Servicios ecosistémicos culturales y métodos de valoración: una revisión sistemática

Servicios ecosistémicos culturales y métodos de valoración: una revisión sistemática

Los servicios ecosistémicos culturales (SEC) están asociados a la valoración humana no material de lugares y ecosistemas. En este artículo se realiza una revisión siste­mática acerca de las investigaciones que abordan como tema los SEC y métodos de valoración. Las informaciones se obtuvie­ron de las bases de datos Web of Science y Scopus con los siguientes términos de búsqueda: “cultural ecosystem services” y «“cultural ecosystem services” and “valuation methods”». La investigación fue realizada en títulos, resúmenes y palabras clave de artículos científicos. Se utilizaron las recomendaciones metodológicas de la Declaración PRISMA y se aplicaron criterios de exclusion; en total, 954 artículos fueron incluidos para esta revisión. Finalmente,... Ver más

Guardado en:

Turismo y Sociedad

0120-7555

2346-206X

Matos Márquez, Laura Andreína

Bardella Castro, Joana D’Arc

Emilly Layne Martins

UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA

10.18601/01207555.n34.04

34

2023-12-12

111

126

Colombia

beneficios intangibles,

complejidad operativa

subjetividad,

ecosistemas,

servicios no materiales,

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Laura Andreína Matos Márquez, Joana D’Arc Bardella Castro, Emilly Layne Martins - 2023

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

id 47a188e49e699c4144f6d906999b3064
record_format ojs
spelling Servicios ecosistémicos culturales y métodos de valoración: una revisión sistemática
Kobryn, H. T., Brown, G., Munro, J., & Moore, S. A. (2018). Cultural ecosystem values of the Kim¬berley coastline: An empirical analysis with implications for coastal and marine policy. Ocean & Coastal Management, 162, 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.09.002
Milcu, A. I., Hanspach, J., Abson, D., & Fischer, J. (2013). Cultural ecosystem services: A litera¬ture review and prospects for future research. Ecology and Society, 18(3). https://www.jstor.org/ stable/26269377
McCall, M. K. (2003). Seeking good governance in participatory-gis: A review of processes and governance dimensions in applying gis to participatory spatial planning. Habitat International, 27(4), 549-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00005-5
Martínez, G., Peri, P. L., Lencinas, M. V., García-Llorente, M., & Martín-López, B. (2016). Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia. Landscape Ecology, 31(2), 383-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0254-9
Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., García del Amo, D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Oteros-Rozas, E., Palacios-Agundez, I., Willaarts, B., Gonzá¬lez, J. A., Santos-Martín, F., Onaindia, M., López-Santiago, C., & Montes, C. (2012). Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLOS ONE, 7(6), e38970. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0038970
Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2009). Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(2), 1050-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.03.013
Martín-López, B., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., & Montes, C. (2011). The conservation aga¬inst development paradigm in protected areas: Valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social–ecological system (Southwestern Spain). Ecological Economics, 70(8), 1481-1491. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.009
Lichtenstein, S. & Slovic, P. (Eds.). (2006). The construction of preference. Cambridge University Press.
La Rosa, D., Spyra, M., & Inostroza, L. (2016). Indicators of cultural ecosystem services for urban planning: A review. Ecological Indicators, 61(P1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.028
Kumar, M. & Kumar, P. (2008). Valuation of the ecosystem services: A psycho-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 808-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.008
Kosanic, A. & Petzold, J. (2020). A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing. Ecosystem Services, 45, 101168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101168
Kopperoinen, L., Itkonen, P., & Niemelä, J. (2014). Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: An insight into a new place-based methodology. Landscape Ecology, 29(8), 1361-1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0014-2
Kenter, J. O. (2016). Integrating deliberative monetary valuation, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 21(Part B), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.010
Nabout, J. C., Parreira, M. R., Teresa, F. B., Carneiro, F. M., Da Cunha, H. F., Ondei, L., Cara¬mori, S., & Soares, T. N. (2015). Publish (in a group) or perish (alone): The trend from single- to multi-authorship in biological papers. Scientometrics, 102(1), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-014-1385-5
Keeney, R. L. & McDaniels, T. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking about strategic decisions at BCHydro. Interfaces, 22(6), 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.22.6.94
Hernández-Morcillo, M., Plieninger, T., & Bieling, C. (2013). An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators. Ecological Indicators, 29, 434-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eco¬lind.2013.01.013
Hattam, C., Böhnke-Henrichs, A., Börger, T., Burdon, D., Hadjimichael, M., Delaney, A., Atkins. J. P., Garrard, S., & Austen, M. C. (2015). Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment and valuation: Mixed methods or mixed messages? Ecological Economics, 120, 126-138. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.011
Hartter, J. (2010). Resource use and ecosystem services in a forest park landscape. Society & Natural Resources, 23(3), 207-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920903360372
Hansen-Møller, J. (2009). Natursyns model: A conceptual framework and method for analysing and comparing views of nature. Landscape and Urban Planning, 89(3-4), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. landurbplan.2008.10.007
Haines-Young, R. (2011). Exploring ecosystem service issues across diverse knowledge domains using Bayesian Belief Networks. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 35(5), 681-699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311422977
Gould, R. K., Morse, J. W., & Adams, A. B. (2019). Cultural ecosystem services and decision-making: How researchers describe the applications of their work. People and Nature, 1(4), 457-475. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10044
Gee, K. & Burkhard, B. (2010). Cultural ecosystem services in the context of offshore wind farming: A case study from the west coast of Schleswig-Holstein. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 349-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.02.008
Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECYT). (27 de noviembre de 2020). España aumenta su presencia en la producción científica mundial de excelencia. https://www.fecyt.es/es/ noticia/espana-aumenta-su-presencia-en-la-produccion-cientifica-mundial-de-excelencia
Feld, C. K., Da Silva, P., Sousa, J. P., De Bello, F., Bugter, R., Grandin, U., Hering, D., Lavorel, S., Mountford, O., Pardo, I., Pärtel, M., Römbke, J., Sandin, L., Jones, K. B., & Harrison, P. (2009). Indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem services: A synthesis across ecosystems and spatial scales. Oikos, 118(12), 1862-1871. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17860.x
Farber, S. C., Costanza, R., & Wilson, M. A. (2002). Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 375-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921- 8009(02)00088-5
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water. Synthesis. World Resources Institute. https://acortar.link/AR7ySe
Nahuelhual, L., Carmona, A., Laterra, P., Barrena, J., & Aguayo, M. (2014). A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: The case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile. Ecological Indicators, 40, 90-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.01.005
De Oliveira, S. (2019). A língua da ciência. Pesquisa FAPESP, (282) (En línea). https://acortar.link/MVhkjw Étienne, M. (Ed.). (2013). Companion modelling: A participatory approach to support sustainable development. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8557-0
Sidone, O. J. G., Haddad, E. A., & Mena-Chalco, J. P. (2017). Scholarly publication and collaboration in Brazil: The role of geography. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(1), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23635
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Wilson, M. A. & Howarth, R. B. (2002). Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: Esta¬blishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 431-443. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00092-7
Tengberg, A., Fredholm, S., Eliasson, I., Knez, I., Saltzman, K., & Wetterberg, O. (2012). Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: Assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosystem Services, 2, 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006
Suckall, N., Fraser, E. D., Cooper, T., & Quinn, C. (2009). Visitor perceptions of rural landscapes: A case study in the Peak District National Park, England. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(2), 1195-1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.06.003
Spash, C. L. (2007). Deliberative monetary valuation (dmv): Issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change. Ecological Economics, 63(4), 690-699. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.014
Sherrouse, B. C., Semmens, D. J., & Clement, J. M. (2014). An application of Social Values for Ecosystem Services (Solves) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecological Indi¬cators, 36, 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.008
Norton, L. R., Inwood, H., Crowe, A., & Baker, A. (2012). Trialling a method to quantify the ‘cul¬tural services’ of the English landscape using Countryside Survey data. Land Use Policy, 29(2), 449-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.002
Scholte, S. S., Teeffelen, A. J. van, & Verburg, P. H. (2015). Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: A review of concepts and methods. Ecological Economics, 114, 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007
Schaich, H., Bieling, C., & Plieninger, T. (2010). Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research. Gaia-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 19(4), 269-277. https://doi. org/10.14512/gaia.19.4.9
Satterfield, T., Gregory, R., Klain, S., Roberts, M., & Chan, K. M. (2013). Culture, intangibles and metrics in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 117, 103-114. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.033
Satterfield, T. (2001). In search of value literacy: Suggestions for the elicitation of environmental values. Environmental Values, 10(3), 331-359. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327101129340868
Sander, H. A. & Haight, R. G. (2012). Estimating the economic value of cultural ecosystem services in an urbanizing area using hedonic pricing. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 194-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.031
Russell, R., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Gould, R. K., Basurto, X., Chan, K. M., Klain, S., Levine, J., & Tam, J. (2013). Humans and nature: How knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38, 473-502. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012312-110838
Ribeiro, R. A., Oliveira, L., & Furtado, C. (2019). O inglês como língua franca da ciência. Anais do CBBD, 28. https://acortar.link/Fvcxdw
Reid, W. V., Mooney, H. A., Cropper, A., Capistrano, D., Carpenter, S. R., Chopra, K., Dasgupta, P., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Hassan, R., Kasperson, R., Leemans, R., May, R. M., McMichael, A. J., Pingali, P., Samper, C., Scholes, R., Watson, R. T., Zakri, A. H., … Zurek, M. B. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being-synthesis: A report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/340442
Plieninger, T., Dijks, S., Oteros-Rozas, E., & Bieling, C. (2013). Assessing, mapping, and quanti¬fying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 33, 118-129. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013
Pike, K., Wright, P., Wink, B., & Fletcher, S. (2015). The assessment of cultural ecosystem services in the marine environment using Q methodology. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 19(5), 667-675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-014-0350-z
Parreira, M. R., Machado, K. B., Logares, R., Diniz-Filho, J. A., Nabout, J. C. (2017). The roles of geographic distance and socioeconomic factors on international collaboration among ecologists. Scientometrics, 113, 1539-1550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2502-z
Oleson, K. L., Barnes, M., Brander, L. M., Oliver, T. A., Beek, I. van, Zafindrasilivonona, B., & Beukering, P. van. (2015). Cultural bequest values for ecosystem service flows among indigenous fishers: A discrete choice experiment validated with mixed methods. Ecological Economics, 114, 104-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.028
Fagerholm, N., Käyhkö, N., Ndumbaro, F., & Khamis, M. (2012). Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments–Mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecological Indicators, 18, 421-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.004
Daniel, T. C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J. W., Chan, K. M. A., Costanza, R., Elmqvist, T., Flint, C. G., Gobster, P. H., Grêt-Regamey, A., Lave, R., Muhar, S., Penker, M., Ribe, R. G., Schauppenlehner, T., Sikor, T., Soloviy, I., Spierenburg, M., … Dunk, A. von der. (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(23), 8812-8819. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114773109
Publication
Turismo y Sociedad
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Español
Matos Márquez, Laura Andreína
Bardella Castro, Joana D’Arc
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/tursoc/article/view/9192
Daily, G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, T. H., Salzman, J., & Shallenberger, R. (2009). Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1890/080025
Emilly Layne Martins
Facultad de Administración de Empresas Turísticas y Hoteleras
beneficios intangibles,
application/pdf
Artículo de revista
, Año 2024 : Enero-Junio
34
complejidad operativa
subjetividad,
ecosistemas,
Laura Andreína Matos Márquez, Joana D’Arc Bardella Castro, Emilly Layne Martins - 2023
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los servicios ecosistémicos culturales (SEC) están asociados a la valoración humana no material de lugares y ecosistemas. En este artículo se realiza una revisión siste­mática acerca de las investigaciones que abordan como tema los SEC y métodos de valoración. Las informaciones se obtuvie­ron de las bases de datos Web of Science y Scopus con los siguientes términos de búsqueda: “cultural ecosystem services” y «“cultural ecosystem services” and “valuation methods”». La investigación fue realizada en títulos, resúmenes y palabras clave de artículos científicos. Se utilizaron las recomendaciones metodológicas de la Declaración PRISMA y se aplicaron criterios de exclusion; en total, 954 artículos fueron incluidos para esta revisión. Finalmente, se evidenció que ninguna de las metodologías presentadas es de aplicación absoluta, ya que dependen de que criterios cuantitativos o cualitativos, o bien preferencias declara­das o reveladas de las personas, den como resultado valoraciones monetarias o no monetarias, o bien involucren a las partes interesadas en el proceso de valoración.
Casado-Arzuaga, I., Madariaga, I., & Onaindia, M. (2013). Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt. Journal of Environmental Management, 129, 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.059
Daily, G. C. & Matson, P. A. (2008). Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(28), 9455-9456. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804960105
Costanza, R., Farber, S. C., & Maxwell, J. (1989). Valuation and management of wetland ecosystems. Ecological Economics, 1(4), 335-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(89)90014-1
Cooper, N., Brady, E., Steen, H., & Bryce, R. (2016). Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems: Recognising the ontological and axiological plurality of cultural ecosystem ‘services’. Ecosystem Services, 21(Part B), 218-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.014
Cheng, X., Van Damme, S., Li, L., & Uyttenhove, P. (2019). Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods. Ecosystem Services, 37, 100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925
Chan, K. M. A., Satterfield, T., & Goldstein, J. (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2011.11.011
Chan, K. M. A., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R., Halpern, B. S., Hannahs, N., Levine, J., Norton, B., Ruckelshaus, M., Russell, R., Tam, J., & Woodside, U. (2012). Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience, 62(8), 744-756. https://doi.org/10.1525/ bio.2012.62.8.7
Chan, K. M. A., Goldstein, J., Satterfield, T., Hannahs, N., Kikiloi, K., Naidoo, R., Vadeboncoeur, N., & Woodside, U. (2011). Cultural services and non-use values. En P. Kareiva, H. Tallis, T. H. Ric¬ketts, G. C. Daily, & S. Polasky (Eds.), Natural capital: Theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services (pp. 206-228). Oxford University Press.
Castro, A. J., Martín-López, B., García-Llorente, M., Aguilera, P. A., López, E., & Cabello, J. (2011). Social preferences regarding the delivery of ecosystem services in a semiarid Mediterranean region. Journal of Arid Environments, 75(11), 1201-1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.05.013
Carson, R. T. & Hanemann, W. M. (2005). Contingent valuation. Handbook of Environmental Economics, 2, 821-936. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0099(05)02017-6
Calvet-Mir, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Reyes-García, V. (2012). Beyond food production: Ecosys¬tem services provided by home gardens. A case study in Vall Fosca, Catalan Pyrenees, Northeastern Spain. Ecological Economics, 74, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.011
Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., & Müller, F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
Blythe, J., Armitage, D., Alonso, G., Campbell, D., Dias, A. C., Epstein, G., Marschke, M. & Nayak, P. (2020). Frontiers in coastal well-being and ecosystem services research: A systematic review. Ocean & Coastal Management, 185, 105028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105028
Barrena, J., Nahuelhual, L., Báez, A., Schiappacasse, I., & Cerda, C. (2014). Valuing cultural ecosystem services: Agricultural heritage in Chiloé Island, Southern Chile. Ecosystem Services, 7, 66-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.005
Alexander, A., List, J., Margolis, M., & D’Arge, R. (1998). A method for valuing global ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 27(2), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00173-0
Ahtiainen, H., Liski, E., Pouta, E., Soini, K., Bertram, C., Rehdanz, K., Pakalniete, K., & Meyer¬hof, J. (2019). Cultural ecosystem services provided by the Baltic Sea marine environment. Ambio, 48(11), 1350-1361. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-019-01239-1
Agbenyega, O., Burgess, P. J., Cook, M., & Morris, J. (2009). Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands. Land Use Policy, 26(3), 551-557. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.08.011
Adamowicz, W., Beckley, T., Macdonald, D. H., Just, L., Luckert, M., Murray, E., & Phillips, W. (1998). In search of forest resource values of indigenous peoples: Are nonmarket valuation techniques applicable? Society & Natural Resources, 11(1), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929809381061
servicios no materiales,
Cultural ecosystem services are associated with the non-material human valuation of places and ecosystems. In this article, a systematic review is carried out on the research that deals with ESAs and valua­tion methods as a topic. The information was obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, with the following search terms “cultural ecosystem services” and «“cultural ecosystem services” and “valuation methods”». The research was carried out on titles, abstracts, and keywords of scientific articles. The methodological recommendations of the PRISMA statement were used and exclusion criteria were applied; totally, 954 articles were included for this review. Finally, it was evidenced that none of the methodologies presented is of absolute application, since they depend on criteria: quantitative or qualitative, declared or revealed preferences of people, result in monetary or non-monetary valuations, or involve the parties interested in the appraisal process.
intangible benefits,
non-material services,
ecosystems,
subjectivity,
Cultural Ecosystem Services and Valuation Methods: A Systematic Review
operational complexity
Journal article
2023-12-12T12:02:48Z
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/tursoc/article/download/9192/15276
2023-12-12T12:02:48Z
2023-12-12
0120-7555
10.18601/01207555.n34.04
https://doi.org/10.18601/01207555.n34.04
111
126
2346-206X
institution UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Turismo y Sociedad
title Servicios ecosistémicos culturales y métodos de valoración: una revisión sistemática
spellingShingle Servicios ecosistémicos culturales y métodos de valoración: una revisión sistemática
Matos Márquez, Laura Andreína
Bardella Castro, Joana D’Arc
Emilly Layne Martins
beneficios intangibles,
complejidad operativa
subjetividad,
ecosistemas,
servicios no materiales,
intangible benefits,
non-material services,
ecosystems,
subjectivity,
operational complexity
title_short Servicios ecosistémicos culturales y métodos de valoración: una revisión sistemática
title_full Servicios ecosistémicos culturales y métodos de valoración: una revisión sistemática
title_fullStr Servicios ecosistémicos culturales y métodos de valoración: una revisión sistemática
title_full_unstemmed Servicios ecosistémicos culturales y métodos de valoración: una revisión sistemática
title_sort servicios ecosistémicos culturales y métodos de valoración: una revisión sistemática
title_eng Cultural Ecosystem Services and Valuation Methods: A Systematic Review
description Los servicios ecosistémicos culturales (SEC) están asociados a la valoración humana no material de lugares y ecosistemas. En este artículo se realiza una revisión siste­mática acerca de las investigaciones que abordan como tema los SEC y métodos de valoración. Las informaciones se obtuvie­ron de las bases de datos Web of Science y Scopus con los siguientes términos de búsqueda: “cultural ecosystem services” y «“cultural ecosystem services” and “valuation methods”». La investigación fue realizada en títulos, resúmenes y palabras clave de artículos científicos. Se utilizaron las recomendaciones metodológicas de la Declaración PRISMA y se aplicaron criterios de exclusion; en total, 954 artículos fueron incluidos para esta revisión. Finalmente, se evidenció que ninguna de las metodologías presentadas es de aplicación absoluta, ya que dependen de que criterios cuantitativos o cualitativos, o bien preferencias declara­das o reveladas de las personas, den como resultado valoraciones monetarias o no monetarias, o bien involucren a las partes interesadas en el proceso de valoración.
description_eng Cultural ecosystem services are associated with the non-material human valuation of places and ecosystems. In this article, a systematic review is carried out on the research that deals with ESAs and valua­tion methods as a topic. The information was obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, with the following search terms “cultural ecosystem services” and «“cultural ecosystem services” and “valuation methods”». The research was carried out on titles, abstracts, and keywords of scientific articles. The methodological recommendations of the PRISMA statement were used and exclusion criteria were applied; totally, 954 articles were included for this review. Finally, it was evidenced that none of the methodologies presented is of absolute application, since they depend on criteria: quantitative or qualitative, declared or revealed preferences of people, result in monetary or non-monetary valuations, or involve the parties interested in the appraisal process.
author Matos Márquez, Laura Andreína
Bardella Castro, Joana D’Arc
Emilly Layne Martins
author_facet Matos Márquez, Laura Andreína
Bardella Castro, Joana D’Arc
Emilly Layne Martins
topicspa_str_mv beneficios intangibles,
complejidad operativa
subjetividad,
ecosistemas,
servicios no materiales,
topic beneficios intangibles,
complejidad operativa
subjetividad,
ecosistemas,
servicios no materiales,
intangible benefits,
non-material services,
ecosystems,
subjectivity,
operational complexity
topic_facet beneficios intangibles,
complejidad operativa
subjetividad,
ecosistemas,
servicios no materiales,
intangible benefits,
non-material services,
ecosystems,
subjectivity,
operational complexity
citationvolume 34
citationedition , Año 2024 : Enero-Junio
publisher Facultad de Administración de Empresas Turísticas y Hoteleras
ispartofjournal Turismo y Sociedad
source https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/tursoc/article/view/9192
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Laura Andreína Matos Márquez, Joana D’Arc Bardella Castro, Emilly Layne Martins - 2023
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
references Kobryn, H. T., Brown, G., Munro, J., & Moore, S. A. (2018). Cultural ecosystem values of the Kim¬berley coastline: An empirical analysis with implications for coastal and marine policy. Ocean & Coastal Management, 162, 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.09.002
Milcu, A. I., Hanspach, J., Abson, D., & Fischer, J. (2013). Cultural ecosystem services: A litera¬ture review and prospects for future research. Ecology and Society, 18(3). https://www.jstor.org/ stable/26269377
McCall, M. K. (2003). Seeking good governance in participatory-gis: A review of processes and governance dimensions in applying gis to participatory spatial planning. Habitat International, 27(4), 549-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00005-5
Martínez, G., Peri, P. L., Lencinas, M. V., García-Llorente, M., & Martín-López, B. (2016). Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia. Landscape Ecology, 31(2), 383-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0254-9
Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., García del Amo, D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Oteros-Rozas, E., Palacios-Agundez, I., Willaarts, B., Gonzá¬lez, J. A., Santos-Martín, F., Onaindia, M., López-Santiago, C., & Montes, C. (2012). Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLOS ONE, 7(6), e38970. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0038970
Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2009). Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(2), 1050-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.03.013
Martín-López, B., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., & Montes, C. (2011). The conservation aga¬inst development paradigm in protected areas: Valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social–ecological system (Southwestern Spain). Ecological Economics, 70(8), 1481-1491. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.009
Lichtenstein, S. & Slovic, P. (Eds.). (2006). The construction of preference. Cambridge University Press.
La Rosa, D., Spyra, M., & Inostroza, L. (2016). Indicators of cultural ecosystem services for urban planning: A review. Ecological Indicators, 61(P1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.028
Kumar, M. & Kumar, P. (2008). Valuation of the ecosystem services: A psycho-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 808-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.008
Kosanic, A. & Petzold, J. (2020). A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing. Ecosystem Services, 45, 101168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101168
Kopperoinen, L., Itkonen, P., & Niemelä, J. (2014). Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: An insight into a new place-based methodology. Landscape Ecology, 29(8), 1361-1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0014-2
Kenter, J. O. (2016). Integrating deliberative monetary valuation, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 21(Part B), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.010
Nabout, J. C., Parreira, M. R., Teresa, F. B., Carneiro, F. M., Da Cunha, H. F., Ondei, L., Cara¬mori, S., & Soares, T. N. (2015). Publish (in a group) or perish (alone): The trend from single- to multi-authorship in biological papers. Scientometrics, 102(1), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-014-1385-5
Keeney, R. L. & McDaniels, T. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking about strategic decisions at BCHydro. Interfaces, 22(6), 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.22.6.94
Hernández-Morcillo, M., Plieninger, T., & Bieling, C. (2013). An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators. Ecological Indicators, 29, 434-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eco¬lind.2013.01.013
Hattam, C., Böhnke-Henrichs, A., Börger, T., Burdon, D., Hadjimichael, M., Delaney, A., Atkins. J. P., Garrard, S., & Austen, M. C. (2015). Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment and valuation: Mixed methods or mixed messages? Ecological Economics, 120, 126-138. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.011
Hartter, J. (2010). Resource use and ecosystem services in a forest park landscape. Society & Natural Resources, 23(3), 207-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920903360372
Hansen-Møller, J. (2009). Natursyns model: A conceptual framework and method for analysing and comparing views of nature. Landscape and Urban Planning, 89(3-4), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. landurbplan.2008.10.007
Haines-Young, R. (2011). Exploring ecosystem service issues across diverse knowledge domains using Bayesian Belief Networks. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 35(5), 681-699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311422977
Gould, R. K., Morse, J. W., & Adams, A. B. (2019). Cultural ecosystem services and decision-making: How researchers describe the applications of their work. People and Nature, 1(4), 457-475. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10044
Gee, K. & Burkhard, B. (2010). Cultural ecosystem services in the context of offshore wind farming: A case study from the west coast of Schleswig-Holstein. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 349-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.02.008
Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECYT). (27 de noviembre de 2020). España aumenta su presencia en la producción científica mundial de excelencia. https://www.fecyt.es/es/ noticia/espana-aumenta-su-presencia-en-la-produccion-cientifica-mundial-de-excelencia
Feld, C. K., Da Silva, P., Sousa, J. P., De Bello, F., Bugter, R., Grandin, U., Hering, D., Lavorel, S., Mountford, O., Pardo, I., Pärtel, M., Römbke, J., Sandin, L., Jones, K. B., & Harrison, P. (2009). Indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem services: A synthesis across ecosystems and spatial scales. Oikos, 118(12), 1862-1871. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17860.x
Farber, S. C., Costanza, R., & Wilson, M. A. (2002). Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 375-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921- 8009(02)00088-5
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water. Synthesis. World Resources Institute. https://acortar.link/AR7ySe
Nahuelhual, L., Carmona, A., Laterra, P., Barrena, J., & Aguayo, M. (2014). A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: The case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile. Ecological Indicators, 40, 90-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.01.005
De Oliveira, S. (2019). A língua da ciência. Pesquisa FAPESP, (282) (En línea). https://acortar.link/MVhkjw Étienne, M. (Ed.). (2013). Companion modelling: A participatory approach to support sustainable development. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8557-0
Sidone, O. J. G., Haddad, E. A., & Mena-Chalco, J. P. (2017). Scholarly publication and collaboration in Brazil: The role of geography. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(1), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23635
Wilson, M. A. & Howarth, R. B. (2002). Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: Esta¬blishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 431-443. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00092-7
Tengberg, A., Fredholm, S., Eliasson, I., Knez, I., Saltzman, K., & Wetterberg, O. (2012). Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: Assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosystem Services, 2, 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006
Suckall, N., Fraser, E. D., Cooper, T., & Quinn, C. (2009). Visitor perceptions of rural landscapes: A case study in the Peak District National Park, England. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(2), 1195-1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.06.003
Spash, C. L. (2007). Deliberative monetary valuation (dmv): Issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change. Ecological Economics, 63(4), 690-699. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.014
Sherrouse, B. C., Semmens, D. J., & Clement, J. M. (2014). An application of Social Values for Ecosystem Services (Solves) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecological Indi¬cators, 36, 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.008
Norton, L. R., Inwood, H., Crowe, A., & Baker, A. (2012). Trialling a method to quantify the ‘cul¬tural services’ of the English landscape using Countryside Survey data. Land Use Policy, 29(2), 449-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.002
Scholte, S. S., Teeffelen, A. J. van, & Verburg, P. H. (2015). Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: A review of concepts and methods. Ecological Economics, 114, 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007
Schaich, H., Bieling, C., & Plieninger, T. (2010). Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research. Gaia-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 19(4), 269-277. https://doi. org/10.14512/gaia.19.4.9
Satterfield, T., Gregory, R., Klain, S., Roberts, M., & Chan, K. M. (2013). Culture, intangibles and metrics in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 117, 103-114. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.033
Satterfield, T. (2001). In search of value literacy: Suggestions for the elicitation of environmental values. Environmental Values, 10(3), 331-359. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327101129340868
Sander, H. A. & Haight, R. G. (2012). Estimating the economic value of cultural ecosystem services in an urbanizing area using hedonic pricing. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 194-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.031
Russell, R., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Gould, R. K., Basurto, X., Chan, K. M., Klain, S., Levine, J., & Tam, J. (2013). Humans and nature: How knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38, 473-502. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012312-110838
Ribeiro, R. A., Oliveira, L., & Furtado, C. (2019). O inglês como língua franca da ciência. Anais do CBBD, 28. https://acortar.link/Fvcxdw
Reid, W. V., Mooney, H. A., Cropper, A., Capistrano, D., Carpenter, S. R., Chopra, K., Dasgupta, P., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Hassan, R., Kasperson, R., Leemans, R., May, R. M., McMichael, A. J., Pingali, P., Samper, C., Scholes, R., Watson, R. T., Zakri, A. H., … Zurek, M. B. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being-synthesis: A report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/340442
Plieninger, T., Dijks, S., Oteros-Rozas, E., & Bieling, C. (2013). Assessing, mapping, and quanti¬fying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 33, 118-129. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013
Pike, K., Wright, P., Wink, B., & Fletcher, S. (2015). The assessment of cultural ecosystem services in the marine environment using Q methodology. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 19(5), 667-675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-014-0350-z
Parreira, M. R., Machado, K. B., Logares, R., Diniz-Filho, J. A., Nabout, J. C. (2017). The roles of geographic distance and socioeconomic factors on international collaboration among ecologists. Scientometrics, 113, 1539-1550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2502-z
Oleson, K. L., Barnes, M., Brander, L. M., Oliver, T. A., Beek, I. van, Zafindrasilivonona, B., & Beukering, P. van. (2015). Cultural bequest values for ecosystem service flows among indigenous fishers: A discrete choice experiment validated with mixed methods. Ecological Economics, 114, 104-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.028
Fagerholm, N., Käyhkö, N., Ndumbaro, F., & Khamis, M. (2012). Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments–Mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecological Indicators, 18, 421-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.004
Daniel, T. C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J. W., Chan, K. M. A., Costanza, R., Elmqvist, T., Flint, C. G., Gobster, P. H., Grêt-Regamey, A., Lave, R., Muhar, S., Penker, M., Ribe, R. G., Schauppenlehner, T., Sikor, T., Soloviy, I., Spierenburg, M., … Dunk, A. von der. (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(23), 8812-8819. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114773109
Daily, G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, T. H., Salzman, J., & Shallenberger, R. (2009). Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1890/080025
Casado-Arzuaga, I., Madariaga, I., & Onaindia, M. (2013). Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt. Journal of Environmental Management, 129, 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.059
Daily, G. C. & Matson, P. A. (2008). Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(28), 9455-9456. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804960105
Costanza, R., Farber, S. C., & Maxwell, J. (1989). Valuation and management of wetland ecosystems. Ecological Economics, 1(4), 335-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(89)90014-1
Cooper, N., Brady, E., Steen, H., & Bryce, R. (2016). Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems: Recognising the ontological and axiological plurality of cultural ecosystem ‘services’. Ecosystem Services, 21(Part B), 218-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.014
Cheng, X., Van Damme, S., Li, L., & Uyttenhove, P. (2019). Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods. Ecosystem Services, 37, 100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925
Chan, K. M. A., Satterfield, T., & Goldstein, J. (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2011.11.011
Chan, K. M. A., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R., Halpern, B. S., Hannahs, N., Levine, J., Norton, B., Ruckelshaus, M., Russell, R., Tam, J., & Woodside, U. (2012). Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience, 62(8), 744-756. https://doi.org/10.1525/ bio.2012.62.8.7
Chan, K. M. A., Goldstein, J., Satterfield, T., Hannahs, N., Kikiloi, K., Naidoo, R., Vadeboncoeur, N., & Woodside, U. (2011). Cultural services and non-use values. En P. Kareiva, H. Tallis, T. H. Ric¬ketts, G. C. Daily, & S. Polasky (Eds.), Natural capital: Theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services (pp. 206-228). Oxford University Press.
Castro, A. J., Martín-López, B., García-Llorente, M., Aguilera, P. A., López, E., & Cabello, J. (2011). Social preferences regarding the delivery of ecosystem services in a semiarid Mediterranean region. Journal of Arid Environments, 75(11), 1201-1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.05.013
Carson, R. T. & Hanemann, W. M. (2005). Contingent valuation. Handbook of Environmental Economics, 2, 821-936. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0099(05)02017-6
Calvet-Mir, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Reyes-García, V. (2012). Beyond food production: Ecosys¬tem services provided by home gardens. A case study in Vall Fosca, Catalan Pyrenees, Northeastern Spain. Ecological Economics, 74, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.011
Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., & Müller, F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
Blythe, J., Armitage, D., Alonso, G., Campbell, D., Dias, A. C., Epstein, G., Marschke, M. & Nayak, P. (2020). Frontiers in coastal well-being and ecosystem services research: A systematic review. Ocean & Coastal Management, 185, 105028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105028
Barrena, J., Nahuelhual, L., Báez, A., Schiappacasse, I., & Cerda, C. (2014). Valuing cultural ecosystem services: Agricultural heritage in Chiloé Island, Southern Chile. Ecosystem Services, 7, 66-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.005
Alexander, A., List, J., Margolis, M., & D’Arge, R. (1998). A method for valuing global ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 27(2), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00173-0
Ahtiainen, H., Liski, E., Pouta, E., Soini, K., Bertram, C., Rehdanz, K., Pakalniete, K., & Meyer¬hof, J. (2019). Cultural ecosystem services provided by the Baltic Sea marine environment. Ambio, 48(11), 1350-1361. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-019-01239-1
Agbenyega, O., Burgess, P. J., Cook, M., & Morris, J. (2009). Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands. Land Use Policy, 26(3), 551-557. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.08.011
Adamowicz, W., Beckley, T., Macdonald, D. H., Just, L., Luckert, M., Murray, E., & Phillips, W. (1998). In search of forest resource values of indigenous peoples: Are nonmarket valuation techniques applicable? Society & Natural Resources, 11(1), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929809381061
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2023-12-12
date_accessioned 2023-12-12T12:02:48Z
date_available 2023-12-12T12:02:48Z
url https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/tursoc/article/view/9192
url_doi https://doi.org/10.18601/01207555.n34.04
issn 0120-7555
eissn 2346-206X
doi 10.18601/01207555.n34.04
citationstartpage 111
citationendpage 126
url2_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/tursoc/article/download/9192/15276
_version_ 1797158083674243072

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares