards social sustainability in madurese urban Kampong. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.108
Napawan, N. C. y Snyder, B. (2016). # FOGWASTE: Participatory urbanism towards place-understanding. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 67. Recuperado de http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/sdrj/article/view/sdrj.2016.92.02
Mulgan G., Tucker, A. R. y Sanders, B. (2007). Social Innovation. What is it, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. London: The Basingstoke Press, The Young Foundation. Recuperado de http://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Social-Innovation-what-it-is-why-it-matters-how-it-can-be-accelerated-March-2007.pdf
Moura M., Pereira de Andrade, A. B., Jardim Tarozzo, M. y Muniz Ambiel, I. Design contemporâneo e o resgate da memória: projeto interdisciplinar, 12° Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design, Blucher Design Proceedings,2, 2869-2881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/despro-ped2016-0246
Monteiro, B. G. y Wagner, R. (2008)Design e inovação social. Estudos em Design, 16 (2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5151/9788580392647-01
McKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: Towards some definitions. Working Paper Series, 27. Magill, South Australia: Hawke Research Institute. University of South Australia. Recuperado de http://w3.unisa.edu.au/hawkeinstitute/publications/downloads/wp27.pdf
Mcdonough, W. y Braungart, M. (2013). Cradle to cradle: criar e reciclar ilimitadamente. São Paulo: Gustavo Gili.
Matei, C. S. (2014). Globalization - An Anthropological Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 542 -546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbs-pro.2014.08.207
Manzini, E. y Vezzoli, C. (2002). O desenvolvimento de produtos sustentáveis. Os requisitos ambientais dos produtos industriais. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.
Papanek, V. (1995). Arquitectura e Design -Ecologia e ética. Lisboa: Edições 70 (reimpresión 2007).
Manzini, E. (2014). Design in a changing, connected world. Strategic Design Research Journal, 7 (2), 95-99. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2014.72.06
Manzini, E. (2009). New design knowledge. Design Studies, 30 (1), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.001
Lydon, M., Bartman, D., Woudstra, R. y Khawazard, A. (2012). Tactical urbanism 1. Shortterm action, long-term change. Street Plans Collective. Recuperado de https://issuu.com/streetplanscollaborative/docs/tactical_urbanism_vol.1.
Kelkar, N. P y Spinelli, G. (2016). Building social capital through creative placemaking. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9(2), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.01
Ibarra Muñoz, D. (2014). Desarrollo mundial evanescente. Economía UNAM, 11 (32), 3-20. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-952X2014000200001&lng=es&tlng
Huybrechts, L., Dreessen, K., Schepers, S. y Calderon, P. (2016). Democratic dialogues that make cities 'work'. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2),100-111 https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.05
Howaldt, J., Domanski, D. y Kaletka, C. (2016). Social innovation: Towards a new innovation paradigm. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17 (6), 20-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p20-44.
Hillgren, P. A. y Seravalli, A. (2016). Counterhegemonic practices; dynamic interplay between agonism, commoning and strategic design. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.04
Harazin, P. y Kósi, K. (2013). Social challenges: Social innovation through social responsibility. Periodica Polytechnica. Social and Management Sciences 21 (1), 27-38. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.3311/PPso.2154
Guimarães, L. B. M. (2009). Design e sustentabilidade: Brasil: produção e consumo, design sociotécnico. Porto Alegre: FEENG/UFRGS. Recuperado de https://estudo-semdesign.emnuvens.com.br/design/article/view/369
Phills J., Deiglmeier, K. y Miller, D. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Social Innovation Review (pp. 33-43). Stanford: Stanford University.
Pinho, M. (2013). Domingos Tótora. Rio de Janeiro: Papel & Tinta.
Abd Elrahman, Ahmed. (2016). Tactical urbanism "a pop-up local change for cairo's built environment". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216. https://doi.org/ Doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.032
Vilar, K. y Cartes, I. (2016). Urban design and social capital in slums. Case study: Moravia's neighborhood, Medellin, 2004-2014. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.008
WWF Brasil (2016). O planeta precisa de 1,5 anos para regenerar os recursos renováveis que consumimos em um ano. Recuperado de: http://www.wwf.org.br/natureza_brasi-leira/especiais/pegada_ecologica/pegada_ecologicaglobal/
Walker, S. (2014). Terra de resíduos: sustentabilidade e design com dignidade. Maria Cecília Loschiavo dos Santos. Design Resíduo & Dignidade (pp. 15-27). São Paulo: Olhares.
van Reusel, H. (2016). Wandering as a design strategy for infrastructuring. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 112-127. 2.https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.06
Pollice, F. (2016). Urban planning and architectural design for sustainable development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 6-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.068
Yair, K., Press, M., Tomes, A. (2001). Crafting competitive advantage: Crafts knowledge as a strategic resource. Design Studies, 22 (4), 377-394.
Unesco (2005). Designers meet artisans. A practical guide. New Delhi: Artesanías de Colombia, Unesco. Recuperado de: http://www.unesco.org/images/0014/001471/147132EO.pdf
Tung, F. W. (2012). Weaving with rush: Exploring Craft-design collaborations in revitalizing a local craft. International Journal of Design, 6 (3). Recuperado de http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/1077
Tyl, B., Lizarralde, I., Allais, R. (2015). Local value creation and eco-design: A new paradigm. Procedia CIRP, 30, 155-160. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.024
Selloni, D. y Manzini, E. (2016). Policy constellations as ecosystems of design actions: Exploring three cases of social innovation policies in Italy. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 128. https://doi.org/Doi:10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.07
Sarmah, B., Islam, J. U. y Rahman, Z. (2015). Sustainability, social responsibility and value co-creation: A case study based approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.227
Sanders, E. B. N. y Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4 (1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
Salonia, P. (2016). Tourism, migration, heritage, culture, inclusion: Recovering the memory of ourselves for the sustainable cities and the society of the XXI century. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 668-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.382
Sadat Sahragard Monfared, N., Hashemnejad, H. y Abbas Yazdanfar, S. (2015). Design principles in sustainable local community with security and socialization approach (Case study: Chizar). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201, 62-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.119.
Romeiro Filho, E. (2015). Brazilian design for sustainability: In search of a local approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 467-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.065
Felicetti, M. (2016). Cultural innovation and local development: Matera as a cultural district. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 614-618. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.366
Fuad-Luke, A. (2010). Ecodesign: The Sourcebook (3 ed., Fully Revised). San Francisco: Chronicle Books LLC.
El-Husseiny, M. A. y Kesseiba, K. (2012). Challenges of social sustainability in neo-liberal Cairo: Re-questioning the role of public space. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 790-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.267
Ekomadyo, A. y Yuliar, S. (2015). Social reassembling as design strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, 152-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.075
Chen, D., Cheng, L., Hummels, C. y Koskinen, I. (2016). Social design: An introduction. International Journal of Design, 10, 1. Recuperado de: http://ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/2622
Campbell, W. (2014). Designs: An archaeology of "craft" as god term. Computers and Composition, 33, 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2014.07.002
Bonsiepe, G. (1978). Teoría y práctica del diseño industrial. Elementos para una manualística crítica. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
Bologna (2014). Bologna regulation on public collaboration for urban commons. Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna. LabGov - LABoratory for the GOVernance of commons. Recuperado de http://www.labgov.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/Bologna-Regulation-on-collaboration-between-citizens-and-the-city-for-the-cure-and-regeneration-of-urban-commons1.pdf.
Barbero, S. y Cozzo, B. (2009). Ecodesign. Kõnigswinter: H. F. Ullmann.
Alexandre, C. B., Gómez, E. A., Valente, A. C. (2015). Interdisciplinary relationship between Designer and Craftsman based on Integrated Craft Manufacturing Systems. Procedia Engineering, 132, 1089-1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.600
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2017-10-17
date_accessioned 2017-10-17T00:00:00Z
date_available 2017-10-17T00:00:00Z
url https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/1406
url_doi https://doi.org/10.14718/RevArq.2017.19.2.1406
issn 1657-0308
eissn 2357-626X
doi 10.14718/RevArq.2017.19.2.1406
citationstartpage 68
citationendpage 77
url4_str_mv https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/1950
url2_str_mv https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/pdf-PedMar
url3_str_mv https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/1674
url5_str_mv https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/1895
_version_ 1797158650844807168