Validación española del “Inventario de Instantánea Vital”

Validación española del “Inventario de Instantánea Vital”

Introducción: El Inventario de Instantánea Vital (Life Snapshot Inventory; LSI) es un instrumento de autoinforme para medir las direcciones sociales, personales y vitales significativas para el individuo. Se ha creado desde la Psicoterapia Analítica Funcional (FAP) como una evaluación continua de los cambios en diversas áreas de la vida de un individuo (familia, trabajo, amor, espiritualidad, sexualidad, salud, etc.). Objetivo: Validar por primera vez las características psicométricas de este instrumento. Metodología: Este estudio implicó una muestra española donde participaron 530 personas (edad media 33 años). El cuestionario se ha comparado con la Escala de Autoestima de Rosenberg (RSES) para obtener validez convergente. Resultados: Los... Ver más

Guardado en:

International Journal of Psychological Research

2011-2084

2011-7922

Valero-Aguayo, Luis

Ferro-García, Rafael

Macías-Morón, Juan José

Ruiz-García, Antonio

UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA

10.21500/20112084.5095

14

2021-10-27

9

17

Colombia

terapias contextuales

valores

cuestionario

Instantánea Vital

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

id 000c53c616403230122150637a5345e0
record_format ojs
spelling Validación española del “Inventario de Instantánea Vital”
FAP
Artículo de revista
terapias contextuales
valores
cuestionario
Instantánea Vital
Validación española del “Inventario de Instantánea Vital”
Introducción: El Inventario de Instantánea Vital (Life Snapshot Inventory; LSI) es un instrumento de autoinforme para medir las direcciones sociales, personales y vitales significativas para el individuo. Se ha creado desde la Psicoterapia Analítica Funcional (FAP) como una evaluación continua de los cambios en diversas áreas de la vida de un individuo (familia, trabajo, amor, espiritualidad, sexualidad, salud, etc.). Objetivo: Validar por primera vez las características psicométricas de este instrumento. Metodología: Este estudio implicó una muestra española donde participaron 530 personas (edad media 33 años). El cuestionario se ha comparado con la Escala de Autoestima de Rosenberg (RSES) para obtener validez convergente. Resultados: Los resultados mostraron una alta fiabilidad como consistencia interna (α=.93) y una correlación de .61, ambas estadísticamente significativas. El análisis factorial mostró un único factor (43.56% de la varianza). Además, el instrumento fue sensible a los cambios originados por la intervención, y permitió diferenciar aquellas personas con problemas vitales. Conclusión: Este cuestionario podría ser una medida de gran ayuda para utilizar en contextos clínicos y sanitarios.
Kohlenberg, R. J., Tsai, M., Ferro García, R., Valero, L., Fernández Parra, A., & Virués-Ortega, J. (2005). Psicoterapia analítico-funcional y terapia de aceptación y compromiso: Teoría, aplicaciones y continuidad con el análisis del comportamiento [Functional analytical psychotherapy and acceptance and commitment therapy: Theory, applications and continuity with the behavior analysis]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5 (2), 37–67.
Reilly, E. R., Ritzert, T. R., Scoglio, A. A. J., Mote, J., Fukyuda, S. D., Ahern, M. E., & Kelly, M. M. (2019). A systematic review of values measures in acceptance and commitment therapy research. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 12, 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbs.2018.10.004.
Orth, U., & Robins, R. W. (2014). The development of self-esteem. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23 (5), 381–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414547414.
Moksnes, U. K., & Espnes, G. A. (2013). Self-esteem and life satisfaction in adolescents: Gender and age as potential moderators. Quality of Life Research, 22, 2921–2928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0427-4.
Miller, B. K., Zuvnuska, S., & Kacmar, K. M. (2019). Self-perception and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.12.003.
Mann, M., Hosman, C., Sschaalma, H., & de Vries, N. (2004). Self-esteem in a broad-spectrum approach to mental health promotion. Health Education Research, 19 (4), 357–372. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg041.
Mangabeira, V., Del Prette, G., & Kanter, J. (2012). Functional analytic psychotherapy: A review of publications from 1990 to 2010. International Journal of Behavior Consultation and Therapy, 7 (2–3), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100941.
Lin, C. C. (2015). Self-esteem mediates the relationship between dispositional gratitude and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.045.
Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Zhou, C., & Li, T. (2014). Affect and self-esteem as mediators between trait resilience and psychological adjustment. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.023.
Krieger, T., Hermann, H., Zimmermann, J., & Grosse Holtforth, M. (2015). Associations of self-compassion and global self-esteem with positive and negative affect and stress reactivity in daily life: Findings from a smart phone study. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 288–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.009.
Leary, M. R., & MacDonald, G. (2003). Individual differences in self-esteem: A review and theoretical integration. In M. R. Leary, & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 401418). The Guilford Press.
Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image (revised edition).WesleyanUniversityPress. Salerno, L., Ingoglia, S., & Lo Coco, G. (2017). Competing factor structures of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale and its measurement invariance across clinical and non-clinical samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.063.
Maitland, D. W. M., Kanter, J. W., Manbeck, K. E., & Kuczynski, A. M. (2017). Relationship science informed clinically relevant behaviors in functional analytic psychotherapy: The awareness, courage, and love model. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6 (4), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.07.002.
Maitland, D. W. M., & Gaynor, S. T. (2012). Promoting efficacy research on functional analytic psychotherapy. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 7 (2–3), 125–134. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/h0100947.
Macías, J., Valero-Aguayo, L., Bond, F. W., & Blanca, M. J. (2019). The efficacy of functional-analytic psychotherapy and acceptance and commitment therapy (FACT) for public employees. Psicothema, 31 (1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.202.
López-Bermúdez, M. A., Ferro-García, R., Calvillo-Mazarro, M., & Valero-Aguayo, L. (2021). Importance of the therapeutic relationship: Efficacy of functional analytic psychotherapy with different problems. Clinica y Salud, 32 (3), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.5093/cl6sa2020a32.
Richter, D., Wall, A., Bruen, A., & Whittington, R. (2019). Is the global prevalence rate of adult mental illness increasing? Systematic review and metaanalysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 140 (5), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13083.
Tsai, M., Yoo, D., Hardebeck, E. J., Loudon, M. P., & Kohlenberg, R. J. (2019). Creating safe, evocative, attuned, and mutually vulnerable therapeutic beginnings: Strategies from functional analytic psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 56 (1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000203.
Schmitt, D., & Allik, J. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg self- esteem scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 623–642. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0022-35414.89.4.623.
Wilson, K. G., Sandoz, E. K., Kitchens, J., & Roberts, M. (2010). Thevalued living questionnaire:Defining and measuring valued action within a behavioral framework. The Psychological Record, 60, 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395706.
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Wersebe, H., Lieb, R., Meyer, A. H., Hofer, P., & Gloster, A. T. (2018). The link between stress, well-being, and psychological flexibility during an acceptance and commitment therapy self-help intervention. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 18 (1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.09.002.
Sortheix, F. M., & Lönnqvist, J. E. (2013). Personal values priorities and life satisfaction in Europe: The moderating role of socioeconomic development. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45 (2), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113504621.
Villas-Bôas, S. B., A.and Meyer, & Kanter, J. W. (2016). The effects of analyses of contingencies on clinically relevant behaviors and out-of-session changes in functional analytic psychotherapy. The Psychological Record, 66 (4), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0195-y.
Vázquez, A. J., Jiménez, R., & Vázquez-Morejón, R. (2004). Escala de autoestima de Rosenberg: fiabilidad y validez en población clínica española [Rosenberg self-esteem scale: Reliability and validity in a Spanish clinical sample]. Apuntes de Psicología, 22 (2), 247–255.
Valero-Aguayo, L., Ferro-García, R., López-Bermúdez, M. A., & Selva-López, M. A. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the experiencing of self scale (EOSS) for assessment in functional analytic psychotherapy. Psycothema, 26 (3), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2014.15.
Valero-Aguayo, L., & Ferro-García, R. (2018). Tratando con psicoterapia analítica funcional [Treating with functional analytic psychotherapy]. Piramide Editorial.
Valero-Aguayo, L., & Ferro-García, R. (2015). Psicoterapia analítica funcional. El análisis functional en la sesión clínica [Functional analytic psychotherapy: The functional analysis of the clinical session]. Síntesis Editorial.
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. (Second Edition). Guilford.
Tsai, M., Kohlenberg, R. J., Kanter, J. W., Kohlenberg, B., Follete, W. C., & Callaghan, G. M. (2009). Aguide to functional analytic psychotherapy. Awareness, courage, love, and behaviorism. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09787-9.
Kanter, J. W., Manbeck, K. E., Kuczynski, A. M., Maitland, D. W., Villas-Bôas, A., & Ortega, M. A. R. (2017). A comprehensive review of research on functional analytic psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 58, 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.010.
Diener, E., & Diener, M. (2009). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. In Diener E. (Eds.) Culture and Well-Being: Social Indicators Research Series, Vol 38 (pp. 71–92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2352-0_4.
Grant, N., Wardle, J., & Steptoe, A. (2009). The relationship between life satisfaction and health behavior: A cross-cultural analysis of young adult. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-009-9032-x.
Questionnaire
Journal article
Núm. 2 , Año 2021 : Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2021)
2
14
Contextual Therapies
Values
FAP
Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
Life Snapshot
Valero-Aguayo, Luis
Ferro-García, Rafael
Macías-Morón, Juan José
Ruiz-García, Antonio
Introduction: The Life Snapshot Inventory (LSI) is a self-report instrument to measure the meaningful vital, personal, and social directions. It was created in the Functional Analytic Psychotherapy as a continuous evaluation of vital changes in areas of life (family, work, love, spirituality, sexuality, health, etc.). Objective: The aim was to validate its psychometric characteristics for the first time. Method: This study involved 530 participants (average age 33 years), in a Spanish sample. The questionnaire has been compared with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) to obtain convergent validity. Results: The results showed a high internal consistency (α=.93) and a correlation of .61, both statistically significant. The factorial analysis showed only one factor (43.56% of variance). In addition, it was sensitive to changes due to interventions, and made it possible to differentiate those people with vital problems. Conclusion: This questionnaire could be a helpful measure for healthcare and clinical contexts.
Gnambs, T., & Kaspar, K. (2016). Socially desirable responding in web-based questionnaires: A metaanalytic review of the candour hypothesis. Assessment, 24 (6), 746–762. https://doi.org/0.1177/10731921115624547.
application/pdf
International Journal of Psychological Research
Inglés
Emerson, S. D., Guhn, M., & Gadermann, A. M. (2017). Measurement invariance of the satisfaction with life scale: Reviewing three decades of research. Quality of Life Research, 26 (9), 2251–2264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1552-2.
Céspedes, C., Rubio, A., Viñas, F., Mqlo, S., Lara, E., & Ríos, J. (2021). Relationship between selfconcept, selt-efficacy, and subjective well-being of native and migrant adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 620782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.620782.
Bajaj, B., Robins, R., & Pande, N. (2018). Mediating role of self-esteem on the relationship between mindfulness, anxiety, and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 127–131. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaid.2016.02.085.
Atienza, F. L., Moreno, Y., & Balaguer, I. (2000). Análisis de la dimensionalidad de la escala de autoestima de Rosenberg en una muestra de adolescentes valencianos [Analysis of the dimensionality of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale in a sample of valencian adolescents]. Revista de Psicología. Universitas Tarraconesis, 22 (1–2), 29–42.
Ancer, L., Meza, C., Pompa, E., Torres, F., & Landoro, R. (2011). Relación entre niveles de autoestima y estrés en estudiantes universitarios [Relationship between self-esteem and stress levels in university students]. Enseñanza e Investigación Psicológica, 16, 91–101.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/5095
Publication
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5095
2011-2084
10.21500/20112084.5095
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5095/4371
9
17
2011-7922
2021-10-27T20:47:37Z
2021-10-27T20:47:37Z
2021-10-27
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection International Journal of Psychological Research
title Validación española del “Inventario de Instantánea Vital”
spellingShingle Validación española del “Inventario de Instantánea Vital”
Valero-Aguayo, Luis
Ferro-García, Rafael
Macías-Morón, Juan José
Ruiz-García, Antonio
terapias contextuales
valores
cuestionario
Instantánea Vital
Questionnaire
Contextual Therapies
Values
Life Snapshot
title_short Validación española del “Inventario de Instantánea Vital”
title_full Validación española del “Inventario de Instantánea Vital”
title_fullStr Validación española del “Inventario de Instantánea Vital”
title_full_unstemmed Validación española del “Inventario de Instantánea Vital”
title_sort validación española del “inventario de instantánea vital”
description Introducción: El Inventario de Instantánea Vital (Life Snapshot Inventory; LSI) es un instrumento de autoinforme para medir las direcciones sociales, personales y vitales significativas para el individuo. Se ha creado desde la Psicoterapia Analítica Funcional (FAP) como una evaluación continua de los cambios en diversas áreas de la vida de un individuo (familia, trabajo, amor, espiritualidad, sexualidad, salud, etc.). Objetivo: Validar por primera vez las características psicométricas de este instrumento. Metodología: Este estudio implicó una muestra española donde participaron 530 personas (edad media 33 años). El cuestionario se ha comparado con la Escala de Autoestima de Rosenberg (RSES) para obtener validez convergente. Resultados: Los resultados mostraron una alta fiabilidad como consistencia interna (α=.93) y una correlación de .61, ambas estadísticamente significativas. El análisis factorial mostró un único factor (43.56% de la varianza). Además, el instrumento fue sensible a los cambios originados por la intervención, y permitió diferenciar aquellas personas con problemas vitales. Conclusión: Este cuestionario podría ser una medida de gran ayuda para utilizar en contextos clínicos y sanitarios.
description_eng Introduction: The Life Snapshot Inventory (LSI) is a self-report instrument to measure the meaningful vital, personal, and social directions. It was created in the Functional Analytic Psychotherapy as a continuous evaluation of vital changes in areas of life (family, work, love, spirituality, sexuality, health, etc.). Objective: The aim was to validate its psychometric characteristics for the first time. Method: This study involved 530 participants (average age 33 years), in a Spanish sample. The questionnaire has been compared with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) to obtain convergent validity. Results: The results showed a high internal consistency (α=.93) and a correlation of .61, both statistically significant. The factorial analysis showed only one factor (43.56% of variance). In addition, it was sensitive to changes due to interventions, and made it possible to differentiate those people with vital problems. Conclusion: This questionnaire could be a helpful measure for healthcare and clinical contexts.
author Valero-Aguayo, Luis
Ferro-García, Rafael
Macías-Morón, Juan José
Ruiz-García, Antonio
author_facet Valero-Aguayo, Luis
Ferro-García, Rafael
Macías-Morón, Juan José
Ruiz-García, Antonio
topicspa_str_mv terapias contextuales
valores
cuestionario
Instantánea Vital
topic terapias contextuales
valores
cuestionario
Instantánea Vital
Questionnaire
Contextual Therapies
Values
Life Snapshot
topic_facet terapias contextuales
valores
cuestionario
Instantánea Vital
Questionnaire
Contextual Therapies
Values
Life Snapshot
citationvolume 14
citationissue 2
citationedition Núm. 2 , Año 2021 : Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2021)
publisher Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
ispartofjournal International Journal of Psychological Research
source https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/5095
language Inglés
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
references_eng Kohlenberg, R. J., Tsai, M., Ferro García, R., Valero, L., Fernández Parra, A., & Virués-Ortega, J. (2005). Psicoterapia analítico-funcional y terapia de aceptación y compromiso: Teoría, aplicaciones y continuidad con el análisis del comportamiento [Functional analytical psychotherapy and acceptance and commitment therapy: Theory, applications and continuity with the behavior analysis]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5 (2), 37–67.
Reilly, E. R., Ritzert, T. R., Scoglio, A. A. J., Mote, J., Fukyuda, S. D., Ahern, M. E., & Kelly, M. M. (2019). A systematic review of values measures in acceptance and commitment therapy research. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 12, 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbs.2018.10.004.
Orth, U., & Robins, R. W. (2014). The development of self-esteem. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23 (5), 381–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414547414.
Moksnes, U. K., & Espnes, G. A. (2013). Self-esteem and life satisfaction in adolescents: Gender and age as potential moderators. Quality of Life Research, 22, 2921–2928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0427-4.
Miller, B. K., Zuvnuska, S., & Kacmar, K. M. (2019). Self-perception and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.12.003.
Mann, M., Hosman, C., Sschaalma, H., & de Vries, N. (2004). Self-esteem in a broad-spectrum approach to mental health promotion. Health Education Research, 19 (4), 357–372. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg041.
Mangabeira, V., Del Prette, G., & Kanter, J. (2012). Functional analytic psychotherapy: A review of publications from 1990 to 2010. International Journal of Behavior Consultation and Therapy, 7 (2–3), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100941.
Lin, C. C. (2015). Self-esteem mediates the relationship between dispositional gratitude and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.045.
Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Zhou, C., & Li, T. (2014). Affect and self-esteem as mediators between trait resilience and psychological adjustment. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.023.
Krieger, T., Hermann, H., Zimmermann, J., & Grosse Holtforth, M. (2015). Associations of self-compassion and global self-esteem with positive and negative affect and stress reactivity in daily life: Findings from a smart phone study. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 288–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.009.
Leary, M. R., & MacDonald, G. (2003). Individual differences in self-esteem: A review and theoretical integration. In M. R. Leary, & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 401418). The Guilford Press.
Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image (revised edition).WesleyanUniversityPress. Salerno, L., Ingoglia, S., & Lo Coco, G. (2017). Competing factor structures of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale and its measurement invariance across clinical and non-clinical samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.063.
Maitland, D. W. M., Kanter, J. W., Manbeck, K. E., & Kuczynski, A. M. (2017). Relationship science informed clinically relevant behaviors in functional analytic psychotherapy: The awareness, courage, and love model. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6 (4), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.07.002.
Maitland, D. W. M., & Gaynor, S. T. (2012). Promoting efficacy research on functional analytic psychotherapy. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 7 (2–3), 125–134. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/h0100947.
Macías, J., Valero-Aguayo, L., Bond, F. W., & Blanca, M. J. (2019). The efficacy of functional-analytic psychotherapy and acceptance and commitment therapy (FACT) for public employees. Psicothema, 31 (1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.202.
López-Bermúdez, M. A., Ferro-García, R., Calvillo-Mazarro, M., & Valero-Aguayo, L. (2021). Importance of the therapeutic relationship: Efficacy of functional analytic psychotherapy with different problems. Clinica y Salud, 32 (3), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.5093/cl6sa2020a32.
Richter, D., Wall, A., Bruen, A., & Whittington, R. (2019). Is the global prevalence rate of adult mental illness increasing? Systematic review and metaanalysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 140 (5), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13083.
Tsai, M., Yoo, D., Hardebeck, E. J., Loudon, M. P., & Kohlenberg, R. J. (2019). Creating safe, evocative, attuned, and mutually vulnerable therapeutic beginnings: Strategies from functional analytic psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 56 (1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000203.
Schmitt, D., & Allik, J. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg self- esteem scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 623–642. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0022-35414.89.4.623.
Wilson, K. G., Sandoz, E. K., Kitchens, J., & Roberts, M. (2010). Thevalued living questionnaire:Defining and measuring valued action within a behavioral framework. The Psychological Record, 60, 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395706.
Wersebe, H., Lieb, R., Meyer, A. H., Hofer, P., & Gloster, A. T. (2018). The link between stress, well-being, and psychological flexibility during an acceptance and commitment therapy self-help intervention. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 18 (1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.09.002.
Sortheix, F. M., & Lönnqvist, J. E. (2013). Personal values priorities and life satisfaction in Europe: The moderating role of socioeconomic development. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45 (2), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113504621.
Villas-Bôas, S. B., A.and Meyer, & Kanter, J. W. (2016). The effects of analyses of contingencies on clinically relevant behaviors and out-of-session changes in functional analytic psychotherapy. The Psychological Record, 66 (4), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0195-y.
Vázquez, A. J., Jiménez, R., & Vázquez-Morejón, R. (2004). Escala de autoestima de Rosenberg: fiabilidad y validez en población clínica española [Rosenberg self-esteem scale: Reliability and validity in a Spanish clinical sample]. Apuntes de Psicología, 22 (2), 247–255.
Valero-Aguayo, L., Ferro-García, R., López-Bermúdez, M. A., & Selva-López, M. A. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the experiencing of self scale (EOSS) for assessment in functional analytic psychotherapy. Psycothema, 26 (3), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2014.15.
Valero-Aguayo, L., & Ferro-García, R. (2018). Tratando con psicoterapia analítica funcional [Treating with functional analytic psychotherapy]. Piramide Editorial.
Valero-Aguayo, L., & Ferro-García, R. (2015). Psicoterapia analítica funcional. El análisis functional en la sesión clínica [Functional analytic psychotherapy: The functional analysis of the clinical session]. Síntesis Editorial.
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. (Second Edition). Guilford.
Tsai, M., Kohlenberg, R. J., Kanter, J. W., Kohlenberg, B., Follete, W. C., & Callaghan, G. M. (2009). Aguide to functional analytic psychotherapy. Awareness, courage, love, and behaviorism. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09787-9.
Kanter, J. W., Manbeck, K. E., Kuczynski, A. M., Maitland, D. W., Villas-Bôas, A., & Ortega, M. A. R. (2017). A comprehensive review of research on functional analytic psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 58, 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.010.
Diener, E., & Diener, M. (2009). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. In Diener E. (Eds.) Culture and Well-Being: Social Indicators Research Series, Vol 38 (pp. 71–92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2352-0_4.
Grant, N., Wardle, J., & Steptoe, A. (2009). The relationship between life satisfaction and health behavior: A cross-cultural analysis of young adult. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-009-9032-x.
Gnambs, T., & Kaspar, K. (2016). Socially desirable responding in web-based questionnaires: A metaanalytic review of the candour hypothesis. Assessment, 24 (6), 746–762. https://doi.org/0.1177/10731921115624547.
Emerson, S. D., Guhn, M., & Gadermann, A. M. (2017). Measurement invariance of the satisfaction with life scale: Reviewing three decades of research. Quality of Life Research, 26 (9), 2251–2264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1552-2.
Céspedes, C., Rubio, A., Viñas, F., Mqlo, S., Lara, E., & Ríos, J. (2021). Relationship between selfconcept, selt-efficacy, and subjective well-being of native and migrant adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 620782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.620782.
Bajaj, B., Robins, R., & Pande, N. (2018). Mediating role of self-esteem on the relationship between mindfulness, anxiety, and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 127–131. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaid.2016.02.085.
Atienza, F. L., Moreno, Y., & Balaguer, I. (2000). Análisis de la dimensionalidad de la escala de autoestima de Rosenberg en una muestra de adolescentes valencianos [Analysis of the dimensionality of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale in a sample of valencian adolescents]. Revista de Psicología. Universitas Tarraconesis, 22 (1–2), 29–42.
Ancer, L., Meza, C., Pompa, E., Torres, F., & Landoro, R. (2011). Relación entre niveles de autoestima y estrés en estudiantes universitarios [Relationship between self-esteem and stress levels in university students]. Enseñanza e Investigación Psicológica, 16, 91–101.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2021-10-27
date_accessioned 2021-10-27T20:47:37Z
date_available 2021-10-27T20:47:37Z
url https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/5095
url_doi https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5095
issn 2011-2084
eissn 2011-7922
doi 10.21500/20112084.5095
citationstartpage 9
citationendpage 17
url2_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5095/4371
_version_ 1797376675502096384

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares