Efectos de la experiencia social temprana en las preferencias sexuales de la codorniz japonesa (coturnix japonica).

Efectos de la experiencia social temprana en las preferencias sexuales de la codorniz japonesa (coturnix japonica).

Las teorías clásicas propuestas para explicar las preferencias sexuales han hecho énfasis en los determinantes genéticos; consideran que las preferencias de las hembras y los rasgos sexuales de los machos coevolucionan, porque los rasgos son un indicador confiable de “buenos genes” que favorecen la supervivencia de los hijos. Una hipótesis alternativa explica las preferencias sexuales mediante un mecanismo de aprendizaje; un ejemplo de este enfoque es el aprendizaje por impronta propuesto por Konrad Lorenz. El presente experimento se propuso evaluar los efectos de diferentes prácticas de crianza temprana sobre las preferencias de pareja. Para este propósito, se seleccionaron 35 pollitos de codorniz, de 15 días de nacidos, y se dividieron en... Ver más

Guardado en:

Acta Colombiana de Psicología

0123-9155

1909-9711

Gutierrez, Germán

Pérez Manrique, Tiberio

UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA

9

2006-07-01

57

73

Colombia

Impronta

Selección sexual

Preferencias sexuales

Experiencia social

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Tiberio Pérez Manrique, Germán Gutierrez - 2006

id 14d9cb242638cc808da8a74378db74fc
record_format ojs
spelling Efectos de la experiencia social temprana en las preferencias sexuales de la codorniz japonesa (coturnix japonica).
Johnson, W. A. & Tiefer, L. (1972). Sexual preferences in neonatally castrated golden hamsters. Hormones and Behavior, 9, 213-218.
Persaud, K. & Galef, B. G., Jr. (2003). Female Japanese quail aggregate to avoid sexual harassment by conspecific males: A possible cause of conspecific cueing. Animal Behaviour, 65, 89-94.
Premack, D. (1965). Reinforcement Theory. En D. Levine (Dir.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.(Vol. 13 pp. 123-1809. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Pfaus, J. G. (1996). Frank A. Beach Award - Homologies of animal and human sexual behaviors. Hormones and Behavior, 30, 187-200.
Pavlov, I. P. (1997). Los reflejos condicionados (A. Gallardo, trad.). Madrid, España: Morata. (Trabajo original publicado en 1927).
Owens, I. P. F., Rowe, C. & Thomas, A. L. R. (1999). Sexual selection, speciation and imprinting: separating the sheep from the goats. Tree, 14, 131-132.
Nosofky, R. M. (1991). Test of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptual Performance, 17, 3-27.
Meyerson, B. J. & Lindström, L. H. (1973). Sexual motivation in the female rat: A methodological study applied to the effect of estradiol benzoate. Acta Physiology. Scand. Supplement. 389, 1-80.
McGregor, P. K. & Peake, T. (2000). Communication networks: Social environments for receiving and signaling behaviour. Acta Ethologica, 2, 71-81.
McBride, T. C. & Lickliter, R. (1993). Social experience with siblings fosters species -specific responsiveness to maternal visual cues in Bobwhite Quail Chicks (Colinus virginianus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107, 320-327.
Llinás, R. (2003). El cerebro y el mito del yo. El papel de las neuronas en el pensamiento y el comportamiento humano. Bogotá: Norma.
Lorenz, K. Z (1935). Der kumpan in der Umweld des Vogels; die Artenosse als auslosende Moment Sozialer Verhaltungswiesen. Journal Fur Ornithologie. 83, 137-214.
Irwin, D. E. & Price, T. (1999). Sexual imprinting learning and speciation. Heredity, 82, 347-354.
Price, T. (1998). Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Philosophical. Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B. 353, 251-260.
Hutchison, J. R., & Hutchison, R. E. (1983). Hormonal mechanisms of mate choice in birds. En P. Bateson (Ed.), Mate choice, pp. 389-406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hollis, K. L., Ten Cate, C. & Bateson, P. P. G. (1991). Stimulus representation: subprocess of imprinting and conditioning. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 105, 307-317.
Hollis, K. L. (1997). Contemporary research on Pavlonian condi tioning: a “new” functional analysis. American Psychologist, 52, 956-965.
Hollis, K. L. (1990). The role of Pavlovian conditioning in territorial aggression and reproduction. En D. Dewsbury (Ed.), Contemporary Issues in Comparative Psychology. pp. 197-219. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Hollis, K. L. (1982). Pavlovian conditioning of signal-centered action patterns and autonomic behavior: a biological analysis of function. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 12, 1-64.
Hess, E. H. (1959). The relationship between imprinting and motivation. En M. R. Jones. (dir), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior. Nueva York: Wiley.
Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science, 4570 (218), 384-387.
Gutierrez, G. & Domjan, M. (1997). Differences in the sexual conditioned behavior of male and female Japanese quail (Cutornix Japonica). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 135-142.
Gutierrez, G. & Domjan, M. (1996). Learning and male-male sexual competition in Japanese quail (Cutornix Japonica). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110, 170-175.
Gunther, L. M., Miller, R. R. & Matute, H. (1997). CSs and USs: What’s the difference? Journal Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 15-30.
Gibson, E. J. (1991). An odyssey in learning and perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pilastro, A., Benetton, S., & Bisazza, A. (2003). Female aggregation and male competition reduce costs of sexual harassment in the mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). Animal Behaviour, 65, 1161-1167.
Pruett-Jones, S. (1992). Independent versus nonin dependent mate choice: Do females copy each other? The American Naturalist, 140, 1000-1009.
Follet, B.K., Milette, J.J. (1982). Photoperiodism in quail: Testicular grow and maintenance under skelton photoperiods. Journal Endocrinology, 93, 83-90.
Zahavi. A. (1975). Mate selection – a selection for a handicap. Journal of theoretical Biology, 53, 205-214.
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Zuk, M. (1994). Immunology and the evolution of behavior. En L. A. Real (Ed.), Behavioral mechanisms in evolutionary ecology, pp. 354-370. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The Handicap Principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s Puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wingfi eld, J. C., Whaling, C. S. & Marler, P. (1994). Communication in vertebrate aggression and reproduction: The role of hormones. En E. Knobil, J. D. Neill, G. S. Greenwald, C. L. Markert, & D. W. Pfaff (Eds.), Physiology of mammalian reproduction, vol. 2, 2nd ed. Pp. 303-342. Nueva York: Raven Press.
Qvarnström, A. & Price, T. D. (2001). Maternal effects, paternal effects and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 95-100.
Vos, D. R. (1995). Sexual imprinting in zebra-finch females: Do females develop a preference for males that look like their father? Ethology, 99, 252-262.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. En B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man. Chicago: Aldine.
Travers, S. E., & Sih, A. (1991). The influence of starvation and predators on the mating behavior of a semiaquatic insect. Ecology, 72, 2123-2136.
Ten Cate, C. & Bateson, P. P. G. (1989). Sexual imprinting and preference for “supernormal” partners in Japanese quail. Animal Behaviour, 38, 356-358.
Sullivan, M. S. (1994). Mate choice as an information gathering process under a time constraint: Implications for behaviour and signal design. Animal Behaviour, 47, 141-151.
Sluckin, W. (1964). Imprinting and early learning. Londres: Methuen.
Suboski, M. D. (1989). Recognition learning in birds. Perspectives in Ethology, 8, 137-171.
Suboski, M. D. (1988). Acquisition and social communication of stimulus recognition by fi sh. Behavioural Processes, 16, 213-244.
Signoret, J. P. (1970). Reproductive behaviour of pigs. Journal of Reproductive Fertility Supplement, 11, 105-117.
Shettleworth, S. J. (1984). Function and mechanism in learning. En M. D. Zeiler, P. Harzem (Eds.) Advances in Analysis of Behavior. 3, 1-39. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Intersci.
Scott, J. P, (1962), Critical periods in behavioral development. Science, 138, 949-957.
Salzen, E. A. (1962). Imprinting and fear. Animal Behaviour, 10, 183.
Galef, B. G. & With, D. J. (1998). Mate-choice copying in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Animal Behavior, 55, 542-552.
Fantz, R. (1954). Object preferences and pattern vision in newly hatched chicks. Tesis de doctorado no publicada, University of Chicago.
Fabricius, E. (1962). Some aspects of imprinting. Animal Behavior, 10, 181-182.
Artículo de revista
Anderson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Adkins-Regan, E. (1998). Hormonal mechanisms of mate choice. American Zoologist, 38, 166-178.
Tiberio Pérez Manrique, Germán Gutierrez - 2006
Español
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/400
Acta Colombiana de Psicología
Universidad Católica de Colombia
application/pdf
2
Ardila, R. (1975). Imprinting sexual. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 7, 289-297.
9
Impronta
Selección sexual
Preferencias sexuales
Experiencia social
Gutierrez, Germán
Pérez Manrique, Tiberio
Las teorías clásicas propuestas para explicar las preferencias sexuales han hecho énfasis en los determinantes genéticos; consideran que las preferencias de las hembras y los rasgos sexuales de los machos coevolucionan, porque los rasgos son un indicador confiable de “buenos genes” que favorecen la supervivencia de los hijos. Una hipótesis alternativa explica las preferencias sexuales mediante un mecanismo de aprendizaje; un ejemplo de este enfoque es el aprendizaje por impronta propuesto por Konrad Lorenz. El presente experimento se propuso evaluar los efectos de diferentes prácticas de crianza temprana sobre las preferencias de pareja. Para este propósito, se seleccionaron 35 pollitos de codorniz, de 15 días de nacidos, y se dividieron en cuatro grupos: (1) un grupo de 9 pollitos machos criados cada uno en compañía de una hembra adulta de tres meses;(2) un grupo de 9 pollitos hembras criadas cada una en compañía de un macho adulto de tres meses; (3) un grupo de 9 pollitos machos criados en jaulas individuales y sin contacto visual con otros de su especie, y (4) un grupo de 8 pollitos hembras criadas en jaulas individuales y sin contacto visual con otros de su especie. Estas condiciones se mantuvieron por tres meses, al cabo de los cuales cada uno de los animales fue sometido a una prueba de preferencia de pareja y se midió el tiempo que el animal dedicaba a observar a una pareja potencial (la pareja con la que se había criado y una pareja distinta) en ensayos de 10 minutos, duran te 10 días. Los resultados muestran que el 50 por ciento de los 18 pollitos que conformaron los grupos de machos y hembras criados en pareja, presentaron diferencias significativas (23 por ciento a favor de la pareja de crianza y 27 por ciento a favor de una pareja distinta); y de los 17 pollitos que conformaron los grupos de crianza individualizada, sólo el 12 por ciento del grupo de machos mostró diferencias significativas en sus preferencias de pareja. Al comparar las diferentes condiciones de crianza mediante un ANOVA de una vía se obtuvieron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ellas: F (7, 663) = 2,072, P < 0,05. Los resultados de este experimento permiten afirmar que las condiciones de crianza actúan diferencialmente en las preferencias de pareja y parecen tener un mayor efecto en las hembras.
Andersson, M. (1986). Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: Sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution, 40, 804-816.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Ardila, R, (1967). Trabajos experimentales sobre los efectos de las experiencias tempranas en la conducta posterior. Revista de Psicología, 10, 85-91.
Beach, F. A. (1956). Characteristics of masculine “sex drive”. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 4, 1-32.
Eliasson, M. & Meyerson, B. (1981). Development of sociosexual approach behavior in male laboratory rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 95, 160-165.
Domjan, M., Lyons, R., North, N. C. & Bruell, J. (1986). Sexual Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior in male Japanese quail. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 100, 413-421.
Domjan, M., Cusato, B., & Villarreal, R. (2000). Pavlovian feed-forward mechanisms in control of social behavior. Behavioral and Brain Science, 23, 235-249.
Dawkins, R. & Krebs. J. R. (1978). Animal Signals: Information or manipulation? En Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary approach, edited by J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer, pp. 380-402.
Darwin, C. (1871/1989). El origen del hombre. Madrid: EDAF, S.A.
Craig, W. (1908). The voices of pigeons regarded as a means of social control. American Journal of Sociology, 14, 86-100.
Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Parker, G. A. (1995). Sexual coercion in animal societies. Animal Behavior, 49, 1245-1365.
Borgia, G. (1979). Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In M. S. Blum & N. A. Blum (Eds.), Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. (p. 19-80). Nueva York: Academic Press.
Bolhuis, J. J. (1989). The development and stability of filial preferences in the chick. University of Groningen. Disertación doctoral no publicada.
Bischof, H. J. (1994). Sexual imprinting as a two-stage process. En J. A. Hogan & J. Bolhuis (Ed.), Causal mechanisms of behavioural development (pp. 82-97). Cambridge: University Press.
Ball, G. F. & Balthazart, J. (2001). Ethological concepts revisited: Immediate early gene induction in response to sexual stimuli in birds. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 57, 252-270.
Berglund, A., Bisazza, A. & Pilastro, A. (1996). Armaments and ornaments: An evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 58, 385-399.
Publication
Bateson, P. (1982). Preferences for cousins in Japanese quail. Nature, 295, 236-237. University Press, pp. 257-277.
Balthazart, J. & Ball, G. F. (1998). New insights into the regulation and function of brain estrogen synthesis (aromatase). Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 243-249.
Balthazart, J. & Absil, P. (1997). Identification of catecholaminergic inputs to and outputs from aromatase-containing brain areas of the Japanese quail by tract tracing combined with tyrosine hydroxylase immunocytochemistry. Journal Comparative Neurology, 382, 401-428.
Bateson, P. (1983). Optimal outbreeding. En P. Bateson (Ed.), Mate choice. Cambridge, MA:
Balthazart, J. (1983). Hormonal correlates of behavior. En D. S. Farner et al. (Ed.), Avian biology, Vol. VII, pp. 221- 366. London – Nueva York: Academic Press.
Bateson, P. P. G. (1966). The characteristics and context of imprinting. Biological Reviews, 41, 171-220.
Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349-368.
Imprinting
Current theories that attempt to explain mating preferences have placed particular emphasis on genetic determinants. They state that sexual preferences of females and sexual features of males evolve concurrently given the fact that male features are a reliable indicator of the presence of “good genes” which favor offspring survival. An alternative hypothesis explains mating preferences by means of a learning mechanism. An example of this approach is the theory of learning by imprinting proposed by Konrad Lorenz. This experiment aimed to evaluate the effects of different types of early breeding practices on later mating preferences. For this purpose, 35 quail chicks, 15 days old, were selected and split into four groups: (1) a group of 9 male chicks which were individually raised in the company of a mature three months old female; (2) a group of 9 female chicks which were individually raised in the company of a mature three months old male; (3) a group of 9 male chicks, which were raised alone in individual cages and without visual contact with other members of their species; and (4) a group of 8 female chicks which were raised alone in individual cages and without visual contact with others of their species. Subjects were exposed to these conditions for a period of three months. Later, each one of the animals underwent a mating preference test where the time that an animal spent observing a potential partner (the partner the chick had been raised with and a different partner) was measured during a 10-minutes trial for10 days. Results show that 50 percent of the18 chicks that formed the groups of males and females raised in a pair fashion, presented significant differences in mating preferences (23 percent in favor of the breeding partner and 27 percent in favor of a different partner). But in the group of 17 chicks that were placed in the condition of individualized breeding, only 12 percent of the male chicks showed significant differences in their preference for a specific partner. When comparing the various rearing conditions by means of an ANOVA, significant differences were obtained between them: F (7,663) = 2,072, P <0, 05. The results of this experiment suggest that rearing conditions have a differential effect on males and females in terms of mating preferences and seem to have a greater impact on females.
Journal article
Effects of early social experiences on mating preferences of coturnix japonica.
Social experience
Mating preferences
Sexual selection
57
73
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/400/403
0123-9155
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/400
1909-9711
2006-07-01T00:00:00Z
2006-07-01
2006-07-01T00:00:00Z
institution UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADCATOLICADECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Acta Colombiana de Psicología
title Efectos de la experiencia social temprana en las preferencias sexuales de la codorniz japonesa (coturnix japonica).
spellingShingle Efectos de la experiencia social temprana en las preferencias sexuales de la codorniz japonesa (coturnix japonica).
Gutierrez, Germán
Pérez Manrique, Tiberio
Impronta
Selección sexual
Preferencias sexuales
Experiencia social
Imprinting
Social experience
Mating preferences
Sexual selection
title_short Efectos de la experiencia social temprana en las preferencias sexuales de la codorniz japonesa (coturnix japonica).
title_full Efectos de la experiencia social temprana en las preferencias sexuales de la codorniz japonesa (coturnix japonica).
title_fullStr Efectos de la experiencia social temprana en las preferencias sexuales de la codorniz japonesa (coturnix japonica).
title_full_unstemmed Efectos de la experiencia social temprana en las preferencias sexuales de la codorniz japonesa (coturnix japonica).
title_sort efectos de la experiencia social temprana en las preferencias sexuales de la codorniz japonesa (coturnix japonica).
title_eng Effects of early social experiences on mating preferences of coturnix japonica.
description Las teorías clásicas propuestas para explicar las preferencias sexuales han hecho énfasis en los determinantes genéticos; consideran que las preferencias de las hembras y los rasgos sexuales de los machos coevolucionan, porque los rasgos son un indicador confiable de “buenos genes” que favorecen la supervivencia de los hijos. Una hipótesis alternativa explica las preferencias sexuales mediante un mecanismo de aprendizaje; un ejemplo de este enfoque es el aprendizaje por impronta propuesto por Konrad Lorenz. El presente experimento se propuso evaluar los efectos de diferentes prácticas de crianza temprana sobre las preferencias de pareja. Para este propósito, se seleccionaron 35 pollitos de codorniz, de 15 días de nacidos, y se dividieron en cuatro grupos: (1) un grupo de 9 pollitos machos criados cada uno en compañía de una hembra adulta de tres meses;(2) un grupo de 9 pollitos hembras criadas cada una en compañía de un macho adulto de tres meses; (3) un grupo de 9 pollitos machos criados en jaulas individuales y sin contacto visual con otros de su especie, y (4) un grupo de 8 pollitos hembras criadas en jaulas individuales y sin contacto visual con otros de su especie. Estas condiciones se mantuvieron por tres meses, al cabo de los cuales cada uno de los animales fue sometido a una prueba de preferencia de pareja y se midió el tiempo que el animal dedicaba a observar a una pareja potencial (la pareja con la que se había criado y una pareja distinta) en ensayos de 10 minutos, duran te 10 días. Los resultados muestran que el 50 por ciento de los 18 pollitos que conformaron los grupos de machos y hembras criados en pareja, presentaron diferencias significativas (23 por ciento a favor de la pareja de crianza y 27 por ciento a favor de una pareja distinta); y de los 17 pollitos que conformaron los grupos de crianza individualizada, sólo el 12 por ciento del grupo de machos mostró diferencias significativas en sus preferencias de pareja. Al comparar las diferentes condiciones de crianza mediante un ANOVA de una vía se obtuvieron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ellas: F (7, 663) = 2,072, P < 0,05. Los resultados de este experimento permiten afirmar que las condiciones de crianza actúan diferencialmente en las preferencias de pareja y parecen tener un mayor efecto en las hembras.
description_eng Current theories that attempt to explain mating preferences have placed particular emphasis on genetic determinants. They state that sexual preferences of females and sexual features of males evolve concurrently given the fact that male features are a reliable indicator of the presence of “good genes” which favor offspring survival. An alternative hypothesis explains mating preferences by means of a learning mechanism. An example of this approach is the theory of learning by imprinting proposed by Konrad Lorenz. This experiment aimed to evaluate the effects of different types of early breeding practices on later mating preferences. For this purpose, 35 quail chicks, 15 days old, were selected and split into four groups: (1) a group of 9 male chicks which were individually raised in the company of a mature three months old female; (2) a group of 9 female chicks which were individually raised in the company of a mature three months old male; (3) a group of 9 male chicks, which were raised alone in individual cages and without visual contact with other members of their species; and (4) a group of 8 female chicks which were raised alone in individual cages and without visual contact with others of their species. Subjects were exposed to these conditions for a period of three months. Later, each one of the animals underwent a mating preference test where the time that an animal spent observing a potential partner (the partner the chick had been raised with and a different partner) was measured during a 10-minutes trial for10 days. Results show that 50 percent of the18 chicks that formed the groups of males and females raised in a pair fashion, presented significant differences in mating preferences (23 percent in favor of the breeding partner and 27 percent in favor of a different partner). But in the group of 17 chicks that were placed in the condition of individualized breeding, only 12 percent of the male chicks showed significant differences in their preference for a specific partner. When comparing the various rearing conditions by means of an ANOVA, significant differences were obtained between them: F (7,663) = 2,072, P <0, 05. The results of this experiment suggest that rearing conditions have a differential effect on males and females in terms of mating preferences and seem to have a greater impact on females.
author Gutierrez, Germán
Pérez Manrique, Tiberio
author_facet Gutierrez, Germán
Pérez Manrique, Tiberio
topicspa_str_mv Impronta
Selección sexual
Preferencias sexuales
Experiencia social
topic Impronta
Selección sexual
Preferencias sexuales
Experiencia social
Imprinting
Social experience
Mating preferences
Sexual selection
topic_facet Impronta
Selección sexual
Preferencias sexuales
Experiencia social
Imprinting
Social experience
Mating preferences
Sexual selection
citationvolume 9
citationissue 2
publisher Universidad Católica de Colombia
ispartofjournal Acta Colombiana de Psicología
source https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/400
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Tiberio Pérez Manrique, Germán Gutierrez - 2006
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
references Johnson, W. A. & Tiefer, L. (1972). Sexual preferences in neonatally castrated golden hamsters. Hormones and Behavior, 9, 213-218.
Persaud, K. & Galef, B. G., Jr. (2003). Female Japanese quail aggregate to avoid sexual harassment by conspecific males: A possible cause of conspecific cueing. Animal Behaviour, 65, 89-94.
Premack, D. (1965). Reinforcement Theory. En D. Levine (Dir.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.(Vol. 13 pp. 123-1809. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Pfaus, J. G. (1996). Frank A. Beach Award - Homologies of animal and human sexual behaviors. Hormones and Behavior, 30, 187-200.
Pavlov, I. P. (1997). Los reflejos condicionados (A. Gallardo, trad.). Madrid, España: Morata. (Trabajo original publicado en 1927).
Owens, I. P. F., Rowe, C. & Thomas, A. L. R. (1999). Sexual selection, speciation and imprinting: separating the sheep from the goats. Tree, 14, 131-132.
Nosofky, R. M. (1991). Test of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptual Performance, 17, 3-27.
Meyerson, B. J. & Lindström, L. H. (1973). Sexual motivation in the female rat: A methodological study applied to the effect of estradiol benzoate. Acta Physiology. Scand. Supplement. 389, 1-80.
McGregor, P. K. & Peake, T. (2000). Communication networks: Social environments for receiving and signaling behaviour. Acta Ethologica, 2, 71-81.
McBride, T. C. & Lickliter, R. (1993). Social experience with siblings fosters species -specific responsiveness to maternal visual cues in Bobwhite Quail Chicks (Colinus virginianus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107, 320-327.
Llinás, R. (2003). El cerebro y el mito del yo. El papel de las neuronas en el pensamiento y el comportamiento humano. Bogotá: Norma.
Lorenz, K. Z (1935). Der kumpan in der Umweld des Vogels; die Artenosse als auslosende Moment Sozialer Verhaltungswiesen. Journal Fur Ornithologie. 83, 137-214.
Irwin, D. E. & Price, T. (1999). Sexual imprinting learning and speciation. Heredity, 82, 347-354.
Price, T. (1998). Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Philosophical. Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B. 353, 251-260.
Hutchison, J. R., & Hutchison, R. E. (1983). Hormonal mechanisms of mate choice in birds. En P. Bateson (Ed.), Mate choice, pp. 389-406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hollis, K. L., Ten Cate, C. & Bateson, P. P. G. (1991). Stimulus representation: subprocess of imprinting and conditioning. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 105, 307-317.
Hollis, K. L. (1997). Contemporary research on Pavlonian condi tioning: a “new” functional analysis. American Psychologist, 52, 956-965.
Hollis, K. L. (1990). The role of Pavlovian conditioning in territorial aggression and reproduction. En D. Dewsbury (Ed.), Contemporary Issues in Comparative Psychology. pp. 197-219. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Hollis, K. L. (1982). Pavlovian conditioning of signal-centered action patterns and autonomic behavior: a biological analysis of function. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 12, 1-64.
Hess, E. H. (1959). The relationship between imprinting and motivation. En M. R. Jones. (dir), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior. Nueva York: Wiley.
Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science, 4570 (218), 384-387.
Gutierrez, G. & Domjan, M. (1997). Differences in the sexual conditioned behavior of male and female Japanese quail (Cutornix Japonica). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 135-142.
Gutierrez, G. & Domjan, M. (1996). Learning and male-male sexual competition in Japanese quail (Cutornix Japonica). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110, 170-175.
Gunther, L. M., Miller, R. R. & Matute, H. (1997). CSs and USs: What’s the difference? Journal Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 15-30.
Gibson, E. J. (1991). An odyssey in learning and perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pilastro, A., Benetton, S., & Bisazza, A. (2003). Female aggregation and male competition reduce costs of sexual harassment in the mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). Animal Behaviour, 65, 1161-1167.
Pruett-Jones, S. (1992). Independent versus nonin dependent mate choice: Do females copy each other? The American Naturalist, 140, 1000-1009.
Follet, B.K., Milette, J.J. (1982). Photoperiodism in quail: Testicular grow and maintenance under skelton photoperiods. Journal Endocrinology, 93, 83-90.
Zahavi. A. (1975). Mate selection – a selection for a handicap. Journal of theoretical Biology, 53, 205-214.
Zuk, M. (1994). Immunology and the evolution of behavior. En L. A. Real (Ed.), Behavioral mechanisms in evolutionary ecology, pp. 354-370. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The Handicap Principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s Puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wingfi eld, J. C., Whaling, C. S. & Marler, P. (1994). Communication in vertebrate aggression and reproduction: The role of hormones. En E. Knobil, J. D. Neill, G. S. Greenwald, C. L. Markert, & D. W. Pfaff (Eds.), Physiology of mammalian reproduction, vol. 2, 2nd ed. Pp. 303-342. Nueva York: Raven Press.
Qvarnström, A. & Price, T. D. (2001). Maternal effects, paternal effects and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 95-100.
Vos, D. R. (1995). Sexual imprinting in zebra-finch females: Do females develop a preference for males that look like their father? Ethology, 99, 252-262.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. En B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man. Chicago: Aldine.
Travers, S. E., & Sih, A. (1991). The influence of starvation and predators on the mating behavior of a semiaquatic insect. Ecology, 72, 2123-2136.
Ten Cate, C. & Bateson, P. P. G. (1989). Sexual imprinting and preference for “supernormal” partners in Japanese quail. Animal Behaviour, 38, 356-358.
Sullivan, M. S. (1994). Mate choice as an information gathering process under a time constraint: Implications for behaviour and signal design. Animal Behaviour, 47, 141-151.
Sluckin, W. (1964). Imprinting and early learning. Londres: Methuen.
Suboski, M. D. (1989). Recognition learning in birds. Perspectives in Ethology, 8, 137-171.
Suboski, M. D. (1988). Acquisition and social communication of stimulus recognition by fi sh. Behavioural Processes, 16, 213-244.
Signoret, J. P. (1970). Reproductive behaviour of pigs. Journal of Reproductive Fertility Supplement, 11, 105-117.
Shettleworth, S. J. (1984). Function and mechanism in learning. En M. D. Zeiler, P. Harzem (Eds.) Advances in Analysis of Behavior. 3, 1-39. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Intersci.
Scott, J. P, (1962), Critical periods in behavioral development. Science, 138, 949-957.
Salzen, E. A. (1962). Imprinting and fear. Animal Behaviour, 10, 183.
Galef, B. G. & With, D. J. (1998). Mate-choice copying in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Animal Behavior, 55, 542-552.
Fantz, R. (1954). Object preferences and pattern vision in newly hatched chicks. Tesis de doctorado no publicada, University of Chicago.
Fabricius, E. (1962). Some aspects of imprinting. Animal Behavior, 10, 181-182.
Anderson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Adkins-Regan, E. (1998). Hormonal mechanisms of mate choice. American Zoologist, 38, 166-178.
Ardila, R. (1975). Imprinting sexual. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 7, 289-297.
Andersson, M. (1986). Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: Sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution, 40, 804-816.
Ardila, R, (1967). Trabajos experimentales sobre los efectos de las experiencias tempranas en la conducta posterior. Revista de Psicología, 10, 85-91.
Beach, F. A. (1956). Characteristics of masculine “sex drive”. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 4, 1-32.
Eliasson, M. & Meyerson, B. (1981). Development of sociosexual approach behavior in male laboratory rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 95, 160-165.
Domjan, M., Lyons, R., North, N. C. & Bruell, J. (1986). Sexual Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior in male Japanese quail. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 100, 413-421.
Domjan, M., Cusato, B., & Villarreal, R. (2000). Pavlovian feed-forward mechanisms in control of social behavior. Behavioral and Brain Science, 23, 235-249.
Dawkins, R. & Krebs. J. R. (1978). Animal Signals: Information or manipulation? En Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary approach, edited by J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer, pp. 380-402.
Darwin, C. (1871/1989). El origen del hombre. Madrid: EDAF, S.A.
Craig, W. (1908). The voices of pigeons regarded as a means of social control. American Journal of Sociology, 14, 86-100.
Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Parker, G. A. (1995). Sexual coercion in animal societies. Animal Behavior, 49, 1245-1365.
Borgia, G. (1979). Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In M. S. Blum & N. A. Blum (Eds.), Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. (p. 19-80). Nueva York: Academic Press.
Bolhuis, J. J. (1989). The development and stability of filial preferences in the chick. University of Groningen. Disertación doctoral no publicada.
Bischof, H. J. (1994). Sexual imprinting as a two-stage process. En J. A. Hogan & J. Bolhuis (Ed.), Causal mechanisms of behavioural development (pp. 82-97). Cambridge: University Press.
Ball, G. F. & Balthazart, J. (2001). Ethological concepts revisited: Immediate early gene induction in response to sexual stimuli in birds. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 57, 252-270.
Berglund, A., Bisazza, A. & Pilastro, A. (1996). Armaments and ornaments: An evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 58, 385-399.
Bateson, P. (1982). Preferences for cousins in Japanese quail. Nature, 295, 236-237. University Press, pp. 257-277.
Balthazart, J. & Ball, G. F. (1998). New insights into the regulation and function of brain estrogen synthesis (aromatase). Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 243-249.
Balthazart, J. & Absil, P. (1997). Identification of catecholaminergic inputs to and outputs from aromatase-containing brain areas of the Japanese quail by tract tracing combined with tyrosine hydroxylase immunocytochemistry. Journal Comparative Neurology, 382, 401-428.
Bateson, P. (1983). Optimal outbreeding. En P. Bateson (Ed.), Mate choice. Cambridge, MA:
Balthazart, J. (1983). Hormonal correlates of behavior. En D. S. Farner et al. (Ed.), Avian biology, Vol. VII, pp. 221- 366. London – Nueva York: Academic Press.
Bateson, P. P. G. (1966). The characteristics and context of imprinting. Biological Reviews, 41, 171-220.
Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349-368.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2006-07-01
date_accessioned 2006-07-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2006-07-01T00:00:00Z
url https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/400
url_doi https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/400
issn 0123-9155
eissn 1909-9711
citationstartpage 57
citationendpage 73
url2_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/400/403
_version_ 1797158885432229888

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares