La endogamia en la producción animal

La endogamia en la producción animal

Se realizó una revisión literaria acerca de las ventajas y desventajas de utilizar la endogamia (cruce de individuos emparentados) directa o indirectamente en los sistemas de producción animal. La endogamia actúa en las poblaciones de animales silvestres y domesticadas reduciendo la variabilidad genética dentro de las poblaciones, disminuyendo la heterocigocidad, y aumentando la probabilidad de heredar a las siguientes generaciones alelos asociados a defectos genéticos, lo que se traduce finalmente en una reducción en la capacidad de adaptación de los animales al medio ambiente y un aumento en el riesgo de extinción. También se ha demostrado que el aumento de la endogamia a menudo se asocia con una reducción en el valor promedio de una o má... Ver más

Guardado en:

Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA

2027-4297

OCAMPO G., RICARDO

CARDONA C., HENRY

UNIVERSIDAD DE SUCRE

10.24188/recia.v5.n2.2013.458

5

2013-07-12

463

479

Colombia

Heterocigocidad

mejoramiento genético

selección

variabilidad genética.

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

id 233db37a1944e6c47c9582c77f95f295
record_format ojs
spelling La endogamia en la producción animal
HEINS, B.J.; HANSEN, L.B.; SEYKORA, A.J. 2006. Production of pure Holsteins versus crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red. Rev J. Dairy Sci 89:2799-2804. HUBBARD, D.J.; SOUTHWOOD, O.I.; KENNEDY, B.W. 1990. Rates of inbreeding in Yorkshire, Landacre, Duroc, and Hampshire performance tested pigs in Ontario. Rev Canadian Journal of Animal Science 70:401-407.
NORMAN, H.D.; POWELL, R.L.; WRIGHT, J.R.; SATTLER, C.G. 2001. Overview of progeny-test programs of artificial insemination organizations in the United States. Rev J. Dairy Sci 84:1899-1912.
MIGLIOR, F.; BURNSIDE, E. 1995. Genetics and Breeding. Rev J. Dairy Sci 78:1167. NOMURA, T.; HONDA, T.; MUKAI, F. 2001. Inbreeding and effective population size of Japanese black cattle. Rev Journal of Animal Science 79:366-370.
MEUWISSEN, T.H.E. 1997. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Rev Journal of Animal Science 75:934-940.
MATZ, B. 2011. Crossing, grading, and keeping pure: animal breeding and exchange around 1860. Rev Endeavour 35:7-15. MC PARLAND, S.; KEARNEY, J.F.; BERRY, D.P. 2007. Inbreeding effects on milk production, calving performance, fertility, and conformation in Irish Holstein- Friesians. Rev J. Dairy Sci 90:4411-4419.
MARIE, J.; CHARPENTIER, E.; WILLIAMS, C. 2008. Inbreeding depression in ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta): genetic diversity predicts parasitism, immunocompetence, and survivorship. Rev Conservation Genetics 9:1605-1615.
KELLER, L.F. 1994. Selection against inbred song sparrows during a natural population bottleneck. Rev Nature 372:356-357.
KELLER, L.F.; WALLER, D.M. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Rev Trends Ecol Evol 17:230-241.
HEINS, B.J.; HANSEN, L.B.; SEYKORA, A.J. 2006. Fertility and survival of pure Holsteins versus crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red. Rev J. Dairy Sci 89:4944-4951.
NOTTER, D.R. 1999. The Importance of Genetic Diversity in Livestock Populations of the Future. Rev Journal of Animal Science 77:61-69. PEDROSA, V.B.; SANTANA, M.L.; OLIVEIRA, P.S. 2010. Population structure and inbreeding effects on growth traits of Santa Ines sheep in Brazil. Rev Small Ruminant Research 93:135-139.
HAYES, B.J.; LEWIN, H.A.; GODDARD, M.E. 2013. The future of livestock breeding: genomic selection for efficiency, reduced emissions intensity, and adaptation. Rev Trends in Genetics. In press.
HANSEN, L.B. 2006. Monitoring the worldwide genetic supply for cattle with emphasis on managing crossbreeding and inbreeding. En: Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Memorias. Belo Horizonte, Brasil.
GUEST, B. 2008. Consanguinidad en bovinos. Rev Angus 241:54-44. GUITOU, H. 2010. Coeficiente de consanguinidad de un individuo. Sistemas de apareamiento. Rev Angus 248:31-37.
GEROSA, S.; SKOET, J. 2013. Milk Availability: Trends in production and emand and medium-term Outlook. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura. GOYARD, E.; GOARANT, C.; ANSQUER, D.; PIERRE, B.; DE DECKER, S.; DUFOUR, R.; GALINIE, C.; PEIGNON, J.; PHAM, D.; VOUREY, E.; HARACHE, Y.; PATROIS, J. 2008. Cross breeding of different domesticated lines as a simple way for genetic improvement in small aquaculture industries: Heterosis and inbreeding effects on growth and survival rates of the Pacific blue shrimp Penaeus (Litopenaeus) stylirostris). Rev Aquaculture 278:43-50.
GAMA, L.T.; BRESSAN, M.C.; RODRIGUES, E.C.; ROSSATO, L.V.; MOREIRA, O.C.; ALVES, S.P.; BESSA, R.J. 2013. Heterosis for meat quality and fatty acid profiles in crosses among Bos indicus and Bos taurus finished on pasture or grain. Rev Meat Science 93:98-104.
FUERST-WALTL, B.; FUERST, C. 2012. Effect of inbreeding depression on survival of Austrian Brown Swiss calves and heifers. Rev J. Dairy Sci 95:6086- 6092.
FESSEHAYE, Y.; BOVENHUIS, H.; REZK, M.A.; CROOIJMANS, R.P.M.A.; ARENDONK, J.A.M; KOMEN, J. 2009. Effects of relatedness and inbreeding on reproductive success of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Rev Aquaculture 294:180-186.
NOTTER, D.R. 2013. Breeding of animals. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. 2.ed. Oxforfd, UK.
PEIXOTO, M.G.C.D.; POGGIAN, C.F.; VERNEQUE, R.S.; EGITO, A.A.; CARVALHO, V.M.; PENNA, J.A.G.; BERGMANN, J.A.G.; VICCINI, L.F.; MACHADO, M.A. 2010. Genetic basis and inbreeding in the Brazilian Guzerat (Bos indicus) subpopulation selected for milk production. Rev Livestock Science 131:168-174.
DARWIN, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life.
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREV
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
RALLS, K.; FRANKHAM, R.; BALLOU, J. 2013. Inbreeding and Outbreeding. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity 2. Ed. Oxford, UK. RYE, M.; MAO, I.L. 1998. Nonadditive genetic effects and inbreeding depression for body weight in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Rev Livestock Production Science 57:15-22.
WALLING, C.A.; NUSSEY, D.H.; MORRIS, A.; CLUTTON-BROCK, A.M.; LOESKE, E.K.; PEMBERTON, J.M. 2011. Inbreeding depression in red deer calves. Rev BMC Evolutionary Biology 11:318.
VAN WYK, J.B.; FAIR, M.D.; CLOETE, S.W.P. 2009. Case study: The effect of inbreeding on the production and reproduction traits in the Elsenburg Dormer sheep stud. Rev Livestock Science120:218-224.
SZULKIN, M.; STOPHER, K.V.; PEMBERTON, J.M. 2012. Inbreeding avoidance, tolerance, or preference in animals?. Rev Trends Ecol Evol. In press.
SMITH, C.; QUINTON, M. 1993. The Effect of selection in sublines and crossing on genetic response and inbreeding. Rev Journal of Animal Science 71:2631-2638.
SANTANA, M.L.; OLIVERA, P.S.; PEDROSA, V.B.; ELER, J.P.; GROENEVELD, E.; FERRAZ, J.B.S. 2010. Effect of inbreeding on growth and reproductive traits of Nellore cattle in Brazil. Rev Livestock Science 131:212-217.
SANTANA, M.L.; ASPILCUETA-BORQUIS, R.R.; BIGNARDI, A.B.; et al. 2011. Population structure and effects of inbreeding on milk yield and quality of Murrah buffaloes. Rev J. Dairy Sci 94:5204-5211.
SÁNCHEZ, J.E. 2013. Consanguinidad: Costo oculto para la ganadería de leche. Rev Selecta 1:11-14.
ROKOUEI, M.; TORSHIZI, R.V.; SHAHRBABAK, M.M.; SARGOLZAEI, M.; SORENSEN, A.C. 2010. Monitoring inbreeding trends and inbreeding depression for economically important traits of Holstein cattle in Iran. Rev J. Dairy Sci 93:3294- 3302.
DIXIT, S.P.; VERMA, N.K.; AGGARWAL, R.A.K.; VYAS, M.K.; RANA, J.; SHARMA, A.; TYAGI, P.; ULMEK, B.R. 2010. Genetic diversity and relationship among southern Indian goat breeds based on microsatellite markers. Rev Small Ruminant Research 91:153-159. ORGANIZACIÓN DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS PARA LA AGRICULTURA-FAO. 2010. La situación de los recursos zoogenéticos mundiales para la alimentación y la agricultura. Roma.
COLTMAN, D.W.; PILKINGTON, J.G.; SMITH, J.A.; PEMBERTON, J.M. 1999. Parasite-mediated selection against inbred Soay sheep in a freeliving, island population. Rev Evolution 53:1259-1267.
CASSELL, B.G. 2009. Inbreeding. Virginia Tech Cooperative Extension. Disponible en: http://pubs.ext.vt.edu/404/404-080/404-080_pdf.pdf. Accesado en: 07/02/2013.
Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA
Se realizó una revisión literaria acerca de las ventajas y desventajas de utilizar la endogamia (cruce de individuos emparentados) directa o indirectamente en los sistemas de producción animal. La endogamia actúa en las poblaciones de animales silvestres y domesticadas reduciendo la variabilidad genética dentro de las poblaciones, disminuyendo la heterocigocidad, y aumentando la probabilidad de heredar a las siguientes generaciones alelos asociados a defectos genéticos, lo que se traduce finalmente en una reducción en la capacidad de adaptación de los animales al medio ambiente y un aumento en el riesgo de extinción. También se ha demostrado que el aumento de la endogamia a menudo se asocia con una reducción en el valor promedio de una o más características de interés económico en la producción animal. Es por esto que en los programas de mejoramiento genético y conservación es de vital importancia tener control sobre la endogamia para mantener la variabilidad genética dentro de las poblaciones animales a través del tiempo.
OCAMPO G., RICARDO
CARDONA C., HENRY
Heterocigocidad
mejoramiento genético
selección
variabilidad genética.
5
2
Núm. 2 , Año 2013 : RECIA 5(2):JULIO-DICIEMBRE
Artículo de revista
application/pdf
Universidad de Sucre
Publication
https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/view/458
ALLENDE, R. 2007. ¿Por qué hacer inseminación artificial? Sitio Argentino de Producción Animal. Disponible en: http://www.produccion-animal.com.ar. Accesado en: 07/02/2013.
CARAVIELLO, D.Z. 2004. Inbreeding in dairy cattle. The Babcock Institute. Disponible en: http://babcock.wisc.edu. Accesado en: 07/02/2013.
BURROW, HM. 1998. The effects of inbreeding on productive and adaptive traits and temperament of tropical beef cattle. Rev Livestock Production Science 55:227- 243.
BRYDEN,C.A.; HEATH, J.W.; HEATH, D.D. 2004. Performance and heterosis in farmed and wild Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) hybrid and purebred crosses. Rev Aquaculture 235:249-261. BULAYEV, O.A.; PAVLOVA, T.A. 2009. The effect of inbreeding on aggregation of complex diseases in genetic isolates. Rev Russian Journal of Genetics 45:961- 968.
BLACKBURN, H.D.; WELSH, C.S. 2010. Inbreeding levels in swine: Ramifications for genetic diversity. The American Livestock Breeds Conservancy 27:5-6.
BIJMA, P.; VAN ARENDONK, J.M.; WOLLIAMS J.A. 2001. Predicting rates of inbreeding for livestock improvement schemes. Rev Journal of Animal Science 79:840-853.
BARRETA, J.; IÑIGUEZ, V.; SAAVEDRA, V.; ROMERO, F.; CALLISAYA, A.M.; ECHALAR, J.; GUTIÉRREZ-GIL, B.; ARRANZ, J.J. 2012. Genetic diversity and population structure of Bolivian alpacas. Rev Small Ruminant Research 105:97- 104. BICHARD, M. 2002. Genetic improvement in dairy cattle an outsiders perspective. Rev Livestock Production Science 75:1-10.
BARCACCIA, G.; FELICETTI, M.; GALLA G.; CAPOMACCIO, S.; CAPPELLI, K.; ALBERTINI, E.; BUTTAZZONI, L.; PIERAMATI, C.; SILVESTRELLI, M.; SUPPLIZI, V. 2013. Molecular analysis of genetic diversity, population structure and inbreeding level of the Italian Lipizzan horse. Rev Livestock Science 151:124-133.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Español
Inbreeding in animal production
We made a literalature review about advantages and disadvantages of using inbreeding (crossing of related individuals) directly or indirectly in animal production. The inbreeding acts in wild and domesticated animal populations reducing genetic variability, decreasing heterozygosity, and increasing the chance to inherit alleles associated with genetic defects, resulting in a reduction of the animal adaptation capacity to the environment and increasing the risk of extinction. Also has been demonstrated that inbreeding increase is associated with the average reduction of one or more economic interest characteristics in animal  production. For this reason in conservation and breeding programs is very important have control over inbreeding to maintain the genetic variability within animal populations over time.
Heterozygosity
animal breeding
selection
genetic variability.
Journal article
https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/458/504
463
2013-07-12T00:00:00Z
2013-07-12T00:00:00Z
2027-4297
https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v5.n2.2013.458
479
10.24188/recia.v5.n2.2013.458
2013-07-12
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE SUCRE
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESUCRE/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA
title La endogamia en la producción animal
spellingShingle La endogamia en la producción animal
OCAMPO G., RICARDO
CARDONA C., HENRY
Heterocigocidad
mejoramiento genético
selección
variabilidad genética.
Heterozygosity
animal breeding
selection
genetic variability.
title_short La endogamia en la producción animal
title_full La endogamia en la producción animal
title_fullStr La endogamia en la producción animal
title_full_unstemmed La endogamia en la producción animal
title_sort la endogamia en la producción animal
title_eng Inbreeding in animal production
description Se realizó una revisión literaria acerca de las ventajas y desventajas de utilizar la endogamia (cruce de individuos emparentados) directa o indirectamente en los sistemas de producción animal. La endogamia actúa en las poblaciones de animales silvestres y domesticadas reduciendo la variabilidad genética dentro de las poblaciones, disminuyendo la heterocigocidad, y aumentando la probabilidad de heredar a las siguientes generaciones alelos asociados a defectos genéticos, lo que se traduce finalmente en una reducción en la capacidad de adaptación de los animales al medio ambiente y un aumento en el riesgo de extinción. También se ha demostrado que el aumento de la endogamia a menudo se asocia con una reducción en el valor promedio de una o más características de interés económico en la producción animal. Es por esto que en los programas de mejoramiento genético y conservación es de vital importancia tener control sobre la endogamia para mantener la variabilidad genética dentro de las poblaciones animales a través del tiempo.
description_eng We made a literalature review about advantages and disadvantages of using inbreeding (crossing of related individuals) directly or indirectly in animal production. The inbreeding acts in wild and domesticated animal populations reducing genetic variability, decreasing heterozygosity, and increasing the chance to inherit alleles associated with genetic defects, resulting in a reduction of the animal adaptation capacity to the environment and increasing the risk of extinction. Also has been demonstrated that inbreeding increase is associated with the average reduction of one or more economic interest characteristics in animal  production. For this reason in conservation and breeding programs is very important have control over inbreeding to maintain the genetic variability within animal populations over time.
author OCAMPO G., RICARDO
CARDONA C., HENRY
author_facet OCAMPO G., RICARDO
CARDONA C., HENRY
topicspa_str_mv Heterocigocidad
mejoramiento genético
selección
variabilidad genética.
topic Heterocigocidad
mejoramiento genético
selección
variabilidad genética.
Heterozygosity
animal breeding
selection
genetic variability.
topic_facet Heterocigocidad
mejoramiento genético
selección
variabilidad genética.
Heterozygosity
animal breeding
selection
genetic variability.
citationvolume 5
citationissue 2
citationedition Núm. 2 , Año 2013 : RECIA 5(2):JULIO-DICIEMBRE
publisher Universidad de Sucre
ispartofjournal Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA
source https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/view/458
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
references HEINS, B.J.; HANSEN, L.B.; SEYKORA, A.J. 2006. Production of pure Holsteins versus crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red. Rev J. Dairy Sci 89:2799-2804. HUBBARD, D.J.; SOUTHWOOD, O.I.; KENNEDY, B.W. 1990. Rates of inbreeding in Yorkshire, Landacre, Duroc, and Hampshire performance tested pigs in Ontario. Rev Canadian Journal of Animal Science 70:401-407.
NORMAN, H.D.; POWELL, R.L.; WRIGHT, J.R.; SATTLER, C.G. 2001. Overview of progeny-test programs of artificial insemination organizations in the United States. Rev J. Dairy Sci 84:1899-1912.
MIGLIOR, F.; BURNSIDE, E. 1995. Genetics and Breeding. Rev J. Dairy Sci 78:1167. NOMURA, T.; HONDA, T.; MUKAI, F. 2001. Inbreeding and effective population size of Japanese black cattle. Rev Journal of Animal Science 79:366-370.
MEUWISSEN, T.H.E. 1997. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Rev Journal of Animal Science 75:934-940.
MATZ, B. 2011. Crossing, grading, and keeping pure: animal breeding and exchange around 1860. Rev Endeavour 35:7-15. MC PARLAND, S.; KEARNEY, J.F.; BERRY, D.P. 2007. Inbreeding effects on milk production, calving performance, fertility, and conformation in Irish Holstein- Friesians. Rev J. Dairy Sci 90:4411-4419.
MARIE, J.; CHARPENTIER, E.; WILLIAMS, C. 2008. Inbreeding depression in ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta): genetic diversity predicts parasitism, immunocompetence, and survivorship. Rev Conservation Genetics 9:1605-1615.
KELLER, L.F. 1994. Selection against inbred song sparrows during a natural population bottleneck. Rev Nature 372:356-357.
KELLER, L.F.; WALLER, D.M. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Rev Trends Ecol Evol 17:230-241.
HEINS, B.J.; HANSEN, L.B.; SEYKORA, A.J. 2006. Fertility and survival of pure Holsteins versus crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red. Rev J. Dairy Sci 89:4944-4951.
NOTTER, D.R. 1999. The Importance of Genetic Diversity in Livestock Populations of the Future. Rev Journal of Animal Science 77:61-69. PEDROSA, V.B.; SANTANA, M.L.; OLIVEIRA, P.S. 2010. Population structure and inbreeding effects on growth traits of Santa Ines sheep in Brazil. Rev Small Ruminant Research 93:135-139.
HAYES, B.J.; LEWIN, H.A.; GODDARD, M.E. 2013. The future of livestock breeding: genomic selection for efficiency, reduced emissions intensity, and adaptation. Rev Trends in Genetics. In press.
HANSEN, L.B. 2006. Monitoring the worldwide genetic supply for cattle with emphasis on managing crossbreeding and inbreeding. En: Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Memorias. Belo Horizonte, Brasil.
GUEST, B. 2008. Consanguinidad en bovinos. Rev Angus 241:54-44. GUITOU, H. 2010. Coeficiente de consanguinidad de un individuo. Sistemas de apareamiento. Rev Angus 248:31-37.
GEROSA, S.; SKOET, J. 2013. Milk Availability: Trends in production and emand and medium-term Outlook. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura. GOYARD, E.; GOARANT, C.; ANSQUER, D.; PIERRE, B.; DE DECKER, S.; DUFOUR, R.; GALINIE, C.; PEIGNON, J.; PHAM, D.; VOUREY, E.; HARACHE, Y.; PATROIS, J. 2008. Cross breeding of different domesticated lines as a simple way for genetic improvement in small aquaculture industries: Heterosis and inbreeding effects on growth and survival rates of the Pacific blue shrimp Penaeus (Litopenaeus) stylirostris). Rev Aquaculture 278:43-50.
GAMA, L.T.; BRESSAN, M.C.; RODRIGUES, E.C.; ROSSATO, L.V.; MOREIRA, O.C.; ALVES, S.P.; BESSA, R.J. 2013. Heterosis for meat quality and fatty acid profiles in crosses among Bos indicus and Bos taurus finished on pasture or grain. Rev Meat Science 93:98-104.
FUERST-WALTL, B.; FUERST, C. 2012. Effect of inbreeding depression on survival of Austrian Brown Swiss calves and heifers. Rev J. Dairy Sci 95:6086- 6092.
FESSEHAYE, Y.; BOVENHUIS, H.; REZK, M.A.; CROOIJMANS, R.P.M.A.; ARENDONK, J.A.M; KOMEN, J. 2009. Effects of relatedness and inbreeding on reproductive success of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Rev Aquaculture 294:180-186.
NOTTER, D.R. 2013. Breeding of animals. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. 2.ed. Oxforfd, UK.
PEIXOTO, M.G.C.D.; POGGIAN, C.F.; VERNEQUE, R.S.; EGITO, A.A.; CARVALHO, V.M.; PENNA, J.A.G.; BERGMANN, J.A.G.; VICCINI, L.F.; MACHADO, M.A. 2010. Genetic basis and inbreeding in the Brazilian Guzerat (Bos indicus) subpopulation selected for milk production. Rev Livestock Science 131:168-174.
DARWIN, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life.
RALLS, K.; FRANKHAM, R.; BALLOU, J. 2013. Inbreeding and Outbreeding. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity 2. Ed. Oxford, UK. RYE, M.; MAO, I.L. 1998. Nonadditive genetic effects and inbreeding depression for body weight in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Rev Livestock Production Science 57:15-22.
WALLING, C.A.; NUSSEY, D.H.; MORRIS, A.; CLUTTON-BROCK, A.M.; LOESKE, E.K.; PEMBERTON, J.M. 2011. Inbreeding depression in red deer calves. Rev BMC Evolutionary Biology 11:318.
VAN WYK, J.B.; FAIR, M.D.; CLOETE, S.W.P. 2009. Case study: The effect of inbreeding on the production and reproduction traits in the Elsenburg Dormer sheep stud. Rev Livestock Science120:218-224.
SZULKIN, M.; STOPHER, K.V.; PEMBERTON, J.M. 2012. Inbreeding avoidance, tolerance, or preference in animals?. Rev Trends Ecol Evol. In press.
SMITH, C.; QUINTON, M. 1993. The Effect of selection in sublines and crossing on genetic response and inbreeding. Rev Journal of Animal Science 71:2631-2638.
SANTANA, M.L.; OLIVERA, P.S.; PEDROSA, V.B.; ELER, J.P.; GROENEVELD, E.; FERRAZ, J.B.S. 2010. Effect of inbreeding on growth and reproductive traits of Nellore cattle in Brazil. Rev Livestock Science 131:212-217.
SANTANA, M.L.; ASPILCUETA-BORQUIS, R.R.; BIGNARDI, A.B.; et al. 2011. Population structure and effects of inbreeding on milk yield and quality of Murrah buffaloes. Rev J. Dairy Sci 94:5204-5211.
SÁNCHEZ, J.E. 2013. Consanguinidad: Costo oculto para la ganadería de leche. Rev Selecta 1:11-14.
ROKOUEI, M.; TORSHIZI, R.V.; SHAHRBABAK, M.M.; SARGOLZAEI, M.; SORENSEN, A.C. 2010. Monitoring inbreeding trends and inbreeding depression for economically important traits of Holstein cattle in Iran. Rev J. Dairy Sci 93:3294- 3302.
DIXIT, S.P.; VERMA, N.K.; AGGARWAL, R.A.K.; VYAS, M.K.; RANA, J.; SHARMA, A.; TYAGI, P.; ULMEK, B.R. 2010. Genetic diversity and relationship among southern Indian goat breeds based on microsatellite markers. Rev Small Ruminant Research 91:153-159. ORGANIZACIÓN DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS PARA LA AGRICULTURA-FAO. 2010. La situación de los recursos zoogenéticos mundiales para la alimentación y la agricultura. Roma.
COLTMAN, D.W.; PILKINGTON, J.G.; SMITH, J.A.; PEMBERTON, J.M. 1999. Parasite-mediated selection against inbred Soay sheep in a freeliving, island population. Rev Evolution 53:1259-1267.
CASSELL, B.G. 2009. Inbreeding. Virginia Tech Cooperative Extension. Disponible en: http://pubs.ext.vt.edu/404/404-080/404-080_pdf.pdf. Accesado en: 07/02/2013.
ALLENDE, R. 2007. ¿Por qué hacer inseminación artificial? Sitio Argentino de Producción Animal. Disponible en: http://www.produccion-animal.com.ar. Accesado en: 07/02/2013.
CARAVIELLO, D.Z. 2004. Inbreeding in dairy cattle. The Babcock Institute. Disponible en: http://babcock.wisc.edu. Accesado en: 07/02/2013.
BURROW, HM. 1998. The effects of inbreeding on productive and adaptive traits and temperament of tropical beef cattle. Rev Livestock Production Science 55:227- 243.
BRYDEN,C.A.; HEATH, J.W.; HEATH, D.D. 2004. Performance and heterosis in farmed and wild Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) hybrid and purebred crosses. Rev Aquaculture 235:249-261. BULAYEV, O.A.; PAVLOVA, T.A. 2009. The effect of inbreeding on aggregation of complex diseases in genetic isolates. Rev Russian Journal of Genetics 45:961- 968.
BLACKBURN, H.D.; WELSH, C.S. 2010. Inbreeding levels in swine: Ramifications for genetic diversity. The American Livestock Breeds Conservancy 27:5-6.
BIJMA, P.; VAN ARENDONK, J.M.; WOLLIAMS J.A. 2001. Predicting rates of inbreeding for livestock improvement schemes. Rev Journal of Animal Science 79:840-853.
BARRETA, J.; IÑIGUEZ, V.; SAAVEDRA, V.; ROMERO, F.; CALLISAYA, A.M.; ECHALAR, J.; GUTIÉRREZ-GIL, B.; ARRANZ, J.J. 2012. Genetic diversity and population structure of Bolivian alpacas. Rev Small Ruminant Research 105:97- 104. BICHARD, M. 2002. Genetic improvement in dairy cattle an outsiders perspective. Rev Livestock Production Science 75:1-10.
BARCACCIA, G.; FELICETTI, M.; GALLA G.; CAPOMACCIO, S.; CAPPELLI, K.; ALBERTINI, E.; BUTTAZZONI, L.; PIERAMATI, C.; SILVESTRELLI, M.; SUPPLIZI, V. 2013. Molecular analysis of genetic diversity, population structure and inbreeding level of the Italian Lipizzan horse. Rev Livestock Science 151:124-133.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2013-07-12
date_accessioned 2013-07-12T00:00:00Z
date_available 2013-07-12T00:00:00Z
url https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/view/458
url_doi https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v5.n2.2013.458
eissn 2027-4297
doi 10.24188/recia.v5.n2.2013.458
citationstartpage 463
citationendpage 479
url2_str_mv https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/458/504
_version_ 1797159537717805056

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares