Modelación matemática e ideología en la economía académica

Las fallas generalizadas y duraderas de la economía académica se deben a la excesiva confianza en métodos de análisis matemáticos inapropiados. Muchos economistas heterodoxos piensan que el problema central es una forma de ideología político-económica, que la disciplina va por mal camino porque muchos economistas describen la economía de mercado como un sistema que funciona eficientemente, una descripción que, así sea sincera, es inconsistente con el funcionamiento de la realidad social. Este artículo examina la pretensión de que esa forma de ideología es el problema principal, evalúa su poder explicativo y concluye que no es una buena explicación.

Guardado en:

0124-5996

2346-2450

16

2014-06-13

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id 2edb534babb6dc97d25fffd03d5010f2
record_format ojs
spelling Modelación matemática e ideología en la economía académica
Hahn, F. H. Money and inflation, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1982.
Colander, D.; R. P. Holt, y J. B. Rosser Jr. “The changing face of mainstream economics”, Review of Political Economy 16, 4, 2004, 485-500.
Colander, D.; H. Follmer; A. Hass et al. “The financial crisis and the systemic failure of academic economics”, mimeo, 2008, [http://www. debtdeflation.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/papers/Dahlem_Report_ EconCrisis021809.pdf ].
Davis, J. B. “Heterodox economics, the fragmentation of the mainstream and embedded individual analysis”, R. Garnett y J. Harvey, eds., The future of heterodox economics, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press, 2005.
Dixon, H. “Equilibrium and explanation”, J. Creedy, ed., Foundations of economic thought, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1990.
Eagleton, T. Ideology: An introduction, London, Verso, 1991.
Fullbrook, E. Ontology and economics: Tony Lawson and his critics, London y New York, Routledge, 2009.
Gillies, D. “Can mathematics be used successfully in economics?”, E. Fullbrook, ed., A guide to what’s wrong with economics, London, Anthem Press, 2004, pp. 187-197.
Gingras, Y. “What did mathematics do to physics?”, History of Science 39, 4, 2001, pp. 383-416.
Goodwin, C. D. “The patrons of economics in a time of transformation”, M. S. Morgan y M. Rutherford, eds., From interwar pluralism to postwar neoclassicism, annual supplement to vol. 30, History of Political Economy, Duke, Duke University Press, 1998.
Guerrien, B. “Irrelevance and ideology”, Post-Autistic Economics Review 29, 6, 2004, article 3.
Hahn, F. H. “Some adjustment problems”, Econometrica 38, 1, 1970, pp. 1-17.
Hahn, F. H. “Reflections”, Royal Economics Society Newsletter 77, 1992a.
Bloom, A. The closing of the American mind, New York, Simon and Schuster, 1987.
Hahn, F. H. “Answer to Backhouse: Yes”, Royal Economic Society Newsletter 78, 1992b.
Hahn, F. H. “An intellectual retrospect”, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 190, 1994, pp. 245-258.
Henry, J. The scientific revolution and the origins of modern science, New York, 1997.
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Coats, A. W. On the history of economic thought: British and American economic essays, vol. I, London y New York, Routledge, 1992.
Bigo, V. “Explaining modern economics (as a microcosm of society)”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 32, 4, 2008, pp. 527-554.
Publication
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Las fallas generalizadas y duraderas de la economía académica se deben a la excesiva confianza en métodos de análisis matemáticos inapropiados. Muchos economistas heterodoxos piensan que el problema central es una forma de ideología político-económica, que la disciplina va por mal camino porque muchos economistas describen la economía de mercado como un sistema que funciona eficientemente, una descripción que, así sea sincera, es inconsistente con el funcionamiento de la realidad social. Este artículo examina la pretensión de que esa forma de ideología es el problema principal, evalúa su poder explicativo y concluye que no es una buena explicación.
Lawson, Tony
métodos matemáticos
análisis económico
economía heterodoxa
16
30
Núm. 30 , Año 2014 : Enero-Junio
Artículo de revista
Español
application/pdf
Universidad Externado de Colombia
Revista de Economía Institucional
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/3776
Mathematical modelling and ideology in the economics academy
mathematical methods
The widespread and long-lived failings of academic economics are due to an over-reliance on largely inappropriate mathematical methods of analysis. Many heterodox economists, however, appear to hold instead that the central problem is a form of political-economic ideology. Specifically, it is widely contended in heterodox circles that the discipline goes astray just because so many economists are committed to a portrayal of the market economy as a smoothly or efficiently functioning system or some such, a portrayal that, whether sincerely held or otherwise, is inconsistent with the workings of social reality. Here I critically examine the contention that a form of political-economic ideology of this sort is the primary problem and assess its explanatory power. I conclude that the contention does not fare very well.
economic analysis
heterodox economy
Journal article
2014-06-13T00:00:00Z
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/3776/3922
0124-5996
2346-2450
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/3776
2014-06-13
2014-06-13T00:00:00Z
institution UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista de Economía Institucional
title Modelación matemática e ideología en la economía académica
spellingShingle Modelación matemática e ideología en la economía académica
Lawson, Tony
métodos matemáticos
análisis económico
economía heterodoxa
mathematical methods
economic analysis
heterodox economy
title_short Modelación matemática e ideología en la economía académica
title_full Modelación matemática e ideología en la economía académica
title_fullStr Modelación matemática e ideología en la economía académica
title_full_unstemmed Modelación matemática e ideología en la economía académica
title_sort modelación matemática e ideología en la economía académica
title_eng Mathematical modelling and ideology in the economics academy
description Las fallas generalizadas y duraderas de la economía académica se deben a la excesiva confianza en métodos de análisis matemáticos inapropiados. Muchos economistas heterodoxos piensan que el problema central es una forma de ideología político-económica, que la disciplina va por mal camino porque muchos economistas describen la economía de mercado como un sistema que funciona eficientemente, una descripción que, así sea sincera, es inconsistente con el funcionamiento de la realidad social. Este artículo examina la pretensión de que esa forma de ideología es el problema principal, evalúa su poder explicativo y concluye que no es una buena explicación.
description_eng The widespread and long-lived failings of academic economics are due to an over-reliance on largely inappropriate mathematical methods of analysis. Many heterodox economists, however, appear to hold instead that the central problem is a form of political-economic ideology. Specifically, it is widely contended in heterodox circles that the discipline goes astray just because so many economists are committed to a portrayal of the market economy as a smoothly or efficiently functioning system or some such, a portrayal that, whether sincerely held or otherwise, is inconsistent with the workings of social reality. Here I critically examine the contention that a form of political-economic ideology of this sort is the primary problem and assess its explanatory power. I conclude that the contention does not fare very well.
author Lawson, Tony
author_facet Lawson, Tony
topicspa_str_mv métodos matemáticos
análisis económico
economía heterodoxa
topic métodos matemáticos
análisis económico
economía heterodoxa
mathematical methods
economic analysis
heterodox economy
topic_facet métodos matemáticos
análisis económico
economía heterodoxa
mathematical methods
economic analysis
heterodox economy
citationvolume 16
citationissue 30
citationedition Núm. 30 , Año 2014 : Enero-Junio
publisher Universidad Externado de Colombia
ispartofjournal Revista de Economía Institucional
source https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/3776
language Español
format Article
rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
references Hahn, F. H. Money and inflation, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1982.
Colander, D.; R. P. Holt, y J. B. Rosser Jr. “The changing face of mainstream economics”, Review of Political Economy 16, 4, 2004, 485-500.
Colander, D.; H. Follmer; A. Hass et al. “The financial crisis and the systemic failure of academic economics”, mimeo, 2008, [http://www. debtdeflation.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/papers/Dahlem_Report_ EconCrisis021809.pdf ].
Davis, J. B. “Heterodox economics, the fragmentation of the mainstream and embedded individual analysis”, R. Garnett y J. Harvey, eds., The future of heterodox economics, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press, 2005.
Dixon, H. “Equilibrium and explanation”, J. Creedy, ed., Foundations of economic thought, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1990.
Eagleton, T. Ideology: An introduction, London, Verso, 1991.
Fullbrook, E. Ontology and economics: Tony Lawson and his critics, London y New York, Routledge, 2009.
Gillies, D. “Can mathematics be used successfully in economics?”, E. Fullbrook, ed., A guide to what’s wrong with economics, London, Anthem Press, 2004, pp. 187-197.
Gingras, Y. “What did mathematics do to physics?”, History of Science 39, 4, 2001, pp. 383-416.
Goodwin, C. D. “The patrons of economics in a time of transformation”, M. S. Morgan y M. Rutherford, eds., From interwar pluralism to postwar neoclassicism, annual supplement to vol. 30, History of Political Economy, Duke, Duke University Press, 1998.
Guerrien, B. “Irrelevance and ideology”, Post-Autistic Economics Review 29, 6, 2004, article 3.
Hahn, F. H. “Some adjustment problems”, Econometrica 38, 1, 1970, pp. 1-17.
Hahn, F. H. “Reflections”, Royal Economics Society Newsletter 77, 1992a.
Bloom, A. The closing of the American mind, New York, Simon and Schuster, 1987.
Hahn, F. H. “Answer to Backhouse: Yes”, Royal Economic Society Newsletter 78, 1992b.
Hahn, F. H. “An intellectual retrospect”, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 190, 1994, pp. 245-258.
Henry, J. The scientific revolution and the origins of modern science, New York, 1997.
Coats, A. W. On the history of economic thought: British and American economic essays, vol. I, London y New York, Routledge, 1992.
Bigo, V. “Explaining modern economics (as a microcosm of society)”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 32, 4, 2008, pp. 527-554.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2014-06-13
date_accessioned 2014-06-13T00:00:00Z
date_available 2014-06-13T00:00:00Z
url https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/3776
url_doi https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/3776
issn 0124-5996
eissn 2346-2450
url2_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/3776/3922
_version_ 1797158241500659712