Un nuevo cuestionario de empatía multidimensional en español para adolescentes tempranos y medios

Un nuevo cuestionario de empatía multidimensional en español para adolescentes tempranos y medios

El objetivo de este estudio fue desarrollar un Cuestionario Multidimensional de Empatía para Adolescentes, desde un modelo de neurociencia social cognitiva, operacionalizando las dimensiones de contagio emocional, autoconciencia, toma de perspectiva, regulación emocional y actitud empática. Para el estudio psicométrico del instrumento participaron 320 jóvenes adolescentes escolarizados, de ambos sexos (125 varones, 195 mujeres), de 13 a 16 años (M = 14.23; DT = .95). Se evaluó el poder discriminativo de los ítems, así como la estructura subyacente del instrumento, su consistencia interna y diferentes evidencias de validez externa, convergente, discriminante y de comparación de grupos. Los resultados indicaron que todos los ítems eran discri... Ver más

Guardado en:

International Journal of Psychological Research

2011-2084

2011-7922

Richaud, María Cristina

Lemos, Viviana

UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA

10.21500/20112084.5030

14

2021-04-30

91

105

Colombia

adolescencia temprana y media

psicometría

evaluación

Empatía multidimensional

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

id 1ad99f46ed206ff5f95b62ea1b17d4c3
record_format ojs
spelling Un nuevo cuestionario de empatía multidimensional en español para adolescentes tempranos y medios
Lemos, V. (2012). Estilos parentales, conducta prosocial y estabilidad emocional en niños en vulnerabilidad social por pobreza. In J. Palomar Lever (Comp.), Estudios de Resiliencia en América Latina (pp. 11-22). Pearson Universidad Iberoamericana-Universidad de Sonora.
Ochsner, K. N., Bunge, S., Gross, J. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002). Rethinking feelings: An fmri study of the cognitive regulation of emotion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 (8), 1215–1229. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902760807212.
Nickerson, A. B., Mele, D., & Princiotta, D. (2008). Attachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions. Journal of School Psychology, 46 (6), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.002.
Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of nonnormal likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x.
Muñiz, J., Fidalgo, A. M., García-Cueto, E., Martínez, R., & Moreno, R. (2005). Item analysis. La Muralla.
Muñiz, J. (1993). Teoría clásica de los tests. Pirámide. Muñiz, J. (1998). La medición de lo psicológico. Psicothema, 10 (1), 1–21.
Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7 (3), 847–862.
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24 (1), 167–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167.
Martínez Arias, R. (2005). Psicometría: Teoría de los test psicológicos y educativos. Síntesis. Martínez-Otero, V. (2011). La empatía en la educación: Estudio de una muestra de alumnos universitarios. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala, 14 (4), 174–190. http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/repi/article/view/28899.
Mado, A., Adorni, R., Zani, A., & Trestianu, L. (2009). Sex differences in the brain response to affective scenes with or without humans. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2374–2388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.030.
López, M., Arán, V., & Richaud de Minzi, M. (2014). Empatía: Desde la percepción automática hasta los procesos controlados. Avances de Psicología Latinoamericana, 32 (1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.12804/apl32.1.2014.03.
Lipps, T. (1903). Empathy, inward imitation, and sense feelings. In E. F. Carritt (Ed.), Philosophies of beauty: From Socrates to Robert Bridges being the sources of aesthetic theory (pp. 252-256) Clarendon Press.
Lietz, A., Gerdes, K., Sun, F., Geiger, M., Wagaman, M., & Segal, E. A. (2011). The Empathy Assessment Index (EAI): A confirmatory factor analysis of a multidimensional model of empathy. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 2 (2), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.5243/jsswr.2011.6.
Lévesque, J., Eugène, F., Joanette, Y., Paquette, V., Mensour, B., & Beaudoin, G. (2003). Neural circuitry underlying voluntary suppression of sadness. Biological Psychiatry, 53 (6), 502–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01817-6.
Lemos, V., Hendrie, K., & Oros, L. (2015). Símpatía y su incidencia en la conducta prosocial en niños de 6 y 7 años. Revista de Psicología, 11 (21), 47–59. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/13675.
Lemos, V. (2009). Evaluación de la eficacia de un programa para promover la conducta prosocial enniños en riesgo social por pobreza. In M. C. Richaud de Minzi & J. E. Moreno (Eds.), Recientes Desarrollos Iberoamericanos en Investigación en Ciencias del Comportamiento (Vol 1) (pp. 137-152). Ediciones CIIPME-CONICET.
Pastor, Á. R. (2004). Diferencias en empatía en función de las variables género y edad. Apuntes de Psicología, 22 (3), 323–339.
Kline, P. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing. Routledge.
Kemp, A., Silbertstein, R., Armstrong, S., & Nathan, P. (2004). Gender differences in the cortical electrophysiological processing of visual emotional stimuli. NeuroImage, 2 (2), 632–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.055.
Katz, M. H. (2006). Multivariable analysis (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811692.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural equation modeling with the simplis command language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29 (4), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010.
Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604.
Hoffmann, D. D. (2000). Visual intelligence: How we create what we see. w.w. Norton & Company. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6 (1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Guzmán Bohórquez, L. D., Giraldo Camacho, M. A., & Duarte Ramos, Y. (2019). Diferencias en los niveles de empatía entre hombres y mujeres: Una revisión bibliográfica [Undergraduate research, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia]. https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12494/15756/1/2019_estudiantes_genero_conducta.pdf.
Gutiérrez San Martín, M., Escartí, A., & Pascual, C. (2011). Relaciones entre empatía, conducta prosocial, agresividad, autoeficacia y responsabilidad personal y social de los escolares. Psicothema, 23 (1), 13–19. http://www.psicothema. com/pdf/3843.pdf.
Groen, Y., Wijers, A., Tucha, O., & Althaus, M. (2012). Are there sex differences in ERPs related to processing empathy-evoke pictures? Neuropsychologia, 51 (1), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.012.
Greenberg, D. M., Warrier, V., Allison, C., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2018). Testing the empathizingsystemizing theory of sex differences and the extreme male brain theory of autism in half a million people. Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, 115 (48), 12152–12157. https://doi.org/10. 1073/pnas.1811032115.
Gorostiaga, A., Balluerka, N., & Soroa, G. (2014). Evaluación de la empatía en el ámbito educativo y su relación con la inteligencia emocional. Revista de Educación, 364, 12–38. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2014-364-253.
Gómez-Tabares, A. S. G., & Narváez Marín, M. N. (2020). Tendencias prosociales y su relación con la empatía y la autoeficacia emocional en adolescents en vulnerabilidad psicosocial. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 29 (2), 125–48. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v29n2.78430.
Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoe, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33 (5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20204.
Otzen, T., & Manterola, C. (2017). Técnicas de muestreo sobreunapoblaciónaestudio. International Journal of Morphology, 35 (1), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000100037.
Pouw, L. B., Rieffe, C., Oosterveld, P., Huskens, B., & Stockmann, L. (2013). Reactive/proactive aggression and affective/cognitive empathy in children with ASD. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34 (4), 1256–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.12.022.
Un nuevo cuestionario de empatía multidimensional en español para adolescentes tempranos y medios
Toussaint, L., & Webb, J. R. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between empathy and forgiveness. The Journal of social psychology, 145 (6), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.6.673-686.
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Zarrett, N., & Eccles, J. (2006). The passage to adulthood: Challenges of late adolescence. New Directions for Youth Development, 111, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.179.
Wölfer, R., Cortina, K., & Baumert, J. (2012). Embeddedness and empathy: How the social network shapes adolescents’ social understanding. Journal of Adolescence, 35 (5), 1295–1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.015.
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representationandconstrainingfunctionofwrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13 (1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5.
Wimmer, H., Hogrefe, G. J., & Perner, J. (1988). Children’s understanding of informational access as source of knowledge. Child Development, 59 (2), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130318.
Vossen, H. G., Piotrowski, J. T., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Development of the adolescent measure of empathy and sympathy (AMES). Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.040.
Ventura-León, J. L., & Caycho-Rodríguez, T. (2017). El coeficiente omega: Un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15 (1), 625–627.
Van Noorden, T. H., Haselager, G. J., Cillessen, A. H., & Bukowski, W. M. (2015). Empathy and involvement in bullying in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44 (3), 637–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0135-6.
Tobari, M. (2003). The development of empathy in adolescence: A multidimensional view. Japanese Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14 (2), 136–148.
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526.
Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. Testing structural equation models, 1, 10–39.
Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual review of psychology, 52, 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.83.
Servera, M., & Cardo, E. (2006). Children Sustained Attention Task (CSAT): Normative, reliability, and validity data. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6 (3), 697–707. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/337/33760311.pdf.
Samper, P. (2014). Diferentes tendencias prosociales: El papel de las emociones. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Psicológica, 6 (2), 177–185. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/71038302.pdf.
Rose, A., & Rudolph, K. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132 (1), 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98.
Richaud de Minzi, M. C. (2015). Informe final proyecto de investigación subsidiado por CONICET. Influencia de la empatía y de los procesos cognitivosemocionales y sociales relacionados, sobre las conductas prosociales y agresivas. PIP N◦ 112201001 00230.
Richaud de Minzi, M. C. (2013). Children’s perception of parental empathy as a precursor of children’s empathy in middle and late childhood. The Journal of Psychology, 147 (6), 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2012.721811.
Richaud de Minzi, M. C. (2008). Evaluación de la empatía en población infantil argentina. Revista de Investigación en Psicología, 11 (1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.15381/rinvp.v11i1.3880.
Richaud, M. C., Mesurado, B., & Minzi, M. P. (2019). Attachment style classification questionnaire for latency age: Psychometrics properties of argentine sample. International Journal of Psychological Research, 12 (2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4058.
Richaud, M. C., & Mesurado, B. (2016). Las emociones positivas y la empatía como promotores de las conductas prosociales e inhibidores de las conductas agresivas. Acción Psicológica, 13 (2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.13.2.17808.
Richaud, M. C., Lemos, V. N., Mesurado, B., & Oros, L. (2017). Construct validity and reliability of a new spanish empathy questionnaire for children and early adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 979. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00979.
Rameson, L. T., & Lieberman, M. D. (2009). Empathy: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3 (1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00154.x.
Proverbio, A. M. (2017). Sex differences in social cognition: The case of face processing. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95, 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23817.
Preston, S. D., & De Waal, F. B. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25 (1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000018.
Gerdes, K., & Segal, E. (2009). A social work model of empathy. Advances in Social Work, 10 (2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.18060/235.
Gallese, V. (2001). The ’shared manifol’ hypothesis. from mirror neurons to empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8 (5–7), 33–50. Garaigordobil, M., & De Galdeano, P. G. (2006). Empatía en niños de 10 a 12 años. Psicothema, 18 (2), 180–186. http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/3195.pdf.
Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron, 50 (4), 531–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.001.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Bandalos, D., & Finney, S. (2010). Factor Analysis: Exploratory and Confirmatory. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.),The Reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods(pp. 98-122). Routledge.
Balabanian, C., & Lemos, V. N. (2018). Desarrollo y estudio psicométrico de una escala para evaluar conducta prosocial en adolescentes. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica (RIDEP), 48 (3), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP48.3.15.
Baca, P. R. (2016). Propiedades psicométricas del test de empatía cognitiva y afectiva en estudiantes no universitarios. Cátedra Villarreal-Psicología, 1 (1), 99–116. http://revistas.unfv.edu.pe/index.php/RCV/article/view/127/123.
Ato, M., López-García, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29 (3), 1038–1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511.
Ang, R. P., & Goh, D. H. (2010). Cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 41, 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-010-0176-3.
American Psychological Association. (2010). American Psychological Association ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychological Association. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx.
Allemand, M., Steiger, A. E., & Fend, H. A. (2015). Empathy development in adolescence predicts social competencies in adulthood. Journal of personality, 83 (2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12098.
Akaike, H. (1987). Factor Analysis and AIC. In E. Parzen, K. Tanabe, G. & Kitagawa (Eds.), Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. Springer Series in Statistics (Perspectives in Statistics) (pp. 371-386) Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_29.
Espelage, D. L., & Holt, M. K. (2001). Bullying and victimization during early adolescence: Peer influences and psychosocial correlates. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2 (2–3), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1300/J135v02n02_08.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Bianchin, M., & Angrilli, A. (2012). Gender differences in emotional responses: A psychological study. Physiology & Behavior, 105 (4), 925–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.10.031.
Español
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/5030
application/pdf
Artículo de revista
adolescencia temprana y media
psicometría
evaluación
Empatía multidimensional
El objetivo de este estudio fue desarrollar un Cuestionario Multidimensional de Empatía para Adolescentes, desde un modelo de neurociencia social cognitiva, operacionalizando las dimensiones de contagio emocional, autoconciencia, toma de perspectiva, regulación emocional y actitud empática. Para el estudio psicométrico del instrumento participaron 320 jóvenes adolescentes escolarizados, de ambos sexos (125 varones, 195 mujeres), de 13 a 16 años (M = 14.23; DT = .95). Se evaluó el poder discriminativo de los ítems, así como la estructura subyacente del instrumento, su consistencia interna y diferentes evidencias de validez externa, convergente, discriminante y de comparación de grupos. Los resultados indicaron que todos los ítems eran discriminativos. Los índices de ajuste del análisis factorial confirmatorio permitieron confirmar la estructura pentafactorial de la escala, compuesta por 15 ítems. Los índices de consistencia interna de las diferentes dimensiones estuvieron entre moderados y adecuados. Asimismo, se analizaron diferencias en la empatía entre hombres y mujeres, cuyos resultados indicaron diferencias a favor de las mujeres. Las diferentes evidencias de validez recopiladas fueron consistentes con lo esperado teóricamente. De esta forma se puede concluir que este Cuestionario Multidimensional de Empatía para Adolescentes (CMEA) es una medida válida y confiable para la evaluación de la empatía en adolescentes.
Batanova, M., & Loukas, A. (2014). Unique and interactive effects of empathy, family, and school factors on early adolescents’ aggression. Journal of youth and adolescence, 43 (11), 1890–1902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0051-1.
Publication
Blair, R. J. R. (1995). A cognitive developmental approach to morality: Investigating the psychopath. Cognition, 57 (1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00676-P.
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10 (85), 1–17. https://www.uv.es/friasnav/Davis_1980.pdf.
Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., & Koller, S. (2001). Brazilian adolescents’ prosocial moral judgment and behavior: Relations to sympathy, perspective taking, genderrole orientation, and demographic characteristics. Child Development, 72 (2), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00294.
Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94 (1), 100–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.100.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Handbook of child psychology. John Wiley & Sons.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R., Guthries, I., & Reiser, M. (2000). Dispositional Emotionality and Regulation: their Role in Predicting Quality of Social Functioning. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (1), 136–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.136.
Dodge, K. A., Lochman, J. E., Harnish, J. D., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (1997). Reactive and proactive aggression in school children and psychiatrically impaired chronically assaultive youth. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106 (1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.106.1.37.
Decety, J., & Svetlova, M. (2012). Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2 (1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.003.
Blakemore, S. J., & Mills, K. L. (2014). Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115202.
Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2006). Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. The Scientific World Journal, 6, Article 280363. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.221.
Decety, J., & Jackson, H. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioural and Cognitive Neuroscience Review, 3 (2), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187.
Decety, J., & Moriguchi, Y. (2007). The empathic brain and its dysfunction in psychiatric populations: Implications for intervention across different clinical conditions. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 1, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0759-1-22.
Davis, H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 (1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113.
Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., & Knight, G. P. (1992). An objective measure of adolescents’ prosocial moral reasoning. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2 (4), 331–349. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1993-15896-001.
Carlo, G., Koller, S. H., Eisenberg, N., Da Silva, M. S., & Frohlich, C. B. (1996). A cross-national study on the relations among prosocial moral reason ing, gender role orientations, and prosocial behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 32 (2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.2.231.
Caprara, G. V., Steca, P., Zelli, A., & Capanna, C. (2005). A new scale for measuring adults’ prosocialness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21 (2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.77.
Bryant, B. K. (1982). An index of empathy for children and adolescents. Child Development, 53 (2), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128984.
Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. E. (2010). Feelings or cognitions? Moral cognitions and emotions as longitudinal predictors of prosocialandaggressivebehaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 48 (8), 872–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.010.
Caravita, S. C., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18 (1), 140–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00465.x.
Carlo, G., Raffaelli, M., Laible, D. J., & Meyer, K. A. (1999). Why are girls less physically aggressive than boys? personality and parenting mediators of physical aggression. Sex Roles, 40 (9–10), 711–729. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018856601513.
Broidy, L., Cauffman, E., Espelage, D. L., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (2003). Sex differences in empathy and its relation to juvenile offending. Violence and Victims, 18 (5), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.2003.18.5.503.
Cichosz, P. (2014). Data mining algorithms: explained using R. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118950951.
Richaud, María Cristina
Lemos, Viviana
Evaluation
Psychometry
Early and Middle Adolescence
The aim of this study was to develop a Multidimensional Questionnaire of Empathy for Adolescents, since a model of cognitive social neuroscience, operationalizing the dimensions of emotional contagion, self-awareness, perspective-taking, emotional regulation, and empathic attitude. For the psychometric study of the instrument, 320 young adolescents in school participated, from both genders (125 male, 195 female), aged 13 to 16 (M = 14.23; SD = .95). The discriminant power of the items was evaluated, as well as the underlying structure of the instrument, its internal consistency, and different evidences of external, convergent, discriminant, and group-comparison validity. The results indicated that all the items were discriminative. The adjustment indexes of confirmatory factorial analysis allowed confirming the pentafactorial structure of the scale, consisting of 15 items. The internal consistency indexes of the different dimensions were between moderate and adequate. Likewise, differences in empathy between men and women were analyzed, the results of which indicated differences in favor of women. The different collected evidences of validity were consistent with what was expected theoretically. In this way it is possible to conclude that this Multidimensional Empathy Questionnaire for Adolescents (CMEA) is a valid and reliable measure for the evaluation of empathy in adolescents.
Multidimensional Empathy
1
14
Journal article
Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
International Journal of Psychological Research
91
2021-04-30T21:34:25Z
2021-04-30T21:34:25Z
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5030/3880
2021-04-30
2011-2084
2011-7922
10.21500/20112084.5030
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5030
105
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection International Journal of Psychological Research
title Un nuevo cuestionario de empatía multidimensional en español para adolescentes tempranos y medios
spellingShingle Un nuevo cuestionario de empatía multidimensional en español para adolescentes tempranos y medios
Richaud, María Cristina
Lemos, Viviana
adolescencia temprana y media
psicometría
evaluación
Empatía multidimensional
Evaluation
Psychometry
Early and Middle Adolescence
Multidimensional Empathy
title_short Un nuevo cuestionario de empatía multidimensional en español para adolescentes tempranos y medios
title_full Un nuevo cuestionario de empatía multidimensional en español para adolescentes tempranos y medios
title_fullStr Un nuevo cuestionario de empatía multidimensional en español para adolescentes tempranos y medios
title_full_unstemmed Un nuevo cuestionario de empatía multidimensional en español para adolescentes tempranos y medios
title_sort un nuevo cuestionario de empatía multidimensional en español para adolescentes tempranos y medios
description El objetivo de este estudio fue desarrollar un Cuestionario Multidimensional de Empatía para Adolescentes, desde un modelo de neurociencia social cognitiva, operacionalizando las dimensiones de contagio emocional, autoconciencia, toma de perspectiva, regulación emocional y actitud empática. Para el estudio psicométrico del instrumento participaron 320 jóvenes adolescentes escolarizados, de ambos sexos (125 varones, 195 mujeres), de 13 a 16 años (M = 14.23; DT = .95). Se evaluó el poder discriminativo de los ítems, así como la estructura subyacente del instrumento, su consistencia interna y diferentes evidencias de validez externa, convergente, discriminante y de comparación de grupos. Los resultados indicaron que todos los ítems eran discriminativos. Los índices de ajuste del análisis factorial confirmatorio permitieron confirmar la estructura pentafactorial de la escala, compuesta por 15 ítems. Los índices de consistencia interna de las diferentes dimensiones estuvieron entre moderados y adecuados. Asimismo, se analizaron diferencias en la empatía entre hombres y mujeres, cuyos resultados indicaron diferencias a favor de las mujeres. Las diferentes evidencias de validez recopiladas fueron consistentes con lo esperado teóricamente. De esta forma se puede concluir que este Cuestionario Multidimensional de Empatía para Adolescentes (CMEA) es una medida válida y confiable para la evaluación de la empatía en adolescentes.
description_eng The aim of this study was to develop a Multidimensional Questionnaire of Empathy for Adolescents, since a model of cognitive social neuroscience, operationalizing the dimensions of emotional contagion, self-awareness, perspective-taking, emotional regulation, and empathic attitude. For the psychometric study of the instrument, 320 young adolescents in school participated, from both genders (125 male, 195 female), aged 13 to 16 (M = 14.23; SD = .95). The discriminant power of the items was evaluated, as well as the underlying structure of the instrument, its internal consistency, and different evidences of external, convergent, discriminant, and group-comparison validity. The results indicated that all the items were discriminative. The adjustment indexes of confirmatory factorial analysis allowed confirming the pentafactorial structure of the scale, consisting of 15 items. The internal consistency indexes of the different dimensions were between moderate and adequate. Likewise, differences in empathy between men and women were analyzed, the results of which indicated differences in favor of women. The different collected evidences of validity were consistent with what was expected theoretically. In this way it is possible to conclude that this Multidimensional Empathy Questionnaire for Adolescents (CMEA) is a valid and reliable measure for the evaluation of empathy in adolescents.
author Richaud, María Cristina
Lemos, Viviana
author_facet Richaud, María Cristina
Lemos, Viviana
topicspa_str_mv adolescencia temprana y media
psicometría
evaluación
Empatía multidimensional
topic adolescencia temprana y media
psicometría
evaluación
Empatía multidimensional
Evaluation
Psychometry
Early and Middle Adolescence
Multidimensional Empathy
topic_facet adolescencia temprana y media
psicometría
evaluación
Empatía multidimensional
Evaluation
Psychometry
Early and Middle Adolescence
Multidimensional Empathy
citationvolume 14
citationissue 1
publisher Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
ispartofjournal International Journal of Psychological Research
source https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/5030
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
references Lemos, V. (2012). Estilos parentales, conducta prosocial y estabilidad emocional en niños en vulnerabilidad social por pobreza. In J. Palomar Lever (Comp.), Estudios de Resiliencia en América Latina (pp. 11-22). Pearson Universidad Iberoamericana-Universidad de Sonora.
Ochsner, K. N., Bunge, S., Gross, J. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002). Rethinking feelings: An fmri study of the cognitive regulation of emotion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 (8), 1215–1229. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902760807212.
Nickerson, A. B., Mele, D., & Princiotta, D. (2008). Attachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions. Journal of School Psychology, 46 (6), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.002.
Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of nonnormal likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x.
Muñiz, J., Fidalgo, A. M., García-Cueto, E., Martínez, R., & Moreno, R. (2005). Item analysis. La Muralla.
Muñiz, J. (1993). Teoría clásica de los tests. Pirámide. Muñiz, J. (1998). La medición de lo psicológico. Psicothema, 10 (1), 1–21.
Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7 (3), 847–862.
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24 (1), 167–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167.
Martínez Arias, R. (2005). Psicometría: Teoría de los test psicológicos y educativos. Síntesis. Martínez-Otero, V. (2011). La empatía en la educación: Estudio de una muestra de alumnos universitarios. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala, 14 (4), 174–190. http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/repi/article/view/28899.
Mado, A., Adorni, R., Zani, A., & Trestianu, L. (2009). Sex differences in the brain response to affective scenes with or without humans. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2374–2388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.030.
López, M., Arán, V., & Richaud de Minzi, M. (2014). Empatía: Desde la percepción automática hasta los procesos controlados. Avances de Psicología Latinoamericana, 32 (1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.12804/apl32.1.2014.03.
Lipps, T. (1903). Empathy, inward imitation, and sense feelings. In E. F. Carritt (Ed.), Philosophies of beauty: From Socrates to Robert Bridges being the sources of aesthetic theory (pp. 252-256) Clarendon Press.
Lietz, A., Gerdes, K., Sun, F., Geiger, M., Wagaman, M., & Segal, E. A. (2011). The Empathy Assessment Index (EAI): A confirmatory factor analysis of a multidimensional model of empathy. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 2 (2), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.5243/jsswr.2011.6.
Lévesque, J., Eugène, F., Joanette, Y., Paquette, V., Mensour, B., & Beaudoin, G. (2003). Neural circuitry underlying voluntary suppression of sadness. Biological Psychiatry, 53 (6), 502–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01817-6.
Lemos, V., Hendrie, K., & Oros, L. (2015). Símpatía y su incidencia en la conducta prosocial en niños de 6 y 7 años. Revista de Psicología, 11 (21), 47–59. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/13675.
Lemos, V. (2009). Evaluación de la eficacia de un programa para promover la conducta prosocial enniños en riesgo social por pobreza. In M. C. Richaud de Minzi & J. E. Moreno (Eds.), Recientes Desarrollos Iberoamericanos en Investigación en Ciencias del Comportamiento (Vol 1) (pp. 137-152). Ediciones CIIPME-CONICET.
Pastor, Á. R. (2004). Diferencias en empatía en función de las variables género y edad. Apuntes de Psicología, 22 (3), 323–339.
Kline, P. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing. Routledge.
Kemp, A., Silbertstein, R., Armstrong, S., & Nathan, P. (2004). Gender differences in the cortical electrophysiological processing of visual emotional stimuli. NeuroImage, 2 (2), 632–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.055.
Katz, M. H. (2006). Multivariable analysis (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811692.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural equation modeling with the simplis command language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29 (4), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010.
Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604.
Hoffmann, D. D. (2000). Visual intelligence: How we create what we see. w.w. Norton & Company. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6 (1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Guzmán Bohórquez, L. D., Giraldo Camacho, M. A., & Duarte Ramos, Y. (2019). Diferencias en los niveles de empatía entre hombres y mujeres: Una revisión bibliográfica [Undergraduate research, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia]. https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12494/15756/1/2019_estudiantes_genero_conducta.pdf.
Gutiérrez San Martín, M., Escartí, A., & Pascual, C. (2011). Relaciones entre empatía, conducta prosocial, agresividad, autoeficacia y responsabilidad personal y social de los escolares. Psicothema, 23 (1), 13–19. http://www.psicothema. com/pdf/3843.pdf.
Groen, Y., Wijers, A., Tucha, O., & Althaus, M. (2012). Are there sex differences in ERPs related to processing empathy-evoke pictures? Neuropsychologia, 51 (1), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.012.
Greenberg, D. M., Warrier, V., Allison, C., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2018). Testing the empathizingsystemizing theory of sex differences and the extreme male brain theory of autism in half a million people. Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, 115 (48), 12152–12157. https://doi.org/10. 1073/pnas.1811032115.
Gorostiaga, A., Balluerka, N., & Soroa, G. (2014). Evaluación de la empatía en el ámbito educativo y su relación con la inteligencia emocional. Revista de Educación, 364, 12–38. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2014-364-253.
Gómez-Tabares, A. S. G., & Narváez Marín, M. N. (2020). Tendencias prosociales y su relación con la empatía y la autoeficacia emocional en adolescents en vulnerabilidad psicosocial. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 29 (2), 125–48. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v29n2.78430.
Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoe, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33 (5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20204.
Otzen, T., & Manterola, C. (2017). Técnicas de muestreo sobreunapoblaciónaestudio. International Journal of Morphology, 35 (1), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000100037.
Pouw, L. B., Rieffe, C., Oosterveld, P., Huskens, B., & Stockmann, L. (2013). Reactive/proactive aggression and affective/cognitive empathy in children with ASD. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34 (4), 1256–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.12.022.
Toussaint, L., & Webb, J. R. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between empathy and forgiveness. The Journal of social psychology, 145 (6), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.6.673-686.
Zarrett, N., & Eccles, J. (2006). The passage to adulthood: Challenges of late adolescence. New Directions for Youth Development, 111, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.179.
Wölfer, R., Cortina, K., & Baumert, J. (2012). Embeddedness and empathy: How the social network shapes adolescents’ social understanding. Journal of Adolescence, 35 (5), 1295–1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.015.
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representationandconstrainingfunctionofwrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13 (1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5.
Wimmer, H., Hogrefe, G. J., & Perner, J. (1988). Children’s understanding of informational access as source of knowledge. Child Development, 59 (2), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130318.
Vossen, H. G., Piotrowski, J. T., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Development of the adolescent measure of empathy and sympathy (AMES). Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.040.
Ventura-León, J. L., & Caycho-Rodríguez, T. (2017). El coeficiente omega: Un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15 (1), 625–627.
Van Noorden, T. H., Haselager, G. J., Cillessen, A. H., & Bukowski, W. M. (2015). Empathy and involvement in bullying in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44 (3), 637–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0135-6.
Tobari, M. (2003). The development of empathy in adolescence: A multidimensional view. Japanese Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14 (2), 136–148.
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526.
Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. Testing structural equation models, 1, 10–39.
Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual review of psychology, 52, 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.83.
Servera, M., & Cardo, E. (2006). Children Sustained Attention Task (CSAT): Normative, reliability, and validity data. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6 (3), 697–707. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/337/33760311.pdf.
Samper, P. (2014). Diferentes tendencias prosociales: El papel de las emociones. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Psicológica, 6 (2), 177–185. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/71038302.pdf.
Rose, A., & Rudolph, K. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132 (1), 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98.
Richaud de Minzi, M. C. (2015). Informe final proyecto de investigación subsidiado por CONICET. Influencia de la empatía y de los procesos cognitivosemocionales y sociales relacionados, sobre las conductas prosociales y agresivas. PIP N◦ 112201001 00230.
Richaud de Minzi, M. C. (2013). Children’s perception of parental empathy as a precursor of children’s empathy in middle and late childhood. The Journal of Psychology, 147 (6), 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2012.721811.
Richaud de Minzi, M. C. (2008). Evaluación de la empatía en población infantil argentina. Revista de Investigación en Psicología, 11 (1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.15381/rinvp.v11i1.3880.
Richaud, M. C., Mesurado, B., & Minzi, M. P. (2019). Attachment style classification questionnaire for latency age: Psychometrics properties of argentine sample. International Journal of Psychological Research, 12 (2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4058.
Richaud, M. C., & Mesurado, B. (2016). Las emociones positivas y la empatía como promotores de las conductas prosociales e inhibidores de las conductas agresivas. Acción Psicológica, 13 (2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.13.2.17808.
Richaud, M. C., Lemos, V. N., Mesurado, B., & Oros, L. (2017). Construct validity and reliability of a new spanish empathy questionnaire for children and early adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 979. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00979.
Rameson, L. T., & Lieberman, M. D. (2009). Empathy: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3 (1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00154.x.
Proverbio, A. M. (2017). Sex differences in social cognition: The case of face processing. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95, 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23817.
Preston, S. D., & De Waal, F. B. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25 (1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000018.
Gerdes, K., & Segal, E. (2009). A social work model of empathy. Advances in Social Work, 10 (2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.18060/235.
Gallese, V. (2001). The ’shared manifol’ hypothesis. from mirror neurons to empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8 (5–7), 33–50. Garaigordobil, M., & De Galdeano, P. G. (2006). Empatía en niños de 10 a 12 años. Psicothema, 18 (2), 180–186. http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/3195.pdf.
Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron, 50 (4), 531–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.001.
Bandalos, D., & Finney, S. (2010). Factor Analysis: Exploratory and Confirmatory. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.),The Reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods(pp. 98-122). Routledge.
Balabanian, C., & Lemos, V. N. (2018). Desarrollo y estudio psicométrico de una escala para evaluar conducta prosocial en adolescentes. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica (RIDEP), 48 (3), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP48.3.15.
Baca, P. R. (2016). Propiedades psicométricas del test de empatía cognitiva y afectiva en estudiantes no universitarios. Cátedra Villarreal-Psicología, 1 (1), 99–116. http://revistas.unfv.edu.pe/index.php/RCV/article/view/127/123.
Ato, M., López-García, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29 (3), 1038–1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511.
Ang, R. P., & Goh, D. H. (2010). Cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 41, 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-010-0176-3.
American Psychological Association. (2010). American Psychological Association ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychological Association. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx.
Allemand, M., Steiger, A. E., & Fend, H. A. (2015). Empathy development in adolescence predicts social competencies in adulthood. Journal of personality, 83 (2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12098.
Akaike, H. (1987). Factor Analysis and AIC. In E. Parzen, K. Tanabe, G. & Kitagawa (Eds.), Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. Springer Series in Statistics (Perspectives in Statistics) (pp. 371-386) Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_29.
Espelage, D. L., & Holt, M. K. (2001). Bullying and victimization during early adolescence: Peer influences and psychosocial correlates. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2 (2–3), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1300/J135v02n02_08.
Bianchin, M., & Angrilli, A. (2012). Gender differences in emotional responses: A psychological study. Physiology & Behavior, 105 (4), 925–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.10.031.
Batanova, M., & Loukas, A. (2014). Unique and interactive effects of empathy, family, and school factors on early adolescents’ aggression. Journal of youth and adolescence, 43 (11), 1890–1902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0051-1.
Blair, R. J. R. (1995). A cognitive developmental approach to morality: Investigating the psychopath. Cognition, 57 (1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00676-P.
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10 (85), 1–17. https://www.uv.es/friasnav/Davis_1980.pdf.
Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., & Koller, S. (2001). Brazilian adolescents’ prosocial moral judgment and behavior: Relations to sympathy, perspective taking, genderrole orientation, and demographic characteristics. Child Development, 72 (2), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00294.
Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94 (1), 100–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.100.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Handbook of child psychology. John Wiley & Sons.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R., Guthries, I., & Reiser, M. (2000). Dispositional Emotionality and Regulation: their Role in Predicting Quality of Social Functioning. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (1), 136–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.136.
Dodge, K. A., Lochman, J. E., Harnish, J. D., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (1997). Reactive and proactive aggression in school children and psychiatrically impaired chronically assaultive youth. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106 (1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.106.1.37.
Decety, J., & Svetlova, M. (2012). Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2 (1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.003.
Blakemore, S. J., & Mills, K. L. (2014). Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115202.
Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2006). Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. The Scientific World Journal, 6, Article 280363. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.221.
Decety, J., & Jackson, H. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioural and Cognitive Neuroscience Review, 3 (2), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187.
Decety, J., & Moriguchi, Y. (2007). The empathic brain and its dysfunction in psychiatric populations: Implications for intervention across different clinical conditions. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 1, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0759-1-22.
Davis, H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 (1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113.
Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., & Knight, G. P. (1992). An objective measure of adolescents’ prosocial moral reasoning. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2 (4), 331–349. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1993-15896-001.
Carlo, G., Koller, S. H., Eisenberg, N., Da Silva, M. S., & Frohlich, C. B. (1996). A cross-national study on the relations among prosocial moral reason ing, gender role orientations, and prosocial behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 32 (2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.2.231.
Caprara, G. V., Steca, P., Zelli, A., & Capanna, C. (2005). A new scale for measuring adults’ prosocialness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21 (2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.77.
Bryant, B. K. (1982). An index of empathy for children and adolescents. Child Development, 53 (2), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128984.
Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. E. (2010). Feelings or cognitions? Moral cognitions and emotions as longitudinal predictors of prosocialandaggressivebehaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 48 (8), 872–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.010.
Caravita, S. C., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18 (1), 140–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00465.x.
Carlo, G., Raffaelli, M., Laible, D. J., & Meyer, K. A. (1999). Why are girls less physically aggressive than boys? personality and parenting mediators of physical aggression. Sex Roles, 40 (9–10), 711–729. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018856601513.
Broidy, L., Cauffman, E., Espelage, D. L., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (2003). Sex differences in empathy and its relation to juvenile offending. Violence and Victims, 18 (5), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.2003.18.5.503.
Cichosz, P. (2014). Data mining algorithms: explained using R. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118950951.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2021-04-30
date_accessioned 2021-04-30T21:34:25Z
date_available 2021-04-30T21:34:25Z
url https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/5030
url_doi https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5030
issn 2011-2084
eissn 2011-7922
doi 10.21500/20112084.5030
citationstartpage 91
citationendpage 105
url2_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5030/3880
_version_ 1797376675078471680

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares