Lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa.

Las personas con dificultades en la producción del lenguaje deben enfrentarse a situaciones que les hace depender día a día de otras personas, ya que no pueden comunicar sus pensamientos ni necesidades. Para ayudar a estas personas los sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA) ofrecen la posibilidad de transmitir información a partir de la selección de componentes gráficos que representan la realidad, entre los problemas de este tipo de sistemas se encuentran los bajos niveles de usabilidad en las interfaces gráficas y el uso de pictogramas que no se adecuan al contexto y lenguaje de los usuarios. Este trabajo presenta una serie de factores a tener en cuenta al momento de diseñar una interfaz gráfica para sistemas CAA y la ev... Ver más

Guardado en:

1794-7111

2462-8115

16

2019-07-01

345

375

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

Cristian Andrés Narváez - 2019

id 0b4a149c96781264af524ab18cd1d68d
record_format ojs
spelling Lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa.
Narváez, C. Sastoque, S. and Iregui, M. (2015). Spanish language generation engine to enhance the syntactic quality of AAC systems. 11th International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis (SIPAIM 2015). DOI: https://10.1117/12.2211435
Blake, M. (2000). Examining perceptions of graphic symbols across cultures: Preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, vol. 16, 180-185). DOI: https://10.1080/07434610012331279034.
Davidson, B., Howe, T., Worrall, L., Hickson, L., and Togher, L. (2008). Social participation for older people with aphasia: The impact of communication disability on friendships. Topics in stroke rehabilitation, vol. 15, 325-340. DOI: https://10.1310/tsr1504-325.
Dumas, J. (2002, January). User-based evaluations. In The human-computer interaction handbook (pp. 1093-1117). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. ISBN: 0- 8058-3838-4.
Higginbotham, D. and Bedrosian, J. (1995). Subject selection in AAC research: Decision points. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, vol. 11, 11-13. DOI: https://10.1080/07434619512331277099.
Hillis, A. (2007). Aphasia progress in the last quarter of a century. Neurology, vol. 69, 200-213. DOI: https://10.1212/01.wnl.0000265600.69385.6f.
Hornero, G., Conde, D., Quílez, M., Domingo, S., Rodríguez, M., Romero, B. and Casas, O. (2015). A wireless augmentative and alternative communication system for people with speech disabilities., IEEE Access, vol. 3, 1288-1297. DOI: https://10.1109/access.2015.2466110.
International Organization for Standardization. (2018). Ergonomics of humansystem interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts (ISO 9241- 11:2018). Recuperado de https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en.
Keskinen, T., Heimonen, T., Turunen, M. Rajaniemi, J. and Kauppinen, S. (2012). SymbolChat: A flexible picture-based communication platform for users with intellectual disabilities. Interacting with Computers, vol. 24, 374-386. DOI: https://10.1016/j.intcom.2012.06.003.
Lam, J. & Wodchis, W. (2010). The relationship of 60 disease diagnoses and 15 conditions to preference-based health-related quality of life in Ontario hospital-based long-term care residents. Medical care, 48, 380-387. DOI: https://10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca2647.
Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). The Changing Face of Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Past, Present, and Future Challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 197-204. DOI: https://10.3109/07434618.2012.737024.
Salminen, A., Petrie, H. and Ryan, S. (2004). Impact of computer augmented communication on the daily lives of speech-impaired children. Part I: Daily communication and activities., Technology and Disability, vol. 16, 157- 167. DOI: https://10.3233/tad-2004-16306.
Chan, R. (2014). Cloud augmentative and alternative communication for people with complex communication needs. Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) (2727-2732). IEEE. DOI: https://10.1109/glocom.2014.7037220.
Mancilla, D., Sastoque, S., & Iregui, M. (2015, January). Towards ontology personalization to enrich social conversations on AAC systems. In 10th International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis (Vol. 9287, p. 92870Z). International Society for Optics and Photonics. DOI: https://10.1117/12.2073865.
Mancilla, D., Sastoque, S., Mendoza, J. and Iregui, M. (2013). Conceptualizing a daily activities ontology for an augmentative and alternative communication system. 5th Latin American Conference on Networked and Electronic Media (LACNEM-2013). Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Sede Manizales. DOI: https://10.1117/12.2073865.
Quesenbery, W. (2004). Balancing the 5Es of Usability. Cutter IT Journal, vol. 17, 4-11.
Babic, J., Slivar, I., Car, Z. and Podobnik, V. (2015). Prototype-driven software development process for augmentative and alternative communication applications. 13th International Conference on Telecommunications (ConTEL). DOI: https://10.1109/ConTEL.2015.7231204.
Hernández, S. S., Mancilla, D., Medina, J. M., & Iregui, M. (2014). Usercentric Recommendation Model for AAC based on Multi-criteria Planning. International Conference on Advances in Human-oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Technologies and Services. ISBN: 978-1-61208-369-8.
Sastoque, S., Narváez, C. y Garnica, G. (2016). Metodología para la construcción de Interfaces Gráficas Centradas en el Usuario. Nuevas Ideas en Informática Educativa, vol. 12, 314-324. ISBN: 978-956-19-0989-2.
Saturno, C., Ramirez, A., Conte, M., Farhat, M., y Piucco, E. (2015). An augmentative and alternative communication tool for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 34, 632-645. DOI: https://10.1080/0144929X.2015.1019567.
Seffah, A., Donyaee, M., Kline, R. y Padda, H. (2006). Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model. Software Quality Journal, vol. 14, 159-178. DOI: https://10.1007/s11219-006-7600-8.
Stent, A. & Bangalore, S., Natural language generation in interactive systems. Cambridge University Press, 2014. DOI: https://10.1007/CBO9780511844492.
The State of Queensland, Complex communication needs (2018). Retrieved from https://www.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/58540/complexcommunication-needs.pdf
Van, E. and Alant, E. (2004). Associations with Minspeak™ icons. Journal of communication disorders, vol. 37, 255-274. DOI: https://10.1016/j.jcomdis.2003.10.002.
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Belani, H. (2012, June). Towards a usability requirements taxonomy for mobile AAC services. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Usability and Accessibility Focused Requirements Engineering (pp. 36-39). IEEE Press. DOI: https://10.1109/usare.2012.6226789.
Al Mahmud, A. and Martens, J. (2016). Social networking through email: studying email usage patterns of persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, vol. 30, 186-210.
Publication
16
Núm. 20 , Año 2019 : Julio - Diciembre
Artículo de revista
Al-Arifi, B., Al-Rubaian, A., Al-Ofisan, G., Al-Romi, N., & Al-Wabil, A. (2013, July). Towards an arabic language augmentative and alternative communication application for autism. International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability ,333-341. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: https://10.1007/978-3-642-39241-2_37.
usabilidad
application/pdf
Universidad de Caldas
Kepes
sistema de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA)
diseño de interfaces gráficas
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/188
Garnica Gaitán, Germán Andrés
Narváez Alarcón, Cristian Andrés
Español
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Cristian Andrés Narváez - 2019
Las personas con dificultades en la producción del lenguaje deben enfrentarse a situaciones que les hace depender día a día de otras personas, ya que no pueden comunicar sus pensamientos ni necesidades. Para ayudar a estas personas los sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA) ofrecen la posibilidad de transmitir información a partir de la selección de componentes gráficos que representan la realidad, entre los problemas de este tipo de sistemas se encuentran los bajos niveles de usabilidad en las interfaces gráficas y el uso de pictogramas que no se adecuan al contexto y lenguaje de los usuarios. Este trabajo presenta una serie de factores a tener en cuenta al momento de diseñar una interfaz gráfica para sistemas CAA y la evaluación de material gráfico diseñado específicamente para el contexto de los usuarios con afasia, una enfermedad que se caracteriza por la pérdida de la capacidad de producir y comprender el lenguaje oral y escrito. Las pruebas señalan que adicional a la posibilidad de modificar factores de posición, tamaño y color, es necesario incluir imágenes que hagan parte del contexto del usuario facilitando la selección de las imágenes relevantes para la creación del mensaje. Los resultados de esta propuesta pueden ser de utilidad para desarrolladores de sistemas CAA ya que sirven como guía para el diseño de interfaces que facilitan al usuario la creación de frases.
20
augmentative and alternative communication systems (AAC)
graphic interfaces design
People with language production disabilities must challenge different situations in which they depend on others to share their feelings and necessities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) systems had emerged as an alternative to give the possibility of sharing information using graphic content selection. Some problems this kind of systems have are the low user interfaces usability levels, the nonuse of context and the lack of language-related pictograms. In this paper, a set of factors to be taken into account at the AAC systems interface design process are presented. This work also shows the evaluation of graphic content designed specifically for the context of users with aphasia, an impairment characterized by the loss of capabilities to understand and produce writing or speech. Test results showed that besides the modification of position, size, and color factors it’s necessary to include relevant images according to the user’s context facilitating the production of the message. The proposal results can be used by AAC systems developers as a guide to the development of interfaces that enhance the sentences creation process.
Graphic interfaces and graphic components design guidelines for augmentative and alternative communication systems.
usability
Journal article
2019-07-01T00:00:00Z
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/188/148
2019-07-01
1794-7111
2462-8115
10.17151/kepes.2019.16.20.13
https://doi.org/10.17151/kepes.2019.16.20.13
345
375
2019-07-01T00:00:00Z
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Kepes
title Lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa.
spellingShingle Lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa.
Garnica Gaitán, Germán Andrés
Narváez Alarcón, Cristian Andrés
usabilidad
sistema de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA)
diseño de interfaces gráficas
augmentative and alternative communication systems (AAC)
graphic interfaces design
usability
title_short Lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa.
title_full Lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa.
title_fullStr Lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa.
title_full_unstemmed Lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa.
title_sort lineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa.
title_eng Graphic interfaces and graphic components design guidelines for augmentative and alternative communication systems.
description Las personas con dificultades en la producción del lenguaje deben enfrentarse a situaciones que les hace depender día a día de otras personas, ya que no pueden comunicar sus pensamientos ni necesidades. Para ayudar a estas personas los sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA) ofrecen la posibilidad de transmitir información a partir de la selección de componentes gráficos que representan la realidad, entre los problemas de este tipo de sistemas se encuentran los bajos niveles de usabilidad en las interfaces gráficas y el uso de pictogramas que no se adecuan al contexto y lenguaje de los usuarios. Este trabajo presenta una serie de factores a tener en cuenta al momento de diseñar una interfaz gráfica para sistemas CAA y la evaluación de material gráfico diseñado específicamente para el contexto de los usuarios con afasia, una enfermedad que se caracteriza por la pérdida de la capacidad de producir y comprender el lenguaje oral y escrito. Las pruebas señalan que adicional a la posibilidad de modificar factores de posición, tamaño y color, es necesario incluir imágenes que hagan parte del contexto del usuario facilitando la selección de las imágenes relevantes para la creación del mensaje. Los resultados de esta propuesta pueden ser de utilidad para desarrolladores de sistemas CAA ya que sirven como guía para el diseño de interfaces que facilitan al usuario la creación de frases.
description_eng People with language production disabilities must challenge different situations in which they depend on others to share their feelings and necessities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) systems had emerged as an alternative to give the possibility of sharing information using graphic content selection. Some problems this kind of systems have are the low user interfaces usability levels, the nonuse of context and the lack of language-related pictograms. In this paper, a set of factors to be taken into account at the AAC systems interface design process are presented. This work also shows the evaluation of graphic content designed specifically for the context of users with aphasia, an impairment characterized by the loss of capabilities to understand and produce writing or speech. Test results showed that besides the modification of position, size, and color factors it’s necessary to include relevant images according to the user’s context facilitating the production of the message. The proposal results can be used by AAC systems developers as a guide to the development of interfaces that enhance the sentences creation process.
author Garnica Gaitán, Germán Andrés
Narváez Alarcón, Cristian Andrés
author_facet Garnica Gaitán, Germán Andrés
Narváez Alarcón, Cristian Andrés
topicspa_str_mv usabilidad
sistema de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA)
diseño de interfaces gráficas
topic usabilidad
sistema de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA)
diseño de interfaces gráficas
augmentative and alternative communication systems (AAC)
graphic interfaces design
usability
topic_facet usabilidad
sistema de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA)
diseño de interfaces gráficas
augmentative and alternative communication systems (AAC)
graphic interfaces design
usability
citationvolume 16
citationissue 20
citationedition Núm. 20 , Año 2019 : Julio - Diciembre
publisher Universidad de Caldas
ispartofjournal Kepes
source https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/188
language Español
format Article
rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Cristian Andrés Narváez - 2019
references Narváez, C. Sastoque, S. and Iregui, M. (2015). Spanish language generation engine to enhance the syntactic quality of AAC systems. 11th International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis (SIPAIM 2015). DOI: https://10.1117/12.2211435
Blake, M. (2000). Examining perceptions of graphic symbols across cultures: Preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, vol. 16, 180-185). DOI: https://10.1080/07434610012331279034.
Davidson, B., Howe, T., Worrall, L., Hickson, L., and Togher, L. (2008). Social participation for older people with aphasia: The impact of communication disability on friendships. Topics in stroke rehabilitation, vol. 15, 325-340. DOI: https://10.1310/tsr1504-325.
Dumas, J. (2002, January). User-based evaluations. In The human-computer interaction handbook (pp. 1093-1117). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. ISBN: 0- 8058-3838-4.
Higginbotham, D. and Bedrosian, J. (1995). Subject selection in AAC research: Decision points. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, vol. 11, 11-13. DOI: https://10.1080/07434619512331277099.
Hillis, A. (2007). Aphasia progress in the last quarter of a century. Neurology, vol. 69, 200-213. DOI: https://10.1212/01.wnl.0000265600.69385.6f.
Hornero, G., Conde, D., Quílez, M., Domingo, S., Rodríguez, M., Romero, B. and Casas, O. (2015). A wireless augmentative and alternative communication system for people with speech disabilities., IEEE Access, vol. 3, 1288-1297. DOI: https://10.1109/access.2015.2466110.
International Organization for Standardization. (2018). Ergonomics of humansystem interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts (ISO 9241- 11:2018). Recuperado de https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en.
Keskinen, T., Heimonen, T., Turunen, M. Rajaniemi, J. and Kauppinen, S. (2012). SymbolChat: A flexible picture-based communication platform for users with intellectual disabilities. Interacting with Computers, vol. 24, 374-386. DOI: https://10.1016/j.intcom.2012.06.003.
Lam, J. & Wodchis, W. (2010). The relationship of 60 disease diagnoses and 15 conditions to preference-based health-related quality of life in Ontario hospital-based long-term care residents. Medical care, 48, 380-387. DOI: https://10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca2647.
Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). The Changing Face of Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Past, Present, and Future Challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 197-204. DOI: https://10.3109/07434618.2012.737024.
Salminen, A., Petrie, H. and Ryan, S. (2004). Impact of computer augmented communication on the daily lives of speech-impaired children. Part I: Daily communication and activities., Technology and Disability, vol. 16, 157- 167. DOI: https://10.3233/tad-2004-16306.
Chan, R. (2014). Cloud augmentative and alternative communication for people with complex communication needs. Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) (2727-2732). IEEE. DOI: https://10.1109/glocom.2014.7037220.
Mancilla, D., Sastoque, S., & Iregui, M. (2015, January). Towards ontology personalization to enrich social conversations on AAC systems. In 10th International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis (Vol. 9287, p. 92870Z). International Society for Optics and Photonics. DOI: https://10.1117/12.2073865.
Mancilla, D., Sastoque, S., Mendoza, J. and Iregui, M. (2013). Conceptualizing a daily activities ontology for an augmentative and alternative communication system. 5th Latin American Conference on Networked and Electronic Media (LACNEM-2013). Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Sede Manizales. DOI: https://10.1117/12.2073865.
Quesenbery, W. (2004). Balancing the 5Es of Usability. Cutter IT Journal, vol. 17, 4-11.
Babic, J., Slivar, I., Car, Z. and Podobnik, V. (2015). Prototype-driven software development process for augmentative and alternative communication applications. 13th International Conference on Telecommunications (ConTEL). DOI: https://10.1109/ConTEL.2015.7231204.
Hernández, S. S., Mancilla, D., Medina, J. M., & Iregui, M. (2014). Usercentric Recommendation Model for AAC based on Multi-criteria Planning. International Conference on Advances in Human-oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Technologies and Services. ISBN: 978-1-61208-369-8.
Sastoque, S., Narváez, C. y Garnica, G. (2016). Metodología para la construcción de Interfaces Gráficas Centradas en el Usuario. Nuevas Ideas en Informática Educativa, vol. 12, 314-324. ISBN: 978-956-19-0989-2.
Saturno, C., Ramirez, A., Conte, M., Farhat, M., y Piucco, E. (2015). An augmentative and alternative communication tool for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 34, 632-645. DOI: https://10.1080/0144929X.2015.1019567.
Seffah, A., Donyaee, M., Kline, R. y Padda, H. (2006). Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model. Software Quality Journal, vol. 14, 159-178. DOI: https://10.1007/s11219-006-7600-8.
Stent, A. & Bangalore, S., Natural language generation in interactive systems. Cambridge University Press, 2014. DOI: https://10.1007/CBO9780511844492.
The State of Queensland, Complex communication needs (2018). Retrieved from https://www.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/58540/complexcommunication-needs.pdf
Van, E. and Alant, E. (2004). Associations with Minspeak™ icons. Journal of communication disorders, vol. 37, 255-274. DOI: https://10.1016/j.jcomdis.2003.10.002.
Belani, H. (2012, June). Towards a usability requirements taxonomy for mobile AAC services. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Usability and Accessibility Focused Requirements Engineering (pp. 36-39). IEEE Press. DOI: https://10.1109/usare.2012.6226789.
Al Mahmud, A. and Martens, J. (2016). Social networking through email: studying email usage patterns of persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, vol. 30, 186-210.
Al-Arifi, B., Al-Rubaian, A., Al-Ofisan, G., Al-Romi, N., & Al-Wabil, A. (2013, July). Towards an arabic language augmentative and alternative communication application for autism. International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability ,333-341. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: https://10.1007/978-3-642-39241-2_37.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2019-07-01
date_accessioned 2019-07-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2019-07-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/188
url_doi https://doi.org/10.17151/kepes.2019.16.20.13
issn 1794-7111
eissn 2462-8115
doi 10.17151/kepes.2019.16.20.13
citationstartpage 345
citationendpage 375
url2_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/188/148
_version_ 1798191664613818368