Tradición y revolución: Aproximación a la cultura de la reforma constitucional en Estados Unidos
La idea moderna de Constitución se relaciona con tendencias culturales específicas de tradición y revolución. En ese sentido, dentro del estudio del derecho constitucional comparado las referencias al sistema institucional de Estados Unidos son constantes, dados sus aportes al constitucionalismo contemporáneo y a la noción de Constitución escrita moderna. La reforma constitucional, por tanto, surge como objeto de interés. Sin embargo, cabe anotar que siendo un sistema constitucional jurisprudencial –es decir, en donde las interpretaciones de los tribunales acerca de la Constitución pesan sobre el texto de la misma–, habrá entonces que estudiar las decisiones de la Corte Suprema relativas a la reforma constitucional. Y el alto tribunal se ha... Ver más
Guardado en:
1794-2918
2590-8928
11
2014-01-01
237
261
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Revista Jurídicas - 2014
| id |
42540c5119bbec65a07bc5a585735792 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
Tradición y revolución: Aproximación a la cultura de la reforma constitucional en Estados Unidos Pérez Royo, J. (1987). La Reforma de la Constitución. Madrid: Congreso de los Diputados. Tushnet, M. (1999). Taking the Constitution away from the Courts. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ________. (2008). The Invisible Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press. Tribe, L. (1983). “A Constitution we are Amending: In defense of a restrained Judicial Role”. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 97. Harvard University. ________. (2006). “Introduction”. En: Tarr, A. y Williams, R. (eds.). State Constitutions for the twenty-first Century. Albany: State University of New York Press. Tarr, A. (1998). Understanding State Constitutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Strauss, D. (2010). The Living Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Smith, J. (1995). The Republic of Letters: The Correspondence between Thomas Jefferson and James Madison 1776-1826. New York: Northon and Company. Row, D. (1990-1991). “When Words mean what they we believe that say: the case of Article V”. Iowa Law Review. Vol. 76. University of Iowa. Ramírez Cleves, G. (2003). Los Límites a la Reforma Constitucional y las Garantías-Límites del Poder Constituyente. Bogotá: Universidad Externado. ________. (2007). Constitutional Democracy: Creating and Maintaining a Just Political Order. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Van Alstyne, W. (1987). “The Idea of Constitution as Hard Law”. Journal of Legal Education. Vol. 37. Southwestern Law School. ________. (1989). The Nature of the American Constitution. Urbana-Champaign: Department of Political Science-University of Illinois. Murphy, W. (1978). “The Art of Constitutional Interpretation”. En: Harmon, J. (ed.). Essays on the Constitution of the United States. Port Washington: National University Publications. Mazzone, J. (2004-2005). “Unamendments”. Iowa Law Review. Vol. 90. University of Iowa. Lutz, D. (1996). “Patterns in the Amending of American State Constitutions”. En: Tarr, A. (ed.). Constitutional Politics in the States. Westport: Greenwood Press. Llewellyn, K. (1934). “The Constitution as an Institution”. Columbia Law Review. No. 1, Vol. 34. Columbia University. Levinson, S. (2012). Framed: America’s Fifty One Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance. New York: Oxford University Press. ________. (2000). “Arranging for Amendment: Unintended Outcomes of Constitutional Design”. En: Kyvig, D. (ed.). Unintended Outcomes of Constitutional Amendment. Athens: University of Georgia Press. Kyvig, D. (1996). Explicit and Authentic Acts: Amending the U.S. Constitution, 1776-1995. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. Komesar, N. (1986-1987). “Back to the Future: An Institutional view of making and interpreting Constitutions. Northwestern University Law Review. Vol. 81. Northwestern University. ________. (2009). The Constitution of the United States of America: A contextual analysis. Portland: Hart Publishing. Vile, J. (2013). “Constitutional Revision in the United States of America”. En: Contiades, X. (ed.). Engineering Constitutional Change: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Routledge. Jiménez Asencio, R. (2005). El Constitucionalismo. Madrid: Marcial Pons. United States v. Sprague 282 U.S. 716 (1931). Text http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/article Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958). Coleman v. Miller 307 U.S. 433 (1939). Dillon v. Gloss 256 U.S. 368 (1921). Vorlander, H. (2012). “What is a Constitutional Culture?”. En: Hensel, S. y Bock, U. (eds.). Constitutional Cultures: On the Concept and Representation of Constitutions in the Atlantic World. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Hawke v. Smith, 253 U.S. 221 (1920). Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803). Jurisprudencia Federal Bess v. Ulmer, 985 P.2d 979 (1999). Amador v. State Board of Equalization, 583 P.2d 1281 (1978). Adams v. Gunter, 238 So.2d 824 (1970). McCullers v. Williamson, 144 S.E.2d 911 (1965). Livermore v. Waite, 36 P. 424 (1894). Jurisprudencia Estatal Kay, R. (1998). “American Constitutionalism”. En: Alexander, L. (ed.). Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hughes, C. (1908). Addresses and Papers of Charles Evans Hughes, Governor of New York 1906-1908. New York: Putman’s Sons. Hernández Valle, R. (1993). “El Poder Constituyente Derivado y los Límites Jurídicos al Poder de Reforma Constitucional”. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional. No. 37. 1 Español https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/4853 Universidad de Caldas application/pdf Artículo de revista Núm. 1 , Año 2014 : Enero - Junio 11 Revista Jurídicas - 2014 control judicial Estados Unidos reforma constitucional cultura constitucional González Quintero, Rodrigo La idea moderna de Constitución se relaciona con tendencias culturales específicas de tradición y revolución. En ese sentido, dentro del estudio del derecho constitucional comparado las referencias al sistema institucional de Estados Unidos son constantes, dados sus aportes al constitucionalismo contemporáneo y a la noción de Constitución escrita moderna. La reforma constitucional, por tanto, surge como objeto de interés. Sin embargo, cabe anotar que siendo un sistema constitucional jurisprudencial –es decir, en donde las interpretaciones de los tribunales acerca de la Constitución pesan sobre el texto de la misma–, habrá entonces que estudiar las decisiones de la Corte Suprema relativas a la reforma constitucional. Y el alto tribunal se ha pronunciado en contadas ocasiones, siempre sosteniendo la validez de las reformas y mostrando deferencia hacia el poder reformador. Pero, dado que el sistema institucional estadounidense consta además de 50 Estados con sus constituciones respectivas, es pertinente también reseñar decisiones judiciales estatales concernientes a reformas constitucionales en dicho nivel; en contraste con pronunciamientos federales, las cortes estatales se han empeñado en un intenso activismo judicial que ha resultado en un control tanto formal como material. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Jurídicas Publication Carbonell, M. (1998). Constitución, Reforma Constitucional y Fuentes del Derecho. México D.F.: UNAM. Hensel, S. (2012). “Constitutional Cultures in the Atlantic World during the Age of Revolutions”. En: Hensel, S. y Bock, U. (eds.). Constitutional Cultures: On the Concept and Representation of Constitutions in the Atlantic World. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. García de Enterría, E. (2006). La Constitución como Norma y el Tribunal Constitucional. Madrid: Thomson-Civitas. Gant, S. (1997-1998). “Judicial Supremacy and Non-judicial Interpretation of the Constitution”. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly. Vol. 24. University of California-Hastings College of Law. Eule, J. (1989-1990). “Judicial Review of Direct Democracy”. Yale Law Journal. Vol. 99. Yale University. Ely, J. (1980). Democracy and Distrust. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Dinan, J. (2012). “State Constitutions and American Political Development”. En: Tarr, A. y Burgess, M. (eds.). Constitutional dynamics in Federal Systems. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. De Vega, P. (1985). La Reforma Constitucional y la problemática del Poder Constituyente. Madrid: Tecnos. Dellinger, W. (1983). “The Legitimacy of Constitutional Change: Rethinking the Amendment Process”. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 97. Harvard University. Denning, B. (1998). “Means to Amend: Theories of Constitutional Change”. Tennessee Law Review. Vol. 65. The University of Tennessee. Ackerman, B. (1991). We the People. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Brennan, W. (1985). “The Constitution of the United States: Contemporary Ratification”. The South Texas Law, Review. Vol. 27. South Texas College of Law. Bickel, A. (1986). The Least Dangerous Branch. New Haven: Yale University Press. Amar, A. (1988). “Philadelphia Revisited: Amending the Constitution outside Article V”. University of Chicago Law Review. Vol. 55. University of Chicago. constitutional reform Journal article The modern idea of Constitution is related to specific cultural trends of tradition and revolution. In this sense, within the study of compared constitutional Law references to the American institutional system are common because its contributions to both, contemporary constitutionalism and the notion of modern written Constitution. The constitutional reform, in consequence, emerges as an object of interest. However, it should be noted that being a law-constitutional system – this is to say where the court interpretations about the Constitution prevail over the constitutional text itself –, then there will be a need to study the Supreme Court decisions regarding constitutional reform. And the High Court has ruled on rare occasions, always upholding the reforms validity and showing deference to the reforming power. But, since the North American institutional system comprises 50 States with their respective constitutions, it is relevant also to review State courtdecisions related to constitutional reforms at that level. In contrast with federal pronouncements, the State courts have insisted on an intense judicial activism, which has resulted in control both formal and material. - judicial review United States constitutional culture Tradition and revolution: An approximation to the culture of constitutional reform in the United States 2590-8928 https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/4853 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z 1794-2918 https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/download/4853/4432 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z 261 2014-01-01 237 |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Jurídicas |
| title |
Tradición y revolución: Aproximación a la cultura de la reforma constitucional en Estados Unidos |
| spellingShingle |
Tradición y revolución: Aproximación a la cultura de la reforma constitucional en Estados Unidos González Quintero, Rodrigo control judicial Estados Unidos reforma constitucional cultura constitucional constitutional reform judicial review United States constitutional culture |
| title_short |
Tradición y revolución: Aproximación a la cultura de la reforma constitucional en Estados Unidos |
| title_full |
Tradición y revolución: Aproximación a la cultura de la reforma constitucional en Estados Unidos |
| title_fullStr |
Tradición y revolución: Aproximación a la cultura de la reforma constitucional en Estados Unidos |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Tradición y revolución: Aproximación a la cultura de la reforma constitucional en Estados Unidos |
| title_sort |
tradición y revolución: aproximación a la cultura de la reforma constitucional en estados unidos |
| title_eng |
Tradition and revolution: An approximation to the culture of constitutional reform in the United States |
| description |
La idea moderna de Constitución se relaciona con tendencias culturales específicas de tradición y revolución. En ese sentido, dentro del estudio del derecho constitucional comparado las referencias al sistema institucional de Estados Unidos son constantes, dados sus aportes al constitucionalismo contemporáneo y a la noción de Constitución escrita moderna. La reforma constitucional, por tanto, surge como objeto de interés. Sin embargo, cabe anotar que siendo un sistema constitucional jurisprudencial –es decir, en donde las interpretaciones de los tribunales acerca de la Constitución pesan sobre el texto de la misma–, habrá entonces que estudiar las decisiones de la Corte Suprema relativas a la reforma constitucional. Y el alto tribunal se ha pronunciado en contadas ocasiones, siempre sosteniendo la validez de las reformas y mostrando deferencia hacia el poder reformador. Pero, dado que el sistema institucional estadounidense consta además de 50 Estados con sus constituciones respectivas, es pertinente también reseñar decisiones judiciales estatales concernientes a reformas constitucionales en dicho nivel; en contraste con pronunciamientos federales, las cortes estatales se han empeñado en un intenso activismo judicial que ha resultado en un control tanto formal como material.
|
| description_eng |
The modern idea of Constitution is related to specific cultural trends of tradition and revolution. In this sense, within the study of compared constitutional Law references to the American institutional system are common because its contributions to both, contemporary constitutionalism and the notion of modern written Constitution. The constitutional reform, in consequence, emerges as an object of interest. However, it should be noted that being a law-constitutional system – this is to say where the court interpretations about the Constitution prevail over the constitutional text itself –, then there will be a need to study the Supreme Court decisions regarding constitutional reform. And the High Court has ruled on rare occasions, always upholding the reforms validity and showing deference to the reforming power. But, since the North American institutional system comprises 50 States with their respective constitutions, it is relevant also to review State courtdecisions related to constitutional reforms at that level. In contrast with federal pronouncements, the State courts have insisted on an intense judicial activism, which has resulted in control both formal and material.
|
| author |
González Quintero, Rodrigo |
| author_facet |
González Quintero, Rodrigo |
| topicspa_str_mv |
control judicial Estados Unidos reforma constitucional cultura constitucional |
| topic |
control judicial Estados Unidos reforma constitucional cultura constitucional constitutional reform judicial review United States constitutional culture |
| topic_facet |
control judicial Estados Unidos reforma constitucional cultura constitucional constitutional reform judicial review United States constitutional culture |
| citationvolume |
11 |
| citationissue |
1 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 1 , Año 2014 : Enero - Junio |
| publisher |
Universidad de Caldas |
| ispartofjournal |
Jurídicas |
| source |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/4853 |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Revista Jurídicas - 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| references |
Pérez Royo, J. (1987). La Reforma de la Constitución. Madrid: Congreso de los Diputados. Tushnet, M. (1999). Taking the Constitution away from the Courts. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ________. (2008). The Invisible Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press. Tribe, L. (1983). “A Constitution we are Amending: In defense of a restrained Judicial Role”. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 97. Harvard University. ________. (2006). “Introduction”. En: Tarr, A. y Williams, R. (eds.). State Constitutions for the twenty-first Century. Albany: State University of New York Press. Tarr, A. (1998). Understanding State Constitutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Strauss, D. (2010). The Living Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Smith, J. (1995). The Republic of Letters: The Correspondence between Thomas Jefferson and James Madison 1776-1826. New York: Northon and Company. Row, D. (1990-1991). “When Words mean what they we believe that say: the case of Article V”. Iowa Law Review. Vol. 76. University of Iowa. Ramírez Cleves, G. (2003). Los Límites a la Reforma Constitucional y las Garantías-Límites del Poder Constituyente. Bogotá: Universidad Externado. ________. (2007). Constitutional Democracy: Creating and Maintaining a Just Political Order. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Van Alstyne, W. (1987). “The Idea of Constitution as Hard Law”. Journal of Legal Education. Vol. 37. Southwestern Law School. ________. (1989). The Nature of the American Constitution. Urbana-Champaign: Department of Political Science-University of Illinois. Murphy, W. (1978). “The Art of Constitutional Interpretation”. En: Harmon, J. (ed.). Essays on the Constitution of the United States. Port Washington: National University Publications. Mazzone, J. (2004-2005). “Unamendments”. Iowa Law Review. Vol. 90. University of Iowa. Lutz, D. (1996). “Patterns in the Amending of American State Constitutions”. En: Tarr, A. (ed.). Constitutional Politics in the States. Westport: Greenwood Press. Llewellyn, K. (1934). “The Constitution as an Institution”. Columbia Law Review. No. 1, Vol. 34. Columbia University. Levinson, S. (2012). Framed: America’s Fifty One Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance. New York: Oxford University Press. ________. (2000). “Arranging for Amendment: Unintended Outcomes of Constitutional Design”. En: Kyvig, D. (ed.). Unintended Outcomes of Constitutional Amendment. Athens: University of Georgia Press. Kyvig, D. (1996). Explicit and Authentic Acts: Amending the U.S. Constitution, 1776-1995. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. Komesar, N. (1986-1987). “Back to the Future: An Institutional view of making and interpreting Constitutions. Northwestern University Law Review. Vol. 81. Northwestern University. ________. (2009). The Constitution of the United States of America: A contextual analysis. Portland: Hart Publishing. Vile, J. (2013). “Constitutional Revision in the United States of America”. En: Contiades, X. (ed.). Engineering Constitutional Change: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Routledge. Jiménez Asencio, R. (2005). El Constitucionalismo. Madrid: Marcial Pons. United States v. Sprague 282 U.S. 716 (1931). Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958). Coleman v. Miller 307 U.S. 433 (1939). Dillon v. Gloss 256 U.S. 368 (1921). Vorlander, H. (2012). “What is a Constitutional Culture?”. En: Hensel, S. y Bock, U. (eds.). Constitutional Cultures: On the Concept and Representation of Constitutions in the Atlantic World. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Hawke v. Smith, 253 U.S. 221 (1920). Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803). Jurisprudencia Federal Bess v. Ulmer, 985 P.2d 979 (1999). Amador v. State Board of Equalization, 583 P.2d 1281 (1978). Adams v. Gunter, 238 So.2d 824 (1970). McCullers v. Williamson, 144 S.E.2d 911 (1965). Livermore v. Waite, 36 P. 424 (1894). Jurisprudencia Estatal Kay, R. (1998). “American Constitutionalism”. En: Alexander, L. (ed.). Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hughes, C. (1908). Addresses and Papers of Charles Evans Hughes, Governor of New York 1906-1908. New York: Putman’s Sons. Hernández Valle, R. (1993). “El Poder Constituyente Derivado y los Límites Jurídicos al Poder de Reforma Constitucional”. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional. No. 37. Carbonell, M. (1998). Constitución, Reforma Constitucional y Fuentes del Derecho. México D.F.: UNAM. Hensel, S. (2012). “Constitutional Cultures in the Atlantic World during the Age of Revolutions”. En: Hensel, S. y Bock, U. (eds.). Constitutional Cultures: On the Concept and Representation of Constitutions in the Atlantic World. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. García de Enterría, E. (2006). La Constitución como Norma y el Tribunal Constitucional. Madrid: Thomson-Civitas. Gant, S. (1997-1998). “Judicial Supremacy and Non-judicial Interpretation of the Constitution”. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly. Vol. 24. University of California-Hastings College of Law. Eule, J. (1989-1990). “Judicial Review of Direct Democracy”. Yale Law Journal. Vol. 99. Yale University. Ely, J. (1980). Democracy and Distrust. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Dinan, J. (2012). “State Constitutions and American Political Development”. En: Tarr, A. y Burgess, M. (eds.). Constitutional dynamics in Federal Systems. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. De Vega, P. (1985). La Reforma Constitucional y la problemática del Poder Constituyente. Madrid: Tecnos. Dellinger, W. (1983). “The Legitimacy of Constitutional Change: Rethinking the Amendment Process”. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 97. Harvard University. Denning, B. (1998). “Means to Amend: Theories of Constitutional Change”. Tennessee Law Review. Vol. 65. The University of Tennessee. Ackerman, B. (1991). We the People. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Brennan, W. (1985). “The Constitution of the United States: Contemporary Ratification”. The South Texas Law, Review. Vol. 27. South Texas College of Law. Bickel, A. (1986). The Least Dangerous Branch. New Haven: Yale University Press. Amar, A. (1988). “Philadelphia Revisited: Amending the Constitution outside Article V”. University of Chicago Law Review. Vol. 55. University of Chicago. |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
| date_accessioned |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/4853 |
| url_doi |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/4853 |
| issn |
1794-2918 |
| eissn |
2590-8928 |
| citationstartpage |
237 |
| citationendpage |
261 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/download/4853/4432 |
| _version_ |
1797158074379665408 |