The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City.
In this work the author offers a rich and deep examination on the practices of “eminent domain” in three of the most important Latin-American cities. He approaches as the previous thing, of a critical way, the relations between the legal rules that concern of “eminent domain” and the institutional context in which the above mentioned rules are applied, in a two-dimensional perspective: the first one, that of the relations between the power judicial, legislative and executive in the relating thing to “eminent domain”, and the second one, the distribution of authority with relation to “eminent domain” to level of national, provincial or local governments. For this route the author achieves a guessed right comparative analysis, giving context... Ver más
Guardado en:
1692-6013
2500-8692
2
2008-07-01
69
100
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Antonio Azuela - 2008
| id |
00cd65a3af7992ef2e19420a3c1fe9b7 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. Property rights Novum Jus Universidad Catolica de Colombia Artículo de revista Núm. 1 , Año 2008 :Julio - Diciembre 1 Economic development Corruption Expropriation 2 Eminent domain In this work the author offers a rich and deep examination on the practices of “eminent domain” in three of the most important Latin-American cities. He approaches as the previous thing, of a critical way, the relations between the legal rules that concern of “eminent domain” and the institutional context in which the above mentioned rules are applied, in a two-dimensional perspective: the first one, that of the relations between the power judicial, legislative and executive in the relating thing to “eminent domain”, and the second one, the distribution of authority with relation to “eminent domain” to level of national, provincial or local governments. For this route the author achieves a guessed right comparative analysis, giving context to the above mentioned practices of “eminent domain”, in the reality of each one of this metropolis, allowing the inferences landed that similar studies lack. Azuela, Antonio Serkin, C. (2005). “The meaning of value: Assessing just compensation for regulatory takings”. Northwestern University Law Review, 99, p. 677. Caro, R. (1974). The power broker: Robert Moses and the fall of New York. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Fischel, W. (2001). The homevoter hypothesis: How home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land-use policies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Garnett, N. (2006). “The neglected political economy of eminent domain”. Michigan Law Review, 105, p. 101. Text Munch, P. (1976). “An economic analysis of eminent domain”. Journal of Political Economy, 84, p. 473. http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Antonio Azuela - 2008 http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Berliner, D. (2003). Public power, private gain. Institute for Justice. http://www.castlecoalition.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=312 Publication https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Journal article En este trabajo el autor ofrece un examen sobre las prácticas de dominio eminente (eminent domain) en tres de las más importantes ciudades latinoamericanas. Aborda conforme lo anterior, de manera crítica, las relaciones entre las reglas legales usadas respecto del dominio eminente y el contexto institucional en el cual son aplicadas dichas reglas, en una perspectiva bidimensional: la primera, la de las relaciones entre los poderes judicial, legislativo y ejecutivo en lo concerniente al dominio eminente, y la segunda, la distribución de autoridad con relación al dominio eminente a nivel de gobiernos nacionales, provinciales o locales. Por esta vía logra el autor un acertado análisis comparativo, contextualizando dichas prácticas de dominio eminente, con la realidad de cada una de esas metrópolis, permitiendo las inferencias aterrizadas de que carecen estudios similares. Dominio eminente Derechos de propiedad https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/891 Expropiación The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. application/pdf Corrupción Inglés Desarrollo económico https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/891/918 2008-07-01T00:00:00Z 2008-07-01T00:00:00Z 2008-07-01 2500-8692 https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/891 100 69 1692-6013 |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADCATOLICADECOLOMBIA/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Novum Jus |
| title |
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. |
| spellingShingle |
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. Azuela, Antonio Property rights Economic development Corruption Expropriation Eminent domain Dominio eminente Derechos de propiedad Expropiación Corrupción Desarrollo económico |
| title_short |
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. |
| title_full |
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. |
| title_fullStr |
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. |
| title_sort |
use of eminent domain in são paulo, bogotá, and mexico city. |
| title_eng |
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. |
| description |
In this work the author offers a rich and deep examination on the practices of “eminent domain” in three of the most important Latin-American cities. He approaches as the previous thing, of a critical way, the relations between the legal rules that concern of “eminent domain” and the institutional context in which the above mentioned rules are applied, in a two-dimensional perspective: the first one, that of the relations between the power judicial, legislative and executive in the relating thing to “eminent domain”, and the second one, the distribution of authority with relation to “eminent domain” to level of national, provincial or local governments. For this route the author achieves a guessed right comparative analysis, giving context to the above mentioned practices of “eminent domain”, in the reality of each one of this metropolis, allowing the inferences landed that similar studies lack.
|
| description_eng |
En este trabajo el autor ofrece un examen sobre las prácticas de dominio eminente (eminent domain) en tres de las más importantes ciudades latinoamericanas. Aborda conforme lo anterior, de manera crítica, las relaciones entre las reglas legales usadas respecto del dominio eminente y el contexto institucional en el cual son aplicadas dichas reglas, en una perspectiva bidimensional: la primera, la de las relaciones entre los poderes judicial, legislativo y ejecutivo en lo concerniente al dominio eminente, y la segunda, la distribución de autoridad con relación al dominio eminente a nivel de gobiernos nacionales, provinciales o locales. Por esta vía logra el autor un acertado análisis comparativo, contextualizando dichas prácticas de dominio eminente, con la realidad de cada una de esas metrópolis, permitiendo las inferencias aterrizadas de que carecen estudios similares.
|
| author |
Azuela, Antonio |
| author_facet |
Azuela, Antonio |
| topicspa_str_mv |
Property rights Economic development Corruption Expropriation Eminent domain |
| topic |
Property rights Economic development Corruption Expropriation Eminent domain Dominio eminente Derechos de propiedad Expropiación Corrupción Desarrollo económico |
| topic_facet |
Property rights Economic development Corruption Expropriation Eminent domain Dominio eminente Derechos de propiedad Expropiación Corrupción Desarrollo económico |
| citationvolume |
2 |
| citationissue |
1 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 1 , Año 2008 :Julio - Diciembre |
| publisher |
Universidad Catolica de Colombia |
| ispartofjournal |
Novum Jus |
| source |
https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/891 |
| language |
Inglés |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Antonio Azuela - 2008 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| references_eng |
Serkin, C. (2005). “The meaning of value: Assessing just compensation for regulatory takings”. Northwestern University Law Review, 99, p. 677. Caro, R. (1974). The power broker: Robert Moses and the fall of New York. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Fischel, W. (2001). The homevoter hypothesis: How home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land-use policies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Garnett, N. (2006). “The neglected political economy of eminent domain”. Michigan Law Review, 105, p. 101. Munch, P. (1976). “An economic analysis of eminent domain”. Journal of Political Economy, 84, p. 473. Berliner, D. (2003). Public power, private gain. Institute for Justice. http://www.castlecoalition.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=312 |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2008-07-01 |
| date_accessioned |
2008-07-01T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2008-07-01T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/891 |
| url_doi |
https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/891 |
| issn |
1692-6013 |
| eissn |
2500-8692 |
| citationstartpage |
69 |
| citationendpage |
100 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/891/918 |
| _version_ |
1797158380039569408 |