Small islands in international relations scholarship: A dialectic centrality
En la erudición de las relaciones internacionales (RI), las islas rara vez se consideran, excepto en contextos específicos, y esos contextos rara vez involucran dimensiones que convencionalmente se consideran importantes. La mayoría de las islas, ya sean soberanas, semiautónomas o completamente no autónomas, están relegadas a los márgenes de la erudición de las RI. Este artículo desafía la validez de esta marginación al presentar y examinar islas autónomas tanto soberanas como no soberanas como actores internacionales. Estos ejemplos ilustran la gran paradoja de las islas, a saber, que a lo largo de la historia estas han funcionado como puntos centrales en lugar de ideas secundarias y, debido a ese papel central, las islas encarnan la sínte... Ver más
1657-7558
2346-2132
2022-12-05
7
24
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Nancy WrightI - 2022
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
id |
30ee04c1f8867bfa48420d528bd70c50 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
Small islands in international relations scholarship: A dialectic centrality Hand, F. (2011). Lindsey Collen: The Courage to Be Parochial. Wasafari, 26, 2. Klieger, P. C. (2011). The Microstates of Europe: Designer Nations in a Post-Modern World. Lexington Books. Ingegritsen, C., Neumann, I., Gstöhl, S., and Beyer, J. (Eds.) (2006). Small States in International Relations. University of Washington. Press and University of Iceland Press. Hey, J. (2003). Small States in World Politics: Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior. Lynne Rienner. Hawkins, P. (2008). Until When Shall We Remain Postcolonial? Globalization, Nationalism, and Cultural Self-Determination in the Literatures of the Indian Ocean. E-France: An On-Line Journal of French Studies, 2, 8-18. Hawkins, P. (2007). The Other Hybrid Archipelago: In¬troduction to the Literatures and Cultures of the Francophone Indian Ocean. Lexington Books. Haring, L. (2007). Stars and Keys: Foktales and Creoliza¬tion in the Indian Ocean, trans. Claudie Ricaud and Dawood Auleear. Indiana University Press. Gonzales, A. P., et al. (2022). Caribbean Citizenshipby- Investment Programmes: Performance and Challenges. Caribbean Investigative Journalism Network. Clermont, FL, May 22, 2022. Lobban, R. A. (2018). Cape Verde: Crioulo Colony to Independent Nation. Routledge. Falola, T., Parrott, R. J. and Porter Sanchez, D. (Eds.) (2019). African Islands: Leading Edges of Empire and Globalization. University of Rochester Press. Eccardt, T. (2005). Secrets of the Seven Smallest States of Europe. Hippocrene Books. Duursma, J. C. (1996). Fragmentation and the International Relations of Micro-states: Self-Determination and Statehood. Cambridge University Press. Corbett, J., Veenendaal, W., and Ugyel, L. (2017). Why Monarchy Persists in Small States: The Cases of Tonga, Bhutan, and Liechtenstein. Democratization 24 (4), 689-706. Corbett, J. and Veendaal, W. (2018). Democracy in Small States: Persisting Against All Odds. Oxford University Press. Briffa, H. (2018). Malta: Bridge of the Mediterranean: Neutrality as a Small State, States Seeking Grand Strategy. Small States and the New Security Environment Policy Brief, presented at the conference “Small States and the New Security Environment,” Nordic House, Reykjavik, Iceland, June 26, 2018. Briffa, H. (2020). Can Small States Have a Grand Strategy? (Ph.D. Thesis), King’s College, London. Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press. Koryogroup (2020). Are There Countries without Coronavirus? https://koryogroup.com/blog/are-there-countries-without-coronavirus, September 20, 2020. Baldacchino, G. and Wivel, A. (2020). Handbook on the Politics of Small States. Edward Elgar Publishing. info:eu-repo/semantics/article Text http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Wright, N. E. (2020). Small States and International Relations Pedagogy: Exploring the Creative Agency Frontier. OASIS, 32, 49-62. Murray, A. SM (2016) Thinking about Political Things: An Aristotelian Approach to Pacific Life. AFT Press. Wright, N. E. (2021). Central Margins: Paradox and Transformation of Dichotomies in Two English Language Novels by Mauritian Lindsey Collen. Journal of Indian Ocean World Studies, 5 (1), 93-113. Verges, F. (2001). Vertigo and Emancipation, Creole Cosmopolitanism and Cultural Politics. Theory, Culture & Society, 18 (2-3), 169-183. Toussaint, A. (1966). History of the Indian Ocean. Routledge. Taylor-Lehman, D. (2020). Sealand. Division Books. Smith, R. (2008). Cyber-states and the ‘Sovereignty’ of Virtual Communities, in E. Kaufman, E. and G. Youngs (Eds.). Globalization: Theory and Practice. (3 ed., pp. 265-276). Continuum International Publishing Group. Rothman, T (2007). The Great Siege of Malta. History Today, January. Pace, R. (2002). A Small State and the European Union: Malta’s EU Accession Experience. South European Society and Politics, 7 (1), 24-42. Bradford, E. (1999). The Great Siege: Malta 1565. Wordsworth edition. Boswell, R. (2006). Le Malaise Creole: Ethnic Identity in Mauritius. Berghahn Books. Allen, B. W. (2017). The Great Siege of Malta: The Epic Battle between the Ottoman Empire and the Knights of St. John. Fore Edge. text/xml En la erudición de las relaciones internacionales (RI), las islas rara vez se consideran, excepto en contextos específicos, y esos contextos rara vez involucran dimensiones que convencionalmente se consideran importantes. La mayoría de las islas, ya sean soberanas, semiautónomas o completamente no autónomas, están relegadas a los márgenes de la erudición de las RI. Este artículo desafía la validez de esta marginación al presentar y examinar islas autónomas tanto soberanas como no soberanas como actores internacionales. Estos ejemplos ilustran la gran paradoja de las islas, a saber, que a lo largo de la historia estas han funcionado como puntos centrales en lugar de ideas secundarias y, debido a ese papel central, las islas encarnan la síntesis de la cultura y la política que constituyen nuevas identidades. Las islas artificiales aportan una mayor complejidad pasada por alto al ejercer una autonomía libre de soberanía. Finalmente, las islas, especialmente los países insulares pequeños, refuerzan y desafían las teorías estándar de relaciones internacionales al ser a la vez autónomos y por necesidad integrados en la globalización. Todas estas características constituyen una centralidad dialéctica, en la que las islas, autosuficientes pero marginadas, juegan un papel central en las relaciones internacionales. Este artículo trae estos territorios colectivamente al frente, con el fin de ilustrar su importancia actualmente subestimada en la disciplina de RI como actores globales. Wright, Nancy relaciones internacionales; pequeños países soberanos; islas; soberanía; autonomía 37 Núm. 37 , Año 2023 : Enero-Junio Artículo de revista Aljazeera (2020, September 14). Which Countries Have Not Reported Any Coronavirus Cases? Aljazeera, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/09/14/which-countries-have-not-reported-any-coronavirus-cases/ application/pdf text/html Publication Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/view/8415 Oasis Nancy WrightI - 2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Español Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. Journal article autonomy Small islands in international relations scholarship: A dialectic centrality In the field of international relations (IR), islands are rarely considered, except in specific contexts which seldom involve dimensions conventionally considered important. Most islands, whether sovereign, semi-autonomous, or completely non-self-governing, are relegated to the margins of IR scholars. This article challenges the validity of this marginalization by presenting and examining both sovereign and non-sovereign autonomous islands as international actors. These examples illustrate the great paradox of islands, namely that throughout history, islands have functioned as pivotal points rather than as afterthoughts, and, because of that central role, islands embody syntheses of culture and politics that constitute new identities, and in some cases unique capabilities. A key example is artificial islands, which illustrate a further overlooked complexity by exerting autonomy free of sovereignty. Finally, islands, especially small island countries, both reinforce and challenge standard IR theories by being at once both self-contained and by necessity integrated globally. All of these characteristics constitute a dialectic centrality, in which islands, self-contained yet marginalized, play a central role in international relations. This article brings these islands collectively to the forefront, with a view to illustrating their currently underestimated importance in the discipline of IR as global actors. This article brings these islands collectively to the forefront, with a view to illustrating their currently underestimated importance in the discipline of IR as global actors. International relations; small sovereign countries; islands; sovereignty; 24 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/8415/13588 10.18601/16577558.n37.03 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/8415/13587 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/8415/13586 7 1657-7558 2022-12-05 2022-12-05T00:00:00Z 2346-2132 https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n37.03 2022-12-05T00:00:00Z |
institution |
UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA |
thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png |
country_str |
Colombia |
collection |
Oasis |
title |
Small islands in international relations scholarship: A dialectic centrality |
spellingShingle |
Small islands in international relations scholarship: A dialectic centrality Wright, Nancy relaciones internacionales; pequeños países soberanos; islas; soberanía; autonomía autonomy International relations; small sovereign countries; islands; sovereignty; |
title_short |
Small islands in international relations scholarship: A dialectic centrality |
title_full |
Small islands in international relations scholarship: A dialectic centrality |
title_fullStr |
Small islands in international relations scholarship: A dialectic centrality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Small islands in international relations scholarship: A dialectic centrality |
title_sort |
small islands in international relations scholarship: a dialectic centrality |
title_eng |
Small islands in international relations scholarship: A dialectic centrality |
description |
En la erudición de las relaciones internacionales (RI), las islas rara vez se consideran, excepto en contextos específicos, y esos contextos rara vez involucran dimensiones que convencionalmente se consideran importantes. La mayoría de las islas, ya sean soberanas, semiautónomas o completamente no autónomas, están relegadas a los márgenes de la erudición de las RI. Este artículo desafía la validez de esta marginación al presentar y examinar islas autónomas tanto soberanas como no soberanas como actores internacionales. Estos ejemplos ilustran la gran paradoja de las islas, a saber, que a lo largo de la historia estas han funcionado como puntos centrales en lugar de ideas secundarias y, debido a ese papel central, las islas encarnan la síntesis de la cultura y la política que constituyen nuevas identidades. Las islas artificiales aportan una mayor complejidad pasada por alto al ejercer una autonomía libre de soberanía. Finalmente, las islas, especialmente los países insulares pequeños, refuerzan y desafían las teorías estándar de relaciones internacionales al ser a la vez autónomos y por necesidad integrados en la globalización. Todas estas características constituyen una centralidad dialéctica, en la que las islas, autosuficientes pero marginadas, juegan un papel central en las relaciones internacionales. Este artículo trae estos territorios colectivamente al frente, con el fin de ilustrar su importancia actualmente subestimada en la disciplina de RI como actores globales.
|
description_eng |
In the field of international relations (IR), islands are rarely considered, except in specific contexts which seldom involve dimensions conventionally considered important. Most islands, whether sovereign, semi-autonomous, or completely non-self-governing, are relegated to the margins of IR scholars. This article challenges the validity of this marginalization by presenting and examining both sovereign and non-sovereign autonomous islands as international actors. These examples illustrate the great paradox of islands, namely that throughout history, islands have functioned as pivotal points rather than as afterthoughts, and, because of that central role, islands embody syntheses of culture and politics that constitute new identities, and in some cases unique capabilities. A key example is artificial islands, which illustrate a further overlooked complexity by exerting autonomy free of sovereignty. Finally, islands, especially small island countries, both reinforce and challenge standard IR theories by being at once both self-contained and by necessity integrated globally. All of these characteristics constitute a dialectic centrality, in which islands, self-contained yet marginalized, play a central role in international relations. This article brings these islands collectively to the forefront, with a view to illustrating their currently underestimated importance in the discipline of IR as global actors. This article brings these islands collectively to the forefront, with a view to illustrating their currently underestimated importance in the discipline of IR as global actors.
|
author |
Wright, Nancy |
author_facet |
Wright, Nancy |
topicspa_str_mv |
relaciones internacionales; pequeños países soberanos; islas; soberanía; autonomía |
topic |
relaciones internacionales; pequeños países soberanos; islas; soberanía; autonomía autonomy International relations; small sovereign countries; islands; sovereignty; |
topic_facet |
relaciones internacionales; pequeños países soberanos; islas; soberanía; autonomía autonomy International relations; small sovereign countries; islands; sovereignty; |
citationissue |
37 |
citationedition |
Núm. 37 , Año 2023 : Enero-Junio |
publisher |
Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales |
ispartofjournal |
Oasis |
source |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/view/8415 |
language |
Español |
format |
Article |
rights |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Nancy WrightI - 2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. |
references |
Hand, F. (2011). Lindsey Collen: The Courage to Be Parochial. Wasafari, 26, 2. Klieger, P. C. (2011). The Microstates of Europe: Designer Nations in a Post-Modern World. Lexington Books. Ingegritsen, C., Neumann, I., Gstöhl, S., and Beyer, J. (Eds.) (2006). Small States in International Relations. University of Washington. Press and University of Iceland Press. Hey, J. (2003). Small States in World Politics: Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior. Lynne Rienner. Hawkins, P. (2008). Until When Shall We Remain Postcolonial? Globalization, Nationalism, and Cultural Self-Determination in the Literatures of the Indian Ocean. E-France: An On-Line Journal of French Studies, 2, 8-18. Hawkins, P. (2007). The Other Hybrid Archipelago: In¬troduction to the Literatures and Cultures of the Francophone Indian Ocean. Lexington Books. Haring, L. (2007). Stars and Keys: Foktales and Creoliza¬tion in the Indian Ocean, trans. Claudie Ricaud and Dawood Auleear. Indiana University Press. Gonzales, A. P., et al. (2022). Caribbean Citizenshipby- Investment Programmes: Performance and Challenges. Caribbean Investigative Journalism Network. Clermont, FL, May 22, 2022. Lobban, R. A. (2018). Cape Verde: Crioulo Colony to Independent Nation. Routledge. Falola, T., Parrott, R. J. and Porter Sanchez, D. (Eds.) (2019). African Islands: Leading Edges of Empire and Globalization. University of Rochester Press. Eccardt, T. (2005). Secrets of the Seven Smallest States of Europe. Hippocrene Books. Duursma, J. C. (1996). Fragmentation and the International Relations of Micro-states: Self-Determination and Statehood. Cambridge University Press. Corbett, J., Veenendaal, W., and Ugyel, L. (2017). Why Monarchy Persists in Small States: The Cases of Tonga, Bhutan, and Liechtenstein. Democratization 24 (4), 689-706. Corbett, J. and Veendaal, W. (2018). Democracy in Small States: Persisting Against All Odds. Oxford University Press. Briffa, H. (2018). Malta: Bridge of the Mediterranean: Neutrality as a Small State, States Seeking Grand Strategy. Small States and the New Security Environment Policy Brief, presented at the conference “Small States and the New Security Environment,” Nordic House, Reykjavik, Iceland, June 26, 2018. Briffa, H. (2020). Can Small States Have a Grand Strategy? (Ph.D. Thesis), King’s College, London. Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press. Koryogroup (2020). Are There Countries without Coronavirus? https://koryogroup.com/blog/are-there-countries-without-coronavirus, September 20, 2020. Baldacchino, G. and Wivel, A. (2020). Handbook on the Politics of Small States. Edward Elgar Publishing. Wright, N. E. (2020). Small States and International Relations Pedagogy: Exploring the Creative Agency Frontier. OASIS, 32, 49-62. Murray, A. SM (2016) Thinking about Political Things: An Aristotelian Approach to Pacific Life. AFT Press. Wright, N. E. (2021). Central Margins: Paradox and Transformation of Dichotomies in Two English Language Novels by Mauritian Lindsey Collen. Journal of Indian Ocean World Studies, 5 (1), 93-113. Verges, F. (2001). Vertigo and Emancipation, Creole Cosmopolitanism and Cultural Politics. Theory, Culture & Society, 18 (2-3), 169-183. Toussaint, A. (1966). History of the Indian Ocean. Routledge. Taylor-Lehman, D. (2020). Sealand. Division Books. Smith, R. (2008). Cyber-states and the ‘Sovereignty’ of Virtual Communities, in E. Kaufman, E. and G. Youngs (Eds.). Globalization: Theory and Practice. (3 ed., pp. 265-276). Continuum International Publishing Group. Rothman, T (2007). The Great Siege of Malta. History Today, January. Pace, R. (2002). A Small State and the European Union: Malta’s EU Accession Experience. South European Society and Politics, 7 (1), 24-42. Bradford, E. (1999). The Great Siege: Malta 1565. Wordsworth edition. Boswell, R. (2006). Le Malaise Creole: Ethnic Identity in Mauritius. Berghahn Books. Allen, B. W. (2017). The Great Siege of Malta: The Epic Battle between the Ottoman Empire and the Knights of St. John. Fore Edge. Aljazeera (2020, September 14). Which Countries Have Not Reported Any Coronavirus Cases? Aljazeera, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/09/14/which-countries-have-not-reported-any-coronavirus-cases/ |
type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
type_content |
Text |
publishDate |
2022-12-05 |
date_accessioned |
2022-12-05T00:00:00Z |
date_available |
2022-12-05T00:00:00Z |
url |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/view/8415 |
url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n37.03 |
issn |
1657-7558 |
eissn |
2346-2132 |
doi |
10.18601/16577558.n37.03 |
citationstartpage |
7 |
citationendpage |
24 |
url4_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/8415/13588 |
url3_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/8415/13587 |
url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/8415/13586 |
_version_ |
1797158035430309888 |