Normas internacionales de inversión en procedimientos de arbitraje internacional y tratados de inversión

Normas internacionales de inversión en procedimientos de arbitraje internacional y tratados de inversión

Due to the significant importance of foreign investment in the economic growth of countries, especially developing countries, the purpose of this research is to review the international standards of investment in international arbitration procedures and investment treaties which have been very effective in removing investment barriers, as well as protecting and attracting more foreign investors in host states. The research method used in this research is descriptive-analytical using library resources. The present study, by describing and analyzing concepts and examples and methods of enforcement of international standards of investment in bilateral and multilateral investment treaties as well as the international arbitration procedure, has... Ver más

Guardado en:

Jurídicas

1794-2918

2590-8928

Raisi, Leila

Mahyar, Alireza Ansari

UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS

10.17151/jurid.2018.15.2.2

15

2018-07-01

11

35

Colombia

tratados de inversión

procedimiento de arbitraje internacional

inversión extranjera

normas internacionales

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Jurídicas - 2018

id 172a727b1c223361757c6e6680de510c
record_format ojs
spelling Normas internacionales de inversión en procedimientos de arbitraje internacional y tratados de inversión
tratados de inversión
Artículo de revista
Núm. 2 , Año 2018 : Julio - Diciembre
2
15
Jurídicas
Universidad de Caldas
procedimiento de arbitraje internacional
inversión extranjera
normas internacionales
Raisi, Leila
Mahyar, Alireza Ansari
Due to the significant importance of foreign investment in the economic growth of countries, especially developing countries, the purpose of this research is to review the international standards of investment in international arbitration procedures and investment treaties which have been very effective in removing investment barriers, as well as protecting and attracting more foreign investors in host states. The research method used in this research is descriptive-analytical using library resources. The present study, by describing and analyzing concepts and examples and methods of enforcement of international standards of investment in bilateral and multilateral investment treaties as well as the international arbitration procedure, has concluded that these standards are very flexible and dynamic,and they evolve over time.
Salini Costruttori SpA and Italstrade SpA v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 23 July 2001. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/casedocuments/ita0738.pdf.
Saluka Investments BV (The Netherlands) v The Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 17 March 2006. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf.
PSEG Global Inc. v. Republic of Turk., ICSID Case No. ARB/02/5, Award, 19 Jan. 2007. Retrieved from http://italaw.com/documents/PSEGGlobal-Turkey-Award.pdf.
Swisslion Doo Skopje v. Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/16, Award, 6 July, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1080.pdf.
Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24, Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 Feb 2005. Retrieved from ttp://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0669.pdf
Phoenix Action, Ltd. V Czech Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/5, Award, 15 Apr. 2009. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0668.pdf.
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. Ecuador, UNCITRAL, Award, 1 July 2004, Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf.
Noble Ventures, Inc. v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/11, Award, 12 Sep. 2005. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0565.pdf.
Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, UNCITRAL, Final Award, 3 August 2005. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case- documents/ita0529.pdf.
Ronald S. Lauder v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Award, 3 September 2001. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0451.pdf. S.D. Myers Inc. v. Canada, UNCITRAL, First Partial Award, 13 November 2000. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0747.pdf
Biwater Gauff v. The Republic of Tanzania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf.
Marvin Roy Feldman Karpa v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/1, Award, 16 December 2002. Retrieved from www.italaw.com/documents/feldman_mexico-award-english.pdf
Gami Investments, Inc. v. The Government of the United Mexican States, UNCITRAL, Final Award. 15 Nov 2004. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0353_0.pdf
Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets, L.P. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3, Award, 22 May 2007. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0293.pdf
Emilio Agustín Maffezini v. The Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7, Decision on Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf.
Compania de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal S.A. v Argentine Republic II, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/3, Award, 20 August 2007. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0215.pdf.
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed, S.A. v. The United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/00/2, Award, 29 May 2003. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/documents/Tecnicas_001.pdf.
American Manufacturing & Trading, In c. (AMT) (USA) v. Republic of Zaire, ICSID Case No. ARB/93/1, 21 February 1997. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ ita0028.pdf.
Alex Genin, Eastern Credit Limited, Inc. and A.S. Baltoil v. The Republic of Estonia, ICSID Case No. ARB/99/2, Award, 25 June 2001. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/documents/Genin-Award.pdf
ADF Group Inc. v. United States of America, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case- documents/ita0009.pdf.
Ziegler, A.R. (2008). Most-favored-nation (MFN) treatment. In A. Reinisch (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yannaca-Small, K. (2008). Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Recent Developments. In A. Reinisch (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection. Oxford. Zeitler, H, E. (2010). Full Protection and Security. In S. W. Schill (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Siemens A.G. v The Argentina Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award, 6 February 2007. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/documents/Siemens-Argentina-Award.pdf.
Convention establishing the multilateral investment guarantee agency (MIGA) (1985). Retrieved from https://www.miga.org/Documents/MIGAConventionFebruary2016.pdf.
Ulysseas, Inc v Ecuador, UNCITRAL, Final Award of 12 June 2012. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1019.pdf.
Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its sixty-seventh session (Official Records of the General Assembly, seventieth session, Supplement No. 10 (A/70/10). (2015). Retrieved from http://legal.un.org/ilc/sessions/67/a_70_10_advance_unedited.pdf.
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (FTA). (2004). Article 15.4. Retrieved from https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/agreements/fta/singapore/asset_upload_file708_4036.pdf.
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Retrieved from https://idatd.cepal.org/Normativas/TLCAN/Ingles/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement-NAFTA.pdf.
United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Award, 24 May 2007.Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0885.pdf.
Germany-Pakistan BIT. (1959). Retrieved from athttps://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume457/volume-457-I-6575-English.pdf.
Free Trade Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Chile (2003). Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/trtdocs/en/cl-us/trt_cl_us.pdf.
Free Trade Agreement between the EFTA States and the United Mexican States. (2000). Retrieved from http://www.efta.int/media/documents/legal-texts/free-trade-relations/mexico/EFTA-MexicoFreeTradeAgreement.pdf.
Energy Charter Treaty. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/documents/itre/dv/energy_charter_/energy_charter_en.pdf.
Draft articles on most-favored-nation clauses (ILC Draft), in Yearbook of the international Law Commission, 1978, Vol. II, part two. Retrieved from http://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/english/ilc_1978_v2_p2.pdf.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2012). Fair and Equitable Treatment, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International investment agreements II, New York and Geneva. Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/Docs/unctaddiaeia2011d5_en.pdf
Albania-United Kingdom BIT. (1996). Retrieved from http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/38.
Agreement on Promotion and Protection of Investment in ASEAN, Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/trtdocs/en/asean01/trt_asean01.pdf.
Wena Hotels Limited v Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4, Award, 8 December 2000. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0902.pdf.
Waste Management, Inc. v. United Mexican States (“Number 2”), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/3, Final Award, 30 April 2004. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/documents/laudo_ingles.pdf.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2011). Scope and Definition, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International investment agreements II, New York and Geneva. Retrieved from unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20102_en.pdf. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2010). Most-Favored-Nation, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, New York and Geneva. Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20101_en.pdf.
Salacuse, J.W. (2015). The Law of Investment Treaties. Oxford International Law Library.
Tudor, L. (2008). The FET in International Investment Agreements: A Typology of Drafting Formulations. In L. Tudor (ed.), The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Foreign Investment Law. UK, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Inglés
Choukroune, L. (2014). National treatment in international investment law and arbitration: A relative standard for autonomous public regulation and sovereign development. In A. Kamperman Sanders (ed.), The Principle of National Treatment in International Economic Law: Trade, Investment and Intellectual Property, Cheltenham. UK: Edward Elgar publishing.
Bronfman, M.K. (2006). Fair and Equitable Treatment — An Evolving Standard. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 10. Retrieved from http://www.mpil.de/files/pdf3/mpunyb_15_marcela_iii. pdf.
Titi, C. (2016). Most-Favored-Nation Treatment: Survival Clauses and Reform of International Investment Law. Journal of International Arbitration, 33 (5). Retrieved from http://www.kluwerlawonline.com.sci-hub.cc/document.php?id=JOIA2016034.
Angelet, N. (2011). Fair and Equitable Treatment. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law [MPEPIL]. Retrieved from http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law9780199231690-e2055?prd=EPIL.
Aisbett, E., Karp, L. & McAusland, C. (2010). Compensation for Indirect Expropriation in International Investment Agreements: Implications of National Treatment and Rights to Invest. Journal of Globalization and Development, 1 (2). Retrieved from https://are.berkeley.edu/~karp/JrGlob&Dev.pdf
Jurídicas - 2018
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/3151
Collins, D. (2014). National treatment in emerging market investment treaties. In A. Kamperman Sanders (ed.), The Principle of National Treatment in International Economic Law: Trade, Investment and Intellectual Property, Cheltenham. UK: Edward Elgar publishing.
application/pdf
Journal article
investment treaties
international arbitration procedure
foreign investment
international standards
Debido a la importancia significativa de la inversión extranjera en el crecimiento económico de los países, especialmente los países en desarrollo, el propósito de esta investigación es revisar las normas internacionales de inversión en el procedimiento de arbitraje internacional y los tratados de inversión que han sido muy eficaces para eliminar las barreras de inversión así como para proteger y atraer a más inversionistas extranjeros a los Estados anfitriones. El método descriptivo- nalítico fue aplicado en esta investigación utilizando recursos bibliográficos. El presente estudio, al describir y analizar los conceptos, ejemplos y métodos de aplicación de las normas internacionales de inversión en los tratados bilaterales y multilaterales de inversión, así como el procedimiento de arbitraje internacional, ha llegado a la conclusión de que estas normas son muy flexibles y dinámicas, y evolucionan en el tiempo.
Collins, D. (2011). Applying the Full Protection and Security Standard of International Investment Law to Digital Assets. Journal of World Investment and Trade, 12 (2). Retrieved from http://openaccess.city. ac.uk/627/2/ApplyingtheFullProtectionandSecurityStandard.pdf.
Bjorklund, A. K. (2008). National Treatment. In A. Reinisch (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cordero Moss, G. (2008). Full Protection and Security. In A. Reinisch (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection, Oxford.
Kurtz, J. (2010). The Merits and Limits of Comparativism: National Treatment in International Investment Law and the WTO. In S. W. Schill (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law. UK: Oxford University Press.
Thulasidhass, P.R. (2015). Most-Favored-Nation Treatment in International Investment Law: Ascertaining the Limits Through Interpretative Principles. Amsterdam Law Forum, 7 (1). Retrieved from http://amsterdamlawforum.org/article/view/346/512.
Schreuer, Ch. (2010). Full Protection and Security. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 1 (2)
Schreuer Ch. (2013). Investment, international protection. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law [MPEPIL]. Retrieved from http://www.univie.ac.at/intlaw/wordpress/pdf/investments_Int_Protection.pdf.
Schlemmer, E.C. (2008). Investment, Investor, Nationality, and Shareholders. In P. Muchlinski, F. Ortino & Ch. Schreuer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
International standards of investment in international arbitration procedure and investment treaties
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2004). Most Favored Nation Treatment in International Investment Law, OECD publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/WP-2004_2.pdf.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). International Investment Law: Understanding Concepts and Tracking Innovations. OECD publishing. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/daf/inv/internationalinvestmentagreements/40471468.pdf.
De Brabandere, E. (2016). ‘States’ Reassertion of Control Over International Investment Law - (Re) Defining Fair and Equitable Treatment and Indirect Expropriation. In A. Kulick (ed.), Reassertion of Control Over the Investment Treaty Regime. Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2846998
Lowe, V. (2007). Changing Dimensions of International Investment Law. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper, 4. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=970727. Malik, M. (2009). Definition of Investment in International Investment Agreements. Bulletin 1, Best Practice Series, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). Retrieved from http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2009/best_practices_bulletin_1.pdf.
Kläger, R. (2011). Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harb, J.P. (2011). Definition of investments protected by international treaties: an on-going hot debate. Mealey’s International Arbitration Report, 26 (8). Retrieved from http://www.jonesday.com/files/Publication/c24e6d62-3269-4b32-b93d-992f1d5e2e77/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/b4526438-d73b-4bd4-a780-8003fe19feaf/689472.pdf.
Dolzer, R. & Schreuer, Ch. (2012). Principles of International Investment Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dolzer, R. (2014). Fair and Equitable Treatment: Today’s Contours, Santa Clara Journal of international law, 12. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/scujil/vol12/iss1/2/.
Dumberry, P. (2016a). Has the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Become a Rule of Customary International Law?. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. etrieved from http://jids. oxfordjournals.org.sci-hub.cc/content/early/2016/04/01/jnlids.idw002.full.pdf.
Dumberry, P. (2016b). The Practice of States as Evidence of Custom: An Analysis of Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Clauses in States’ Foreign Investment Laws. McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2 (1). Retrieved from http://mjdr-rrdm.ca/law/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/6.-Dumberry-.pdf.
Gaillard, E. (2009). Identify or Define? Reflections on the Evolution of the Concept of Investment in ICSID Practice. In Ch. Binder, U. Kriebaum, A. Reinisch & S. Wittich (eds.), International Investment Law For the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer. UK: Oxford University Press.
Grabowski, A. (2014). The Definition of Investment under the ICSID Convention: A Defense of Salini. Chicago Journal of International Law, 15 (1). Retrieved from http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cjil/vol15/iss1/13.
Publication
2018-07-01
2018-07-01T00:00:00Z
2018-07-01T00:00:00Z
35
1794-2918
2590-8928
11
10.17151/jurid.2018.15.2.2
https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2018.15.2.2
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/download/3151/2999
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Jurídicas
title Normas internacionales de inversión en procedimientos de arbitraje internacional y tratados de inversión
spellingShingle Normas internacionales de inversión en procedimientos de arbitraje internacional y tratados de inversión
Raisi, Leila
Mahyar, Alireza Ansari
tratados de inversión
procedimiento de arbitraje internacional
inversión extranjera
normas internacionales
investment treaties
international arbitration procedure
foreign investment
international standards
title_short Normas internacionales de inversión en procedimientos de arbitraje internacional y tratados de inversión
title_full Normas internacionales de inversión en procedimientos de arbitraje internacional y tratados de inversión
title_fullStr Normas internacionales de inversión en procedimientos de arbitraje internacional y tratados de inversión
title_full_unstemmed Normas internacionales de inversión en procedimientos de arbitraje internacional y tratados de inversión
title_sort normas internacionales de inversión en procedimientos de arbitraje internacional y tratados de inversión
title_eng International standards of investment in international arbitration procedure and investment treaties
description Due to the significant importance of foreign investment in the economic growth of countries, especially developing countries, the purpose of this research is to review the international standards of investment in international arbitration procedures and investment treaties which have been very effective in removing investment barriers, as well as protecting and attracting more foreign investors in host states. The research method used in this research is descriptive-analytical using library resources. The present study, by describing and analyzing concepts and examples and methods of enforcement of international standards of investment in bilateral and multilateral investment treaties as well as the international arbitration procedure, has concluded that these standards are very flexible and dynamic,and they evolve over time.
description_eng Debido a la importancia significativa de la inversión extranjera en el crecimiento económico de los países, especialmente los países en desarrollo, el propósito de esta investigación es revisar las normas internacionales de inversión en el procedimiento de arbitraje internacional y los tratados de inversión que han sido muy eficaces para eliminar las barreras de inversión así como para proteger y atraer a más inversionistas extranjeros a los Estados anfitriones. El método descriptivo- nalítico fue aplicado en esta investigación utilizando recursos bibliográficos. El presente estudio, al describir y analizar los conceptos, ejemplos y métodos de aplicación de las normas internacionales de inversión en los tratados bilaterales y multilaterales de inversión, así como el procedimiento de arbitraje internacional, ha llegado a la conclusión de que estas normas son muy flexibles y dinámicas, y evolucionan en el tiempo.
author Raisi, Leila
Mahyar, Alireza Ansari
author_facet Raisi, Leila
Mahyar, Alireza Ansari
topicspa_str_mv tratados de inversión
procedimiento de arbitraje internacional
inversión extranjera
normas internacionales
topic tratados de inversión
procedimiento de arbitraje internacional
inversión extranjera
normas internacionales
investment treaties
international arbitration procedure
foreign investment
international standards
topic_facet tratados de inversión
procedimiento de arbitraje internacional
inversión extranjera
normas internacionales
investment treaties
international arbitration procedure
foreign investment
international standards
citationvolume 15
citationissue 2
citationedition Núm. 2 , Año 2018 : Julio - Diciembre
publisher Universidad de Caldas
ispartofjournal Jurídicas
source https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/3151
language Inglés
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Jurídicas - 2018
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
references_eng Salini Costruttori SpA and Italstrade SpA v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 23 July 2001. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/casedocuments/ita0738.pdf.
Saluka Investments BV (The Netherlands) v The Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 17 March 2006. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf.
PSEG Global Inc. v. Republic of Turk., ICSID Case No. ARB/02/5, Award, 19 Jan. 2007. Retrieved from http://italaw.com/documents/PSEGGlobal-Turkey-Award.pdf.
Swisslion Doo Skopje v. Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/16, Award, 6 July, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1080.pdf.
Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24, Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 Feb 2005. Retrieved from ttp://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0669.pdf
Phoenix Action, Ltd. V Czech Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/5, Award, 15 Apr. 2009. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0668.pdf.
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. Ecuador, UNCITRAL, Award, 1 July 2004, Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf.
Noble Ventures, Inc. v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/11, Award, 12 Sep. 2005. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0565.pdf.
Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, UNCITRAL, Final Award, 3 August 2005. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case- documents/ita0529.pdf.
Ronald S. Lauder v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Award, 3 September 2001. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0451.pdf. S.D. Myers Inc. v. Canada, UNCITRAL, First Partial Award, 13 November 2000. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0747.pdf
Biwater Gauff v. The Republic of Tanzania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf.
Marvin Roy Feldman Karpa v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/1, Award, 16 December 2002. Retrieved from www.italaw.com/documents/feldman_mexico-award-english.pdf
Gami Investments, Inc. v. The Government of the United Mexican States, UNCITRAL, Final Award. 15 Nov 2004. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0353_0.pdf
Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets, L.P. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3, Award, 22 May 2007. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0293.pdf
Emilio Agustín Maffezini v. The Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7, Decision on Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf.
Compania de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal S.A. v Argentine Republic II, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/3, Award, 20 August 2007. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0215.pdf.
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed, S.A. v. The United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/00/2, Award, 29 May 2003. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/documents/Tecnicas_001.pdf.
American Manufacturing & Trading, In c. (AMT) (USA) v. Republic of Zaire, ICSID Case No. ARB/93/1, 21 February 1997. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ ita0028.pdf.
Alex Genin, Eastern Credit Limited, Inc. and A.S. Baltoil v. The Republic of Estonia, ICSID Case No. ARB/99/2, Award, 25 June 2001. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/documents/Genin-Award.pdf
ADF Group Inc. v. United States of America, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case- documents/ita0009.pdf.
Ziegler, A.R. (2008). Most-favored-nation (MFN) treatment. In A. Reinisch (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yannaca-Small, K. (2008). Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Recent Developments. In A. Reinisch (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection. Oxford. Zeitler, H, E. (2010). Full Protection and Security. In S. W. Schill (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Siemens A.G. v The Argentina Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award, 6 February 2007. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/documents/Siemens-Argentina-Award.pdf.
Convention establishing the multilateral investment guarantee agency (MIGA) (1985). Retrieved from https://www.miga.org/Documents/MIGAConventionFebruary2016.pdf.
Ulysseas, Inc v Ecuador, UNCITRAL, Final Award of 12 June 2012. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1019.pdf.
Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its sixty-seventh session (Official Records of the General Assembly, seventieth session, Supplement No. 10 (A/70/10). (2015). Retrieved from http://legal.un.org/ilc/sessions/67/a_70_10_advance_unedited.pdf.
United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (FTA). (2004). Article 15.4. Retrieved from https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/agreements/fta/singapore/asset_upload_file708_4036.pdf.
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Retrieved from https://idatd.cepal.org/Normativas/TLCAN/Ingles/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement-NAFTA.pdf.
United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Award, 24 May 2007.Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0885.pdf.
Germany-Pakistan BIT. (1959). Retrieved from athttps://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume457/volume-457-I-6575-English.pdf.
Free Trade Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Chile (2003). Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/trtdocs/en/cl-us/trt_cl_us.pdf.
Free Trade Agreement between the EFTA States and the United Mexican States. (2000). Retrieved from http://www.efta.int/media/documents/legal-texts/free-trade-relations/mexico/EFTA-MexicoFreeTradeAgreement.pdf.
Energy Charter Treaty. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/documents/itre/dv/energy_charter_/energy_charter_en.pdf.
Draft articles on most-favored-nation clauses (ILC Draft), in Yearbook of the international Law Commission, 1978, Vol. II, part two. Retrieved from http://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/english/ilc_1978_v2_p2.pdf.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2012). Fair and Equitable Treatment, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International investment agreements II, New York and Geneva. Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/Docs/unctaddiaeia2011d5_en.pdf
Albania-United Kingdom BIT. (1996). Retrieved from http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/38.
Agreement on Promotion and Protection of Investment in ASEAN, Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/trtdocs/en/asean01/trt_asean01.pdf.
Wena Hotels Limited v Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4, Award, 8 December 2000. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0902.pdf.
Waste Management, Inc. v. United Mexican States (“Number 2”), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/3, Final Award, 30 April 2004. Retrieved from http://www.italaw.com/documents/laudo_ingles.pdf.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2011). Scope and Definition, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International investment agreements II, New York and Geneva. Retrieved from unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20102_en.pdf. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2010). Most-Favored-Nation, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, New York and Geneva. Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20101_en.pdf.
Salacuse, J.W. (2015). The Law of Investment Treaties. Oxford International Law Library.
Tudor, L. (2008). The FET in International Investment Agreements: A Typology of Drafting Formulations. In L. Tudor (ed.), The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Foreign Investment Law. UK, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Choukroune, L. (2014). National treatment in international investment law and arbitration: A relative standard for autonomous public regulation and sovereign development. In A. Kamperman Sanders (ed.), The Principle of National Treatment in International Economic Law: Trade, Investment and Intellectual Property, Cheltenham. UK: Edward Elgar publishing.
Bronfman, M.K. (2006). Fair and Equitable Treatment — An Evolving Standard. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 10. Retrieved from http://www.mpil.de/files/pdf3/mpunyb_15_marcela_iii. pdf.
Titi, C. (2016). Most-Favored-Nation Treatment: Survival Clauses and Reform of International Investment Law. Journal of International Arbitration, 33 (5). Retrieved from http://www.kluwerlawonline.com.sci-hub.cc/document.php?id=JOIA2016034.
Angelet, N. (2011). Fair and Equitable Treatment. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law [MPEPIL]. Retrieved from http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law9780199231690-e2055?prd=EPIL.
Aisbett, E., Karp, L. & McAusland, C. (2010). Compensation for Indirect Expropriation in International Investment Agreements: Implications of National Treatment and Rights to Invest. Journal of Globalization and Development, 1 (2). Retrieved from https://are.berkeley.edu/~karp/JrGlob&Dev.pdf
Collins, D. (2014). National treatment in emerging market investment treaties. In A. Kamperman Sanders (ed.), The Principle of National Treatment in International Economic Law: Trade, Investment and Intellectual Property, Cheltenham. UK: Edward Elgar publishing.
Collins, D. (2011). Applying the Full Protection and Security Standard of International Investment Law to Digital Assets. Journal of World Investment and Trade, 12 (2). Retrieved from http://openaccess.city. ac.uk/627/2/ApplyingtheFullProtectionandSecurityStandard.pdf.
Bjorklund, A. K. (2008). National Treatment. In A. Reinisch (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cordero Moss, G. (2008). Full Protection and Security. In A. Reinisch (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection, Oxford.
Kurtz, J. (2010). The Merits and Limits of Comparativism: National Treatment in International Investment Law and the WTO. In S. W. Schill (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law. UK: Oxford University Press.
Thulasidhass, P.R. (2015). Most-Favored-Nation Treatment in International Investment Law: Ascertaining the Limits Through Interpretative Principles. Amsterdam Law Forum, 7 (1). Retrieved from http://amsterdamlawforum.org/article/view/346/512.
Schreuer, Ch. (2010). Full Protection and Security. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 1 (2)
Schreuer Ch. (2013). Investment, international protection. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law [MPEPIL]. Retrieved from http://www.univie.ac.at/intlaw/wordpress/pdf/investments_Int_Protection.pdf.
Schlemmer, E.C. (2008). Investment, Investor, Nationality, and Shareholders. In P. Muchlinski, F. Ortino & Ch. Schreuer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2004). Most Favored Nation Treatment in International Investment Law, OECD publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/WP-2004_2.pdf.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). International Investment Law: Understanding Concepts and Tracking Innovations. OECD publishing. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/daf/inv/internationalinvestmentagreements/40471468.pdf.
De Brabandere, E. (2016). ‘States’ Reassertion of Control Over International Investment Law - (Re) Defining Fair and Equitable Treatment and Indirect Expropriation. In A. Kulick (ed.), Reassertion of Control Over the Investment Treaty Regime. Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2846998
Lowe, V. (2007). Changing Dimensions of International Investment Law. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper, 4. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=970727. Malik, M. (2009). Definition of Investment in International Investment Agreements. Bulletin 1, Best Practice Series, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). Retrieved from http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2009/best_practices_bulletin_1.pdf.
Kläger, R. (2011). Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harb, J.P. (2011). Definition of investments protected by international treaties: an on-going hot debate. Mealey’s International Arbitration Report, 26 (8). Retrieved from http://www.jonesday.com/files/Publication/c24e6d62-3269-4b32-b93d-992f1d5e2e77/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/b4526438-d73b-4bd4-a780-8003fe19feaf/689472.pdf.
Dolzer, R. & Schreuer, Ch. (2012). Principles of International Investment Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dolzer, R. (2014). Fair and Equitable Treatment: Today’s Contours, Santa Clara Journal of international law, 12. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/scujil/vol12/iss1/2/.
Dumberry, P. (2016a). Has the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Become a Rule of Customary International Law?. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. etrieved from http://jids. oxfordjournals.org.sci-hub.cc/content/early/2016/04/01/jnlids.idw002.full.pdf.
Dumberry, P. (2016b). The Practice of States as Evidence of Custom: An Analysis of Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Clauses in States’ Foreign Investment Laws. McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2 (1). Retrieved from http://mjdr-rrdm.ca/law/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/6.-Dumberry-.pdf.
Gaillard, E. (2009). Identify or Define? Reflections on the Evolution of the Concept of Investment in ICSID Practice. In Ch. Binder, U. Kriebaum, A. Reinisch & S. Wittich (eds.), International Investment Law For the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer. UK: Oxford University Press.
Grabowski, A. (2014). The Definition of Investment under the ICSID Convention: A Defense of Salini. Chicago Journal of International Law, 15 (1). Retrieved from http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cjil/vol15/iss1/13.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2018-07-01
date_accessioned 2018-07-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2018-07-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/3151
url_doi https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2018.15.2.2
issn 1794-2918
eissn 2590-8928
doi 10.17151/jurid.2018.15.2.2
citationstartpage 11
citationendpage 35
url2_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/download/3151/2999
_version_ 1797157988375461888

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares