Globo analógo de tareas de riesgo para evaluar toma de desiciones en lesiones cerebrales adquiridas

Introducción: a pesar de que el deterioro en la toma de decisiones es una consecuencia frecuente en las lesiones del lóbulo frontal, pocos son los instrumentos que evalúan la toma de decisiones en pacientes con lesiones cerebrales adquiridas (ABI). La mayoría son difíciles de utilizar y requieren una capacidad bien conservada de las funciones de comprensión y ejecutivas verbales complejas. Proponemos el globo analógico de tareas de riesgo (BART) como un instrumento alternativo para evaluar la toma de decisiones en las ABI. Material y métodos: globo analógica de tareas de riesgo (BART) y juego de azar de Lowa (IGT) se administraron a un grupo clínico de 30 pacientes con ABI y a un grupo control de 30 participantes sanos; se realizó un estudi... Ver más

Guardado en:

2011-2084

2011-7922

9

2015-01-01

30

39

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

International Journal of Psychological Research - 2016

id 2dc6aea83a7f131665aed3eac0046620
record_format ojs
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection International Journal of Psychological Research
title Globo analógo de tareas de riesgo para evaluar toma de desiciones en lesiones cerebrales adquiridas
spellingShingle Globo analógo de tareas de riesgo para evaluar toma de desiciones en lesiones cerebrales adquiridas
Areny Balagueró, Marina
Jodar Vicente, Mercè
balón análogo de tareas de riesgo
toma de decisiones
lesion cerebral adquirida
acquired brain injury
Decision-making
Balloon Analogue Risk Task
Iowa Gambling Task
title_short Globo analógo de tareas de riesgo para evaluar toma de desiciones en lesiones cerebrales adquiridas
title_full Globo analógo de tareas de riesgo para evaluar toma de desiciones en lesiones cerebrales adquiridas
title_fullStr Globo analógo de tareas de riesgo para evaluar toma de desiciones en lesiones cerebrales adquiridas
title_full_unstemmed Globo analógo de tareas de riesgo para evaluar toma de desiciones en lesiones cerebrales adquiridas
title_sort globo analógo de tareas de riesgo para evaluar toma de desiciones en lesiones cerebrales adquiridas
description Introducción: a pesar de que el deterioro en la toma de decisiones es una consecuencia frecuente en las lesiones del lóbulo frontal, pocos son los instrumentos que evalúan la toma de decisiones en pacientes con lesiones cerebrales adquiridas (ABI). La mayoría son difíciles de utilizar y requieren una capacidad bien conservada de las funciones de comprensión y ejecutivas verbales complejas. Proponemos el globo analógico de tareas de riesgo (BART) como un instrumento alternativo para evaluar la toma de decisiones en las ABI. Material y métodos: globo analógica de tareas de riesgo (BART) y juego de azar de Lowa (IGT) se administraron a un grupo clínico de 30 pacientes con ABI y a un grupo control de 30 participantes sanos; se realizó un estudio comparativo para evaluar las posibles diferencias en los resultados obtenidos y un análisis para determinar una posible correlación de las pruebas entre los grupos. Resultados: Los resultados mostraron que el BART es un instrumento sensible para detectar diferencias en el rendimiento entre un grupo control y un grupo de pacientes con ABI, p <0,001; IC del 95% = 537,21 a 1.575,46, pero no se correlacionan con IGT, p = 0.524, rab.c = -.134. Conclusiones: a pesar de que IGT y BART fueron diseñados para evaluar la toma de decisiones, los resultados obtenidos en nuestro estudio muestran que las puntuaciones obtenidas por los pacientes con ABI en ambas pruebas no se correlacionan. Esto demuestra claramente que la pruebas IGT y BART miden diferentes aspectos de la toma de decisiones.
description_eng Introduction: Although impairment in decision-making is a frequent consequence of frontal lobe injury, few instruments evaluate decision-making in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). Most are difficult to use and require a well-preserved ability of complex verbal comprehension and executive functions. We propose the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) as an alternative instrument to evaluate decision-making in ABI. Material and Methods: Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) and Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) were administered to a clinical group of 30 patients with ABI and to a control group of 30 healthy participants; comparative study to assess possible differences in the results obtained; analysis to determine a possible correlation between the two tests between groups. Results: The results showed that BART is a sensitive instrument to detect differences in performance between a control group and a group of patients with ABI, p < .001, 95 % CI =537.21-1575.46,  but do not correlate with  IGT, p = .524, rab.c = ‒.134. Conclusions: Although IGT and BART were both designed to assess decision-making, the results obtained in our study show that the scores obtained by patients with ABI on both tests do not correlate. This clearly proves that IGT and BART measure different aspects of decision-making.
author Areny Balagueró, Marina
Jodar Vicente, Mercè
author_facet Areny Balagueró, Marina
Jodar Vicente, Mercè
topicspa_str_mv balón análogo de tareas de riesgo
toma de decisiones
lesion cerebral adquirida
topic balón análogo de tareas de riesgo
toma de decisiones
lesion cerebral adquirida
acquired brain injury
Decision-making
Balloon Analogue Risk Task
Iowa Gambling Task
topic_facet balón análogo de tareas de riesgo
toma de decisiones
lesion cerebral adquirida
acquired brain injury
Decision-making
Balloon Analogue Risk Task
Iowa Gambling Task
citationvolume 9
citationissue 1
publisher Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
ispartofjournal International Journal of Psychological Research
source https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/2098
language Inglés
format Article
rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
International Journal of Psychological Research - 2016
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
references_eng Acheson, A., Richards, J.B. & Wit, H. (2007). Effects of sleep deprivation on impulsive behaviors in men and women. Physiol Behav, 91(5), 579–587 Alameda, J.R., Paíno, S. y Mogedas, A.I. (2012). Toma de decisiones en consumidores de cannabis. Adicciones, 24(2), 161-172. Alberdi, F., Iriarte, M., Mendía, A., Murgialda, A. & Marco, P. (2009). Prognosis of the sequels after brain injury. Medicina Intensiva, 33, 171-81. doi:10.1016/S0210-5691(09)71213-6. Benjamin, A. M., & Robbins, S. J. (2007). The role of framing effects in performance on the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 221– 230. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.026. Bonatti, E., Zamarian, L., Wagner , M., Benke, T., Hollosi, P. & Strubreither, W. (2008). Making decisions and advising decisions in traumatic brain injury. Cogn Behav Neurol., 21, 164-175. doi doi: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e318184e688. Buelow, M.T. & Blaine, A.L. (2015). The assessment of risky decision making: A factor analysis of performance on the Iowa gambling task, balloon analogue risk task, and Columbia card task. Psychol Asess, 27(3), 777-85. doi: 10.1037/a0038622. Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H. & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7-15. doi:10.10163/0010-0277(64)90018-3. Bechara, A. (2007). Iowa Gambling Task: Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resourses, Inc. Biringer, E., Lundervold, A., Stordal, K., Mykletun, A., Egeland, J., Bottlender, R., & Lund, A. (2005). Executive function improvement upon remission of recurrent unipolar depression. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 255, 373-380. doi:10.1007/s00406-0052-0577-7. Broche-Pérez Y., Cortés-González, L. & Omar-Martínez, E. (2015). Toma de decisiones en jóvenes con conductas antisociales: Evidencias desde el Iowa Gambling Task. Neurología Argentina doi:10.1016/j.neuarg.2015.03.006. Cardoso, C.O., Branco, L.D., Cotrena, C., Kristensen, C.H., SchneiderBakos, D.D.G. & Fonseca, R.P. (2014). The impact of frontal and cerebellar lesions on decision making: evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task. Front Neurosci, 8 doi: 10.1590/S0047-20852010000400003. Collette, F., Hogge, M., Salmon, E., & Van der Linden, M. (2006). Exploration of the neural substrates of executive functioning by functional neuroimaging. Neuroscience, 139, 209- 221. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.05.035. Damasio, A. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 351, 1413-1420. doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0125. Davidson, P. S., Gao, F .Q., Mason, W. P., Winocur, G., & Anderson, N. D. (2007). Verbal fluency, Trail Making and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance following right frontal lobe tumor resection. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 1-15. doi:10.1080/13803390601161166. Disability National Observatory (2011, January 20). New Data on the Incidence of DCA. Retrieved from: http://www.fedace.org/portal/index.php/noticias-de-actualidad/136-datosdca.html. Fecteau, S., Pascual-Leone, A., Zald, D. H., Liguori, P., Théoret, H., Boggio, P. S., & Fregni, F. (2007). Activation of prefrontal cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation reduces appetite for risk during ambiguous decision making. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(23), 6212–8. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0314-07.2007 Fisk, J. E., & Sharp, C. A. (2004) Age related impairment in executive functioning: Updating, inhibition, shifting and access. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 874-890. doi:10.1080/13803390490510680. García Molina, A., Roig Rovira, T., Yuguero Rueda, M., Enseñat Cantallops, A. Bernabeu, M., Sánchez-Carrión, R (2008). Community integration as an outcome of traumatic brain injury neurorehabilitation. Rehabilitación, 42, 67-72. doi:10.1016/S0048-7120(08)73616-8. Killgore, W. D. S. (2007). Effects of sleep deprivation and morningness-eveningness traits on risk-taking. Psychological Reports, 100, 613–626. doi:10.2466/PR0.100.2.613-626 Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., Strong, D. R., & Brown, R. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75-84. doi:10.1037//1076-898X.8.2.75. Lejuez, W. C., Akalín, M. W., Zvolensky, J. M., & Pedulla, M. C. (2003). Evaluation of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) as a predictor of adolescent real-world risk-taking behaviors. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 475-479. doi:10.1016/S0140-1971(03)00036-8. Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, W. M., Jones, H. A., Richards, J. B., Strong, D. R., Kahler, C. W. et al. (2003). The balloon analogue risk task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11(1), 26-33. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.11.1.26. Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, W. M., Daughters, S. B., Zvolensky, M. J., Kahler, C. W., & Gwadz, M. (2007). Reliability and validity of the youth version of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART-Y) in the assessment of risk-taking behavior among inner-city adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 106–111.doi: 10.1080/15374410709336573. Lighthall NR, Sakaki M, Vasunilashorn S, Somayajula S, Chen E, Mather M. (2009). Sex differences in stress effects on brain activation and behavior during risk taking. Cognitive Neuroscience Society Annual Meeting. San Francisco, CA Livingstone, S. A., & Skelton, R. W. (2007). Virtual environment navigation tasks and the assessment of cognitive deficits in individuals with brain injury. Behavioural Brain Research, 185, 21-31. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2007.07.015. Madrazo, L. M., Machuca, M. F., Barrosso, J. M., Domínguez, M. D. & León-Carrión, J. (1999). Emotional changes after severe traumatic brain injury. Revista Española de Neurología, 1, 75-82. Martínez-Selva, J. M., Sánchez-Navarro, J. P., Bechara, A., & Román, F. (2006). Brain mechanisms involved in decision making. Revista de Neurología, 42, 411-418. MacPherson, L., Magidson, J. F., Reynolds, E. K., Kahler, C. W., & Lejuez, C. W. (2010). Changes in sensation seeking and risktaking propensity predict increases in alcohol use among early adolescents. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 34, 1400–08. doi: 10.1007/s11121-010-0172-7. Miura, H. (2009). Differences in frontal lobe function between violent and nonviolent conduct disorder in male adolescents. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 63, 161–166 Mogedas, A.I. & Alameda, J.R. (2011). Toma de decisiones en pacientes drogodependientes. Adicciones, 23, 277-287 Rochat, L., Beni, C., Billieux, J., Azouvi, P., Annoni, J. M. & Van der Linden, M. (2010). Assessment of impulsivity after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20(5), 778-797. doi:10.1080/09602011.2010.495245. Sigurdardottir, S., Andelic, N., Roe, C. & Schanke, A. K. (2009). Cognitive recovery and predictors of functional outcome 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15, 740-750. doi:10.1017/S1355617709990452. Sigurdardottir, S., Andelic, N., Roe, C. & Schanke, A. K. (2010). Cognitive recovery and predictors of functional outcome 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15, 740-750. doi:10.1017/S1355617709990452. Strenziok, M., Pulaski, S., Krueger, F., Zamboni, G., Clawson, D., & Grafman, J. (2011) Regional Brain Atrophy and Impaired Decision Making on the Balloon Analog Risk Task in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 24(2), 59-67. doi:10.1097/WNN.0b013e3182255a7c. Strauss, E., Sherman, E., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.) (pp. 32-37). NY: Oxford University Press. Van Noordt, S. & Good, D. (2011). Mild head injury and sympathetic arousal: Investigating relationships with decision-making and neuropsychological performance in university students. Brain Injury, 25(7-8), 707-716. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.580312. Young, S., Gudjonsson, G., Carter, P., Terry, R., & Morris, R. (2012). Simulation of risk- taking and it relationship with personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 294-299. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.014
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2015-01-01
date_accessioned 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/2098
url_doi https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.2098
issn 2011-2084
eissn 2011-7922
doi 10.21500/20112084.2098
citationstartpage 30
citationendpage 39
url2_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2098/1875
_version_ 1797160030187814912
spelling Globo analógo de tareas de riesgo para evaluar toma de desiciones en lesiones cerebrales adquiridas
Globo analógo de tareas de riesgo para evaluar toma de desiciones en lesiones cerebrales adquiridas
Artículo de revista
balón análogo de tareas de riesgo
toma de decisiones
lesion cerebral adquirida
Introducción: a pesar de que el deterioro en la toma de decisiones es una consecuencia frecuente en las lesiones del lóbulo frontal, pocos son los instrumentos que evalúan la toma de decisiones en pacientes con lesiones cerebrales adquiridas (ABI). La mayoría son difíciles de utilizar y requieren una capacidad bien conservada de las funciones de comprensión y ejecutivas verbales complejas. Proponemos el globo analógico de tareas de riesgo (BART) como un instrumento alternativo para evaluar la toma de decisiones en las ABI. Material y métodos: globo analógica de tareas de riesgo (BART) y juego de azar de Lowa (IGT) se administraron a un grupo clínico de 30 pacientes con ABI y a un grupo control de 30 participantes sanos; se realizó un estudio comparativo para evaluar las posibles diferencias en los resultados obtenidos y un análisis para determinar una posible correlación de las pruebas entre los grupos. Resultados: Los resultados mostraron que el BART es un instrumento sensible para detectar diferencias en el rendimiento entre un grupo control y un grupo de pacientes con ABI, p <0,001; IC del 95% = 537,21 a 1.575,46, pero no se correlacionan con IGT, p = 0.524, rab.c = -.134. Conclusiones: a pesar de que IGT y BART fueron diseñados para evaluar la toma de decisiones, los resultados obtenidos en nuestro estudio muestran que las puntuaciones obtenidas por los pacientes con ABI en ambas pruebas no se correlacionan. Esto demuestra claramente que la pruebas IGT y BART miden diferentes aspectos de la toma de decisiones.
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Acheson, A., Richards, J.B. & Wit, H. (2007). Effects of sleep deprivation on impulsive behaviors in men and women. Physiol Behav, 91(5), 579–587 Alameda, J.R., Paíno, S. y Mogedas, A.I. (2012). Toma de decisiones en consumidores de cannabis. Adicciones, 24(2), 161-172. Alberdi, F., Iriarte, M., Mendía, A., Murgialda, A. & Marco, P. (2009). Prognosis of the sequels after brain injury. Medicina Intensiva, 33, 171-81. doi:10.1016/S0210-5691(09)71213-6. Benjamin, A. M., & Robbins, S. J. (2007). The role of framing effects in performance on the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 221– 230. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.026. Bonatti, E., Zamarian, L., Wagner , M., Benke, T., Hollosi, P. & Strubreither, W. (2008). Making decisions and advising decisions in traumatic brain injury. Cogn Behav Neurol., 21, 164-175. doi doi: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e318184e688. Buelow, M.T. & Blaine, A.L. (2015). The assessment of risky decision making: A factor analysis of performance on the Iowa gambling task, balloon analogue risk task, and Columbia card task. Psychol Asess, 27(3), 777-85. doi: 10.1037/a0038622. Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H. & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7-15. doi:10.10163/0010-0277(64)90018-3. Bechara, A. (2007). Iowa Gambling Task: Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resourses, Inc. Biringer, E., Lundervold, A., Stordal, K., Mykletun, A., Egeland, J., Bottlender, R., & Lund, A. (2005). Executive function improvement upon remission of recurrent unipolar depression. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 255, 373-380. doi:10.1007/s00406-0052-0577-7. Broche-Pérez Y., Cortés-González, L. & Omar-Martínez, E. (2015). Toma de decisiones en jóvenes con conductas antisociales: Evidencias desde el Iowa Gambling Task. Neurología Argentina doi:10.1016/j.neuarg.2015.03.006. Cardoso, C.O., Branco, L.D., Cotrena, C., Kristensen, C.H., SchneiderBakos, D.D.G. & Fonseca, R.P. (2014). The impact of frontal and cerebellar lesions on decision making: evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task. Front Neurosci, 8 doi: 10.1590/S0047-20852010000400003. Collette, F., Hogge, M., Salmon, E., & Van der Linden, M. (2006). Exploration of the neural substrates of executive functioning by functional neuroimaging. Neuroscience, 139, 209- 221. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.05.035. Damasio, A. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 351, 1413-1420. doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0125. Davidson, P. S., Gao, F .Q., Mason, W. P., Winocur, G., & Anderson, N. D. (2007). Verbal fluency, Trail Making and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance following right frontal lobe tumor resection. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 1-15. doi:10.1080/13803390601161166. Disability National Observatory (2011, January 20). New Data on the Incidence of DCA. Retrieved from: http://www.fedace.org/portal/index.php/noticias-de-actualidad/136-datosdca.html. Fecteau, S., Pascual-Leone, A., Zald, D. H., Liguori, P., Théoret, H., Boggio, P. S., & Fregni, F. (2007). Activation of prefrontal cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation reduces appetite for risk during ambiguous decision making. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(23), 6212–8. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0314-07.2007 Fisk, J. E., & Sharp, C. A. (2004) Age related impairment in executive functioning: Updating, inhibition, shifting and access. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 874-890. doi:10.1080/13803390490510680. García Molina, A., Roig Rovira, T., Yuguero Rueda, M., Enseñat Cantallops, A. Bernabeu, M., Sánchez-Carrión, R (2008). Community integration as an outcome of traumatic brain injury neurorehabilitation. Rehabilitación, 42, 67-72. doi:10.1016/S0048-7120(08)73616-8. Killgore, W. D. S. (2007). Effects of sleep deprivation and morningness-eveningness traits on risk-taking. Psychological Reports, 100, 613–626. doi:10.2466/PR0.100.2.613-626 Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., Strong, D. R., & Brown, R. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75-84. doi:10.1037//1076-898X.8.2.75. Lejuez, W. C., Akalín, M. W., Zvolensky, J. M., & Pedulla, M. C. (2003). Evaluation of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) as a predictor of adolescent real-world risk-taking behaviors. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 475-479. doi:10.1016/S0140-1971(03)00036-8. Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, W. M., Jones, H. A., Richards, J. B., Strong, D. R., Kahler, C. W. et al. (2003). The balloon analogue risk task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11(1), 26-33. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.11.1.26. Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, W. M., Daughters, S. B., Zvolensky, M. J., Kahler, C. W., & Gwadz, M. (2007). Reliability and validity of the youth version of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART-Y) in the assessment of risk-taking behavior among inner-city adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 106–111.doi: 10.1080/15374410709336573. Lighthall NR, Sakaki M, Vasunilashorn S, Somayajula S, Chen E, Mather M. (2009). Sex differences in stress effects on brain activation and behavior during risk taking. Cognitive Neuroscience Society Annual Meeting. San Francisco, CA Livingstone, S. A., & Skelton, R. W. (2007). Virtual environment navigation tasks and the assessment of cognitive deficits in individuals with brain injury. Behavioural Brain Research, 185, 21-31. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2007.07.015. Madrazo, L. M., Machuca, M. F., Barrosso, J. M., Domínguez, M. D. & León-Carrión, J. (1999). Emotional changes after severe traumatic brain injury. Revista Española de Neurología, 1, 75-82. Martínez-Selva, J. M., Sánchez-Navarro, J. P., Bechara, A., & Román, F. (2006). Brain mechanisms involved in decision making. Revista de Neurología, 42, 411-418. MacPherson, L., Magidson, J. F., Reynolds, E. K., Kahler, C. W., & Lejuez, C. W. (2010). Changes in sensation seeking and risktaking propensity predict increases in alcohol use among early adolescents. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 34, 1400–08. doi: 10.1007/s11121-010-0172-7. Miura, H. (2009). Differences in frontal lobe function between violent and nonviolent conduct disorder in male adolescents. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 63, 161–166 Mogedas, A.I. & Alameda, J.R. (2011). Toma de decisiones en pacientes drogodependientes. Adicciones, 23, 277-287 Rochat, L., Beni, C., Billieux, J., Azouvi, P., Annoni, J. M. & Van der Linden, M. (2010). Assessment of impulsivity after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20(5), 778-797. doi:10.1080/09602011.2010.495245. Sigurdardottir, S., Andelic, N., Roe, C. & Schanke, A. K. (2009). Cognitive recovery and predictors of functional outcome 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15, 740-750. doi:10.1017/S1355617709990452. Sigurdardottir, S., Andelic, N., Roe, C. & Schanke, A. K. (2010). Cognitive recovery and predictors of functional outcome 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15, 740-750. doi:10.1017/S1355617709990452. Strenziok, M., Pulaski, S., Krueger, F., Zamboni, G., Clawson, D., & Grafman, J. (2011) Regional Brain Atrophy and Impaired Decision Making on the Balloon Analog Risk Task in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 24(2), 59-67. doi:10.1097/WNN.0b013e3182255a7c. Strauss, E., Sherman, E., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.) (pp. 32-37). NY: Oxford University Press. Van Noordt, S. & Good, D. (2011). Mild head injury and sympathetic arousal: Investigating relationships with decision-making and neuropsychological performance in university students. Brain Injury, 25(7-8), 707-716. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.580312. Young, S., Gudjonsson, G., Carter, P., Terry, R., & Morris, R. (2012). Simulation of risk- taking and it relationship with personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 294-299. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.014
International Journal of Psychological Research - 2016
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Inglés
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/2098
International Journal of Psychological Research
Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
application/pdf
9
Introduction: Although impairment in decision-making is a frequent consequence of frontal lobe injury, few instruments evaluate decision-making in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). Most are difficult to use and require a well-preserved ability of complex verbal comprehension and executive functions. We propose the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) as an alternative instrument to evaluate decision-making in ABI. Material and Methods: Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) and Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) were administered to a clinical group of 30 patients with ABI and to a control group of 30 healthy participants; comparative study to assess possible differences in the results obtained; analysis to determine a possible correlation between the two tests between groups. Results: The results showed that BART is a sensitive instrument to detect differences in performance between a control group and a group of patients with ABI, p < .001, 95 % CI =537.21-1575.46,  but do not correlate with  IGT, p = .524, rab.c = ‒.134. Conclusions: Although IGT and BART were both designed to assess decision-making, the results obtained in our study show that the scores obtained by patients with ABI on both tests do not correlate. This clearly proves that IGT and BART measure different aspects of decision-making.
Areny Balagueró, Marina
Jodar Vicente, Mercè
acquired brain injury
Decision-making
Balloon Analogue Risk Task
Iowa Gambling Task
Publication
1
Journal article
30
2015-01-01
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2098/1875
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.2098
10.21500/20112084.2098
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
2011-7922
2011-2084
39