Class and party : Daniel Bensaïd’s philosophy of strategy against the randomization of politics.
Este artículo defiende la centralidad de la noción de lucha de clases tanto en la teoría política como en la práctica para contrarrestar lo que EM Wood, haciendo eco de P. Anderson (1983), ha denominado la «aleatorización de la política» (1986), a saber: la política reducida a la contingencia pura donde no se permite la causalidad entre lo social y lo político. Sugiere que la lucha de clases es precisamente la causa perdida de la política radical, ya que la lucha de clases funciona como un principio sintético que informa un concepto de la sociedad en su conjunto y una visión del antagonismo como una instancia sistémica y totalista. Sobre la base de la «filosofía de la estrategia» de Daniel Bensaïd y su lectura crítica de la teoría de clases... Ver más
Guardado en:
2389-8232
2539-2239
6
2019-01-01
156
179
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Jamila M.H. Mascat - 2019
| id |
3340e284cf1cbb094f89ff36448cdf3c |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
Class and party : Daniel Bensaïd’s philosophy of strategy against the randomization of politics. Marxismo Soft Power Soft Power Artículo de revista Núm. 1 , Año 2019 :Enero - Junio 6 1 Daniel bensaïd Partido Lucha de clases Mascat, Jamila M.H. Este artículo defiende la centralidad de la noción de lucha de clases tanto en la teoría política como en la práctica para contrarrestar lo que EM Wood, haciendo eco de P. Anderson (1983), ha denominado la «aleatorización de la política» (1986), a saber: la política reducida a la contingencia pura donde no se permite la causalidad entre lo social y lo político. Sugiere que la lucha de clases es precisamente la causa perdida de la política radical, ya que la lucha de clases funciona como un principio sintético que informa un concepto de la sociedad en su conjunto y una visión del antagonismo como una instancia sistémica y totalista. Sobre la base de la «filosofía de la estrategia» de Daniel Bensaïd y su lectura crítica de la teoría de clases de Marx (Bensaïd, 1995; 2002; 2011; 2016), el artículo sugiere que la lucha de clases se reconsidere como un nuevo «universalismo estratégico» a través de la división internacional del trabajo. En la línea de la comprensión de Bensaïd de la política como un «arte estratégico» de reinicio (Bensaïd, 1995), se argumentará aquí que la política radical no puede prescindir de la lucha de clases o del partido. Estrategia Hardt, M. & A. Negri (2004). Multitude. War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. London: Penguin Books. Lenin, V. I. (1987). What is to be done?. In Essential Works of Lenin: “What Is to Be Done?” and Other Writings. New York: Dover Publications. Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso. Laclau, E. & C. Mouffe (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso. Kouvelakis, S. (2010). Daniel Bensaïd : La dialectique du temps et de la lutte. Lignes, 2(32), 59-66. Jameson, F. (1988). Cognitive Mapping. In: C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 347-360). Chicago: University of Illinois Press. Hegel, G.W.F. (2010). The Science of Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cohen, G. A. (1978). Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defence. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Gorz, A. (1982). Farewell to the Working Class. London: Pluto Press. Hall, S. (1986). The Problem of Ideology-Marxism without Guarantees. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10 (2), 28-44. Gorz, A. (1989). Critique of Economic Reason. London: Verso. Goldmann, L. (2016). The Hidden God. Londin: Penguin Random House. Marx, K. (2008) The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: Cosimo. Foley, B. (2018). Intersectionality: A Marxist Critique. Monthly Review online. https://mronline.org/2018/10/22/intersectionality-a-marxist-critique/ Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? London: Zero Books. Fassin, E. et al. (2018). Left-wing Populism. A Legacy of Defeat. Interview with E. Fassin. Radical Philosophy, 2.02, 79-92. Fassin, E. (2018). Populism Left and Right. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press. Elster, J. (1985). Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lowy, M. (2005). Le pari mélancolique de Daniel Bensaïd. Le site Daniel Bensaïd. http://danielbensaid.org/Le-pari-melancolique-de-Daniel-Bensaid?lang=fr Roso, D. & F. Mascaro Querido (2015). Daniel Bensaïd, une politique de l’opprimé. De l’actualité de la revolution au pari mélancholique. Période. http://revueperiode.net/daniel-bensaid-une-politique-de-lopprime-de-lactualite-dela-revolution-au-pari-melancolique/ Mascat, J.M.H. (2018). Hegel and the Advent of Modernity. A Social Ontology of Abstraction. Radical Philosophy, 2.01, 29-46. Wood, E. M. (1986). The Retreat from Class. London: Verso. Text http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/article Tronti, M. (2010). Il populismo. Democrazia e diritto, 3/4, 9-15. Mouffe, C. (1983). Working Class Hegemony and the Struggle for Socialism. Studies in Political Economy, 12, 8-26. Thompson, E. P. (1963). The Making of the English Working Class. New York: Vintage Books. Smith, S. (2017). A Marxist Case for Intersectionality. Socialist Worker. https://socialistworker.org/2017/08/01/a-marxist-case-for-intersectionality Buffet, W. (2005). Buffett: «There are lots of loose nukes around the world» (interview with L. Dobbs). http://edition.cnn.com/2005/US/05/10/buffett/index.html Roemer, J. (Ed.). (1986). Analytical Marxism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Roemer, J. (1982). A General Theory of Exploitation and Class. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Rifkin, J. (1995). The End of Work: The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-Market Era. New York: Putnam Publishing. Poulantzas, N. (1978). Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: Verso. Mouffe, C. 2018. For a Left Populism. London: Verso. Chibber, V. (2017). Rescuing Class from the Cultural Turn, Catalyst, 1(1). https://catalyst-journal.com/vol1/no1/cultural-turn-vivek-chibber Bensaïd, D. (2008a). Eloge de la politique profane. Paris: Albin Michel. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Espace social et genèse des «classes». Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, vol. 52-53 (“Le travail politique”), pp. 3-14. application/pdf Anderson, P. (1983). In the Tracks of Historical Materialism. London: Verso. Boltanski L. & E. Chiapello (2007). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso. Jamila M.H. Mascat - 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Inglés https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3524 Journal article Balibar, E. & I. Wallerstein (1991). Race, Nation and Class. Ambiguous Identities. London: Verso. Marxism Daniel bensaïd Strategy Party Class struggle This article argues for the centrality of the notion of class struggle in both political theory and praxis in order to counter what E. M. Wood, echoing P. Anderson (1983), has referred to as the «randomization of politics» (1986), namely a politics reduced to pure contingency where no causality between the social and the political is allowed. It suggests that class struggle is precisely the lost cause of radical politics, since class struggle operates as a synthetic principle informing a concept of society as a whole and a view of antagonism as a systemic and totalistic instance. Drawing on Daniel Bensaïd’s «philosophy of strategy» and its critical reading of Marx’s class theory (Bensaïd, 1995; 2002; 2011; 2016), the article suggests that class struggle be rethought as a new «strategic universalism» across the international division of labor. Along the lines of Bensaïd’s understanding of politics as a «strategic art» of recommencement (Bensaïd, 1995), it will be argued here that radical politics cannot do without class struggle or without the party Balibar, E. (2016). Des universels. Essais et conférences. Paris: Editions Galilée. Publication Bensaïd, D. (1968). La notion de crise révolutionnaire chez Lénine. Le site Daniel Bensaïd. http://danielbensaid.org/La-notion-de-crise-revolutionnaire-chez-Lenine?lang=fr Bensaïd, D. (1991). Le pari mélancolique. Paris: Fayard. Bensaïd, D., Palheta U. & J. Salingue (2016). Stratégie et Parti. Paris: Les prairies ordinaires. Bensaïd, D. (2011). La politique comme art stratégique. Paris: Syllepses. Bensaïd, D. (2008c). Politiques de Marx. In F. Engels and K. Marx, Inventer l’inconnu. Textes et correspondance autour de la Commune. Paris: La Fabrique, pp. 11-103. Bensaïd, D. (2008b). La preuve par la bourgeoisie. Le site Daniel Bensaïd. http://danielbensaid.org/La-preuve-par-la-bourgeoisie?lang=fr Class and party : Daniel Bensaïd’s philosophy of strategy against the randomization of politics. Bensaïd, D. (2013). An Impatient Life. A Memoir, London: Verso. Bensaïd, D. (2007). Leaps! Leaps! Leaps!. In S. Budgen, S. Kouvelakis and S. Žižek (Eds.) Lenin Reloaded. Toward a Politics of Truth. Durham: Duke University Press, 148-163. Bensaïd, D. (2006). Moment utopique et refondation stratégique. Le site Daniel Bensaïd. http://danielbensaid.org/Moment-utopique-et-refondation-strategique?lang=fr Bensaïd, D. (2002). Marx for Our Times. Adventures and Misadventures of a Critique. London: Verso. Bensaïd, D. (2000). Le Sourire du spectre. Paris: Editions Michalon. Bensaïd, D. (1997). Lénine ou la politique du temps brisé. Le site Daniel Bensaïd. http://danielbensaid.org/Lenine-ou-la-politique-du-temps-brise?lang=fr Bensaïd, D. (1996). Travailler pour l’incertain (Le Monde, 22 August). Le site Daniel Bensaïd. http://danielbensaid.org/Travailler-pour-l-incertain?lang=fr Bensaïd, D. (1995). La discordance des temps. Essais sur les crises, les classes, l’histoire. Paris: Editions de la passion. Bensaïd, D. (1992). Classes : théorie et pratique. Le site Daniel Bensaïd. http://danielbensaid.org/Classes-theorie-et-pratique?lang=fr#nb4 2539-2239 2389-8232 10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.8 2019-01-01 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/3524/3243 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.8 179 156 |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADCATOLICADECOLOMBIA/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Soft Power |
| title |
Class and party : Daniel Bensaïd’s philosophy of strategy against the randomization of politics. |
| spellingShingle |
Class and party : Daniel Bensaïd’s philosophy of strategy against the randomization of politics. Mascat, Jamila M.H. Marxismo Daniel bensaïd Partido Lucha de clases Estrategia Marxism Daniel bensaïd Strategy Party Class struggle |
| title_short |
Class and party : Daniel Bensaïd’s philosophy of strategy against the randomization of politics. |
| title_full |
Class and party : Daniel Bensaïd’s philosophy of strategy against the randomization of politics. |
| title_fullStr |
Class and party : Daniel Bensaïd’s philosophy of strategy against the randomization of politics. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Class and party : Daniel Bensaïd’s philosophy of strategy against the randomization of politics. |
| title_sort |
class and party : daniel bensaïd’s philosophy of strategy against the randomization of politics. |
| title_eng |
Class and party : Daniel Bensaïd’s philosophy of strategy against the randomization of politics. |
| description |
Este artículo defiende la centralidad de la noción de lucha de clases tanto en la teoría política como en la práctica para contrarrestar lo que EM Wood, haciendo eco de P. Anderson (1983), ha denominado la «aleatorización de la política» (1986), a saber: la política reducida a la contingencia pura donde no se permite la causalidad entre lo social y lo político. Sugiere que la lucha de clases es precisamente la causa perdida de la política radical, ya que la lucha de clases funciona como un principio sintético que informa un concepto de la sociedad en su conjunto y una visión del antagonismo como una instancia sistémica y totalista. Sobre la base de la «filosofía de la estrategia» de Daniel Bensaïd y su lectura crítica de la teoría de clases de Marx (Bensaïd, 1995; 2002; 2011; 2016), el artículo sugiere que la lucha de clases se reconsidere como un nuevo «universalismo estratégico» a través de la división internacional del trabajo. En la línea de la comprensión de Bensaïd de la política como un «arte estratégico» de reinicio (Bensaïd, 1995), se argumentará aquí que la política radical no puede prescindir de la lucha de clases o del partido.
|
| description_eng |
This article argues for the centrality of the notion of class struggle in both political theory and praxis in order to counter what E. M. Wood, echoing P. Anderson (1983), has referred to as the «randomization of politics» (1986), namely a politics reduced to pure contingency where no causality between the social and the political is allowed. It suggests that class struggle is precisely the lost cause of radical politics, since class struggle operates as a synthetic principle informing a concept of society as a whole and a view of antagonism as a systemic and totalistic instance. Drawing on Daniel Bensaïd’s «philosophy of strategy» and its critical reading of Marx’s class theory (Bensaïd, 1995; 2002; 2011; 2016), the article suggests that class struggle be rethought as a new «strategic universalism» across the international division of labor. Along the lines of Bensaïd’s understanding of politics as a «strategic art» of recommencement (Bensaïd, 1995), it will be argued here that radical politics cannot do without class struggle or without the party
|
| author |
Mascat, Jamila M.H. |
| author_facet |
Mascat, Jamila M.H. |
| topicspa_str_mv |
Marxismo Daniel bensaïd Partido Lucha de clases Estrategia |
| topic |
Marxismo Daniel bensaïd Partido Lucha de clases Estrategia Marxism Daniel bensaïd Strategy Party Class struggle |
| topic_facet |
Marxismo Daniel bensaïd Partido Lucha de clases Estrategia Marxism Daniel bensaïd Strategy Party Class struggle |
| citationvolume |
6 |
| citationissue |
1 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 1 , Año 2019 :Enero - Junio |
| publisher |
Soft Power |
| ispartofjournal |
Soft Power |
| source |
https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3524 |
| language |
Inglés |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Jamila M.H. Mascat - 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| references_eng |
Hardt, M. & A. Negri (2004). Multitude. War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. London: Penguin Books. Lenin, V. I. (1987). What is to be done?. In Essential Works of Lenin: “What Is to Be Done?” and Other Writings. New York: Dover Publications. Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso. Laclau, E. & C. Mouffe (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso. Kouvelakis, S. (2010). Daniel Bensaïd : La dialectique du temps et de la lutte. Lignes, 2(32), 59-66. Jameson, F. (1988). Cognitive Mapping. In: C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 347-360). Chicago: University of Illinois Press. Hegel, G.W.F. (2010). The Science of Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cohen, G. A. (1978). Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defence. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Gorz, A. (1982). Farewell to the Working Class. London: Pluto Press. Hall, S. (1986). The Problem of Ideology-Marxism without Guarantees. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10 (2), 28-44. Gorz, A. (1989). Critique of Economic Reason. London: Verso. Goldmann, L. (2016). The Hidden God. Londin: Penguin Random House. Marx, K. (2008) The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: Cosimo. Foley, B. (2018). Intersectionality: A Marxist Critique. Monthly Review online. https://mronline.org/2018/10/22/intersectionality-a-marxist-critique/ Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? London: Zero Books. Fassin, E. et al. (2018). Left-wing Populism. A Legacy of Defeat. Interview with E. Fassin. Radical Philosophy, 2.02, 79-92. Fassin, E. (2018). Populism Left and Right. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press. Elster, J. (1985). Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lowy, M. (2005). Le pari mélancolique de Daniel Bensaïd. Le site Daniel Bensaïd. http://danielbensaid.org/Le-pari-melancolique-de-Daniel-Bensaid?lang=fr Roso, D. & F. Mascaro Querido (2015). Daniel Bensaïd, une politique de l’opprimé. De l’actualité de la revolution au pari mélancholique. Période. http://revueperiode.net/daniel-bensaid-une-politique-de-lopprime-de-lactualite-dela-revolution-au-pari-melancolique/ Mascat, J.M.H. (2018). Hegel and the Advent of Modernity. A Social Ontology of Abstraction. Radical Philosophy, 2.01, 29-46. Wood, E. M. (1986). The Retreat from Class. London: Verso. Tronti, M. (2010). Il populismo. Democrazia e diritto, 3/4, 9-15. Mouffe, C. (1983). Working Class Hegemony and the Struggle for Socialism. Studies in Political Economy, 12, 8-26. Thompson, E. P. (1963). The Making of the English Working Class. New York: Vintage Books. Smith, S. (2017). A Marxist Case for Intersectionality. Socialist Worker. https://socialistworker.org/2017/08/01/a-marxist-case-for-intersectionality Buffet, W. (2005). Buffett: «There are lots of loose nukes around the world» (interview with L. Dobbs). http://edition.cnn.com/2005/US/05/10/buffett/index.html Roemer, J. (Ed.). (1986). Analytical Marxism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Roemer, J. (1982). A General Theory of Exploitation and Class. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Rifkin, J. (1995). The End of Work: The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-Market Era. New York: Putnam Publishing. Poulantzas, N. (1978). Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: Verso. Mouffe, C. 2018. For a Left Populism. London: Verso. Chibber, V. (2017). Rescuing Class from the Cultural Turn, Catalyst, 1(1). https://catalyst-journal.com/vol1/no1/cultural-turn-vivek-chibber Bensaïd, D. (2008a). Eloge de la politique profane. Paris: Albin Michel. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Espace social et genèse des «classes». Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, vol. 52-53 (“Le travail politique”), pp. 3-14. Anderson, P. (1983). In the Tracks of Historical Materialism. London: Verso. Boltanski L. & E. Chiapello (2007). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso. Balibar, E. & I. Wallerstein (1991). Race, Nation and Class. Ambiguous Identities. London: Verso. Balibar, E. (2016). Des universels. Essais et conférences. Paris: Editions Galilée. Bensaïd, D. (1968). La notion de crise révolutionnaire chez Lénine. Le site Daniel Bensaïd. http://danielbensaid.org/La-notion-de-crise-revolutionnaire-chez-Lenine?lang=fr Bensaïd, D. (1991). Le pari mélancolique. Paris: Fayard. Bensaïd, D., Palheta U. & J. Salingue (2016). Stratégie et Parti. Paris: Les prairies ordinaires. Bensaïd, D. (2011). La politique comme art stratégique. Paris: Syllepses. Bensaïd, D. (2008c). Politiques de Marx. In F. Engels and K. Marx, Inventer l’inconnu. Textes et correspondance autour de la Commune. Paris: La Fabrique, pp. 11-103. Bensaïd, D. (2008b). La preuve par la bourgeoisie. Le site Daniel Bensaïd. http://danielbensaid.org/La-preuve-par-la-bourgeoisie?lang=fr Bensaïd, D. (2013). An Impatient Life. A Memoir, London: Verso. Bensaïd, D. (2007). Leaps! Leaps! Leaps!. In S. Budgen, S. Kouvelakis and S. Žižek (Eds.) Lenin Reloaded. Toward a Politics of Truth. Durham: Duke University Press, 148-163. Bensaïd, D. (2006). Moment utopique et refondation stratégique. Le site Daniel Bensaïd. http://danielbensaid.org/Moment-utopique-et-refondation-strategique?lang=fr Bensaïd, D. (2002). Marx for Our Times. Adventures and Misadventures of a Critique. London: Verso. Bensaïd, D. (2000). Le Sourire du spectre. Paris: Editions Michalon. Bensaïd, D. (1997). Lénine ou la politique du temps brisé. Le site Daniel Bensaïd. http://danielbensaid.org/Lenine-ou-la-politique-du-temps-brise?lang=fr Bensaïd, D. (1996). Travailler pour l’incertain (Le Monde, 22 August). Le site Daniel Bensaïd. http://danielbensaid.org/Travailler-pour-l-incertain?lang=fr Bensaïd, D. (1995). La discordance des temps. Essais sur les crises, les classes, l’histoire. Paris: Editions de la passion. Bensaïd, D. (1992). Classes : théorie et pratique. Le site Daniel Bensaïd. http://danielbensaid.org/Classes-theorie-et-pratique?lang=fr#nb4 |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
| date_accessioned |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3524 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.8 |
| issn |
2389-8232 |
| eissn |
2539-2239 |
| doi |
10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.8 |
| citationstartpage |
156 |
| citationendpage |
179 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/3524/3243 |
| _version_ |
1797158216696594432 |