Allusions to henotheism and monotheism in cicero's book II of the nature of the gods.

A la luz de una profunda exégesis de la teología ontológica estoica, el libro II de Sobre la naturaleza de los dioses de Cicerón, constituye una investigación de la naturaleza de lo divino en términos de su existencia, sus funciones, y las bendiciones que confiere sobre la humanidad. Permite una comprensión sustancial de la tesis más amplia de una justificación teórica de la esencia de lo divino, conceptualizada en la forma de un ser supremo divino, el principio que gobierna un cosmos articulado de manera divina, al igual que una serie de arquetipos subsidiarios que emanan su iluminación eterna y simultáneamente. A pesar de la dificultad para detectar la extensión y los grados de los asuntos clave relacionados con... Ver más

Guardado en:

0124-6127

2462-9596

10

2009-01-01

27

42

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Discusiones Filosóficas - 2009

id 48632cc3f9e1a8c17d2ab2824cf11100
record_format ojs
spelling Allusions to henotheism and monotheism in cicero's book II of the nature of the gods.
lo divino
10
Artículo de revista
Universidad de Caldas
Núm. 14 , Año 2009 : Enero - Junio
posidonio
verdad teológica
monoteísmo
henoteísmo
Cicerón
Gamlath, Isha
Discusiones Filosóficas
A la luz de una profunda exégesis de la teología ontológica estoica, el libro II de Sobre la naturaleza de los dioses de Cicerón, constituye una investigación de la naturaleza de lo divino en términos de su existencia, sus funciones, y las bendiciones que confiere sobre la humanidad. Permite una comprensión sustancial de la tesis más amplia de una justificación teórica de la esencia de lo divino, conceptualizada en la forma de un ser supremo divino, el principio que gobierna un cosmos articulado de manera divina, al igual que una serie de arquetipos subsidiarios que emanan su iluminación eterna y simultáneamente. A pesar de la dificultad para detectar la extensión y los grados de los asuntos clave relacionados con los criterios de una verdad teológica en Cicerón i.e. la derivación de conceptos platónicos, la influencia de las modificaciones ortodoxas de los estoicos tardíos y los precursores del neo-estoicismo, Posidonio y su defensa metodológica que confirma las doctrinas estoicas en las que sobreviven alusiones a los conceptos religiosos acuñados apenas en el siglo XVII AD como henoteismo y monoteísmo, este artículo explora los grados de reflexión de estos conceptos religiosos postulados en el marco teórico del libro II de Sobre la Naturaleza de los dioses (2. 1-3-2.167-168) al igual que su conceptualización teológica de lo divino.
14
POWEL, J. & PATTERSON, J. (2004). Cicero the advocate. Oxford: University Press.
PORPHYRY. (1965). On the abstinence of animal food. Taylor, T. (Tr). London: Centaur Press.
MAZUN, Z. (2004). "Unio magica II Plotinus, theurgy and the question of ritual". In: Dionysos 22. Canada.
MAY, J. (2006). "Cicero". In: Classical Review. 56: 2. London: The Classical Association.
MACDONALD, N. (2004). "The origin of monotheism in early Jewish and Christian monotheism". In: STUCKEN BRUCK, L. & NORTH, W. (Eds). Early Jewish and Chritian monotheism. London: T&T Clark International. [ Links ]
HAHN, D. (1977). The origins of Stoic cosmology. Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
MAAS, M. (2000). Readings in late antiquity: a sourcebook. New York: Harvard University Press.
IAMBLICHUS. (2007). On the mysteries. Clarke, E. C. & Dillon J. M. (Trs). Atlanta: Hershbell.
PLOTINUS. (1965). Enneads. Taylor, T. (Tr). London.
GLADIGOW, B. (1993). Polytheism. Stuttgart, Berlin, Koln.
GAMLATH, I. & ADDEY, C. (2007). (forthcoming) "Daimones, divination and polytheism in Plutarch's moralia". Paper presented at the Theology and Religious Studies Postgraduate Day Conference. England: University of Bristol.
GAMLATH, I. (2007). Reception and the receptive in Iamblichus On the mysteries. India: Divyadan.
FOWDEN, G. (1991). "Constantine's porphyry column: the earliest literary allusion". In: Journal of Roman studies. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies.
CORNELIEUS, G. (2003). Moment of astrology: origin in divination. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
PLATO. (1995). Dialogues of Plato. Jowett, J. (Tr). New York: Clarendon University Press.
VERSNEL, H. (1990). Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman religion Vol. I. Leiden: Brill.
PLUTARCH. (2003). On the decline of oracles. Babbit, F. C. (Tr). London: Harvard University Press.
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
WALRAFF, M. (2003). Pagan monothism in late antiquity: remarks on a recent publication. Italy: Mediterrane Antico.
SHAW, G. (1999). "Eros and arithmos: Pythagorean theurgy". In: Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy No. 19. Oxford: University Press.
________. (2007). "Power of melancholy humour". In: Essay on astrology and divination. Cambridge: Scholars Press.
VOSS, A. (2000). "Astrology of Marsilio Ficino: divination or science?" In: Culture and Cosmos. 4: 2. Bristol: Sophia Centre for the Study of Cultural Astronomy and Astrology.
________. (1971). "De officiis". In: On the good life. Grant, M. (Tr). Bucks' Ltd.
STROUMSA, G. (1990). "Shaping the person in early Christian thought". In: Barbarian philosophy. The religious revolution of early christianity. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
STARK, R. (2001). One True God: Historical consequences of monotheism, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
SHEPPARD, A. (1993). "Iamblichus on Inspiration: De Mysteries, 3.4-8". In: BLUEMENTHAL, H. J. & CLARK, E. G. (Eds). The Divine Iamblichus: Pilosophers and man of gods. London: Bristol Classical Press.
________. (1972). The Nature of the Gods. Horace, C. & McGregor, P. (Trs). United Kingdom: Hazell Watson and Viney.
AUGUSTINE. (1984). City of God. Bettenson, H. (Tr). United Kingdom: Bungay and Suffolk.
________. (1971). "Dream of Scipio". In: On the good life. Rieu, V. (Tr). London: Penguin Books Ltd.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
In the light of a profound exegesis of Stoic ontological theology book II of Cicero's The Nature of the Gods is an inquiry into the nature of the divine in terms of its existence, functions and blessings conferred upon humankind. It provides substantial insight into his wider thesis of a theoretical justification of the essence of the divine conceptualized in the form of a Supreme Divine Being, the governing principle in a divinely articulated cosmos, as well as a host of subsidiary archetypes who eternally and simultaneously emanate its illumination. Despite the difficulty in detecting the extent and degrees of key issues related to Cicero's criteria of a theological truth, i.e. derivation of Platonic concepts, the influence of orthodox modifications of later Stoics and precursor of Neo Stoicism, Poseidonius and his methodological defense confirming Stoic doctrines there survives allusions to religious concepts coined not before the 17th century CE such as henotheism and monotheism. This paper explores the degrees of reflection of these religious concepts postulated within the theoretical framework of book II of The Nature of the Gods (2. 1-3-2.167-168) as well as his theological conceptualization of the divine.
Cicero
henotheism
monotheism
Poseidonius
the divine
theological truth
-
Journal article
application/pdf
________. (1928). Laws. Keyes, C. A. (Tr). New York: Harvard University Press.
Inglés
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/695
Discusiones Filosóficas - 2009
ATHANASSIADI, P. (1993) "Dreams, theurgy and freelance divination: the testimony of Iamblichus". In: Journal of Roman Studies No. 83. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies.
________. (1928). Republic. Keyes, C. A. (Tr). New York: Harvard University Press.
CICERO. (1923). De Divinatione. Falcon, N. A. (Tr). Cambridge: University Press.
BETEGH, G. (2003). "Cosmological ethics in the Timaeus and early stoicism". In: Oxford studies in ancient philosophy. Vol. XXIV. Oxford: University Press.
BARTON, T. (1994). Ancient Astrology. London and New York: Routledge.
BARNES, T. (2001). "Monothestis all?" In: Phoenix. 55: 1-2. Toronto: Cassical Association of Canada.
Alusiones al henoteismo y el monoteísmo en el libro II de Sobre la Naturaleza de los dioses de Cicerón.
ATHANASSIADI, P. & FREDE, M. (1999). Pagan monotheim in late Antiquity. Oxford: University Press.
________. (2004). "Monotheism and Polytheism". In: JOHNSTON, S.L. (Ed). Religions of the ancient world. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Publication
ASSMAN, J. (1978). Map is not territory. Leiden: Brill.
27
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/695/618
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z
2009-01-01
0124-6127
2462-9596
42
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/695
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Discusiones Filosóficas
title Allusions to henotheism and monotheism in cicero's book II of the nature of the gods.
spellingShingle Allusions to henotheism and monotheism in cicero's book II of the nature of the gods.
Gamlath, Isha
lo divino
posidonio
verdad teológica
monoteísmo
henoteísmo
Cicerón
Cicero
henotheism
monotheism
Poseidonius
the divine
theological truth
title_short Allusions to henotheism and monotheism in cicero's book II of the nature of the gods.
title_full Allusions to henotheism and monotheism in cicero's book II of the nature of the gods.
title_fullStr Allusions to henotheism and monotheism in cicero's book II of the nature of the gods.
title_full_unstemmed Allusions to henotheism and monotheism in cicero's book II of the nature of the gods.
title_sort allusions to henotheism and monotheism in cicero's book ii of the nature of the gods.
title_eng Alusiones al henoteismo y el monoteísmo en el libro II de Sobre la Naturaleza de los dioses de Cicerón.
description A la luz de una profunda exégesis de la teología ontológica estoica, el libro II de Sobre la naturaleza de los dioses de Cicerón, constituye una investigación de la naturaleza de lo divino en términos de su existencia, sus funciones, y las bendiciones que confiere sobre la humanidad. Permite una comprensión sustancial de la tesis más amplia de una justificación teórica de la esencia de lo divino, conceptualizada en la forma de un ser supremo divino, el principio que gobierna un cosmos articulado de manera divina, al igual que una serie de arquetipos subsidiarios que emanan su iluminación eterna y simultáneamente. A pesar de la dificultad para detectar la extensión y los grados de los asuntos clave relacionados con los criterios de una verdad teológica en Cicerón i.e. la derivación de conceptos platónicos, la influencia de las modificaciones ortodoxas de los estoicos tardíos y los precursores del neo-estoicismo, Posidonio y su defensa metodológica que confirma las doctrinas estoicas en las que sobreviven alusiones a los conceptos religiosos acuñados apenas en el siglo XVII AD como henoteismo y monoteísmo, este artículo explora los grados de reflexión de estos conceptos religiosos postulados en el marco teórico del libro II de Sobre la Naturaleza de los dioses (2. 1-3-2.167-168) al igual que su conceptualización teológica de lo divino.
description_eng In the light of a profound exegesis of Stoic ontological theology book II of Cicero's The Nature of the Gods is an inquiry into the nature of the divine in terms of its existence, functions and blessings conferred upon humankind. It provides substantial insight into his wider thesis of a theoretical justification of the essence of the divine conceptualized in the form of a Supreme Divine Being, the governing principle in a divinely articulated cosmos, as well as a host of subsidiary archetypes who eternally and simultaneously emanate its illumination. Despite the difficulty in detecting the extent and degrees of key issues related to Cicero's criteria of a theological truth, i.e. derivation of Platonic concepts, the influence of orthodox modifications of later Stoics and precursor of Neo Stoicism, Poseidonius and his methodological defense confirming Stoic doctrines there survives allusions to religious concepts coined not before the 17th century CE such as henotheism and monotheism. This paper explores the degrees of reflection of these religious concepts postulated within the theoretical framework of book II of The Nature of the Gods (2. 1-3-2.167-168) as well as his theological conceptualization of the divine.
author Gamlath, Isha
author_facet Gamlath, Isha
topicspa_str_mv lo divino
posidonio
verdad teológica
monoteísmo
henoteísmo
Cicerón
topic lo divino
posidonio
verdad teológica
monoteísmo
henoteísmo
Cicerón
Cicero
henotheism
monotheism
Poseidonius
the divine
theological truth
topic_facet lo divino
posidonio
verdad teológica
monoteísmo
henoteísmo
Cicerón
Cicero
henotheism
monotheism
Poseidonius
the divine
theological truth
citationvolume 10
citationissue 14
citationedition Núm. 14 , Año 2009 : Enero - Junio
publisher Universidad de Caldas
ispartofjournal Discusiones Filosóficas
source https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/695
language Inglés
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Discusiones Filosóficas - 2009
references_eng POWEL, J. & PATTERSON, J. (2004). Cicero the advocate. Oxford: University Press.
PORPHYRY. (1965). On the abstinence of animal food. Taylor, T. (Tr). London: Centaur Press.
MAZUN, Z. (2004). "Unio magica II Plotinus, theurgy and the question of ritual". In: Dionysos 22. Canada.
MAY, J. (2006). "Cicero". In: Classical Review. 56: 2. London: The Classical Association.
MACDONALD, N. (2004). "The origin of monotheism in early Jewish and Christian monotheism". In: STUCKEN BRUCK, L. & NORTH, W. (Eds). Early Jewish and Chritian monotheism. London: T&T Clark International. [ Links ]
HAHN, D. (1977). The origins of Stoic cosmology. Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
MAAS, M. (2000). Readings in late antiquity: a sourcebook. New York: Harvard University Press.
IAMBLICHUS. (2007). On the mysteries. Clarke, E. C. & Dillon J. M. (Trs). Atlanta: Hershbell.
PLOTINUS. (1965). Enneads. Taylor, T. (Tr). London.
GLADIGOW, B. (1993). Polytheism. Stuttgart, Berlin, Koln.
GAMLATH, I. & ADDEY, C. (2007). (forthcoming) "Daimones, divination and polytheism in Plutarch's moralia". Paper presented at the Theology and Religious Studies Postgraduate Day Conference. England: University of Bristol.
GAMLATH, I. (2007). Reception and the receptive in Iamblichus On the mysteries. India: Divyadan.
FOWDEN, G. (1991). "Constantine's porphyry column: the earliest literary allusion". In: Journal of Roman studies. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies.
CORNELIEUS, G. (2003). Moment of astrology: origin in divination. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
PLATO. (1995). Dialogues of Plato. Jowett, J. (Tr). New York: Clarendon University Press.
VERSNEL, H. (1990). Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman religion Vol. I. Leiden: Brill.
PLUTARCH. (2003). On the decline of oracles. Babbit, F. C. (Tr). London: Harvard University Press.
WALRAFF, M. (2003). Pagan monothism in late antiquity: remarks on a recent publication. Italy: Mediterrane Antico.
SHAW, G. (1999). "Eros and arithmos: Pythagorean theurgy". In: Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy No. 19. Oxford: University Press.
________. (2007). "Power of melancholy humour". In: Essay on astrology and divination. Cambridge: Scholars Press.
VOSS, A. (2000). "Astrology of Marsilio Ficino: divination or science?" In: Culture and Cosmos. 4: 2. Bristol: Sophia Centre for the Study of Cultural Astronomy and Astrology.
________. (1971). "De officiis". In: On the good life. Grant, M. (Tr). Bucks' Ltd.
STROUMSA, G. (1990). "Shaping the person in early Christian thought". In: Barbarian philosophy. The religious revolution of early christianity. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
STARK, R. (2001). One True God: Historical consequences of monotheism, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
SHEPPARD, A. (1993). "Iamblichus on Inspiration: De Mysteries, 3.4-8". In: BLUEMENTHAL, H. J. & CLARK, E. G. (Eds). The Divine Iamblichus: Pilosophers and man of gods. London: Bristol Classical Press.
________. (1972). The Nature of the Gods. Horace, C. & McGregor, P. (Trs). United Kingdom: Hazell Watson and Viney.
AUGUSTINE. (1984). City of God. Bettenson, H. (Tr). United Kingdom: Bungay and Suffolk.
________. (1971). "Dream of Scipio". In: On the good life. Rieu, V. (Tr). London: Penguin Books Ltd.
________. (1928). Laws. Keyes, C. A. (Tr). New York: Harvard University Press.
ATHANASSIADI, P. (1993) "Dreams, theurgy and freelance divination: the testimony of Iamblichus". In: Journal of Roman Studies No. 83. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies.
________. (1928). Republic. Keyes, C. A. (Tr). New York: Harvard University Press.
CICERO. (1923). De Divinatione. Falcon, N. A. (Tr). Cambridge: University Press.
BETEGH, G. (2003). "Cosmological ethics in the Timaeus and early stoicism". In: Oxford studies in ancient philosophy. Vol. XXIV. Oxford: University Press.
BARTON, T. (1994). Ancient Astrology. London and New York: Routledge.
BARNES, T. (2001). "Monothestis all?" In: Phoenix. 55: 1-2. Toronto: Cassical Association of Canada.
ATHANASSIADI, P. & FREDE, M. (1999). Pagan monotheim in late Antiquity. Oxford: University Press.
________. (2004). "Monotheism and Polytheism". In: JOHNSTON, S.L. (Ed). Religions of the ancient world. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
ASSMAN, J. (1978). Map is not territory. Leiden: Brill.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2009-01-01
date_accessioned 2009-01-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2009-01-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/695
url_doi https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/695
issn 0124-6127
eissn 2462-9596
citationstartpage 27
citationendpage 42
url2_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/695/618
_version_ 1797158006540992512