Lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa.
Las personas con dificultades en la producción del lenguaje deben enfrentarse a situaciones que les hace depender día a día de otras personas, ya que no pueden comunicar sus pensamientos ni necesidades. Para ayudar a estas personas los sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA) ofrecen la posibilidad de transmitir información a partir de la selección de componentes gráficos que representan la realidad, entre los problemas de este tipo de sistemas se encuentran los bajos niveles de usabilidad en las interfaces gráficas y el uso de pictogramas que no se adecuan al contexto y lenguaje de los usuarios. Este trabajo presenta una serie de factores a tener en cuenta al momento de diseñar una interfaz gráfica para sistemas CAA y la ev... Ver más
1794-7111
2462-8115
16
2019-07-01
345
375
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Cristian Andrés Narváez - 2019
id |
0b4a149c96781264af524ab18cd1d68d |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
Lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa. Narváez, C. Sastoque, S. and Iregui, M. (2015). Spanish language generation engine to enhance the syntactic quality of AAC systems. 11th International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis (SIPAIM 2015). DOI: https://10.1117/12.2211435 Blake, M. (2000). Examining perceptions of graphic symbols across cultures: Preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, vol. 16, 180-185). DOI: https://10.1080/07434610012331279034. Davidson, B., Howe, T., Worrall, L., Hickson, L., and Togher, L. (2008). Social participation for older people with aphasia: The impact of communication disability on friendships. Topics in stroke rehabilitation, vol. 15, 325-340. DOI: https://10.1310/tsr1504-325. Dumas, J. (2002, January). User-based evaluations. In The human-computer interaction handbook (pp. 1093-1117). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. ISBN: 0- 8058-3838-4. Higginbotham, D. and Bedrosian, J. (1995). Subject selection in AAC research: Decision points. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, vol. 11, 11-13. DOI: https://10.1080/07434619512331277099. Hillis, A. (2007). Aphasia progress in the last quarter of a century. Neurology, vol. 69, 200-213. DOI: https://10.1212/01.wnl.0000265600.69385.6f. Hornero, G., Conde, D., Quílez, M., Domingo, S., Rodríguez, M., Romero, B. and Casas, O. (2015). A wireless augmentative and alternative communication system for people with speech disabilities., IEEE Access, vol. 3, 1288-1297. DOI: https://10.1109/access.2015.2466110. International Organization for Standardization. (2018). Ergonomics of humansystem interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts (ISO 9241- 11:2018). Recuperado de https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en. Keskinen, T., Heimonen, T., Turunen, M. Rajaniemi, J. and Kauppinen, S. (2012). SymbolChat: A flexible picture-based communication platform for users with intellectual disabilities. Interacting with Computers, vol. 24, 374-386. DOI: https://10.1016/j.intcom.2012.06.003. Lam, J. & Wodchis, W. (2010). The relationship of 60 disease diagnoses and 15 conditions to preference-based health-related quality of life in Ontario hospital-based long-term care residents. Medical care, 48, 380-387. DOI: https://10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca2647. Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). The Changing Face of Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Past, Present, and Future Challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 197-204. DOI: https://10.3109/07434618.2012.737024. Salminen, A., Petrie, H. and Ryan, S. (2004). Impact of computer augmented communication on the daily lives of speech-impaired children. Part I: Daily communication and activities., Technology and Disability, vol. 16, 157- 167. DOI: https://10.3233/tad-2004-16306. Chan, R. (2014). Cloud augmentative and alternative communication for people with complex communication needs. Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) (2727-2732). IEEE. DOI: https://10.1109/glocom.2014.7037220. Mancilla, D., Sastoque, S., & Iregui, M. (2015, January). Towards ontology personalization to enrich social conversations on AAC systems. In 10th International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis (Vol. 9287, p. 92870Z). International Society for Optics and Photonics. DOI: https://10.1117/12.2073865. Mancilla, D., Sastoque, S., Mendoza, J. and Iregui, M. (2013). Conceptualizing a daily activities ontology for an augmentative and alternative communication system. 5th Latin American Conference on Networked and Electronic Media (LACNEM-2013). Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Sede Manizales. DOI: https://10.1117/12.2073865. Quesenbery, W. (2004). Balancing the 5Es of Usability. Cutter IT Journal, vol. 17, 4-11. Babic, J., Slivar, I., Car, Z. and Podobnik, V. (2015). Prototype-driven software development process for augmentative and alternative communication applications. 13th International Conference on Telecommunications (ConTEL). DOI: https://10.1109/ConTEL.2015.7231204. Hernández, S. S., Mancilla, D., Medina, J. M., & Iregui, M. (2014). Usercentric Recommendation Model for AAC based on Multi-criteria Planning. International Conference on Advances in Human-oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Technologies and Services. ISBN: 978-1-61208-369-8. Sastoque, S., Narváez, C. y Garnica, G. (2016). Metodología para la construcción de Interfaces Gráficas Centradas en el Usuario. Nuevas Ideas en Informática Educativa, vol. 12, 314-324. ISBN: 978-956-19-0989-2. Saturno, C., Ramirez, A., Conte, M., Farhat, M., y Piucco, E. (2015). An augmentative and alternative communication tool for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 34, 632-645. DOI: https://10.1080/0144929X.2015.1019567. Seffah, A., Donyaee, M., Kline, R. y Padda, H. (2006). Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model. Software Quality Journal, vol. 14, 159-178. DOI: https://10.1007/s11219-006-7600-8. Stent, A. & Bangalore, S., Natural language generation in interactive systems. Cambridge University Press, 2014. DOI: https://10.1007/CBO9780511844492. The State of Queensland, Complex communication needs (2018). Retrieved from https://www.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/58540/complexcommunication-needs.pdf Van, E. and Alant, E. (2004). Associations with Minspeak™ icons. Journal of communication disorders, vol. 37, 255-274. DOI: https://10.1016/j.jcomdis.2003.10.002. info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Belani, H. (2012, June). Towards a usability requirements taxonomy for mobile AAC services. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Usability and Accessibility Focused Requirements Engineering (pp. 36-39). IEEE Press. DOI: https://10.1109/usare.2012.6226789. Al Mahmud, A. and Martens, J. (2016). Social networking through email: studying email usage patterns of persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, vol. 30, 186-210. Publication 16 Núm. 20 , Año 2019 : Julio - Diciembre Artículo de revista Al-Arifi, B., Al-Rubaian, A., Al-Ofisan, G., Al-Romi, N., & Al-Wabil, A. (2013, July). Towards an arabic language augmentative and alternative communication application for autism. International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability ,333-341. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: https://10.1007/978-3-642-39241-2_37. usabilidad application/pdf Universidad de Caldas Kepes sistema de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA) diseño de interfaces gráficas https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/188 Garnica Gaitán, Germán Andrés Narváez Alarcón, Cristian Andrés Español https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Cristian Andrés Narváez - 2019 Las personas con dificultades en la producción del lenguaje deben enfrentarse a situaciones que les hace depender día a día de otras personas, ya que no pueden comunicar sus pensamientos ni necesidades. Para ayudar a estas personas los sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA) ofrecen la posibilidad de transmitir información a partir de la selección de componentes gráficos que representan la realidad, entre los problemas de este tipo de sistemas se encuentran los bajos niveles de usabilidad en las interfaces gráficas y el uso de pictogramas que no se adecuan al contexto y lenguaje de los usuarios. Este trabajo presenta una serie de factores a tener en cuenta al momento de diseñar una interfaz gráfica para sistemas CAA y la evaluación de material gráfico diseñado específicamente para el contexto de los usuarios con afasia, una enfermedad que se caracteriza por la pérdida de la capacidad de producir y comprender el lenguaje oral y escrito. Las pruebas señalan que adicional a la posibilidad de modificar factores de posición, tamaño y color, es necesario incluir imágenes que hagan parte del contexto del usuario facilitando la selección de las imágenes relevantes para la creación del mensaje. Los resultados de esta propuesta pueden ser de utilidad para desarrolladores de sistemas CAA ya que sirven como guía para el diseño de interfaces que facilitan al usuario la creación de frases. 20 augmentative and alternative communication systems (AAC) graphic interfaces design People with language production disabilities must challenge different situations in which they depend on others to share their feelings and necessities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) systems had emerged as an alternative to give the possibility of sharing information using graphic content selection. Some problems this kind of systems have are the low user interfaces usability levels, the nonuse of context and the lack of language-related pictograms. In this paper, a set of factors to be taken into account at the AAC systems interface design process are presented. This work also shows the evaluation of graphic content designed specifically for the context of users with aphasia, an impairment characterized by the loss of capabilities to understand and produce writing or speech. Test results showed that besides the modification of position, size, and color factors it’s necessary to include relevant images according to the user’s context facilitating the production of the message. The proposal results can be used by AAC systems developers as a guide to the development of interfaces that enhance the sentences creation process. Graphic interfaces and graphic components design guidelines for augmentative and alternative communication systems. usability Journal article 2019-07-01T00:00:00Z https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/188/148 2019-07-01 1794-7111 2462-8115 10.17151/kepes.2019.16.20.13 https://doi.org/10.17151/kepes.2019.16.20.13 345 375 2019-07-01T00:00:00Z |
institution |
UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS |
thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png |
country_str |
Colombia |
collection |
Kepes |
title |
Lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa. |
spellingShingle |
Lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa. Garnica Gaitán, Germán Andrés Narváez Alarcón, Cristian Andrés usabilidad sistema de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA) diseño de interfaces gráficas augmentative and alternative communication systems (AAC) graphic interfaces design usability |
title_short |
Lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa. |
title_full |
Lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa. |
title_fullStr |
Lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa. |
title_sort |
lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa. |
title_eng |
Graphic interfaces and graphic components design guidelines for augmentative and alternative communication systems. |
description |
Las personas con dificultades en la producción del lenguaje deben enfrentarse a situaciones que les hace depender día a día de otras personas, ya que no pueden comunicar sus pensamientos ni necesidades. Para ayudar a estas personas los sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA) ofrecen la posibilidad de transmitir información a partir de la selección de componentes gráficos que representan la realidad, entre los problemas de este tipo de sistemas se encuentran los bajos niveles de usabilidad en las interfaces gráficas y el uso de pictogramas que no se adecuan al contexto y lenguaje de los usuarios. Este trabajo presenta una serie de factores a tener en cuenta al momento de diseñar una interfaz gráfica para sistemas CAA y la evaluación de material gráfico diseñado específicamente para el contexto de los usuarios con afasia, una enfermedad que se caracteriza por la pérdida de la capacidad de producir y comprender el lenguaje oral y escrito. Las pruebas señalan que adicional a la posibilidad de modificar factores de posición, tamaño y color, es necesario incluir imágenes que hagan parte del contexto del usuario facilitando la selección de las imágenes relevantes para la creación del mensaje. Los resultados de esta propuesta pueden ser de utilidad para desarrolladores de sistemas CAA ya que sirven como guía para el diseño de interfaces que facilitan al usuario la creación de frases.
|
description_eng |
People with language production disabilities must challenge different situations in which they depend on others to share their feelings and necessities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) systems had emerged as an alternative to give the possibility of sharing information using graphic content selection. Some problems this kind of systems have are the low user interfaces usability levels, the nonuse of context and the lack of language-related pictograms. In this paper, a set of factors to be taken into account at the AAC systems interface design process are presented. This work also shows the evaluation of graphic content designed specifically for the context of users with aphasia, an impairment characterized by the loss of capabilities to understand and produce writing or speech. Test results showed that besides the modification of position, size, and color factors it’s necessary to include relevant images according to the user’s context facilitating the production of the message. The proposal results can be used by AAC systems developers as a guide to the development of interfaces that enhance the sentences creation process.
|
author |
Garnica Gaitán, Germán Andrés Narváez Alarcón, Cristian Andrés |
author_facet |
Garnica Gaitán, Germán Andrés Narváez Alarcón, Cristian Andrés |
topicspa_str_mv |
usabilidad sistema de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA) diseño de interfaces gráficas |
topic |
usabilidad sistema de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA) diseño de interfaces gráficas augmentative and alternative communication systems (AAC) graphic interfaces design usability |
topic_facet |
usabilidad sistema de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA) diseño de interfaces gráficas augmentative and alternative communication systems (AAC) graphic interfaces design usability |
citationvolume |
16 |
citationissue |
20 |
citationedition |
Núm. 20 , Año 2019 : Julio - Diciembre |
publisher |
Universidad de Caldas |
ispartofjournal |
Kepes |
source |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/188 |
language |
Español |
format |
Article |
rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Cristian Andrés Narváez - 2019 |
references |
Narváez, C. Sastoque, S. and Iregui, M. (2015). Spanish language generation engine to enhance the syntactic quality of AAC systems. 11th International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis (SIPAIM 2015). DOI: https://10.1117/12.2211435 Blake, M. (2000). Examining perceptions of graphic symbols across cultures: Preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, vol. 16, 180-185). DOI: https://10.1080/07434610012331279034. Davidson, B., Howe, T., Worrall, L., Hickson, L., and Togher, L. (2008). Social participation for older people with aphasia: The impact of communication disability on friendships. Topics in stroke rehabilitation, vol. 15, 325-340. DOI: https://10.1310/tsr1504-325. Dumas, J. (2002, January). User-based evaluations. In The human-computer interaction handbook (pp. 1093-1117). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. ISBN: 0- 8058-3838-4. Higginbotham, D. and Bedrosian, J. (1995). Subject selection in AAC research: Decision points. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, vol. 11, 11-13. DOI: https://10.1080/07434619512331277099. Hillis, A. (2007). Aphasia progress in the last quarter of a century. Neurology, vol. 69, 200-213. DOI: https://10.1212/01.wnl.0000265600.69385.6f. Hornero, G., Conde, D., Quílez, M., Domingo, S., Rodríguez, M., Romero, B. and Casas, O. (2015). A wireless augmentative and alternative communication system for people with speech disabilities., IEEE Access, vol. 3, 1288-1297. DOI: https://10.1109/access.2015.2466110. International Organization for Standardization. (2018). Ergonomics of humansystem interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts (ISO 9241- 11:2018). Recuperado de https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en. Keskinen, T., Heimonen, T., Turunen, M. Rajaniemi, J. and Kauppinen, S. (2012). SymbolChat: A flexible picture-based communication platform for users with intellectual disabilities. Interacting with Computers, vol. 24, 374-386. DOI: https://10.1016/j.intcom.2012.06.003. Lam, J. & Wodchis, W. (2010). The relationship of 60 disease diagnoses and 15 conditions to preference-based health-related quality of life in Ontario hospital-based long-term care residents. Medical care, 48, 380-387. DOI: https://10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca2647. Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). The Changing Face of Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Past, Present, and Future Challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 197-204. DOI: https://10.3109/07434618.2012.737024. Salminen, A., Petrie, H. and Ryan, S. (2004). Impact of computer augmented communication on the daily lives of speech-impaired children. Part I: Daily communication and activities., Technology and Disability, vol. 16, 157- 167. DOI: https://10.3233/tad-2004-16306. Chan, R. (2014). Cloud augmentative and alternative communication for people with complex communication needs. Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) (2727-2732). IEEE. DOI: https://10.1109/glocom.2014.7037220. Mancilla, D., Sastoque, S., & Iregui, M. (2015, January). Towards ontology personalization to enrich social conversations on AAC systems. In 10th International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis (Vol. 9287, p. 92870Z). International Society for Optics and Photonics. DOI: https://10.1117/12.2073865. Mancilla, D., Sastoque, S., Mendoza, J. and Iregui, M. (2013). Conceptualizing a daily activities ontology for an augmentative and alternative communication system. 5th Latin American Conference on Networked and Electronic Media (LACNEM-2013). Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Sede Manizales. DOI: https://10.1117/12.2073865. Quesenbery, W. (2004). Balancing the 5Es of Usability. Cutter IT Journal, vol. 17, 4-11. Babic, J., Slivar, I., Car, Z. and Podobnik, V. (2015). Prototype-driven software development process for augmentative and alternative communication applications. 13th International Conference on Telecommunications (ConTEL). DOI: https://10.1109/ConTEL.2015.7231204. Hernández, S. S., Mancilla, D., Medina, J. M., & Iregui, M. (2014). Usercentric Recommendation Model for AAC based on Multi-criteria Planning. International Conference on Advances in Human-oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Technologies and Services. ISBN: 978-1-61208-369-8. Sastoque, S., Narváez, C. y Garnica, G. (2016). Metodología para la construcción de Interfaces Gráficas Centradas en el Usuario. Nuevas Ideas en Informática Educativa, vol. 12, 314-324. ISBN: 978-956-19-0989-2. Saturno, C., Ramirez, A., Conte, M., Farhat, M., y Piucco, E. (2015). An augmentative and alternative communication tool for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 34, 632-645. DOI: https://10.1080/0144929X.2015.1019567. Seffah, A., Donyaee, M., Kline, R. y Padda, H. (2006). Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model. Software Quality Journal, vol. 14, 159-178. DOI: https://10.1007/s11219-006-7600-8. Stent, A. & Bangalore, S., Natural language generation in interactive systems. Cambridge University Press, 2014. DOI: https://10.1007/CBO9780511844492. The State of Queensland, Complex communication needs (2018). Retrieved from https://www.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/58540/complexcommunication-needs.pdf Van, E. and Alant, E. (2004). Associations with Minspeak™ icons. Journal of communication disorders, vol. 37, 255-274. DOI: https://10.1016/j.jcomdis.2003.10.002. Belani, H. (2012, June). Towards a usability requirements taxonomy for mobile AAC services. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Usability and Accessibility Focused Requirements Engineering (pp. 36-39). IEEE Press. DOI: https://10.1109/usare.2012.6226789. Al Mahmud, A. and Martens, J. (2016). Social networking through email: studying email usage patterns of persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, vol. 30, 186-210. Al-Arifi, B., Al-Rubaian, A., Al-Ofisan, G., Al-Romi, N., & Al-Wabil, A. (2013, July). Towards an arabic language augmentative and alternative communication application for autism. International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability ,333-341. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: https://10.1007/978-3-642-39241-2_37. |
type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
type_content |
Text |
publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
date_accessioned |
2019-07-01T00:00:00Z |
date_available |
2019-07-01T00:00:00Z |
url |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/188 |
url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.17151/kepes.2019.16.20.13 |
issn |
1794-7111 |
eissn |
2462-8115 |
doi |
10.17151/kepes.2019.16.20.13 |
citationstartpage |
345 |
citationendpage |
375 |
url2_str_mv |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/188/148 |
_version_ |
1798191664613818368 |